Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.

Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;

David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;

“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;

Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;

At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.

Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.

Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.

David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.

“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;

Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;

Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;

However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.

Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;

Joel Robinson

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.

The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.

Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.

“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.

“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" />

Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.

The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.

“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.

“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" />

Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.

“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.

The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.

“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”

The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.

The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.

Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.

Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.

The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.

“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.

“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.

“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”

The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.

“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”

From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.

“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”

The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.

“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.

Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.

“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.

“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”

The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.

“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.

Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.

&nbsp;

Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

Lending

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Everyday, prompted by pressure from the government, banks are changing their lending policies. What happens if, last week, your bank indicates you will get a loan approval, but this week they decline you?
Let’s face it, if the lending manager from the local branch declines you, they are hardly likely to want to send you to the competition. And, even if they were being generous and wanted to point you in the right direction, how would they know what their competitors’ lending policies were?
This is the benefit of using a Mortgage Broker. Brokers know which lenders will lend what, and to whom.
And, in a rapidly-changing world, really good brokers stay in close-touch with the banks and lenders so that they are ready for lending policy changes; that way clients don’t have the rug pulled from under them.
This is particularly the case with the reputable non-bank lenders who can match the Big Four for rates and products but are not facing the same government restrictions. 
When you are choosing which mortgage broker to go with, you may want to ask them key questions such as:
<ul>
<li>How often do they attend Professional Development sessions</li>
<li>How many lenders do they have on their panel</li>
<li>Which non-bank lenders are on their panel</li>
<li>Are they part of a wider group where fellow brokers share industry tips and updates</li>
<li>How long have group members been in the mortgage broking profession</li>
</ul>
 
Jenna Ford is partner, Chan &amp; Naylor Finance and can be contacted <a href="https://www.chan-naylor.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Is your home loan out of date? Jenna Ford

<html><body>
A report from ASIC has found lenders offering interest-only mortgages need to lift game to comply with consumer protection laws.
ASIC's probe into interest-only home loans was announced in December 2014 and assessed how 11 lenders, including the big four banks, are complying with responsible lending laws.
The report recommends that lenders and brokers should review to ensure compliance with responsible lending obligations. All 11 lenders have changed their practices in line with ASIC's recommendations or have committed to implementing them. The recommendations include:
<ul>
<li>Loans align with consumers' requirements and objectives</li>
<li>Lenders use a consumers' actual expenses rather than relying on a benchmark</li>
<li>Affordability assessments include buffers for future interest rate rises.</li>
</ul>
According to ASIC, demand for interest-only loans had grown by around 80% since 2012 and the review looked at how consumers were assessed for loans by lenders with a focus on the affordability of the loans over the longer term.
The review found that interest-only loans are more popular with investors and those on higher incomes, and that delinquency rates are currently lower for interest-only home loans.
ASIC found lenders have not been meeting all responsible lending obligations in the provision of interest-only loans and often failing to consider whether an interest-only loan will meet a consumer's needs, particularly in the medium to long-term.
ASIC’s review of more than 140 consumer loan files from bank and non-bank lenders identified:
<ul>
<li>In 40% of files reviewed, the affordability calculations assumed the borrower had longer to repay the principal on the loan than they actually did</li>
<li>In over 30% of files reviewed, there was no evidence that the lender had considered whether the interest-only loan met the borrower's requirements</li>
<li>In over 20% of files reviewed, lenders had not considered the borrower’s actual living expenses when approving the loan, but relied instead on expenditure benchmarks</li>
</ul>
ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said interest-only loans may be a reasonable option for some borrowers. However, lenders must have robust processes in place for assessing a customer's ability to afford a loan, taking into account the increased repayments once the interest-only period ends.
"They should lend responsibly, and in a way that does not result in consumers taking on debt that they cannot afford, especially if interest rates rise," he said.
"We are pleased that the lenders involved in the review have already started implementing changes based on our findings. The rest of the lending industry, including brokers, should  now take note and swiftly review the practices they have in place to ensure they comply with their responsible lending obligations."
According to ASIC, based on a $500,000 principal and interest home loan over thirty years, a consumer would pay around $579,032 in interest with a constant interest rate of 6%. For an interest-only loan of the same amount, with the same interest rate consumers would pay the following:
<div align="center"> </div>
 
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="142">
Length of interest-only period
</td>
<td valign="top" width="113">
Interest payable over term of loan
</td>
<td valign="top" width="151">
Additional interest paid compared to   principal-and-interest home loan
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="142">
5 years
</td>
<td valign="top" width="113">
$616,258
</td>
<td valign="top" width="151">
$37,226
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="142">
10 years
</td>
<td valign="top" width="113">
$659,752
</td>
<td valign="top" width="151">
$80,720
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="142">
15 years
</td>
<td valign="top" width="113">
$709,503
</td>
<td valign="top" width="151">
$130,471
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</body></html>

ASIC demand lenders improve standards following interest-only loan review

<html><body>
Research from comparison website Mozo.com.au has found home loan fixed interest rates are being cut, especially for four and five year rates.
Large second-tier institutions, according to the Mozo Banking Insights Bulletin, have begun to increase three year rates.
The July report noted many more lenders were implementing recent investment lending legal changes.
<div dir="ltr">
<table style="width: 445px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
Rank
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Provider
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Product
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
Amount
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
Max LVR
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
Rate
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
1
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Mortgage House
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Pure &amp; Simple ULTRA Variable Home Loan (Owner Occupier)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$100000 to $500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
50%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.89
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
2
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Homestar
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Basic Refinance Loan (Principal &amp; Interest, Owner Occupier)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
70%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.94
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
3
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Freedomlend
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Variable Home Loan (Owner Occupier)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $1000000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.98
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
4
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Homestar
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Variable Rate Loan (Owner Occupier)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $1000000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
95%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.98
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
5
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Auswide Bank
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Home Loan Plus Special (Principal &amp; Interest) (Freedom Package)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$150000 to $3500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
90%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.99
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
6
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Easy Street
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Basic Variable Home Loan
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
From $100000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.99
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
7
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
iMortgage
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Fusion (Owner Occupier) (ProPack)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$500000 to $2000000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.99
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
8
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Mortgage House
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Pure &amp; Simple Variable Home Loan (Owner Occupier)
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$100000 to $500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.99
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
9
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
State Custodians
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Peak Performance Offset
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$500000 to $1500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
3.99
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
10
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
loans.com.au
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Dream Home Loan Essentials
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $750000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
4.02
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
11
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Mortgage View
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Variable Rate Super Special
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$150000 to $1500000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
75%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
4.02
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
12
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
iMortgage
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Essential Home Loan
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $750000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
4.04
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
13
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
loans.com.au
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Dream Home Loan Offset Variable
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$50000 to $2000000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
80%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
4.06
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap width="41">
14
</td>
<td nowrap width="78">
Yellow Brick Road
</td>
<td nowrap width="171">
Rate Smasher
</td>
<td nowrap width="65">
$100000 to $750000
</td>
<td nowrap width="41">
70%
</td>
<td nowrap width="50">
4.06
 
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
</div>
 
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Fixed home loan rates being trimmed: Mozo

<html><body><div id="post-729" class="post">
<div class="entry">
April 24th, 2015 was a significant date in the Australian property investment landscape. Why? On this date, APRA (the Australian Macro Prudential Authority – an institution who helps regulates the rules of play for banks and other kinds of lenders) implemented some new rules / codes of conducts for lenders to adhere to.
The new rules mean that for some lenders who previously had very liberal lending rules and practices for local Australian property investors; had to tighten them up to comply with APRA’s policies.
Whilst it is still early days; we have seen a number of “Big 4″ lenders, as well as many other tier #2 and tier #3 lenders, begin to implement more restrictive borrowing rules for investor-based loans.
These have come in all shapes and sizes, such as (but not limited to):
- Restricting maximum LVR (loan to value ratio) allowance for ‘investment’ category mortgages from, say, 90/10 to 80/20. Part and parcel with this has been some lenders refusing to allow LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) as a capitalised cost on to loans at those higher (say, 90/10) LVR ratios.
- Removal of discounted interest rate package deals for their mortgage products; again, for investor-only mortgages (many lenders have retained discounts for owner-occupied, or PPOR – Principal place of residence – loan products)
- In light of further interest rate cuts from the RBA in recent months; some lenders have; whilst passing on rate ‘cuts’ not actually reduced their ‘calculation of repayment capability’ for mortgage applicants. What this means is, let’s say when interest rates were 0.50 basis points higher, several months ago, and lenders were calculating an applicant’s serviceability based on a scenario where interest rates spiraled to say, 7% (they run these calculations as standard for all applicants); typically when RBA rates drop by 0.50 basis points; so too should the lender’s serviceability calculation assumptions (I.e. their calculation should be using a rate of say 6.50%, not 7%). However, lenders in recent months have maintained say that 7% figure in that calculation.
These changes have substantial implications for would-be property investors: 
1) The reduced LVR allowance by lenders means borrowers need to cough up more initial deposit. Say you wanted to borrow to buy a $300K investment property. Some lenders at 90/10 LVR acceptance would only require your $30K (10%) deposit, plus purchase costs. A drop to 80/20 means borrowers need to find another $30K to make up a $60K deposit.
2) Removal of discounted interest rates also is a deterrent to first-time investors entering the market, as their interest repayments will now be slightly higher than what home owners pay. There could thus be a cooling of investors being active in many markets throughout Australia.
3) For investors who remain active or don’t perceive the above two changes to inhibit their ambitions; they’ll continue with their property investment purchases. However, they simply won’t be allowed to borrow as much. If banks are calculating serviceability based on a higher ‘worst case scenario’ forecast; the banks won’t lend as much. To some investors, this could be the difference between being allowed to buy a $500K investment property, to now only perhaps $320K – $350K. If this eventuates, this will be a game-changer in the market as it’ll wipe a lot of the Sydney and Melbourne potential investor buyers out (who can play in the Sydney and Melbourne markets with &gt;$350K, these days) and into lower-median markets such as Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart, and some regional centers.
The role of foreign investors in amongst APRA rules for local lenders: 
And what of the foreign investors? What will be the effect on foreign investor demand of APRA-inflicted local bank and non-bank lender restrictions on investment-based loans? This is hard to infer with any kind of concrete certainty; due to all data relating to foreign residential property investors (including actual volumes of them; types of financing etc.) not being readily available to the public.
As such, there is already speculation and confusion on just how many foreign investors are using the following kinds of financing for their Australian purchases:
a) Pure cash from overseas sources/local funds, to buy (no loans required). In this instance; APRA regulations on local lenders will have zero consequence on foreign buyers; or;
b) Financing/loans given by their local country’s lenders (in these instances; the lending rules imposed by APRA on local Australian institutions don’t apply – meaning foreigners may continue to have access to great cost-efficient mortgage products, for the purchase of Australian property); or;
c) Foreign buyers who are accessing local Australian lender mortgage products. For this type of foreign buyer; the APRA rules will have the same consequence as for local buyers.
When comparing drivers for foreign investors to local investors, we must be mindful that there are so many more variables beyond purely the loan or finance structure of choice, that affects their overall attraction to buying property in this country. For instance; exchange rates, FIRB levies or taxes they must pay, the type and condition of the housing stock they have access to, to purchase, are just a few of the many other factors related to foreign investor demand in this country’s residential housing stock.
So – and I must stress this is pure speculation based on the resources and news I’ve been reading on this subject – there are two quite likely outcomes I would speculate as a result of the tighter APRA rules on local lenders, in regards to the effect of these on foreign investor interest in the market, and on residential property values as a result:
1) Local buyers (investors, not home owners) get scared off and this takes a substantial amount of ‘heat’ out of 'most' markets. I say ‘most’, because the exception (as in; the markets that will still remain hot despite the APRA rulings) will be the foreign-investor ‘obsessed’ postcodes around Australia. These are the suburbs built in areas where foreign buyers and local buyers alike; both highly desire to purchase in. I say this because though we don’t know what foreign investors are using what finance structures; a more consistent and reliable metric of measurement here, is the actual postcodes they take interest in buying within.
2) Or, more markets will remain hot anyway. Why? Because those wannabe local first home buyers (FHB’s) who were thinking of applying the recently growing strategy of ‘Keep renting and buy an investment property now instead of a home; to kick start some growth so I can have enough money for a home deposit later on’, will throw that strategic approach straight out the window and say ‘nope, forget investment, the APRA rules don’t make it worth the effort; I’m going to go for that home purchase straight off the bat; better rates, discounts, and possibly LVR’s (depending on their chosen lender…) so I might as well go ‘all-in’ and buy my dream home’. 
Unfortunately, for FHB’s who want to buy into suburbs that also happen to double as hotbeds for foreign buyers; the same bubbling of high housing prices will remain, and continue further. However, in this instance, opportunity could present for FHB’s buying in non-foreign-buyer postcodes, as the local investor volumes will dilute, which should deflate the bubble in those other postcodes enough to help FHB’s.
So, if either of these outcomes eventuate, I think it can only be a good thing for FHB’s, and less so for local investors. Foreign investors will likely remain unperturbed in their relentless pursuit of the postcodes that they so desire.
This means that in postcodes where the top 10-20 schools are, per-state (the ones where the Chinese investors specifically, are most active); prices will likely remain as high as ever.
 Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, Property Correspondent. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/contact-us/" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</div>
</div></body></html>

Lending

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Lending

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News