Developers and apartment buyers have a narrowing window of opportunity before Brisbane's Olympic infrastructure pipeline begins competing directly with residential construction, pushing up costs, tightening labour supply and making new projects increasingly difficult to deliver.

While Brisbane's apartment market continues to benefit from strong population growth and limited housing supply, industry research suggests the years leading up to 2027 could prove to be the most important period for developers looking to secure builders and buyers hoping to purchase before the next wave of price increases.

A new Colliers report, Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games: Creating Solutions, highlights the scale of the challenge. While thousands of new homes are planned across South East Queensland, the Brisbane Olympic Athletes Village alone will deliver more than 10,500 beds during the Games before being converted into around 1,750 to 2,000 apartments. Equivalent to almost two years of typical inner-city apartment supply, the project will also absorb a significant share of the construction workforce and building materials.

The broader construction pipeline paints an even clearer picture.

Construction Skills Queensland's Horizon 2032 report forecasts Queensland's annual construction pipeline will average $69 billion over the coming years before peaking at $75 billion in 2027-28. Demand for construction workers is expected to increase by 17 per cent to almost 150,000 people, with the industry facing an annual shortfall of around 19,000 workers that could blow out to as many as 35,000 during the peak construction period.

The Olympic venues, athletes village and supporting infrastructure will account for billions of dollars worth of work across South East Queensland through to 2032, creating intense competition for labour at a time when Australia's residential construction sector is already under pressure.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=373834]

Colliers Queensland Residential Director Andrew Scriven said the convergence of these projects is creating a clear window of opportunity for both developers and buyers.

"From 2027 onwards, the market will shift dramatically," Scriven said.

"Labour will increasingly be locked into government-led infrastructure and Olympic projects, which means private residential developments will face higher costs and tighter margins. The developers who move now are the ones most likely to get projects off the ground."

Scriven said the same dynamic would also affect buyers, with fewer apartment projects expected to launch once construction capacity tightens.

"If you're looking to change your lifestyle over the next five years, now is your window of opportunity to buy."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150713 project_image_fid=373827]

Developers are already positioning themselves ahead of that window.

Following the success of Monarch at Toowong, Consolidated Properties is preparing to launch two new Brisbane apartment projects in the second half of 2026. They include <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/gloriette-30-bedivere-street-yeerongpilly-qld-4105">Gloriette</a> at Yeerongpilly Green, a 25-storey tower within one of Brisbane's key Olympic precincts, and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/castile-47-skyring-terrace-newstead-qld-4006">Castile</a>, a recently approved 25-storey riverfront development at 47 Skyring Terrace in Newstead.

Hutchinson Builders will deliver both projects, with early works already underway at Yeerongpilly and Newstead expected to commence later this year.

The timing comes as Brisbane's fundamentals continue to strengthen, with strong interstate migration, population growth and vacancy rates remaining below 1.5 per cent.

Colliers Queensland researcher Pragya Sharma said Greater Brisbane is forecast to require around 40,000 new apartments between 2021 and 2031.

"There's a real mismatch emerging between when housing is needed and when it will be feasible to build," Sharma said.

"As a result, the period leading up to 2027 presents a key window of opportunity for developers to secure approvals, funding and construction capacity, while buyers will have greater choice before supply constraints intensify."

Colliers research outlines a critical pre-2027 window to start residential projects before labour squeeze: now is the time to buy

Joel Robinson

Developers, buyers on watch in South East Queensland ahead of construction crunch: Colliers

It's taken less than nine months for developer Sherpa Property Group to sell out all 51 apartments in its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-oasis-palm-beach-7-9-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Oasis</a> development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/palm-beach-qld-4221">Palm Beach</a>, over a year before its anticipated completion.

&nbsp;

Located at 7-9 Sixth Avenue, the $67 million development has resonated strongly with both local owner-occupiers and downsizers seeking high-quality apartments within walking distance of the beach, dining precincts and everyday amenities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357458]

Christie Leet, Founder of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sherpa-property-group">Sherpa Group</a>, said the sell-out reflected both the strength of the Palm Beach market and the success of Sherpa's community-first approach to development.

"The sell-out of Oasis is a fantastic outcome and reinforces the strong demand we're seeing for thoughtfully designed apartments in lifestyle locations," Leet said.

"From the outset, our vision was to create a development that genuinely enhanced the Palm Beach community while providing residents with exceptional homes and wellness-focused amenities.

"We've been incredibly encouraged by the level of local support throughout the campaign, 72.5 per cent of buyers are locals, with a significant proportion of purchasers choosing Oasis as their future home rather than an investment."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357463]

Construction is now progressing following development approval, with trusted builder LPS Group delivering the project and completion anticipated in Q3 2027.

Oasis forms part of Sherpa Group's successful Flourish collection, which has become recognised for its focus on wellness, community and elevated coastal living.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357469]

Residents will have private access to a rooftop amenity space featuring a pool, gym, sauna, steam room, hot and cold plunge pools, spa and barbecue facilities.

"The success of Oasis demonstrates that buyers continue to prioritise quality, location and lifestyle," Leet said.

"We are proud to have delivered a project that has resonated so strongly with the market and look forward to bringing Oasis to life for our future residents."

Sherpa recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-palm-beach-1150-1160-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a>, its third instalment of the Flourish brand in Palm Beach following Flourish Oasis and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/amargo-6-12-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Amargo</a>.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151449]

Sherpa sells out Flourish Oasis in booming Palm Beach

Urban Property Group's <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/la-vera-macquarie-park-94-talavera-road-macquarie-park-nsw-2113">La Vera</a> is leading the next phase of Macquarie Park's residential evolution, with the new apartment development set to become the first of several new apartment projects in the precinct to complete.

The 169-apartment building has now topped out ahead of its scheduled completion in the third quarter of 2026, as new residential investment continues to reshape one of Sydney's largest employment hubs into a true mixed-use precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=368645]

Cox Architecture has designed La Vera to capture the best of its unique positioning on Talavera Road, orienting the building towards Lane Cove National Park.&nbsp;The building features a sculpted northern façade with flowing curves inspired by the surrounding landscape, while its city-facing elevation adopts a more structured architectural expression to maximise skyline views.

"The vision for the project was to conceive a building that adopted an organic and curvilinear form to the northern portion that faces the Lane Cove National Park," <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">Cox Architecture</a> Director Felipe Miranda said.

"The residents that reside in the northern portion of the building benefit by having beautifully crafted curved balconies that speak to the natural context and heighten the relationship of their internal living spaces to the external balconies."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=358802]

La Vera offers a diverse mix of one, two, three, and four-bedroom configurations, with prices currently starting from $740,000. Buyers so far have been a mix of Sydney-based investors,&nbsp;metro commuters, owner-occupiers and downsizers from surrounding North Shore suburbs.

Both investors and owner-occupiers have been drawn to La Vera's proximity to Macquarie University, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Centre and the Sydney Metro, infrastructure that supports both strong rental demand and a convenient lifestyle for residents.

The apartments feature full-height glazing, timber flooring throughout living areas, stone kitchen benchtops, SMEG appliances, floor-to-ceiling bathroom tiling and ducted air conditioning.

Residents will have access to a rooftop recreation level featuring a swimming pool, sauna, barbecue facilities and landscaped relaxation areas, complemented by additional communal space at ground level. Many apartments enjoy uninterrupted views across Lane Cove National Park, reinforcing the project's connection to its natural setting.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=364551]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a>, a family-owned developer and builder with nearly four decades of experience, holds a 4.5-star iCIRT rating and was Australia's first developer to introduce 10-Year Latent Defects Insurance (LDI). La Vera is the first apartment development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/macquarie-park-nsw-2113">Macquarie Park</a> approved to offer the additional insurance protection, alongside a five-year warranty on SMEG appliances.

Urban Property Group CEO Patrick Elias said the additional protection reflects changing buyer expectations in the off the plan market.

"Consumers are a lot more weary and a lot more concerned in buying off the plan than they ever have been. Having LDI is a tool to portray the confidence that we have in our product, and a confidence we want buyers to share," Elias said.

Following completion of the building later this year, buyers will move into their apartments well before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134951]

La Vera closes in on completion as Macquarie Park continues residential transformation

Brisbane developer Red &amp; Co's decision to include dual key apartments in its debut Gold Coast apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/como-varsity-lakes-22-lake-street-varsity-lakes-qld-4227">COMO Varsity Lakes</a>, is proving to be one of the project's biggest drawcards, with buyers quickly snapping up the flexible residences.

More than half of the project's 36 dual key apartments have already sold, helping drive COMO beyond the 50 per cent sold mark within the first month of launch.

The strong response highlights growing demand for apartment designs that can adapt to changing lifestyles, with buyers increasingly looking for homes that accommodate multi-generational living, provide rental income opportunities or simply offer greater flexibility over time.

Located on the shores of Lake Orr, COMO will deliver 156 apartments across 16 levels, with the dual-key residences forming a limited release within the broader development.

Each combines a primary two-bedroom apartment with a fully self-contained studio on a single title, connected by a shared foyer and lockable internal door. The design allows owners to house ageing parents, adult children or guests while maintaining privacy, or lease the secondary residence to generate additional income.

Just 17 of the original 36 dual key apartments remain available.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=367096]

The innovative configuration combines two fully self-contained residences on a single title, typically comprising a primary two-bedroom apartment alongside a separate studio residence, connected via a shared foyer and lockable internal door.&nbsp;

The model is proving particularly attractive to owner occupiers navigating changing family dynamics and the realities of the current housing crisis.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363511]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/npa">NPA</a>&nbsp;CEO Andrew Erwin said dual key living was resonating strongly with modern buyers because it delivered both financial flexibility and practical lifestyle benefits.&nbsp;

“The housing crisis and rising cost of living are fundamentally changing how Australians think about home ownership,” Erwin said.&nbsp;

“Dual key apartments provide a genuine solution for families who want to stay connected while maintaining independence. Parents can help adult children save for a future home, ageing parents can remain nearby without moving into aged care, and owners still retain privacy and flexibility.

“Importantly, buyers are also recognising the financial advantages. It creates the opportunity to generate additional income from part of the home without the holding costs associated with owning a separate investment property.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363509]

Unlike traditional dual occupancy arrangements, the residences operate under a single title, meaning owners only incur one set of body corporate fees, council rates and holding costs.&nbsp;

The secondary residence can also evolve over time - functioning as guest accommodation, a home office, creative studio or private retreat before later becoming an income-producing asset.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/red-co">Red &amp; Co</a>&nbsp;Director and Co-Founder David Laverty said the strong early sales reflected growing buyer urgency and changing priorities within the market.&nbsp;

“Securing more than half of COMO’s residences within such a short timeframe is an outstanding result and a clear endorsement of both the design and location,” Laverty said.&nbsp;

“Buyers are responding to the combination of location, connectivity and amenity, but ultimately it’s value relative to other East Coast markets that is driving enquiry.”&nbsp;

“We’re also seeing strong interest from owner occupiers looking for homes that can adapt with them over time. Flexibility has become one of the most important considerations for buyers in today’s market.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363515]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bda-architecture">BDA Architecture</a>, COMO features a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom residences with 2.7-metre ceilings and larger-format floorplans aimed at owner occupiers, downsizers and lifestyle-focused buyers.&nbsp;

The development will feature an extensive rooftop recreation and wellness offering including a 25-metre lap pool, sundeck, barbecue and dining areas, gym, sauna, plunge baths, landscaped gardens, wellness spaces and rooftop pickleball and paddleball courts.

The remaining dual key apartments range from 137 sqm to 167 sqm and include generous three-bedroom layouts with separate self-contained studio accommodation and dual parking.&nbsp;

Erwin said the dual key concept represented a broader shift in how Australians would live in the future.

“People want homes that can evolve with their lives,” he said.&nbsp;

“A dual key apartment can suit a family today, support an ageing parent tomorrow, and potentially generate income later on. That adaptability is becoming incredibly valuable in the current environment.”

Prices currently range from $2,115,750 to $2,583,000.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135546]

Inter-generational living drives demand for COMO’s dual key apartments as housing pressures reshape buyer priorities 

Builder-developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/ceerose">Ceerose</a> has doubled down on its Leichhardt ambitions, lodging its second State Significant Development Application (SSDA) in the suburb in the last six months.

Their newest proposal seeks to transform a former industrial precinct into a new residential community centred around the adaptive reuse of one of the site's heritage warehouse buildings.

The new project, on a 6,930 sqm block at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/40-76-william-street-leichhardt-nsw-2040">40–76 William Street</a>, will bring more than 200 apartments to a suburb that has seen little to no new supply in recent years. It follows Ceerose's late 2025 SSDA for a mixed-use apartment project on nearby Parramatta Road, signalling the developer's growing investment in Sydney's Inner West.

Ceerose Founder Edward Doueihi told Apartments.com.au the developer’s long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West had given it a strong understanding of how the area has evolved and where its future opportunities lie.

“Ceerose has had a long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West, giving us a unique understanding of the area’s evolution and future potential,” Doueihi said.

“Having delivered projects throughout the region, we have witnessed the suburb’s transformation first-hand and understand the opportunities for its continued growth.”

Doueihi said that understanding also informed the planning process, with a comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement Outcomes Report prepared before the application was lodged.

The report identified the key issues and concerns raised by neighbouring residents and other stakeholders, allowing those matters to be considered and incorporated into the design where appropriate.

He said the delivery of additional housing would also play an important role in supporting the revitalisation of Norton Street and the Italian Forum.

“By increasing the local residential population, the development is expected to strengthen demand for local businesses, encourage further investment, and help restore the vibrancy that made the precinct a thriving destination in the early 2000s.”

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7258c54c-8167-479e-8361-2d5fca9915b4" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010B%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%202.jpg?VersionId=S9DQfxu_jpcB5LrAEYFUbyMzg5odW6i5" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a>, the redevelopment would involve the demolition of four existing industrial buildings while retaining and adaptively reusing the site's most significant warehouse. The retained structure would anchor a new residential precinct comprising five interconnected buildings arranged around a large central landscaped courtyard, with heights stepping from five storeys along the surrounding residential streets to 11 storeys at the William Street corner.

According to the Architecture Design Report by Woods Bagot, the proposal "seeks to create a residential village centred around a generous green heart while celebrating the site's industrial heritage through the adaptive reuse of the existing warehouse building."

The development would comprise 203 apartments, with 188 proposed as build-to-sell residences, alongside 15 affordable housing apartments.

Rather than treating the retained warehouse as a standalone heritage object, Woods Bagot has sought to weave the site's industrial history throughout the masterplan. The proposal retains the north and west facades of the landmark corner warehouse, while new buildings reinterpret the site's brick-and-steel industrial language through their material palette and architectural expression.

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9e8c64c2-881b-49e1-8c90-6b6acaaa45b6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010C%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%203.jpg?VersionId=Qm8_8H_Xrg_sc4Mdjc59vlAcKF_5wRTb" />

The design is organised around what Woods Bagot describes as a "green heart", a landscaped communal open space that reinstates the leafy character removed when the site became an industrial storage facility. A new pedestrian laneway running through the site would improve permeability between William, North and Francis streets, linking residents through landscaped public spaces while activating the ground plane.

Residents would have access to communal gardens and shared recreation areas distributed throughout the development. Sustainability has also been prioritised, with the project targeting an average 7.9-star NatHERS rating. Proposed initiatives include rooftop solar generation, rainwater harvesting, passive solar design, naturally ventilated lobbies, extensive cross-ventilation and the reuse of existing building fabric to reduce embodied carbon.

The adaptive reuse strategy became a defining feature of the application after heritage investigations found only one of the site's industrial buildings could feasibly be retained. The Heritage Impact Statement concludes that preserving the key warehouse façades while referencing the site's industrial character throughout the new development provides an appropriate balance between renewal and conservation.

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="efffafdb-594f-4e2b-a067-921fd51c05e1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010D%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%204.jpg?VersionId=DPmE4.k16YRt0i27hEZVtJAffarpvUfx" />

"Retention and adaptation of the site buildings has been explored but found not to be feasible except for the tallest building, whose street facades will be retained," the heritage report states.

"The proposed building will interpret the brick and steel character of the subject site, including reuse of some components and construction of a large 'sawtooth' structure in the proposed open space."

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3bfef2b5-83f5-40cd-9cab-767092f34266" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010E%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%205.jpg?VersionId=7asb3i_ql4ybbuJOUb5UHBEIy0Q9t.DF" />

The William Street site is located around 300 metres from Leichhardt North Light Rail station and a short walk to Norton Street's retail, dining and hospitality precinct. The surrounding area has increasingly become a focus for urban renewal given its proximity to public transport and the Parramatta Road corridor.

Doueihi founded Ceerose in 1998 and has grown the business to become one of Sydney's more active apartment developers in recent years, with completed projects including The Alex Collective in Alexandria, Abbie's Lane in Annandale, and the award-winning Munro House in Elizabeth Bay. They are currently delivering Belgravia, 17 luxury apartments in Potts Point.

First look: Ceerose doubles down in Leichhardt with adaptive reuse of former warehouse site

Politics

<html><body>
In a <a href="http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/labor-backs-investment-in-better-bus-services-and-community-consultation">media release</a> distributed on Tuesday morning the Andrews Government has announced it will not proceed with proposals to alter the bus network which Transdev Melbourne operates. For a summary of the now rejected proposal, see <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/hundreds-of-bus-services-in-melbournes-west-and-north-face-being-cut-to-service-citys-east-20150413-1mk1no">this Age report</a> from Monday.

Transdev Melbourne - an operator which runs approximately 30% of Melbourne's bus network - originally sought to cut elongated routes, such as the orbital smart bus routes, and reduce frequencies on multiple northern and western routes in order to boost capacity in the east and south where patronage growth is reportedly strongest.

The Minister for Public Transport, Jacinta Allan has stated "rather than cutting buses in one area to increase buses in another, the Andrews Labor Government will develop a more balanced bus network plan in consultation with the community." Furthermore "demand for buses is growing faster than any other mode of transport, and we need to make sure they continue to meet the needs of our community.”

The State Government is now set to establish a new Ministerial consultative group encompassing new transport forums based around municipal areas. The bodies are set to look at ways to 'expand and improve public transport, including buses'.

<h2>Comment</h2>

One can only hope the new Ministerial consultative group conducts a root and branch - or spoke and hub - review of Melbourne's entire bus network. Smart buses are the offspring of the previous Bracks/Brumby Labor government and it appears the current Labor Government doesn't want to mess with that legacy as much given they have now rejected a proposal which would have seen the elongated orbital routes broken up into smaller segments.

In the series of news reports about the proposed changes a common theme became apparent: the longer smart bus routes were used more in some sections (east and south) compared to others (north and west). The proposal sought to address this by splitting routes so that buses ran over shorter routes in order to improve punctuality.

There's logic in the idea of splitting routes but I can't find much logic in reducing frequencies in a city where the population is growing - especially through the northern suburbs where there are over <a href="/news/melbourne-development-numbers-moonee-valley-moreland-darebin">100 projects which will yield 9,000-10,000 apartments</a> across the municipalities of Moonee Valley, Moreland and Darebin.

While many of the proposals, projects at sales and those currently under construction are focused on the radial public transport routes in suburbs closer to the centre of the city, it would be naive in the extreme to assume the current light and heavy rail networks will be sufficient to cater for the influx of people who will be moving to these municipalities and travelling between them.

South of Bell Street a dense network of cross-town bus routes currently exists however frequency is patchy with some routes running more often than others and the proposed changes would have seem a reduction of services on Bell Street itself.

The announcement of new transport forums is positive however I believe the consultantive groups should be cautious given the Government has announced they will be based around local government areas. Does that mean each municipality will hold its own forum or will the forums focus on groups of municipalities in the different regions of the metropolitan area?

The worst possible outcome will be if forums are conducted in municipal pockets where hyper-local interests are likely to overrule regional transport goals thus entrenching oddities like <a href="/news/bus-routes-which-need-improvement-the-506">dog's leg deviations</a>, <a href="/news/is-it-time-to-reconfigure-the-moonee-ponds-transport-interchange">bus termini that fall short</a> of connecting with other public transport modes, low frequencies and reduced hours of operation.

Lead image credit: <a href="https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Transdev_Melbourne_number_972_(8253AO)_Custom_Coaches_bodied_Scania_in_PTV_livery_on_route_250_in_Queen_St,_December_2013.jpg">Wikipedia</a>.
</body></html>

Alastair Taylor

Spring Street rejects Transdev bus network changes

<html><body>
The No Land Tax Party candidate Peter Jones is ahead of the Liberal Party in the race for the final of 21 seats up for grabs in the NSW Legislative Council.
The Daily Telegraph report the Coalition on track to win nine, Labor seven, the Greens two and the Shooters and Fishers and Christian Democrats one each.
The final results should be declared on Friday with the veteran ABC election analyst Antony Green saying he was “confident” No Land Tax will take the 21st seat.
If No Land Tax does win a seat for the next eight years, it would leave the ­Coalition with 20 of 42 upper house seats. 
The party secured the prime Group A spot on the long Legislative Council ballot.
It secured about 80,000 upper house votes with 70% of the vote counted, representing about 2% of the overall vote. 
The party, which went close to imploding in the days before the 28 March election, owes money to a large number of the 3,600 people who worked by handing out how to vote cards on election day. 
The promised wage delivery had been revised, yet again, to be undertake this week.
"I profoundly apologise," party candidate Peter Jones told 2GB's Ben Fordham.
The No Land Tax Party was initially throught to be in battle with the Animal Justice Party for the 21st spot, with the election result feared set to be challenged.
Due to human error, the Animal Justice Party was left off about 19,000 iVote ballots in the early pre-poll voting.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

No Land Tax looms as NSW Upper House policy gadfly

<html><body>
My last Saturday was spent by securing development sites in a new land release, then meeting with a potential new client, followed by working on the lolly stall at my son's school fete and then finally casting my vote.
In New South Wales, we had a state election and the Liberals won.
I was happy with this result. Now they say never to discuss politics or religion at a party, but there's no mention of what to include in a blog.  Look, I'm not very politically minded and I know there are great things that other parties stand for. I was interested to see a party by the name of No Land Tax, that tickled my fancy and I believe they got a fair whack of votes. But I have to say, when the Libs are in it usually means that some big infrastructure funding will take place.
And this is what I'm most interested in.
Infrastructure spend is music to the ears of property developers and investors. It means money will be ploughed into the local communities. The benefits of large infrastructure projects such as road upgrades or new hospitals, means local employment is boosted and workers are attracted to the area, boosting rental demand. These workers spend money and so we see a flow on effect into retail sales as the works are undertaken.
For example, in Maitland City, one of the locations in the Lower Hunter Region that Property Bloom develops in, there was a nice list of government spending confirmed. These planned infrastructure investments were confirmed after the election and include a $7 million investment in a the New England Highway upgrade, one public school will receive a $5 million upgrade and another $1 million; Maitland PCYC will receive $1 million expansion to support youth activities. There will also be $25 million spent on planning for the new Maitland hospital and $3.8 million for a new ambulance station.
These announcements are all good indicators that the city is dynamic and there are solid plans for future growth. It may also indicate that it's a good place to buy or build an investment property. Of course you need to do your due diligence to ensure you are investing in the right suburbs that will enjoy the impact of these works and where there is good demand for rental properties, but that's not a hard thing to do.
When the Sydney market is over inflated, it seems like a no brainer to turn to these large regional cities as an affordable alternative.
When this kind of money is invested into a community it has a trickledown effect. It builds business confidence and encourages other investment spending.
So after Saturday, this city is celebrating the good news. So are our clients who have invested and developed property in the area. We are happy that we've completed a number of development projects in this location and have just been notified of some new development opportunities.
Wishing you all a happy and safe Easter break.
<a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au" target="_blank">www.propertybloom.com.au</a>
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

Why the NSW Liberals win is good news for property developers and investors: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
In August 2014 during what turned out to be the last few months of the Napthine Liberal Government it had become very apparent that Victorian State politics had gone from being design smart to design stupid in a matter of a few of years.

<blockquote>
Within a single term of government from 2010 to 2014 we have gone from a design-intelligent and architecturally progressive State Government, to one which has marginalized those best able to advise it. The public who voted in the Architect Premier in 2010 have every right to feel let down by the party politics that has led to this point.
<cite>Red + Black Architect, Architecture and Politics 25 August 2014</cite>
</blockquote>

In late November, change was upon us as the a new Victorian State Government led by Daniel Andrews swept to power. It has now been over 100 days since the election which is a good time to check in with what is happening or not happening with built environment politics. The following is a report card with a score out of 10 possible marks.

<h2>Consultation with the Australian Institute of Architects</h2>

First up on the checklist is government consultation with architects and the key organisations. Last year it was quite astonishing and very concerning to report that in Matthew Guy’s 4 years as Planning Minister he had only one face-to-face meeting with the Australian Institute of Architects. It is therefore very pleasing to be able to report that within 10 days of taking his office, the new Planing Minister, Richard Wynne has already equaled Matthew Guy’s total number of AIA meetings.

Red + Black Architect (R+BA) score: 1 mark (out of 1 available)

<h2>Consultation with the Architects Registration Board of Victoria</h2>

In 2012 the Liberal Government made the unexpected announcement that the Architects Registration Board would be merged into a new body the Victorian Building Authority.

At the time The Red and Black Architect covered this most contentious issue in three posts:

<ul>
<li>Architect Registration Board to be abolished</li>
	<li>A Red and Black Investigation into the future of the Architects Registration Board of Victoria</li>
	<li>The Case To Retain the Architects Registration Board of Victoria</li>
</ul>
Despite the talk of pushing this change through, the draft legislation was never passed through the parliament, due in part to the 2014 Geoff Shaw political crisis. This has left the Architectural profession guessing as to how registration and the Architects Act will be administered in the future.

The good news however is that this uncertainty is very likely to be resolved in the next few weeks. At this stage it also appears most likely that the ARBV will retain it’s current structure as a stand alone entity as it has since its inception in 1923.

This has the additional benefit of aligning with stand alone registration boards in other States and Territories. It is sincerely hoped by R+BA that in the future a National Architects Registration Board could be developed to facilitate a more interconnected and mobile profession.

R+BA score: 1 mark (out of 1 available)

<h2>Office of the Victorian Government Architect</h2>

The next organisation to address is the Office of the Victorian Government Architect. Here there have also been very positive meetings with Richard Wynne discussing the importance of the OVGA to Victoria’s future.

First the good news. It appears likely that the OVGA will be moving back to where it belongs, reporting directly to the office of Premier and Cabinet. This is where the OVGA can undertake its best work, independent of undue influence with a direct line to the most powerful office in the government. Discussing this exact issue, Michael Bleby recently wrote <a href="http://www.afr.com/business/construction/victoria-planning-minister-wynne-hints-at-greater-authority-for-government-architect-20150311-141boa">this piece</a> for the Australian Financial Review.

<iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/JK0CbayWZDQ" width="560"></iframe>

However there is more to fixing the OVGA than just its place in the family tree of influence. It has been almost 12 months since the last Victorian Government Architect, Geoffrey London who is featured in the video interview above, gave notice of his resignation of the role. Since September 2014 the chair has been empty. Now is the time to appoint the next Victorian Government Architect. It would be a very simple step to take and would immediately help the process of finalizing the controversial yet urgently needed minimum apartment standards. The solution could even be to promote Jill Garner the (brilliant) Associate Government Architect to the position of VGA and then hire a new replacement associate.

The other urgent piece of business at the OVGA is to address the funding of the Victorian Design Review Panel. Since 1 July 2014 the OVGA has been forced to go to a watered down ‘user pays’ service which limits the availability of this important review process.

<blockquote>
While a formal cost benefit analysis has not been undertaken due to the difficulty quantifying the benefits conferred by the VDRP, where these have been able to be quantified the benefits considerably outweigh the costs. Feedback from program stakeholders and reviewed project case studies supports this assessment, with 96% of surveyed case study participants indicating that the benefits of participating in the design review process outweighed the costs.
<cite>Victorian Design Review Panel: Program Evaluation, <a href="http://www.ovga.vic.gov.au/images/VDRP_Evaluation_Report_Exec_Summary.pdf">independent review by SGS Economics and Planning</a></cite>
</blockquote>

The cost of bad design can be extreme and persists for the life of the building. If we can design buildings better by subjecting them to thorough expert scrutiny, we can substantially reduce these negative consequences.

R+BA score: 1 mark* (out of 3 available)

* This presumes the OVGA is in fact restructured into reporting directly to the office of Premier and Cabinet

<h2>Flinders Street Station</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/1160_26-07-2013_6297.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="HASSELL + Herzog &amp; de Meuron's winning bid"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="336" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/1160_26-07-2013_6297.jpg?itok=uFMSIT49" title="HASSELL + Herzog &amp; de Meuron's winning bid" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>HASSELL + Herzog &amp; de Meuron's winning bid</figcaption></figure>In 2013 Melbourne’s most important landmark was the subject of a major international architecture competition to scope the future possibilities for improving the site. This was a fantastic initiative by the Liberal government which enabled a genuine discussion about real possibilities for the future. Despite subsequent criticism from some quarters, the competition was very good value for the taxpayer and generated thousands of response from an engaged public.

Since then it has been left as an unanswered question as to if the winning design will be built. The Liberal Government never promised that there would be funds available and as time passed it seemed more and more likely that the project would not get off the ground.

With the change of government came the predictable move to permanently shelve the redevelopment plans. This decision is a real win for small picture, short term thinking. This building is not just a piece of infrastructure like a power station or toll road. It is our most iconic and identifiable piece of architecture that holds far more value as an icon than as a train station.

In the only upside to this saga the new government has committed $100 Million in funds to seal the leaking roof, restore the facade and upgrade the most talked about toilets in Melbourne. Casual observers of this announcement may have been misled into thinking that this funding would also extend to restoring the ballroom and other interior spaces. Upon reading the fine print however, this funding will only extend to preparing a business case for interior restoration.

The final point to address with Labor’s less than ideal handling of Flinders Street Station’s future are the unfortunate comments that were spoken by both Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan aimed to discredit the former Government.

<blockquote>
The Liberals held an indulgent colouring-in competition while the station fell apart. We’re actually getting on with the job.
<cite>Jacinta Allan Minister for transport and employment</cite>
</blockquote>

Describing the enormous effort of some of the world’s very best architects including Pritzker Prize winners as mere ‘colouring-in’ is an absurdly offensive attack on both Architects and Architecture. It is hard to recall an instance where an entire industry or profession has been so needlessly dismissed as frivolous in order to score political points.

R+BA score: 1/2 a mark* (out of 2 available)

* half a mark was deducted for the ‘colouring-in’ remarks

<h2>Infrastructure</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/western-portal-copy_1.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="East West Link"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="317" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/western-portal-copy_1.jpg?itok=67DUiq3w" title="East West Link" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>East West Link</figcaption></figure>The change of government has seen a most significant change to the State’s infrastructure policy. The 2014 Victorian State Election was described by the Prime Minister as “a referendum on the East West Link”. This has turned out to be quite true with the Labor Government standing firm on their pre-election promise of not building the toll road.

This measure alone is undoubtedly a game changer and a lifeline for Victoria. At a price of $1 million per metre and returning just 45 cents of benefit for every dollar contributed, the East West Link would have crippled Melbourne financially whilst destroying several communities and devastating Royal Park. Whilst the political decision seems to have been finalized there is still much work to be done to permanently prevent this poorly conceived project from making a comeback.

Firstly the Government is still in negotiations with the East West Consortium to cancel the contract without paying for the $1 Billion + super profits that the previous government was so happy to sign away in their morally bankrupt side letter. If this negotiation fails Daniel Andrews has implied strongly that he will take action in the Parliament to legislate a solution. Obviously the consortium should be reimbursed for expenses already incurred. As for claiming to be eligible for profits on a project that they never built, this is exactly the kind of big corporate behavior that sickens hard-working, honest individuals.

The entire East West Link saga can be traced back to politicians bypassing crucial expert analysis to fast track a project for political gain. In order to reduce the undue political interference from future infrastructure investment, the Andrews Government has already begun setting up Infrastructure Victoria. This new body was one of the six issues lobbied for by the Australian Institute of Architects Victorian Chapter prior to the election. The idea of this body will be to act as an independent adviser to the government, which will hopefully also see a logical prioritization of projects based on actual publicly released and positive business cases.

In the final piece of good infrastructure news, the Melbourne Metro Rail Tunnel has been given the new Government’s backing to proceed. According to <a href="http://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/project_assessments/files/2013/VIC_Melbourne_Metro_Brief.pdf">Infrastructure Australia</a> the Melbourne Metro Rail tunnel has a Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) of 1.2 meaning that for every dollar spent we can expect $1.20 benefit. There has also been public comment by the Premier suggesting that the preferred procurement method may also be shifting from Public Private Partnerships to having construction funded by the Government and then sold off to private operators. Given the currently very low interest rates it seems difficult to fault that logic.

R+BA score: 3 a marks (out of 3 available)

<h2>The Red + Black Scorecard</h2>

All in all it has been a solid start for the new government. Having spoken with various stakeholders who have been dealing directly with senior members of the Government it seems that there is a cautious optimism about the direction we are heading.

The Red+Black Scorecard is as follows:

<table border="1" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="1" style="width: 100%">
<thead><tr>
<th>Action</th>
			<th>Score</th>
		</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Consultation with AIA</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Consultation with ARBV</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>OVGA reporting to Premiers Department</td>
			<td>1*</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Appoint Victorian Government Architect</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fund Victorian Design Review Panel</td>
			<td>-</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Funding the Restoration of Flinders Street Station</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Flinders Street Station Design Competition</td>
			<td>-0.5</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cancel East West Link</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Create Independent Infrastructure Body</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Work towards Melbourne Metro Rail Tunnel</td>
			<td>1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total</td>
			<td>6.5/10</td>
		</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
* This presumes the OVGA is in fact restructured into reporting directly to the office of Premier and Cabinet

<h2>Issues and questions for the next 100 days</h2>

Whilst it has been a breathe of fresh air to have a government willing to have intelligent consultation with architects, there is much work to do over the coming years to address several areas of concern. Minimum apartment standards continue to be a very hot topic which will require real leadership to see through. The OVGA will have significant role to play here, which is why the appointment of a new Government Architect must be a priority.

The Labor Government has also flagged potential changes to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal appeal process for planning decisions. This will be a very interesting discussion to have on where the line in the sand is. On the one hand is the right of an individual or company to build a project and on the other hand is the right of an individual or company to object.

Perhaps one of the biggest issues we will have to face up to is housing affordability. The current system is pricing families out of the inner and middle suburbs, pushing them to the limits and forcing a high dependence on car travel. Single people and those in creative or caring industries are also finding quality housing difficult or impossible to obtain. The last thing Melbourne needs is a city like London where only the very wealthy are welcome to reside. If the new Labor Government can make inroads with this, they will well and truly deserve a second term.

Michael Smith is Director of Melbourne architecture firm Atelier Red + Black. This article originally appeared on <a href="https://theredandblackarchitect.wordpress.com/">The Red and Black Architect blog</a>

Lead image courtesy thecourier.com.au.
</body></html>

redblackarchitect

The Andrews Government, 100 Day Report Card

<html><body>
Following his narrow loss at the recent Victorian state election, Clem Newton-Brown has launched a new property consultancy, pushing through difficult planning applications.
He was a former planning barrister before winning the marginal seat of Prahran for the Liberal Party. Gracious in defeat, Clem Newton-Brown lost to the Greens, who he will no doubt continue to battle with on planning issues.
Whitemark Property and Planning offers to maximise land owner's value by reviewing the potential at the beginning of the planning process, all the way through the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT).
"Planning does not need to be confrontational and much can be done to get sensible development permits through with community support and without the angst and uncertainty of VCAT appeals," Newton-Brown said.
He has been pro-actively suggesting and reviewing sites, including a dual apartment block on Clara Street in South Yarra.
"This site has attracted a lot of developer interest due to its large open air carpark at the rear and three street frontages," he noted.
"However, it is located in the Neighbourhood Residential zone and is incapable of further development, either to the rear or on top.
"The only options for adding value appear to be landscaping and creating private open space for ground floor tenants and attaching balconies for the upper levels."
There's also <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.facebook.com/pages/Whitemark-Property-and-Planning/1587975278085100" target="_blank">some comments</a> he had made on a South Melbourne development site at 201-209 Ferrars Street.
"This is a really interesting opportunity for an investor with some vision," he said.
"It is located in the Commercial 1 zone and the IM is suggesting 3 commercial tenancies and 23 apartments over three levels above.
"I think this is quite conservative given the site is in the transition zone between Fishermans Bend and the older residential areas of South Melbourne.
"It is far enough away from the residential areas for greater height to not have an impact on existing neighbours.
"Due to the long and skinny site the units would have great internal amenity," he noted adding the agent was quoting $2.5 plus.
Newton-Brown has personal expertise having developed the Ponyfish Island cafe on a flood-prone island set under the Southgate footbridge.
Then in 2008, he offloaded a development-sensitive site on the banks of the Yarra River in Toorak with a permit.
<video width="938" height="100" src="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/2015/03/05/Caller%20JOHN%20040315.mp3" preload="none"></video>
</body></html>

Former Liberal politician Clem Newton-Brown establishes Whitemark Property & Planning consultancy

<html><body>
As Australia faces the reality of life after its mining boom, now more than ever it’s vital that we embark on a path of prosperity and sound government – just don’t hold your breath (just yet).
First and foremost it’s imperative that NSW embarks on the greatest infrastructure expenditure in the state’s history – at the end of the day the upcoming election is all about economic reform. 
Based on the recent election results in Victoria and Queensland the word ‘privatisation’ has indeed become a dirty word. In the case of the Baird government strategy the proceeds from the sale of state ownership of the electricity network would be directed to the generation of pivotal capital works projects and not state debt reduction.
A 2013 report on the Electricity Network Regulation the Productivity Commission announced that electricity prices had risen 70% in real terms over the previous five years with structural problems most apparent in NSW. The Productivity Commission went on to say: “There are strong arguments for privatisation of those businesses. There is no evidence that the productivity, reliability, quality or cost performance of private – sector electricity network businesses is worse than their public sector equivalents. To the contrary, the evidence in Australia and internationally suggests that such private sector enterprises are more efficient.”
NSW Labor proposes to tax business more then cut and defer major projects whilst doing next to nothing to fix congestion in Sydney. Congestion is exactly what determines property prices in Sydney, which is why I have said if you own real estate within a 10 kilometre radius of the Sydney CBD you have nothing to worry about.
A recent report commissioned by the Property Council of NSW has found that Sydney is facing a housing crisis with an additional 190,000 homes needed to be constructed over the next 10 years. The report identified that since 2005 an average of just 17,002 homes had been approved by Sydney’s 43 councils each year. From a business perspective you’re not going to attract new housing projects unless you are rolling out massive new infrastructure community platforms.
<a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2015/02/23-02-2015-9-11-41-AM.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-389483" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2015/02/23-02-2015-9-11-41-AM.jpg" alt="23-02-2015 9-11-41 AM" width="463" height="477"></a>
The above graph clearly identifies what happens to property prices when you’re closer to the CBD and highlights what happens when governments drop crucial infrastructure spending – <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/2/23/infrastructure/australias-train-nowhere" target="_blank" title="Australia’s train to nowhere. ">Australia’s train to nowhere. </a>More than anything we see glaring highlights as to what happens when governments fail to invest in crucial areas such as public transport. As a result house prices to those areas located within that crucial 10 kilometre radius of the CBD skyrocket.
NSW faces an additional 1.600 million people requiring housing over the next two decades – which in itself explains why now more than ever before infrastructure has to be the key ingredient into guaranteeing NSW’s prosperity into the future. Privatisation should not be a dirty word rather the dirty word clearly is lack of infrastructure spending by past NSW governments.
Sydney must absorb Newcastle, Wollongong and western Sydney into its business model by creating a world class metropolis. Given what’s been achieved in other countries there is no excuse why Sydney does not have a very fast train that connects all the cities.
Given that investors today are getting next to no return given the record low cash rate – investors can purchase syndicates that would allow them to invest in infrastructure projects <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2015/2/25/infrastructure/neat-fix-politics-infrastructure-funding" target="_blank" title="a neat fix to the politics of infrastructure funding.">a neat fix to the politics of infrastructure funding.</a>
Given that the self-managed superannuation funds are driving investment property in NSW due to a lack of choice such a proposal to attract these funds with infrastructure investment is a brilliant and a long overdue alternative. Naturally the big superannuation funds want as much of this pie as they can get so the state governments must offer allocations to ensure that everyone has equal investment opportunities.
From an investment perspective NSW can easily offer thousands and thousands of critical infrastructure investment funds for investors to diversify as against relying solely on the real estate markets.
Of course nothing can happen if we have a change in government given the alternative is simply too scary to contemplate. If NSW had previously had a strong infrastructure platform property prices would be nowhere near as high as they are today.
If the Baird government is successful at next month’s election and they stick to their infrastructure platforms there is a strong possibility they could become the most successful government in NSW history.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Next month’s NSW election is the most important ever: Robert Simeon

<html><body>
Prime Minister Tony Abbott today said he wanted to enforce the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) residential rules "because, obviously, the last thing we want to be doing is pricing young home buyers out of the market".
He told Alan Jones on 2GB that Kelly O’Dwyer, as the chairman of a parliamentary committee was looking at the fact that the former Labor government never enforced the prohibitions on foreign purchasers of existing residential properties.
"Now, what sort of a government has rules and never actually enforces them?" <a href="https://www.pm.gov.au/media/2015-02-06/interview-alan-jones-radio-2gb-0" target="_blank">he said</a>.
Tony Abbott foreshadowed within a few weeks his government would be putting the policy that he took to the election into action.
The Australian Financial Review wrote earlier this week the government’s response to the ­parliamentary report on the issue was discussed by cabinet on Tuesday and Wednesday. 
“There has been evidence which will emerge over time that there has been a significant increase in the number of foreigners buying Australian residential real estate unlawfully,” Treasurer Joe Hockey told Fairfax Radio.
“It hasn’t been enforced because it never was enforced under the previous government... You’re about to see that change.”
A parliamentary inquiry led by Liberal MP Kelly O’Dwyer, who was recently promoted to Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasurer, handed in its report to the government last November.
The report actually found that foreign investment was, on the whole, of benefit to the country and was not the main cause of any recent steep increases in property prices.
It did, however lash out at the FIRB fair failing in monitoring and enforcing the laws.
There have been no prosecutions made against foreign buyers for illegal residential property purchases since 2006.
One of the inquiry's key recommendations was the creation of a national register linking records of land transfers with citizenship and migration residency status, to better track of foreign investment.
The government’s moves on foreign investment in real estate were heralded in ­Tony Abbott’s speech to the National Press Club last Monday.
“I am a friend of foreign investment but it has to come on our terms and for our benefit,” Abbott said.
Australians were "anxious" about the country's economic sovereignty, especially foreign purchases of agricultural land," Mr Abbott said.
"And better enforcement of the rules against foreign purchases of existing homes so that young people are not priced out of the market."
The national initiative will rely on state government co-operation in amending transfer purchase documentation.
Property Observer gleans all states, barring South Australian, have agreed to the federal government's wishes.
</body></html>

Tony Abbott suggests foreigners pricing out young home buyers

<html><body>
The Australian Electoral Commission released financial disclosure data for the 2013-14 financial year earlier this week, revealing that the single largest donor to the ALP was an unknown China-based person named Zichun Wang. 
Crikey can reveal that Zichun Wang appears to be the deputy general manager of Chinese property development firm Ever Bright Group, responsible for several large developments in Melbourne’s eastern suburbs.
Wang gave $850,000 to the national ALP Secretariat in two parcels that year, the largest donation to either party.
An article about the “mystery Chinese donor” in <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/mystery-chinese-donor-zi-chun-wang-tops-political-donations-with-850000-gift-to-labor-20150202-133ofe" target="_blank">Fairfax</a> provoked much speculation as to the identity of the generous figure, with Business Spectator <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/2/3/china/chinese-man-tops-list-australian-political-donors?utm_content=SocialFlow&amp;utm_campaign=EditorialSF&amp;utm_source=BusinessSpectator&amp;utm_medium=Twitter">discovering</a> links between Wang and Australian real estate investment.
But Crikey can reveal the man behind the money appears to be Melbourne-based Ever Bright Group’s deputy general manager.
Ever Bright Group is responsible for building a range of large property developments primarily across Melbourne and Shijiazhuang, the largest city in Hebei province. Property developers have been banned from donating to political parties in New South Wales since 2009, but there are no Victorian or federal rules against it.
It is unclear whether Ever Bright Group is state owned, though there is a Chinese state-owned conglomerate of the same name. The company’s published history on its website suggests it may be linked to the state-owned China State Construction Engineering Corporation. Careers website <a href="https://company.zhaopin.com/%E6%B2%B3%E5%8C%97%E6%B0%B8%E6%98%8C%E6%88%BF%E5%9C%B0%E4%BA%A7%E5%BC%80%E5%8F%91%E6%9C%89%E9%99%90%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E4%BF%9D%E5%AE%9A%E5%88%86%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8_CC432198127.htm" target="_blank">Zhaopin</a> lists EBG as a private company.
The contact address given on the Australian Electoral Commission disclosure form for the donor is given as a housing block for retired Communist Party apparatchiks and bureaucrats in Shijiazhuang, as well as the Hebei Provincial Development and Reform Commission.
When Crikey called Ever Bright Group’s Melbourne office, the receptionist said Wang was currently in China, but gave the same contact email address as that supplied on the AEC return form.
The China-based phone number listed on the AEC form rings out.
The company’s website features a <a href="https://www.ebgcn.com/news1_details.aspx?nid=12021" target="_blank">news story</a> from March 2014 of Wang visiting Melbourne’s Carey Baptist Grammar school. Another <a href="https://ebgcn.com/news1_details.aspx?nid=12040">article</a> shows EBG Chairman Yuan Wan Yong meeting with Prime Minister Tony Abbott and then-Victorian premier Denis Napthine in June 2014.
Ever Bright Group’s Melbourne developments have included the controversial Stonington Mansion Estate in Malvern. The estate was previously used by Deakin University as a campus, but the university sold it to private developers in 2006 in the face of protests from Stonnington City Council and former federal treasurer Peter Costello. Ever Bright paid $30 million for it in late 2010.
The company is also responsible for the $110 million Lucia luxury apartments in South Yarra. Ever Bright’s website says the development should have been completed by late 2014.
<a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/2/3/china/chinese-man-tops-list-australian-political-donors?utm_content=SocialFlow&amp;utm_campaign=EditorialSF&amp;utm_source=BusinessSpectator&amp;utm_medium=Twitter" target="_blank">As revealed by </a><a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/news/2015/2/3/china/chinese-man-tops-list-australian-political-donors?utm_content=SocialFlow&amp;utm_campaign=EditorialSF&amp;utm_source=BusinessSpectator&amp;utm_medium=Twitter" target="_blank">Business Spectator</a>, a search of usernames attached to Wang’s email address reveals a series of posts on forums by a Hebei-based user dating back to 2007 showing an interest in Australian property investments.
One comment stated: “Very interesting! I’m interested in investing, and will keep an eye on it!”
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.crikey.com.au/" target="_blank">Crikey</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Meet the mysterious Chinese property developer giving a motza to the ALP

With $91 million in personal property holdings, are Queensland's politicans really unbiased?

<html><body>
When I was younger, especially a student at the University of Melbourne, free very much was the magic word.

Buy one Whopper get one free at Hungry Jacks, a free yoghurt at Museum Station, or a free beer at the University knitting club recruitment drive. If it was free, it rocked. I mean, I even emptied an entire Gatorade vending machine once, when it was accidentally spitting out its sugary goodness devoid of charge, much to the disdain of my then basketball coach. A six month supply of sporting enhancement never tasted so good!

However we all grow up, and most come to appreciate value over cost. That's not to say that we're still not seduced by free every once in a while (hands up who doesn't have a set of steak knives at home that they have never used?), and unfortunately that includes governments. Especially ones in an election year.

Trailing in the polls, Dennis Napthine went on a budget spending spree and included two 'gems': scrapping Zone 2 and free tram travel in the CBD.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/freetramzonemap_800x540.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Melbourne Free Tram Zone Map"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="392" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/freetramzonemap_800x540.jpg?itok=V94szgHy" title="Melbourne Free Tram Zone Map" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Melbourne Free Tram Zone Map</figcaption></figure>The Free Tram Zone, which came into effect on January 1 this year, is shown above. Like some bright sparks on Twitter noted, if it doesn't immediately make you sing 'we all live in a green submarine', nothing will! Its circumference is basically the route of the City Circle, with a few added areas like Queen Victoria Market and an expanded Docklands.

Looking at it more deeply, it really is hard to ascertain who this will actually benefit. Most work day commuters would be coming from outside this zone, meaning they will still have to pay. It has been argued that tourists will benefit, allowing them to avoid the 'confusion' of having to use a Myki. However even the least adventurous of tourists would travel beyond these boundaries, with the key hotspots of the sporting precinct, Fitzroy and St Kilda all sitting outside the free zone. Given they would much more likely be unsure of the boundary than locals, they are also left exposed to fines for not having a valid ticket. Welcome to Melbourne: here, have a $80 on the spot fine!

<img alt="" height="149" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/pictures/article-images/free_tram_zone_sign.jpg" width="338">

And that brings us to the most problematic demographic: people who actually live inside this zone.

One of the main attractions of CBD living is meant to be that you can throw away the car keys and walk to work. Walking, aside from having obvious health benefits, is also the ultimate form of public transport. No cost, with no capacity or frequency issues to worry about. However as tram travel is also now free, it is just an added incentive for these people to get lazy and jump on a tram instead. So aside from the social cost of a less active population, all we end up with is more crowded trams.

In other words, the only mode shift this brilliant plan has brought us is from walking to public transport. It won't bring us a single extra cent in revenue (but will cost us $100 million, combined with the Zone 2 change), and we won't take a single car off the road doing it. In fact we run the risk of the opposite; if trams become too overcrowded and slow, commuters may be tempted to get back in their cars and drive to work. A retrogressive policy if ever I've seen one.

The plan to 'scrap' zone 2 also makes little sense. Despite Napthine’s bleating about equity, it is anything but equitable. Having users pay the same fare from Pakenham to the city (56km) as from say Brunswick to the city (10km) is counter intuitive and grossly unfair; commuters from the outer suburbs incur a much greater running and maintenance cost on the system than those from the inner suburbs.

Having everyone pay the same fare is tantamount to halving the cost of petrol in the suburbs, so that people driving from Dandenong to the city pay the same petrol bill as those driving from Caulfield! This of course would be outrageous; as it would be if the government artificially deflated the cost of housing in the inner suburbs to make that the same across all of Melbourne. Having a flat fare will also further encourage suburban sprawl; a huge problem already exacerbated by Matthew Guy’s reckless decision to extend Melbourne’s already bulging urban boundary.

Frustratingly, the perceived political gain is limited anyway. As discussed in Alastair's blog, cost is usually not a driver when it comes to people deciding to use public transport. According to research conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, guess where 'cost' ranked in the top 10 reasons for not using public transport? It didn't! How many times will we hear people say "public transport is still crap, but that's OK cause it's cheap now"? Said no one ever!

The fact is, people will accept this 'discounted' price as the norm after a very short amount of time, and go back to complaining about the deficiencies of the system like the price drop never happened. Worse still, this will most likely just jack up the price of a Zone 1 ticket, just like what happened when Zone 3 was scrapped in 2007, making any savings even more trivial and temporary.

<table border="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%">
<caption>Top 10 reasons for not using public transport on usual trip to work or full-time study: proportion (%) of persons who did not use public transport (Australian Bureau of Statistics: 4602.0.55.002 - Environmental Issues: Waste Management, Transport and Motor Vehicle Usage, March 2012)</caption>
	<thead><tr>
<th>Reason</th>
			<th>NSW</th>
			<th>Vic.</th>
			<th>QLD</th>
			<th>SA</th>
			<th>WA</th>
			<th>Tas.</th>
			<th>NT</th>
			<th>ACT</th>
			<th>Aust.</th>
		</tr></thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>No service available at all</td>
			<td>28.4</td>
			<td>28.2</td>
			<td>35.3</td>
			<td>30.3</td>
			<td>31.8</td>
			<td>37.5</td>
			<td>33.8</td>
			<td>7.5</td>
			<td>30.2</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Convenience/comfort/privacy in private vehicle</td>
			<td>27.5</td>
			<td>26.8</td>
			<td>20.0</td>
			<td>27.0</td>
			<td>27.0</td>
			<td>16.9</td>
			<td>17.2</td>
			<td>45.9</td>
			<td>25.7</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>No service available at right/convenient time</td>
			<td>21.2</td>
			<td>22.9</td>
			<td>26.9</td>
			<td>19.4</td>
			<td>23.6</td>
			<td>25.7</td>
			<td>31.4</td>
			<td>22.0</td>
			<td>23.2</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Travel time too long</td>
			<td>16.9</td>
			<td>18.6</td>
			<td>13.3</td>
			<td>16.1</td>
			<td>14.3</td>
			<td>6.8</td>
			<td>8.2</td>
			<td>30.5</td>
			<td>16.2</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Own vehicle needed before/during/after hours</td>
			<td>11.1</td>
			<td>8.3</td>
			<td>9.7</td>
			<td>11.1</td>
			<td>9.8</td>
			<td>7.6</td>
			<td>9.6</td>
			<td>19.7</td>
			<td>10.0</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carry equipment/tools/passengers</td>
			<td>9.8</td>
			<td>7.8</td>
			<td>6.1</td>
			<td>6.5</td>
			<td>8.3</td>
			<td>3.6</td>
			<td>6.6</td>
			<td>10.7</td>
			<td>8.0</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Public transport services too far from home</td>
			<td>6.4</td>
			<td>5.2</td>
			<td>5.7</td>
			<td>5.4</td>
			<td>4.4</td>
			<td>3.4</td>
			<td>5.6</td>
			<td>2.9</td>
			<td>5.5</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Company or employer's vehicle needed during work/study hours</td>
			<td>3.2</td>
			<td>4.2</td>
			<td>4.3</td>
			<td>4.4</td>
			<td>5.7</td>
			<td>4.3</td>
			<td>4.7</td>
			<td>2.3</td>
			<td>4.1</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Too close to work/study to use public transport</td>
			<td>3.6</td>
			<td>3.3</td>
			<td>2.3</td>
			<td>3.6</td>
			<td>2.8</td>
			<td>6.3</td>
			<td>3.1</td>
			<td>1.7</td>
			<td>3.2</td>
		</tr>
<tr>
<td>Other</td>
			<td>2.5</td>
			<td>3.9</td>
			<td>3.3</td>
			<td>3.0</td>
			<td>3.7</td>
			<td>2.2</td>
			<td>3.3</td>
			<td>2.6</td>
			<td>3.2</td>
		</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Unfortunately for Victorians, Labor chose to back this policy for fear that Napthine would whack them over the head with it; another case of good politics, bad policy. They could have easily got on the front foot here and put the $100 million a year these two policy dogs are costing us towards something else: new trams, Southland station (it could have gold plated toilets at that price), Melton electrification, tea cosies advertising the dangers of eating breakfast cereals past their used by date. Hell, anything would have been a better investment.

Either way, we are stuck with it now. If they thought it was politically tricky not backing this policy, try undoing it if it goes really wrong and overcrowding becomes unmanageable. The aforementioned limited gain of making it free/cheaper is unfortunately not true in reverse; people will sook like a hipster baby not allowed to have a salted caramel lollypop if we take their god given right to free trams away from them.

So next time you have to wait three trams before getting on because of freeloaders, have a think if you are really better off. And next time you walk past a broken vending machine spitting out free Gatorades, make sure you are carrying a big bag!
</body></html>

Politics

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Politics

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News