Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

Joel Robinson

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

IN BRIEF

<ul>
	<li>
	Just three double-storey Sky Homes sit at the top of The Waterline, each with its own private marina berth and rooftop terrace.
	</li>
	<li>
	Construction on The Waterline is complete, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.
	</li>
	<li>
	Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and are priced from $3.65 million.
	</li>
</ul>

<hr />
Lewis Land has opened the first completed sky home for inspection at Harbour Shores, giving buyers their first opportunity to step inside one of just three double-storey residences crowning The Waterline.

Each sky home comes with its own private marina berth, rooftop terrace and Broadwater views, combining the scale of a larger home with direct access to the boating lifestyle that underpins the wider <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/harbour-shores-biggera-waters-564-oxley-drive-biggera-waters-qld-4216">Harbour Shores</a> masterplan.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366708]

Lewis Land Head of Development Michael Long said the inclusion of a berth with every Sky Home had become increasingly valuable as marina access across the Gold Coast tightened.

“Marina berths are becoming increasingly difficult to secure across the Gold Coast, so including one with every Sky Home makes this a genuinely rare offering,” Long said.

“The private 70-berth marina will accommodate boats up to 12 metres in length and is positioned just 2.5 kilometres from the Broadwater, placing the open ocean only 15 minutes away.

“Being able to step out of your home onto your boat is a rare luxury, and it’s something residents here can look forward to when it opens later this year.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=113271 project_image_fid=366709]

The display opening comes as construction completes on The Waterline, with the first residents expected to move in from mid-October.

The three Sky Homes range from 282 sqm to 367 sqm and each feature three bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive kitchens with butler's pantries and large balconies taking in the Broadwater outlook.

Each residence also has three secure basement car spaces and additional storage.

“This is the first opportunity the Gold Coast has had to step into Harbour Shores and see, touch and feel what we’re bringing to life here,” Long said.

“There are only three Sky Homes within The Waterline, ranging in size from 282sqm to 367sqm, with each residence featuring three large bedrooms, three bathrooms, multiple living zones, expansive custom-built kitchens with butler’s pantry, and large balconies capturing Broadwater views.”

<img alt="Harbour Shores" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bab65e10-4fab-45e1-92d8-fc56e2ab98ff" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-25%20at%202.00.16%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=XT8q76LsPkw3cYTsvN3JfFDaPLud90PN" />

Residents of The Waterline will have access to a private pool, along with Harbour Shores' wider collection of amenity including a lagoon pool, social clubhouse, tennis court, gym, yoga facilities and sauna.

Lewis Land partnered with Studio Collective to furnish the completed display, with the interiors designed to demonstrate how the residences could function as permanent homes rather than simply as show apartments.

Studio Collective Director Melissa Park said the surrounding waterways informed the interiors, but in a more restrained way than a traditional coastal scheme.

“We drew inspiration from the canals and coastal surrounds, but our approach was to interpret that subtly through layered materials and a grounded palette of earthy tones, rather than literal coastal references,” Park said.

“We introduced hero moments of green and teal to reference the surrounding waterways, while mirrored elements help reflect natural light.

“The result is a residence that feels elevated yet comfortable, somewhere buyers can genuinely imagine themselves living, entertaining and unwinding.”

Sky Homes are priced from $3.65 million.

Lewis Land is also offering private marina berths with The Residences, its limited collection of three and four-bedroom villas positioned directly along the Harbour Shores waterfront boardwalk.

Three-bedroom villas are priced from $2.99 million, while four-bedroom residences start from $3.19 million.

Harbour Shores is being marketed by Colliers International.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=113271]

Lewis Land opens sky home display as The Waterline completes at Harbour Shores

St Vincent de Paul Society Housing Australia has filed plans for a major mixed-use housing precinct on the southern edge of the North Sydney CBD, adding another significant proposal to a pocket around North Sydn​ey Station that is quickly becoming one of the LGA's busiest development zones.

The State Significant Development Application covers a 5,990 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1-19-mackenzie-street-lavender-bay-nsw-2060">1-19 MacKenzie Street and 211 Blues Point Road in Lavender Bay</a>, immediately south of Nor​th Sydney Station and between the commercial core and the lower-rise Lavender Bay Heritage Conservation Area.

Designed by Wardle, the proposal would deliver a new residential tower comprising 88 build-to-sell apartments and 19 affordable apartments, alongside a separate co-living building with 57 rooms and a building manager's studio.

It would also see the significant restoration and upgrade of St Francis Xavier Catholic Church, the adaptive reuse of the former school building, new parish facilities, retail, a new public square and around 1,000 sqm of publicly accessible open space.

<img alt="Vinnies North Sydney" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d5dd7f87-a617-463e-b577-17541e01f0e9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.13%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=4R8TsFN3P_LrrXO2HswTOIrx2blil8lh" />

The project is seeking a concurrent rezoning of the site to R4 High Density Residential and an increase in the maximum building height to allow a tower reaching RL120, or up to 20 storeys. The proposal was progressed through the NSW Government's Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

The build-to-sell component will be weighted toward larger apartments, with just six one-bedroom apartments compared with 31 two-beds, 43 three-beds and eight four-bedroom residences.

The 19 affordable apartments will comprise two studios, 15 one-bedroom apartments and two two-bedroom apartments, taking the total apartment component to 107 residences before the 58 co-living rooms are included.

<img alt="Vnnies" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7d568ca5-cb90-4e18-96c6-d9795dba0c56" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.10.05%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GY2R5M9VtQh0EKy1vajaea19PSLOPuRD" />

Wardle's design for the Vinnies site has sought to negotiate that emerging high-rise context while retaining the lower-scale character of MacKenzie Street and the adjoining heritage conservation area.

The main building adopts a three-storey podium and tower arrangement, with the podium aligned to the ridgeline and front setback of St Francis Xavier Church.&nbsp;Wardle has designed the podium with colonnades, seating, recessed entries and active ground-floor frontages, with sandstone-toned precast concrete and face brick referencing the materiality of the existing church.

The tower then steps back eight metres to the south and six metres to the north before rising in a sculpted form comprising four interlocking quadrants. Wardle has also introduced rounded forms and chamfered corners to reduce the tower's perceived bulk and improve view sharing with neighbouring development sites.

Resident facilities and outdoor areas are planned at the separation between the podium and tower at Level 3, oriented toward Sydney Harbour and the CBD skyline.

The tower itself will feature a glass reinforced concrete facade, with recessed balconies and deep reveals used both to provide shading and privacy and frame views toward the harbour and city. The lower levels take a different architectural approach, using brick and sandstone-toned finishes intended to establish a stronger relationship with St Francis Xavier Church. The Church itself will be conserved and upgraded for its continued use, while the former school building will be adaptively reused as part of the co-living component.

<img alt="Lavendar Bay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2d4418ad-90aa-4d49-af93-c80b140aea80" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%209.09.47%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Kv4gzbsACaGvZSRuaqcfGC54jEJRXIDJ" />

&nbsp;

The proposal adds to an increasingly concentrated pipeline of residential development around Blue Street, MacKenzie Street and Lavender Bay.

Just west of the site, Central Element lodged plans earlier this year for one of the most significant residential developments proposed in Lavender Bay in recent years.

Central Element's SJB-designed scheme at 64-66 Lavender Street and 3-7 Middlemiss Street would deliver 163 apartments across two towers rising 23 and 32 storeys, replacing five existing apartment buildings containing 32 homes. The project also forms part of the Housing Delivery Authority pathway.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-central-element-reveals-lavender-bay-apartment-plans?utm_source=chatgpt.com" rel="noopener" target="_blank">First look: Central Element reveals Lavender Bay apartment plans</a>

Immediately around North Sy​dney Station, another two significant proposals have emerged at 5 and 15 Blue Street.

Zurich Australian Insurance Properties is seeking to adaptively reuse its longstanding commercial building at 5 Blue Street, directly above North Sydney Station, rather than demolishing the structure.

Its SSDA proposes converting the building into a 14-storey mixed-use development with 62 apartments and 86 co-living rooms, together with ground-floor retail and a major refurbishment of Blue Street Plaza. The application is currently at the Response to Submissions stage.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-zurich-targets-north-sydney-office-conversion-with-148-unit-proposal-above-metro-station">First look: Zurich targets North Sydney office conversion with 148-unit proposal above Metro station</a>

&nbsp;

First look: Vinnies files for 20-storey Lavender Bay apartment tower as North Sydney housing pocket heats up

When the opportunity arose for South Australian developer Palumbo to return to Kent Town, where it had previously delivered East Park Apartments and the East 
Rundle Apartments, it wasn't one the longstanding developer-builder was going to pass up.

The decision was quickly vindicated, with more than 30 apartments sold within the first month of launching <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/royal-apartments-kent-town-2-8-north-terrace-kent-town-sa-5067">Royal Apartments</a> to the market.

The 206-apartment development, which will bring significant new supply to Adelaide's tightly held eastern city fringe, also gives <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/palumbo">Palumbo</a> the opportunity to bring new life to one of Kent Town's most recognisable watering holes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376073]

Royal Apartments incorporates the historic Royal Hotel, a venue Palumbo Managing Director Daniel Palumbo said has a longstanding connection with the local community.

"Everyone in the area has history with the Royal Hotel," Palumbo told Apartments.com.au.

"It was quite an active pub and social gathering place for locals. We want to bring it back to its former glory."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376072]

The wider development will comprise two residential towers alongside the restored hotel, sitting on North Terrace opposite the Adelaide Park Lands.

For Palumbo, the project also marks a return to familiar territory.

The developer completed East Park Apartments next door more than a decade ago and jumped at the opportunity to develop in Kent Town again when the Royal Hotel site became available.

"The opportunity emerged, and we moved to secure the site," Palumbo said.

"We were approached by the previous landowner, who said they had extensive commitments in Sydney and weren't in a position to deliver the project.

"We took over the site and within six months recut the design scheme to be more in keeping with the type of development we want to bring to Adelaide.

"Now we're on the market and those changes have really resonated with local buyers."

That has translated into a strong start to sales, with 33 apartments transacting in the project's first 35 days.

Palumbo said the early purchaser profile had been consistent with the group's traditional focus on owner-occupiers rather than investor-led apartment stock.

"Local owner-occupiers have always been our market," he said.

"There are always some investors, but we've never developed what would be called traditional development stock. Owner-occupiers are very much our market."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376068]

The buyer mix has been diverse so far, with downsizers and younger professionals both accounting for a significant portion of early sales.

South Australia's current stamp duty settings, which allow&nbsp;eligible homeowners in South Australia aged 60 savings of up to $103,830 on stamp duty when they downsize to a new property valued at up to $2 million,&nbsp;have helped encourage downsizer activity, while younger buyers in their late 20s and early 30s have been attracted to the opportunity to live immediately outside the CBD while still being able to walk into the city.



Location has been a major part of the proposition for both buyer cohorts.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376075]

Royal Apartments sits on North Terrace directly opposite the Adelaide Park Lands, with residents able to walk through the parklands toward the East End, Rundle Street and Rundle Mall.

Apartments have been positioned to capture views across the parklands, Adelaide skyline, Botanic Gardens and Adelaide Hills.

Palumbo believes the scarcity of developable land along this section of the Park Lands makes the site particularly difficult to replicate.

"There's very few allotments on that side that can be developed," he said.

"If this location was in New York and you were sitting on Central Park, you'd be talking about a $60 million apartments."

Royal Apartments will offer a broad mix of residences, ranging from one-bedroom apartments through to four-bedroom sub-penthouses and penthouses.

Current listings include one-bedroom apartments from $680,000, while larger three and four-bedroom residences are priced around $2.5 million.

Residents will have access to a swimming pool, gym, barbecue and recreation areas, residents' lounge and dining space, and a communal deck.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6109 project_image_fid=376067]

The apartments will feature generous balconies, while secure parking, bicycle storage and storage cages will also be provided.

A porte-cochère-style arrival and drop-off area has also resonated with buyers, particularly those attracted to being able to walk into the CBD during the day while retaining secure vehicle access at home.

Palumbo is acting as developer, architect and builder on Royal Apartments, continuing the vertically integrated model it has used across its South Australian portfolio.

The group was also behind the $150 million Sofitel Adelaide, the 251-room five-star hotel and residential tower which opened in 2021.

Palumbo said Royal's launch had come at an interesting time for the broader Adelaide apartment market.

Buyer confidence had initially been impacted by uncertainty surrounding the Federal Budget and broader economic conditions, but Palumbo believes sentiment is beginning to improve against a backdrop of significant investment flowing into South Australia.

He pointed to increased activity across defence and resources, including Olympic Dam, as potential long-term drivers of the state's economy and housing market.

"Money is starting to flow into Adeliade, significant amounts as Adelaide bucks the trend of the rest of the country.," Palumbo said.

"There's a lot of activity in the economy over the next decade. I think more investment will come into this market."

Early works on Royal Apartments are expected to commence this year, with major construction activity and cranes anticipated on site from early next year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=6109]

Palumbo's return to Kent Town strikes early chord with buyers

Go-to builder-developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/graya">GRAYA</a> is continuing to bulk out its already impressive and diverse apartment portfolio across South East Queensland. Their latest milestone is securing development approval for Silk, its boutique riverfront apartment development in St Lucia.

The approval clears&nbsp;the way for the team to begin construction planning for the 22-residence project.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/silk-st-lucia-16-18-sandford-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">Silk</a> will rise 15 levels from an 810 sqm site at 16-18 Sandford Street, occupying a prominent bend of the Brisbane River with a prized northern aspect across Orleigh Park toward the Brisbane CBD.

The approved scheme will comprise 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences, continuing GRAYA's move into larger-format apartment developments targeting Brisbane's prestige owner-occupier market.

The project has been designed around the site's broad river frontage and dual-direction views, with GRAYA prioritising larger residences, privacy and outlook over apartment yield.

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="aa5c2349-f96c-4914-a812-1f2cd6827af8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.44%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=WY0vEU_7vYjeRJKQHiCwFdMxu8PvFh52" />

GRAYA Co-founder and Chief Executive Officer Rob Gray said the project had been shaped around local homeowners wanting to remain in St Lucia without maintaining a traditional family home.

"St Lucia is one of those suburbs people do not want to leave," Gray said.

"They know the river, the trees, UQ, the golf course, Toowong and Indooroopilly, and that familiarity is hard to replace.

"True riverfront opportunities here are exceptionally scarce. What we have designed at Silk is a way to stay in the suburb people love, with the scale and privacy of a private home and far less to maintain.

"This is not typical apartment product. It is a proper home on the river, and that is exactly what this market has been missing."

The approval comes as new apartment development continues to increase across the St Lucia and neighbouring Toowong corridor, although direct riverfront sites remain considerably more tightly held.

GRAYA Co-founder and Managing Director Andrew Gray said securing the approval had removed a significant element of development risk from Silk.

"Genuine riverfront sites of this quality in St Lucia are not something that comes up regularly," Gray said.

"The approval removes a substantial layer of execution risk, and the location underwrites demand in a way very few inner-city sites can.

"The fundamentals here are as strong as anything we have assessed in Brisbane."

<img alt="Silk St Lucia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d0f3d734-65e1-48e8-8ed3-2e0715ffcdd9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-26%20at%208.25.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sOLSs_jdHkXLWbBKzRyayf5BfTb2vPsD" />

Silk will see GRAYA return to a stretch of the Brisbane River where it already has recent construction experience. The vertically integrated group recently completed ARC in neighbouring Toowong as builder for developer Spyre, delivering the riverfront project on a constrained site.

GRAYA will take a different role at Silk, controlling the project from design and development through construction and aftercare under its vertically integrated model.

The development will include a gym and resident leisure areas at ground level, integrated with the river's edge.

Silk joins a growing pipeline for GRAYA across Brisbane and the Gold Coast, which includes Enclave, The Gallery, Coral and Ripple.

The developer-builder has also recently lodged plans for its largest project to date, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-silo-19-chester-street-newstead-qld-4006">The Silo</a>, a proposed <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/graya-buys-frasers-newstead-site-plans-the-silo-between-james-street-and-gasworks-precincts">$700 million mixed-use development</a> in Brisbane's James Street precinct.

Silk is expected to predominantly target local owner-occupiers and prestige buyers seeking a permanent riverfront home in Brisbane's inner west.

Registrations of interest are now open, with further details on the project and construction program to be released as it progresses.

<hr />
<h2>SILK PROJECT FACTS</h2>

Developer-builder: GRAYA

Project: Silk

Location: 16-18 Sandford Street, St Lucia

Apartments: 22

Built form: 15 levels

Site: 810 sqm riverfront holding

Mix: 16 split-floor and six full-floor residences

Status: Development approved

Next step: Construction planning underway

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152168]

GRAYA greenlit for riverfront St Lucia apartment development, Silk

Investment

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 29">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 29">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div class="page" title="Page 29">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
A new report has noted housing market conditions in the suburb of Northcote as 'excellent', with median house prices at $943,000 rising 4.2% in the last quarter. The median sale price in the local apartment market, however, declined 1.81% for the quarter to $487,500.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The Herron Todd White June Month in Review report also noted suburb of Carnegie was noted for an 'impressive' residential housing capital growth rate of 7.19% for the financial year and the highest median sales prices for for the past three years in with a $1,277,500 March investment. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Overseas investors have particular interest in prestige and off the plan investments in the Melbourne suburbs of Doncaster, Balwyn and Templestowe, often bidding against other potential purchases from overseas to enter the market above cost.
<a href="/images/2015/06/29/vic_houses.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/vic_houses.jpg" alt="" width="2205" height="1408">
 
<a href="/images/2015/06/29/vic_units.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 
<img src="/images/2015/06/29/vic_units.jpg" alt="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

mick.cee-iDmgDDAmu8

Northcote shining in Melbourne property market: Herron Todd White

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Infrastructure investment at the mature operating stage provides predictable revenue and growth in revenue above the rate of inflation, providing high levels of inflation protection.  
Infrastructure is classified as either economic or social. Economic infrastructure includes assets that facilitate transportation and telecommunications or utilities that generate and distribute power, water and gas. Social infrastructure includes assets in which services such as education, health and correctional facilities are provided.   
The majority of infrastructure assets operate in regulated environments with revenue increases linked to inflation through long term concession agreements and government contracts. There are usually high barriers to entry through large upfront establishment capital costs. Established infrastructure assets have monopoly/quasi-monopoly market positions with long useful lives of 20+ years and low operating costs.  Infrastructure assets provide services where demand is consistent or functions where demand exhibits resistance to business cycles and are linked to non-discretionary spending as a result. These attributes generate stable income returns.
Access to investment in infrastructure assets with these investment characteristics may be achieved through listed securities and unlisted funds. Listed infrastructure securities are available on the ASX and consist of companies that own economic infrastructure assets. Unlisted infrastructure funds may invest in listed securities or a portfolio of infrastructure assets either directly or through unlisted funds. Investors may also gain exposure to the infrastructure asset class through superannuation funds that invest in infrastructure through unlisted funds.
Listed and unlisted infrastructure is similar as the characteristics of the underlying physical assets are the same. Over the medium to long term returns are expected to converge between the two. Over the short term differences in pricing of listed and unlisted infrastructure investments will result in different returns and volatility of returns. Liquidity profiles differ with listed infrastructure securities readily tradeable on the ASX while unlisted funds are not liquid. Listed infrastructure securities also have a more diverse portfolio of assets both in location and type which will also affect the profile of returns.  
Australian infrastructure assets have outperformed Australian shares over the long term. In chart 1 (below) is shown the growth in value of $100 invested over 20 years from March 1995 to March 2015 in listed Australian infrastructure securities and Australian shares.
<a href="/images/2015/06/30/ev.owa.jpeg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/30/ev.owa.jpeg" alt="">
 
Source: UBS Infrastructure and Utilities Accumulation Index, S&amp;P ASX 200 Accumulation Index
Chart 1 shows that listed infrastructure generated a higher cumulative return than Australian shares over a 20 year period to 31 March 2015. Listed infrastructure generated a return of 16.4% p.a. while Australian shares generated a return of 10.4% p.a. 
Infrastructure assets provide stable and predictable cash flows with inflation linked revenue. Exposure to the infrastructure asset class can be achieved through listed securities, unlisted funds or superannuation funds that may invest in infrastructure. Listed and unlisted infrastructure is similar and has return profiles that differ over the short term and converge over the long term.  
Lev Driker is an Investment Analyst for Atchison Consultants. He can be contacted <a href="https://atchison.com.au/our-team/" target="_blank">here.</a>
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Infrastructure investment key to stable returns: Lev Driker

<html><body>
The Australian property markets find themselves in an unprecedented quandary with record low cash rates that have driven investment property prices in Sydney and Melbourne to record levels. The problem as I see it is that it is highly unlikely that such dizzy heights can be maintained, so that said one can assume that prices should start plateauing. 
The problem with that scenario is that given the present market conditions this is highly unlikely as property investors are only interested in Sydney and Melbourne real estate.
The owner occupier property market is much slower with stock levels at all-time lows which can be attributed to the fact that businesses are no longer paying cash bonuses preferring to reward staff with shares. What this has done is take billions of dollars from the owner occupier property markets which explains in principle why the owner occupier markets are so slow.
Nobody can really explain why property investors are only interested in Melbourne and Sydney especially when Australia is experiencing an unprecedented population explosion. This becomes even more confusing when we hear that Australia’s east coast is the destination expected to feel the full brunt of this population explosion.
This year I have been in dialogue with Richardson &amp; Wrench Projects where I have attended some information seminars to learn more about this fascinating investor market. The problem with real estate agents is that our knowledge is always contained within a particular postcode, hence a reluctance to look outside our comfort zone which is the very same mindset as property investors.
So the first question I wanted to know was where are the next best areas to invest outside Sydney and Melbourne, that are more much affordable with strong capital growth, excellent rental returns and with strong depreciation allowances. My question was answered immediately with two areas – Newcastle and Brisbane – well, that makes sense as they are both on the east coast with strong population forecasts.
With that in mind it was off to Brisbane to have a look around and see just why Brisbane is considered the next area to chase property investor returns. The first thing you notice is their road infrastructure is superior to Sydney’s with nowhere near the traffic congestion. Just like what we are now seeing with NSW where government is now on a record infrastructure spend, although in NSW we keep adding a new lane to infrastructure that was only constructed ten years ago. The government has allocated a further 120 billion dollars for infrastructure over the next three decades.
A new international airport and the big star attraction is the new Las Vegas style $4.000 billion casino – in many instances the South Bank area (which is the area I liked the most) reminded me of what’s happening at Barangaroo on Sydney Harbor. Although at a fraction of the price.
One of the most interesting points that really resonated with me was that the Richardson &amp; Wrench Projects team told me that they actually reject 90 per cent of projects that fail their strict criteria – which was evidenced in their project investment reports which are about sixty pages of research data. Investors in Sydney and Melbourne usually get a one or two page report if they are lucky which always have the usual disclaimers.
So what happens to the ninety per cent of developments that were rejected was my next question? Well, they lure those unsuspecting property investors and stitch them up which explains why property investors stick to the areas that sit well within their comfort zones – even though they know they are paying top dollar.
Australians love investing in property which explains why so much is written about bubbles, crashes and fear factor frenzies. So if you are contemplating stepping out of your comfort zone and looking for an investment area to watch closely we would recommend Brisbane – it’s a very interesting exercise especially for those who insist that you only invest in Sydney and Melbourne. I am the first to admit that this week’s visit to Brisbane has completely changed my property investment train of thought.
It’s important to note that Australia is changing (so must our perceptions) with the latest Bureau of Statistics projections now have Melbourne as Australia’s biggest growing city. Melbourne is tracking to become the country’s biggest city in 2056 and has also overtaken Western Australia to now be Australia’s fastest growing state.
MOSMAN – 2088
• Number of houses on the market this time last year – 74
• Number of houses on the market last week – 46
• Number of houses on the market this week – 43
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year – 57
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 43
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 39
CREMORNE – 2090
Number of houses on the market this time last year – 11
• Number of houses on the market last week – 6
• Number of houses on the market this week – 4
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year –11
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 8
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 12
NEUTRAL BAY – 2089
* Number of houses on the market this time last year – 3
• Number of houses on the market last week – 2
•Number of houses on the market this week – 2
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year– 42
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 30
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 39
ROBERT SIMEON is a director of <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/" target="_blank" title="RWM" rel="nofollow">Richardson Wrench Mosman and Neutral Bay</a> and has been selling residential real estate in Sydney since 1985.  He has also been writing real estate blog <a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/news/" target="_blank" title="Virtual Realty News" rel="nofollow">Virtual Realty News</a> since 2000.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Searching for the next investor hot spots? Robert Simeon

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
A key budget measure to change the age pension asset test has passed both houses of Parliament, despite concerns about the impact on pensioners raised by the Opposition, National Seniors and Industry Super.
But many such analyses have focused only on the income from investment assets rather than taking full account of retirees’ ability dip into their assets – like superannuation – to bolster their standard of living.
Superannuation - a nest egg or a gift to the next generation
In one example of a criticism that failed to show the whole picture, a National Seniors’ campaign poster<a href="https://nationalseniors.com.au/be-heard/retirement-income/2015-pension-cuts-campaign"> </a>against the cuts said that: a single woman living off $17,875 from $550,000 in savings will lose her part-pension. Yet, someone with no savings will receive a full pension of $22,365 plus concessions.
Little is made of the fact that the woman losing her pension can use the equity in her home to access a full pension via the Pension Loan Scheme, let alone that -– unlike the full pensioner -– she can spend some of her $550,000 in savings to supplement her standard of living.
Indeed, she is better off than most. Based on 2010 <a href="https://www.melbourneinstitute.com/hilda/" target="_blank">HILDA data</a>, only about a fifth of people aged 65-plus had non-home assets of over $500,000. Renters were even less likely to have such funds.
Similarly, analysis by Industry Super and Rice Warner projected the income levels of future retirees and compared these to what would be needed for a “comfortable’ retirement, as defined by Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia.
They found that, based on income from the age pension, superannuation, and wealth outside of superannuation, almost half of those retiring in 2055 are expected to have an income below the comfortable level and that the asset test changes will exacerbate the outcomes.
Their analysis also shows that as people accumulate more super, the asset test will affect a greater proportion of retirees and start impacting on middle-income Australians. This is unsurprising and exactly what one would expect from a maturing superannuation system. But again, little is said about how retirees have the option to use their financial assets to bolster their standard of living.
The implicit assumption seems to be that financial wealth will be passed on to children rather than be used to compensate for the loss of the pension and fund retirement (or health and care expenditures, since these are largely covered by the state). And this is in addition to passing on the family home.
The under-consumption puzzle
Recent <a href="https://www.cepar.edu.au/media/154967/age_pensioner_profiles_a_longitudinal_study_of_income__assets_and_decumulation.pdf" target="_blank">research</a> by the Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research confirms that most households receiving the age pension indeed choose not to spend down their financial assets and leave considerable bequests. It is part of a wider literature looking at what is referred to as the “under-consumption puzzle”.
The analysis is based on a sample of administrative data that tracked the assets and incomes of full and part age pensioners in the period between 1999 and 2007.
The results show that on average, younger and wealthier households tend to spend some of their financial wealth, but the majority see the financial assets grow, particularly couples and homeowners. Housing assets are usually preserved until very old ages unless a partner dies or goes into residential care, suggesting an element of downsizing.
Interestingly, the data shows that consumption is low when compared to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia benchmarks for a “modest” and “comfortable” retirement, even among the wealthier households in the sample.
One explanation is that pensioners may be self-insuring for investment and expenditure shocks, but the outcome of low spending profiles is that a large proportion of pensioner households leave significant assets as bequests.
Over 10% of single-person households in the sample exhausted 90% of the initial assets over the period, but the median pensioner that passed away during the study period was able to bequeath wealth (mainly financial) equivalent to 90% of the assets recorded at first observation.
Next up: a review of retirement income
The research highlights the extent to which pensioners rely on the age pension while preserving capital for their estate. In a system where the age pension is designed to be needs-based – not rights-based – and in the absence of inheritance tax, a strong asset test seems like an appropriate tax on such a practice.
The behavioural responses will be watched closely. A complete spend-down to gain pension eligibility is unlikely to be good value for money. Some might dip into their capital to compensate for the loss of their pension but the research suggests they will simply spend less. Others may invest in the family home, excluded from the asset test.
But one seldom quoted response is how the asset taper will affect risk. Those far from eligibility may seek out safer investments like annuities because the pension will no longer insure for losses in assets. Those who are on the steeper asset taper may seek riskier investments since the pension <a href="https://www.ceda.com.au/2015/05/Shrinking-the-Age-Pension-and-retirement-income">acts as a hedge</a> and compensates for losses (at $78 per $1k loss, compared to $39 previously).
Next on the agenda is a review of retirement income – a concession that the Greens extracted from the Government when agreeing to the asset test changes. Once the review does take place, let’s not forget to think about income as well as how people deplete their capital.
 
Rafal Chomik is Senior Research Fellow, ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research, UNSW at UNSW Australia and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://au.linkedin.com/pub/rafal-chomik/41/4b9/263" target="_blank">here</a>.
Susan Thorp is Professor of Finance at University of Sydney and can be contacted <a href="https://sydney.edu.au/business/staff/susanth" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Super, savings meant to fund retirement, not be bequeathed; academic

<html><body>
An Australian developer has outbid international interests to secure a Melbourne CBD fringe site for $2.65 million.
The property, located at 129-131 Market Street South Melbourne, is a 493 square metre site with multiple street access points. It was sold three weeks prior to auction and last sold two years ago for $1,725,000 - a 54% capital growth increase in two years.
Brokers Savills Australia, working in conjunction with M.G. O'Hallaran Property, said the lot was sold subject to a lease at $68,640 per annum.
Savills' Jessee Radisich said the purchaser will use the current zoning to build a premises to suit his business 
"But they were also well aware of the prospect of a potential future residential rezoning and while that is only a future consideration, it certainly was an aspect that drove the price up and allowed us to achieve that premium,’’ Mr Radisich said.
</body></html>

$2.65 million for CBD Melbourne fringe site

<html><body>
Last week we addressed some of the key issues facing younger homebuyers. This week, as promised, we’ve got some practical solutions.
Home buying and these suggested solutions are not for all young people (sub 45). But sitting on your backside, doing another tertiary course, or hoping a magical answer will come from your iPhone is also not the way for every young homebuyer either.
Yes, Australian society is presiding over a system that is unfair on you as young homebuyers.
Australian Society is taking away young people’s housing supply and increasing competitive demand through negative gearing, wealthy immigration and through paying no attention to regional infrastructure. Young people need to push forward a new batch of leaders with ‘we’ ideas instead of ‘me’ ideas and demand change. You need to get out on the streets and protest until you find leaders who can even up the ledger between older and younger Australians but the revolution may take 20 years and you as a young homebuyer can’t afford to wait forever to enter the property market.
Waiting for the market to ease never works.
No easing of the market will assist you to any noticeable degree. If you wait for any future government intervention to save you, your now 6-year-old child may be 26 before you can afford to buy. Your 16-year-old may be a 36-year-old.
You have to take action yourself. Wait for the market to change and you’ll pay the price. Please don’t confuse this statement with passing on buying the wrong home and then continuing to look for the right one in a patient, logical manner.
So our suggestion is don’t focus on the unfairness of negative gearing, super funds, Asian investing, well-off Baby Boomers and private family wealth. Focus on the fact that, this weekend, there are 300 people out there trying to buy the 30 good homes in inner to middle Melbourne on offer.
Yep 270 of those people are going to be unhappy – you need to be one of the winning 30 buyers this weekend or next weekend or later in the year.
So in Inner Melbourne right now; you as a young homebuyer are in a fight, like the wildebeest of Serengeti in a drought. There is limited grass and you need to avoid the predators (dodgy buying and selling agents, dodgy financial planners, dodgy brokers and dodgy advice which may come from well-intentioned people like your friends and relatives). Other predators are negative gearers, super funders and wealthy overseas migrants – not to mention your fellow young homebuyers.
Ok, all this negative and hard stuff is there, but don’t let it overwhelm you. Acknowledge it and move on. Many wildebeest see bad things, but the strong and the smart live on.
<a href="https://marketnews.com.au/2015/06/solutions-for-young-homebuyers/number-of-melbourne-homes-597x437/" rel="attachment wp-att-51096"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-51096" src="https://marketnews.com.au/wp-content/uploads/number-of-melbourne-homes-597x437-597x437.jpg" alt="number-of-melbourne-homes-597x437" width="597" height="437"></a>
Our Bidderman statistics (bidders per auction) show that on good homes there are consistently 6 to 10 bidders per well-priced suburb median Inner Melbourne home above a million dollars. It’s the same or even more below $1M.
Not every young homebuyer can be a winner – there are simply not enough good quality Inner Melbourne homes to satisfy demand. This is the mindset I think, or I hope Joe Hockey was trying to espouse. It’s up to you.
So get the right mindset – it’s up to you or you’ll be living in Whoop Whoop West. And when you try and sell in Whoop Whoop West in 10 years, to be closer to schools, the prices in Inner Melbourne could be even more unattainable.
Get the right plan and then go after the right position, right home and right price. 
Get a deposit and get multiple funding sources – banks, relatives, tenants, partner and so on.
I’m not a great saver, more a forced one and I care little about superannuation – which may or may not be a wise move now I’m hitting the twilight years!
I’ve think I’ve worked hard (bought over 1000 homes), had good jobs, lived in secure housing near the city, travelled, raised some great kids, had good family support and a good life (lot more to come I hope). I’ve lived off good income, at times overdrafts, parental help in the early days and growth allowed by negative gearing in the latter days. Our family has been lucky, but we’ve also made our own luck. The one money thought that stands out for me: good capital growth and a good job has given us a good good life and covered over a lot of my life mistakes and money sins.
Saving is good for many and recommended, but my point is there is more than one way to skin a cat (isn’t that an awful saying) and to fund a home. Such as:
*Parents (1) – They are your best chance for help with a deposit and loan guarantees. But you may have to sell them on the idea of helping you as they’ll want to protect themselves as they get older as well. Tell them if they don’t want to drive a hour to see the grandkids then you will need help buying closer (ok, not next door but maybe only 15 minutes away) – pull on the heart strings and then pull on their purse strings.
*Parents (2) – Start hassling them to buy investment homes. They can make their retirement better by buying and renting back to you. These investments build wealth and income and you help each other. It’s the Greek/Italian, Chinese and Jewish way and it works. If you are worried about family arguments, get a written legal agreement, such as a formal lease.
<ul>
<li>* for both of the above, you can’t expect (well you can, but why should they) your parents to do it all. You have to help yourself; to save, maybe get a second job and yes, you may have to move further out (just not too far and good 3P’s), to buy your first home and live in it for 5 to 10 years.</li>
</ul>
Get a good job. Joe Hockey is right–please, I don’t barrack for any political party–unless Pendles or Clokey are running for PM. If you want to be a Buddhist, vegetarian, charity-giving monk then hats off to you; but in all likelihood you won’t be living with three kids in a Hawthorn semi-detached period home. Please I know this sounds harsh–but there is validity to Joe Hockey’s comment – get a job that pays. Sales, Real Estate, Marketing, Small Business...or get a second job, or do this plus ask your parents for help and maybe negatively gear. Do what it takes, and do it sooner rather than later, if buying a good home is an important goal of yours.
 Get creative. Buy the home you can’t afford to live in now by buying and negatively gearing now. Put a tenant in and live at home with Mum and Dad. Or buy a home and live in somebody else’s home while they rent your property. Make sure agreements meet tax laws, but negative gearing on a good capital growth home is such a powerful tool. You need it to beat overseas bidding and if you can get some growth in the next ten years before you can afford to move in, you will have put hundreds of thousands of dollars into your back pocket. And it’s legal and mostly tax free (if you’re smart about it). Yes, of course there are risks, but sometimes to get into the housing market you need to take some risks, even if there is no real safety net.
Get a plan and a process that works.
Price, property and position. These are the three ‘Ps’ you need to keep in mind when planning to buy a property.
Median Price for Precinct, Home with Land, House with a liveable floor plan and all in a position that is near infrastructure.
The knowing is not rocket science – the rocket science, in 2015, comes in the getting.
Have clarity on what you want. Is a particular property really the home for you?
List the financial and emotional outcomes you want from your home under the price, property and position headings. At the end your PPP plan, as a starting point, shouldn’t be more complicated than three sentences. It’s simple but many people don’t work out what they want before buying – they don’t have a plan.
However, avoid plans from financial planners, bankers and seminars – if they involve high risk deals such as off the plans and new apartments – these do not work for young homebuyers.
Remember the FFFs too – five-year, flexible and future-proof. In 2000, a young buyer bought a Docklands apartment for $507,500. They sold it in 2014 for $576,000. At the same time another young buyer spent $493,000 on a family home in Glen Iris. They sold it in 2014 for $1.5 million. <a href="https://www.james.net.au/jba_mhbguide_20_web.pdf"> </a>
Once you have your plan, assess, value and negotiate – eg follow a proven process.
But, just as they don’t plan, many people don’t stick to a process either. And many people can’t negotiate.
Get a professional
My next piece of advice is the advice I would give you if you were having an operation, going to court or starting a business and that is to get a professional. The facts prove themselves. A good professional property advisor will help you.<a href="https://marketnews.com.au/documents/May_Results.xlsx.pdf"> </a>
People think you simply buy a house by sticking your hand up at auction. But only 25%-30% of the properties we bought in May were bought under the hammer. 70-75% weren’t. They were negotiations.
People baulk at paying a 1% fee for an advocate’s services, but while you wait and wait to buy a home, the market goes up. In the past few months some house prices have gone up 10-20% and many buyers are:
<ol>
<li>still not in a home </li>
<li>having to find 10% to 20% more</li>
</ol>
This is all because they felt they couldn’t afford good professional help – when indeed it would have paid for itself 10 or 20 times over in the last few months and perhaps 100 times over a 7 year period. Include it in your bank loan.
Buyer advocates are widely – and wisely – used in Europe and the US.  But most Australians think they can buy a home by themselves because that’s what Mum and Dad did. That was a different time and a different market. It might have worked in 1985 but, for many, it doesn’t work in 2015. You either don’t buy, or you end up buying a home nobody else wants at a price that nobody else was prepared to pay for it.
This week I met Hard Luck Harry and his wife, Hard Luck Harriet. They’ve bid 5 times on homes in the last two years and felt nothing was going right. I made one suggestion – when nothing is going right – go left. Try something different. Hire an experienced, reputable buyer advocate / buying agent.
Yes, we mainly buy properties in the $2m to $6m bracket, but most of the issues are similar for young homebuyers. Most of our clients have affordability issues. Almost everybody we work with has a limited budget, too.
Make good decisions and take action.
Good decisions. It’s all about the decisions you make. Isn’t all of life like that? If you decide not to make a plan, not to get some professional help, not to work hard and not to do your research they are your decisions – and they are bad decisions if you want to buy a good home.
This is what a James Report contains. You need to build your own excel databases to be able to do something like this.
<ol>
<li>Ask questions of your plan</li>
<li>Assess the property (due diligence)</li>
<li>Work through values, not just what the agent says</li>
<li>Get a negotiation strategy that works</li>
</ol>
<a href="https://marketnews.com.au/documents/James_Report_2015.pdf"> </a>
<a href="https://marketnews.com.au/documents/James_Report_2015.pdf" rel="attachment wp-att-51099"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-51099" src="https://marketnews.com.au/wp-content/uploads/JamesReportResults-379x448-379x448.jpg" alt="JamesReportResults-379x448" width="379" height="448"></a>
Finally, I’ll leave you with home-buying wisdom from the Melbourne Homebuyers Guide:
1. Happy spouse, happy house.
2. History repeats itself unless you break the cycle by breaking your habits.
3. Good decisions and bad decisions take the same amount of time and angst – only the quality of the prep is different. Get those 3P’s (price, property type and most importantly position) spot on.
4. Time heals or hides nothing in Melbourne property, it only accentuates.
5. No definition of value maintains its rigour for all people, except value to you; and
6. In negotiation, the closer you get and the more you talk about money, the further you drift from getting what you want.
 and my new No 7. Get the right mindset – its up to you.
Mal writes weekly auction reports, advice and in-depth market analysis on <a href="https://www.jamesbuyeradvocates.com.au/" target="_blank">James' website</a>.
</body></html>

maljames-vHwm28JUAa

High risk new apartments should be avoided by young homebuyers: Mal James

<html><body>
There are property experts who fancy regional investment over capital city.
But the latest CoreLogic RP Data pain and gain report suggests there can often be a pitfall in regional investment.
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Throughout the regional markets the proportion of loss-making resales for houses and units was much higher than in the capital cities. 
Across each regional area units recorded a greater proportion of loss-making resales than houses. 
Regional Qld (15.6% vs 29.3%), Regional WA (20.0% vs 32.4%) and Regional NT (12.3% vs 21.9%) had the largest gaps between the proportion of loss-making house and unit sales. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="page" title="Page 6">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Proportion of total resales at a loss/gain, houses vs. units, capital city vs regions: March 2015 quarter.
<a href="/images/2015/06/22/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-22%20at%202.16.59%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/22/Screen%20Shot%202015-06-22%20at%202.16.59%20PM.png" alt="">
</div>
</div>
{mijopolls 116}
 
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Where capital cities yield higher capital growth than regions as property investments

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
DEXUS Property Group (DEXUS) and DEXUS Wholesale Property Fund (DWPF) today announced that they will acquire Waterfront Place and Eagle Street Pier within the prime commercial precinct of the Brisbane CBD for $635 million.
It reflects $9,664 per square metre for the complex and a capitalisation rate of 6.9%. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
Stockland agreed to sell its 50% stake in the 40-storey Brisbane Waterfront Place office tower and Eagle Street Pier for $317.5 million to DEXUS.
Stockland will generate $296 million from the sale of the office tower, which is a 3% premium to its December 2014 book value of $287.1 million.
As part of the transaction, Stockland will also sell its 50% stake in the Eagle Street Pier retail and restaurant precinct for an additional $21.5 million.
Stockland and the Future Fund, through its manager Corval, entered into the agreement to sell the entire 100% interest in the tower and pier to DEXUS in what is a challenging leasing market.
The asset is currently 90% leased.
<div title="Page 2">
<div>
<div>
Waterfront Place overlooks the Brisbane River and features 59,500 square metres of premium office space with floor plates averaging 1,800 square metres. The building has a 5 star NABERS energy rating and a 4 star NABERS water rating. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
Stockland acquired the office tower in February 2004 and has invested $171 million, including the cost of additions, in its 50% stake.
The other 50% interest in the property was placed into a Stockland- managed retail fund and subsequently sold to the Future Fund in 2011 for $216 million.
CBRE advised it is the largest single office sale to have occurred in Queensland and one of the largest to have occurred in Australia - and certainly the largest since the GFC. 
“The acquisition by DEXUS is a significant vote of confidence in the Brisbane office market and the medium term outlook for Queensland,” said Bruce Baker, CBRE senior managing director, Queensland.
“Whilst foreign capital has featured heavily in the Australian market recently, the Waterfront Place transaction shows the big domestic players are still actively pursuing prime opportunities,” Flint Davidson, CBRE Director, institutional investments said.
 
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Brisbane Waterfront Place sold to Dexus

<html><body>
LF Economics duo Lindsay David and Philip Soos have published 23 recommendations into Australian banking reform in an attempt to curb what they believe is a 'perverse culture of homeowner entitlement' and a 'religious-like culture of property ownership and speculation'.
Featured in their submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics 2015 Inquiry into Home Ownership, <a href="/news/the-great-australian-household-debt-trap-lf-economics-lobs-first-submission-into-hor-housing-bubble-inquiry">The Great Australian Household Debt Trap: Why Housing Prices Have Increased</a>, the paper backs the use of macro-prudential tools to moderate house price inflation, suggests the implementation of a new RBA risk assessment framework and the RBA raises in the current interest rate.
The 23 recommendations are:
Recommendation #1
Prepare legislation for the implementation of a future Chicago Plan-style reform in the event of a severe banking crisis. This includes a progression to 100% reserve lending and backing for deposits, and public control of the money supply via issuance of government money (equity) when banks want to lend, unless they wish to pay an increased premium for private debt liabilities. Forcing the requirement that banks issue debt instruments to the government, rather than the private sector, is a blueprint forremoving the noxious impact of usurious fees and interest charges, and rapid inflation in themoney supply that causes asset bubbles and financial instability.
Recommendation #2
A range of macro-prudential tools should be implemented to moderate housing price inflation and subdue credit growth in a pro-cyclical financial system, particularly those affecting the loan to value (LVR), debt servicing (DSR) and debt servicing to income (DSTI) ratios.Quantitative restrictions are placed on the share of new mortgages with moderately high LVRs (60 to 79%), and significantly strengthened for mortgages with an LVR of 80 to 89%. Mortgages with an LVR of 90% and above, interest-only loans and those backed by parental guarantee are disallowed. Mortgage debt is capped at a multiple of ten times the imputed or actual annual rental income of the property being purchased to prevent a positive feedback loop forming between rising housing prices and debt.41 The ’30-10-30 Plan’ should be a future policy consideration following a severe downturn in the housing market.
Recommendation #3
To reduce systemic risk, a large rise in capital and liquidity ratios (buffers) is implemented so banks can withstand a future economic downturn, bank run, credit market freeze or large fall in the value of collateral. Research suggests the probability of a banking crisis can be reduced to a 1 in 100 year event by raising core equity (Tier 1) capital ratios to 11 per cent in isolation or raising core equity to 10% with an additional rise in liquid assets of 12.5% (the rise in liquid assets over total assets).For the Big Four banks, this represents a rise of around 3% in core equity. Liquidity and capital buffers (and general debt provisioning) must rise during the expansionary phase of the credit cycle, taming the size and duration of a debt-financed asset price boom.
Recommendation #4
APRA enforces a transparent and prudent risk-weighting methodology for determining capital ratios. APRA rescinds banks’ authority to calculate their own risk-weights with advanced internal methods (APS 113) and enforces all new bank lending under APS 112, applying more conservative criteria and risk weights for residential mortgages. Requisite modifications to APS 112 include higher risk-weights when asset prices significantly diverge from the long-term mean (25-30 year minimum), and re-calculation of potential super-sized LGD, PD and EAD during a large housing correction.
Recommendation #5
Significant capital allocations arising from conservative risk-weights imposed on financial derivatives, with prudential regulations requiring derivatives to be placed on-balance sheet in SPVs. 
Recommendation #6 
Development of a new RBA risk assessment framework including a range of macroeconomic, banking, market-priced and qualitative indicators:
<ul>
<li>Macroeconomic metrics include the stock and flow of credit to all sectors of the economy (household, non-banking financial, non-financial business, and government sectors), sectoral leverage, associated DSRs and estimations of credit quality. </li>
<li>Banking sector metrics include capital adequacy as a proportion of total asset value (not RWAs), liquidity ratios, non-performing loan rate, asset quality in high-risk sectors (e.g. residential housing), proportion of high-LVR and interest-only lending, asset concentration on bank balance sheets, and the level of specific provisions for bad debts. </li>
<li>Market-priced metrics include the divergence of asset prices from long-term averages (e.g. P/I and P/R ratios), credit spread between market/deposit and lending rates, proportion of securitised, offshore and short-term wholesale funding, degree of foreign investment, loan to deposit ratios, and the average maturity profile of debt. </li>
<li>Qualitative measures include lending standards and risk appetite, ratio of prime to non- prime/subprime lending, trends in loan control frauds, rapid bank network growth and the intensity of financial sector competition. 
</li>
</ul>
Recommendation #7
Strict limits are placed on the Big Four banks to prevent any further mergers or acquisitions due to the high concentration of Australian financial system assets under management and the already non-competitive operating environment. A maximum threshold is established for the proportion of credit aggregates directed towards any single asset class.
Recommendation #8
APRA enforces less reliance on wholesale borrowing, particularly short-term foreign debt, via existing regulatory powers. The average maturity of wholesale funding is lengthened by adopting suitable benchmarks for short and long-term wholesale borrowing, and imposing restrictions on off-shore bond issuance. A minimum level is also set for ‘stickier’ funding sources like domestic deposits.
Recommendation #9
Covered bonds are phased out, as this dual recourse funding arrangement poses significant over-collateralisation risks. The numerous funding advantages of the Big Four banks over second-tier lenders indicate they are not disadvantaged by this reform. Legislative amendments to the Banking Act 1959 subordinating depositors in the creditor hierarchy are unwound.
Recommendation #10
RMBS funding arrangements are reviewed and a maximum 10% limit set for total RMBS financing in any asset class. The AOFM explicitly rules out any future support for RMBS.
Recommendation #11 
Establishment of a Royal Commission to conduct an exhaustive investigation of the financial system and regulatory bodies. The Terms of Reference are broad and explore accusations of extensive subprime mortgage fraud, predatory lending, and regulatory agency culpability and negligence in addressing systemic risk and unconscionable financier conduct.
Recommendation #12 
External dispute resolution (EDR) organisation regulations are reformed to better assist victims of predatory lending. Arbitrary caps on mortgages are removed, allowing EDRs to write-off the entirety of loans in the worst cases of fraud. The powers of EDRs are significantly expanded to deal with recalcitrant lenders.
Recommendation #13
The Financial Claims Scheme (FCS) is broadened to include significant ex-ante funding from banks to provide depositor and general policy insurance. A financial contribution from banks discourages moral hazard and guarantees they bear a greater loss for subsequent failures.
Recommendation #14
Economists in senior and executive public roles are subject to a suitable incentive structure to ensure appropriate management of the economy and commentary. A range of key performance indicators can be adopted and benchmarked against the performance of the economy. Economists are held accountable for the quality of their work, with a number of penalties being introduced for poor performance: fines, loss of employment and even imprisonment in the worst cases of financial and economic collapse.
Recommendation #15
The development of a more transparent and empirically-validated stress-testing framework. Primary variables that predict future instability include the size of the credit-to-GDP gap (breaching 6%), DSRs greater than 20% (related to more severe recessions), a large proportion of credit aggregates directed towards real estate (42% of all Australian banking assets are housing loans), large deviations of asset prices from the long-term mean, and low equity to deposit ratios (a greater number of creditors have a claim on banking assets). APRA ceases to use ‘soft stress-testing assumptions’ for liquidity as noted in the 2012 IMF Financial Stability Report.
Recommendation #16
The APRA stress-testing framework includes the following secondary variables: large ToT shocks precipitating a significant fall in national income, persistent tepid or negative economic growth, steep rises in unemployment stressing high DSR households, and significant Australian bank exposure to the New Zealand market.A mining sector downturn would increase the likelihood of rising personal and commercial defaults, declining credit quality, and rising bank funding costs as credit ratings agencies lose confidence in credit quality. New Zealand’s housing bubble is also heavily dependent on capital inflows for funding, suggesting a simultaneous property downturn could amplifydifficulties for the Australian parent companies, despite legal ring-fencing.
Recommendation #17
The decision to implement a CLF is reviewed, alongside the conditions of access and possible taxpayer risk. At a minimum, the cost of accessing CLF liquidity should be substantially increased, as there is a spread of well over 100bps between the wholesale funding and cash rates. Banks may otherwise try to access the CLF for cheaper funding, instead of as a last resort measure. The RBA could also threaten to convert debt into equity following a large fall in the value of collateral pledged to access liquidity. Abolishing the CLF is the most prudent measure as it is a thinly-disguised, taxpayer-funded bailout mechanism. If financial institutions require capitalisation at taxpayer expense, they should be nationalised rather than bailed out.
Recommendation #18
Bail-in provisions overseen by the FSB and endorsed by APRA are repealed, despite Australia’s implementation of the new global liquidity framework (Basel III International Framework for Liquidity Risk Measurement, Standards and Monitoring). An independent panel of experts considers a range of alternative policy measures that contribute to financial stability, outside of the costly bailout/bail-in paradigm.
Recommendation #19
A ‘true cost of service provision’ regulation is implemented regarding the pricing of essential bank services. The banking and financial sector is regulated like utilities, rather than viewed as profit centres yielding infinitely rising returns for management and shareholders.
Recommendation #20
A levy is imposed on the financial sector for the government deposit guarantee, and calculated to be the approximate size of the derived market benefit. The Big Four’s heavy concentration and majority control over financial system assets means theyalready reap significant cost savings due to economies of scale.
Recommendation #21
The alleged benefits and costs of high frequency trading are reviewed. Algorithm-based trading has led to heightened volatility in many of the world’s markets and innumerable cases of market manipulation, such as front-running of orders by large institutional players with computerised infrastructure advantages.
Recommendation #22
Lender’s mortgage insurance (LMI) is disallowed. The shifting of risk to mortgage insurers is a form of private moral hazard providing banks with an incentive to lend without considering the capacity to repay. LMI does not afford lenders any real protection in a major crisis as these companies are often severely under-capitalised for the sizeable real estate risks they are insuring.
Recommendation #23
The RBA raises the interest rate. The current speculative housing price booms in Sydney and Melbourne are amplified by the cuts to the cash rate in recent times and thus should be reversed in an attempt to dampen speculation. This may provide an incentive to many highly-leveraged and negatively-geared investors to offload their properties and dissuade new entrants into the market. The knock-on effects of record low interest rates also negate the ability of retirees, dependant on their cash savings, to spend within the domestic economy. By sustaining housing price growth through lower interest rates, the RBA has reduced incomes which will inevitably push more retirees onto the pension as their bank accounts yield increasingly fewer returns.
 
</body></html>

Housing affordability must-do 23 banking recommendations: Lindsay David and Philip Soos 

<html><body>
Deniliquin had returned to the investor radar, local agent Ashley Hall at Big River Real Estate said.
"They come from far and wide," he said.
"Last week we have investors down from the Gold Coast, but more regularly from Sydney, Melbourne, Adeiaide and WA too," he said.
His Deniliquin agency has the most popular investor listing on realestateview.com.au at the moment.
"Yields are going up," he explained, adding the town's recent mention in a magazine list helped.
"But Deniliquin property is coming into its own," he said given the elevated employment for the rice mill, the abattoir and the police station under construction   
  
1) 428 Wood Street, DENILIQUIN, NSW, 2710
With six bedrooms spread across two brick properties on a 974 square metre block, this Deniliquin find comes with a motivated vendor and long term tenants.
The property is currently returning $200 per week for the four bedroom, two bathroom house and an additional $160 per week for the two bedroom fully renovated unit.
<a href="https://www.realestateview.com.au/Real-Estate/428-wood-street-deniliquin/Property-Details-buy-residential-8709714" target="_blank">Click here to see the property</a>
 
2) 45 Deans Road, AIRDS, NSW, 2560
<div>
A three bedroom offering complete with a renovated bathroom, second toilet, solar panels and gas cooking make up this listing which has attracted the second most clicks from investors on realestateview.com.
It has been marketed as a "bargain in Sydney's Western Suburbs." It is now sold to an investor. Initially it was advertised at offers over $380,000 with the vendor sensing the strong interest upped it to over $420,000.   
It noted that market rents for the area hover between $350 and $360 per week, making "this the ideal investment," Wayne Browne, the listing agent at Prudential Real Estate suggests. 
Wayne Browne told Property Observer that 70% of his buyer interest came from investors on the offering. The wide net cast through the website listing, allowed the buyer to come from 40kms away at Punchbowl.
</div>
<a href="https://www.realestateview.com.au/Real-Estate/45-deans-road-airds/Property-Details-buy-residential-8638014" target="_blank">Click here to see the property</a>
 
</body></html>

Investment

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Investment

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News