<html><body>
 
Over the 2014-15 financial year vacant land selling prices have continued to rise across the combined capital cities. Meanwhile, vacant land prices have actually fallen over the year in regional markets.
 
<div>
Data based on settled sales over the 2014-15 financial years shows that vacant land selling prices have increased by 6.0% across the combined capital cities. While capital city land prices are increasing, across the combined regional markets land prices have fallen by -3.4% over the year.
As at June 2015, the median selling price of vacant land was recorded at $258,543 across the combined capital cities and $156,500 across the combined regional markets. Median land prices in regional areas of the country are now -39% lower than those in capital cities, the widest differential since August 1990. Over the 25 years to June 2015, median vacant land prices have increased by 417% (6.8%pa) across the combined capital cities and by 422% (6.8%pa) across the combined regional areas.
</div>
 
<div>
<a href="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--median-vacant-land-prices.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<h3>Median vacant land prices over time</h3>
<img src="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--median-vacant-land-prices.png" alt="">
</div>
While prices have fairly consistently risen, there has been a consistent trend towards smaller lot sizes. Although you pay a lot more for land you get a lot less for your money. Of those vacant land lots sold over the year to June 2015, the median lot size was 452sqm across the combined capital cities and 810sqm across the combined regional markets.
The median lot size has been reasonably stable across the combined capital cities over the past twelve months, whereas it has actually risen by 8.3% over the past year across regional markets. The median lot size for capital city vacant land has seemingly hit a trough having been relatively stable over the past 2 years. Meanwhile lot sizes have trended higher over the past year in regional areas.
<a href="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-median-vacant-lot-sizes.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<h3>Median vacant land lot sizes over time</h3>
<img src="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-median-vacant-lot-sizes.png" alt="">
With higher prices and fairly steady land areas, the rate per square metre of land has continued to rise over the past year across the combined capital cities while it has fallen in regional markets. At the end of June 2015 the rate per square metre was recorded at $557 across the combined capital cities and $170/sqm across the combined regional markets.
Chart 3 shows that the differential in the rate per square metre between capital city and regional residential vacant land is significant. This is a function of the high cost of vacant land in capital cities and the relatively small lot sizes. To put this in perspective, 25 years ago the rate/sqm for capital city vacant land was $66 and the typical lot size was 750sqm. Today capital city land costs $557/sqm and is only 450sqm on average. While a 750sqm lot in a capital city cost $50,000 25 years ago, today it would cost $417,800.
<a href="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-median-rate-per-sqm.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<h3>Median rate per square metre for vacant land over time</h3>
<img src="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-median-rate-per-sqm.png" alt="">
When looking at individual capital cities, vacant land prices are much higher than all other capital cities in Sydney. The cost of vacant land has risen sharply over the past year in Sydney, Melbourne and Perth over the past year. Typical lot sizes have actually risen across most cities over the past year but have generally fallen over the past decade. On a rate per square metre basis, vacant land in Sydney and Perth is much more expensive than all other capital cities. The rate per square metre has generally risen over the past year.
<a href="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-capital-city-vacant-land.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<h3>Capital city vacant land statistics - June 2015*</h3>
<img src="/images/2015/09/21/2015-09-21--pp-capital-city-vacant-land.png" alt="">
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

Capital city land prices just keep on rising: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
Last week the Reserve Bank’s (RBA) Head of Financial Stability Luci Ellis gave an interesting speech entitled ‘Property Markets and Financial Stability: What We Know So Far.' 
In my opinion one of the more interesting pieces of analysis in the speech was the analysis of inner city housing prices relative to those in the outer ring.  The chart below was the analysis showed in the speech.
<a href="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-12.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-12.jpg" alt="">
<div class="entry">
Regarding this chart, the speech noted the following key points:
<ul>
<li>Land is two things: it is both space and place. Many have observed that Australia has plenty of the former. But I think the lesson of past booms as well as recent times is that it’s place – location – that really matters. If we think back to boom–bust episodes of the past, whether in land for new development, railways or prime office buildings, in every case you can see people trying to get their hands on the best locations, to take advantage of whatever future economic outcomes they expect. </li>
<li>Location explains far more of the variation in individual property prices than block size (Hansen 2006). Yes, some people like a bigger garden, for privacy or to enjoy in other ways. But being in the ‘right’ kind of neighbourhood with the best amenities, close to commercial centres and other services, is more important to most people, if their willingness to pay for it is any guide.</li>
<li>The physical reality is that the supply of good locations is more or less fixed in the short term. So any sizeable boost to demand cannot be fully absorbed by more supply. The newly built property is simply not the same as the existing stock, because it’s somewhere else. We should therefore not be surprised that strong demand for property does not just change the general price level for that asset, but also its distribution. We can see this in the increase in prices of inner-ring properties relative to those further out, especially in Sydney</li>
</ul>
I agree with this analysis; housing closer to the city centres and closer to major working nodes is more desirable. Also in many capital cities, as we see houses in inner city areas knocked down to make way for higher density development, the underlying land component becomes intrinsically more valuable. Subsequently, the availability of houses in many inner city areas are actually reducing. After I read this section of the speech I decided to go digging in the data to see just how much difference there was in terms of inner city house values and growth in these values over the past year relative to values and growth across the rest of the capital cities.  For the purposes of this analysis we have determined that the inner-city region is within 10 kilometres of each capital city.
<a href="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-22.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-22.jpg" alt="">
The above chart shows that in terms of median house values, the proportion of homes above the city-wide median is substantially higher in inner city areas. Even in a city such as Sydney where housing is less affordable, once you shift more than 10 kilometres from the city centre, only 29.3% of suburbs have a median house value above the city-wide median. In all cities, more than half of all inner city suburbs have a median higher than the city-wide median and all non-inner city areas have less than 50% of suburbs with a median greater than the city-wide median.
While the fact that the cost of housing is higher as you move closer to the city-centre the magnitude of the difference is significant. The other factor to consider is the growth in values in the inner-city versus the rest of the city.  This is where the results change somewhat.
<a href="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-31.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/16/Chart-31.jpg" alt="">
Sydney is probably the most interesting result here. Although it has seen the sharpest rises in home values over the past year, suburbs outside of the 10 kilometre inner ring have generally experienced stronger value growth. Of course it is important to recall that Sydney values have been rising for more than three years, and growth, while continuing, has shifted from inner city areas to more affordable outer housing markets. 
Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Canberra were the only capital cities in which more than half of the inner city suburbs have recorded value growth in excess of that recorded across the cities. Notably each of Perth, Hobart and Darwin are seeing more outer suburbs outperforming than inner suburbs. Of course it should be remembered that home values are now falling in Perth and Darwin and clearly this is impacting the inner city performance. 
The lesson here of course is just because inner city housing is generally more desirable, it doesn’t mean it is immune from falls in the event of a housing market downturn.
Inner city housing markets will likely remain more desirable than those suburbs further afield, due in large to the abundant amenity typically available in these areas.  Although the desire to live in these inner city areas is strong, the reality is that the cost of housing in these locations is restrictive and the supply is relatively short, so many can’t access the housing they want in these areas. 
As some of the examples show, although housing in inner city areas is more expensive, it doesn’t necessarily mean that value growth will consistently outperform growth across the rest of the city. 
Furthermore, as the Perth and Darwin highlights, inner city housing isn’t bullet-proof and in the event of a housing market downturn it has in the past and will potentially in the future also see value declines.
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</body></html>

Inner city housing more expensive but growth not strongest: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released housing finance data for July 2015 earlier this week.
Throughout July, there was $32.8 billion worth of housing finance commitments. This figure was comprised of $19.2 billion worth of commitments to owner occupiers and $13.6 billion in commitments to investors. Over the month, the total value of housing finance commitments increased by 1.5% to be 15.0% higher year-on-year.
<a href="/images/2015/09/10/Chart-11.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/10/Chart-11.jpg" alt=""> 
At $19.2 billion, owner occupier housing finance commitments increased by 2.2% over the month and were 13.9% higher year-on-year. Breaking the $19.2 billion into its components: $1.6 billion was for construction of dwellings, $1.1 billion was for the purchase of new dwellings, $6.2 billion was for refinances of established dwellings and $10.2 billion was for the purchase of established dwellings. Over the month, commitments for the construction of dwellings fell -1.5%, purchase of new dwellings rose 8.4%, refinances rose 3.3% and purchase of established dwellings rose 1.5%.  
Over the past 12 months the refinance segment has been the key driver of growth in the owner occupier lending segment with commitments up 23.7%. In comparison, year-on-year changes have been recorded at -7.6% for construction of dwellings, 15.4% for purchase of new dwellings and 12.6% for purchase of established dwellings. Recently growth in the owner occupier lending segment has been lacklustre, driven largely by refinances however, the 13.9% year-on-year rise in owner occupier housing finance commitments excluding refinances is the largest rise since February 2014.
 
<a href="/images/2015/09/10/Chart-21.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/10/Chart-21.jpg" alt="">
Turning to the investment segment of housing finance commitments, this has over recent years been a significant driver of new demand. In July 2015, investor housing finance commitments rose by 0.5% to be 16.5% higher year-on-year. If we look at the $13.6 billion in investment housing commitments across its components, $1.1 billion was for construction of new investment dwellings and $12.5 billion was for established homes. 
Over the month, commitments for new construction rose 11.7% compared to a -0.4% fall in commitments for established homes. Year-on-year investor commitments for construction of new dwellings has increased by 81.5% compared to a 12.9% rise in the much larger segment for purchase of established investment homes.  The chart above shows the recent weakness in commitments for established homes and the ongoing rise in commitments for new construction.
It seems that there is a growing appetite for investment in off-the plan investment properties while demand for established investment stock is waning a little.  Despite the monthly rise in demand for investment lending, the rate of growth has started to ease as Australian authorised deposit-taking institutions (ADIs) tweak their lending policies in line with policy updates from APRA aimed at slowing growth in the pace of total investor housing credit.
Housing credit data for July 2015 showed that growth in owner occupier credit is ramping up while investor credit demand is potentially slowing. This release of housing finance data appears to support that notion. The ADIs will be hoping that they can entice additional activity from the owner occupier segment over the coming months as there is likely to be a slowdown in lending to the investment segment.
Housing finance data is continuing to rise however, it appears that growth is starting to tilt away from investors towards the owner occupier segment. Although regulators such as the Reserve Bank and APRA will be glad to see that exuberance from investment borrowers may be slowing, they will be very keen to monitor and ensure that any pick-up from owner occupier borrowers is not as a result of a relaxing of lending standards.
Both the housing credit and housing finance data will be closely monitored over the coming months in order to see if this transition continues. Specifically we will be watching whether housing credit can continue to increase its rate of growth and if new commitments continue to tilt away from investors towards owner occupiers and what impact that may have on housing finance demand.
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Housing finance commitments rise in July: Cameron Kusher

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
As a result of new lending criteria delivered to deposit-taking institutions by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) a lot of attention has been placed on the pace of lending for residential housing investment. 
The APRA guidelines highlighted a limit on annual investment credit growth for ADIs of 10% however, from that point until June 2015 the annual rate of investment credit growth continued to increase.
<a href="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.30.35%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.30.35%20PM.png" alt="">
 
Although it’s only one month of data, the latest housing credit data to July 2015 suggests that we may be finally set to see a slowing of investment credit growth. 
Over the 12 months to July 2015, the Reserve Bank (RBA) reports that total housing credit rose by 7.4%; its fastest annual rate of growth since October 2010, and consisted of a 5.3% annual increase in owner occupier credit (fastest growth since March 2012) and a 10.8% annual rise in investor credit.
<a href="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.31.43%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.31.43%20PM.png" alt="">
 
Investor housing credit is still growing at a robust pace however, at 10.8% over the year it is down from 11.1% in June and at its lowest level since March 2015. “In fact, the monthly investor housing credit data shows credit advanced by just 0.6% in July which was its lowest monthly increase since October 2013. 
Investment segment lending data on the investment segment suggests that following recent changes to lending policies by Australian ADIs, lending to the investment segment of the market is set to slow further over the coming months. 
<a href="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.32.48%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.32.48%20PM.png" alt="">
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
With mortgage rates remaining low we would anticipate the rate of growth will slow to around the 10% per annum benchmark, however this is unlikely to drop much further than that.
While any slowdown in investment growth may have an impact on overall housing credit figures, Mr Kusher noted that it’s important to recall that a much greater proportion of overall lending goes to owner occupiers. 
In July 2015, the total value of outstanding housing credit was $1.476 trillion. This figure was comprised of $906.4 billion in lending to owner occupiers and $569.8 billion to investors. 
It’s important to remember that the rate of growth in owner occupier lending has also been rising although over the past year there was a $45.2 billion expansion in credit to owner occupiers compared to $56.1 billion to investors. Furthermore, the proportion of total mortgage credit to investors is at a record high 38.6%. 
ADIs of course don’t lend exclusively for mortgages and the latest data shows an encouraging lift in credit to businesses. In July 2015 business credit rose by 0.7% to be 4.8% higher over the year. Total business credit is currently recorded at $799.7 billion, which is significantly larger than investment housing credit.
<a href="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.33.38%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/03/Screen%20Shot%202015-09-03%20at%2012.33.38%20PM.png" alt="">
 
The RBA and APRA are likely to be very encouraged to see the first signs of a slowing of lending to the investment housing segment and would hope that it continues over the coming months. 
While this may result in a slight slowing in overall housing credit growth increases, this shouldn’t be viewed as a negative outcome. If the recent increase in business credit can continue it would arguably provide greater economic benefit. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Has growth in investor housing credit reached its apex? Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released building approvals data for July 2015 earlier this week. According to the data there were 19,298 dwelling approvals over the month which represents an increase of 4.2% over the month and a year-on-year rise of 13.4%. Monthly dwelling approvals reached a record high of 20,260 approvals in March 2015 and the July 2015 result represents the fifth largest monthly number of dwelling approvals on record.
<a href="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-1.jpg" alt="">
 
Over the month there were more unit approvals than house approvals. In fact it was only the seventh time on record that there were more units approved over the month than houses, five of which have happened in 2015. Although unit approvals outnumbered house approvals over the month it is important to note that they tend to be much more volatile than house approvals and are ultimately less likely to be built than houses (approximately 85% of all unit approvals proceed through to a completion historically). Although this is the case, particularly for larger unit development, the economic benefit is extended over a longer period because they take much longer to complete.
In July 2015 there were 9,479 houses and 9,819 unit approvals over the month. House approvals fell by -2.6% in July and were -2.1% lower year-on-year.  Meanwhile, unit approvals increased by 11.7% in July (following a fall of -13.3% in June) and were 33.8% higher year-on-year.  On an annual basis there has been a record high 224,121 approvals to July 2015. To put the recent ramp-up in approvals into perspective, three years ago there were just 148,449 approvals over the year.
<a href="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-2.jpg" alt="">
As the number of approvals has increased, the greatest rise has occurred across the multi-unit segment. Over the past 12 months a record high 48.3% of all approvals were for units. If you look just at the capital city markets 55.7% of all dwelling approvals were for units.  
The rise in unit approvals is reflective of changing lifestyle patterns with more and more people preferring to live closer to the city centre and along transport spines where most of these units are located. It also shows that developers are enjoying a level of confidence by seeking approvals for a record high number of units.  
Another factor contributing to the rise in higher density dwelling approvals is changes in town planning policies where governments are aiming to maximise existing transport infrastructure by allowing higher densities along existing and planned transport corridors and mixed use precincts.
<a href="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/09/02/Chart-3.jpg" alt="">
 
If we look at the types of units that are being approved it is interesting to note the sharp rise in high-rise approvals, that is units in a block of four or more storeys.  Over the past 12 months, a record high 63.4% of all unit approvals were within high-rise projects while a record low 26.2% of approvals were terrace and townhouses and a record low 4.9% of approvals were for units in a one or two storey block. Again, these figures just go to show the heightened level of developer confidence particularly when you consider the relative level of risk associated with high rise development.
The number of dwelling approvals remains high albeit it is slightly lower than recent record highs. Strength in the approvals figures are becoming increasingly reliant on the multi-unit sector which tend to be much more volatile than house approvals. With many banks, credit unions and building societies tightening their lending criteria it will be interesting to see over the coming months if this flows into approvals and causes developer confidence to wane.
No matter what happens with approvals over the coming months and years there is a strong pipeline of new construction, much of which is high-rise and will extend out over a number of years.  Furthermore, with population growth slowing we should see a better relationship between housing supply and housing demand.  This is already being seen by the fact that capital city rental rates are increasing at an historic low rate currently.
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Rise in unit approvals drives rebound: Cameron Kusher

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
We’re now seeing home sales trend below $400,000 which is making it much harder for price-sensitive buyers to purchase into capital city markets.
37.4% of all home sales nationally were at less than $400,000 compared to 52.0% between $400,000 and $1 million and 10.6% over $1 million over the 12 months to June 2015. 
Sales below $400,000 were at a record low over the past year and sales above $1 million were at a record high.
<a href="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.35.28%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.35.28%20AM.png" alt="">
 
Across capital cities, 25.1% of home sales were under $400,000, 60.1% were between $400,000 and $1 million and 14.8% were in excess of $1 million. 
Twenty years ago 95.2% of all capital city houses and 96.7% of units sold for less than $400,000. Meanwhile, only 0.4% of all houses and 0.3% of all units sold transacted for more than $1 million.
<a href="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.37.04%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.37.04%20AM.png" alt="">
 
 
Ten years ago, the proportion of sales under $400,000 had fallen sharply relative to 10 years earlier. At this time, 66.2% of houses and 73.8% of units had sold over the year for less than $400,000. In comparison, 4.0% of houses and 2.3% of units across the capital cities sold for more than $1 million. 
Five years ago, around one third of all capital city house sales (34.1%) and 46.4% of units sold for less than $400,000. At the same time, 10.1% of capital city houses and 3.8% of units sold for more than $1 million.
<a href="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.38.05%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/27/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-27%20at%2011.38.05%20AM.png" alt="">
 
Looking at the activity over the past year: 
Canberra (7.4%) and Sydney (7.8%) recorded the lowest proportion of house sales under $400,000. 
Hobart (61.2%) was the only city to have more than half of all house sales below $400,000. 
Currently, the unit market offers more opportunity to purchase below $400,000 however, each of Sydney (16.3%), Melbourne (35.9%), Perth (38.5%), Darwin (29.7%) and Canberra (43.3%) recorded a majority of unit sales above this price point. 
CoreLogic RP Data reported a record high proportion of houses and units sold for more than $1 million over the past 12 months. In Sydney, more than a third of all houses (36.8%) sold for more than $1 million. Melbourne had the second highest proportion of sales over $1 million (17.7%). 
Although Melbourne had a record high proportion of houses sold over $1 million it was less than half the proportion of sales in excess of $1 million recorded in Sydney. 
For units, Sydney had the highest proportion of sales over $1 million (11.6%) and was the only capital city in which more than 10% of unit sales were in excess of $1 million. In fact, Sydney had a higher proportion of unit sales over $1 million than each of Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart, Darwin and Canberra had for houses. 
Although we anticipate that the rate of capital growth will slow over the coming year we still expect values to generally rise. As a result we would expect a further decline in the proportion of homes selling below $400,000. 
 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic RP Data. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/cameron-kusher/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Home sales trend below $400,000: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
With plenty of talk about a housing bubble and home values climbing much higher in Sydney and Melbourne, housing is looking expensive to many Australians. 
Low interest rates and the strong gains in certain areas are making residential housing investment quite attractive for some which is one of the drivers resulting in increasing home values. While housing may be looking expensive to locals, the declining Australian dollar means that it may be looking more attractive to foreign buyers.
Since combined capital city home values reached their most recent low point in May 2012 they have risen by 26.8%. At the same time the Australian dollar has fallen by -13.3% over that period in trade-weighted index terms. While the depreciation in the dollar has no impact on local buyers, for off-shore buyers the fall in the Australian dollar is likely to make Australian housing even more attractive. Furthermore, the Reserve Bank continues to state that there is a need for an even lower dollar which would exacerbate the relative affordability even further.
Foreign buyers are meant to be purchasing brand new homes in most instances. There have been numerous recent reports of foreign buyers not adhering to these rules.  Furthermore a recent parliamentary inquiry found that the Foreign Investment Review Board was significantly underfunded and as a result has not been able to effectively monitor and enforce foreign investment rules.
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-31.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-31.jpg" alt="">
Combined capital city home values have increased by 26.8% between May 2012 and June 2015. Keep in mind that these figures are heavily influenced by the Sydney and Melbourne housing markets with these the only two capital cities recording value growth in excess of this figure over the period. When you look at that 26.8% increase across other currencies you can see the impact of the falling exchange rate. Of those currencies highlighted only the Japanese Yen and Indonesian Rupiah have seen values rise by a greater amount. Across most other currencies the relative value rises have been significantly lower than they have been in Australian dollar terms.
Once you look at capital cities that have seen relatively lower recent capital growth, there has been a significant improvement in Australian housing affordability for foreign buyers. Not to mention the fact that in many of these foreign countries mortgage holders are borrowing at significantly lower interest rates than those available to Australians.
Sydney
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-21.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-21.jpg" alt="">
Melbourne
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-31-1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-31-1.jpg" alt="">
 
Brisbane
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-41.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-41.jpg" alt="">
Adelaide
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-51.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-51.jpg" alt="">
 
Perth
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-61.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-61.jpg" alt="">
 
Hobart
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-71.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge </a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-71.jpg" alt="">
Darwin
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-81.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-81.jpg" alt="">
 
Canberra
<a href="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-9.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge </a>
<img src="/images/2015/07/08/Chart-9.jpg" alt="">
 
With the RBA stating that the Australian dollar remains overvalued, any further falls in the Aussie dollar are likely to result in even more attractive buying conditions for foreign buyers. Given this it is imperative that foreign investment rules are tightened and FIRB improve their surveillance work.  A central register of foreign buyers would also be seemingly important. The Victorian Government has recently announced that it will increase fees and charges to foreign buyers of property in that state.  Despite howls of protest it would seem that this is likely to have little material impact on foreign demand for housing.  Furthermore, a national approach similar to this would be a good step towards appropriately funding FIRB to undertake their review and surveillance of foreign housing investment.  Particularly given that should the dollar fall further demand from off-shore buyers is likely to increase.
Earlier this week Federal Treasury released the Exposure Drafts and Regulatory Impact Statement of legislation designed to tighten foreign investment rules, including those relating to residential real estate. The document can be read <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Implementing-Foreign-Investment-Reforms" target="_blank">here</a> and submissions can be made up until Friday 17 July.
</body></html>

Australian property, expensive for us, not so for foreigners: Cameron Kusher 

<html><body>
Newly approved housing supply has moved to new record heights, with 214,331 dwelling approvals recorded nationally over the past year.
The proportion of these approvals which were for units is also at a record high, accounting for 45.9% of all approvals.
The surge in dwelling approvals has coincided with very low interest rates and surging demand from the investment segment of the market. 
Across the combined capital cities more than half of all dwelling approvals are for units and in each capital city (except Adelaide, Perth and Hobart) more than 50% of approvals over the past year were for units. 
Data from the 2011 Census shows that across the country units are more than twice as likely to be rented as houses. This would indicate a clear preference from the investment segment which is currently so active, for units over houses.
While the number of new dwellings being approved is significant, it is worthwhile examining on a smaller scale the regions where the new housing supply is being approved. Looking at dwelling approvals across SA4 regions of the country, we have listed the top 20 regions for approvals for both houses and units over the 2014-15 financial year to April 2014.
For houses, the region with the greatest number of approvals over the financial year to-date was South East Melbourne (which includes council regions such as Casey and Cardinia) with 4,874 approvals. Looking at the top 20 list published, 15 of the 20 regions listed are located within capital cities with only Geelong, Sunshine Coast, Gold Coast, Latrobe-Gippsland and Bunbury in non-capital city areas. The top 20 list shows 3 NSW regions, 6 regions from Vic, 5 regions from Qld, 1 SA region and 5 regions from WA.
<a href="/images/2015/06/30/2015-06-22--01--house-approvals-2014-15-financial-year-SA4-regions.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 <img src="/images/2015/06/30/2015-06-22--01--house-approvals-2014-15-financial-year-SA4-regions.jpg" alt="">
Turning to unit approvals, the list highlights the magnitude of approvals in Inner Melbourne with 12,516 approvals so far this financial year.
This region is already seeing a huge volume of new construction and the pipeline just keeps growing.
To put the volume of approvals in perspective, Brisbane Inner City with the second highest number of approvals (5,808) has less than half as many unit approvals as Inner Melbourne.
The Gold Coast is the only non-capital city area listed amongst the top 20 regions for unit approvals. Looking at the state-by-state breakdown there are 6 NSW regions listed, 6 Vic regions, 4 Qld regions, 1 SA region, 2 WA regions and 1 ACT region.
<a href="/images/2015/06/30/2015-06-22--02--unit-approvals-2014-15-financial-year-SA4-regions.jpg" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/30/2015-06-22--02--unit-approvals-2014-15-financial-year-SA4-regions.jpg" alt="">
 
With the pipeline of construction activity remaining high and much of it high-density development, the multiplier effect from heightened construction activity should continue for a number of years. 
Of course the biggest hurdle may start to be achieving necessary presales for these projects commence particularly given that many financial institutions are now starting to tighten their lending practices on the request of APRA. 
With a particular focus on investment mortgages this may have an impact on demand from investors who are seemingly a key driver of the surging demand for inner city units.
Cameron Kusher is RP Data’s senior research analyst. Follow Cameron on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/cmkusher" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

Surge in dwelling approvals: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) released demographic data for the December 2014 quarter yesterday. The data highlighted a continuing slowdown in the rate of national population growth, with the quarterly increase now lower than slump in population growth recorded during the GFC. In particular the mining states and territories are recording the biggest slowdown in population growth fueled by a slowdown in both interstate and overseas migration.
<a href="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-13.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-13.jpg" alt="">
 
The data showed that throughout 2014 Australia added another 330,202 persons.  Although this is still a relatively high rate of population growth, it is the lowest annual increase in population since the population increased by 327,637 persons over the 12 months to September 2011.  Over the final quarter of the year the national population increased by 64,010 persons which was its lowest quarterly increase since June 2006 (52,834).
<a href="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-23.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-23.jpg" alt="">
 
At a national level population growth is comprised of overseas migration (arrivals minus departures) and natural increase (births minus deaths), any interstate migration is neutral at a national level.  Over the past year, the country experienced a natural increase of 146,067 persons and net overseas migration of 184,135 persons.  The rate of annual natural increase is at its lowest level since December 2006 (139,793) and annual net overseas migration is at its lowest level since June 2011 (180,372).  On a quarterly basis, natural increase was recorded at 36,517 persons (its lowest level since December 2006) and net overseas migration was recorded at 46,034 persons (its lowest level since June 2011).
<a href="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-33.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-33.jpg" alt="">
With the national population increasing by 330,202 persons over the past year, the majority of population growth has taken place in the largest states.  NSW (31.2%) and Vic (30.7%) accounted for a combined 61.9% of national population growth.  If you add Qld (19.4%) and WA (12.1%) the four largest states accounted for 93.5% of national population growth over the year.
As far as the rate of population growth goes, for the first time since September 2006 WA is no longer the state with the most rapid rate of population growth with Vic taking over the mantle. Vic’s population increased by 1.8% over the year followed by: WA (1.6%), NSW and Qld (both 1.4%), ACT (1.1%), SA (0.9%), NT (0.4%) and Tas (0.3%).  Qld, WA and NT in particular are seeing the impact of the mining downturn with fewer workers required in these states as the pipeline of major infrastructure projects winds down translating into slower population growth. Two years ago these states were recording annual population growth of 2.0% in Qld, 3.7% in WA and 2.8% in NT.
<a href="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-42.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-42.jpg" alt="">
Net overseas migration has been slowing at a national level and as the above chart shows, all states are experiencing a fall in net overseas migration.  The full brunt of the slowdown in net overseas migration is once again being felt by the resource states.  Annual net overseas migration is -30.9% lower in Qld, -47.6% lower in WA and -56.0% lower in NT.  All other states except for NSW (+1.9%) and ACT (+4.1%) have recorded a fall in net overseas migration over the year, but nowhere near the extent of the mining states and territories.  The declines in these states were recorded at -4.2% in Vic, -9.0% in SA and -2.9% in Tas.  The data also highlights that overseas migrants have a clear preference to settle in the larger states.  Over the past year, 37.9% of net migration occurred in NSW with a further 30.4% in Vic, 13.2% in Qld and 10.3% in WA.
<a href="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-53.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/26/Chart-53.jpg" alt="">
 
At a national level net interstate migration has no impact however, it does have a significant impact across individual states.  Over the 12 months to December 2014, there were 335,256 interstate movements across the Australian states.  Historically Qld has attracted as high number of interstate migrants however; net interstate migration to the state has slowed sharply over recent years.  Across the states, Vic now attracts the most net interstate migrants (9,336) followed by Qld (5,598) and these are the only two states that have recorded a net gain in interstate migration over the year.  Vic’s net gain from interstate migration is a record high while migration to Qld is at its lowest level on record.  The net outflow of residents from the remaining states was recorded at: -5,572 persons in NSW, -2,744 in SA, -400 in WA, -1,278 in Tas, -3,392 in NT and -1,548 in ACT.  Despite the net outflow, the net number of residents leaving NSW is at a record low.  On the other hand the loss of residents from WA is the largest since September 2003 and the outflow from NT is the largest on record.
In terms of natural increase the states with the largest overall populations also have the greatest natural increase.  There has been a sharp decline in natural increase in NSW over the past few years while natural increase is trending higher in WA.  The state-by-state shares of natural increase are: 26.5% in NSW, 24.8% in Vic, 23.5% in Qld, 4.9% in SA, 14.8% in WA, 1.0% in Tas, 2.0% in NT and 2.6% in ACT.
The demographic data highlights challenges for the Australian economy and individual states. Gross domestic product has been slowing and is much lower on a per capita basis. With population growth slowing and set to slow further in coming quarters (as foreshadowed in the monthly overseas arrivals and departures data) this poses a challenge for the national economy.  The resource states in particular are being impacted as they are attracting fewer migrants from both interstate and overseas. Conversely, NSW and Vic (which are a proxy for Sydney and Melbourne) are the places that both domestic and international migrants want to head to. 
This in turn fuels demand for housing, creates the need for more jobs and requires more spending on infrastructure. To-date it doesn’t look as if the sharp rises in home values in Sydney and to a lesser degree Melbourne over recent years is stopping migrants heading to these areas. You would have to think that at some point this will change but no one has a crystal ball to know exactly when that inflection point will occur. Particularly given how low the cost of debt currently is with interest rates so low, furthermore rental pressures are easing given already high new housing construction and a record high pipeline of approvals to potentially follow.
Cameron Kusher is RP Data’s senior research analyst. Follow Cameron on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/cmkusher" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

Australia’s rate of population growth continues to slow: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
Sales data over the 12 months to March 2015 shows that there have been more homes sold across the combined capital cities for less than $200,000 than there have been homes sold for more than $1 million. As you would expect there is a growing proportion of sales in excess of $1 million in Sydney and Melbourne while homes selling for less than $200,000 are almost exclusively found in Hobart and Adelaide.
Over the 12 months to March 2015, a record low 6.1% of capital city home sales were below $200,000 and 31.8%sold for between $200,000 and $400,000, the lowest proportion since the 12 months to October 2001. While we are seeing a decline in sales at the lower price points, predictably more expensive sales are increasing.  Over the 12 months to March 2015, 10.0% of all homes sold across the combined capital cities sold for more than $1 million, a record high. As we will discover the proportion of homes selling in excess of $1 million is substantially higher within cities such as Sydney and Melbourne.
Sydney
<a href="/images/2015/06/25/chart-1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-1.jpg" alt="">
Over the 12 months to March 2015, a record low 8.9% of Sydney houses sold for less than $400,000 compared to a record high 34.0% of houses selling above $1 million.  The remaining 59.2% occurred between $400,000 and $1 million.  For the unit market, a record low 18.6% of sales were below $400,000 whilst there was a record high 71.1% between $400,000 and 1 million and a record 10.3% above $1 million.  The impact of a surge in home values over the past year is being felt at the lower end of the market with a sharp drop in sales below $400,000 for both houses and units over the past year.
Melbourne
<a href="/images/2015/06/25/chart-2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-2.jpg" alt="">
24.5% of Melbourne houses and 36.9% of Melbourne units sold for less than $400,000 over the 12 months to March 2015.  In comparison, 16.5% of houses and 5.1% of units sold for more than $1 million.  For houses, the proportion of sales below $400,000 was at a record low while it was just shy of a record low for units.  Conversely, both houses and units logged a record high proportion of sales over $1 million.  Like Sydney, the impact of the value rises over recent years is being felt most at the lower-end of the housing market with a sharp decline in sales below $400,000.  This is highlighted both by the table above which shows a sharp drop in sales below $400,000 over the past 20 years.  Unlike Sydney, finding more affordable housing options is relatively easier in Melbourne with almost 1 in 4 houses and more than a third of units selling for less than $400,000.
Brisbane
<a href="/images/2015/06/25/chart-3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-3.jpg" alt="">
Across all sales, 30.6% of houses and 52.5% of units transacted in Brisbane over the year to March 2015 sold for less than $400,000.  The proportion of houses sold for less than $400,000 was at a record low while the proportion for units was lower in the middle of last year.  House sales in excess of $1 million were at a record high 5.9% over the past year while the 2.3% of unit sales over $1 million is still a way off the record high 3.1% in early 2011.  Brisbane has seen fairly moderate value growth over recent years however, we are still seeing an erosion in sales at the lower end of the market, albeit the deterioration is moderate compared to Sydney and Melbourne.  10 years ago, almost three quarters of houses and more than 4 out of every 5 unit sales was below $400,000, as the above table shows there has been a marked shift over the past decade to fewer lower priced sales.  Relative to Sydney and Melbourne properties selling for less than $400,000 are much more common across Brisbane.
Adelaide
<a href="/images/2015/06/25/chart-4.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-4.jpg" alt="">
 
 Over the 12 months to March 2015 45.3% of Adelaide houses and 65.9% of units sold for less than $400,000.  The proportion of houses and units sold for less than $400,000 was at a record low over the past 12 months however, lower priced housing stock is much more readily available than across all other mainland capital cities.  While sales at a lower price point are falling, a record high 4.7% of houses sold for more than $1 million over the past year.  For units, 2.6% of all sales were over $1 million which was lower than the 3.5% recorded in mid-2008.  Value growth across Adelaide has been limited since the financial crisis, nevertheless the proportion of homes selling for less than $400,000 has continued to decline.  Adelaide offers much more affordable housing options than all other mainland capital cities.
Perth
<a href="/images/2015/06/25/chart-5.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-5.jpg" alt="">
15.1% of Perth houses and 37.7% of Perth units sold for less than $400,000 over the 12 months to March 2015.  In comparison, 10.8% of Perth houses and 4.2% of units sold for more than $1 million over the past year.  The proportion of houses and units selling for below $400,000 is above the record-low of 14.7% and 36.9% respectively both of which occurred over the past year.  The climb in more affordable sales over recent months is likely to be reflective of the fact that value growth has hit a stand-still in Perth over the past 12 months. Furthermore, new supply of homes is at close to record highs across the city currently.  Perth has recorded one of the strongest capital growth rates over the past decade and as a result there has been a substantial decline in the proportion of homes selling for less than $400,000.  This is highlighted by the fact that 10 years ago 81.7% of Perth houses and 88.0% of units sold for less than $400,000. In fact, Perth currently has fewer house sales below $400,000 than all capital cities except for Sydney and Canberra.
Hobart
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-6.jpg" alt="">
 
Hobart is the nation’s most affordable capital city and also sees an overwhelmingly larger proportion of lower priced house and unit sales.  Over the 12 months to March 2015, 61.4% of Hobart houses and 82.0% of units sold for less than $400,000.  Hobart is the only capital city in which a majority of houses have sold for less than $400,000 over the past year.  Subsequently, relatively few homes sell for over $1 million with just 1.5% of all house sales and 1.7% of unit sales over that price point.  Hobart’s housing market has seen very little growth in home values over the past 10 years yet there has still been a fairly substantial decline in house sales below $400,000 while unit sales below $400,000 have seen little change.    10 years ago, 86.9% of all house sales were less than $400,000 and 88.5% of unit sales sat within that price point.
Darwin
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-7.jpg" alt="">
Darwin has recorded the strongest value growth of all capital cities over the past decade; as a result it has shifted from being one of the most affordable capital cities to now being one of the most expensive.  Over the 12 months to March 2015, 20.8% of houses and 28.8% of units sold for less than $400,000.  Alternatively, 6.3% of houses and 4.8% of units in the city sold for more than $1 million.  The proportion of houses selling for less than $400,000 has started to trend higher over recent months as values have fallen while unit sales below $400,000 are at a record low.  The proportion of sales above $1 million is below its record high for houses and units with the record high coming for houses over the past year and in late 2010 for units.  With value growth in Darwin the strongest of all capital cities over the past decade, the decline in the availability of more affordable housing is clear.  Around 1 in 5 house sales nowadays are below $400,000 compared to 9 out of 10 a decade ago.  For units, just over 1 in 4 sales nowadays are below $400,000 compared to more than 9 in 10 a decade ago.
Canberra
<img src="/images/2015/06/25/chart-8.jpg" alt="">
 
Over the 12 months to March 2015, 7.8% of Canberra houses and 42.3% of Canberra units sold for less than $400,000.  On the other hand, 5.9% of house sales and 2.4% of unit sales were for more than $1 million over the year. The proportion of houses selling for less than $400,000 is currently at a record low while unit sales below $400,000 reached their low point throughout the past year at 39.7%.  The number of houses selling over $1 million is below its peak of 6.2% a couple of months earlier, as are unit sales at this price point.  Although home value growth in Canberra has been moderate over the past 5 years, there’s been a fairly substantial fall in sales below $400,000 over that time.  5 years ago, 23.2% of Canberra houses and 56.7% of units were sold for less than $400,000.
The data shows that whether you look at interest rates, household incomes or any other factor that can influence affordability; we have seen a sharp decline in homes selling at a lower price point in over the past decade.  Of course, even a home priced at $400,000 won’t be cheap enough for some potential home buyers.  It is to be expected that the cost of housing rises over time however, there are social issues surrounding the sharp decline in lower priced homes.  The result is that more people have to choose to rent or alternatively they have to move away from our capital cities or to smaller capital cities.  Of course, finding employment in smaller capital cities and regional markets can be more difficult.
Anecdotally we are also hearing that in markets such as Sydney and Melbourne first time buyers are purchasing investment properties rather than owner occupied properties for their first home.  We also hear that a number are purchasing investment properties outside of these two cities where you can seemingly get better value for money.  Of course, in most markets outside of Sydney and Melbourne the economies are currently weaker and capital growth has been much more moderate.
Housing affordability is a very individualistic issue however; the data contained here shows that housing at a lower price is becoming much harder to come by, particularly in our larger capital cities.
Cameron Kusher is RP Data’s senior research analyst. Follow Cameron on Twitter <a href="https://twitter.com/cmkusher" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

1 in 10 capital city home sales over $1 million: Cameron Kusher

Malaysian developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> is the latest to jump into St Leonards booming Transport Oriented Development precinct.

The developer, which has previously delivered Sapphire by the Gardens apartment development in Melbourne, identified the Atchison Street site in 2023. It filed a Scoping Report around 12 months ago, and now has revealed the designs for the new&nbsp;40-storey mixed-use tower.

The State Significant Development Application covers <a href="https://next-portal.urban.com.au/projects/14650/summary">20-22 Atchison Street</a>, a 1,374 sqm site positioned between St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the project would deliver 181 apartments, above a four-storey commercial podium, five basement levels, and new public domain works along Mitchell Street. The apartment mix comprises 35 one-bedroom apartments, 39 one-bedroom-plus-study apartments, 85 two-bedroom apartments, and 22 three-bedroom residences.

The proposal has been lodged as a shop-top housing development under the NSW Government’s TOD planning pathway, which allows increased density around key transport infrastructure. The site sits within the recently rezoned Crows Nest Accelerated TOD Precinct.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b799673d-48e2-46b0-801a-0e33a9330100" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20site.png?VersionId=dPh0UfwfaHpbFL1R7H1cbZNbIW0CHbCC" />

SP Setia acquired the Atchison Street site as part of its continued expansion into the Australian apartment market. In comments made to City &amp; Country (The Edge Malaysia) in 2023, SP Setia President and CEO Datuk Choong Kai Wai described the acquisition as “a strategic move” aligned with the group’s post-pandemic market recovery strategy.

“Our target for this exceptional development is local and overseas buyers, including first-home buyers, downsizers and investors,” Choong said.

The tower has been designed as a slender vertical form rising from a mixed-use podium, with COX Architecture positioning the development as a response to the evolving St Leonards and Crows Nest skyline.

“The purpose of the project is to facilitate the delivery of high-quality housing at a strategically located site and deliver a built tower outcome that is consistent with the desired future character of St Leonards and aligns with the TOD controls,” the design report stated.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b1a85eee-76f7-436c-a6da-73ba827b9b13" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/atchinson%20entry.png?VersionId=dA9jHGPMcm.dDbwk4QfxqWiY5bfh3UVt" />

The podium would incorporate retail uses fronting Atchison Street, commercial tenancies, landscaped communal areas, and pedestrian improvements along Mitchell Street. Vehicle access and loading would be consolidated via Atchison Lane.

Residents would have access to more than 665 sqm of communal indoor and outdoor spaces, while the development proposes 96 parking spaces across five basement levels.

The proposal also includes a commitment for 10 per cent of residential floor space to be allocated toward affordable housing through a monetary contribution.

COX said the tower form responds directly to the emerging high-density character of the precinct while seeking to maximise solar access, cross ventilation, and outlook from apartments.

<img alt="First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2163f85c-f63b-4be3-aafa-f8763976cec5" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Article%20Feature%20Image%20%28Grid%29_5.png?VersionId=WiAmtIKJ6.ZQ41EtYEQ1fol7AeorKBlL" />

“The building is orientated towards north,” the Apartment Design Guide compliance report noted, adding that the tower’s slim form was driven by the constrained inner-urban site dimensions.

The design also incorporates landscaped setbacks and communal open space at podium level, intended to soften the interface with surrounding streets and improve pedestrian amenity.

The project adds to a growing wave of redevelopment proposals reshaping St Leonards and Crows Nest following the opening of the Sydney Metro City line and the NSW Government’s push for higher-density housing around major transport nodes.

Last week Stockland filed plans just down the road. They want to build a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/601-pacific-highway-st-leonards-nsw-2065">52-storey tower on Pacific Highway</a>.

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">First look: Stockland plans 52-storey, 538-apartment St Leonards tower&nbsp;</a>

Joel Robinson

First look: SP Setia targets St Leonards skyline with 40-storey TOD tower

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Cameron Kusher

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News