Longstanding Gold Coast and Canberra developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/morris-property-group">Morris Property Group</a> is continuing to roll on with its Glitter Strip apartment pipeline, seeking to return to Mermaid Beach with a new 68-apartment development.

Morris, founded by Barry Morris in 1978 and one of the Gold Coast’s most prolific apartment developers over the past two decades, has filed plans for a 12-storey mixed-use building at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/36-seabeach-avenue-mermaid-beach-qld-4218">34-36 Seabeach Avenue</a>, on the prized eastern side of the Gold Coast Highway.

The 1,227 sqm site occupies a prominent corner position at Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway, opposite the Mermaid Plaza retail and office precinct and around 140 metres walking distance from the future Mermaid Beach South light rail station.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/fraser-partners-0">Fraser &amp; Partners</a> has designed the project, which will comprise 68 apartments across a mix of 48 two-bedroom and 20 three-bedroom residences.

The building will rise 12 storeys, reaching a maximum height of 36 metres, with the apartments accounting for a total of 156 bedrooms. The development application also seeks approval for short-term accommodation across the 68 apartments, while two office tenancies are proposed at ground level.

The plans show 108 car spaces across the development, with parking accommodated at ground level and within a three-level basement accessed from Seabeach Avenue.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c2175c99-12fd-4a3c-9be1-89bbf258a90d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%202.59.41%E2%80%AFPM_0.png?VersionId=iNLzWcE6gaAE76rafhEXfHve.4g4Se0p" />

Resident amenity will be concentrated on level two, where Fraser &amp; Partners has designed a recreation deck with a swimming pool, 90 sqm pool terrace, outdoor barbecue area and gym.

The broader communal offering will also incorporate landscaped spaces, with the planning documents noting the amenity has been designed to provide areas for recreation, social interaction and outdoor living.

The proposal would continue the transformation of the Gold Coast Highway corridor through Mermaid Beach ahead of the arrival of the light rail.

The site is zoned Neighbourhood Centre and sits within the Mermaid Beach/Broadbeach Light Rail Corridor neighbourhood plan. While the prescribed building height is 24 metres, the site is identified within an Urban Neighbourhood context providing for a 50 per cent height uplift to 36 metres.

Planning documents describe the stretch of the Gold Coast Highway between Broadbeach and Nobby Beach as increasingly characterised by medium and high-rise development, with the proposed Morris tower joining projects including Ventura, The Alfred, Oceans and Otto.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="911f193f-e381-4a55-be08-58be87fcf978" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%202.59.48%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=oxVvLJaY.SOXEdXrIcogfyEXDfvCmmpM" />

The development would mark Morris Property Group's latest investment in Mermaid Beach, where it has already delivered two apartment projects.

Otto, at 1 Bondi Avenue on the western side of the Gold Coast Highway, comprises 70 apartments across nine storeys. The project was completed in 2019 and includes a residents' gym, recreation deck and swimming pool.

Morris also developed Oceans at 46 Ocean Street, a nine-storey, 70-apartment build-to-rent development completed in 2019. Oceans was the group's first build-to-rent project and incorporates commercial space at ground level.

The two existing Morris projects sit further north along the same Gold Coast Highway corridor as the proposed Seabeach Avenue development. Fraser &amp; Partners' planning analysis specifically identifies both Otto and Oceans among the established built-form precedents surrounding the site.

<img alt="Seabeach Avenue and the Gold Coast Highway" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="14925119-7b71-4812-8149-340317512c7c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-20%20at%203.00.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=aEJqYuw_nTCjcin17BSD0piB1EFotTlj" />

Mermaid Beach represents only part of Morris' considerable Gold Coast footprint.

The family-owned developer has been particularly active in neighbouring Broadbeach, delivering projects including Sierra Grand, Eclipse, Synergy, Qube, Koko, Opus and Malo, while its current pipeline includes Maison and the two-tower Crest development.

Further south, Morris has also developed a string of projects in Burleigh Heads, including Element, Boardwalk and Sandbar, while Essentia expanded its footprint north into Surfers Paradise.

The Seabeach Avenue application has been lodged by PMM Broadbeach Pty Ltd and seeks a development permit for a Material Change of Use for multiple dwellings, short-term accommodation and office uses. Zone Planning Group prepared the planning application, with Fraser &amp; Partners commissioned as architect.

The project comes as the developer continues to expand its Gold Coast pipeline while retaining a significant presence in Canberra. Morris now has more than $2.5 billion of development in its national pipeline and has delivered more than 7,000 homes during its near five-decade history

Joel Robinson

First look: Morris Property Group returns to Mermaid Beach with new Seabeach Avenue apartment development

<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw3hvFB2uWTRfEyEcpTSnnK9" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/fortis" target="_blank">Fortis</a>&nbsp;is continuing its stronghold on Sydn​ey’s eastern suburbs apartment market, launching&nbsp;in September&nbsp;its latest boutique&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/double-bay-nsw-2028&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw0GI5S9-wNeiLUnM-d1uYkw" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/double-bay-nsw-2028" target="_blank">Double Bay</a>&nbsp;development,&nbsp;<a data-saferedirecturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-william-double-bay-55-william-street-double-bay-nsw-2028&amp;source=gmail&amp;ust=1787272340808000&amp;usg=AOvVaw2YNouJQcFjiTTgVHbgDLA-" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-william-double-bay-55-william-street-double-bay-nsw-2028" target="_blank">55 William</a>.

55 William presents&nbsp;just eight north-facing&nbsp;two-bedroom, three-bedroom and full-floor&nbsp;residences to the market, priced from $4.5 million.

The upcoming launch comes just weeks after Fortis secured approval for the $80 million development, its third eastern suburbs approval in two months. Construction is already underway, with completion targeted for 2028.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376250]

55 William adds to a growing concentration of Fortis projects in and around Double Bay, a market the developer has become increasingly active in over recent years.

Fortis previously completed the nine-residence Marmont on New South Head Road, while it is currently developing a mixed-use residential and retail project at 12 Cross Street. Its wider Double Bay footprint also extends into commercial and retail development.

The developer's broader Sydney residential pipeline is particularly concentrated across the eastern suburbs, with projects spanning Doub​le Bay, Ro​se Bay, Wo​ollahra, Dar​ling Point, Poi​nt Piper and Eli​zabeth Bay.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376253]

At 55 William, Fortis has again turned to MHN Design Union, the architecture practice behind several of its eastern suburbs projects, while London-based 1508 London has been appointed to handle the interiors and Wyer &amp; Co the landscaping.

The six-level building will comprise a combination of two and three-bedroom apartments, including a garden residence, full-floor apartments, a sub-penthouse and penthouse. Each residence will have secure basement parking and private outdoor space.

A rooftop terrace for all residents, along with select apartments, enjoys views across Double Bay Harbour and toward the Sydney skyline.

Ceiling heights will reach up to three metres&nbsp;in select residences, while the kitchens will feature natural stone and integrated Gaggenau appliances.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

The boutique nature of the project reflects the type of stock Fortis has increasingly targeted across Sydney's eastern suburbs, where larger apartments and smaller buildings are being pitched primarily toward local owner-occupiers and downsizers.

Fortis Group General Manager Ed Eve said the developer continues to see demand from buyers wanting to remain in the eastern suburbs but move into newer, lower-maintenance housing.

“We're seeing continued demand from local owner-occupiers and downsizers looking for high-quality homes that allow them to remain in the eastern suburbs, close to the lifestyle and community they know,” Eve said.

55 William is also one of the early projects to respond directly to the NSW Government's Low and Mid-Rise Housing reforms. Fortis had previously secured approval for just two townhouses on the 599 sqm site before revising the scheme to eight apartments following the planning changes.

Situated one street back from Double Bay's water's edge, the project enjoys an enviable harbourside setting within walking distance of Double Bay Village and the ferry wharf.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152579 project_image_fid=376252]

Fortis has increasingly made the eastern suburbs a major focus of its Sydney pipeline. Beyond Double Bay, it recently completed the 14-residence Piper in Point Piper and has projects underway or planned across Rose Bay, Woollahra and Darling Point.

The developer recently secured approval for Verano in Rose Bay, a six-level development comprising 21 two, three and four-bedroom apartments, also designed by MHNDU.

55 William&nbsp;is soon to be release to the market with VIP appointments commencing early September,&nbsp;with residences priced from $4.5 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152579]

Fortis continues eastern suburbs push with 55 William launch

UAE-based developer Arada has unveiled plans for a $2 billion twin-tower apartment development in Broadbeach, marking its first move into Queensland as it continues its rapid expansion across Australia.

Arada will develop 952 apartments across two towers on a prominent site opposite the Gold Coast Convention and Exhibition Centre, with the project targeted for completion ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

The project represents Arada's largest commitment to the Australian market since arriving in the country in 2024 and significantly expands a local pipeline that has now grown to eight projects and more than 5,000 homes.

It will also be the first major Queensland project delivered by Roberts Co since the tier-one contractor was acquired by Arada Group in 2025.

Plus Studio has designed the Broadbeach development, which will comprise one, two and three-bedroom apartments across two towers connected by a landscaped podium.

A significant resident amenity offering will include lagoon and lap pools, a gym, sauna and steam room, alongside a mist room, infrared room and salt scrub facilities. Communal terraces, private dining areas, a library, residents' lounge and work-from-home spaces are also planned. Around 1,200 sqm of retail and hospitality space will occupy the ground floor.

The site puts Arada in one of the Gold Coast's most active apartment markets, directly opposite the convention centre and within walking distance of Pacific Fair, The Star Gold Coast and Broadbeach's dining and retail precinct.

It also has immediate access to the Gold Coast light rail network and sits just a few blocks from the beach.

Arada Group Chief Executive Ahmed Alkhoshaibi said Broadbeach represented an opportunity for the developer to expand beyond its initial NSW pipeline.

“Broadbeach is a world-class address that gives us the canvas to create a community of exceptional design and lifestyle quality that genuinely enriches the daily lives of the people who call it home,” Alkhoshaibi said.

“This is our first development outside New South Wales, and it reflects our growing ambition to grow in key urban markets around the country.”

Alkhoshaibi said bringing Roberts Co into the project would give Arada greater control over the development and construction process.

“Delivering this project through Roberts Co, our own tier-one construction business, means we can bring the quality, pace and accountability that our buyers expect.”

The move into Broadbeach comes as Arada accelerates its Australian expansion following its entry into the market two years ago. The developer has assembled a pipeline of eight projects comprising more than 5,000 homes, while the acquisition of Roberts Co last year gave the group its own Australian construction capability.

Globally, Arada has a development portfolio valued at $50 billion comprising more than 55,000 homes across the UAE, United Kingdom and Australia.

The Gold Coast is emerging as the next major market for the developer, with strong population growth and infrastructure spending ahead of the 2032 Games continuing to underpin significant apartment development across the coastal strip.

Arada plots $2 billion Broadbeach towers in major Queensland move

Sydney’s downsizer market is changing, with a growing cohort of buyers prioritising the right home over simply finding a smaller one.

Coronation Property Head of Sales Cam Porter says the traditional idea of downsizing does not necessarily reflect what many buyers are now looking for, particularly those moving from established family homes across Sydney.

Instead, he says they are increasingly becoming “right-sizers”, seeking lower-maintenance homes without sacrificing the space, amenity or quality they have become accustomed to.

“We are increasingly seeing buyers who are not motivated by the idea of simply moving into a smaller property,” Porter says.

“They are right-sizers. They want a home that is easier to manage and better connected, but they still expect generosity, quality and a floorplan that supports the way they live.”

It is a subtle but important distinction in a market where apartment developers are increasingly targeting established owner-occupiers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377495]

For many of these buyers, moving from a house to an apartment is not driven by a desire to dramatically reduce their living space. Instead, the appeal is in removing some of the maintenance associated with a larger home while retaining generous living areas, storage and enough flexibility to accommodate family and friends.

Coronation’s sales team is seeing buyers place particular importance on natural light, practical storage and additional rooms that can be used as guest bedrooms, home offices or secondary living spaces.

Kitchens and dining areas are also playing an increasingly important role, particularly for buyers who regularly entertain or have children and grandchildren visit.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377494]

“These buyers still want their home to feel generous,” Porter says.

“They may want less maintenance, but they are not looking for less life.”

The challenge for the broader housing market is providing enough of the right stock to encourage that move.

While much of the discussion around Sydney’s housing shortage has centred on the number of homes being delivered, Porter says the diversity of those homes is equally important.

Older homeowners can remain in large family houses for longer when they cannot find an appropriate alternative in the neighbourhoods where they have built their lives.

“The decision is rarely as simple as wanting fewer bedrooms,” Porter says.

“People are weighing up their connection to a neighbourhood, the space they need for family, the quality of the home and whether it will continue to work for them over the long term.”

It also has implications beyond the downsizer market. Providing suitable apartments for smaller households can free up established houses for families who need the additional bedrooms and land, creating greater movement through the housing market.

<h2>Lillian targets the next stage of apartment buyer</h2>

It is a buyer Coronation is targeting at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lillian-erskineville-9-metters-street-erskineville-nsw-2043">Lillian</a>, its new collection of apartments, terraces and penthouses at Erskineville Village.

Designed by Silvester Fuller, Lillian has been shaped around larger living spaces, natural light and flexible floorplans, alongside landscaped areas, wellness amenity and communal spaces for residents.

The development will form part of Coronation’s broader Erskineville Village precinct, which will combine new homes with green space, retail, hospitality and new pedestrian connections.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377688]

McPherson Park will sit at the centre of the precinct, creating a significant new green space alongside the project’s retail and hospitality offering.

For Porter, the opportunity is to give buyers another housing option without forcing them to leave the part of Sydney they already know.

“People should be able to change the type of home they live in without having to change their entire life,” he says.

“For many buyers, Lillian offers the opportunity to remain connected to the Inner West and the city, while gaining access to a more convenient, walkable and considered way of living.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135149 project_image_fid=377687]

Coronation will explore the changing <a href="https://lillianresidences.com.au/news/lillian-x-space-x-downsizers-event-27-august/">right-sizer market at an event on August 27</a>, bringing together experts across property, design and lifestyle.

Held in partnership with SPACE, Poliform and Downsizer.com.au, the event will include a property market outlook from economist Michael Blythe alongside discussion around the considerations facing buyers planning their next move.

Attendees will also be able to learn more about the residences and amenity planned at Lillian Erskineville.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135149]

From downsizing to right-sizing: What Sydney buyers want from their next home

Family-owned builder and developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/omaya">Omaya</a> is bringing its 27-storey The Maybelle development to market, with the 229-apartment tower rising alongside Ismay Reserve near North Strathfield.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-maybelle-21-parramatta-road-homebush-nsw-2140">The Maybelle</a> will comprise one, two and three-bedroom apartments, with its height providing elevated outlooks towards the Sydney skyline and Harbour Bridge, while other residences will look across neighbouring Ismay Reserve.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/squillace-architects">Squillace Architects</a>, the tower combines its parkside setting with proximity to the established retail, dining and transport amenity around North Strathfield.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376196]

Residences will feature open-plan living spaces and a choice of two interior schemes, while communal amenity is spread across two elevated levels of the building.

Level 8 will be home to the Garden Pavilion, a full-floor resident space incorporating communal entertaining and breakout areas, seating and recreation spaces. Further up the tower, a landscaped Sky Terrace on Level 14 will provide another communal area with panoramic views towards the Harbour Bridge and Sydney skyline.

At ground level, the development sits directly alongside Ismay Reserve, where lawns, walking paths, children's play areas, picnic spaces and recreational facilities extend the green space available immediately around the project.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376194]

The Maybelle is also within walking distance of North Strathfield and the Bakehouse Quarter, which provides a mix of cafés, restaurants, shops and everyday services.

Existing rail and bus services provide connections across Sydney, while the future North Strathfield Metro and access to the M4 will add to the transport options available around the precinct. Walking and cycling routes also extend via Powells Creek towards Sydney Olympic Park and its sporting, entertainment and parkland precincts.

Families are also well positioned for access to a broad selection of established schools and education options across Strathfield and the surrounding Inner West.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134873 project_image_fid=376181]

Omaya has operated in Sydney for more than 35 years, managing projects from acquisition and design through to construction and delivery. The family-owned company is both developer and builder of The Maybelle.

Apartments start from $560,000, with the development protected by 10-year Latent Defects Insurance.

Construction is well underway, with completion expected by the end of 2026 and move-in anticipated from Q1 2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134873]

The Maybelle brings 27-storey parkside tower to market near North Strathfield

First Home Buyers

<html><body>
There will always be property “professionals” willing to stand up and declare that the prime inner city suburbs are not only the best places to buy, but the only places to buy.
They will sit down only if someone asks them for some hard evidence to support their claims. Through decades of observing people with a vested interest or a bad case of real estate snobbery claiming so-called prime property has the best growth rates, I’ve never seen anyone back it up with research.
My own research contradicts the claims of the supremacy of “prime” property. The top end markets never produce the best long-term capital growth rates. In most of our capital cities, the lists of best suburbs for long-term growth are dominated by the affordable end of town.
For affordable, read downmarket. Across Australia right now, there are downmarket locations on strong growth paths. The number one market in the nation, according to Hotspotting research for The Price Predictor Index, is Logan City.
I wrote at length about this area last month. In discussing the general prospects for South East Queensland, I wrote: “There are myriad options but one that I particularly fancy is the unheralded (indeed often maligned) municipality of Logan City. The local council sees it as a strategic “city between two cities” because Logan bridges the gap between Brisbane City and Gold Coast City. It’s a municipality of 60 mostly affordable suburbs and collectively they are a nice fit for my core formula of affordability + infrastructure + jobs = price growth.”
Since then our research has found that Logan City has more suburbs with rising sales activity than any other municipality in Australia. Four Logan City suburbs make our national Top 30 list for suburbs with seriously forward momentum.
In Sydney, there are growth markets spread across the metropolitan area, some top end, some middle market and some bottom end. One that stands out as a market trending rapidly north is the Campbelltown LGA. Together with neighbouring Camden, it forms the single strongest precinct in metropolitan Sydney at the moment.
Other Sydney markets that continue to be strong include the local governments areas of Penrith, Blacktown and Liverpool.
Adelaide continues to fly under the radar of most investors, but the city is rising steadily – indeed, has been for the past 12-18 months, in terms of sales volumes. Towards the end of last year, we saw the first signs of that translating into price growth.
Within Adelaide, the number one area is the Salisbury municipality, which has more grown markets than any other precinct in the South Australian capital. The Salisbury LGA is about as downmarket as you can get, anywhere in capital city Australia.
The other standout markets with rising activity in Adelaide are all bottom-end precincts or middle market areas.
The generalised numbers for Perth depict a market that is stagnating or going into mild reverse. But beneath of the citywide statistics there are numerous sub-markets with growth trajectories. They are mostly bottom end affordable areas, like Wanneroo in the far north, Armadale in the south-east and Rockingham in the south-west. One or two are middle-market areas.
Last week I wrote that <a href="/news/vic/melbournes-middle-ring-leading-the-way-terry-ryder">middle Melbourne is leading the way</a> in residential property in the Victoria capital. But there are also several bottom end precincts with strong growth momentum. They include the municipalities of Epping in the north, Casey in the far south-east and Brimbank in the west.
That’s not to say there are no top end areas doing well in capital city Australia. In addition to the rise of affordable precincts a long way from the CBD, Sydney has a number of buoyant areas among the million-dollar-median suburbs. The numbers suggest that the millionaire suburbs surged in 2013, peaked in the December quarter of that year, subsided somewhat in the first half of 2014 but staged a marked sales revival late in 2014 and early in 2015.
Another standout is inner city Sydney. The Sydney City LGA includes a dozen highly-active suburbs, predominantly with sales of apartments.
But the good news for investors on a budget is that most of the growth markets in our cities are the cheaper ones.
TERRY RYDER is the founder of <a href="https://hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>. 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Good news for investors on a budget - the best growth markets are the cheaper ones: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
Even young first time investors are getting mum's money to secure their property purchases.
It was the case today when the one-bedroom house at 7 Little Bloomfield Street, Surry Hills, was bought by a first home buyer, with help from his mother.
Agent Marc Marano of Oxford Agency secured $840,000 for the single-storey worker's cottage at auction. 
It was marketed as a "diamond in the rough".
<img src="/images/2015/03/16/4.jpg" alt="">
Investor Doi Kim, 25, and his mother, Gina Lim will renovate before renting it out after paying $140,000 over the reserve, Fairfax Media reported.
The unrenovated, 63 square metre terrace had been in the same family about five decades.
The trend of traditional first time buyers investing instead as their first property purchase has been escalating in recent times.
Mortgage Choice has noticed a marked alternate trend of first time investor buying by the traditional first home buyer. 
"More and more are buying investments as their first time buy," Michael Russell, the Mortgage Choice chief executive said recently.
Their recent survey showed there were 21% of its first time buyers borrowing for an investment property rather than a home to live in.
Surry Hills' median house price sits at <a href="/news">around $1.26 million</a>, according to CoreLogic RP Data.
There was an $840,000 median back in 2010.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Even first time investors need mum's money in Surry Hills

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
2015 has kicked off with an abundance of off the plan apartment enquiry on <a href="https://urban.melbourne/apartment-register?utm_source=um_editorial&amp;utm_medium=link&amp;utm_campaign=AR_UM_register" target="_blank">Apartment Register</a>, across Melbourne’s inner city suburbs.
Apartment Register’s 400 enquiry sample has been 90% local owner-occupier, comprised of first home buyer (FHB) and first time off the plan buyers; the remaining 10% is local and overseas investors who typically own more than one property.
The common theme is the preference to purchase in the inner ring suburbs considered to be within 10 kilometres of Melbourne CBD: close to their place of work, friendships groups and public transport. For the most part, the buying experience is overwhelming, navigating through pricing, floor plans and marketing material with the average purchaser enquiring between five and 15 projects over a three to six month search timeline.
The trend for owner-occupier enquiry is the desire to live in what they phrase as a ‘boutique development’, considered to be that of less than 80 apartments with the ideal preferred number at 50 apartments. Owner-occupiers prefer lower annual body corporate fees, as they have existing recreation memberships and wish to settle within a six to 18 month settlement time line from date of enquiry, with an 18 month settlement period the maximum amount of time prepared to wait, prior to moving in.
Single first home buyer enquiry is 70% female (age bracket of 25-35) and 30% male (age bracket of 28-40) with a budget of $400-$450,000 for a one bedroom, one bathroom with car park (preferred over car stacking systems) at a minimum size of 45 square metres. 50% of the first home buyers currently reside at their parent’s residence and have assistance from the parents, with the remaining currently renting with a partner or friend and have saved the 10% deposit without family assistance.
First home buyer couples in the 28-34 age bracket have a product preference for two bedroom, one and a half bathrooms with car park configuration in the $500-$700,000 price bracket. Selection criteria includes natural light to bedrooms, ample ventilation and security system.
First time local investors selection criteria is for two bedroom, two bathroom and car park due to rental yield and flexibility to rent to a couple or friends. The proximity to transport and the number of the apartments within the developments mimics that if they were buying to live in.
The enquiry for over 55 year old downsizers is a healthy demand for two bedroom and study, two bathroom and car park at a minimum size of 80 square metres, with a budget of $700,000 to $900,000. The attraction is the cost of apartment entry, comparable to a townhouse product with lower entry cost and lack of stairs. Half of the enquiry of over 55 year olds still have a child living on premise, which does not deter their timing to sell the family home and downsize within the next 12-24 months.
At a suburb level, the trend in our enquiry data indicates buyers look for suburb corridors and are prepared to choose between three to four suburbs within that corridor area. For example, first preference for many is Fitzroy and Carlton, which depending on available products, clients are prepared to extend their criteria to North Melbourne or Collingwood.
On a suburb level, South Melbourne is the number one requested suburb - with Fishermans Bend gathering momentum with potential buyers - communicating that a complete suburb is not required for venturing beyond for schools, amenities and other services.
First time overseas investors prefer the Melbourne CBD as an investment, or for potential future use by the family when studying in Melbourne for tertiary education. Experienced overseas investors prefer the North Melbourne and Carlton precinct for proximity to Melbourne University and the Southbank precinct apartments for the Crown Entertainment Complex, along with access to the Botanical Gardens and Arts Precinct. Our enquiry indicates the even trend for one bed, one bathroom products up to $500,000 and two bed, two bathroom products up to $650,000.
Cameron T. Clarke is founder and principal of <a href="https://myrealestatemate.com.au/" target="_blank">myrealestatemate</a>.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://urban.melbourne/" target="_blank">Urban Melbourne</a>.
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

The first time investor property selection criteria: Cameron T. Clarke

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Home ownership is an important protection against poverty in retirement, and it has been suggested superannuation should be accessible to fund a deposit to help people enter the property market.
Proponents of such a scheme point to the Canadian and New Zealand models, which allow withdrawals to purchase property. These comparisons need to be made carefully.
The Canadian retirement income model does not require mandatory superannuation, and HSBC reports that currently about half of Canadians do not contribute to a Registered Retirement Savings Plan. In the case of New Zealand, the NZ Kiwisaver is a relatively new retirement savings plan, and the default rate of contributions is 3% compared to 9.5% in Australia.
There are two reasons why withdrawing superannuation for a home deposit can be counterproductive.
Firstly, the property market is unregulated and the current housing boom is a direct result of competition for a scarce resource. If first home buyers are allowed to withdraw from superannuation funds, the effect would be to increase competition, thus driving prices up further. This was the effect of the first home stamp duty subsidies that were available over the last decade.
Secondly, accessing superannuation balances would negate the effect of compounding returns over the years to retirement. The average balance of an Australian aged 30 to 34 years in 2011-12 was A$27,772. The Canadian model allows a person and their partner to each withdraw C$25,000 from their superannuation, repaying it over 15 years. If adopted here, this would effectively wipe out the superannuation balance of each of them and would still be less than 10% of the median house price in the major Australian cities. Repayments would need to be in addition to mandatory contributions, and after mandatory contributions, HECS repayments and mortgage repayment, this could result in financial distress for borrowers.
Capital growth could give some protection from lower superannuation balances, but in the context of the family home, the gain would not be realised until the owner(s) downsized, as the usual pattern of home ownership is to sell and repurchase in the same market.
Despite widespread discussion about the proposal, government representatives have said they have “no plans” to change the rules on accessing super.
Lack of reform
The superannuation system is linked to both taxation and the pension system, but since 2007 it has been effectively quarantined from reform.
Contributions and investment earnings in a complying, taxed, superannuation fund are taxed at 15%. Withdrawals are also taxed at reduced rates, and since 2007 have been tax exempt for persons over the age of 60.
Conceptually superannuation is a form of long-term savings that displaces other forms of savings and, according to the ABS is the major financial investment held by most Australians. Our superannuation system is mandatory for employees, so employees earning more than A$450 per month have no choice as to whether they will save through superannuation.
The legal requirement is placed on the employer, but the economic reality is that superannuation is imposed on employees: it is reflected in the take-home pay of employees, notwithstanding the 1987 trade-off between award wages and superannuation.
In the case of a high income earner, the 15% tax rate on superannuation encourages savings into superannuation. However, low income earners who pay income tax rates less than 15% find that most of their savings are locked up in superannuation without any tax concessions. This affects their ability to save for a deposit on a house, or to have funds available in an emergency.
Superannuation and tax incentives
The Henry Review considered the problem of investment bias, although the government excluded tax exempt payments to persons over 60 from the terms of reference. It identified a clear incentive for a high income earner to put money into superannuation, displacing other investment, and a disincentive for low income earners.
Contribution caps limit the amount that can be contributed in superannuation that can subsequently be withdrawn tax free. However they are much higher than the SGC rate giving room for a high income earner to divert savings into superannuation: at the current mandated SGC level of 9.5%, a person would have to earn over A$300,000 pa to breach the non-concessional cap. A member can also contribute up to A$180,000 pa of non-concessional (tax paid) contributions. The tax benefit is that income earned by the superannuation fund on that investment is also taxed at 15% instead of the member’s marginal tax rate. In a self managed superannuation fund the member can then direct the investment strategy personally while taking advantage of the tax shelter.
Since 2013 contributions by very high income earners have been taxed at 30%, but the threshold of A$300,000 (including superannuation) ensures this only applies to a minority of taxpayers.
Balancing super and the pension
The balance between superannuation and the Age Pension is critical to funding retirement income. The mandatory superannuation system was proposed as a means of supplementing, not replacing the pension, and the 2015 Intergenerational Report predicts that by 2055 spending on the Age Pension will be at similar levels to now, but higher numbers of pensioners will be receiving a part pension. In 2011-2012 the average superannuation balance at retirement was A$197,000 for males and A$105,000 for women. Although it is increasing most retirees will at some stage need some support from the Age Pension.
Retirees can game the system by taking substantial tax exempt lump sums remaining eligible for higher rates of pension. When a superannuation fund goes into pension phase, the member is required to withdraw a minimum amount, based on the age of the retiree, but there is no cap. The Murray Report echoed the Henry Review when it again recommended the development of more comprehensive income based retirement products.
While superannuation balances generally are low, lump sum withdrawals can be ascribed to paying down debt and transition to retirement costs, and there is a growing concern that people approaching retirement take on additional debt in the expectation that they will be able to pay it off when they receive their superannuation.
The tax exempt status of superannuation pensions is a more pressing concern. When the member retires and a superannuation fund goes into pension phase both the income of the fund and the amount paid to the recipient are exempt from income tax. In the 2014 year this cost the budget bottom line A$16.3b in foregone revenue and was the 3rd highest tax expenditure. It is difficult to see how this tax expenditure can be maintained indefinitely.
Where to from here?
The fiscal risk inherent in the superannuation system is clear, as highlighted in the Intergenerational Report and the Murray Report.
The options for reform include equalising tax rates across the accumulation and pension phase of superannuation; imposing tax on superannuation accounts with a high balance; taxing contributions by applying a rebate to the member’s marginal rate of tax; lifetime caps on non-concessional contributions to superannuation funds;and making a regular income stream more attractive than lump sums.
The political issue is that governments are not willing to propose reforms that will impact on the current generation of retirees, and continue to quarantine the retirement system from serious review. Until we can openly talk about the lack of sustainability in the retirement income system, we will continue to impose a fiscal burden on future generations.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/38165/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Helen Hodgson is associate professor at Curtin Law School, Curtin Business School at Curtin University.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

hhodgson-WTYf8w7F7q

We need to talk about super, not just first home buyers: Helen Hodgson

<html><body>
Allowing young buyers to withdraw their superannuation savings to buy their first home would trigger a $31 billion federal budget hole by mid-century, according to indicative modelling by PwC.
Changing super rules to fund housing would cost the government between $500 million and $1.1 billion a year in lost revenue.
Treasurer Joe Hockey has triggered debate since last weekend's reported comments about making super more "flexible" in the wake of the intergenerational report.
The analysis by PwC was provided to The Australian Financial Review based loosely on a similar scheme in Canada, which allows a withdrawal of $25,000 for a first home.
PwC partner Paul Abbey said he assumed that an Australian scheme would be limited to people below 35 years, with around half of those eligible choosing to withdraw $25,000 for a 10-year period.
The loss to government – which taxes earnings on super balances at 15% – would be $1.1 billion in 2016-17, and fluctuate between $611 million and $993 million over the next nine years.
By 2049-50, the figure would hit $2.1 billion, taking the accumulated hit to government to $31 billion, according to the PwC estimate.
</body></html>

FHB super access would blow hole in federal budget

<html><body>
"Sydney needs to slow down," Charles Tarbey, chairman and founder of Century 21 Australasia, said this week in a quarterly market commentary.
Mostly due to supply issues in certain suburbs of Sydney, Charles Tarbey says there has been over-zealous bidding.
"The agents themselves are absolutely shocked at the prices that are coming through," he said.
He said that valuers were "starting to get a bit gun-shy right now".
"I would say that between the valuers and the banks, and the increased prices that sellers now want based on what they are seeing, I think these things will all slow the market down," Tarbey continued.
"I expected that to happen last year, but it didn't, it just kept rolling on.
"I'm trying to talk the heat of the market, but most agents are unfortunately talking it up, and it's very dangerous."
He said stock was starting to climb.
"It’s just not climbing in certain pockets - that's the problem - and these are the pockets that are being reported on, the ones where the TV cameras are watching all of the Asian buyers apparently purchasing property.
"Tie all that together, and you get the absolutely wrong story.
"If you're wanting to buy your first property in Sydney right now, you'd be too scared to go out and look right now, you'd be thinking ‘what's the point’?
"I know this sounds strange coming from a real estate practitioner, but I really hope that they introduce more macro prudential tools - particularly around investment, and certainly around gearing."
</body></html>

"Sydney needs to slow down", FHB's are too scared to look: Charles Tarbey

<html><body>
Paul Keating, the architect of Australia's universal superannuation scheme, has said it was a bad idea to allow first home buyers to dip into their super savings.
"Any meaningful housing deposit taken from the accumulated savings of younger savers would effectively eliminate or near eliminate the base from which the important compounding [of earnings] would otherwise occur," Keating wrote in a column for Fairfax Media.
The former prime minister Paul Keating also warned that if Australians could dip into their super savings at an early age, it would increase pressure on the federal government's aged care budget.
"The key to wealth accumulation in retirement savings is compound earnings," Keating noted days after the Treasurer Joe Hockey raised the prospect of allowing people to dip into their super.
Joe Hockey called for public debate on making super more "flexible" during people's lives.
In an opinion piece, Paul Keating accuses the Liberal Party of attacking Australia's super system for ideological reasons.
"The Liberals have always hated national superannuation for the broad workforce," Keating writes.
"Superannuation for them is fundamentally an ideological matter.
"Just like Medicare, the Liberals object to the universality of Medicare and they keep having a go at it, like the recent attempt to require a co-payment to doctors.
"They have now dropped off that because the going got too rough for them.
"So that having failed, they are back at it again at super – the other great universal scheme.
"But instead of saying they oppose it ideologically, and arguing their case intellectually, the Treasurer will try to reach the same outcome by masking his real intentions as a professed concern for homebuyers." 
"This idea is certainly not an innovation and is not responsible enough even to be considered a thought bubble."
He wrote that proposals floated by the Treasurer would breach the principle of "preservation" of superannuation accumulations and would destroy universal retirement savings at its core.
"Breaking what is now a national consensus on the principle of preservation, where savings cannot be drawn down till age 55, would amount to the wilful destruction of one of the best retirement systems in the world."
</body></html>

Paul Keating says Joe Hockey's FHB super idea will compound ageing problems

<html><body>
The NSW Opposition has promised a staggered stamp duty payments scheme for first home buyers if it wins government at the upcoming March election.
It was an undertaking revealed on the Channel 7/Daily Telgraph leaders debate in response to an audience question about what Luke Foley and Mike Baird would do to make it easier for first home buyers to enter the hot NSW market.
“Look at a scheme where people, rather than being charged 100 per cent of stamp duty upfront, they could pay it back in instalments over several years,” the NSW Opposition leader, Luke Foley suggested, seemingly foreshadowing a more detailed policy announcement.
Advising the key to lowering prices was increasing the number of houses built, Premier Mike Baird said he had introduced a scheme where first home buyers purchasing new dwellings under $550,000 are exempt from paying stamp duty.
Stamp duty is one of the big upfront costs in buying a house especially if the buyers don't wish to be corralled into buying a new house or flat.
<a href="https://www.apps08.osr.nsw.gov.au/erevenue/calculators/fhnh.php" target="_blank">Stamp duty is calculated</a> by applying a sliding scale of state government taxation, depending on the value of the property purchase.
The NSW first-time buyer concession in place for stamp duty is designed to make it easier for people to get their first home, but only news homes. 
NSW is probably the most generous state.
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
The scheme was established to assist eligible first home owners to purchase a new home or build their home by offering a $15 000 grant. The grant applies to new homes only and does not apply to the purchase of an established home, vacant land, business premises or a holiday house. The grant will reduce to $10,000 on 1 January 2016. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
The First Home New Home scheme commenced from 1 January 2012 and provides eligible purchasers with exemptions from transfer duty on new homes valued up to $550,000 and concessions for new homes valued between $550,000 and $650,000.
Eligible purchaser buying a vacant block of residential land to build their home will pay no duty on vacant land valued up to $350,000, and will receive concessions for vacant land valued between $350,000 and $450, 000.
 
 
</body></html>

NSW Labor promises staggered stamp duty for first home buyers

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
For most people, buying their first home is daunting. But if Australians want to ensure home ownership isn’t out of reach for low- and middle-income earners and get better value out of taxpayer-funded housing support, it’s time to do more than simply hand out <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/billions-in-handouts-but-nothing-gained-20110315-1bvvs">costly first home owner grants</a>.
Evidence from overseas and interstate shows that a good place to start would be with making more options available to those on reasonable income but stuck renting.
Yet New South Wales – Australia’s most populous state, with <a href="https://www.mywealth.commbank.com.au/property/how-does-sydney-property-stack-up-globally--hottopic201410">the most expensive capital city</a> - has done less than many other states and territories to develop cost-effective options for aspiring home owners.
As NSW heads to an election at the end of this month, its next state government has a chance to catch up and make it easier to get a foothold in its notoriously costly housing market.
Rethinking how we own our homes
Australians tend to think of three different ways of being in the housing market: private ownership of a home, renting from a private landlord, or renting public housing from the government.
But there are other models of stable housing, variously called “intermediate housing tenure”, “shared equity”, and “shared equity home ownership”. Basically, the resident owns their home through partnership with either the government or one of Australia’s hundreds of registered community housing providers.
Depending on the arrangement, the resident can either gradually buy out the housing partner (the government or community housing provider), or else they can cash in their portion to move into market-rate ownership.
There are well-established examples in <a href="https://www.cchpr.landecon.cam.ac.uk/Projects/Start-Year/2011/Understanding-second-hand-market-shared-ownership-properties">the United Kingdom</a> and <a href="https://www.nhi.org/pdf/SharedEquityHome.pdf">the United States</a>, as well as in Australia.
Interstate examples of shared ownership schemes
Western Australia’s government-run scheme was applauded in <a href="https://www.ahuri.edu.au/publications/projects/syn91">a recent report</a> and won its department a 2014 Premier’s Awards for Excellence in Public Sector Management. Under that scheme, the householder buys with up to 30% of the value held by the government, and borrows the remaining 70% through the government-run KeyStart loan scheme. The buyer needs only a 2% or $2,000 deposit and there are no account keeping fees.
Like the WA scheme, the Northern Territory’s HomeNorth scheme enabled residents to buy with the government holding up to 30 per cent of the value. South Australia’s <a href="https://www.sa.gov.au/topics/housing-property-and-land/buying-and-selling/affordable-houses-to-buy/shared-value-affordable-home">Shared Value Affordable Homes</a> program allows low- to moderate-income buyers to buy their home with the government providing a 20% discount. When they sell, the equity gain is shared with the government according to an agreed formula.
The Australian Capital Territory’s <a href="https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/home-buyer-assistance/land-rent-scheme">Land Rent scheme</a> allows low- to moderate-income buyers to pay rent for their land based on its unimproved value, and take out a mortgage for the home’s construction cost.
Yet apart from the ACT, there is a notable absence of schemes on Australia’s heavily populated east coast.
There are some models <a href="https://www.communityhousing.org.au/S8_Shared_Home_Ownership">under investigation</a>, and community groups such as <a href="https://www.sydneyalliance.org.au/shared_equity_faqs">the Sydney Alliance</a> that are advocating for shared equity. But much more could be done with government support.
In NSW alone, there are already nearly 400 <a href="https://www.housing.nsw.gov.au/Community+Housing+Division/Community+Housing+Providers/">not-for-profit community housing providers</a> providing affordable rental homes. Many of these are interested in offering ownership options to their tenants, as well as to people stuck in private rentals who could afford a moderate loan. However, under current First Home Owners Grant legislation, such buyers would be ineligible for funding.
Costly grants versus stable solutions
When we talk about first home buyer assistance, we assume that government grants are the best option. Yet that’s not what the evidence shows.
As prominent <a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/property/firsthome-grants-keep-young-off-property-ladder/story-fniz9vg9-1226806291907">economist Saul Eslake</a> highlighted last year, government grant schemes for first home home buyers have cost taxpayers more than A$22.5 billion since 1964, with poor results: "It’s hard to think of any government policy that has been pursued for so long, in the face of such incontrovertible evidence that it doesn’t work, than the policy of giving cash to first home buyers… Cash grants and other forms of assistance to first time home buyers have served simply to exacerbate the already substantial imbalance between the underlying demand for housing and the supply of it."
Many <a href="https://www.businessspectator.com.au/article/2013/1/21/national-affairs/built-backs-first-home-buyers">other economists</a> and <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/business/property/calls-for-first-home-owner-grant-to-be-scrapped-20110909-1k1yl">property analysts</a> share Eslake’s view.
If we’re looking for more bang for our housing buck, shared equity homeownership schemes could be a better solution.
<a href="https://www.burlingtonassociates.com/files/3513/4463/1435/1-Lands_in_Trust_Homes_That_Last.pdf">One study</a> in the US found that one scheme used just one-fifth of the tax dollars that would have been spent if the buyers had been given a one-off grant (similar to Australia’s <a href="https://www.firsthome.gov.au/">First Home Owner Grant</a>).
Studies to date show that <a href="https://www.nhi.org/pdf/SharedEquityHome.pdf">US shared ownership schemes</a> can also have a social upside, with much <a href="https://www.lincolninst.edu/pubs/1936_Stable-Home-Ownership-in-a-Turbulent-Economy">lower foreclosure rates</a> than in the broader market in what has been a turbulent time for many US home owners since the global financial crisis.
How to help more people buy their first home
If the next NSW government really wants to help more people in the state own a home for the first time, there are two options they could consider.
Assuming scrapping the First Home Owner Grant is too politically difficult, the government could instead amend the legislation to make the grants available for people buying into shared ownership schemes with community housing providers.
If the government wanted to be more ambitious, it could make some of the grant budget available as competitive funding for not-for-profit community housing providers to develop shared ownership housing.
When designed well, shared ownership can provide viable, stable housing options for low- to moderate-income earners – many of whom might never get to become first home buyers without a helping hand at the start.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/38155/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Louise Crabtree is senior research fellow at University of Western Sydney.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

NSW is dragging its feet on help for aspiring first home owners

<html><body>
Capital city first home buyers are boosting approvals for townhouses, units and semi-detached homes, according to Bankwest.
Bankwest's Housing Density Report showed that while medium density housing approvals as a proportion of total dwelling approvals was down slightly in the past year – 43% in 2014, compared to 44% in 2013 – approvals for the homes are trending upwards and approaching record levels. In the 12 months to November 2014, 85,323 medium density homes were approved.
In New South Wales, the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory, townhouse, unit and semi-detached homes made up the majority of approvals in the year to November 2014. In Western Australia, less than 25% of housing approvals were for medium density homes.
<img src="/images/2015/02/26/Picture%2014.png" alt="">
The category's approvals overtook house approvals in 30.4% of all Australian local government areas in that time.
Unsurprisingly, the growth in medium density housing was concentrated in capital cities. Bankwest executive general manager of Retail, Andrew Whitechurch, said last year almost nine out of 10 approvals for medium density dwellings were in capital cities.
"This is a marked increase from 2011, when the Census revealed capital cities accounted for only 76% of all medium density dwellings," said Whitechurch.
According to Bankwest's report, 88.2% of medium density approvals were for capital city homes. The concentration around capital cities was most pronounced in South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.
"The number of medium density housing approvals has increased in five out of the eight capital cities in the 12 months to November last year," Whitechurch said.
"Perth experienced the largest increase, with approvals growing by 43.7%.
"Brisbane and Melbourne also saw double digit increases (23.1% and 18.9% respectively), followed by Adelaide (8.9%). Approval figures in Sydney have remained stable with a 0.4% increase."
<img src="/images/2015/02/26/Picture%2013.png" alt="">
Considering medium density housing as a proportion of total approvals, Brisbane is seeing the quickest escalation in housing density of any capital city. There, the proportion of medium density housing approvals increased by 33.7 percentage points between 2011 and 2014. Bankwest attributes Greater Brisbane's share of medium density approvals in part to apartments, townhouses and units in the Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast.
Canberra saw the second highest increase in medium density housing as a proportion of total approvals, with a 27.7 percentage point increase in the three year period. The increase has been in part due to the ACT's Tuggeranong, where housing density is increasing faster than in any other local area (as defined by the Australian Bureau of Statistics). Between 2011 and 2014, the proportion of medium density approvals has jumped 64.2 percentage points, to 79%.
While almost all the capital cities saw an increase in the proportion of medium density approvals, Hobart bucked the trend, with the proportion of medium density housing decreasing by 8.6 percentage points in the same period.
Whitechurch said first home buyers are likely to be driving the demand for medium density housing as they seek out more affordable housing options.
"Bankwest's First Time Buyer Deposit Report, released in December last year, showed that  units are considerably more affordable, taking the average first time buyer couple 3.3 years to save a 20% deposit on a median-priced unit in an Australian capital city compared to 4.1 years to save for a stand-alone home," he said.
He also cited population growth as a key driver for medium density housing supply.
"Increasing competition for housing and higher prices will no doubt lead to further growth in medium density housing approvals in the future," said Whitechurch.
"Despite this ever-emerging trend, the growth in approvals for stand-alone houses outpaced medium density home approvals in the year to November 2014 (14.9% growth compared to 10.2% growth)."
</body></html>

First Home Buyers

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

First Home Buyers

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News