Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

Joel Robinson

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more international and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

First look: Aqualand joins St Leonards apartment party

Superannuation

<html><body>
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has today released a speech, ‘Enhancing Australia’s superannuation system: a vision of a sustainable future’, delivered by deputy chairman Helen Rowell to the 2017 ASFA Conference in Sydney this morning. In her speech, Rowell presented a vision for a stronger superannuation system that meets the ongoing needs of its members, and explained how changes to the prudential framework will help to deliver this. Mrs Rowell’s comments included:  
<ul>
<li>‘APRA is also taking steps to make sure that the prudential framework supports trustees delivering quality outcomes for superannuation fund members, complementing the Government’s proposed reforms. We will shortly release a consultation package outlining proposed revisions to the prudential framework, including changes to promote greater transparency, especially around expenditure, and implement member outcomes assessments for all funds.’</li>
<li>‘…the changes proposed in our upcoming consultation package are designed to put pressure on poor performers – irrespective of industry segment – to lift their game or, if the needed improvement is not possible within a reasonable timeframe, to gracefully exit the industry.’ 
</li>
<li>‘…at what point does the level of choice become more a headache than a help? It seems legitimate to ask why the industry offers members an average of nearly 200 investment options when many funds have a significant proportion of members in their default MySuper products and hence relatively few members in each o&gt;f the many choice investment options on offer.’</li>
<li>‘Our preliminary analysis of outcomes across the industry using a wide range of metrics suggests, however, that there may be some correlation between enhanced member outcomes and board composition. The trustees with outcomes at the better end of the industry, on average, appear to be those that have appointed independent or non-affiliated directors.’</li>
</ul>
The full speech is available on the website at:  <a id="LPlnk11598" href="http://www.apra.gov.au/Speeches/Pages/Enhancing-Australias-superannuation-system.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.apra.gov.au/Speeches/Pages/Enhancing-Australias-superannuation-system.aspx</a>
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Enhancing Australia’s superannuation system, a vision of a sustainable future: APRA's Helen Rowell

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Two decades of reforms, reviews and inquiries appear to have better served the financial sector than the interests of super fund members.
At first glance Australia’s 214 major superannuation funds are performing well, giving a healthy 9.2% return on the A$1.4 trillion we have deposited with them. But there are issues with our publicly mandated but privately controlled superannuation system.
Admittedly, our current system provides a range of benefits - increasing retirement incomes, giving us plenty of choice between funds (in theory if not in practice), and investing in the Australian economy.
But the operating expenses for Australian funds consistently and significantly outstrip those in other OECD countries. Fees are high and there is little evidence that higher fees lead to better services.
In 2009 the Inquiry into Financial Products and Services in Australia recommended there be an annual check on the quality of advice. The only superannuation-related survey that has been undertaken to date found that 39% of advice was poor and only 3% was good quality. No further surveys have been conducted.
Australians are forced to contribute to superannuation funds, without the right of exit, but they aren’t protected from high fees or bad investment strategies. A nationalised superannuation system, or one that combines private and public super funds, could simplify the system and reduce costs.
<h2>Baked in problems</h2>
Australia’s system wasn’t originally intended to be entirely privately-run, which has left us without many necessary protections (such as appropriate disclosure of fees and charges).
Australia was almost alone among OECD countries in reaching the 1980s with no national employment-related retirement income scheme. There had been at least ten attempts to set one up between the 1890s to the 1970s. All failed to win support from employers, existing superannuation funds, life offices and state governments.
An additional attempt was made in the last Parliament of the Liberal government in 1972. The incoming Whitlam Labor government also tried to introduce a national superannuation scheme in 1973, establishing the Hancock inquiry.
Consistent with its recommendations, the Hawke/Keating Labor government intended to move forward with a national scheme. However, against the backdrop of past nationalisation failures, recession, high inflation, a wage freeze, strikes, declining union membership, and the increasing discontinuation of superannuation products, the government instead privatised it.
Thus, the Hawke/Keating Labor government was a major winner of a privatised scheme gaining electoral support from a coalition of private interests.
Absent from this coalition were the fund members. There is no evidence of any consultation process with either the fund members themselves and/or any consumer representative groups prior to the development of our present, privatised regime.
The Superannuation Guarantee scheme introduced a minimum employer contribution to superannuation for most employees. This scheme was a windfall for the financial sector, as they received a guaranteed, trillion-dollar stream of superannuation contributions to look after with no exit rights for members.
The union movement would also appear to be a winner from privatisation. The privatised system allowed the unions to expand the number of their existing industry funds to earn more administration and investment-based fees. The 41 industry funds currently hold A$545.2 billion, compared to the A$587.8 billion held by the 128 for-profit retail funds.
It could be argued that the losers in this mandatory regime are the fund members who were marginalised from the outset. As it was originally intended to be a government-run system, many of the administrative processes necessary for an efficient and effective privatised system were originally absent.
For example, there were no codified accounting, reporting and disclosure requirements. No mandatory requirements for the disclosure of fees and charges. No codified audit report requirements. And, for nearly a decade, the regulator did not have appropriate constitutional powers to enforce civil and criminal penalties against non-complying trustees.
Two-decades of reforms have remedied the constitutional, auditing and accounting issues. But significant issues remain, including limitations in the disclosure of fees and charges and the related issue of conflicted payments.
<h2>Alternative super systems</h2>
In theory, there are alternative superannuation models for Australia to consider. For example, there are nationalised schemes such as the government-run Canadian Pension Plan.
All of the funds from the Canadian Pension Plan are invested by Canada’s Pension Plan Investment Board, which operates with a clear mandate to maximise returns, without undue risk of loss.
Nationalising the superannuation industry in this way appears to have benefits - members would receive the same return for equal contributions, employers and employees would only have to deal with one fund, and the amount spent on running the fund (for example on administration, marketing) would be reduced.
There is also the option of adopting a combined system, as in Norway, which features both national and privately-run superannuation funds.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/86067/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">In reality however, given the coalition of vested interests that have forged Australia’s existing, publicly mandated, privatised system, only the voice of the members themselves can force an honest and open debate on this important issue.
Suzanne Taylor, Lecturer/Co-Ordinator, Queensland University of Technology.
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/could-we-nationalise-the-superannuation-system-even-if-we-wanted-to-86067" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Could we nationalise the superannuation system even if we wanted to?: Suzanne Taylor

<html><body>
The ruling coalition has used its numbers in parliament’s lower house to push through the Budget move allowing first home buyers to contribute more to their super and then use it for a deposit. 
It also says that the scheme won’t undermine Australia’s retirement savings system.
The legislation also allows older Australians to contribute the proceeds of the sale of their family home to their super, Fairfax Media reported.
The superannuation top-up scheme offers tax breaks.
Labor and the Greens are against the proposal, with the opposition saying it will do nothing to address housing affordability.
Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen said the scheme will only undermine the superannuation system, leading to a war of words with the ruling party.
Assistant minister to the treasurer, Michael Sukkar, said Labor was peddling misconceptions.
“It’s quite shocking and surprising to see any political party take a view that a tax cut for first home buyers is something that they cannot support,” Sukkar said.
Labor, however, would not oppose two other housing affordability bills announced in the budget.
The measures include limiting deductions investors can claim in relation to residential properties and slapping foreign owners with a vacancy tax if their property is vacant for at least six months during a one-year period.
Bowen said there was nothing to oppose because the measures were ineffective.
“What we see here is some minor tinkering which won’t do anything for housing affordability,” he told parliament.
 
</body></html>

First home super scheme passes lower house test

<html><body>
Retirement savings of 1.4 million Australians are languishing in "sub-scale" default superannuation funds, according to Financial Services Council.
Some members could be facing a $170,000 shortfall at retirement due to their inclusion in these underperforming funds, the council said.
About $94 billion is sitting in 33 default super funds that manage less than $10 billion, according to the latest research released by the council.
The council said the average return of the 33 funds over 10 years was 4.5 per cent per annum, or 1.4 per cent lower than the performance of the best performing Mysuper products.
The council said this performance gap meant a consumer could be more than $170,000 worse off by retirement if they remained in an underperforming default fund.
"If this many Australian workers were enabled by law to languish in poorly paying jobs with working conditions way below their peers, for as long as 40 years, there would be outrage across the entire community," FSC chief executive Sally Loane was cited as saying by The Australian Financial Review.
Default super funds are so called because workers who do not select a fund are put into a default fund named in their award – are not-for-profit industry funds owned by Australia's biggest unions.
Research by Chant West has said that the not-for-profit funds with less than $10 billion in funds under management have, on average, higher fees and lower returns than funds with more than $10 billion.
"Its [FSC's] analysis of scale focuses on not-for-profit funds, as the level of assets in a particular fund is a reasonable measure of scale," Chant West head of research, Ian Fryer, said.
"On the other hand, major retail providers issue many different products, and even though the assets of some products may be relatively low, those products still benefit from the scale of the organisation to some extent."
However, by Industry Super Australia's analysis of Australian Prudential Regulation Authority data for the 12 months to June 2016, default industry funds with less than $10 billion in FUM outperformed retail funds with FUM greater than $10 billion not listed in awards by 1.28 per cent over 10 years, and by 1.16 per cent over five years.
The FSC refused to name the 33 sub-scale funds identified in the research but analysis from Rainmaker based on APRA figures reveals only 27 funds in the country that have more than $10 billion in FUM.
"Some of Australia's best funds like Care Super and BT Super For Life would only just make it. But even more amazingly, top funds like Equip Super, Vision Super, Energy Super, Statewide, AustSafe, BUSSQ, ANZ SmartChoice and HUB24 wouldn't," said Alex Dunnin, Rainmaker executive director, research and compliance.
"Large funds of course have major advantages, but well managed boutique funds have repeatedly shown themselves to be amazingly competitive. Indeed a good question to ask is whether all large funds are exploiting their advantages," he said.
Other funds under the $10 billion mark include the Australia Post Superannuation Scheme with FUM of $7.4 billion, AMP Flexible Super Retirement Account with just over $9 billion and NGS Super with $7.8 billion. 
The Productivity Commission inquiry into default superannuation is looking at ways to carve up billions of dollars of super contributions under the default scheme.
Industry funds sector wants a system where the Fair Work Commission is responsible for selecting which funds are placed in the awards, while the retail sector has argued that the market should be opened up to wholesale, or near wholesale, competition.
Loane said the current Fair Work Commission default arrangement should not be tolerated.
"Many can't change funds because of the current industrial awards governing default super, and many are chronically disengaged or disinterested. Either way the system needs to change if the policy is going to work for all Australians," she said.
In its submission to the Productivity Commission's inquiry into the competitiveness and efficiency of the superannuation system, the FSC said the commission should recommend a model that allows consumers to exit underperforming funds and switch to a fund, whether it is a retail or an industry fund, that will deliver stronger returns and a more comfortable retirement.
</body></html>

Financial Services Council says $94 billion sitting in underperforming default super funds

<html><body>
Amid the concerns around investing in property and shares, super funds as an asset class have in general delivered double-digit returns, according to two research groups.
Super funds delivered an average 10.7 per cent return for the year to June 30, 2017, marking the eighth consecutive year of positive growth, according to research group Chant West.
Even among the super funds, industry funds performed best, returning an average of 11.1 per cent. Meanwhile, for-profit retail super funds returned 9.7 per cent, meaning industry funds outperformed their competitors for all periods out to 15 years.
The funds were resilient even in the face of political and economic shocks such as  the election of Donald Trump as US President and Brexit.
"It's been a really interesting and, in many ways, surprising year because this strong result has been achieved against a backdrop of considerable uncertainty, both political and economic,” Chant West director Warren Chant said. 
“It just shows how markets – which represent the combined views of thousands of professional investors – are able to cut through the 'noise' and focus on the investment fundamentals.”
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/07/20/ChantWest.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/07/20/ChantWest.png" alt="">
Rival researcher, SuperRatings, came up with similar results, with the average fund return for last financial year topping 10.4%. 
SuperRatings estimates that $140 billion has been added to super accounts in investment earnings for the year.
“At a time when inflation hovers below 2% per annum, Australian super funds continue to far exceed expectations, with accrued earnings of well over 100% since the end of the GFC. Over the last 5 years alone, funds have averaged 10% earnings every year, more than erasing the pain of the GFC and putting retirees in a significantly improved position than they could ever have hoped for,” said Jeff Bresnahan, SuperRatings chairman.
Industry fund Hostplus topped the list with a 13.2 per cent return, with even the worst-performing fund in the median-growth category delivering 7.4 per cent, according to Chant West.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/07/20/SuperRatings.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/07/20/SuperRatings.png" alt=""> 
Funds in the median growth category have 61 per cent to 80 per cent allocation to growth assets and are usually the preferred ones. 
Funds that excelled this year tended to go against the investment trend, by having higher allocations to unlisted assets, which traditionally come at a significantly higher cost than the increasingly popular passive strategies, said SuperRatings in a media release. 
“This once again debunks the argument that low cost investment strategies are good for Australians. Low cost passive strategies will only guarantee chronic regular underperformance, which will impact retirement benefits for all Australians and undermine the superannuation system.”
The top 10 performing funds in 2016/17 covered more than 6 million Australians and all exceeded the SuperRatings’ Industry Benchmark of 10.4%, it said.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/07/20/SuperRatingsOverall.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/07/20/SuperRatingsOverall.png" alt="">
The key points to note for the 2016/17 financial year, according to Chant West were.
<ul>
<li>Hedged international shares were the strongest performing asset sector, surging 18.9%. However, the appreciation of the Australian dollar pulled this return back to 14.7% in unhedged terms.</li>
<li>Australian shares performed strongly with a return of 13.8%.</li>
<li>After being the strongest performer in 2015/16, Australian listed property was the worst performing sector this year, falling 5.6%. Global listed property fared better, but still returned just 2.2%. Unlisted property, on the other hand, had another solid year, up 10.3%.</li>
<li>Infrastructure also performed well, with global listed infrastructure up 11.1% and unlisted infrastructure delivering returns in the low teens. Private equity also provided a healthy return of 11.3%.</li>
<li>The traditional defensive asset sectors yielded very low returns. Australian and international bonds barely made it into positive territory with returns of 0.2% and 0.5%, respectively, while the return from cash was just 1.8%.</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

prateek24-ezbwHMbNAk

Super funds deliver double-digit returns for eighth year in a row

<html><body>
ASIC has intervened in relation to 21 superannuation trustees, representing 15 per cent of the trustee population, to improve 'Transparency Information' (TI) on their super fund websites.
Under s29QB of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act), each superannuation fund must disclose TI on a website and keep it up to date at all times.
TI comprises remuneration, governance and other information related to the fund; for example trustee directors’ remuneration for the last two financial years, fund trust deeds and product disclosure statements, a summary of significant event notices sent to fund members in the last two years and a summary of how the trustee voted in the last financial year in relation to listed shares held by the fund.
ASIC's action follows an earlier review of transparency disclosure requirements introduced as part of the Stronger Super reforms (refer: 15-245MR), and a broader focus on ensuring superannuation trustees deliver transparent and accessible superannuation fund information.
Twenty-one super fund websites were identified as failing to meet TI requirements. Two of the super funds had assets exceeding $10 billion while the remaining 19 were smaller funds.
ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said the economic significance of superannuation meant that information about the superannuation industry should be transparent, both for fund members and gatekeepers such as analysts, advisers and journalists.
'ASIC's expectation is that super fund websites should be easily found by searching on the fund's name using an Internet search engine and that the website homepage should prominently point to the Transparency Information', Mr Kell said.
The transparency deficiencies identified in ASIC's review comprised:
<ul>
<li>no super fund website (10 funds);</li>
<li>no TI on the fund website (four funds);</li>
<li>no remuneration information (five funds); and</li>
<li>remuneration disclosed in bands, rather than for each individual executive officer (two funds).</li>
</ul>
ASIC wrote to the trustees of the 21 super funds asking them to address these transparency failures.
As a result, seven trustees disclosed the required information, five made it easier to find the information and trustees of two small funds, who did not have websites, sought relief from TI obligations.
Seven trustees transferred fund members to another fund before winding up the fund. Two trustees also improved their procedures for ensuring that TI is up to date.
Table 1 sets out the results according to TI failure type.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/07/05/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-05%20at%209.59.37%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/07/05/Screen%20Shot%202017-07-05%20at%209.59.37%20am.jpg" alt="">
ASIC has received applications for relief from TI obligations from two trustees that were in breach of the requirement to have a website, but no relief has been granted at this stage.
ASIC cannot give relief for breaches that have already taken place and will consider what further action may be necessary here.
'ASIC's expectations about effective disclosure that complies with the TI requirements are addressed in new MySuper FAQ D7, our earlier media release 15‑245MR ASIC reviews transparency information on super websites and other ASIC MySuper FAQs.
‘We encourage trustees to familiarise themselves with this guidance when designing or updating their super websites', Mr Kell said.
Regulations 2.37 and 2.38 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 specify what TI must include.
Failure to comply with TI obligations is a strict liability offence.
The 21 super funds where TI deficiencies were identified represented approximately 8 per cent of APRA-regulated funds (that are not small APRA funds).
ASIC has given industry relief and guidance in relation to the timing of the provision of information under s29QB (refer: Regulatory Guide 252 Keeping superannuation websites up to date).
</body></html>

ASIC acts to improve transparency of super websites

<html><body>
Household net worth increased by $227 billion to $9.64 trillion in the first quarter of 2017. 
Contrary to what you intuitively might expect, the total value of residential housing as a share of the total assets hasn't really changed all that much over recent decades, even today sitting at just a little over half. 
A big part of the reason for that has been due to the popularity and success of compulsory superannuation, while Aussies are also now hoarding some $1.06 trillion in cash and deposits, a thumping 22 per cent of financial assets. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/06/30/HW1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/06/30/HW1.jpg" alt="">
Average net worth per capita has come absolutely storming back since the March 2009 nadir, rising by an extraordinary 67 per cent to make Australia the world's second wealthiest country after Switzerland in per capita terms.
Now someone will no doubt Tweet me to say that the housing component should be subtracted - you can do it yourself, the numbers are right there above!
Average net worth per capita increased by ~$34,500 over the year to a record high of ~$394,000.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/06/30/HW2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/06/30/HW2.jpg" alt="">
Housing loan debt also continues to rise to well beyond $1.6 trillion, making households twitchier about increases in mortgage rates than has ever been the case before. 
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/06/30/HW5.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/06/30/HW5.jpg" alt="">
Mortgage debt has expanded at a slower pace than asset values, however, bringing the household debt to assets ratio down to 19.5 per cent, while the mortgage debt to land and dwelling values ratio declined again to 26.4 per cent.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/06/30/HW3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/06/30/HW3.jpg" alt="">
The most noteworthy housing market change in recent months has been mortgage rates being ratcheted higher on interest-only loans.  
Given that the hikes largely took place after the end of March, it's likely that interest payable will rise throughout the remainder of 2017.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/06/30/HW4.jpg" target="_parent">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/06/30/HW4.jpg" alt="">
EOFY brings super returns
It's the end of another financial year today!
After an up-and-down sort of a year at times - and assuming the share market doesn't unexpectedly crash this morning - superannuation funds will return about 10 per cent for 2016/17 to notch up an eighth successive year of positive returns, as the share market continues to claw its way back.
From a housing market perspective, almost all commentators are now on board with the notion that the Sydney market has moved into a slowdown phase, which will have knock-on effects to household net worth later in 2017.
Banks will continue to push home loans hard, but investment mortgages will be harder to come by following a raft of tightening measures. 
Yet we also shouldn't ignore that every set of labour force figures released lately has been pointing to a Sydney jobs market that is firing on all cylinders. 
Population growth accelerated to about 91,000 in Sydney in 2016, despite internal migration to Queensland. 
Meanwhile, the unemployment rate has declined to 4.4 per cent, and job vacancies in New South Wales have risen to unprecedented highs, suggesting that many more jobs are being created. 
Anecdotally, I've heard from more than one source that some professional jobs in Sydney are attracting dozens if not hundreds of applications, though whether the applicants are unemployed, under-employed, or from interstate, who can say? 
With first homebuyers sitting out of the market in recent weeks awaiting the introduction of new incentives - applicable to established properties priced up to $800,000 from 1 July - I wouldn't yet rule out a resurgent Sydney housing market later in 2017, at least in the bottom quartile of the market.
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Mortgage rate tweaks set to bite: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The countdown to 1st July 2017 begins and people need to act now.
Starting 1st of July, superannuation legislation will change in Australia and everyone needs to understand how the changes will affect them.
Australians are encouraged to plan ahead with the upcoming super changes such as the $1.6 million transfer balance cap, removal of tax exemption for transition-to-retirement pensions, cut in annual concessional (before-tax) contributions cap to $25,000 and catch-up concessional contributions over 5 year period from July 2018, among others.
One advantage to the annual concessional before-tax contributions cap cut is the catch-up concessional contributions.
However, it will not start until 1st July 2018. Unused portions of the concessional cap every year will be allowed to be carried forward for up to five years if you have an account balance of $500,000 or less.
Australians who consider making super contributions starting July 2017 should know that the annual concessional before-tax contributions cap will be a lot lower than previous years, dropping to $25,000 from $30,000 for people under 50 and $35,000 for those over 50.
Starting 1st of July 2017, more Australians will pay double contributions tax (15% + 15%) because of the lowering of the income threshold from $300,000 to $250,000.
Those with adjusted taxable income of over $250,000 will have extra contributions tax and all concessional contributions will have 30% tax instead of 15%. Those in certain public sector funds will be hit with this extra tax which will raise $2.5 billion in four years.
According to the government, only a small number of affluent Australians will be affected by the superannuation changes.
The 2016 budget claims that the changes will affect only 4% of people in super but some disagree, saying it will impact a lot more people than the government expects.
Other issues include estate planning and succession.
Where the death benefit exceeds $1.6 million in estate planning, the excess should be cashed out as a lump sum. Those who wish to retain the superannuation benefits through reverting or paying a pension to their dependents upon inheritance will also be affected.
Those who are in second marriages and wish to make provision for children from a previous marriage will also be impacted.
People have already structured their estate to give pension to their children from their superannuation while the spouse can access the balance as well. With the $1.6 million cap, funds may no longer be enough to sustain the pensions and spouse’s standard of living.
The superannuation changes may be plugging revenue holes instead of building a sustainable system, which can provide for retirement adequately.
This may even result in bigger demands on public finances down the line. People may be discouraged to build their super and find other investment vehicles instead. They may turn to residential property investment but housing affordability remains an issue.
The good news is that superannuation will be more flexible for those with different work patterns as the new caps will be eligible for tax deductions.
This will be beneficial to those who salary sacrifice, who are self-employed and have part-time work.
 
Ed Chan is the founding partner of <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au/" target="_blank">Chan &amp; Naylor</a>.
 
</body></html>

echan-hSGJw4wwC5

Superannuation changes and their impact on estate planning and succession: Ed Chan

<html><body>
Listed fractional investment fund manager DomaCom Ltd is seeking a Federal Court ruling to declare that its sub-funds are not in-house assets or related trusts for the purposes of the Superannuation Industry Supervision Act. 
Such a ruling would confirm that SMSFs can invest in property sub-funds where the tenant of the underlying property is a related party of the SMSF, the fund said in an ASX statement.
It said that DomaCom subsidiary DomaCom Australian Limited has “supported  an action in the Federal Court for a declaration that DomaCom sub-funds are not inhouse assets or related trusts for the purposes of the SIS (Superannuation Industry Supervision) Act”. 
DomaCom chief executive Arthur Naoumidis noted that the ability to use superannuation to help people into a home was a topical issue and DomaCom Fund could play a key role in solving it while still protecting SMSF assets. 
“The unique arm’s length structure of the DomaCom Fund protects the SMSF assets whilst generating commercial rates of income and capital return that the underlying residential property delivers,” he said.
Gen X/Y investors could use residential property as an anchor asset class for their superannuation portfolios, expanding to other asset classes later in life. 
These investors could then rent the property and acquire more interest in the related sub-fund with time, he added.
“We have been working for several years to solve the growing problem of affordability among our young in their quest to buy a home and believe that our fund may provide the solution,” Naoumidis said.
Earlier this year, DomaCom invested in a property in Victoria’s prime Western Districts pastoral land and had 90 retail investors. 
</body></html>

DomaCom seeks court ruling to exclude sub-funds from SIS Act 

<html><body>
Superannuation fund returns continued their eight year bull run in April.
Boosted by international shares and a fall in the Australian dollar, the median balanced option return posted 1.4 percent.
It built on the 1.5 percent returned in March taking the financial year to date return to 10 percent.
"Even a 300 point loss on Wall St in mid-May wasn’t enough to stop the momentum with May now also looking like delivering positive returns for funds,” said SuperRatings chairman Jeff Bresnahan.
“We have not seen the strong boost in confidence many have been hoping for, but neither have we seen any sign of a sustained pullback or dramatic loss of momentum.
“Despite the fact that significant risks remain, including in the housing market, the outlook for 2017 remains somewhat positive.”
Cash and fixed interest returns remain meagre, sitting at 1.4 percent and 1.3 percent for the financial year to date respectively.
Australian and global shares have been the star performers for the financial year thus far with returns of 15.3 percent and 15.6 percent respectively.
“It would be a great result to achieve a double-digit return for the financial year, but we still have a bit longer to go,” said Mr Bresnahan.
“Volatility has begun to increase in line with continued political uncertainty globally, and market momentum is positive.
“However, investors should be careful not to under-price risk in this environment.”
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/24/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-24%20at%2010.21.24%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/24/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-24%20at%2010.21.24%20am.jpg" alt="">
The Australian market had a mixed month in April, posting a return of 1.0 percent, weighed down by negative performance from the Materials (-0.2 percent) and Energy (-0.6 percent) sectors, and a challenging month for Consumer Staples (-2.6 percent).
The main gains came from the Industrials sector (+4.4 percent), with strong gains from Brambles (+10.6 percent) following its announcement that it is on track to meet its 5 percent sales growth target.
Another recovery story came from the much-maligned Bellamy’s, which gained strongly late in the month to post a return of 22.4 percent with the installation of new management, as well as continued demand for Australian baby formula from the Chinese market.
The US market rally continued unabated through April, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average price index posting a rise of 3.6 percent – this despite a disappointing GDP reading of only 0.7 percent for Q1 2017.
The French CAC 40 returned 7.1 percent in April as Emmanuel Macron sailed to victory in the French presidential election, while the EuroStoxx 600 Index gained 5.8 percent, as confidence in the European recovery continued to build.
“Interestingly, equity market gains have coincided with a fall in yields in major markets, as well as a fall in the US dollar,” said Mr Bresnahan.
“With valuations starting to look high in the US, investors are holding out for the President’s proposed tax cuts to be made law, which are needed to consummate the reflation trade.”
Global yields fell in April, continuing a downward trend started in the previous month.
While rates have been trending higher since October 2016 and yield curves have steepened, investors have appeared to embrace duration again, reflected in longer- term fund flow.
The US 10-year Treasury yield fell from 2.39 percent to 2.28 percent after reaching an intra-month low of 2.17 percent.
While recent CPI releases in both Europe and the US have been promising, the numbers have moderated in recent months, and core inflation remains below central bank targets.
Longer-term returns for super continue to sit close to funds’ inflation targets, with the seven-year return sitting at an estimated 7.8 percent p.a. (above most funds’ CPI targets).
The 10-year return moved lower to 4.8 percent p.a., although it remains impacted by the Global Financial Crisis, which occurred nearly ten years ago.
The point of maximum monetary stimulus has passed, signalled by the US Fed’s March rate hike, although monetary policy remains very accommodative globally, and quantitative easing measures in Europe have not yet been tapered.
Compared to a year ago, when the FYTD return was 1.4 percent, there has been a strong turnaround in returns, but the idea of returns being lower for longer is still a key point of discussion in the industry.
While inflation appears to be taking hold, it has moderated in recent months, prompting central banks, and especially the US Fed, to reconsider the pace of tightening.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/24/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-24%20at%2010.23.21%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/24/Screen%20Shot%202017-05-24%20at%2010.23.21%20am.jpg" alt="">
 
He noted Australian markets have been supported by fundamentals, with full-time employment continuing to grow in April, and manufacturing firmly in expansion.
However, there is also evidence of a loss of upward price pressure, partly as a result of declining energy prices and tumbling iron ore values through March and April.
The 2017-18 Federal Budget, delivered this month, presented an optimistic view of the economy, with the path back to surplus in 2020-21 predicated on a gradual lift in wages growth from 1.9 percent to 3.75 percent.
“Economic indicators remain robust, although weaker inflation figures may be of some concern to investors as well as central banks."
</body></html>

Superannuation

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Superannuation

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News