Around 400 additional homes could be built at Southwark Grounds on Port Road, lifting total site capacity from 1300 to around 1700 dwellings.

A recently approved code amendment would allow apartment towers of up to 14 storeys in some areas of Renewal SA’s redevelopment of the former West End Brewery.

Renewal SA Acting Chief Executive Shane Wingard said he welcomed the code amendment, with the increase in heights and homes making a positive impact on the supply of high-quality, well-connected housing close to the city.

“By going higher across some parts of Southwark Grounds, we are adding a substantial number of very well-located homes with little impact on project delivery time or planned open space,” Mr Wingard said.

Since the project officially launched in 2025, Mr Wingard said more than 12,000 enquiries had been received about living at Southwark Grounds.

“The very strong early interest we’ve seen since homes were first released in the precinct reinforces our plans to create more housing opportunities,” he said.

The Southwark Grounds code amendment was launched in December last year, with community engagement undertaken over five weeks from January.

It proposed increasing maximum building heights from eight to 14 storeys on the eastern section of Southwark Grounds, and to 12 storeys across the remainder of the site, with minimum building heights ranging from two to four storeys.

The code amendment was implemented through an Early Commencement policy in late January, allowing developers to quickly explore the viability of increased height and housing yield while other planning processes continue.

One of the first developers delivering apartment sites have already finalised redesigns to increase the number of apartments following the code amendment.

Samaras’ development adjacent to the future Colonel Light Park is now planning to deliver 125 apartments across 11 storeys, significantly greater than original plans of around 50 apartments across four storeys.

The developer is also exploring the potential for additional affordable housing outcomes.

Most of the apartments at Southwark Grounds will be delivered within a master-planned precinct on a large parcel of land on the eastern portion of the site, covering around two-thirds of its 8.4 hectares.

Wingard said detailed precinct planning over the coming months may identify further opportunities to increase yield further that could see total apartment numbers at Southwark Grounds, exceed this number.

Affordable homes at Southwark Grounds will also see a net increase, with Renewal SA maintaining its commitment to a minimum of 20 per cent affordable housing across the development.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Civil works have begun across the site, with construction under way on the first new roads surrounding a townhouse precinct in the south‑west corner of Southwark Grounds. This includes Renewal SA’s 17 Founder’s Row homes, which are on track for completion by Christmas.

“We expect to have people living at Southwark Grounds by the end of the year, so delivering roads and public spaces for those residents is among our highest priorities.”

Construction of 40 townhouses off Anderson Street, known as West Village and being delivered by Contour, is forecast to begin in mid‑2026. Kolabb’s Anderson Lane development will follow shortly after, delivering a further 26 townhouses.

Southwark Grounds is a state government‑led urban renewal project now set to deliver around 1,700 homes over the next decade.

Homes will be supported by a supermarket, a range of retail and hospitality offerings anchored by a revitalised Walkerville Brew Tower, a childcare centre, car parking and well‑connected public spaces.

Joel Robinson

400 new homes planned for Adelaide's former West End Brewery site

Brisbane developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/cavcorp">Cavcorp</a> has lodged plans for a new mixed-use residential development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/55-wyandra-street-teneriffe-qld-4005">55 Wyandra Street</a>, Teneriffe, anchored by an 85-metre public laneway designed to reconnect the suburb’s riverfront with the Gasworks precinct.

The buildings, known as Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane, would replace the existing Queensland Cotton head office site with a 15-storey residential tower transitioning to eight storeys toward Helen Street. The project has been designed by Plazibat Architects and lodged as a code assessable development application for 93 apartments across a 3,401 sqm mixed-use site within the Newstead and Teneriffe Waterfront neighbourhood plan.

Central to the scheme is the transformation of an existing service easement into a publicly accessible cross-block connection linking Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the new laneway will act as both a pedestrian shortcut and a landscaped civic space between the Teneriffe Riverwalk, ferry terminal, and Gasworks precinct.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="26e7f058-b065-4de8-b13d-a2b8cb64dfcc" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/bldg.png?VersionId=sELS0ZKYi361oYipUa1BIKfe_.DLZoFV" />

“The revised proposal delivers a legacy public-realm cross-block link, permanently secured for community use, transforming an existing private easement into a safe, high-quality pedestrian connection between the Teneriffe heritage riverwalk and the Gasworks–Long Island precinct,” the planning report states.

The laneway will sit beneath a large subtropical loggia integrated into the podium levels of the development. The design incorporates deep landscaping, water gardens, lobby spaces, business lounges, and ground-floor apartments to create what Cavcorp describes as a climate-responsive “urban verandah.”

The tower itself has been designed as a slender form with recessed floorplates and curved translucent corners inspired by contemporary Japanese architecture. The building height aligns with the Commercial Road precinct controls, which permit towers up to 15 storeys within proximity to Longland Street.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a8a17d40-43b6-4718-b3fd-67676fcbb485" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers%202_1.png?VersionId=i3VwDtp5AmL_8InW7w4qRbDFEpb744Jt" />

The project will comprise a mix of larger-format apartments aimed at owner-occupiers, downsizers, and families. The proposed apartment mix includes 11 loggia apartments across the lower levels, 50 four-bedroom Sky-Terrace apartments from levels three to seven, and 32 Sky-Pool Homes occupying the upper tower levels. The Sky-Pool Homes will feature private thermal plunge pools integrated into oversized balconies.

According to the application, the apartments are intended to reinterpret the scale and character of Teneriffe’s woolstore conversions and Queensland homes within a vertical residential format.

“The sky-pool homes build on Cavcorp’s previous projects and introduce a distinct apartment typology to Teneriffe, informed by both local and international precedent and responding to an identified market demand for enhanced safety, space and amenity,” the planning submission notes.

A major focus of the proposal is its five-level wellness and lifestyle offering, extending from the basement through to the rooftop.

Amenities proposed include a rooftop Swim &amp; Racquet Club with a 25-metre Olympic lap pool and tennis court, coworking spaces and libraries, golf simulators, wine storage, concierge facilities, business lounges, pet wash areas, and rooftop longevity-focused wellness spaces with spas, outdoor fitness zones, and landscaped terraces.

<img alt="First Look: Cavcorp unveils Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane plans for landmark wellness tower in Teneriffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="944b352c-49b9-4247-a4c6-5967b4b69fda" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/amenity.png?VersionId=Ed_qKjAtMwFT.5gfl3jiA9QwdWxSMsaX" />

All parking will be concealed within basement levels accessed from Wyandra and Helen Streets. Cavcorp says the deep-basement engineering approach allows the entire ground plane to prioritise landscaping, pedestrian movement, and active frontage rather than vehicle infrastructure.

The development continues Cavcorp’s concentration in Newstead and Teneriffe, where the Brisbane developer has delivered a number of apartment projects including Lucent, Le Bain, and Luminare, as well as the Long Island Wellness Precinct nearby. Several of those projects have received national design and architecture awards, including recognition under Brisbane’s “Buildings that Breathe” program.

Cavcorp unveils wellness-focused Teneriffe House and Teneriffe Lane apartment buildings

Focus Group Investments has lodged plans for a new apartment development at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/64-70-hanover-street-fitzroy-vic-3065">64–70 Hanover Street</a> in Fitzroy, seeking to utilise the Victorian Government’s recently introduced Great Design Fast Track pathway to accelerate approvals for the project.

The proposal is among the latest developments to emerge through the state-led initiative, which was established to fast-track well-designed residential projects in activity centres and transport-connected inner-city locations. The pathway allows qualifying developments that meet elevated design and housing benchmarks to bypass traditional council planning timeframes and instead be assessed directly by the Department of Transport and Planning.

Designed by SJB, the development will comprise a mix of apartments above activated lower levels, with a strong focus on architectural articulation, landscaping, and communal amenity. The design response seeks to balance the industrial character of Richmond’s former warehouse precincts with a more contemporary residential form.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="abea51cc-d85b-479e-9aef-a589f3b37ca7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ground.png?VersionId=e1Kf8EyPWwyiVumtqQ4rM5S4GpOR3CCz" />

Proposed are 63 new dwellings, a wide ranging mix of studio, one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, and townhouses and duplexes. They will be spread across a part-three, part-eight storey building.

The Planning and Urban Context Report by Tract says the development is of an "exemplary architectural standard" and has been carefully crafted by SJB Architects.

"Dwellings&nbsp;will benefit from excellent access to natural light, cross-ventilation opportunities and extensive communal space," the report noted.

The architectural material highlights the project’s integration of landscaped elements and communal spaces throughout the building. The proposal also incorporates sustainability initiatives aligned with the Victorian Government’s push for higher-performing apartment developments under the fast-track program.

The Great Design Fast Track was unveiled by the Victorian Government in 2024 as part of a broader housing supply strategy aimed at accelerating the delivery of new homes. Projects assessed through the pathway must demonstrate high-quality architecture, sustainability outcomes, and housing diversity while being located close to public transport and existing infrastructure.

<img alt="First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Richmond apartments" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afdbe834-8dc4-4a77-a943-ba07bc927348" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/site_11.png?VersionId=0J657j.TaChAZfp93wqJYBTqSsnREJx2" />

Focus Group, founder and led by Paul De Lutiis, is increasingly active across Melbourne’s inner suburbs, targeting well-connected urban renewal locations suited to medium and higher-density residential development. The Fitzroy proposal continues that strategy, leveraging the area’s strong transport links, established retail amenity, and proximity to the CBD.

Fitzroy has been one of the most popular spots for developers and buyers in recent years. The likes of PACE Development Group, SMA Projects, Crema Group and Chapter Group, currently selling projects in the suburb.

First look: Focus Group Investments taps Victoria’s Great Design Fast Track for Fitzroy apartments

The Gold Coast Planning Committee has supported the preliminary approval for the Benowa Gardens Urban Village project following an extensive community consultation and assessment process.

The proposal will now proceed to a full council vote on June 2.

The application sought approval for a masterplanned urban village on the existing Benowa Gardens Shopping Centre site, combining new housing, retail, dining, health and lifestyle amenities within a walkable, integrated precinct.&nbsp;

The proposed redevelopment includes around 413 apartments integrated above a revitalised mixed-use centre featuring a full-line supermarket of 4,000 sqm, 6,000 sqm of specialty retail and dining space across around 30 retailers, a 7,000 sqm health and wellness precinct, and roughly 9,630 sqm of office and medical suites.&nbsp;

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fb36ae47-80bc-45f0-9914-31b0c7b6007d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C4%201121%20FI.jpg?VersionId=6mRKk2uU4r67TmTt39DKGUlvFRbTVqWa" />

The broader masterplan also includes very significant traffic and transport improvements, wide pedestrian walkways, upgraded pedestrian and cycle connections, and enhanced public areas designed to create a more connected and walkable community environment.&nbsp;

Centre owner Patrick Lu said the milestone reflected months of detailed planning, technical assessment and ongoing communication with local residents, businesses, schools and stakeholders.

“We appreciate the time, consideration and care Council officers and the Planning Committee have given this proposal throughout the assessment process,” Lu said.

“We also sincerely thank the local community for engaging with us, sharing feedback and participating in the consultation process over many months.

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="32fd1fc3-d0e6-485f-ac57-9916c9bcb818" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/PR26576%20Ashmore%20Road%20C5%201121%20FI_2.jpg?VersionId=fz8qQKDBLQ7MyFRc856Zccfbh9nFwLOe" />

“We understand projects of this scale bring questions and concerns, which is why we have worked hard to listen carefully, provide information transparently and continue refining elements of the proposal where possible.

“Our vision has always been to create a well-designed, community-focused urban village that responds to the changing needs of the Gold Coast, while delivering improved amenity, housing diversity, healthcare access and local lifestyle benefits.

“This proposal is about creating a genuine live-work-play environment where residents can access everyday services, schools, healthcare, dining, shopping and green space within walking distance, while also supporting local jobs and economic activity.”

<img alt="$1b Benowa Gardens Urban Village moves to Full Council following Planning Committee support" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="50dfbd04-590e-4fc6-983b-766880947867" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Dining%20Day%20Time%20-%20High%20Resolution.jpg?VersionId=BP7ZoKJ0DdL_8iRkkC8VVx99moICV6kg" />

Lu said the proposal had evolved significantly through consultation and technical review, particularly around traffic, pedestrian and student safety and neighbourhood connectivity.&nbsp;

Melissa Griffin, Director at Urbis, said the recommendation recognised the strategic importance of delivering more housing and services within established urban areas already supported by infrastructure.

“This proposal represents the type of thoughtful, integrated growth that planning frameworks across South-East Queensland are encouraging,” Ms Griffin said.

“The project seeks to place housing, retail, healthcare and employment opportunities together in a highly accessible location close to schools, transport and existing services.

“Importantly, the process has involved significant technical assessment and community engagement to ensure local issues and feedback were properly considered throughout the planning pathway.”

$1 billion Benowa Gardens Urban Village heads to council vote following Planning Committee support

Surfers Paradise is officially set for its first new residential development with a 45-storey skybridge connecting the two towers.

John Camilleri’s Celestino Developments has been given the green light by the Gold Coast City Council to develop its major beachfront precinct across its huge 4,000 sqm oceanfront site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/63-79-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">63–79 Garfield Terrace</a>, just five months after its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-billionaire-winx-breeder-s-bold-two-tower-surfers-paradise-play-with-45th-storey-skybridge">submission in late 2025</a>.

The approved scheme will deliver two towers rising 55 and 48 storeys, connected by a skybridge positioned on level 45 that will house a range of resident-only wellness and entertainment spaces.

In its notice of approval, the Gold Coast City Council said the&nbsp;proposed overall built form has been designed to complement the scale, intensity and protect the adjacent amenity and surrounding streets through the use of varied setbacks, site cover and architectural elements.

<img alt="First look exclusive: Billionaire Winx breeder’s bold two-tower Surfers Paradise play with 45th-storey skybridge" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-30%20at%209.53.48%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=ADyPJ_TFbJvSU9wZFOiCBnlPtgF7VWqW" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/dbi">DBI</a>, the development will comprise 275 apartments across the two towers, including a mix of two-, three-, and four-bedroom residences, as well as several penthouses. The apartments will sit above a landscaped podium featuring more than 90 metres of beachfront pool frontage, private resident lawns, lounges, and wellness spaces.

DBI said the design draws heavily from the movement and form of the coastal environment, with curving balcony lines and sculpted façades intended to soften the scale of the towers while maximising ocean outlooks and passive shading outcomes.

“The project occupies a rare, uninterrupted oceanfront site and has been shaped by a design philosophy that merges architectural elegance with environmental responsiveness and a carefully curated lifestyle experience,” DBI said in planning documents submitted to the Gold Coast City Council.

The most distinctive element of the approved project is the skybridge linking the two towers at level 45. The elevated communal space is planned to include executive lounges, formal dining areas, wellness facilities, and panoramic ocean-facing outlooks.

“The skybridge enhances the identity of the development, promotes social interaction, and delivers a lifestyle experience not found elsewhere on the Gold Coast,” DBI said.

At podium level, residents will have access to a suite of resort-style amenities, including resident lounges, private dining rooms, a yoga lawn, gymnasium, plunge pools, and treatment spaces. The beachfront pool has been designed with separate lap, lounge, and children’s areas extending across the width of the site.

The project will also introduce new food and beverage offerings along the Enderley Avenue and Oceanway frontages, contributing additional activation to the beachfront precinct.

First look: Winx billionaire’s beachfront Surfers Paradise apartment development greenlit

Sydney’s property market is known for high prices, competitive bidding, and mounting pressure on first home buyers. But change is on the horizon.

From late 2025, eligible first home buyers in New South Wales will have access to a new federal government initiative aimed at addressing affordability: the Help to Buy Scheme.&nbsp;

<h2>What is the Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

The program introduces a shared equity model intended to reduce the upfront cost of entering the property market, particularly in high-demand urban areas such as Sydney.

The scheme operates under a shared ownership structure in which the federal government takes an equity stake of up to 40 per cent for new homes, or 30 per cent for existing dwellings. This arrangement allows eligible buyers to significantly reduce their loan size and avoid the added cost of Lenders Mortgage Insurance (LMI).

Under this model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required. The government’s contribution is not a loan but a co-ownership stake in the property. As such, there is no interest or rent charged on its portion.

Because the government’s equity combined with the buyer’s deposit typically meets or exceeds the 20 per cent threshold, LMI does not apply. The remaining balance, generally between 60 and 70 per cent of the property’s value, is financed through a standard home loan with a participating lender.

The government's equity in the property remains in place until the buyer chooses to repay it voluntarily or until the property is sold. Buyers can buy back the government’s share over time, in increments of at least five per cent, depending on their financial situation.

There is no fixed repayment timeline, but the amount to be repaid will be based on the property's market value at the time of repayment, not the original purchase price.

<h2>How do you qualify for the&nbsp;Help to Buy Scheme?</h2>

To qualify for the Help to Buy Scheme, applicants must meet the following conditions:

<ul>
	<li>Be an Australian citizen at least 18 years of age.</li>
	<li>Be a first-home buyer who does not currently own property.</li>
	<li>Intend to live in the property as their primary residence.</li>
	<li>Earn less than $100,000 per year for individuals, or $160,000 for couples.</li>
	<li>Purchase a property within the regional price caps, currently $950,000 in Sydney, though this is expected to rise to approximately $1.3 million ahead of the program’s launch.</li>
</ul>

While the Help to Buy Scheme does not solve affordability challenges across the board, it does offer a more accessible pathway for a defined segment of the market, particularly younger buyers with moderate incomes who have been priced out of traditional lending routes.

The scheme is expected to commence in NSW in late 2025, as part of a national rollout.

Under the new model, purchasers can enter the property market with as little as a two per cent deposit, well below the traditional 10 to 20 per cent usually required

Help to Buy Scheme: What first home buyers in NSW need to know

The First Home Owners Grant (FHOG) is a government initiative designed to help eligible first-time home buyers by offering financial assistance towards the purchase or construction of a new home.

While the FHOG is a nationwide program, it is administered separately by each state and territory, meaning the eligibility criteria, grant amounts, and property requirements can vary depending on your location. This means that the amount available and the conditions attached to the grant will differ, so it is important to check the specific guidelines for your state or territory.

It’s important to note that the FHOG is just one of several incentives available to first home buyers. In most states and territories, the grant is not linked to stamp duty exemptions or concessions, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The FHOG is typically a one-off payment, reducing the overall cost of purchasing or building a new home before any stamp duty concessions are applied.

Below, we provide a breakdown of the First Home Owner Grants available across Australia, outlining the specific details for each state and territory.

<h2>New South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $600,000. For land purchases and owner-builders, the threshold extends to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Provides full stamp duty exemption for homes valued up to $800,000, with concessions available for properties up to $1 million.

<h2>Victoria South Wales First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides a $10,000 grant for first-home buyers purchasing or building new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Benefits: Offers full stamp duty exemption for properties up to $600,000, with concessions available up to $750,000.

<h2>Queensland First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers $30,000 for contracts signed between 20 November 2023 and 30 June 2025. The FHOG applies to new homes valued up to $750,000.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Provides additional concessions for properties valued up to $800,000.

<h2>Western Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

&nbsp;

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes valued up to $750,000 in the southern regions and up to $1 million in the northern regions.

Stamp Duty Concessions: Available for homes valued up to $600,000 for transactions entered into on or after 9 May 2024.

<h2>Australian Capital Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Replaced by the Home Buyer Concession Scheme, offering full stamp duty concessions for eligible buyers.

<h2>South Australia First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Provides up to $15,000 for new homes, including houses, apartments, and townhouses. As of 6 June 2024, there is no property value cap for eligibility.

Stamp Duty Relief: Available for new homes and vacant land purchases.

<h2>Tasmania First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: Offers a $10,000 grant for new homes and off the plan purchases.

Stamp Duty Exemption: Between 18 February 2024 and 30 June 2026, first home buyers of established homes valued up to $750,000 receive a full exemption on property transfer duty.

<h2>Northern Territory First Home Owner Grant</h2>

First Home Owner Grant: The Northern Territory provides a $10,000 grant for new homes only. Additional government grants and concessions are available for first home buyers.

Stamp Duty Exemption: The only stamp duty exemption available to property buyers is the House and Land Package Exemption (HLPE).

Eligibility criteria and application processes differ across states. Prospective buyers should refer to their respective state revenue offices for full details on grant availability, conditions, and additional concessions.

Every First Home Owner Grant for new property by state

In the ever-evolving landscape of sustainable architecture and environmentally conscious design, systems and ratings in place can help determine the energy efficiency of residential buildings in Australia.

Australia has multiple building rating systems that evaluate energy efficiency and sustainability in existing and new building designs.

Some systems assess individual building components, while others provide an overall rating for the entire structure.

A rating system ensures that homes are comfortable and energy-efficient, whether you are buying, renovating, or building.

NatHERS (Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme) is a common way for new homes to meet energy efficiency requirements.

As new developments continue to shape the urban environment, understanding NatHERS ratings becomes essential for developers and homeowners. This article delves into the concept of NatHERS ratings, their significance, and how they contribute to creating energy-efficient homes.

<h2>What is NatHERS?</h2>

NatHERS is a national initiative implemented by the Australian government to promote energy efficiency in residential buildings. The scheme aims to provide a standardised method for assessing the thermal performance of homes, considering factors such as insulation, orientation, ventilation, and building materials.&nbsp;

NatHERS ratings are the most common way new homes meet the National Construction Code's (NCC's) minimum energy efficiency requirements.&nbsp;

NatHERS assessments provide thermal and whole-home ratings for new homes, townhouses, and apartments.

The rating helps evaluate the energy performance of buildings, guides homeowners and developers to make informed decisions about the energy efficiency of their properties, and encourages the construction of more sustainable, comfortable, and cost-effective homes.

<h2>How NatHERS Ratings Work</h2>

NatHERS ratings are determined through four accredited software tools (AccuRate, BERS Pro, FirstRate5, HERO) using a calculation engine CSIRO developed to predict building temperature based on various factors.

The tools can model complex effects of building mass, insulation, window size, and other elements.

The outcome is a star rating that reflects the building's overall thermal efficiency, indicating how well it can maintain a comfortable indoor temperature without excessive reliance on heating or cooling systems.

The star rating scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a 6-star rating being the minimum requirement for compliance with the National Construction Code (NCC).&nbsp;

Achieving a higher star rating demonstrates a commitment to energy efficiency and sustainability, as the building is better equipped to minimise its environmental impact and reduce long-term energy costs.

Anyone can use NatHERS tools, but accredited assessors can provide certified ratings and professional advice.

<h2>Benefits of Higher NatHERS Ratings</h2>

Energy Efficiency: Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings are more energy-efficient, requiring less heating and cooling energy. This reduces the structure's carbon footprint and lowers occupants' energy bills.

Cost Savings: Homes with higher NatHERS ratings are generally more energy-efficient, resulting in reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. This translates to lower energy bills for homeowners, making sustainable living environmentally friendly and economically viable in the long run.

Environmental Impact: Lower energy consumption directly translates to a reduced environmental impact. Buildings with higher NatHERS ratings contribute to the overall goal of mitigating climate change by lowering greenhouse gas emissions associated with heating and cooling systems.

Improved Comfort: Buildings with high NatHERS ratings offer better thermal comfort to occupants. Proper insulation, well-designed ventilation, and optimal orientation maintain a consistent and comfortable indoor temperature, providing occupants with a more enjoyable and healthier space.

Market Value and Desirability: Higher NatHERS ratings can enhance the market value of a property. As energy efficiency becomes a more significant consideration for homebuyers, a well-rated building may attract a premium price and stand out in the real estate market.

Compliance with Building Codes: NatHERS ratings are a vital component of the National Construction Code (NCC), and compliance with these ratings is often a mandatory requirement for new developments. Local councils and planning authorities may set minimum energy efficiency standards that must be met to obtain development approval.

The Nationwide House Energy Rating Scheme (NatHERS) is a crucial initiative shaping the future of energy-efficient, resilient, and cost-effective homes. With its recent upgrades, NatHERS has evolved into a world-leading tool for the building sector, supporting the global commitment to achieving net-zero emissions by 2050.

Staff Writer

What is a NatHERS rating in new off the plan apartment developments?

Mixed-use developments have gained significant popularity across Australia in recent years due to their unique blend of residential, commercial, and recreational spaces.

Unlike traditional single-purpose developments, mixed-use projects offer a harmonious integration of various functions within a single locale.

Residential units seamlessly coexist with commercial establishments, retail outlets, dining venues, entertainment hubs, and recreational facilities, with the combination not only enhances convenience but also fosters a vibrant lifestyle and a sense of community.

<h3>Convenience and accessibility</h3>

Mixed-use developments are designed with convenience in mind. They often integrate residential units with commercial spaces, retail outlets, restaurants, and recreational facilities, creating a self-contained community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=114215 project_image_fid=204874]

The proximity allows residents to enjoy the convenience of having essential amenities and services within walking distance. Whether it's grabbing a cup of coffee, going grocery shopping, or accessing healthcare services, everything is conveniently located, saving residents time and effort.

<h3>Vibrant lifestyle and community</h3>

One of the major advantages of mixed-use developments is the vibrant lifestyle they offer. With a diverse range of amenities and communal spaces, residents have ample opportunities to interact, socialise, and build a sense of community.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107714 project_image_fid=214122]

The presence of parks, community centres, and shared spaces fosters a lively atmosphere, encouraging residents to engage in various activities and events. The vibrant lifestyle within these developments creates a unique sense of belonging and camaraderie among the residents.

<h3>Potential for higher rental yields and property value appreciation</h3>

Mixed-use developments tend to attract a broad range of tenants and buyers due to their versatile nature. This high demand can result in higher rental yields for investors and potentially lead to property value appreciation over time.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=139989 project_image_fid=212887]

The integration of commercial and retail spaces attracts businesses, which can provide a stable rental income stream. Additionally, the popularity of mixed-use developments often drives up property values, making them a potentially lucrative investment in the long term.

<h3>Enhanced security and maintenance</h3>

Mixed-use developments typically have comprehensive security measures in place. With controlled access points, CCTV surveillance, and professional security staff, residents can enjoy enhanced safety and peace of mind.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108019 project_image_fid=212658]

Additionally, these developments often have dedicated maintenance teams responsible for the upkeep of common areas, landscaping, and infrastructure. This ensures that the overall appearance and functionality of the development are well-maintained, creating a pleasant living environment for residents.

<h3>Live-work-play balance</h3>

One of the key attractions of mixed-use developments is the ability to achieve a desirable live-work-play balance. The integration of residential and commercial spaces allows residents to live closer to their workplaces, reducing commuting time and improving work-life balance.

The proximity to various amenities and recreational facilities encourages an active and healthy lifestyle. Residents can easily access fitness centres, parks, restaurants, and entertainment options, all within the same development, leading to a more fulfilling and convenient way of life.

alisonwarters@gmail.com

The top five reasons to buy in a mixed-use development

When buying a property, everyone needs to be aware of the additional costs that come as part of the buying process.

Often the largest outlay, after the deposit which goes to the bank, is stamp duty.

<h2 style="line-height: 1.38;">What is Stamp Duty?</h2>

Stamp duty is an extra tax to pay the government when you buy land, a property, and other certain assets.

It happens when the legal ownership is transferred. It can also be known as property transfer duty or transfer duty.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="415" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/C32BWkB5--c" title="YouTube video player" width="660"></iframe>

<h2>Who pays Stamp Duty?</h2>

In some circumstances, you may get an exemption. For some states, you won’t have to pay for stamp duty if you are a first home buyer or a pensioner for houses under a particular price. There are also stamp duty concessions, where you may be entitled to a discount.

<h2>How much does Stamp Duty cost?</h2>

Each state has different rules which affect how much you need to pay. These rules can affect the rate you pay, and the timeframe you will need to pay in. Before you buy land or a property, make sure you check the up-to-date information for your state’s stamp duty.

You can use a free stamp duty calculator online to see approximately how much you’ll need to pay. Find out if you’re eligible for an exemption by enquiring on a project via Urban!

Overall, the stamp duty you need to pay will depend on:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1">How much your land/property is worth</li>
	<li aria-level="1">Where your land/property is located</li>
	<li aria-level="1">What type of land/property it is</li>
</ul>

Want to find out more? <a href="https://www.youtube.com/@UrbanAustralia?utm_source=YouTube&amp;utm_medium=Video&amp;utm_campaign=Subscribe&amp;utm_id=Subscribe">Subscribe to our YouTube channel</a> for more property videos.

Ellen Walker

Off-the-plan property explained: What is stamp duty?

Prominent New Zealand apartment and hotel operator, <a href="/developers/safari-group">Safari Group</a>, is offering up a prime investment opportunity for Australians to purchase off the plan in one of the world’s most popular ski destinations.

They recently took to market Mountain Oak Queenstown Apartments, in the growing precinct of Remarkables Park in Frankton, near the airport and at the foot of The Remarkables - the mountain range the locals like to call “The Remarks”.&nbsp;

Sydney investors have shown interest in the one, two and three-bedroom apartments that secure high-season occupancy six months over the year, primarily over summer and winter months.

They average 90 per cent occupancy across their portfolio over January, February, March, August, November and December, while shoulder season months of April, July, September and October are still occupied 70 per cent of the time, with the growing appeal of Queenstown becoming not just a hotspot for the snow, but a lifestyle destination.

Even in the low seasons of May and June, occupancy levels reach around 40 per cent.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_auto/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Ext_Cam15_Sunny.jpg?VersionId=SJAROUM_1s.Tr5ciMk4EEj5oAt_Vewmv" />

Safari’s Safari Hotels arm can also manage the holiday letting for an investor, from the listing on holiday accommodation websites such as Airbnb and Booking.com to the cleaning and maintenance of the investment. They’ve been in the short stay management business for 15 years and offer 24/7 support for investors, an important convenience benefit for any overseas investor

Another major drawcard for Australians is that New Zealand doesn’t have a stamp duty policy - so the entry price of NZ$639,000 (AU$586,000), is all that is payable on completion.

<img alt="Safari Group’s Mountain Oak Apartments brings new investment potential to Queenstown" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/313_Livingv2_WEB.jpg?VersionId=nV229fM0ZeYpoxOrX372HyGjfwY_LR8c" />

Safari is starting construction of the 141 apartments in Q2 this year, with a two-year build estimated to complete in mid-to-late 2027.<img alt="" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" height="15" src="https://lh7-rt.googleusercontent.com/docsz/AD_4nXczFpFAb7WuA6f4f9TtKWcqXyNwR8qqtakWv352ERkpqNlP3KwIo8YKxw67jZNHfpjEGIZGv5MQTbnvLZwNt8iu9IVdOrswOjCvBZ4zhSoOOLrpt6etVEZTN1gkBho0r_R72zdHNA?key=yq3daOanqHSb88QFd8jGYKdb" title="Click and drag to move" width="15" />​

The apartments will feature modern amenities and contemporary designs with expansive windows capturing sweeping views of The Remarkables mountain range.&nbsp;

Interiors are equipped with modern finishes, premium appliances, and secure electronic key-locked doors, ensuring a comfortable living experience for residents and guests alike.

With its strategic location near Coronet Peak and Cardrona Alpine Resort, as well as key retail and dining precincts such as Market Street, Five Mile Shopping Centre, and Remarkables Market, Mountain Oak offers a strong proposition for investors seeking high rental yields and capital appreciation in one of New Zealand’s most sought-after locations.&nbsp;

Queenstown’s sustained demand for visitor accommodation and rental properties is underpinned by a shortage of housing options, attracting both local and international buyers.

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

<html><body>
Plummeting first-home buyer numbers have raised fresh questions about recently introduced first-home buyer grant schemes on offer in NSW as well as raise issues about current housing affordability. 
The number of loans to first-home buyers in December 2012 fell to 14.9% according to ABS figures, the fourth consecutive month that this segment of the market has declined.
This a 37% decline on figures from a year ago when first-home buyers accounted for more than one in five new home loans (21.1%).
This was the weakest proportion of first-home buyers in the housing market since June 2004 and just two percentage points off the record low of 12.8% in March 2004 for ABS figures going back to July 1991.
The decline suggests that the new first-home owner grants in Queensland and NSW, which provide generous handouts of $15,000 – but only for those who buy or build new homes – have missed the mark and are as claimed by the likes of Ray White chairman Brian White nothing more than a builder or developer incentive.
In addition they suggest housing remains unaffordable or undesirable for most prospective first-home buyers with low mortgage rates and a decline in capital city house prices over the last few years failing to spur this segment of the market in a meaningful way.
The fall was sharpest in NSW, where there was a 3.2% decline as well as a smaller 0.8% drop in Queensland and a 1.9% decline in WA. 
“The state detail was something of a surprise,” notes Westpac, who called the December figures “another weak reading” for first-home buyer activity. 
“We had expected unwinding first-home buyer demand in NSW (from an earlier bring-forward relating to state government changes) to have run its course by December with weakness to instead centre on Victoria where stamp duty concessions coming in from January 1 would have encouraged many FHBs to delay purchases. 
“Instead, the sharp slide in NSW continued (–3.2%) with Victoria posting a slight rise (+0.3% for the month). 
Westpac estimates that approvals in this segment were down another 5.7% in December on a seasonally- adjusted basis.  
First-home buyer numbers peaked in May 2009 following of the doubling of the first-home owners grant to $14,000 for those buying existing homes and trebling it to $21,000 for those buy newly built homes in October 2008. 
First home buyers as percentage of home lending dating back to 1991 (ABS)
 
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="415"><tbody>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Month
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Number of FHB loans
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
% of new loans
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Size of loan ($)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1991
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
5654
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
20.7
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
71.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1992
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7733
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
76.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1993
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10139
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
83.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1994
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7789
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
90.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1995
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7218
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
89.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1996
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8427
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
23.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
99.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1997
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8047
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
104.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1998
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8651
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
120.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1999
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10264
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
134.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2000
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9654
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
123.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2001
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
12745
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
25.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
146.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2002
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7998
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
15.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
160.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2003
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7618
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
13.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
185.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Mar-2004*
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7083
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
12.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
191.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jun-2004**
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7428
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
204.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2004
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8845
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
16.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
210.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2005
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10811
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
217.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2006
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10241
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
228.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2007
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
11282
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
230.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2008
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14142
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
27.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
271.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
May 2009***
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18744
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
31.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
279.4
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2009
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
11793
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
23.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
293.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2010
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8199
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
289.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2011
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10264
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.1
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
285.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jan-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8043
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
20.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
282.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Feb-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7360
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
279.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Mar-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7902
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
16.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
281.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Apr-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7077
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
282.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
May-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9110
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.1
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jun-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8415
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
292.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jul-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8760
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
291.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Aug-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8921
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Sep-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8391
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
289.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Oct-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9215
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.7
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Nov-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7921
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
15.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
287.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
6557
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
293.9
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Source: ABS
*Record lowest proportion of first-home buyers
**Previous lowest proportion of first homebuyers after December 2012
***Highest proportion of first-home buyers
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

First-home buyers at lowest share of new home loans in more than eight years: historical data to 1991

<html><body>
More evidence has emerged of the damaging impact that changes to first-home buyer grants in NSW and Queensland are having on home buyer sentiment.
First-home buyer (FHB) sentiment fell 12.8% according to the latest <a href="/news">Genworth</a> Homebuyer Confidence Index, driving a 5.1% fall in the overall index – its lowest level since 2008.
The bi-annual index, a measure of home buyer and would-be home buyer sentiment, fell from 98.4 to 93.4 over the six-month period while the first-home buyer sub-index fell from 98.5 to 85.9.
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/2013/03/genworthmarch27one.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2013/03/genworthmarch27onethumb.gif"></a>
“Changes to incentives in New South Wales and Queensland states may be affecting FHB con?dence more broadly, with New South Wales having the lowest proportion of prospective FHBs who thought now was a good time to buy a home,” the report says.
“New South Wales and Queensland both saw a large fall in the number of FHBs in the market, according to ABS data, of 56% and 66% respectively between September 2012 and January 2013.”
In addition, mortgage stress among FHBs is rising with the report finding that 41% of recent first-home buyers are expecting difficulty with mortgage repayments over the coming year – up from 18% in September 2012. 
The fall in the overall index was primarily driven by a 42% increase in the proportion of borrowers who expect to experience mortgage stress over the next 12 months rising from 18% in September 2012 to 27% in March 2013.
“The sharp rise in the proportion of surveyed FHBs experiencing and anticipating hardship follows the removal of FHB incentives on established dwellings in New SouthWales and Queensland, which went into effect in October 2012.
“Amongst FHBs in Queensland, over-commitment/borrowing was cited as the main reason for expecting mortgage stress," says the report.
Bridget Sakr, chief commercial officer of Genworth, says the changes to government grants led to a bigger drop in first-home buyer confidence compared with the overall decline in the index.
The changes to the FHB grants impacted on the ability of FHBs to purchase the properties they want, Sakr told Property Observer.
She highlighted the findings of the report that fewer than one in four FHBs wanted to buy a new home.
Despite this sharp fall in FHB confidence, time to buy a home sentiment is still higher than it was a year ago, though it too fell from 54% of FHBs to 49% as of March 2013.
“FHBs still aspire to own a home, this has increased from last year, but most want an established home in an area they want to live,” Sakr says.
“The grant removals have hindered them from being able to do that.”
</body></html>

FHB grant changes drive home buyer confidence to lowest level since 2008: Genworth

<html><body>
Last week I was assisting a client with her dual occupancy construction finance. We have Development Application (DA) and Construction Certificate (CC) consents and the builder has issued their Building Contract. The bank now has all the documentation required to unconditionally approve her construction finance.
They had conditionally approved her loan a few weeks earlier after verifying income and assessing serviceability and all the other stuff they do after you sign a mountain of loan docs. The next step was for the bank to value the two dwellings and then they could finalise the construction loan.
Her bank did an "As if Complete" valuation. This is also known as a Tentative on Completion valuation. It's when the bank value the project before it's constructed but based on how they think it will be completed.  lf it's more than one dwelling - a dual occupancy or multi unit project - they look for a value of the property '"in one line". This means not subdivided. If the bank had to sell the dwellings all on the original title, what would they get for them?
The number one, massive, biggest, fattest, most frustrating issue with this type of valuation  is that there are generally NO sales references. Who in their right mind would sell in one line if given the choice of making far more profit by subdividing?
When there are no sales references in one line, it is up to the valuer to determine how they discount the end values if the dwellings were on their own title.  Valuers must take legal responsibility for their opinion. The valuer needs to cover themselves in the instance that the bank may need to fire sell the properties together on one title of land.
The process of subdivision after building works are complete, whilst not complicated, can take a number of months to get to the registration stage. Yet the builder's final payment is due on completion of construction.
The Australian Property Institute publish a very interesting document on valuation standards. It's 395 pages long. That's how complicated the valuation process can be.  It covers valuations for different purposes such as market, mortgage and loan security, rating and taxing, for compulsory acquisitions, for assessing rental value, for property plant and material, for insurance purposes and to use in financial reports. 
In this instance due to no direct sales the valuer will possibly use a gross realisation of the dwellings assuming they are subdivided and on separate titles and then deduct a profit and risk factor, holding and selling costs to arrive at their valuation figure. 
They may also take into consideration a capitalisation of the gross income and use an acceptable market capitalisation rate or cap rate. 
In my opinion, without actual sales references of properties sold in one line, the valuer will be super conservative in their calculations and hence, a low On Completion valuation may be received. This is one of the perils of construction finance and so a buffer of cash should be put aside in case the construction loan requires supplementing. 
Applying for and then finally receiving approval of, construction finance can be one of the most lengthy phases of a development project. It can take longer than obtaining the DA consent and in some cases, has taken longer than the construction phase itself!  So be careful to allow, not only enough extra funds, but also time for your construction finance.
Jo Chivers is chief executive officer of property development project managers <a href="https://www.propertybloom.com.au/about" target="_blank">Property Bloom</a>.
</body></html>

jochivers-wq5Bp59R5a

The complicated process of valuation: Jo Chivers

<html><body>
Friday last week encapsulated all that’s wrong in the reporting of real estate in Australia. “Rental prices continue to soar” screamed one headline, while “Rental prices in Australia are going backwards” shouted another. 
How did different media outlets come to such different conclusions? One published the press release on The Domain Rental Report and the other published the handout from the CoreLogic Rental Index. 
As is so often the case, the statistics from one research source are different from those on the same subject from a competing source. Newspapers and other forms of media report each in isolation, often running the press release pretty much verbatim, without applying any journalistic oversight. 
No one looks at the material on the one subject from all sources and analyses it to make some sense of it for readers. 
Sometimes the numbers from two different sources aren’t that different. It’s just that one research entity will choose to place a negative slant on the figures and media will go with that, while another researcher will emphasise the positive.
The lack of genuine journalism on these matters is quite alarming. The content and tone of the press release is re-cycled to the public as news.
The result is confusion and misinformation, the curse of real estate consumers trying to figure out what’s really going on and make good decisions on investment.
So what can we make of the national rental data published by two major sources on the same day recently?
The reality is that they’re not actually so different. One chose to take a negative stance and the other decided to paint a brighter picture.
Here’s where Domain agrees with CoreLogic:
<ul>
<li>Both see rents going seriously backwards in Darwin. The annual decline in rents is in double digits, according to both sources.</li>
<li>Rents in Perth are still falling, though not as much as in Darwin, according to both.</li>
<li>Both sources see only moderate growth in rents in Sydney.</li>
<li>Both sources see minor growth in Melbourne, around 2-3 percent in annual terms.</li>
</ul>
And here’s where they don’t agree.
<ul>
<li>Domain records 2-3 percent growth in Brisbane, but CoreLogic reports a marginal fall.</li>
<li>Domain sees minor growth in Adelaide, but CoreLogic has rents down 1 percent annually.</li>
<li>CoreLogic reports essentially no change in Hobart, but Domain reports a 6 percent annual rise in house rents and a 2 percent rise in apartment rents.</li>
<li>CoreLogic records a 1.2 percent rise in its Canberra Rental Index but Domain sees bigger increases in rents in the capital.</li>
</ul>
It basically comes down to this: while there are a number of similarities, Domain’s figures overall are more positive than CoreLogic’s and it chose to take an optimistic outlet.
“Rents in most capital cities continue to rise, with falling vacancy rates indicating an ongoing shortage of rental properties,” said Domain chief economist Andrew Wilson.
“Despite the recent influx of home building, we can expect to see upward pressure on both houses and unit rents in most capital cities continuing in the foreseeable future.” 
But the CoreLogic analysis said the “annual capital city rental change is in decline and is now the lowest since 1996”.
My take on all this, having observed the quarterly rental data coming from all the usual suspects over the past 2-3 years, is that capital city rental growth has been consistently low over that period. While there are occasional exceptions, the capital cities have failed to deliver strong growth in rentals for years – and, in the case of Perth and Darwin, rents have dropped substantially.
Domain has chosen to be upbeat on its latest figures, but really they show very little in the way of strong, meaningful growth in rents.
It provides further evidence that the “housing shortage crisis” consistently claimed by the developer lobby is another of real estate’s enduring myths.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Housing shortage crisis an enduring myth: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
The common perception of first-home buyers as 20-somethings may need to be reconsidered, with a new survey showing a declining trend in first-home buyers aged 29 and under and a rising proportion of buyers aged 40 and over.
A Mortgage Choice online survey of 1,000 Australians who plan to buy their first home in the next two years found that the greatest proportion of first-home buyers (41%) are aged between 30 and 39, compared with 39% aged 18 to 29.
The proportion of prospective first-home buyers aged 40 and over was 20%, or one in five.
These results build on earlier online polls that show a trend of first-home buyers choosing to purchase when they are older and a marked decline in younger buyers.
The Mortgage Choice 2011 recent first-home owner survey found that the majority of first-home buyers (55%) were aged between 18 and 29, this itself a fall from a 2010 survey when 63% of respondents were in this age bracket.
The 2011 survey also found that 34% of recent first-home buyers were aged between 30 and 39, and only 11% were aged 40 and over.
Mortgage Choice spokesperson Belinda Williamson says the results of the survey show that “more first-home buyers are saving for longer and purchasing later in life, perhaps when they are in a better financial position”.
Other findings of the 2012 survey tie in with the shift towards older first-home buyers, with the average period to save for a deposit increasing from 1.8 years in the 2011 survey to two years in 2012.
It also found that job security concerns have increased notably since 2011, with 18% of 2012 respondents claiming it to be their biggest concern, compared with 11% last year.
Conversely, fewer buyers are concerned about rising house prices (22% this year compared with 31% in 2011) and even fewer are concerned about the impact of interest rates on their ability to purchase their first home (8% this year compared with 14% in 2011).
“While many of the economic indicators such as rate cuts, lower house prices and improved affordability might suggest now is a good time to buy, people are still nervous about their ability to sustain employment,” says Williamson.
</body></html>

First-home buyers increasingly ageing into their 30s and one in five even aged 40 and over: Mortgage Choice 

<html><body>
While it’s still early days, the latest housing finance figures published by both the ABS and mortgage broker AFG suggest NSW and Queensland are discouraging many first-home buyers after doubling state handouts last year, but only if they buy or build a new home, while offering nothing for those that buy an existing property.
The most up-to-date mortgage figures are provided by aggregator AFG, which claims to write one in every 10 home loans in Australia through its network of affiliated mortgage brokers.
AFG reports a healthy 15% rise in the volume of mortgages arranged by brokers over 2012 from $28 billion to $32 billion, but says the average long term share of home loans arranged for first-home buyers, usually between 12% and 15%, collapsed to just 4.2% in NSW and 4.5% in Queensland during the last two months of 2012, after the $7,000 first-home buyers grants were withdrawn in both states in favour of the $15,000 boost for new homes only.
In comparison, investors dominated the mortgage market in these two states, comprising 46.3% and 35.9% of all home loans respectively.
Official ABS data is only up until November, so it is difficult to say a trend is emerging, but the figures certainly suggest first-home buyers have not been swayed to consider a new house or apartment over an existing property.
The ABS records that the number of first-home buyer loans arranged in NSW fell from 2,088 in October to 1,383 November, while in Queensland first-home buyer loan numbers fell from 2,116 in October to 1,417 in November - in both states a monthly drop of 33%.
Furthermore, just 793 first-home buyers took advantage of the revised NSW first-home owners' grant in December last year, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/nsw-first-home-buyer-numbers-fell-to-20-year-lows-in-late-2012/2013011458763?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=news">the lowest take-up in 20 years</a> with the NSW state opposition claiming that Barry O'Farrell's decision to dump first-home buyer grants and stamp duty exemptions have been "nothing short of devastating for young people trying to buy their first home".
Indeed, first-home buyer changes are particularly tough on those in NSW that wish to buy an existing property.
Since October 1, the NSW state grant has been lifted from $7,000 to $15,000 for new homes valued up to $650,000, while a maximum stamp duty exemption of $20,240 is also available for new homes worth up to $550,000.<a style="font-size: 0.8em;" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/administrator/index.php?option=com_flexicontent&amp;view=item&amp;cid=58777#">Apply</a>
First-home buyers that purchase an existing home get nothing.
In Queensland, since September 11, a $15,000 first-home owner construction grant (FHOCG) has been available for new property bought or built at a value under $750,000, but all first-home buyers also pay no duty on purchases up to $500,000, with a phasing-out rebate applicable for values up to $600,000.
The doubling of the NSW first-home buyer grant was announced in mid-June, but only came into effect three-and-half months later, with Property Observer reporting on the conundrum it created for both <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/nsw-budgets-needlessly-complex-artificial-deadlines-have-short-term-and-long-term-consequences-for-residential-property/2012061455119">first-home buyers and investors</a> over this interim period.
Queensland government introduced its construction grant with immediate effect from September 11, but gave first-home buyers up until October 11 to finalise contracts.
Contrast this with Victoria, which still offers a $7,000 first-home buyer loan for both new and existing home purchases (and increased stamp duty concessions from 20% to 30% on January 1) and first-home buyer loan numbers were little changed over the month, falling marginally from 2,545 to 2,407.
Ray White chairman Brian White labelled the new first-home buyer polices as “no longer a first-home buyers but a builders incentive” and a "deceit", saying they distorted the market, but not in a healthy way.
The latest data suggests he could be right.
</body></html>

First-home buyer policies failing in NSW and Queensland

<html><body>
Five years ago, 30% of new dwellings constructed were units and townhouses. Since 2009, the market-share of attached dwellings has risen steadily, reaching 39% last year.
And the latest building approval figures suggest units now comprise 43% of new dwellings.
According to research from Bankwest, demand for medium-density housing has reached the highest level on record.
The Bankwest Housing Density Report revealed that 43% of new home approvals are medium-density dwellings. This is up from the 39% national average in the previous year.
Not surprisingly, capital cities account for 87% of medium-density approvals in the past 12 months. In five cities, units and townhouses comprised more than half of total dwelling approvals – including 68% in Sydney, Canberra and Darwin, as well as 55% in Melbourne and 53% in Brisbane.
Partly this is about affordability. In Sydney, the median unit price is $221,000 less than the median house price. In Melbourne the difference is $138,000, while in Darwin it’s $165,000.
But it’s more to do with lifestyle choices. Busy lives and the value people place on their leisure time points many buyers to a life-maintenance dwelling that doesn’t have gardens to weed and lawns to mow.
For those who want to be close to the inner city at a reasonable price, an apartment is the favoured option.
But buyers need to be careful. Several of our inner-city unit markets are over-supplied and it’s likely to get worse.
<blockquote>
But buyers need to be careful. Several of our inner-city unit markets are over-supplied and it’s likely to get worse.
</blockquote>
Melbourne already has huge vacancies (up to 10% in some near-city markets) and, according to PRDnationwide research, there are 88 large-scale unit projects under way or proposed.
Brisbane has high vacancies (6% in the CBD and approaching those levels in several inner-city suburbs) and has 69 large unit developments coming up. Perth has high vacancies as well, though the number of new projects in the pipeline is relatively small, with 13 new ones identified by PRDnationwide.
Sydney, to date, has not developed an over-supply and there are relatively few projects in the pipeline: 27 new ones under way or proposed.
It’s in Sydney that the trend towards medium-density living is most noticeable. Several of Sydney’s growth markets are apartment markets, including the inner-city areas Chippendale, Darlinghurst and Woolloomooloo - and the City of Canterbury, which includes suburbs such as Campsie, Lakemba and Roselands, where units are affordable.
Rising demand for apartments as a dwelling choice has also challenged the old paradigm that houses on land show better capital growth than units. Apartment markets are increasingly recording growth rates comparable to, and in some cases better than, houses.
But the surplus syndrome means buyers need to be choosy and do plenty of research into vacancy rates and building approval levels before committing.
</body></html>

Units continue to challenge houses as the dwelling of choice

<html><body>
For the first time in 35 years, a Hamilton Hill home in Brisbane is being offered up for auction this week, having last sold for $60,000 in 1979.
The property, <a href="https://www.eplace.com.au/property.cfm?propertyID=2536483&amp;realestate=24_Hillside_Crescent_Hamilton_QLD_4007" target="_blank">24 Hillside Crescent</a>, sits on 506 square metres with no sales prior to its last sale. The house, built in the mid-to-late 1930s by the Queensland timber merchant W.S. Brett was designed for the merchant himself. At the time, it was covered by The Courier-Mail as a significant property.
The three-bedroom, two-bathroom 80 year old home retains a number of its historical features, including leadlight awning doors, polished cedar timber floors and high decorative ceilings.
Marketing the home is Sherrie Storor of Place, who said that this was a rare opportunity.
“This house occupies an elevated position on Hamilton Hill and has a wide frontage with panoramic sweeps down both reaches of the Brisbane River and onto the city skyline,” said Storor.
“The home was designed to co-exist with its amazing position, with the floor plan oriented to take full advantage of the amazing Brisbane scenery from nearly every room.”
It has formal and informal living areas, patios, an in-ground Jacuzzi and a terrace.
It is looking for buyers who are open to restoring the home, with renovations required on the home.
“There is ample scope to renovate this home and restore its historic beauty while adding instant value,” she said.
There has already been substantial interest from buyers, and the expectation is for some fierce bidding later on today.
“We’re confident the property will sell – in fact, we are under instructions from the vendor that the property must be sold,” she said.
The auction will take place on Thursday at 6.30pm at the Place head office in East Brisbane.
RP Data's 'land value' section from June last year puts the price at $1,150,000.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Historic Brisbane, Hamilton Hill home up for auction

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The following comment echoes a dilemma of many potential first home buyers in Australia: 
“I am in late 20s, early 30s, $150,000 household income, $200,000 in savings - what should I do? Do I buy a property and risk my cash on an asset which is said to fall in value, or do I rent and invest my money into shares?”
The numbers may differ from person to person but the concern is the same.
I dealt with the issue of property prices in Australia and <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/australian-property-prices-in-2014-and-beyond-a-peek-into-the-future/2014013167457" target="_blank">what will happen in the future</a>, so instead I would like to focus on the issue of confidence.
If we analyse Australia's current economic situation objectively, we have a <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/a-roof-over-your-head-or-the-biggest-investment-you-ll-ever-make-how-should-we-treat-residential-property/2014020967655" target="_blank">six decades long history of strong growth in property prices</a>, historically low interest rates, a low unemployment level and an economic growth rate which is the envy of other developed nations. Also, it is relatively easier to finance property purchases nowadays than it was 20 years ago. In addition, there are ample examples of research demonstrating that residential property in Australia is <a href="https://www.asx.com.au/documents/resources/ASX_Report_2013.pdf" target="_blank">potentially the best investment class over the long-term</a>.
Yet, the fear of losing money, “because property prices are doomed to fall” and a pessimistic outlook are paralysing many to the extent that they are incapable of making a decision to buy a property.
Where does this fear come from? Why are we the biggest pessimists in the world despite surviving the global financial crisis quite well so far? We used to have severe recessions and other economic calamities before so, what’s different now? 
Let me digress for a moment and reflect on the “old times”, when things were viewed from another perspective.
How things used to be
Back then in the 1970s, 1980s or even 1990s, there was no talk about a possibility of property prices falling. The idea was to line up for a loan at the first opportunity and to get your first home as soon as you got your first full time job. It didn’t matter that the property had to be in a location on the city outskirts – you were buying what you could afford, and not your ultimate lifestyle.
The logic was that you pay your first property off as quickly as you can and then upgrade to something better and closer to city centre. Then do it again. And again. So that in the period of 15 to 20 years you could end up with something to enjoy for the rest of your life and which suited your lifestyle.
Your grandparents did it that way. Your parents did it that way. Everyone just followed the same routine. No questions asked. Everybody knew you cannot go wrong following this recipe.
I am generalising but it conveys the overall attitude of an older generation of Australians towards residential real estate. Now, let’s fast forward to present times.
How things are now
Parents and grandparents are no longer the role models and the primary source of wisdom. There is a new paradigm now.
Younger generations now take advice from media manufactured, faceless avatars and do-gooders on the Internet who create, either knowingly or unintentionally, the environment of fear, uncertainty and general misinformation.
This is not a criticism of a younger generation – quite the opposite. It is extremely difficult for anybody to make a decision with full confidence in such circumstances. The problem is more universal and relates to all generations living in present times. However, those of older age have those big decisions well and truly behind them while younger people have to face them now or in the near future.
The causes
It could be argued that it is the symptom of modern times that we are so overloaded with everyday tasks that are unable to find time to learn, discuss concepts and ideas with peers and elders we respect, analyse information and then make conscious decisions. Consequently, everything needs to be served on a plate for easy consumption where there is no need to exercise the brain too much.
As an example, we “do research” by skimming through news headlines and the more extreme and negative they are, the more attention they are likely to attract. We express our approval, opinions, or even protest, by clicking “Like”. And we tend to make only binary decisions: “Yes/No”, “Good/Bad”, etc. It seems there is very little time to ponder on “what if…” scenarios.
That is why media (traditional and social) and the internet in general have such a profound influence on what we think and do – they deliver snippets of information in chunks we are able to process without much effort.
The ease of dissemination of information in the digital age means there is a room for all sorts of views but what makes into a wider circulation is controversy and extreme cases.
So, we hear and read: “Property prices to fall 20%”, scratch that, 40% sounds more dramatic! But no one bothers to answer a fundamental question: "…and then what?"
Will they stay low or rebound? Is it likely that government would not intervene and would not try to prevent such a disaster? If there is intervention, what could be the impact on prices? Does this prediction have any merits after all?
It could be argued that there would be too much thinking involved to get these answers and in the fast paced digital media world there is no time for that because of editorial deadlines. The main game is headlines that attract the audience - not necessary the real story behind them.
And nobody bothers with putting caveats on such predictions either – by the following year the public will not remember “current scares” since focus will move onto the next extreme set of predictions.
A big part of the problem is how we interpret information published in the media – instead of treating those claims as a starting point for further investigation we tend to jump to a quick conclusion: “I saw it on TV so it must be right.”
<blockquote>
It is rather rare that a balanced and objective view of the state of affairs reaches wider audience via popular media channels – there is no incentive to publish such information simply because there is nothing sensational about it.
</blockquote>
Therefore, we are probably as much to blame for what is happening as the media. That is, we do not demand in-depth analysis behind the story simply because we don’t have the time to digest it. We just assume that someone must have done it diligently to come up with the conclusion, so the headlines will do just fine.
It is rather rare that a balanced and objective view of the state of affairs reaches wider audience via popular media channels – there is no incentive to publish such information simply because there is nothing sensational about it. Balanced views simply do not attract enough audience.
The effect is that only simplistic, negative, very often contentious, views propagate - leading to a widespread misinformation, like: “Property prices will fall in Australia because they have fallen everywhere else”; “We have affordability crisis because of negative gearing and speculators”; “Foreigners are causing property prices to rise”. There are a tonne of those around.
It should therefore come as no surprise that a significant proportion of would be buyers is put off making a decision.
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Some unexpected consequences
There is a number of quite ironic consequences resulting from all that doom, gloom and misinformation about the property market in Australia.
Firstly, it makes us vulnerable to exploitation by unscrupulous spruikers. In particular, on one hand it all leads to a perception that “property ownership is a dumb idea” (whether for living in it or earning income from it), that “everybody is losing money” and “everything is going to collapse very shortly anyway”.
On the other, it creates a fertile ground for those who claim to have a “secret formula” to “make it all magically work for us” and “to make the taxman pay for everything” - if we only spend $10,000 on a seminar and instructional videos, and some more on personal coaching.
There are plenty of people who fall for a magic of big numbers and a prospect of becoming a property mogul - despite the fact that there are no secrets to making money with property, just clever marketing.
The second consequence is that it led to emergence of new industries with a sole purpose of helping people to buy into property – from online discussion forums, dedicated blogs and property search portals profiting from advertising, through those selling specialised reports, smartphone apps, DIY property investment books and seminars, to buyer advocates and mortgage brokers offering information, tools and services for a fee. And now even financial advisers are getting on-board with advice on investment in property via self-managed superannuation funds.
<blockquote>
The overload of information and assistance, rather than helping in making decisions, has a totally opposite consequence – that is, more information tends to paralyse us rather than aid in making those hard decisions.
</blockquote>
Yet, it seems that, for many, it is harder than ever to make a decision. The overload of information and assistance, rather than helping in making decisions, has a totally opposite consequence – that is, more information tends to paralyse us rather than aid in making those hard decisions.
Not to mention that everybody demands a fair compensation for their work so, that assistance can add quite substantially to the overall cost of buying, making us even more apprehensive about making the decision.
Not many of these services existed 20 odd years ago and information was not so easy accessible either. So, the bulk of advice and assistance was coming from parents, relatives and your local bank manager – all for free.
The trust that young people had in older generations is no longer as strong for the current generation of young people. Maybe this is also due to the fact that the elders also have become confused and no longer have as strong a conviction about the merits of purchasing a property as they used to have in the past.
This is unfortunate because that trust was crucial in providing moral and emotional support for young people getting into debt for the first time. And it helped to positively reinforce the decision.
The perception that nothing can go wrong because “everybody is doing it this way”, created by decades of success stories by people they knew personally, was also very empowering.
In other words, it appears that the whole support structure that helped in making tough decisions is significantly weakened, if not entirely collapsed. There is really nobody that can be trusted anymore since those who offer assistance are there only to gain something from us (i.e. either clicks, patronage or real money for a service). The notion of “impartial advice” is somehow compromised in those circumstances as one can never be certain of true intentions behind provided information and advice. We are really on our own with those big decisions.
Social considerations that cannot be ignored
Then there are also social pressures impacting on the decision whether to buy a property or not. In the 21st century fun, globetrotting, gadgets, extreme sports, celebrity status, etc. “symbols of good and joyful life” are valued much higher than debt on a property located somewhere on the city's outskirts. Committing to owning a property early in life would mean sacrifices (i.e. less of the fun things) and would undermine rather than enhance the status of individuals in the eyes of their peers. So, at young age the choice is easy – don’t buy.
By the time people are ready to settle and start a family (which happens much later in life than in the past) they have already got used to the convenience of living in the city but they are overwhelmed by the amount of money required to continue that lifestyle as a family unit (either renting or buying, which requires taking on a substantial debt). This is when the anxiety about the future really kicks in.
The fact that Australia has not really experience economic hardship since early 1990s means that many of younger people also do not know what to expect when the hard times do come, adding to the anxiety and multiplying the fear factor (ie. because of the unknown).
This is a point in life when headlines like “property prices are overvalued by 40%” or “there is housing affordability crisis in Australia” are becoming a drawcard for this demographic group because it helps them to cope with the anxiety by reinforcing the fact they are not alone in this predicament.
However, these are not the real reasons why they are unable to buy - it is all primarily about the mindset.
A simple solution
The reality is that things are never black and white as they are over-simplified by media for the purpose of easy consumption. What we mostly hear in the media are opinions and not indisputable facts based on evidence – even those expressed by experts.
So, this fear is not substantiated with a valid reason. It is just a consequence of not knowing what to believe in, as well as not having the adequate knowledge to objectively assess what others are purporting to be the “ultimate truth”.
The only way to overcome this paralysis it is to get to know the facts. And this requires making the effort of starting to think for yourself.
The bottom line is that one cannot outsource thinking because there is a big price to pay at a later date. 
End note
I did use many generalisations in this article to emphasise the important issues underpinning the problem but, of course, there are many exceptions, as current property sales statistics show. There are many first home buyers that are making the decision to buy right now.
It all boils down to a mental state of having a confidence in the decision you make. It requires knowledge and conviction that this knowledge is not tainted.
It takes effort and lots of thinking before you can get into that mental state. So, taking time to think should be as important as attending the gym or undertaking other routine activities of your daily life. Sorting out finances to buy a property is the easy part.
There are no right or wrong decisions. However, since there are consequences of each decision, there will be those decisions that one can live with and those that will be regretted until the end of one’s life.
The key is to be mentally prepared to bear those unpleasant consequences when you make a decision which produces an outcome that is not in your favour.
This is the only secret one really needs to know to make a decision whether to buy or not to buy a property at present time. Affordability has nothing to do with it - it is all about the confidence.
Arek Drozda is an independent analyst who has worked in the public and private sectors for over 20 years in business development, data analysis and in building geographic information systems.
</body></html>

adrozda-Nq9GwoWWBW

Crisis of confidence or crisis of affordability?

<html><body>
I was fortunate enough to attend the SQM seminar last week as Louis Christopher – one of the most well respected voices in the real estate industry for his balanced assessment of market data – presented a state by state rundown of projected activity over 2014.
<a target="_blank" href="#https://www.sqmresearch.com.au/capitalcitiesreports.php">Louis predicts</a> Sydney’s established housing market will see a 15-20% ‘rapid rise’ over the course of 2014, highlighting the middle suburbs in particular to capture the overflow of demand, as inner city development constraints force consumers outwards.  
There’s been plenty of talk regarding housing affordability and the very real risk associated with an unsustainable boom in values, with some claiming – based in part on our low interest rate environment – that any mention of a concern is a mere myth.  
When asked from an audience member at the seminar if first home buyers were being crowded out of Sydney, Louis concluded they were – and indeed it would be hard to deny.  
Investor activity has dominated the Australian property market over the last 12 months or so.  Banks are bidding for buyers in a highly competitive environment, and the lion’s share of mortgage demand is being eaten up between investors and upgraders.  
A third of all new loans are with loan to value ratios of more than 80%, and 40% are on interest only terms.  Clearly investors are speculating on a continued pattern of price gains from an already high plateau – an ambitious projection.  
Under the existing financial system, inevitably, it’s none other than rising debt that fuels accelerated growth.  However, <a target="_blank" href="#https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/09/charting-the-australian-first-home-buyer-retreat/">since March 2009</a>, whilst the average first homebuyer mortgage has increased by only 1.4%, the mortgage for the market as a whole has grown by 7.9%.  
Meanwhile, first home buyers have seen their savings eroded, and as the latest ABS housing finance data outlines, wishful thinking that rising yields are pushing greater numbers into the market, has had scant effect.  
According to research by <a target="_blank" href="https://www.ratecity.com.au/">Rate City</a>, “first home buyers now account for just 11% of home loan commitments. This is below the 20 year average of 15% and has not been this low since 2004.” And whilst interest rates on their own can have little impact on price rises or falls in the near term – a long period of low rates and the dependency it invokes, can be dangerous in inelastic areas of limited supply.  
Current competition coupled with pent up demand, has done little more than push values further out of reach of a genuine entry buyer demographic.  And as complex as it may be to slowly unpick the current distortions that tie up the established market and hamper construction, the implications of not doing so, are potentially worst over the longer term.  
No one should be fooled by the rhetoric from various industry commentators concluding current inflationary gains are of no concern. Hence why we are seeing a conundrum in central banks across the globe employing "precautionary policy activism” in an attempt to cool asset inflation without hampering the broader economy by raising rates.  
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/new-zealand-rba-announces-restrictions-on-mortgage-lending-for-borrowers-with-less-than-a-20-deposit/2013082064388">In New Zealand in particular it’s a point of concern</a> and not just a localised issue. House prices currently sit at record highs, with the government property valuer ‘QV’ residential index showing gains of 8.5% in the 12-month period ending August 30.  
As reporter for real estate news on Sky Business 602, Iggy Damiani pointed out to me last week that Australian banks' ownership of New Zealand’s 'big four', place them in a precarious position - currently having the highest exposure to residential mortgages in the world. Therefore asset gains, which outpace both wage growth and inflation, must be addressed.  
Even assuming low rates are assisting first home buyers, saving a deposit and sourcing a suitably affordable property is no easy task for a demographic who are often burdened with a hangover of student debt, and, in many cases, can’t conceivably buy in until they partner with a second income earner.  
With this in mind, it must be pondered what the effect will be when rates do inevitably rise, considering our household debt to income ratio remains stubbornly high, at around 148%.  
Property to some extent connects together like a flowchart. Supply is fed in from the bottom to allow those upgrading (and then downsizing) a ready market to sell into in order to make the move.  
However, when investors predominantly negatively gear into the asset class most favoured by first home buyers – inevitably resulting in inflated established property values – and the state government fails to come to the party with feasible affordable alternatives, our property wheel of upgrading and downsizing risks stagnation.  
In the near term, heated investor activity may keep everyone dancing, however over the longer term we’re losing a valuable demographic of property buyer, which will no doubt have a flow-on effect across the property chain as a whole.  
As these changes push through the generation gap, it’s fair to assess, increasing numbers will retire whist still factoring as short-term renters.  
Investors tend to hold property for extended periods of time in order to build equity – many choose to invest as part of their self-managed super funds and subsequently do not sell until retirement. Therefore the ready supply, which usually comes from initial homebuyers selling and upgrading, will start to slow.  
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Additionally, we have the first world problem of an aging population creating future headwinds across the economy, with <a target="_blank" href="https://archive.treasury.gov.au/igr/igr2010/report/pdf/IGR_2010.pdf">government intergenerational reports</a> forecasting the already reducing workforce participation rate, to drop to around 60% by 2050.  
Considering the predominant home buying activity takes place within the ages of 22-44, it seems reasonable to assume that there’ll eventually be proportionally greater demand from those downsizing as we progress through these buyer type changes.  
However, if the flow-on home buyer effect doesn’t follow through, the mismatch of household size comparable to property type will continue to stagnate our property buying and selling terrain, further tying down supply in the areas most want and need to reside – areas within easy commutable distance to city suburbs, jobs and essential amenities such as schools, hospitals, doctors, public transport systems and so forth.  
Therefore, the last thing we should be doing, is advocating the spruik that rising property prices are somehow good for the economy having a supposed flow on effect into retail spending, which in itself is currently not producing the desired result.  First home buyers may head out to purchase white goods and furniture for their new abode, but our investment sector certainly won’t.  
Additionally, choices are limited in a market that has been turned into a speculative terrain.  
If we were building homes that were viable for first home buyers to gain a foothold which would not only maintain consistent market demand in order to upgrade, but also provide feasible accommodation for this demographic to settle for an adequate period of time, then having an investor-dominated inner-city terrain could perhaps be balanced somewhat so as not to affect the stagnated flow of the home buyer chain.  
However, the new home options are either limited to outer-suburban estates lacking in infrastructure, which is an essential component needed at the start of each project if we’re to lure home buyers outwards, or alternatively, inner-city high-density low grade developments.  
Our census data already demonstrates that most lone person households are tottering around in accommodation that’s far too big for their requirements. Building an abundance of one-bedroom apartments therefore won’t suffice; only 14% of the total single person households of all ages opt for one-bedroom units.  We instead need a wider diversity of options, in particular, accommodation suited to families - with the decrease of ownership for this demographic showing a fall from 79.5% in 2006 to 77.2% in 2011.  
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/why-investor-activity-is-causing-our-property-markets-to-stagnate-catherine-cashmore/2013021759370">As I’ve mentioned previously</a>, the percentage of investor-owned apartments in both Darwin and Brisbane falls close to 70% – and in the other capitals, it comes in between 60 and 70%.  
And whilst this generation of existing investors may continue to enjoy short-term speculative gains of the oft quoted property cycle, since when did the future of the first home buyer market become ours to erode?  
I’ve assisted numerous first home buyers and renters over the past few years, and it’s no exaggeration many perceive the capital price of property and the risks associated with taking on a greater proportion of debt a potential liability. For those who argue based on textbook analysis that property is not over priced, I suggest they change their frame of reference. There may be historical logic behind the long-term growth in values, but this doesn’t change the consequence; it is both over priced and under supplied.  
Therefore, pressure on the rental market is unlikely to ease in the near to far future, with ABS data showing almost two-thirds of new residents from overseas are long-term property renters along with half new residents from within Australia who also class themselves within the same bracket.  
Furthermore, economic conditions such as wage growth, unemployment, consumer confidence and frequent changes of work placements all reduce the likelihood of a strengthening owner-occupier market over the next decade.  
Current policy is built around the general assumption that renting is a step on the road to ownership. However, unless the trend takes an about turn, tomorrow’s generation will hold a growing percentage of residents for which renting is for life, and as such, we also need to consider their welfare.  
Policy should be steered towards the creation of a fairer partnership between owner and renter.  This would include longer terms of tenancy, protection from exorbitant rent rises coupled with enforcement of basic standards of accommodation in both the private and public sector.  
As it stands, in the rental market, and the property buying/selling market short termism dominates.  No surprise, as we’re governed by those who derive personal and political benefit from the existing system, polling for the popular vote from home owners and investors; pinned to our flawed debt based financial system that relies on an ever inflating future to under-pin existing gains.  
 
<hr>
 Catherine Cashmore is a market analyst with extensive experience in all aspects relating to property acquisition.
 
     
</body></html>

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Latest Investing Insights

Safari Group offers low-touch investment proposition in Queenstown’s popular ski fields district

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News