<p>Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.</p>

<p>Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;</p>

<p>David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;</p>

<p>“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]</p>

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

<p>Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;</p>

<p>At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.</p>

<p>Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.</p>

<p>Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]</p>

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

<p>Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.</p>

<p>David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.</p>

<p>“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;</p>

<p>Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]</p>

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

<p>While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;</p>

<p>Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;</p>

<p>However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.</p>

<p>Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;</p>


Joel Robinson

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<p><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.</p>

<p>The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.</p>

<p>Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.</p>

<p>“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.</p>

<p>“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”</p>

<p><img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" /></p>

<p>Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.</p>

<p>The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.</p>

<p>“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.</p>

<p>“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”</p>

<p><img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" /></p>

<p>Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.</p>

<p>“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.</p>

<p>The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.</p>

<p>“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”</p>

<p>The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.</p>

<p>The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.</p>


Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

<p>Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.</p>

<p>Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.</p>

<p>The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.</p>

<p>“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.</p>

<p>“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.</p>

<p>“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”</p>

<p>The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.</p>

<p>“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”</p>

<p>From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.</p>

<p>“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”</p>

<p>The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.</p>

<p>“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.</p>

<p>Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.</p>

<p>“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.</p>

<p>“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”</p>

<p>The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.</p>

<p>“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.</p>

<p>Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>


Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

<p>Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.</p>

<p>The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.</p>

<p>It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.</p>

<p>With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.</p>

<p>“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.</p>

<p>“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”</p>

<p><img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" /></p>

<p>GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.</p>

<p>“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”</p>

<p>Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.</p>

<p>“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.</p>

<p><img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" /></p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.</p>

<p>Green praised local policy settings.</p>

<p>“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”</p>

<p>One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.</p>

<p>“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.</p>


One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

<p>It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.</p>

<p>Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.</p>

<p>Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be</p>

<p data-end="683" data-start="511">"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.</p>

<p data-end="882" data-start="690">"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."</p>

<p data-end="882" data-start="690">[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]</p>

<p>The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.</p>

<p>The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.</p>

<p>Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]</p>

<p>Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.</p>

<p>The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]</p>

<p data-end="247" data-is-last-node="" data-is-only-node="" data-start="0">While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.</p>

<p>WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.</p>

<p>With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.</p>

<p>[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]</p>


WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

Taxation

<html><body>
<p><img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/57114/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1"></p>
<p>GUEST OBSERVER</p>
<p>The government is still consulting on superannuation after concerns raised by backbenchers over changes made in the budget. However these changes are more important than ever, as evidenced by the 2016 HILDA statistics on wealth and superannuation.</p>
<p>The statistics highlighted changes in the distribution of wealth of Australians since the survey commenced in 2001. The most significant assets held by most Australians continue to be their family residence and superannuation, but policy changes over the time of decade the survey have changed the balance of those investments.</p>
<p>More concerning is the finding that wealth inequality has increased. The data adds strength to the argument that superannuation reforms are overdue, with a small number of wealthy people able to accumulate wealth in superannuation and investment property.</p>
<p>In Chapter 5 of the report, which discusses household wealth, the authors note that superannuation will soon overtake the family home as the major asset owned by Australians. This is the result of two separate trends: increases in superannuation balances and lower net wealth in housing.</p>
<p>Looking at the HILDA data, it’s not unexpected to see that younger age cohorts have experienced the strongest growth in superannuation assets.</p>
<p>Prior to 1993 superannuation was very different to the current system. According to Treasury data in 1986 53.5 percent of Australian full time employees did not have superannuation coverage, and over 80% of those who did, were members of a defined benefit scheme, which would not generally be reported as an asset. By 2000, 96.9% of full time employees had superannuation coverage, with 86% of those employees in accumulation type funds.</p>
<p>The superannuation guarantee has been a significant contributing factor in the importance of superannuation as a household asset. Notably, the phasing in of the rate of the superannuation guarantee shows in account balances. As can be seen from the HILDA report the increased rate of superannuation guarantee after 2002 has resulted in higher superannuation balances for people at the same age in successive surveys.</p>
<p>The increase in housing values is the second trend which has altered the mix of assets. Over this time residential house prices rose significantly, with ABS data showing an increase in the Residential Property Price Index across eight capital cities from 69.0 in September 2003 to 120.2 in Dec 2014.</p>
<p>Given that in the 2002 data the major asset of Australians was the family home, homeowners benefited disproportionately from the increased value of housing. Even with the significant increases in superannuation, for older Australians the proportion of wealth held in housing has been maintained as their total wealth has increased.</p>
<p>However for younger age groups the story is not as positive. The rate of home ownership is declining as it is becoming more difficult to enter the housing market and home equity is declining among younger age groups as the value of loans has increased.</p>
<p>The HILDA data shows that most age cohorts, including all except the oldest retirees, have seen increases in their superannuation accounts over time. Policy changes effective from 2007 have supported superannuants through tax exemptions and high contribution levels.</p>
<p>Another trend contibuting to this is that people are retiring later. The change in the pension age to 67 has been accompanied by a trend for people to work longer. Not only are they deferring withdrawals from their superannuation fund, but they are also continuing to contribute during this time.</p>
<p>As noted in the Productivity Commission report last year there is some evidence of withdrawals at the time of retirement, but these are generally used to pay outstanding debts, including mortgages against the family home.</p>
<p>Others convert their superannuation at retirement into other financial investments. This cements the family home as the most significant asset held by retirees.</p>
<p>The more concerning finding for policy makers is that wealth inequality has increased, and that superannuation holdings and investment properties are factors in this inequality. HILDA data shows that in 2014 the mean superannuation balance of the top 10% of people aged 50 to 69 was $991,268, up from $650,619 in 2002, compared to $210,798 in 2014 for the sixth to ninth decile and $13,719 for the bottom 50% (although a significant number of retirees in this age group do not have any superannuation balance).</p>
<p>There is a strong correlation between high superannuation balances, income and non-superannuation wealth. People in the top decile have access to higher levels of income to make higher levels of concessional contributions, and the ability to find the funds to make non-concessional contributions into a tax preferred investment environment.</p>
<p>As has been noted previously, the current superannuation system allows high income and high wealth individuals to over-accumulate in tax preferred superannuation, which increases wealth inequality as well as intergenerational inequality.</p>
<p>The Government proposals to restrict the level of contributions and to reduce the amount that can be retained in a tax free environment are important tools to address increasing levels of wealth inequality in our community.</p>
<p><em><span class="fn author-name">Helen Hodgson is </span>associate professor, Curtin Law School and Curtin Business School, Curtin University and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/helen-hodgson-94553" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Wealth inequality shows superannuation changes are overdue

<html><body>
<div>It's the end of financial year!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It was a really strong finish to the year for share markets today, closing up by 1.8 percent. However, the Aussie stock markets finished the financial year down by an underwhelming 4.1 percent.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>With the tax year now having come to an end, it will soon be time to lodge those tax returns.  </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Holiday homes under scrutiny this year</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>Last year, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) designed and implemented new compliance strategies for foreign investors in Australian property, including stakeholder engagement (with advisers, agents, and associations), improved data matching, and a broad investigation strategy into illegal foreign purchases.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This year - as well as those claiming excessive work-related expenses such as travel expenses, self-education, uniform, mobile phone, and internet costs – it is resident Australians with rental properties that are more likely to be under scrutiny from the ATO at tax time - in particular those will holiday homes.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>During the past year ATO Commissioners have advised Farifax Media and SBS News that they have been in contact with thousands of owners of rental properties in order to clarify their entitlements or request clarification about claims that they've made. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The ATO has further reportedly sent correspondence to some holiday home owners recommending that they "review the nature of their claims" before dropping in their next returns...oops!<br><br>
</div>
<div>With well over 2 million Australians lodging tax returns declaring ownership of a rental property - spread widely across all income brackets – the landlord sector is substantial, and there are potentially significant liabilities to be raised by the ATO.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Click to enlarge</div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/ATO1.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Owners of holiday homes should take a good deal of care not to make claims for net rental losses for periods when their property has not actually been made available for rent. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>In particular owners of holiday homes claiming deductions for a full year when the property has been vacant for long periods might expect to get a tap on the shoulder from the tax office.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>According to ATO legislation the principles that apply to a rental property also apply to a holiday home if it is rented out - if you rent out your holiday home, you can claim expenses for the property based on the proportion of the income year it was rented out or was genuinely available for rent.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>However, if a holiday home is advertised in ways that limit its exposure to potential tenants, then the property may not be deemed “genuinely available” for rent – for example, if the property is not widely advertised, or if the advertised rents are set at unrealistically high levels.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Since the ATO’s interest was flagged some months ago, net rental losses declared or claimed on holiday homes could be lower this year as this loophole is sewn up...</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Airbnb </em>and online networks</span></strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>There may also be some confusion relating to the rise of online networks such as <em>Airbnb</em>, with more Australians than ever before choosing to rent out their own homes, or a part of their homes. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Remember, rental income is assessable and therefore you may have tax to pay at year end - don't try to be sneaky and under-report rental income it or you may be penalised! </div>
<div> </div>
<div>For <em>Airbnb</em> hosts there are two types of allowable deductions. Firstly, there are costs directly associated with generating rental income or with the rental area (for eaxample, photography, commercial cleaning costs, food for tenants, <em>Airbnb</em> fees and commissions, or food made available to tenants). </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And secondly there are costs which may be apportioned, often based upon the applicable floor area, including your mortgage or rent, utilities, internet and phone costs, insurance, and so on.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Keep records and receipts through the financial year and make sure you set aside some money for the tax liability!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also, be aware of the potential legal and liability risks or short term tenancies and other tax implications thereof, such as capital gains tax (the principal place of residence is normally exempt, but generating rental income from the home may trigger a change in this status).  </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Repairs and maintenance</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>There is also often genuine confusion for some property investors over what deductions can be claimed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Perhaps the most common mistake made by landlords on lodged tax returns is claiming deductions for repairs and maintenance for expenses which are actually capital costs. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Property investors are not allowed to claim repairs and maintenance deductions for defects or pre-existing damage that was in evidence at the time they acquired the property. Such improvements are considered to be capital in nature.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Where investors are unsure they would be well advised to check the rules relating to deductions made available by the ATO for free online, or to engage a tax agent or property specialist tax accountant that is familiar with the rules. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Net rental losses declining</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>Declared net rental losses have declined sharply in recent times, falling by more than half over the last two tax years for which data is available, largely due to lower interest rates. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The average net loss claimed by investors has fallen by 64 per cent since 2008 as mortgage repayments have become cheaper. These figures will continue to decline in 2015 and 2016 with interest rates having fallen.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2016/07/01/NG.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/NG.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>While the ATO will doubtless generally be looking for expenses claimed in error as part of their investigative reviews or audits, it is worth noting that many investors also fail to claim deductions which they are entitled to. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2016/07/01/NG2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/NG2.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>In particular, not all owners of rental properties are aware of the potentially generous capital allowances and tax depreciation deductions for plant and equipment which are available under the tax legislation.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you are in doubt, a property specialist tax accountant can help you to avoid making costly mistakes!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<p><span><em>PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>.</em><br></span></p>
<p><em>His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.</em></p>
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Tips and traps for property investors: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
<p>Taxing foreign buyers, rather than any new hand outs to first home buyers was the focus of the NSW State Government budget.</p>
<p>Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian said she wanted to be cautious when dealing with the property market.</p>
<p>The State Government is not tipping any Sydney property market correction, just a likely easing.</p>
<p>The state budget didn't raise or lower property taxes, other than the much anticipated new taxes on foreign investors.</p>
<p>All foreign property investors in NSW will be hit with a 4 percent stamp duty surcharge when buying homes and apartments and face an ongoing extra 0.75 per cent land tax surcharge on their residential property holdings.</p>
<p>Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian said she was confident the extra costs would not deter foreign buyers given other states had similiar measure.</p>
<p>"Economists say it is an inelastic market," she said, when asked if there could be any fallout.</p>
<p>The NSW Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian's second state budget anticipates a slowing in stamp duty revenues from home sales.</p>
<p>But they will still get $8,777 million in the next financial year, then $9,124 million in 2017-2018.</p>
<p>"I don't apologise for be very cautious when it comes to the property market," she said.</p>
<p>Residential transfer duties are tipped to rise at 4.4 percent annually over the next four years, "significantly more subdued than the pace see in recent years."</p>
<p>There was 13.6 percent growth in the current budget year, and a stunning 40 percent growth when the boom was its most robust in 2013.</p>
<p>The NSW State Budget officially revealed an extra $835 million extra stamp duty purchasing revenue will come from foreign buyers over the next four years.</p>
<p>It also expects $166 million is over the next four years from land tax on foreign investors.</p>
<p>NSW land tax revenues are forecast to rise at a faster rate than stamp duty revenues.</p>
<p>Land tax on investors will yield 8.1 percent higher revenue every year for the next four years, taking revenues from $3,136 million this year to $3,761 million in 2019-20..</p>
<p>The housing boom longevity is not being assumed by the NSW Treasury who suggest price growth was "moderating."</p>
<p>Transfer duty represents 29% of state government revenue. Land tax represents 11%.</p>
<p>The budget papers noted there was potential downside risk of a decline in the broader housing market.</p>
<p>On the upside was "the impact of low, and possibly even lower interest rates leading to stronger housing construction and consumer spending," the budget papers advised.  </p>
<p>There was no change to NSW first home buyer grants in the state budget with the January 2016 reduction from $15,000 to $10,000 triggering a smaller govenment outlay.</p>
<p>Just $96 million was spent on the first home new home scheme this year, down on the $115 million in the 2014-15 year. The first home exemptions and concessions are estimated to sit at $88 million next financial year.</p>
<p>"We are doing every thing we can for first home buyers," Berejiklian said.</p>
<p>"The key thing is to continue to focus on supply," she added noting that there had been record levels of 70,000 new homes in the year to April.</p>
<p>"We are spending on infrastructure in local areas conducive to housing." </p>
<p>She anticipated any glut in apartment numbers would contribute to housing affordability by putting "downward pressure on prices." </p>
<p>"I appreciate the challenges people go through to get into the market."</p>
<p>She also signalled her concern at the Federal Labor's negative gearing tax policy. </p>
<p>"Without being over dramatic I am concerned that the election of a Shorten government will jeopardise conditions in NSW," she said.</p>
</body></html>

Taxing foreign buyers the focus of the NSW State Government budget

<html><body>
<p><img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/57114/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1"></p>
<p>GUEST OBSERVER</p>
<p>Opposition Leader Bill Shorten told Q&amp;A viewers that the federal government spends more on negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts than it does on child care or higher education.</p>
<p>Is that right?</p>
<h2>Checking the source</h2>
<p>When asked for sources to support Shorten’s statement, an ALP spokesperson said the Grattan Institute has estimated the cost of the capital gains tax and negative gearing concessions at $11.7 billion per year.</p>
<p><em>The Treasury’s tax expenditure statement (TES) lists the cost of the capital gains tax discount as $6.15b for 2015-16. The TES does not list the cost of negative gearing, but using Grattan’s total figure and subtracting the value of the capital gains tax discount, this shows that the cost of negative gearing is around $5.5 billion… this cost exceeds the cost of child care assistance or university education as per the budget papers.</em></p>
<p>You can read the longer response <a href="https://theconversation.com/full-response-from-labor-spokesperson-61201" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>So, does federal government spending on child care or higher education outstrip the cost of revenue forgone due to negative gearing and capital gains tax (CGT)?</p>
<h2>How much does the government spend on child care subsidies?</h2>
<p>This year’s budget showed the federal government is estimated to spend about $8.2 billion on child care fee assistance in 2016-17. That’s comprised of about $4.2 billion for the child care benefit and about $3.9 billion for the child care rebate.</p>
<p><a href="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160614-17209-1gramrh.png" target="_blank"><span class="attribution">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p><span class="attribution"><img src="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160614-17209-1gramrh.png" alt=""></span></p>
<p><span class="attribution">Budget Paper 1, 2016-17 Federal Budget.</span></p>
<p>Here’s a graph produced by the Parliamentary Budget Office showing how the cost of child care subsidies is projected to change over time.</p>
<p><a href="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160614-29225-1v45yz.png" target="_blank"><span class="attribution">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p><span class="attribution"><img src="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160614-29225-1v45yz.png" alt=""></span></p>
<p><span class="attribution"><a class="source" href="https://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Budget_Office/Chart_packs">Parliamentary Budget Office</a></span></p>
<div class="enlarge_hint"> </div>
<h2>How much does the government spend on higher education?</h2>
<p>This year’s budget shows that the federal government is estimated to spend about $9.5 billion on higher education in 2016-17, an amount which is fairly stable over the forward estimates period. It is projected to be about $9.4 billion by 2019-20.</p>
<p><a href="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22416-5uy7q4.png" target="_blank"><span class="attribution">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p><span class="attribution"><img src="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22416-5uy7q4.png" alt=""></span></p>
<p><span class="attribution">Budget paper 1, 2016-17 federal budget.</span></p>
<p>Here’s a graph produced by the Parliamentary Budget Office showing how the cost of higher education expenses is projected to change over time.</p>
<p><a href="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22411-1qzpsjt.png" target="_blank"><span class="attribution">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p><img src="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22411-1qzpsjt.png" alt=""></p>
<p><span class="attribution">Parliamentary Budget Office</span></p>
<h2>How much do negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions cost the government in revenue forgone?</h2>
<p><strong>Capital gains tax:</strong> As Labor’s spokesperson says, the Treasury’s 2015 tax expenditure statement (TES) lists the cost of the capital gains tax discount as $6.15 billion for 2015-16.</p>
<p>According to Treasury’s estimates of tax expenditures, the “cost” associated with the capital gains tax discount for individuals and trusts is estimated to be $6.8 billion in 2016-17, rising to $9.09 billion in 2019-20. Note that this estimate does not include any estimate for the concessional treatment of owner-occupied housing.</p>
<p><a href="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22398-cw74xm.png" target="_blank"><span class="attribution">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p><span class="attribution"><img src="/images/2016/06/21/image-20160615-22398-cw74xm.png" alt=""></span></p>
<p><span class="attribution">Budget Paper 1, 2016-17 federal budget.</span></p>
<p><strong>Negative gearing:</strong> This is where it gets tricky. Treasury does not regard negative gearing as a “tax expenditure” and thus does not provide any estimates for the “revenue foregone” as a result of it. So we have to look at other sources for estimates.</p>
<p>Labor has inferred from the Grattan Institute’s report that the cost of negative gearing is around $5.5 billion ($11.7 billion minus the $6.15 billion cost of the CGT discount).</p>
<p>Labor did not provide The Conversation with any Parliamentary Budget Office (PBO) estimates on the cost of negative gearing to The Conversation. Labor’s spokesman said only that the PBO estimated Labor’s plan to restrict negative gearing to new property and to halve the capital gains tax discount could raise $565 million over the forward estimates.</p>
<p>The Greens put the cost of negative gearing at somewhere around $4 billion a year.</p>
<p>A 2015 report by The Australia Institute said that modelling by National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM) estimated that:</p>
<p><em>negative gearing of residential investment property is currently reducing tax revenue by $3.7 billion per year.</em></p>
<p>Ben Phillips, Associate Professor at the ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods (who previously conducted the NATSEM modelling quoted by The Australia Institute), reported in February 2016 that:</p>
<p><em>We estimate that in 2017-18 the total tax savings from negatively gearing properties is $4.3 billion.</em></p>
<p>And I have previously estimated that negative gearing costs more than $5 billion per annum in revenue forgone – although that estimate was for the 2010-11 financial year when interest rates were considerably higher than they are today. It was also a “gross” figure that did not allow for the impact of interest expenses being carried forward to be offset against future capital gains tax liabilities.</p>
<p>So what’s the combined cost of negative gearing and CGT? Nobody knows for sure. It could be as high as $11.7 billion, as the Grattan Institute has <a href="https://grattan.edu.au/report/hot-property/">said</a>. It could also be lower.</p>
<h2>So does CGT and negative gearing cost more than child care or higher education?</h2>
<p>This year’s budget showed the federal government is estimated to spend about $8.2 billion on child care fee assistance and about $9.5 billion on higher education in 2016-17.</p>
<p>Using the estimates outlined above, the combined annual effective cost of negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts to the public purse in revenue foregone is somewhere between about $9 billion and $11.7 billion (although no-one knows for sure because of differing opinions on the cost of negative gearing).</p>
<p>So Shorten’s statement that Australia is “spending more at the Commonwealth level on negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts than we are on child care or higher education” is likely to be somewhere in the ball park – but it’s impossible to say conclusively.</p>
<h2>A word of caution</h2>
<p>It’s worth remembering that none of the major parties are advocating scrapping negative gearing altogether.</p>
<p>And finally, it is worth drawing attention to Treasury’s caution that its estimates of tax expenditures such as the capital gains tax discount assume that taxpayer behaviour is unaffected by the existence of the concessional tax treatment. That assumption that may not be valid in practice, so that these estimates:</p>
<p><em>do not indicate the revenue gain to the budget if specific tax expenditures were to be abolished…. care needs to be taken when comparing tax expenditures with direct expenditures as they may measure different things.</em></p>
<h2>Verdict</h2>
<p>Is Australia “spending more at the Commonwealth level on negative gearing and capital gains tax discounts than we are on child care or higher education”?</p>
<p>Nobody knows for sure, because of the difficulty in measuring exactly how much negative gearing tax breaks cost the federal government every year in revenue foregone. (Treasury cautions against comparing tax expenditures with direct expenditures as they may measure different things.)</p>
<p>Using available estimates, however, Bill Shorten’s statement is probably in the ballpark.</p>
<h2>Review</h2>
<p>I agree with this assessment of the statement. There are official estimates on the projected spending on childcare, education and the revenue foregone in relation to the capital gains tax discount, although as Treasury notes these figures may not be directly comparable. It is more difficult to estimate the foregone revenue in relation to negative gearing as there are no official estimates. Each model will come up with a different estimate based on the parameters used for the estimate.</p>
<p>I would also caution that the statement by Bill Shorten should be read in conjunction with proposed ALP policies in these areas. In particular, tax concessions on negative gearing and the CGT discount will be pared back but negative gearing will still be available to taxpayers currently holding investment properties, and the CGT discount will be halved but not removed.</p>
<p>Given the difficulties in identifying the cost of negative gearing and the problems inherent in comparing data measured differently, the statement is within reasonable estimates.<strong> – Helen Hodgson</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><em><span class="fn author-name">Saul Eslake is v</span>ice-chancellor’s fellow, University of Tasmania and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/saul-eslake-665" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><em><span class="fn author-name">Helen Hodgson is a</span>ssociate professor, Curtin Law School and Curtin Business School, Curtin University and author for The Conversation. She can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/helen-hodgson-94553" target="_blank">here</a>.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
</body></html>

What’s the combined cost of negative gearing and CGT? Saul Eslake

<html><body>
<p>New stamp duty and land tax surcharges imposed on foreign buyers of residential property in NSW, Victoria and Queensland could have repercussions for Frasers Property Australia.</p>
<p>Its boss Rod Fehring has noted they might affect all foreign-owned property owners and developers operating in Australia, including Frasers Property Australia, the former ASX-listed Australand business, which is now wholly owned by Singapore-listed and Thai-controlled Frasers Centrepoint.</p>
<p>In NSW, foreign buyers will be hit with a 4 percent stamp duty surcharge from June 21 and 0.75 percent land tax surcharge starting in 2017.</p>
<p>Queensland's 3 percent stamp duty surcharge commneces on October 1.</p>
<p>Both are following Victoria which will raise its existing 3 percent stamp duty surcharge and 0.5 percent land tax surcharge to 7 percent and 1.5 percent respectively on July 1.</p>
<p>Developers can apply for exemptions in Victoria, but these are at the discretion of Treasurer Tim Pallas to be deemed resident or non-resident.</p>
<p>The treasurers in NSW and Queensland are yet to announce any exemptions.</p>
</body></html>

Frasers caught in wave of property taxes for property

<html><body>
<p>SPONSORED POST</p>
<p>If you have bought an off-the-plan property, assessing that property post construction is an important part of the settlement process.</p>
<p>Of course, you want to ensure that the property you agreed to purchase is the same that is being delivered so that you’re getting what you’re paying for!</p>
<p>The most cost effective way to make sure your property is delivered just as your purchase contract promised, is to have your contract documentation reviewed and the property physically inspected and assessed by an appropriately qualified Building Consultant.</p>
<p>An NBtax Condition Assessment, completed by a Napier &amp; Blakeley Building Consultant will take note of the ‘as built finish’ of your property. From our initial review of purchase documentation, contract of sale, agreed finishes and specifications, we have a unique understanding of what was agreed to be built.</p>
<p>We will inspect your property on your behalf, asses and document the condition of the finishes within the property, good or bad.</p>
<p>Following an inspection a Condition Assessment will be completed by NBtax and will provide a concise summary of the condition of the property. It will list defects that the developer and or builder should address to deliver the property that is consistent with expectations, including but not always limited to, the agreed plans and specifications, good building practice and expected industry standard.</p>
<p>Our assessment will give you a clear understanding of any potential issues or defects before you take possession, move in or put the property up for lease.  It also gives you peace of mind, providing you with a document that will ensure agreed items between you, the purchaser, and the vendor are installed or rectified prior to settlement.</p>
<p>The best time to have a Condition Assessment completed is as close as possible to the planned settlement date. It is important to note that you still have a contractual obligation to settle your purchase on time. However, under normal circumstances having a condition assessment completed on your property will make you a more informed purchaser and provide you with a written report to enable you to highlight to the developers identifying items requiring attention.</p>
<p>This service is especially valuable to those offshore purchasers who are not present at the time of settlement. We are able to act on their behalf during settlement inspections to ensure relevant conditions are met within the sale contract.</p>
<p>Our specialised teams are ready to help, contact us today.</p>
<p><em>For more information, <a href="https://nbtax.com.au/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Be sure to get what you paid for!

<html><body>
<p>SPONSORED POST</p>
<p>Australia definitely is the place to be right now. Pretty much every state and territory in Australia appears to be enjoying steady property growth.</p>
<p>The apartment market is rising and developments are selling out before they’re even built. The low density residential markets in the middle and outer suburbs too are enjoying solid growth.</p>
<p>With property doing well in Australia, you’d think it’s the perfect time to buy, but it’s proving to be probably the hardest it has ever been for first time Aussie investors to enter the market. Banks are asking for bigger deposits, interest rates are on the down turn, and first home buyer grants are only for those first time buyers that want to live in their homes. The question many of us ask is; “Is the government doing anything to help first time investors in Australia?” </p>
<p>The answer is yes, and they did it 3 decades ago. The introduction of negative gearing and the golden gem that is Property Tax Depreciation, gives investors the chance to reduce the after tax cost of their investment, increase their cash flow all while having a property asset appreciate.</p>
<p>Property Tax Depreciation can be an excellent way to make negative gearing work in your favour. Current interest rates, and a competitive rental market make it very easy for a negatively geared investment to become positive. Positive is good – except for the additional burden of a tax bill!</p>
<p>Understanding your property investment, and the cost of it before you buy is prudent, and knowing the available property tax depreciation can, if anything boost your potential buying power. That extra $10-15k of deductions can make a huge difference in the property game.</p>
<p>Knowing how property tax depreciation works is pivotal when making your first property investment, or any property investment for that matter. As property tax depreciation diminishes over time, the older the property, the less property tax depreciation there is going to be available. One might say it’s always wiser to purchase newer property – this ensures you’ll be able to claim the maximum available property tax deprecation, putting more in your pocket during the life of your investment.</p>
<p>So you’ve bought your investment? Then we come to the harder part – who do we trust? Who do we go to, to ensure we have a maximised property tax depreciation schedule?</p>
<p>In the eighties when residential property tax depreciation was introduced to the Australian taxation system, there was only one company that people turned to; <strong>Napier &amp; Blakeley.</strong></p>
<p>Napier &amp; Blakeley were the first professional company to provide residential property tax depreciation advice, and over three decades on, they’re still the market leaders and still providing that same trustworthy advice through NBtax. NBtax is a division within Napier &amp; Blakeley that concentrates purely on the residential property depreciation market.   </p>
<p>With tax time so near, if you’ve purchased an investment property in the past year, make sure you’re prepared with a property tax depreciation schedule that’s best for you.</p>
<p><em>For more information, <a href="https://nbtax.com.au" target="_blank">click here</a>.</em></p>
</body></html>

Making your first property investment possible

<html><body>
<p><span lang="EN-AU">Australians have forked out an estimated $47.6 billion in ‘lazy tax’ over the past 10 years by keeping their mortgage with the Big Four banks rather than switching to one of the lowest rates in the market.</span> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">That’s an estimated $14,215 for a borrower with the typical $300,000 mortgage, or $23,692 for borrowers with a $500,000 loan.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">Sally Tindall, money editor at <a href="https://www.ratecity.com.au/home-loans" target="_blank">RateCity.com.au</a>, said borrowers shouldn’t set and forget about their home loans.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">“Australians, traditionally, haven’t been big switchers but when they do, they are saving thousands of dollars,” she said.</span> </p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">“It’s not difficult to find an interest rate starting with a three, and it’s not uncommon to find rates starting with five, so the variation between rates is huge in dollar terms.</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU">“People need to start thinking about the rate they are paying and factoring that into their bottom line when they take out a loan.”</span></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><a href="/images/2016/06/06/image002.jpg" target="_blank"><span lang="EN-AU">Click to enlarge</span></a></p>
<p class="x_MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-AU"><img src="/images/2016/06/06/image002.jpg" alt=""> </span></p>
</body></html>

Switching makes dollars and sense: Ratecity

<html><body>
<p class="p1">Bill Shorten and Labor are promising to perform a mathematical miracle in the real estate industry: they have a policy under which prices will keep rising but affordability will improve.</p>
<p class="p1">Labor justified its real estate taxation policy with the claimed desire to improve housing affordability. Shorten in his policy announcement essentially blamed all price rises over the past 30 years on negatively-geared investors and inferred that nobbling them would revolutionise affordability.</p>
<p class="p1">This has scared the living daylights out Australians who live in the 70 percent of households which own their homes. Labor was promising to reduce the value of their major asset.</p>
<p class="p1">Since Labor realised the fundamental flaw in its policy pitch, it has been at pains to claim that property values won’t fall under its changes. The ALP-aligned think tank, The McKell Institute, is now saying that house prices will keep rising under the Labor policy.</p>
<p class="p1">So Labor proposes to perform a statistical miracle. Prices will keep rising but affordability will improve. One wonders about the means they will use to achieve this. Other than lower prices, the only mechanisms for improving affordability are a big cut in interest rates (already at record lows and not controlled by the politicians) and/or a big rise in incomes (not part of the plan, as far as I know).</p>
<p class="p1">This confirms – yet again – that politicians collectively lack even a primary school understanding of how property markets work and how their blinkered policies impact on real estate consumers. They seem unable to think policies through to logical conclusions. They keep introducing laws which they claim will improve affordability but which make it worse – every time.</p>
<p class="p3">This is playing out at a state level, with the Governments in charge of the two biggest states slugging foreign investors with new taxes. They maintain that this will somehow make housing cheaper but sadly - yet again - it will have the opposite impact.</p>
<p class="p3">There are widely diverging views on affordability – how serious it is, what causes the problem, who’s to blame for prices rising and how to fix things. But one area where most parties tend to agree is that increasing the supply of dwellings would have a beneficial impact.</p>
<p class="p3">In fact, the best chance of bringing down prices at a local level is creation of an oversupply. As we have seen in selected locations around Australia in recent years, it’s the one major element that causes prices to drop.</p>
<p class="p3">Specific markets, notably inner-city apartment markets in some capital cities, are poised for a hefty rise in supply which is linked directly to foreign investment. If planned projects proceed, price decline is almost inevitable.</p>
<p class="p3">But state government moves in Victoria and New South Wales to lift sharply increase taxes on foreign buyers of Australia real estate are likely to prevent or limit that increase in supply.</p>
<p class="p3">Coupled with moves by the banks to curtail lending to foreign buyers and ATO measures affecting sales above $2 million, Australia has quickly cobbled together a series of major disincentives to foreign investment. There are reports of Asian investors switching their focus away from Australia to other, more welcoming nations.</p>
<p class="p3">If foreign investors stop buying (they won’t all be turned away, but many will, I suspect) many of the proposed apartment projects simply will not be built. </p>
<p class="p3">The big increase in new dwelling supply will be lost, as will many construction jobs. </p>
<p class="p3">In reality, I suspect the state measures have little to do with a desire to improve affordability. It’s essentially a cash grab, disguised as a measure to help young Australians achieve home ownership.</p>
<p class="p3">Like everything else coming out of the befuddled brains of politicians, the moves will make the problems in real estate worse.</p>
<p class="p1"><em>Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a></em></p>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Cash grab or about affordability? Terry Ryder

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
<p><span>GUEST OBSERVER</span></p>
<p><span>It is time for the state government to put the interests of first homebuyers at the top of its agenda.</span></p>
<p>As part of a review of its Real Tax Policy ahead of the June 10, 2016 NSW Budget, REINSW has called for the state government to make amendments to stamp duty for first homebuyers.</p>
<p><span>Home ownership is not only something that individuals should aspire to, it is also something that government should foster and encourage as a means of building wealth and providing for a persons care post employment.</span></p>
<p><span>The NSW government needs to provide first homebuyers with a 50 percent reduction in the stamp duty on a purchase of a residential property less than $1 million and provide the ability to pay the stamp duty over time. </span></p>
<p><span>Not supporting first homebuyers is to say the least short sighted and creates the risk that our best and brightest will be enticed to other states where the dream of home ownership can be a reality. </span></p>
<p><span>The existing first homebuyer incentives are focused on new dwellings. The strategy being, by focusing demand toward new properties this will correct the supply problem. </span></p>
<p><span>Unfortunately the strategy has two major short comings, firstly most first homebuyers buy existing properties as new dwellings are financially beyond their capacity. Secondly increasing demand will not solve the supply problem. </span></p>
<p><span>We refer to ourselves us the Premier State, if there is truth behind the words then providing a pathway for our first homebuyers into their own home, is a clear way to demonstrate that the words have substance,.</span></p>
<p><em>John Cunningham is president, REINSW and can be contacted <a href="https://www.reinsw.com.au/imis15_Prod/web" target="_blank">here</a>. </em></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Taxation

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Taxation

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News