<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Combined capital city home values went up 9.8% in the 2014-15 financial year, with Sydney having the strongest capital growth followed by Melbourne.
The latest CoreLogic RP Data Home Value Index found combined capital city home values increased by 43.1% between December 2008 and June 2015.
CoreLogic RP Data researcher Cameron Kusher said since the end of 2008, value growth in Sydney and Melbourne has stood head and shoulders above all other cities.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/rp.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/rp.jpg" alt="">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
“Over the past three years we’ve seen further growth in home values on the back of a renewed interest rate cutting cycle," Mr Kusher said.
"Since the financial crisis we’ve seen residential unit construction surge to record high levels… despite more units being built, most buyers still show a preference for a detached house.
"As a result of this trend, Sydney and Melbourne are the strongest housing markets for capital growth and we expect this to continue over the coming financial year.” 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%203.18.23%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%203.18.23%20PM.png" alt="">
 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Capital city home values up 9.8% in FY15: CoreLogic RP Data

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Despite a long history of research into poverty, no consensus yet exists on what constitutes being “poor” or “disadvantaged”. Measures of household wealth don’t go far enough in identifying those most at risk of being excluded from society. Nor do such measures explain the level of exclusion they face.
Significant numbers of people are at risk, however. Our research suggests that more than one in two people with a disability or long-term health condition and nearly half of people aged 65 and above experienced social exclusion in 2012.
A better way to measure poverty?
Monitoring changes in the prevalence and characteristics of poverty is crucial to keeping track of whether a society is really successful in tackling this problem. Traditional measurements have too narrowly focused on incomes and whether households can afford a minimum acceptable standard of living.
Broader concepts have emerged more recently. These recognise that socioeconomic disadvantage is much more complex. One more useful method is the concept of “social exclusion”.
The measure, which first emerged in Europe, encompasses not only income and other economic resources, but also dimensions of disadvantage – such as health and education – that determine individuals' ability to participate fully in society.
The <a href="https://www.bsl.org.au/research-and-publications/social-exclusion-monitor/" target="_blank">Social Exclusion Monitor</a>, developed by the Brotherhood of St Laurence and the University of Melbourne, has proven useful in Australia to measure the extent and evolution of a wider notion of poverty and disadvantage.
In contrast with income-based poverty measures, the monitor measures the accumulation of deprivation across seven life domains: material resources, employment, education and skills, health and disability, social connection, community and personal safety.
Considering a total of 29 indicators across these domains, it uses data from the national Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (<a href="https://www.melbourneinstitute.com/hilda/" target="_blank">HILDA</a>) survey. Since 2001, this survey has annually collected detailed socioeconomic data for a nationally representative sample of the population. This allows the monitor to study social exclusion since the beginning of the 21st century.
The latest issue of the Social Exclusion Monitor bulletin provides revealing insights into the nature and characteristics of disadvantage.
For 2012, the most recent wave of HILDA data, around 25% of Australians aged 15 years or above experienced some level of social exclusion: 20% were marginally excluded, 5% deeply excluded and almost 1% very deeply excluded.
This means that about 825,000 Australians experienced deep exclusion and more than 150,000 people were very deeply excluded.
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/image-20150721-24261-1kp0r3v.jpeg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/image-20150721-24261-1kp0r3v.jpeg" alt=""> 
Social exclusion worse for some
The monitor also provides valuable insights into trends over time. Overall, the impact of the 2008 global financial crisis was more limited in Australia than in many countries, but it marked a turning point in terms of social exclusion.
From 2001, the prevalence of exclusion steadily declined to reach a low point for the period in 2008. The decline in unemployment and the rate of jobless households, measured by the monitor’s employment domain as well as the fall in the proportion of people with a low level of education, contributed to the reduction in the number of excluded.
However, following the global financial crisis, the prevalence of marginal exclusion started to grow. It has remained above pre-crisis levels since then.
The Social Exclusion Monitor bulletin shows the risk of social exclusion is not the same for everybody. The demographic groups most likely to experience exclusion are people aged 65 and above – almost half experienced it in 2012 – and people with long-term health conditions or a disability – more than half experienced it.
The risk of exclusion also varies with the level of education. The prevalence of social exclusion among those with less than Year 12 is more than 2.5 times higher than among those with more education.
The type of households individuals live in also influences the risk of exclusion. Single parents and people living alone experience exclusion at higher rates than other families. Public housing tenants have higher rates of exclusion than those in other forms of housing.
There is also a gender gap. Women are more excluded than men in all age groups, overall by more than five percentage points. The difference is larger among people aged over 55.
The most prevalent indicators of exclusion are low education, long-term health conditions or disabilities and low wealth – each is experienced by at least 20% of people. These are the key to understanding social exclusion in Australia.
The sources of exclusion do vary over the life cycle, however. Education and employment are the main drivers of exclusion for those under 25, accounting for more than half of the exclusion of this age group. In contrast, economic resources, health and community engagement make the largest contribution to the exclusion of people aged 65 and above.
Unsurprisingly, some socioeconomic groups are more likely to experience persistent social exclusion than others. Analysis of the longitudinal information in the HILDA survey shows that older Australians, people living in highly disadvantaged areas as measured by the Socioeconomic Indexes for Areas, long-term unemployed and households with members who are jobless or have a disability are more likely to experience persistent exclusion.
The reason is twofold. People in these groups are both less likely to move out of poverty and, if they have managed to improve their circumstances, more likely to fall back into it.
This data reveals few surprises. The findings tell a familiar and consistent story about who is and isn’t excluded in Australia. However, the analysis of the sources of exclusion at different points in the life cycle and the findings in relation to persistent exclusion are especially important for developing polices to reduce social exclusion.
These findings underline the need to focus our policies and services on the places and groups where social exclusion is concentrated. We need to redouble our efforts to keep young people in education while also assisting them, and the long-term jobless, to find and retain employment.
We must ensure that older people with chronic health conditions and those with a disability are able to participate in the community while also addressing their health needs.
And if we were really smart we would invest in early intervention among these groups to prevent persistent social exclusion.
 
Francisco Azipitarte is Ronald Henderson research fellow, University of Melbourne and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/francisco-azipitarte-92300" target="_blank">here</a>.
Shelley Mallett is professorial fellow at the University of Melbourne and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/shelley-mallett-129018" target="_blank">here</a>.
Both are authors published in The Conversation.
</body></html>

Who’s on the outer? Uncovering poverty’s many faces

<html><body>
Continued growth in the Sydney market is being felt across the entire market however buyers are now becoming picky.
Conversion rates on Sydney property have increased from one in five visitors to a display centre to one in seven or eight according to CBRE managing director, residential projects, David Milton.
Presenting at a recent CBRE Sydney Market Outlook breakfast which reviewed the outlook for the office, retail, industrial and residential sectors for Australia and the broader Asia Pacific, Mr Milton said sales hadn’t slowed overall, with total sales 11% higher in the first half of 2015 relative to the corresponding period in 2014.  
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.13.43%20PM.png" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.13.43%20PM.png" alt="" width="820" height="450">
 
"Buyer enquiry rates were 29% higher in the first half of 2015, underpinned by a pick-up in offshore buying, with 19% of sales in the first half requiring FIRB approval as opposed to 13% in 2014," Mr Milton said.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.17.32%20PM.png" target="_blank"> Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.17.32%20PM.png" alt="" width="816" height="408">
The presentation also highlighed:
<div class="page" title="Page 45">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li>
19% of sales from Jan to June 2015 were from FIRB purchasers, as compared to 13% in 2014 
</li>
<li>
Enquiries from Jan to June 2015 were 65k - an increase of 29% on the same period in 2014 
</li>
<li>
In 2015 owner occupiers have accounted for 50% of purchasers, up from 40% in 2014 
</li>
<li>Sales numbers from Jan to June 2015 were up 11% on the same period in 2014 </li>
</ul>
Is Sydney is attracting new business as an investment destination?
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.28.08%20PM.png" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.28.08%20PM.png" alt="" width="696" height="371">
 
OFFICE RENTAL MARKET
Adapting to a change in the marketplace was key to attracting iss the key for landlords given that “change is the new business as usual”, according to CBRE’s national director of transaction management Emil Joubert. 
Mr Joubert said tenants were increasingly examining their lease expiries well ahead of time – with some tenants whose leases expired in 2020/21 already examining if now was the right time to consider a move given the current vacancy forecasts.
CBRE senior director of office services, Jenine Cranston, said landlords need to consider flexibility to accommodate growth from tenants.
“In 20 Martin Place, the major tenants we’re speaking to all want growth rights,” Ms Cranston said. 
“It’s been a long time since we’ve seen that. For seven years, the discussions have mostly been around contraction, so this is a nice challenge for the market to have.”
Incubator IT companies needing short term space for six month growth was different to the usual tenant growth expectations of  18 months to two years.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.33.09%20PM.png">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.33.09%20PM.png" alt="" width="623" height="258">
 
Office yields are set to move higher in 2017
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.36.29%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.36.29%20PM.png" alt="" width="692" height="333"> 
CBRE’s head of research Australia, Stephen McNabb said that while most Australian office markets still favored tenants, a tighter vacancy outlook in Sydney was driving an improvement in face rents, with incentives having stabilised.
Mr McNabb noted that CBRE’s forecast for the Sydney CBD was for a below average 7% vacancy rate over the next 3-5 years, supported by a number of factors, including the withdrawal of office stock for residential redevelopment.
“We have seen rent growth in Sydney in the first half, which we haven’t observed for a long time,” Mr McNabb said.
This was one of the factors that meant Sydney was better place to withstand the office yield compression anticipated in some other Asia Pacific markets.
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.42.06%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.42.06%20PM.png" alt="" width="859" height="390">
"In the rental market, Australia was benefiting from a continued influx of foreign entrants, with 40 new store openings last year by new or expanding retailers and a further 12 openings in the first half of 2015.
"This was helping to drive CBD rental growth, with Sydney CBD rents having increased by 20% in the past 12 months and rental growth having also been recorded in the shopping centre sector."
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.28.08%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.28.08%20PM.png" alt="" width="735" height="392">
 
CBRE NSW state director, industrial and logistics services, Mike O'Neill, said Sydney leasing activity was up by 61% this year, relative to the corresponding period in 2014.
"Low supply would help drive Sydney rental growth with the new wave of speculative development not expected until next year," Mr McNeill said
"Another driver would be residential encroachments, in addition to factors such as the recent hailstorms, which had displaced a range of tenants and soaked up a considerable amount of vacant stock."
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.51.15%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%201.51.15%20PM.png" alt="" width="761" height="521">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

National property market outlook wrap: CBRE

<html><body>
The ABS quarterly survey “Building Activity” provides detail on the non-residential building sector. Here we reassess conditions and prospects for the sector, with a greater focus on the private segment, which accounts for 78% of activity. Hereafter ‘building’ refers to ‘non-residential building’.
In summary, the strengthening of private building activity in recent years will be punctuated in 2015 by a relatively modest downturn. Approvals took a step lower in 2014, but have stabilised more recently, with falls in offices, retail and industrial, following a wave of projects and against the backdrop of mixed domestic demand conditions. The looming near-term slowing of building activity will be uneven, with declines greater in the mining states of WA and Qld, where the spill-over effects of the mining investment downturn will be most felt.
Activity: Total building activity advanced by 1.3% in the March quarter, to be 0.7% above the level of a year ago.
Private building activity has been in an upward trend for four years, with gains as follows: +9.9%yr in March 2012; +2.7%yr in March 2013; +3.8% in March 2014; and +9.6%yr in March 2015.
In the March quarter, private work expanded by 3.5%. This rise was supported by the sizeable work pipeline and was despite the recent softening of commencements. Activity is unlikely to be sustained at the current $6.9bn per quarter, which is 12% above the level of commencements.
Public works have eased back to more normal levels in the aftermath of the Federal Government’s 2009/10 fiscal stimulus package. In the March quarter, public works declined by 5.5% to be 22% lower than a year ago.
Total commencements were valued at $7.4bn in the March quarter, continuing the softer tone evident since the second half of 2014.
Private commencements were $6.1bn in the quarter. If there is a similar outcome in the June quarter, then commencements for the 2014/15 financial year will be down 16% on 2013/14. That is broadly in line with the weakening of approvals, which in the six months to May 2015 were 18% lower than at the start of 2014. 
The sizeable pipeline of work outstanding is being gradually reduced. For the private sector, the pipeline declined by $1bn over the past year, to $18.3bn, as work progressed on office, retail, health and industrial projects - partially offset by a lift in the pipeline for social infrastructure, such as entertainment. 
The pipeline of work for public works is currently $4.9bn, down from $6.6bn a year ago.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%2012.47.12%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%2012.47.12%20PM.png" alt="" width="800" height="603">
 
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%2012.49.04%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%2012.49.04%20PM.png" alt="">
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Andrew Hanlan is senior economist for Westpac and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://au.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hanlan/3/222/430" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Australia's non-residential building sector 2015 Q1: Andrew Hanlan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Hopes for root-and-branch internal reform of the federal Labor Party at its national conference look set to be dashed. The draft organisational reform agenda, published ahead of this weekend’s conference, signals that wholesale democratisation of the party’s decision-making structures may not happen.
Expectations had been building for more than a year that the national conference would deliver deep organisational reform. This belief was sparked in April 2014. Bill Shorten, who won the leadership of the federal Labor Party in its first election to involve rank-and-file members, set down his vision for a “modern, outward-looking, confident and democratic party” in his <a href="https://billshorten.com.au/towards-modern-labor-party" target="_blank">“Towards a Modern Labor”</a> speech.
Shorten called for:
<ul>
<li>
a reduction in the structural power of the union in party matters;
</li>
<li>
increased membership involvement in preselections for the lower house (70:30 split between local members and a central panel) and for the Senate (50:50 split);
</li>
<li>
increased female representation across all party domains; and
</li>
<li>
direct election of delegates to national conference.
</li>
</ul>
However, not all of the bold initiatives that Shorten laid down in 2014 appear on the draft agenda. Conspicuously absent from the document are commitments to enshrine the new rules for selecting the leader in the national party constitution, and significant reform of preselection.
Many of the agenda items are less radical proposals to introduce online policy branches and consider new types of local branches. These sit alongside the usual calls to increase the membership, encourage union members to become active party members, and foster greater engagement by the parliamentary party with the rank and file.
There are also reforms that could be construed as increasing the centralisation and consolidation of power in the hands of party elites. The proposal to require state campaign directors to consult the leader and the national campaign director before the selection of candidates in both targeted and safe Labor seats is a case in point.
The draft statement also “supports state branches that are considering direct election”. Significantly, it proposes an implementation committee be established to further explore the direct election of national conference delegates. While this could ultimately result in reform, it is just as likely to postpone change in the short term.
Why such a tentative agenda?
Three key factors can explain the reforms being put forward.
First, while Shorten is federal parliamentary party leader, he does not have the power to change the rules unilaterally. A majority of national conference delegates must approve the changes.
Second, as a decision-making forum, the conference is not naturally suited to deep, system-wide organisational reform. Achieving agreement among 400 delegates on comprehensive organisational reforms is a logistical feat, especially when no faction has a majority of delegates capable of mobilising the numbers.
It is complicated further because the conference also seeks to tackle contentious matters of policy and platform, such as climate change, same-sex marriage, the treatment of refugees and the recognition of Palestine. The national conference has many issues to deal with, and only three days to do so.
Third, although Shorten is in a unique position to argue for the reforms as party leader, he would need to expend significant political capital on this. Given the possibility the Abbott government will call an early election, and Labor being ahead in the polls, Shorten may be reluctant to allow the party to become embroiled in contentious debates, which may evoke memories of the divisive Rudd-Gillard era.
Does it matter if internal reform is not achieved?
The presumption is that failing to achieve substantive outcomes will consign the ALP to political and electoral irrelevance, and Shorten’s leadership to oblivion. Both are dramatic overstatements.
For a start, although Gough Whitlam’s efforts to reform Labor’s organisational structures are widely lauded, few recent Labor leaders have systematically pursued – let alone secured – major organisational change. Leaving aside Kevin Rudd’s move to have rank-and-file involvement in electing the party leader in the dying days of the last Labor government, Simon Crean has been the only federal leader to achieve major reform in recent times.
And although political commentators are deeply engaged in the issue of organisational reform, it is rarely a vote-winning issue.
Elections are usually decided by public policy issues, leadership and government performance – not by matters of internal party reform. Both the ALP (2007) and the Liberals (2013) were able to win office while largely failing to act on the major reforms recommended by internal party organisational reviews.
However, there are signs that momentum for organisational reform is gathering pace.
Senior party figures such as former senator John Faulkner and ex-Victorian premier Steve Bracks have renewed their calls for change. They have been joined by former union bosses, such as Greg Combet and Bill Kelty, in calling for structural and cultural change. Within the party, newly formed ginger groups such as Open Labor are calling for party democratisation.
It would be a mistake, then, to view the national conference as a failure if comprehensive organisational reform is not achieved. The short-term importance of reform to Labor’s electoral fortunes and Shorten’s leadership has generally been exaggerated. However, the pressure to change is unlikely to dissipate.
Narelle Miragliotta is senior lecturer in Australian Politics at Monash University and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/narelle-miragliotta-3372" target="_blank">here</a>.
Nicholas Barry is lecturer, faculty of humanities and social sciences at La Trobe University and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/nicholas-barry-13539" target="_blank">here</a>. Both are authors on The Conversation.
</body></html>

Longing for Labor to reform itself? National conference may not provide

<html><body>
Employees have become an inevitable part of company image. But when employers make judgements and hire on the basis of attracting the “right” kind of people, they leave themselves open to charges of discrimination.
US clothing retailer Abercrombie &amp; Fitch found this out the hard way. It was recently ruled against in a long running court case brought by a young Muslim woman who was denied a job at the retailer because she wore a headscarf.
Abercrombie &amp; Fitch has since replaced its infamous “look policy” which banned caps and black clothing and sought people with a “preppy style”, with a new dress code it says allows customer service staff to be “more individualistic”. It has also changed its hiring practices to not consider attractiveness. Store staff, previously referred to as “models” by the company are now “brand representatives”.
Closer to home, fitness retailer Lorna Jane recently raised the ire of some Australians by advertising for a “Receptionist/Fit Model<a href="https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/fashion/lorna-jane-receptionist-and-model-job-ad-includes-physical-measurements/story-fnjev30n-1227430876631">”</a>, outlining specific body size requirements. It later clarified that it had decided to combine a traditional back-office role with a front office one so that the successful applicant could “liaise directly with customers on a day-to-day basis, receive their feedback and allow Lorna Jane to deliver an even better product to benefit our customers and their active lifestyles”.
Beyond the ‘right attitude’
In a recent study we set out to find how customer perceptions were impacted by the appearance of customer service staff. We investigated the increasing importance of having employees with not only the “right” attitudes, but also “right look” and “right sound” in service encounters in the apparel retail sector.
The qualitative study included a sample of customers of leading Australian fashion retailers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 51 customers. Half of the sample were female and the average age of the customers was 29 (the youngest being 18 and the oldest 61).
‘Matching’ and ‘mirroring’ effects
We found customers tend to approach store staff that look similar to them. They also prefer to approach staff of their own age and same gender for help or ask questions associated with fashion. In some cases, customers whose English is not their first language also prefer staff who can speak their native language.
“I am an Asian, and it is quite clear that my friends and I do prefer to be served by someone from our country. Especially, for some of people, whom I know of, who are not comfortable with speaking English… Yes, this goes for both men and women.”
“As a Muslim woman, I would like to talk to a female staff rather than a male. I prefer to talk to someone who come from or look like they are from the same country as me. … Yet, I do not like to talk to a man.”
Customers are more inclined to “match” or “mirror” their age, gender, race and ethnicity with customer service staff in more involved buying situations than in simple and less risky occasions, such as trying to locate a product in store.
While not extensively investigated in the service encounter literature, the concept of “mirroring” has been established in many other domains such as psychology. As such, it is not a completely new idea. This “mirroring” impact has been explained in social identity theory as a person often puts greater value on “in-group” members who have shared characteristics.
Customers also use age and gender as a non-verbal cue in a “matching” process to decide if a staff member can offer trustworthy advice. In other words, customers attempt to “match” the age and/or gender of a frontline employee with their expectations of what a person with expertise should look like.
Many customers claim that the good appearance of the sales assistant and the managers helps them to hold back their anger in response to service failure at a certain level.
“I don’t know why, … . But I will try to hold my anger when I see a good looking sales assistant.”
“I will be more polite with an older person. … Yes, I will be less polite and straight forward to a younger person.”
They also admit that at some point in time they are willing to visit the store again because of the appearance of the customer service staff.
“My friend and I always come back to this section because of the sales person - he is very cute… Well, most of the time we just come to look for the guy… We sometimes buy clothes in that section too.”
“Yes, I used to go back to a shop just to see someone… But not anymore though, that when I was much younger.”
Gender in service encounters
Our study also found that many gay men would be happier to interact with another gay service employee. However, staff handsomeness did not impact on the gay customers’ decision to approach the staff for advice. Nevertheless, some gay men said they prefer to simply see rather than talk to good-looking staff.
“I only like looking at a cute guy… I guess I am just too shy to talk. But you know, this is part of window shopping… ha ha ha.”
“It does not matter if they are handsome or not. I find them the same.”
Some lesbian customers said the gender of the sales staff had minor to no impact on their decision to approach someone for advice.
“I am happy to get help from anyone … man, woman, lesbian or gay … I am happy with any of them. … At the same time, I am expecting them to treat everybody equally.”
“Personally, I would prefer to talk to women, but I also do not mind talking to men.”
In short, the visible diversity of staff influences customers in a service encounter and, depending on the purchase occasions, customers prefer to, for example, interact with older/younger or male/female staff. In general, having staff who share the same appearance as customers may deliver a competitive advantage to retailers.
Park Thaichon is assistant professor of marketing at S P Jain School of Global Management and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/park-thaichon-175182" target="_blank">here</a>.
Sara Quach is a PhD student at Swinburne University of Technology and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/sara-quach-175976" target="_blank">here</a>. Both are authors for The Conversation.
</body></html>

How hiring for the ‘right look’ influences retail shoppers

<html><body>
Victorian real estate agency hockingstuart has posted total sales figure for the 2014-15 financial year at $4.6 billion from more than 6,300 property sales.
Listings increased by 44% during the same period according to managing director and chief executive officer Nigel O'Neil, who said the agency now had a 14% share of the Victorian auction market.
<div>
Celebrating the network’s 30th anniversary this year, hockingstuart has launched additional businesses to supplement its core real estate offering, such as a <a href="https://www.yourporter.com.au/" target="_blank">utility connections business</a> YourPorter, a home removals business and have plans for a mortgage broker business hockingstuart Finance. 
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>"These not only enhance our service offering for our customers but enable us to become a one-stop shop for everything related to the house hunt,” Nigel O'Neil said.</div>
</body></html>

Hockingstuart posts $4.6 billion in FY15 total sales

<html><body>
The removal of the carbon tax was meant to save the average household about A$550 per year.
So a year after the repeal of the tax, have we got our savings?
An analysis by the Herald Sun newspaper says no.
It claims that (Victorian) “households saved less than A$300” over the course of the year. This was made up of about A$112 in reduced electricity prices and A$98 in cheaper gas. The Herald Sun was unable to find anything else, so the amount of concrete savings they tracked down is certainly well under A$300.
This is not surprising. Even if they had looked much harder, the journalists would have failed to measure the household savings. A moment of reflection will tell you that trying to isolate any effect of the carbon tax outside the regulated energy sectors is a pretty silly task.
Why? Well, let’s think about what else has buffeted household budgets and general prices over the past year.
A big factor has been the exchange rate. The <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/chart-pack/exchange-rates" target="_blank">trade-weighted index</a> of the Australian dollar has dropped about 10% in the past year.
Of course, this reflects a range of changes in exports, imports and exchange rates. But if we pick a currency that matters to import prices (and therefore to households) like the <a href="https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=AUD&amp;to=CNY&amp;view=2Y" target="_blank">Chinese Yuan</a>, the Aussie dollar has fallen about 20% in the past year.
Against the <a href="https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=AUD&amp;to=USD&amp;view=2Y" target="_blank">US dollar</a> the fall is even bigger: almost 22% over the past year.
Despite a bumpy ride, the Aussie dollar has ended up <a href="https://www.xe.com/currencycharts/?from=AUD&amp;to=USD&amp;view=2Y" target="_blank">pretty constant</a> against the euro (in case you’re planning a holiday in the Greek islands). But the dollar’s weak performance against other major currencies will undoubtedly have pushed up pretty much all import prices for households.
Imported goods account for <a href="https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.ZS" target="_blank">about 20% of Australian household expenditure</a>, which means that a household on an after-tax income of A$45,000 per year (roughly middle income) has faced a rise in the cost of imports of about A$900 over the past 12 months.
So the exchange rate changes alone have probably eaten up the carbon tax savings, and then some. If you wanted to isolate the carbon tax effect on prices, you would first need to pull out all of the exchange-rate effects from those same prices.
Issue of interest
Of course, not everything has run against households, and the carbon tax savings have not been the only windfall. The Reserve Bank of Australia has <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/cash-rate/" target="_blank">lowered the cash rate</a> by 0.5% over the past year. If your household has an “average” home loan of A$300,000 and your bank has passed on half of the cut in the RBA’s interest rate, this should be saving you about A$750 per year.
Of course, interest rate changes affect business costs and prices in all sorts of ways. So if you want to work out the effect of removing the carbon tax, you’ll also need to pull out all interest-rate effects on prices.
These are just a few of the big changes. There are many more little changes that push prices up or down every day. Trying to separate out the effect of the carbon price repeal from all these other effects is either a mug’s game, or a year-long project for a PhD student!
So what about the Herald Sun’s effort? The article doesn’t contain too much serious analysis. It mainly looks at how energy prices have changed, energy being the main sector that paid a direct price under the carbon tax. Yet even here, the story is confusing.
In its <a href="https://www.aemc.gov.au/Major-Pages/Price-trends" target="_blank">2014 price trends review</a>, the Australian Energy Market Commission noted that:
…residential electricity prices are generally flat or falling around the country and we expect that to continue due to a combination of falling demand, increased competition and tighter rules on network costs.
In other words, even without the removal of the carbon tax, there were already significant pressures pushing electricity prices down. These will continue over the next few years.
So, where’s my $550 then?
Does this mean that the claimed savings due to the removal of the carbon tax were hokum?
No, just impossible to prove. Holding everything else constant, the carbon tax pushed up prices to households. That was the point of the carbon tax.
Unfortunately, the government at the time didn’t do a great job of selling the scheme and, unlike British Columbia in Canada, didn’t bring the public along to support the scheme.
The change in government in 2013 and subsequent removal of the carbon tax last year undoubtedly brought prices back down. The “rockets and feathers” phenomenon means that prices probably went up faster when the tax was introduced than they fell when it was removed. But over a 12-month period, prices will have fallen, holding everything else constant.
But the point is we can never hold everything else constant, and so we will never be able to show exactly how much households have saved through the removal of the carbon tax. We may get empirical analysis over time but until someone gets down and dirty with the household pricing data (dirtier, ironically, than a tabloid newspaper), we will not be able to separate out the carbon tax from the huge range of other factors that have affected the spending power of Australian households over the past year.
So if you can’t find your A$550, don’t worry. No one else can find it either. It might be there somewhere, or it might not.
But if you’re going to worry about it, you should probably be worrying about interest rates, currency markets, electricity demand, and a heap of other things too.
Stephen King is professor, department of economics, Monash University and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/stephen-king-1374" target="_blank">here</a>.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/stephen-king-1374" rel="author"></a>
</body></html>

Measuring savings from the carbon tax is a mug’s game

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Investors should steer clear of the get rich quick approach and instead build up a quality portfolio that’s sustainable for the long term.
We’ve all read about the get rich quick stories where property investors build a large portfolio in a short period of time by using equity in one property to purchase another one and so on. On the surface it all looks pretty good but often there’s not enough equity in the overall portfolio to keep it afloat if any undesirable outcomes occur such as an increase in interest rates, long tenant vacancy periods or a drop in market values.
In many cases in these situations, the inexperienced investor will choose cheaper properties simply to increase the size of the portfolio instead of saving up a bigger deposit to purchase quality properties that will be able to better withstand a market downturn.
In addition if you don’t have a financial buffer then your portfolio can very easily come crashing down like a deck of cards especially if you’re relying on the rental market to go up to be able to pay the mortgages. Successful and sustainable property investing is very much about selecting the right types of properties in great locations.
Ask any seriously wealthy property investor who has seen a few property cycles and they will tell you that you should purchase property in areas where there has been good demand in the past, demand for it now and likely to be good demand well into the future.
When investing, quality comes first whether you are looking to start or add to your property portfolio.
Don't get hung up on how many properties you buy as you’re better off having say two million dollars invested in three or four quality properties than have two million dollars invested in 10 average ones.
Here's how you can get on the right track to becoming a successful property investor:
HAVE A PLAN 
By writing down clear goals for the future growth of your portfolio you should be able to determine how much money you’ll need for the necessary deposits and incorporate this information into your overall financial plan. Make sure you work out whether you’re buying properties to hold for the long- term or whether a buy, renovate and sell strategy would be better suited to your needs. You will need to factor in any major changes to your likely income (e.g. plans to start or grow your family) or expenditure streams when examining the timeframes needed to save the deposits.  BE A FARMER NOT A HUNTER 
There are people who are prepared to farm and cultivate a crop, with a several-year outlook and there are those who want a return almost immediately (the hunter mentality). Unfortunately most people have a hunter mentality. They throw a spear, and want an immediate result which in my experience is not the mentality of a smart, seasoned property investor. As the old saying goes “wealth is the transfer of money from the impatient to the patient”. 
TREAT YOUR PORTFOLIO AS A SMALL BUSINESS 
If you want to maximise the return on your investment you must ensure you are receiving the best return possible on it. Regardless of whether you have one, three, five or more properties you need to treat them all like a business and undertake regular reviews no less than six monthly. 
INVEST IN GOOD ADVICE 
Good property investors accept that they don’t know it all and are willing to pay for good advice. The old adage “you get what you pay for” rings true so if you’re not paying for the advice you’re receiving then it’s probably not worth following. Invest in a good accountant, solicitor, building inspector, buyer’s agent, quantity surveyor, property manager, finance broker, financial advisor etc. Ask your advisors if there are any financial changes that need to be implemented now to make it easier to achieve your property investment plans for the coming years. PROTECT YOUR CAPITAL
The preservation and return of your capital is more important than the return on it. Get that around the wrong way and you’re very likely to do your dough. Always remember that if an investment opportunity is offering a higher than average return for the asset class there will be a reason for it and it’s generally a higher risk investment. You need to decide: am I an investor or speculator? It’s ok to speculate just know you’re doing it and don’t do it with more than 10% of your net worth as if you do your dough you can recover from a 10% loss. It’s much harder to recover if you’re losing much more than that at any one time.
TAKE ACTION
The world is full of broke procrastinators. Good property investors take action. They’ve done their research, they know when and where to buy and they’re confident with their investment.
Patrick Bright is a Sydney-based buyer’s agent for EPS Property Search and can be contacted <a href="https://www.epspropertysearch.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Six tips for being a successful property investor: Patrick Bright

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Even before the government’s options paper on tax reform is released later this year, many reforms have been taken off the table, at least before the next election. Here’s the expert view on six.
Broadening or increasing the GST
Some experts say expanding the GST, which is a regressive tax, would unfairly hit middle-income earners and women.
Others say a broader base, not higher rate, would be the best approach.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.11.45%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a><img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.11.45%20AM.png" alt="" style="line-height: 1.3em;"> 
 
If done as part of a package of tax reforms, John Freebairn argues increasing the GST could actually boost our standard of living.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott and Treasurer Joe Hockey have said they will not make changes to the GST before the next election, and want the states to take responsibility for reform in this area. This is despite the fact that they could increase the GST without the support of the states.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.13.45%20AM.png">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.13.45%20AM.png" alt="">
Fixing the asymmetry between negative gearing and capital gains tax
As Helen Hodgson has explained, negative gearing would be less attractive if the capital gain on the sale of an investment was taxed in full.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.15.54%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.15.54%20AM.png" alt="">
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.17.10%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.17.10%20AM.png" alt="">
The Henry Review recommended reducing the benefit of negative gearing by allowing only a 40% capital gains discount, but this was rejected by then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
Antony Ting says negative gearing is not a fair tax policy - particularly when considering the way investment properties are treated.
Dale Boccabella says the best solution would be to quarantine negative gearing so that losses on investment properties couldn’t be used as deductions against other income. But he also thinks abolishing it is preferable.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.18.13%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a> 
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.18.13%20AM.png" alt="">
Prime Minister Tony Abbott has ruled out any changes to negative gearing, arguing to do so would be akin to increasing taxes.
Adopting global measures to prevent tax avoidance by multinationals
When Australia hosted the G20 leaders summit in November last year, it agreed to a number of actions to ensure fairness in the international tax system. The OECD is leading global reforms, arguing unilateral action could harm the global agreement that is required to stop multinationals shifting profits to reduce their tax burden.
Since then, Treasurer Joe Hockey has announced new measures specifically designed to target multinationals using complex schemes to escape paying tax. Experts say the measures lack teeth since they only apply to foreign and not Australian multinationals.
The next set of OECD-led measures to address global tax avoidance are due to be released at this year’s G20 summit in Turkey. The OECD recommendations will be finalised by December.
Taxing trusts as if they were companies
In 1999 the Ralph Review of Business Taxation recommended that<a href="https://theconversation.com/shock-hockey-was-right-on-taxing-trusts-757"> </a>trusts be taxed as companies, a move that originally got the support of Treasurer Peter Costello. Political pressure soon saw the government back away from this plan, and despite Joe Hockey showing support for the idea back in 2011, it is not one that has the support of the government.
Dale Boccabella says the taxing of trusts is another anomaly in Australia’s tax system that is unfair. Trusts are commonly used by families with a high income to distribute funds to low-earning family members in order to minimise tax.
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.19.31%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.19.31%20AM.png" alt="">
Removing concessions on the taxation of super
Most experts agree superannuation tax concessions are unevenly distributed and are in need of reform<a href="https://theconversation.com/superannuation%20tax%20concessions%20are%20growing%20rapidly,%20are%20unevenly%20distributed%20and%20are%20in%20need%20of%20reform.">.</a>
<a href="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.20.59%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/23/Screen%20Shot%202015-07-23%20at%208.20.59%20AM.png" alt="">
The Financial System Inquiry suggests super tax breaks shouldn’t exceed what someone would get from the age pension.
The Labor Party wants to remove the tax-free concession available to people with annual superannuation incomes from earnings of more than A$75,000, a move it says would raise more than $14 billion over 10 years.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott has ruled out any “adverse changes” to superannuation, including changes to super tax concessions.
Expanding land tax over stamp duty
The Henry tax review argued stamp duties are a highly inefficient tax on land, and that land tax could provide an alternative and more stable source of revenue for the states.
Miranda Stewart says stamp duty is volatile<a href="https://theconversation.com/housing-and-tax-why-is-reform-so-hard-3300">,</a> feeds into house prices (contributing to lack of affordability) and taxes more heavily those people who purchase new housing more often, than those people who don’t.
Unfortunately, says Danika Wright, some states are addicted to stamp duty, making reform in this area highly unlikely.
Charis Palmer is deputy business editor at The Conversation and Emil Jeyaratnam is multimedia editor. Both can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/au/team" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Six simple tax reforms plagued by politics

The residential transformation of St Kilda Road is set to continue into with more new apartment plans for the sought-after boulevard.

Wing Tai Asia has lodged plans for a major residential tower at 464-466 St Kilda Road, replacing the former VACC House with an 18-storey mixed-use development designed around a retained heritage podium and a sculpted contemporary tower.

The proposal, prepared under Victoria’s Significant Residential Development with Affordable Housing pathway, would deliver 325 apartments and ground-floor retail across the prominent 4,653 sqm boulevard site in Melbourne’s St Kilda Road North Precinct.

The project centres on the adaptive reuse of the site’s heritage-listed VACC Building, an eight-storey office designed by Bernard Evans that has occupied the address for decades. Planning documents state the development would involve “carefully dismantling and conserving off-site the original metal fabric of the podium visible from St Kilda Road,” before reinstating it as the defining frontage of the new scheme.

Above the restored podium, Wing Tai is proposing a curvilinear residential tower. The scheme includes 172 one-bedroom apartments, 63 two-bedroom apartments, 66 three-bedroom apartments, and 24 four-bedroom apartments, alongside two ground-floor food and beverage tenancies fronting St Kilda Road.

The tower has been designed with substantial articulation and variable setbacks to minimise perceived bulk and maintain view corridors along the boulevard. Urbis, which prepared the planning report, said the design “has been significantly articulated through a curvilinear design” with “an interplay with materials, façade expression and depth” to create visual separation and visual interest.

The proposal also includes 254 basement car spaces, landscaped pedestrian links connecting St Kilda Road and Queens Lane, and a biophilic landscape strategy featuring canopy trees, raised planters, cascading greenery and a glass oculus pool overlooking the eastern frontage.

Planning documents confirm the $270.1 million development will contribute 3 per cent of project costs to the Social Housing Growth Fund as part of the application process.

Wing Tai acquired the St Kilda Road property in 2018 alongside Abacus Property Group for $95.38 million, before later consolidating ownership of the site. The property previously served as the Victorian Automobile Chamber of Commerce headquarters for around 60 years.

The transformation of the St Kilda Rd boulevard is already beginning to materialise, with a number of high-profile projects recently completed, launched, or approaching launch as developers continue to back the long-term appeal of the precinct.

Among the most notable recent completions is Louise by Samuel Property Group, just off the strip on Queens Lane, the same pocket Hirsch &amp; Faigen recently launched The Queensbury. Mirvac is too on the same street with The Albertine, which is approaching completion.

Dexus recently secured approval for its slice of St Kilda Road, while Gurner also has approved plans for the precinct.

Joel Robinson

Wing Tai unveils 325-apartment St Kilda Road tower on former VACC House site

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

Property Observer

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News