<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/consolidated-properties">Consolidated Properties Group</a> (CPG) is approaching the launch of its latest Brisbane riverfront development, Castile, on the dress circle Skyring Terrace in Newstead.

VIP buyers are now being engaged, with a full public sales launch coming later this year.

Positioned as the final opportunity to secure a new absolute riverfront residence on the East bank of Newstead, Teneriffe or New Farm, Castile at 47 Skyring Terrace has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a> as a timeless addition to the Brisbane skyline.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=371113]

The name Castile draws on themes of permanence, sophistication and legacy, reflecting a broader vision centred on enduring architecture and timelessness in the rarest of riverfront positions.&nbsp;

CPG Chairman and CEO Don O’Rorke said the project had been envisioned as a future Brisbane icon.&nbsp;

“With 47 metres of direct river frontage and never to be built out views, 47 Skyring Terrace is the definitive address on the Brisbane River,” O’Rorke said.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=371114]

“Rather than following trend-based apartment design, Castile draws inspiration from Brisbane’s great heritage buildings, reinterpreting classical architecture into a contemporary riverfront landmark designed to stand proudly for the next 100 years,” he said.&nbsp;

The approved development will comprise 227 apartments across a 25-storey tower alongside a boutique six-storey riverfront building of just 12 residences.&nbsp;

Construction is scheduled to commence in September 2026.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150489]

Joel Robinson

CPG unveils Castile Newstead ahead of upcoming sales launch

Australia’s online shopping habits have shifted dramatically over the last decade. As eCommerce volumes surged, so too did the frustrations that came with traditional parcel delivery: missed deliveries, long Post Office queues, parcel theft and the challenge of being home during business hours.

Australia Post’s Parcel Lockers emerged as one of the more practical responses to that changing consumer behaviour.

What started as a relatively niche delivery option has evolved into a nationwide network of more than 1,400 self-service Parcel Lockers positioned at train stations, shopping centres, supermarkets and Post Offices across the country. The system allows Australians to send, collect and return parcels 24 hours a day, fundamentally changing how many people interact with deliveries.

The appeal is relatively straightforward: flexibility.

Instead of waiting at home for a delivery driver or rushing to a Post Office before closing time, users can direct eligible parcels to a Parcel Locker location of their choice. Once the parcel arrives, Australia Post sends a notification with a collection code or QR access through the AusPost app, allowing customers to retrieve their package at any time within the collection window.

For apartment residents in particular, the system has become increasingly valuable.

Higher-density living has created logistical challenges around deliveries, especially in buildings without concierge services or secure parcel rooms. Missed deliveries are common, while parcel theft has become an increasing concern as online shopping volumes continue to rise.

Australia Post itself has repeatedly highlighted the growing issue of “porch pirates” during peak shopping periods, encouraging customers to use Parcel Lockers as a safer alternative to unattended home deliveries.

That security aspect is one of the key reasons the Australia Post Parcel Locker network has grown so rapidly.

Parcel Lockers are positioned as secure, monitored collection points that reduce the risk of theft while also improving delivery efficiency for Australia Post. Instead of multiple redelivery attempts, parcels can be consolidated into a single secure destination.

The Parcel Lockers themselves are free to use through a MyPost account and support a range of parcel sizes up to 16 kilograms and dimensions of approximately 35 x 44 x 61 centimetres.

Beyond receiving parcels, the system has increasingly become integrated into the broader eCommerce ecosystem.

Customers can now use Parcel Lockers to return online purchases, while retailers have embraced the model as a way to improve delivery success rates and reduce friction in the shopping process. Australia Post has actively expanded partnerships with major retailers and promoted Parcel Lockers as part of a broader out-of-home strategy.

The timing of that expansion aligns with broader changes in Australian shopping behaviour.

The acceleration of online retail during and after the pandemic placed enormous pressure on delivery infrastructure. Parcel volumes reached record highs, particularly during Black Friday and Christmas periods, with Australia Post delivering more than 100 million parcels during peak festive seasons.

That growth forced logistics providers to rethink the “last mile” of delivery, widely regarded as the most expensive and operationally difficult stage of the process.

Parcel Locker systems have increasingly been viewed as part of the long-term solution.

The concept itself is not unique to Australia. Parcel Locker networks have become common globally, particularly across Europe and Asia, where dense urban environments and apartment living create similar logistical challenges. But Australia’s geography and suburban sprawl made adoption slower initially.

Now, however, the convenience factor is driving mainstream usage.

For commuters, Parcel Lockers near train stations allow parcels to be collected on the way home from work. For apartment dwellers, they remove the uncertainty around access and missed deliveries.

The rise of the AusPost app has also streamlined the experience, centralising notifications, tracking and Parcel Locker access into a single platform. Australia Post has increasingly pushed customers toward app-based delivery management, partly as a way to combat phishing scams and fake delivery notifications, which have become more sophisticated in recent years.

The Parcel Locker model is also beginning to influence property development itself.

Parcel management has become a growing consideration in apartment building design, particularly as online shopping becomes embedded in everyday life. Many new residential developments are now incorporating dedicated parcel rooms or Parcel Locker systems into foyers and communal spaces.

For developers, parcel management is increasingly viewed as part of the broader resident amenity offering, alongside gyms, wellness spaces and communal work areas.

That reflects a wider evolution in how residential buildings are designed.

Apartment buyers are placing greater emphasis on convenience, security and operational functionality, particularly in higher-density urban environments. Parcel delivery, once considered a minor operational detail, has become an increasingly important part of that equation.

Australia Post’s Parcel Locker network sits at the centre of that behavioural shift.

What began as a simple alternative delivery option has evolved into a key piece of infrastructure supporting Australia’s growing eCommerce economy and changing urban lifestyles.

And as online shopping continues to expand, the role of Parcel Lockers is likely to become even more embedded in how Australians live, shop and receive goods.

How Australia Post Parcel Lockers changed parcel delivery convenience in Australia

Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.

Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;

David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;

“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;

Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;

At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.

Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.

Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.

David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.

“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;

Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;

Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;

However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.

Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.

The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.

Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.

“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.

“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" />

Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.

The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.

“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.

“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" />

Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.

“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.

The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.

“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”

The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.

The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.

Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.

Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.

The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.

“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.

“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.

“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”

The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.

“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”

From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.

“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”

The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.

“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.

Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.

“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.

“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”

The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.

“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.

Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.

&nbsp;

Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

Price Guides

<html><body>
The practice by unethical real estate agents to – ‘quote them low and watch it go’ could very well finally be a thing of the past – well in Queensland anyway (for starters). Governments from all political persuasions have struggled for decades to establish a best practice platform for the real estate industry.
Queensland is close to implementing the new legislation although they are struggling at the last hurdles given they are seeking that agents are not permitted to provide any price guides. The reforms have now been altered to permit agents providing a price guide on the internet.
This just keeps getting dumber and dumber given this whole process could be fixed so easily – all that’s required is for the vendors to publish their reserve price to all parties making inquiries. The prospective purchasers then make up their own minds as to what they believe the property is worth based on the published reserve price – a clean and transparent selling process.
I have always argued (successfully) that the difference between a good real estate agent and an average one is about 10% of the sale price. The difference by not quoting the agents price guide is that this figure is generally skewed to the attraction price as against the selling price which is exactly what should be the case in this day and age.
If a buyer wants to pursue a property at the vendor’s reserve price then all well and good. If on the other hand they construe that the expectations are too high then let the property run a reverse course – which is interesting as this then goes back to the respective agent’s negotiating skills. I’m not exactly sure what parts of this the agents don’t get as reserve price quoting will reward the agents with superior negotiating skills – which is exactly what vendors should be looking for.
There is a great role for public auctions in the real estate industry, just the system requires critiquing because rogue agents will always struggle with the truth. Watch this debate get very heated in coming weeks and months although rest assured there will be major changes across the board to the Australian property auction system.
Another fascinating week that had the “experts” (whatever they are) calling the end of the biggest Sydney property boom in a decade – what a load of rubbish!
To add some weight to these idiotic statements there are approximately 637 (and growing) suburbs that make-up Sydney. Yet in typical lackadaisical reporting fashion we read “dwelling values across Australia’s capital cities have recorded declines” – so they take the weighted averages over 637 suburbs in the case of Sydney to get an accurate positioning? Anyone applying this methodology is simply delusional as this in no way accurately defines real estate market trends – until such time as it is suburb by suburb this collective data is as useful as an ashtray on a motor bike.
<a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/30-04-2014-1-59-49-PM.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8520" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/30-04-2014-1-59-49-PM.jpg" alt="30-04-2014 1-59-49 PM" width="647" height="342"></a>
Source: Digital Finance Analytics
<a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/30-04-2014-1-58-58-PM.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8521" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/30-04-2014-1-58-58-PM.jpg" alt="30-04-2014 1-58-58 PM" width="664" height="361"></a>
Source: Digital Finance Analytics
The latest monthly banking statistics from APRA identify consistent lending to the end of March 2014. In February owner-occupied and investment loans were $1.231 billion and in March they came in at $1.236 billion. The ‘Big Four’ increased their market share from 84.3% to 84.4% which will have many suggesting that should there be a correction they will be in all sorts of bother.
What I would like to see is a graph showing where their respective loans were as we should remember during the global financial crisis (GFC) Mosman was tipped as having the highest delinquency rate in Australia where it was later proved it had the lowest.
As they say, be careful about calling yourself an expert. An ex is a has–been and a spurt is a drip under pressure. For some, it’s human nature to predict/promote themselves as some type of modern day Nostradamus who quite remarkably possess this innate ability to read the future.
Recently we read that in America, Dr Marc Faber is predicting that this year we will witness a 1987-type stock market crash although this time it will be much more severe. For those who have no idea what exactly happened here it is <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2007/200713/200713pap.pdf" target="_blank" title="Black Monday – 1987.">Black Monday – 1987.</a>
Given what transpired recently in the GFC, I would think that the vast majority are erring on the side of caution – which history has conclusively shown to be the smartest path.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Is the public auction system going – going – gone?

<html><body>
Discussing the issue of the potential price guidance ban in Queensland, the Real Estate Institute of New South Wales president Malcolm Gunning expressed his support for a recent petition for agents to publish reserve prices a week out from auction.
The <a href="/expert-insights/buying/louis-christopher-and-patrick-bright-say-media-outlets-are-ignoring-underquoting-petition">petition, from EPS Property Search's Patrick Bright</a>, looks to increase transparency by requiring real estate agents to publish the reserve prices to the public.
Gunning told Property Observer that he doesn't support the banning of price guides in Queensland, believing that they're "trying to exonerate the responsibility of under or over quoting". Just today, Property Observer reported that the Real Estate Buyers Association of Australia believe that <a href="/expert-insights/buying/coercion-will-be-rife-under-new-queensland-price-guide-laws-rebaa">coercion will be rife if the changes go through</a>.
With Brisbane labelled one of the upcoming investment hotspots, he also expressed concern for buyers in New South Wales and other states and territories who would be heading to the south-east Queensland suburbs for purchasing, unaware of what prices could be attained, where a local might be more familiar.
"In NSW, the institute uspports the agent giving an indication. Agents are dumb when they [underquote]and have no confidence in their ability," said Gunning.
In fact, he pointed to education being the real issue for New South Wales instances of underquoting.
"We think the problem is that in New South Wales the level of entry into real estate is the lowest in Australia and we think that [when agents underquote it is] reflective of agents not being confident in themselves."
He noted that in the last 18 months it has been difficult for agents, particularly those with little confidence in appraising a property, to provide an accurate price guide, with buyers getting desperate to purchase and chasing the properties beyond market expectations.
However, he said, the agent should be able to give a purchaser an indication of the vendors expectation, and perhaps mention the level of competition. If a buyer wants to compete at auction with other bidders, then this is their decision, however they should not be competing with a reserve price set higher than expectation.
Gunning expressed his support of John McGrath, who has been actively against removing the price guidance.
Despite the opposition, however, it might go through.
"The REIQ are supporting it, and they’re a strong organisation, so I think the government might pass it," he said.
He also told Property Observer that he has recently spoken with the Office of Fair Trading who have said that underquoting is not as high on their agenda as looking to knock out dodgy Registered Training Organisations.
"There are a lot of training organisations offering sub-standard training, we’re trying to lift the standard of the industry. We’re getting people coming in with just a week of training," he said.
He noted that the better agents who do not fall into underquoting tend to be those with higher levels of education.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

REINSW's Malcolm Gunning supports early publishing of reserve prices

<html><body>
The proposal to ban auction price guides in Queensland, which has in part been described as a decision to help stamp out the problem of underquoting, has been slammed by the Real Estate Buyers Agents Association of Australia (REBAA) who claim that not only will this action not stop the problem, but it could also deter buyers from bidding at auction.
REBAA spokesperson Scott McGeever said that the auction process is skewed in favour of real estate agents and the vendors, and changing this law will not change the status quo.
The Queensland laws, which are expected to be passed within coming weeks, has left McGeever questioning the decisions.
“The Queensland government has had the opportunity to make a real change in favour of home buyers but instead buyers will remain in the dark and coercion will be rife,” he said.
“The allowance of web-based price guides does nothing to provide clarity for would-be buyers, many of whom are already spending thousands of dollars on building and pest inspections for properties which aren’t really within their range.”
He noted that internet price guides are just a small component of the auction process, with this proposed solution to leave buyers vulnerable to selling agents who will use this to their advantage.
“Some real estate data sites allow owners, or those who own in the local area, to change price estimates for properties listed online, allowing for manipulation to occur,” he said.
“Buyers are often already uncertain about auction environments and with either less or manipulated information at hand this could reduce their bidding confidence even further.”
REBAA is the latest body to voice their opposition to the changes, joining the ranks of the REINSW, <a href="/news/qld/dark-ages-descending-on-queensland-as-auction-price-guide-ban-defies-common-sense-john-mcgrath">John McGrath</a> and a <a href="/news/qld/letter-from-the-editor-more-information-not-less-please-queensland">number of news organisations</a>, however there are still <a href="/news/queensland-price-guide-ban-garners-support-with-claims-debate-is-blown-out-of-proportion">a number of those supporting the proposed changes</a>.
Another solution to the underquoting may be to publish the reserve prices prior to the auction. An <a href="/news/nsw/real-estate-institutes-go-head-to-head-over-queensland-auction-price-guide-debate">online petition for this change in New South Wales is circulating, launched by buyer’s agent Patrick Bright</a>, and has seen vocal support from SQM Research’s Louis Christopher. Meanwhile, observer Terry Ryder, based in Queensland, has also been vocal on the issue of the Queensland price guide ban, <a href="/expert-insights/buying/dont-like-the-auction-price-guidance-ban-you-can-only-blame-yourself">telling those who dislike the ban that they can only blame themselves</a>.
</body></html>

"Coercion will be rife" under new Queensland price guide laws: REBAA

<html><body>
"It’s been almost impossible to give accurate price guidance when potential purchasers are prepared to fight and bid aggressively, resulting in some delighted vendors," the Ray White chairman Brian White recently noted.
The admission accompanied the Ray White Group achieving $3.2 billion in March sales nationally.
"How wise are vendors to have embraced auction in this cycle," <a href="https://www.raywhitegroup.com/white-paper/" target="_blank">he said in his latest monthly advisory</a>, The White Paper.
"All of the talk in Australia is about Sydney.
"But it went much broader than Sydney," he said earlier this month.
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
"It’s always a good sign for Australia when New South Wales is powering.
"It becomes a catalyst for confidence across the nation," he said. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
"Ray White in Victoria set a new record reflecting a dramatically improved Melbourne market," he said.
He pinpointed a number of offices that "showed just how big some real estate agencies can become.
"For example, <a href="https://rwdbgroup.com/" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Double Bay</a> did $120 million, <a href="https://rwremuera.co.nz/" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Remuera</a> in Auckland did $55 million, <a href="https://raywhitegw.com/" style="line-height: 1.3em;">Glen Waverley</a> in Melbourne also did close to $50 million.
"All massive increases over any previous level."
Last November he noted New South Wales was the standout with its first $1billion month, adding the experience at Ray White Balmain where Sam Kelso and Emily Sim opened a new business and were profitable in the first year, was "inspiring." 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
"We’re seeing record auction clearance rates," he wrote in late 2013.
"Property prices are increasing in most markets, particularly the big cities. 
"The highest percentage of property is now being taken to auction. 
"Confidence to upgrade one’s home is being backed by enthusiasm of a cycle a-go.
"Sooner or later, the cycle will lose intensity," he acknowledged. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Mr White likes to call markets as accurately as possible, and in the past weaker markets once noted "There's a terrible statistic in the industry that shows about half of sales are made at a price that is less than the owner was previously offered."
And he had also advised the only softness was the confidence hit that resource regions in Australia are now experiencing. 
"On a bearish note, prices are dropping in resource areas.
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
"A reminder of how closely linked property prices are to economic activity," he said. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Brian White has said the continued focus on China had resulted in the company being recently invited to present at a key investment conference being held by CCPIT – the arm of the Chinese Government promoting investment within and outside of China.  
But adding that while project sales continued at remarkable levels - "what would this market look like if it no longer had Asian interest?" 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Ray White chief says auction price guidance "almost impossible" in aggressive Sydney market

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
According to news reports it looks like the ban on price guides for properties up for auction in Queensland will go ahead when Parliament sits in May - with one minor amendment.
Vendors and selling agents will still be able to categorise the property in a price bracket for buyers searching on real estate websites. 
How will it affect the auction climate in Queensland?  Not much - auctions aren't as popular there and price guides have always been frowned upon.  But the debate has captured the attention of the major players in Sydney and Melbourne where auctions are the sales method of choice for many. A change such as this in these markets would dramatically alter the real estate landscape and make auctions less popular - a result many in the industry don't want despite the flaws in the current process. 
<blockquote>
Underquoting is a cruel, misleading and deceptive practice that needs to be stamped out for good.
</blockquote>
This is why I believe so many industry players have been so outspoken against the proposed changes. Their main claim has been that "buyers want pricing information". Yes, they are on the right track - buyers do want pricing information - however, they have left off the most important words in that statement which I believe to be "honest and transparent". 
The Queensland government's position can be summed up as "no price guides are better than phoney ones", and I have to agree.
Underquoting, or bait advertising as it’s also known, is a cruel, misleading and deceptive practice that needs to be stamped out for good.  
However, I believe the Queensland government is set to miss the mark here. They have the opportunity to make a real change for the better with the eyes of Australia's real estate industry watching.
Instead what is proposed is a half measure that doesn't really address the lack of transparency issue.
Naturally I much prefer my idea of making it mandatory to publish auction reserve prices seven days prior to auction as I've outlined in <a href="https://www.epspropertysearch.com.au/go/eps/blog/bringing-down-the-hammer-on-dodgy-auction-price-guides" target="_self">previous blogs</a>.  I believe my proposed changes would achieve a much better outcome for both the buyers and sellers.  Further my proposed changes would more than likely make auctions more popular with buyers due to this transparency.  If they are more popular with buyers they will be more popular with sellers, so everybody wins. 
In just a few weeks my <a href="https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/the-honourable-stuart-ayres-mp-nsw-government-make-it-compulsory-to-advertise-auction-reserve-prices-to-stamp-out-underquoting-and-dummy-bidding" target="_blank">‘publish auction reserve prices’</a> petition has had hundreds of comments supporting the idea, but I believe it needs more support before the Minister is likely to look at the proposal - if you haven't already please take three minutes to read it and support it if you agree.   
Please let anyone you know who has recently purchased a property or who is currently searching for one know about it so they can also have their say! 
Patrick Bright is the founder of Sydney-based buyer’s agency <a href="https://%20www.epspropertysearch.com.au/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">EPS Property Search</a>.
Patrick is the author of four best-selling real estate books known as “The Insider’s Guide to Buying Real Estate Series.”
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.epspropertysearch.com.au/" rel="nofollow">www.epspropertysearch.com.au</a>.
</body></html>

pbright-aNtgvRfvJN

Queensland's price guide bans don't go far enough, what we need is real transparency

<html><body>
The proposed Queensland price guide ban is back on the radar, with a number of industry members speaking out in support of the legislation.
For those who are not aware of the potential changes, you can<a href="/news/new-queensland-legislation-to-leave-buyers-without-price-guides-reinsw"> see the passage in the legislation that has caused the outcry in this article here</a>.
Damian Hackett, CEO of Place Estate Agents, has said that banning the price guides will not make a significant change from what is currently in place, and will improve the professionalism of the real estate industry.
In fact, said Hackett, putting a price guide on an auction is contrary to its intended purpose – to let the market determine the final value of the property.
<blockquote>
DEBATE POINT: Is putting a price guide on an auction contrary to its intended purpose?
</blockquote>
“The notion of putting a price or a price range on a property going to auction is the reverse of what the process is trying to achieve,” he said.
Director of Place, and <a href="https://www.reiq.com/about-us/board-members" target="_blank">board director of the REIQ</a>, Paul Curtain, said that many currently did not put price guides on auctions – which is the intention of the current legislation.
“The current legislation was designed to move away from price guides, but over time it has been interpreted differently – it confused people,” he said.
“If you read it a particular way it allows for a price guide to be advertised, as long as you have the vendor’s permission in writing and some agents were interpreting it in this way.”
Hackett continued by noting that vendors still do have the option of providing a price guide.
“A seller should absolutely have the right to put a price on their property, but in simple terms, if they want to do this then it should be taken to the market via a tender campaign, rather than an auction.”
<blockquote>
DEBATE POINT: Vendors can still provide price guides by opting for private treaty sales
</blockquote>
Unsurprisingly, this echoes official sentiments from the Real Estate Institute of Queensland's CEO,<a href="/news/qld/letter-from-the-editor-more-information-not-less-please-queensland"> Anton Kardash, who said that other auctions go ahead without price guides</a>.
"Art, horses and motor vehicles, to name but a few, are regularly auctioned without a fixed price or a price guide because that is the very nature of auctions. The market will decide on the day of auction what it is prepared to pay for that particular asset," he said.
"It should also be highlighted that if a seller wishes to market a property with a price or using a price guide, they may do so by instructing their agent to sell via the much more popular private treaty method."
Curtain said that the changes would “tidy up” ambiguity at present, and help with the policing of real estate agents in the way they represent pricing, which in the past led to a lot of misrepresentation and complaints from disadvantaged consumers.
<blockquote>
DEBATE POINT: Currently there is ambiguity in the legislation that needs clearing up.
</blockquote>
“Agents would lead a buyer to a property on which they’d underquoted by 10 to 20% and the buyer would go the expense of getting building inspections and the like and then on auction day would realise they weren’t even in the running for the property,” he said.
“Essentially banning auction price guides is designed entirely to safeguard consumers and ensure we don’t return to those dark ages of misrepresentation. Arguments for price guides to be allowed potentially takes us back to those days, and this is something we categorically do not want.”
In fact, Curtain also pointed to other states as perpetrators, again much like the REIQ’s stance.
“It is with great pride that Queensland can say that it has largely avoided claims of misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to property price guides. Unlike in some other states where such complaints are rife, Queensland has not been subject to constant complaints of such a nature and will continue to prevent any future issues with the passing of this legislation,” said Kardash.
It appears Curtain agrees with this.
<blockquote>
DEBATE POINT: Other states are rife with underquoting, and they have price guides.
</blockquote>
“Certainly in other states underquoting is a huge problem – it has almost become the norm in states like Victoria for a price to be quoted and the property to sell above that level, sometimes significantly above, and this is only disadvantageous to the consumer,” said Curtain.
Hackett said that Place applauded the Property Occupations Bill 2013, with much of the other changes resulting in the reduction of red tape, despite the “controversy” surrounding price guides.
“Most of the members of the REIQ are supportive of the Bill as a whole, as are the majority of real estate agents, and indeed even consumers,” he said.
“The only issue that has been blown out of proportion is the section clarifying the rules surrounding auction price guides, but overall people are excited about the changes as a whole.”
Meanwhile, managing director of RE/MAX Australia, Michael Davoren, has urged the Queensland government to “stick with their plan and legislate for there to be no price indicators… despite a small number of people publicly lobbying for the opposite.”
One person publicly speaking for the other side of the argument is McGrath Estate Agents’ John McGrath, who has <a href="/news/qld/dark-ages-descending-on-queensland-as-auction-price-guide-ban-defies-common-sense-john-mcgrath">taken out full page advertisements in Queensland newspapers to argue against the proposal</a>.
"It does the people of Queensland a great disservice, in my opinion, to deny them such a fundamental right when it comes to the most important financial asset that any of us will ever own,” said McGrath.
"The banning of price guides will be a barrier to business for this great state. We should be open for business. Making it easy for others to research our property and invest in Queensland," he said.
However, despite the suggestion of a "small number" of people lobbying against the change, the REA and News Limited are also in opposition, and the <a href="/news/nsw/real-estate-institutes-go-head-to-head-over-queensland-auction-price-guide-debate">Real Estate Institute of New South Wales also spoke out against the ban</a>, suggesting that there is a heavy tide of opposition being faced. Notably, an online petition prompted by News Limited has <a href="https://www.change.org/en-AU/petitions/jarrod-bleije-mp-amend-proposed-legislation-aimed-at-banning-price-guides-on-properties-going-to-auction-in-qld?recruiter=83952376&amp;utm_campaign=signature_receipt&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=share_petition" target="_blank">achieved 1,918 signatures</a>.
Davoren said that the reality in the industry is that the topic has been debated at length, and most accept the REIQ’s position on having no price guidance.
“While I accept that real estate practitioners and commentators from other jurisdictions can express an opinion on Queensland real estate, their own systems are far from perfect with cases of over quoting and underquoting regularly brought to public and legal attention,” said Davoren.
Despite this, it appears it’s uncertain how many agents actually are underpricing.
<blockquote>
DEBATE POINT: Could providing reserve prices one week before auction be an alternative solution?
</blockquote>
“A minority of agents are over quoting to the seller but then underpricing when going to the public – there is no transparency in that,” he said.
“The Bill proposes that an agent or auctioneer can provide a comparative market analysis in writing with the written consent of the seller and at the direct request of the buyer,” he said.
“We’ve invested so much already into making our real estate industry as transparent as possible; to encourage the use of price indicators is a backward step.”
He also said that, contrary to what some have been saying, the Bill will not stop buyers from using real estate portals to find properties in their price range, with any search parameter based on the property’s price range to be seen as a “search tool only” and not taken as the agent’s pricing guide or opinion.
Another solution to the underquoting issue has been suggested through the publishing of reserve prices a week out from the auction date. An <a href="/news/nsw/real-estate-institutes-go-head-to-head-over-queensland-auction-price-guide-debate">online petition for this change in New South Wales is circulating, launched by buyer’s agent Patrick Bright</a>, and has seen vocal support from SQM Research’s Louis Christopher. Bright has suggested to Property Observer that should the model be successful in New South Wales, other states may be interested to implement it.
Observer Terry Ryder, based in Queensland, has also been vocal on the issue of the Queensland price guide ban, <a href="/expert-insights/buying/dont-like-the-auction-price-guidance-ban-you-can-only-blame-yourself">telling those who dislike the ban that they can only blame themselves</a>.
</body></html>

Queensland price guide ban garners support, with claims debate is “blown out of proportion”

<html><body>
The much discussed practice of underquoting, or bait pricing, has attracted the interest of Consumer Affairs Victoria, who have announced they will be keeping a close eye on the property market, and specifically auctions, this autumn season.
The practice of underquoting, much-discussed on Property Observer, has director of Consumer Affairs Victoria Claire Noone set to catch out real estate agents misleading prospective buyers. This is timely, considering the potential Queensland change to legislation to stop all price guides at auction in <a href="/news/qld/letter-from-the-editor-more-information-not-less-please-queensland">a bid to solve the issue of underquoting that the REIQ claims is rampant in the auction-heavy capitals</a>.
"In this peak auction period, we are gathering market intelligence through online monitoring and other data collection methods," Noone said. 
"We will be watching for any misconduct during the buying and selling process - from the moment a property is advertised to when deposits are paid and held in trust accounts.”
She also expressed that staff would be attending auctions to ensure they are “conducted according to auction rules”. Property Observer welcomes this attention into the issue, particularly surrounding the announced attention being paid to indicators of misleading price advertising and campaigns.
However, Noone also urged prospective buyers to ready themselves with auction rules, including price advertising and underquoting, prior to attending auction so that they can be prepared.
"Comparing the initial advertised price with the sale price is not evidence of underquoting," Noone explained. 
"Underquoting is when an agent misleads a prospective buyer about the likely selling price of a property for sale.”
She explained that examples of this included when a property is advertised or quoted to a prospective buyer at a price lower than the seller’s asking price or auction reserve price, the agent’s estimate of the selling price or a genuine offer or expression of interest.
Property Observer recently attended a Sydney auction that was potentially a case of underquoting, with a reserve price set some $200,000 above the price guide.
Noone also reminded buyers that, at auction, you will not be able to make a contract subject to conditions and that there is no cooling off period.
Underquoting is a regularly debated topic. Recently, <a href="/expert-insights/investing/underquoting-the-auction-system-s-necessary-evil-mark-armstrong">observer Mark Armstrong referred to is as the auction system’s “necessary evil”</a>, meanwhile a petition has been started by buyer’s agent Patrick Bright for the <a href="/news/online-petition-for-mandatory-reserve-price-publishing-launched">mandatory publishing of reserve prices</a>.
</body></html>

Price Guides

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Price Guides

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News