<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/broadbeach-qld-4218">Broadbeach</a> offers plenty of reasons to live vertically, but moving from a substantial family home into an apartment can expose the compromises of high-density living. Privacy, room for guests and usable living space tend to matter more when an apartment is intended as a permanent home rather than an occasional coastal base.

A typical residential floor at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-eveleigh-broadbeach-7-9-surf-parade-broadbeach-qld-4218">The Eveleigh</a>, on Surf Parade,&nbsp;contains just four apartments. The 94-residence development by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hirsch-faigen">Hirsch &amp; Faigen</a> is predominantly made up of expansive three-bedroom homes, with a limited collection of half-floor penthouses above.

Across the apartment floors, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a> has used the relatively limited number of residences to give each home greater access to natural light and outlook. Living spaces extend towards full-height glazing, while a series of bay windows frame selected views across the Pacific Ocean, city and hinterland rather than treating the building edge as a continuous wall of glass.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360965]

“The apartment floors deliver a collection of homes that embrace controlled outlook via a series of bay windows deliberately framing moments of view,” Rothelowman Director Kim Lowman said.

From outside, those projecting forms contribute to the tower’s faceted profile. Strong horizontal and vertical elements establish its proportions, while the changing position of the sun alters the light, shadow and reflection across the façade throughout the day.

The same attention moves inside the apartments, where the material palette combines warm timber, natural stone, metallic detailing and softer curved forms. Kitchens sit within the main living zone, with stone island benches, integrated joinery and European appliances, before the living areas extend towards the glazing and the outlook.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360981]

Three genuine bedrooms provide room to accommodate family and guests, while two secure car spaces and storage address some of the practical considerations that can become more noticeable when moving from a larger home. Feedback from the display suite has centred on the warmth and restraint of the interiors, with buyers commenting that the residences feel like homes rather than conventional coastal apartments.

A limited collection of half-floor penthouses occupies the upper levels, increasing the scale of the living spaces and adding private balconies and elevated finishes. From this position, the outlook extends between the ocean and hinterland.

Outside the private residences, The Eveleigh separates its shared spaces between the podium and rooftop. The podium is centred on wellness, with subtropical landscaping surrounding a swimming pool and pool terrace, yoga garden, private gymnasium, sauna and hot and cold plunge facilities. Landscaped retreats and pavilions provide additional places to sit away from the main recreation areas.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360966]

Higher in the building, a rooftop pavilion and private dining suite sit alongside resident lounge, barbecue and outdoor dining areas, opening towards panoramic views across the ocean, city and hinterland.

“Buyers are no longer just looking for an apartment, but a lifestyle where they can relax, reset, and enjoy a balanced way of living,” Hirsch &amp; Faigen Director of Sales Matt George said.

Interest to date has come from established owner-occupiers and interstate lifestyle purchasers, including buyers planning a future move to the Gold Coast. Many are coming from larger homes and want to reduce ongoing maintenance without giving up space for family and guests, privacy, two car spaces or the ability to entertain at home.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149670 project_image_fid=360969]

Much of that daily life can also take place beyond the building without requiring a drive. Kurrawa Beach and Pratten Park are an easy walk from Surf Parade, while Pacific Fair, Oracle Boulevard, The Oasis, restaurants, cafés, entertainment and public transport are also within walking distance.

The Eveleigh is Hirsch &amp; Faigen's fourth Gold Coast development since entering the market in 2021, following The Hemingway at Palm Beach, The Emerson at Kirra and Yves at Mermaid Beach. Each of the preceding projects sold out before completion.

“Broadbeach had been on our radar throughout our time operating on the Gold Coast,” the developer said. “Following our projects in Palm Beach, Kirra and Mermaid Beach, Broadbeach represented the natural next step for the business.”

The Surf Parade site brought together proximity to the beach, protected coastal outlooks and walkability to dining, shopping and recreation. Hirsch &amp; Faigen also identified the street as an emerging premium residential address, with enough separation from Broadbeach's busier destinations to retain a quieter environment at home.

The Eveleigh is now under construction by Maxcon, with completion forecast for mid-2028. Three-bedroom residences are currently available from $2.87 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=149670]

Joel Robinson

The Eveleigh brings house-like apartments to Broadbeach

A long-stalled Campbelltown development site is back in play, with new plans for 139 apartments set to supersede a mixed-use scheme approved almost a decade ago but never built.

The new proposal for 28 Cordeaux Street would deliver 116 market and 23 affordable apartments in a part 14-storey building, bringing a substantial new project into a Campbelltown market where new apartment supply remains limited.

Plans have been filed over the 3,092 sqm corner site at Moore-Oxley Street, around 600 metres from Campbelltown Railway Station and the city-centre retail core.

The site already carries a mixed-use residential approval dating to 2016. Doroch Architects has now been engaged on a larger replacement scheme, which is progressing as a State Significant Development Application following a Housing Delivery Authority determination in August 2025.

The apartment mix comprises 39 one-bedroom, 72 two-bedroom and 28 three-bedroom residences. Two-bedroom apartments make up just over half of the project, while three-bedroom homes account for 20 per cent.

<img alt="First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="136dd5b9-3791-4da6-9e31-76f533f5b4de" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Campbelltown%20da2.png?VersionId=LgOSy9nwf5u.MGswBBwaGGxuX8QpHSl_" />

Of the 139 apartments, 23 will be delivered as affordable housing under the in-fill affordable housing provisions of the Housing SEPP. The affordable component represents 15 per cent of the residential gross floor area and will be managed by a registered Community Housing Provider.

Doroch has sought to break the scale of the building into two distinct elements, with a masonry podium of around four storeys establishing the street edge before the residential tower steps back above.

The corner position has shaped that approach. Cordeaux Street faces toward the commercial and civic centre, while Moore-Oxley Street leads into the lower-scale residential neighbourhood to the south, and the design verification report describes the site as "bridging the commercial core to the north and established residential areas to the south."

The podium will be expressed predominantly in face brick, while the upper levels shift to brushed and grooved concrete cladding with darker metal detailing. Recessed sections, deep balcony edges and landscaping break down the upper form, with an approximately 11.8-metre setback to the northern boundary addressing the adjoining St Peters Anglican School.

<img alt="First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c8b3d2d3-c561-4bfc-a5d9-a68c0c10dac1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Campbelltown%20da1.png?VersionId=AeAEyJU02Gk2k5noUj2StziCvdQ7fW4B" />

Campbelltown has been starved of new residential developments in the last decade.

The only other notable development set to come to market this year is ALAND's Queen Square, a mixed-use precinct on over two hectares that will comprise apartments above a vibrant ground-level retail and hospitality dining precinct.

First look: New 139-apartment plans revive long-stalled Campbelltown city centre site

First Look: Sherlock Construction pitches apartments for low-rise Deception Bay

Queensland builder-developer MAYD has revealed the first look at its major North Kirra beachfront development, lodging amended plans that reduce the number of apartments and increase the proportion of larger residences.

The project is planned across a substantial 4,742 sqm amalgamated site spanning seven lots at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/2-6-pacific-parade-bilinga-qld-4225">2-6 Pacific Parade</a> and 27-33 Golden Four Drive in Bilin​ga, directly opposite Nor​th Kirra Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mayd-group">MAYD</a> secured the site for $32.5 million in 2025, in what was one of the Gold Coast's largest property transactions of the year.

The development will be delivered across two stages, with the first stage carrying an estimated gross realisation value of around $360 million.

The latest amendments seek to reduce the overall apartment count and shift the project further toward the owner-occupier market, with larger residences designed for buyers wanting considerably more space than traditionally offered in a beachfront apartment.

The residential mix will include townhomes, oversized two-bedroom apartments, substantial three-bedroom residences and four-bedroom homes.

MAYD has appointed Cera Stribley to lead the architecture and interiors, with the Melbourne-based design practice drawing on the beachfront setting through a series of ocean-facing terraces and heavily landscaped balconies.

Strong horizontal forms and curved balconies will define the exterior, with subtropical landscaping integrated throughout the building to soften the built form and increase the connection between the residences and the beachfront.

The project will also include an extensive collection of resident wellness and lifestyle facilities, continuing the broader shift across the Gold Coast's luxury apartment market toward larger homes supported by resort-style amenity.

<img alt="MAYD" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1bcbb05-e659-4b47-8bd4-1e595315e2ad" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%202.05.03%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=jj0XEud1X1DuLt7_KyElhjMdZGOXmLHP" />

MAYD Founder Todd Mould said North Kirra was increasingly appealing to buyers attracted to the more established, lower-density character of the southern Gold Coast.

"North Kirra presents one of the most compelling luxury residential opportunities currently emerging in Australia, combining absolute beachfront with the character and authenticity that buyers are increasingly seeking, and the same sense of tight-knit community that defined Burleigh and Currumbin perhaps 10 or 15 years ago," Mould said.

"With Gold Coast Airport on its doorstep, it also offers a level of accessibility that broadens its appeal across almost every market demographic."

The project comes as the southern Gold Coast continues to attract an increasing share of high-end apartment development and buyer activity.

Kirra in particular has emerged as one of the region's more tightly held beachfront markets, with its relatively low-density character, established surf and hospitality scene and proximity to Gold Coast Airport differentiating it from the higher-density markets further north.

Mould said those characteristics had informed the approach MAYD and Cera Stribley had taken to the project.

"We've worked closely with Cera Stribley to create a vision that is deeply connected to its surroundings," he said.

"Inspired by the coastline itself, the architecture has been shaped around space, privacy and resort-style living, creating a collection of homes that reflects the next generation of luxury on the southern Gold Coast."

MOTIV Managing Director Carly Cottam, who has been appointed to market the project, said buyer attention had continued to move south along the Gold Coast.

"Purchasers who may once have defaulted to Broadbeach, Main Beach or Surfers Paradise are increasingly recognising the value of a genuine beachfront location that offers lower density, strong amenity and a more established sense of community," Cottam said.

"Kirra has a powerful combination of growing demand and genuine scarcity. Beachfront supply is inherently constrained, the area remains relatively low density, and buyers are increasingly placing a premium on locations that feel established, uncrowded and authentic rather than heavily developed."

Cottam said the proximity to Gold Coast Airport was also proving increasingly important for interstate and second-home buyers.

"Being minutes from Gold Coast Airport makes it particularly compelling for interstate buyers, frequent travellers and second-home purchasers who can access an authentic coastal lifestyle almost immediately after stepping off a flight."

The acquisition takes MAYD's active development portfolio to more than $500 million, with the North Kirra project representing one of its largest undertakings to date.

MAYD is targeting an early 2027 launch.

First look at MAYD's North Kirra mixed-use precinct

<main data-perf-region="main">
Castle Hill, the longtime hub of the Hills District, has been one of the major beneficiaries of Sydney's Metro expansion, with improved connectivity helping drive continued population growth, development and buyer demand across the Hills District.

But despite that growth, the suburb has seen relatively few major new apartment projects brought to market over the past 18 months.

Hills District developer Reve Group is looking to fill that gap with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nova-r-ve-castle-hill-2-garthowen-crescent-castle-hill-nsw-2154">Nova Rêve</a>, a major new mixed-use precinct on the corner of Garthowen Crescent and Old Castle Hill Road, a short walk from Castle Hill Metro Station and Castle Towers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377679]

The project will comprise three residential towers alongside a hotel, restaurants, cafes and a skybar, more than 1,600 sqm of ground-floor retail and almost an acre of landscaped gardens.

It represents the largest project undertaken by Reve Group, the development arm of the Kassis family, which has been building across the Hills District for more than 30 years through Kassis Homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377675]

Nova Rêve also represents a significant step up from the family's first apartment development, Grand Rêve, which was delivered nearby on Garthowen Crescent.

Grand Rêve introduced larger, house-like apartment layouts and premium inclusions including Wolf and Sub-Zero appliances to the Castle Hill market.

Nova Rêve takes that approach to a precinct scale, combining the residential component with hospitality, retail and substantial public and resident landscaping.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377685]

Reve Group Managing Director Sam Kassis said the project reflected the family's three decades of building in the Hills, which has evolved from trophy homes on quarter-acre blocks to larger-scale apartment development.

"Grand Rêve was our first apartment project here and it showed us what this pocket of Castle Hill could be. Nova Rêve is the refinement of that idea: not just apartments, but a place the whole suburb can use," Kassis said.

A key part of that approach is the hotel, which has been designed to operate as an amenity for the wider Castle Hill community rather than solely hotel guests.

It will include restaurants, cafes, skybars and all-day dining, alongside conference and event facilities catering to business functions, community groups and private events.

At ground level, more than 1,600 sqm of shops and cafes will open onto the surrounding streets and landscaped areas.

Almost an acre of gardens designed by Land and Form Studios will run through the precinct, incorporating pathways, seating, barbecue areas and children's play spaces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377680]

Reve Group's Romio Georges said creating an active ground plane had been central to the planning of Nova Rêve.

"There are gardens with pathways, barbecues, seating and play areas, shops and cafes opening onto the street, and a hotel with restaurants and a skybar that anyone in Castle Hill can walk into," Georges said.

The project's elevated position on one of Sydney's highest ridgelines will also provide apartments with outlooks toward the Sydney skyline, surrounding parkland and the Blue Mountains.

More than 80 per cent of the apartments will occupy corner positions, with Turner responsible for both the architecture and interiors.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152737]

<h3 data-end="3697" data-section-id="q3n5ak" data-start="3672">&nbsp;</h3>
</main>

Nova Rêve arrives as Reve Group bets on Castle Hill's next growth phase

Legal

<html><body>
A former broker has been handed an eight year, nine-month sentence for a $1.9 million fraud related to his company Adelaide Lending Centre.
The district court judge who handed down the sentence to former broker Michael Samra has described the $1.9 million case as “a consistent and persistent demonstration of fraud” through actions that were “premeditated, deliberate and repetitive”.
In the final ruling, Her Honour Judge Geraldine Davison described the circumstances which led to Samra pleading guilty to six counts of deception, according to the Mortgage Broker.
Samra’s broking business, Adelaide Lending Centre (ALC Group), was formed on July 13, 1999 at which time Samra was co-director and shareholder along with his wife. He became the sole director on 19 May 2009.
ALC Group was placed into voluntary liquidation on August 6, 2009 after a letter of demand. The liquidation was completed on August 19, 2015.
Meanwhile, Samra himself became bankrupt on 3 March 2010 and was discharged from bankruptcy on 30 October 2013.
Samra's modus operandi included getting a number of individuals to invest funds which would then be lent to clients in the building industry with promises of high interest rates (30% for 30 days). However, Judge Davison gave several examples of how these funds did not make it to either builders or developers and were instead paid to other investors dealing with the firm.
The fact that funds were immediately sent out to various investors meant that Samra was effectively “robbing Peter to pay Paul”, she said.
“There is ongoing litigation by some creditors to recover moneys lost in their investments with the ALC Group. The total amount of money invested with the group by the investors who are the subject of the charges totals just over $1.9 million,” the judge said.
“Contrary to the representations that had been made by you in January 2009, the amount of $150,000 and the amounts of $50,000 and $70,000 were not lent to builders or developers but instead were paid to other investors in the ALC Group,” she said of one case.
ASIC began investigating the ALC Group in September 2009.
“ASIC investigated the collapse of your group and conducted a reconstruction in relation to the invested deposits through your group for the period from 1 January to 31 July 2009. That reconstruction shows that in that period there were deposits into your bank account totalling over $66m. Investor deposits totalled $58m and there were further miscellaneous deposits of over $7m,” the judge said. 
ASIC found that payments from Samra’s bank account totalled over $67 million with payments from investors equalling $64 million.
In determining the sentence, Davison considered the impact of these actions on investors with ALC Group.
“These people have been generally hardworking individuals who have been striving to do their best to provide for their families and their own retirements,” she said. 
“Each of them has been significantly financially disadvantaged by your behaviour. Beyond that, of course, they have the devastation and stress that comes from financial difficulties and the effect of having so badly judged the situation as they see it.” 
“You knew that you had this significant financial difficulty that was unlikely to be resolved when you sought and obtained the funds that were used to prop up the business, knowing at the time when you obtained them that there was little, perhaps no prospect that they would be repaid.” 
Davison did acknowledge Samra’s personal circumstances, noting that he had no ability to make reparations for his actions. She also recognised the stress Samra would have been under while trying to keep his business afloat. This led to two suicide attempts, hospitalisation and psychiatric treatment in July 2009.
“However, these factors, whilst they would have impaired your judgment significantly, do not mean that you were unaware of the nature and quality of your actions,” she said.
In deciding the sentence, Davison took into account a range of factors, including Samra’s apology and his previous good character, as well as the amount of money involved, a belated guilty plea, and a lack of any reparations made.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Former mortgage broker handed jail term for $1.9 million fraud

<html><body>
The commercial real estate firm, Burgess Rawson, has been found by a Melbourne court to have unlawfully fired an employee because she was pregnant and took leave days for illness.
Despite the company arguing that her dismissal was due to work performance issues, the Federal Circuit Court ruled that the administrative assistant was fired in the last week of her probation period because of pregnancy, taking personal and annual leave and being absent due to illness or injury.
In doing so, Burgess Rawson breached the Fair Work Act, it said.
The employee, Tiffany Mahajan, nee Reddy, was represented by Matthew Minucci with Clayton Utz her solicitor, while Burgess Rawson was represented by barrister Toby Borgeest who was assisted by solicitors, Abrahams Meese Lawyers.
Compensation is yet to be determined.
The worker joined the Burgess Rawson Melbourne office in December 2015 on a six-month probation as an administrative assistant.
Her role was to proof read valuation reports, ensuring that there were no spelling or grammatical errors, and format the reports, the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCCA/2017/1560" target="_blank">court judgement</a> shows.
She learnt about her pregnancy in January 2016, and informed the office at her three-month probation meeting in March 2016.
Her boss, Mr Perrin -- the leader of the valuations team -- did not raise any issues about her performance at the time.
Her three-month probation meeting was with Mr Perrin and Mr Silvester, who was a senior valuer employed by the respondent.
Mr Perrin told the court that, during that meeting, he told the applicant that she appeared to be “going alright”.
He conceded in cross-examination that he did not raise any performance concerns with the applicant at her three-month probation review.
The applicant claimed that, in fact, Mr Perrin praised her for her work ethic.
The court heard that between March and her dismissal on June 3, 2016, the last working day before her probation period was set to expire on June 6, the staff member took seven days of sick leave and four days of annual leave because of morning sickness and hospital appointments. On these occasions she says she notified the employer in advance, the judgement noted.
She was late to work by about five minutes around six or seven times over three months, the court heard, owing to Melbourne's public transport delays, the Smart Company website revealed in its reporting of the court judgement.
The court also reviewed the minutes from a directors meeting in April 2016, which mentioned the staff members name, followed by the words “6 months 6 June. Situation needs to be dealt with”.
The judge found that while there were other references to staff members with performance concerns, she was the only one who apparently needed to be “dealt with”.
The worker’s team leader told the court that by May, he had made the decision to terminate her employment due to poor performance and poor punctuality. He said her pregnancy, leave days and intention to take maternity leave formed no part of the decision to dismiss, but acknowledged he did not formally raise any concerns about performance with her prior to the dismissal.
The team leader also said that while informing her of the termination on June 3, he did not give further details about what performance concerns had arisen, but did say she was “unreliable”.
The worker claimed she was told: “Due to your current circumstances, your employment has become unreliable and we have decided not to continue with your employment”.
Despite denials the worker’s “circumstances” had been discussed in the dismissal meeting, Judge Heather Riley found it likely that this had taken place and that it “beggars belief” the worker’s employment could be considered “unreliable” on the basis of her being slightly late to work on a handful of occasions over three months.
The company had also raised concerns about the worker’s ability when it came to formatting valuation reports and ensuring consistency in valuation figures in these reports. However, the judge found this suggestion “preposterous”, saying errors in figures for valuation reports were the responsibility of the valuer who had prepared the numbers, not the administration assistant.
Riley ultimately ruled that the worker was dismissed because “she was pregnant, she took personal leave, she took annual leave and she was temporarily absent from work due to illness or injury”.
The court was told another employee who announced during her probation period that she was pregnant was retained in her employment, with arrangements to cover a period of maternity leave.
Mr Perrin told news.com.au he was “disappointed” with the outcome of the case, and that he would decide whether to appeal once the court had assessed the amount of damages the firm would have to pay to Ms Mahajan.
 
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Burgess Rawson unlawfully fired pregnant employee: Federal Court 

<html><body>
The securities regulator has banned a financial adviser from Orange, NSW for providing false information about a client to an insurer and also misleading others on superannuation products.
Darren Tindall has been banned by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission from providing financial services for five years after an investigation found he failed to comply with financial services laws.　
Tindall was an authorised representative of Roan Financial Group Pty Ltd between 9 May 2013 and 19 May 2014, and was based in Orange, NSW.
During the investigation, the ASIC found that he had:　
<ul>
<li>engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct on a client's behalf by failing to disclose their pre-existing medical conditions on an insurance application submitted to an insurer;　</li>
<li>engaged in dishonest conduct by not disclosing the medical conditions in transferring that insurance obtained to a new insurer; and 　</li>
<li>recklessly made misleading comparisons about superannuation products to four clients, which induced those clients to switch their superannuation.</li>
<li>　</li>
</ul>
ASIC deputy chair Peter Kell said, “ASIC will take action against financial advisers who have been dishonest or who mislead their clients, in order to increase public confidence in the financial services industry.”
Tindall’s appeal the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a stay on the ban was refused recently while a date for the hearing of review of ASIC's decision is yet to be set.
 
</body></html>

ASIC bans financial adviser for five years

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The Retail Leases Amendment (Review) Bill 2016 was introduced into NSW Parliament on 8 November 2016 and when enacted, this legislation may make substantial amendments to many of the provisions of the current legislation, the Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW) (RLA), governing most retail shop leases in New South Wales.
Some of the changes proposed by the Bill have been outlined below but first we must mention that some of the Bill is intended to have retrospective application:
Retrospective operation of amendments
Clause 38 of the Bill gives retrospective operation to the provisions of the Bill and extends the operation of the Bill to any leases and disclosure statements given, before the commencement of the amendments except as otherwise provided by the Bill.
Major Reform - Repealing the minimum five year term
The Bill removes the current minimum five year term for retail shop leases; the original intent of the introduction of a minimum five year term was to afford greater protection to the goodwill built up by a tenant and to protect the investment a tenant has made in fit out.
The result of getting rid of the five year minimum lease may be that more leases are being structured with shorter terms. Before the RLA, many retail leases were only 3 years but the new norm is now 5 years. The proposal gives greater flexibility to tenants to ask for longer or shorter terms however the potential for shorter terms may result in a greater turnover of tenancies. This may in turn have a detrimental impact on other tenants who are left behind when a key tenant does not elect for a longer term.
However the removal of this provision may save time and costs for both parties. The minimum five year term was not a benefit to tenants who sought a lease for less than five years as they would need to pay legal fees to obtain a s16(3) certificate from a lawyer to do so.
Exclusion of non-retail uses from RLA’s operation
The Bill excludes premises used wholly for certain non-retail purposes from the operation of the RLA. The excluded purposes are outlined in a new Schedule 1A and include the following (among other things):
<ul>
<li>ATMs;</li>
<li>Car parking;</li>
<li>Vending machines;</li>
<li>Public telephones;</li>
<li>Children’s ride machines;</li>
<li>Signage displays;</li>
<li>Internet booths;</li>
<li>Private post boxes;</li>
<li>Certain storage uses.</li>
</ul>
The Bill also removes an exclusion from the RLA for any premises in an office tower that forms part of a retail shopping centre. This means that the removal of the provision is not to include office towers; the reasoning is because the original exception was unnecessary as an office tower does not form part of a retail shopping centre simply because it is part of the same building. However the removal of this exception retrospectively may create practical issues where premises that have initially been deemed to be excluded under this provision now may no longer be excluded based on their factual circumstance. By functioning retrospectively the amendments would greatly burden those parties.
Additionally, the Bill asserts that the provisions will not apply to a retail shop that is a stall in a market unless the market is a permanent retail market.
Better Tenant Protection
Other changes proposed by the Bill include:
Disclosure Statements
<ul>
<li>
Landlords will be liable to pay compensation to tenants who terminate a lease in the first six months because they were not provided with a disclosure statement, or the disclosure statement was incomplete or false or misleading.
<ul>
<li>The compensation payable is the costs reasonably incurred by the tenant in entering into the lease, including expenditure in connection with the fit-out of the premises.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>A tenant is not required to pay outgoings unless that liability was disclosed in the landlord’s disclosure statement.</li>
</ul>
Disclosure of tenant’s financial obligation
<ul>
<li>If the landlord’s disclosure statement provides an estimate for an outgoing and the actual amount of the outgoing is more than the estimate, then if there was no reasonable basis for the estimate when the disclosure statement was provided, the tenant’s liability will be limited to the estimated amount, and all subsequent increases in outgoing will be limited by reference to the estimated amount.</li>
</ul>
Bank guarantees
<ul>
<li>
The landlord is required to return a bank guarantee to the tenant within 2 months after the tenant completes performance of obligations under the lease that are secured by the bank guarantee.
<ul>
<li>This allows the tenant to have certainty about the return of the bank guarantee, but also affords the landlord sufficient time to confirm compliance by a tenant with post-termination obligations.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
Online Transactions
<ul>
<li>Turnover rent must exclude revenue accrued from online transactions, except where goods or services are delivered or provided from the retail shop or where the transaction takes place while the customer is at the retail shop.</li>
<li>The tenant is not required to provide the lessor with information about online transactions except for transactions where goods or services are delivered or provided from the retail shop or where the transaction takes place while the customer is at the retail shop.</li>
</ul>
Mortgagee consent expenses
<ul>
<li>The tenant is no longer required to pay lease preparation expenses (including expenses incurred in obtaining mortgage consent to a lease) in connection with the granting, renewal or extension of a lease.</li>
</ul>
Employment Restrictions
<ul>
<li>The employment restrictions the landlord has over the lease is extended to impose on a tenant requirements for police and security checks for tenant’s employees or contractors carrying out works in the premises. However, this is only if the Registrar of Retail Tenancy Disputes has approved of their inclusion in the particular case.</li>
</ul>
Amendments that may benefit Landlords
Disclosure statement
<ul>
<li>The revised definition of outgoings extends the definition to fees charged by a landlord for services provided by the landlord ‘in connection with the management, operation, maintenance or repair of the retail shop building or land’.</li>
<li>A landlord’s disclosure statement may be amended if both parties agree in writing.</li>
</ul>
Other general amendments
Demolition
<ul>
<li>The protections afforded to a tenant when the lease is terminated on the grounds of a proposal to demolish the building are extended to termination on the grounds of proposed demolition of any part of the building. Proposed changes also clarify that termination on the proposed demolition is only permissible if the proposed demolition cannot be carried out practicably without vacant possession of the shop.</li>
</ul>
Assignment of lease
<ul>
<li>There is clarification on the procedure for obtaining the landlord’s consent to the assignment of a retail shop lease, however the provision still includes a deemed consent by the landlord if the landlord has not responded within 28 days from when the request for consent was made by the tenant or from when the tenant has complied with the requirements under the RLA.</li>
<li>Where a retail shop lease has been awarded by public tender, the landlord can refuse consent to assignment of the lease if the proposed assignee fails to meet any criteria of the tender.</li>
</ul>
Jurisdiction of the Tribunal
<ul>
<li>There is an expansion of existing power of the jurisdiction of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal and an increase to the monetary limit for claims arising under the RLA from $400,000 to $750,000.</li>
</ul>
Lease execution and registration 
<ul>
<li>The time period for which the landlord is required to provide the tenant with a signed copy of the lease has increased from 1 month to 3 months.</li>
<li>Leases for a term of more than 3 years will be required to be registered, and must be lodged for registration within 3 months after the executed lease is returned to the landlord.</li>
</ul>
Conclusion
Currently there is no guarantee that this Bill will be passed, and the Bill will likely undergo further discussion and amendments before it is enacted. Parties involved in retail leases as tenants or landlords however should be aware of the potential changes to the Bill as they will be expected to comply with the new requirements when the Bill is passed as the legislation will not only apply to future retail leases but also leases entered into before the enactment of the legislation.
Gary Newton is partner TressCox Lawyers and Henry Yuan is paralegal. Both can be contacted <a href="https://www.tresscox.com.au/page/our-expertise/property/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Proposed amendments to the NSW Retail Leases Act may affect retail landlords, tenants 

<html><body>
<h1> </h1>
GUEST OBSERVER
Having been a lawyer looking after farmers and graziers for almost 40 years, I have focused on the future of family farms all my professional life – indeed, my practice and those of the other lawyers in our Agribusiness team depends upon it.
The issues facing agriculture in Australia are well known – droughts, floods, fire, depressed prices, labour shortages, too much debt, government interference (tree clearing and live export bans to name but two), declining terms of trade, the high Australian dollar, the average age of our primary producers etc etc.
As a general observation, while undoubtedly the average age of our primary producers is high, the next generation are well placed to capitalise on the world's increasing need for protein and Asia's growing prosperity – they are technologically savvy and have access to resources, training etc (that their forebears could only look upon with envy) to ensure that the farms of the future will be sustainable both financially and environmentally.
I was asked a few years ago what I thought was the biggest issue facing primary producers and my considered response was "lack of communication". Farmers and graziers are, by their very nature, stoics – they have to be to cope with the myriad of challenges thrown at them. They know how to "tighten their belts" in bad times and battle through.
Producers though, in my experience, largely do not communicate about issues worrying them – droughts, debts, relationship issues, mental illness etc. These issues and the lack of communication particularly come to the forefront when we are addressing succession planning for family partnerships. My view, until recently, was that such partnerships have limited lives as the next generation takes up the "family farm".
My view though has changed and I was intrigued to read an article in Beef Central some time ago about two Mallee grain growers and their venture into "collaborative farming".
These two farmers started with a blank canvas and designed the ideal farm for their area. They worked with no preconceptions or restrictions and focused only on what mix of land, plant and labour would be required to create the most efficient and profitable farming business for their area.
They have combined their assets and skill base with a corporate focus that has enabled them to achieve a high level of scale, efficiency, profitability and flexibility that simply would not have been possible if they had remained as individual farming units.
Irrespective of what industry or profession you are in, it is an ever competitive and challenging business environment out there, and we all (lawyers included) have to look at ways to drive efficiencies, reduce costs and to ensure the business models are sustainable.
At Thynne + Macartney, for example, many of our lawyers now work remotely, reducing our need for high cost premises and allowing us to consolidate on a smaller floor plate. We also recognise the different strengths of our people and although we are still a legal partnership, we have moved to a corporate management model.
Having been raised in Mitchell on a property consisting of any number of 160 acre blocks carved up after World War 1 for soldier settlements, and in a wool growing era where adjoining properties all had their own woolsheds and supporting infrastructure, I can see opportunities for our farmers and graziers in "collaborative farming".
The basic idea is that you look to others in your or related industries and put yourselves into businesses where you add the most value and be more profitable. A breeder operation, for example, can form a business partnership with the operators of a backgrounding block (and in turn, the operators of a fattening block / feedlot) where resources (whether it be land, manpower, plant, livestock or whatever) can be applied to best advantage to make the combined operation more flexible and profitable than the individual operations could ever hope to be.
As has been said before, "it's not rocket science".
One of the Mallee farmers, John Gladigau, is said to have identified seven core principles for "collaborative farming":
Be strategic – Start off with a blank piece of paper and design your future.
Differentiate between agribusiness and real estate – Most farmers and graziers run two enterprises: a real estate business and an operations business – both have to get a return. Arguably some of our large operators in the beef industry are grappling with this issue.
Use resources efficiently (machinery, labour and infrastructure).
Create cells and replicate them, ie a scalable unit as the most efficient mix of land, machinery, infrastructure etc.
Create an environment of "win-win"– Win-win relationships need to be built between all of the stakeholders throughout the businesses.
Engage specialist services – The days of being a master of all trades (if they ever existed) are well and truly over. Recognise your limitations. There are areas where you need to bring in others because of their different skill set.
An independent voice is needed – Recognise that personalities, especially in a collaborative business where families are brought together, can destroy the business. The one essential element is to have an independent voice. Look at the corporate world where it is common to have an independent chair / directors on the board.
How then do we establish a "collaborative farm"? The key issue here is that "there is no model, there are no rules". You need to create a business that works for you and your partners. Having said that, the basic template is to set up a new company, put the various properties together, lease the properties and plant and sell your livestock to that new entity. There are legitimate steps that can be taken to minimise transactional costs, ie stamp duty, livestock transaction levies and income tax on any such restructure.
In summary, I am convinced more than ever that "the family farm has a future". The crucial issue here though is that the form of the family farm in future may well be more complex. It is of course a complex environment in which we all live and operate.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Bill Loughnan is partner,  Thynne &amp; Macartney and can be contacted <a href="https://www.thymac.com.au/" target="_blank">here</a>.
 
<div> </div>
</body></html>

Collaborative farming – the future for family farms?

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Home buyers should not use a holding deposit when they want to secure a property purchase.
The preferable way to proceed is to exchange purchasing contracts, then use the cooling off period to complete enquiries.   With competition so strong for the nation’s limited housing stocks, purchasers need to better understand the legalities around how they secure their purchase and not leave themselves exposed to gazumping.   Buyers sometimes ask our agents to take a holding deposit, but then take their time to organise building and pest inspections as well as legal enquiries, mistakenly believing they have secured the property.   Paying a holding deposit does not mean the seller is legally obliged to sell you the property, or that you are legally obliged to buy.
Only an exchange of contracts constitutes a legally enforceable agreement. Without an exchange of contracts, buyers place themselves at the mercy of a very competitive buyer marketplace.   Real estate agents often don’t want to be seen to rush buyers into an exchange of contracts due to the relatively small penalty buyers incur if they decide to terminate their purchase during the cooling off period.   A cooling off period is the number of business days where a property buyer can walk away from a legal agreement to purchase a residential property. Buyers who do this usually have to pay the seller a small termination fee, which is often around 0.25% of the purchase price of the property. Any deposit above this will commonly need to be refunded.   But when you’re sure you’ve found the right property and want to complete your due diligence, many would argue it’s better to exchange contracts and secure the property, rather than risk being gazumped, having to continue the search for a property, and incurring yet more costs.   The best advice for buyers is to have finance approved and move quickly to complete enquiries. Sometimes, in the most competitive marketplaces, it’s in a buyer’s best interests to exchange contracts and make those enquiries during the cooling off period. 
Ray Ellis is First National Real Estate's chief executive.
</body></html>

rellis-3VhjqdJSN2

Exchange of contract safer than holding deposits: Ray Ellis

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
I hear many stories where some buyers have been gazumped and others who struggle to obtain the right information from the agent to submit an offer. We even have sellers who don't trust their own real estate agent.
All of these things and many other grey areas do not lead to the best result for the buyers and especially the sellers. The problem lies in buyers and sellers not understanding the legal frameworks the agents are bound within. In this article I want to dispel the myths and the grey areas of common problems that buyers and sellers have with real estate agents.
By the end of this article you should be armed with the right knowledge to help your property transaction go through smoothly as possible.
<ul>
<li>How strict are the authorities?</li>
</ul>
Some people think the real estate agents can get away with murder. This is far from the truth as the perception of the industry is somewhat of a low one. Some surveys reveal that people trust a local sex worker more than their real estate agent. This perception has made us one of the most heavily regulated industries in Australia.
Real estate agents are constantly audited by the ATO, covertly spied on by Fair trading at auctions, taken to CTTT tribunals by tenants/landlords, disciplined by The REI, fined by Australian Securities and Investments Commission about advertising and not to mention being sued!
As you can imagine this is a hazardous industry for a business owner with so many governing bodies keeping it in line. As such, the insurances go through the roof to own and run a real estate agency.
Because of this and Australia's love for property, real estate agents are a target for governing bodies and journalists, as everybody wants to catch a real estate agent doing the wrong thing.
The truth is governing bodies love to make examples of real estate agents as it gets them a lot of publicity, it shows the public that they're doing their job. This leads into my next subject;
<ul>
<li>What are agents constantly apprehensive of?</li>
</ul>
Most agents just want to do their job to the best of their ability without being sued, fined, and or disciplined. This is the underlying tone of the industry but nobody really discusses it.
With every new tightening rule, law and regulation comes more paperwork and administration. We find ourselves using emails, text messages and data basing of diary notes just to cover our rear ends.
This comes as a double edge sword for buyers and sellers as they want everything done cheaper, faster and better. Sometimes this is impossible because buyers, sellers and lawyers like to target real estate agents and inadvertently add to the red tape/cost of running an agency.
This has forced real estate agents to hold the ground on their fees or risk taking shortcuts. I see this many times, for example where agents will show me (not knowing that I'm an agent) a property they have for sale that they do not have a contract of yet. It’s illegal for an agent to advertise a property for which they do not have a contract of sale.
Article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Gazumping
Gazumping refers to when you have a verbal agreement with an agent or seller to purchase a property at an agreed price but the property is not sold to you in the end. Gazumping is a very real problem but it's usually the lack of buyers’ understanding of the law and how contract signing works that gets them in trouble. The buyers in turn blame the agent. This is where our data basing of diary notes and emails comes in handy.
We find especially in a hot market, we have to repeat ourselves at least three times in three different ways for people to put in their best and final offer so they don't feel like we have done the wrong thing by them. Yet people still complain that they would've offered higher. In my observation, it’s easy to say this when things have cooled off and people are just annoyed that they have missed out.
The key to understanding this is not to crack open the champagne until the owner has signed the contract and it is dated. Without a date the contract is invalid. You signing a check with your 10% does not mean you have purchased a property. There are some sales strategies out there in which the agents get three signed contracts and then show the vendors from lowest to highest to get the vendors to agree to a price. The best way to get your contract signed is to make your offer the most attractive you can and this may not just be money but other things such as settlement and rent back options.
To avoid not being called back and missing out on an opportunity to raise your offer, I recommend to stay in constant contact with the agent. You have already indicated your interest, so it doesn't hurt your negotiation by constantly calling them. In fact it can work in your favour if the agent slips up and gives you more information.
Not knowing where you stand when it comes to your offer
My friends and I have invested in a lot of property so I know all too well the feeling of not knowing where you stand when it comes to submitting an offer. My observation of being on both sides of the fence is that it is mainly the lack of trust you have in the agent that is selling to you that creates this feeling.
I found a good way to combat this is to call their bluff on their creating a Dutch option which is illegal. Agents may get offended or annoyed but this is a valid question that I put to them during negotiation and keeps them in line, telling them that it is illegal for them to disclose my offers to other buyers.
Sellers lose money not trusting their agent
When selling you don’t need to like your real estate agent but not to trust them can cost you thousands of dollars. When you sign an agency agreement with certified real estate agent they are in a legal binding contract to work in your best interest to get you the best price for your property.
Agents have a fiduciary requirement to work in your best interest. It is illegal for them to work against you. This is in the back of the mind of every selling agent. They are in the middle doing their best to maintain their relationship with the buyer but also trying to achieve the highest possible price the your property.
Agents have their agency agreements audited all the time to see if there is any discrepancies that show collusion with buyers, nondisclosure, secret commissions, or getting the value of your property wrong. They can be caught out very easily.
This is why you don’t need to like your agent to trust them because they have no choice but to work in your best interest.
I will give you an example that I see happens every week in real estate that cost sellers at least $10-$20,000 on a selling price.
The seller normally thinks that their property is the best in the world and that’s fair enough if you have grown up in the area and have created memories in your home. However, this emotional attachment makes sellers think that we under-price the value of their home and that people would actually be prepared to pay more than the market price.
This is entirely not true and I see seller’s market high prices for their home, killing enquiry levels and interest in the most important first week of advertising. You will always get a peak of interest in the first week.
In fact more enquiry drives the price up and what usually drives enquiry is a low advertised price.
Note: The advertised price is not your asking price it is just advertising (backed up by comparable sales of course). Your selling price is completely different.
Many sellers do not trust agents when they explain this and that is understandable with all the emotions around property and money. But you really need to see it from a buyer’s perspective before you look at it from a seller’s perspective.
This concept can help you achieve above market price for your property, as agents are in the market every day. Remember the sale is not based on the advertised price but what others are prepared to pay when competing against one another, this is normally call a “market price”.
Summary
I challenge you to look up the rules, laws and regulations agents have to work within. This will help you have more confidence in your property transaction and dealing with agents.
Here are some resources I suggest;
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.fairtrading.nsw.gov.au/ftw/Property_agents_and_managers/Rules_of_conduct/Real_estate_agents.page" style="line-height: 1.3em;">fairtrading.nsw.gov.au</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/consumer-protection/real-estate-agents-and-sales-representatives" style="line-height: 1.3em;">commerce.wa.gov.au</a></li>
<li><a href="https://www.reinsw.com.au/iMIS15_prod/web/actsandregulations" style="line-height: 1.3em;">reinsw.com.au</a></li>
</ul>
Jhai Mitchell is the internet marketing real estate agent for <a href="https://www.elderstoongabbie.com.au/" target="_blank">Elders Toongabbie</a> and <a href="https://www.elderskingslangley.com.au/" target="_blank">Kings Langle</a> and maintains a blog, <a href="https://realestatesevenhillsnews.com.au/" target="_blank">Seven Hills Real Estate News</a>.
</body></html>

JhaiMitchell-KTraswnPwa

How the sales process works: What laws do real estate agents have to abide by?

<html><body>
The High Court of Australia has sided with the Commissioner of State Revenue in a stamp duty disagreement over Docklands developments.
In the decision, made last month, the High Court ruled that the Commissioner was entitled to reference the entire value of a development agreement, rather than just the sales contract value, when assessing stamp duty payable.
Developer Lend Lease made an agreement with VicUrban in 2001 to purchase Docklands land parcels, with Lend Lease to develop and sell large residential and commercial properties on the land. Both Lend Lease and VicUrban agreed to contribute infrastructure, including a bridge, a park and a road extension, on and around the land.
Under the development agreement, Lend Lease was required to pay additional amounts to VicUrban beyond what was outlined in the sales contract. The additional payments included compensation for infrastructure and remediation, as well as a portion of proceeds received by Lend Lease when they sold properties on the land.
Lend Lease objected to the Commissioners assessment of the stamp duty payable, which referenced the entire quantity paid by Lend Lease as part of the development agreement. The developer argued that the consideration paid for each parcel of land only included the amount specified in the sales contract.
However, the High Court disagreed. In the decision, reference was made to a dispute in 2005 between Dick Smith Electronics and the Commissioner. In that case, the majority held that the total consideration included the buyer's execution of several promises outlined in an agreement which contributed to the overall sum, as the vendor would not have transferred the asset (in that instance, a bundle of shares) if the buyer hadn't taken those actions.
After the Commissioner disallowed Lend Lease's initial objections to his assessment, Lend Lease launched an appeals process which saw the High Court ultimately agree with the Commissioner's assessment. Lend Lease has stated that it respects the High Court's decision.
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

High Court rules stamp duty consideration extends beyond sales contract value

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Brisbane tenants and unit owners need to brush up on body corporate rules in the wake of recent storms to avoid being stung with insurance nightmares.
With experts predicting an increase in severe storms this summer, I’m urging all Brisbane unit owners to prepare now. Residents in units and apartments in particular have unique considerations to bear in mind around storm preparedness and insurance claims.
Residents need to think about how the storm’s effect on the body corporate will impact their property, and vice versa for how their actions can affect the body corporate. For example, the placement of a drain in a common area could potentially be a flood hazard to ground floor properties if there is an excessive amount of rain.
Owners should be aware of this type of issue and have an action plan in place to mitigate potential flood damage which could include having a barrier ready to roll out and a plan to move any valuables.
On the flip side, unit owners and tenants need to prepare their property not only to ensure their own safety but also the safety of the building as a whole.
This includes securing balcony furniture and ensuring the property complies with the building’s by-laws. If a unit does not comply it can create unnecessary dangers for the property and the building as a whole.
Navigating the insurance process can be tricky for those in units and apartments. It depends on your scheme’s insurance but most policies will cover the structure of the building including internal fixed cupboards, but will normally exclude cover for carpets and of course your personal belongings.
Some policies may also exclude flood cover unless the body corporate chooses to include it, so be sure to check the policy document of your scheme’s insurance to know what’s covered and what’s not.
Here are some tips for you to consider:
<ul>
<li>Prepare your property – secure items on your balcony and ensure your unit complies with the building’s by-laws. If you’re unsure, contact your body corporate. 
</li>
<li>Prepare common areas – clear away any rubbish and ensure all loose items are secured. This includes outdoor furniture, pot plants and plastic pool furniture which can be placed in the pool to avoid it blowing away. 
</li>
<li>Check your insurance policy – be aware that the building’s strata insurance does not cover your belongings in your unit so you will need to have up-to-date contents insurance. 
</li>
<li>Familiarise yourself with your building’s evacuation plan just in case you need to evacuate and ensure you consider pets if necessary. </li>
<li>Communicate with your body corporate about your property’s damage and any damage you notice on common property as soon as possible.</li>
</ul>
Grant Mifsud has more than 12 years’ experience in the strata industry and has been a senior body corporate manager at<a href="https://www.abcm.com.au" target="_blank"> Archers Body Corporate Management</a> since 2007. 
Currently Grant manages a portfolio of clients in the Brisbane region with a focus on providing financial and strata legislation advice. Grant is a practitioner member of Strata Community Australia (SCA).
</body></html>

GrantMifsud-hZGcbKY2ir

Recent storms show why it pays to brush up on body corporate laws

<html><body>
Building a secondary dwelling, either on a principal place of residence or out the back of a rental property, for tenants to live in has long been an accepted way of increasing rental yield on applicable homes.
With double the income from one block, the $80,000 to $120,000 outlay to build a granny flat has been undertaken in many areas, in particularly Western Sydney.
However, the Tenants’ Union of Tasmania’s solicitor, Peter Foster, is warning Tasmanian tenants about some of the difficulties.
The main issue remains around the subject of electricity or power connection. Even if the landlords live in the main house, or it is holding tenants itself, it’s advised to have separate meters.
Not only will this make life easier in terms of bills, however not keeping this separate may actually be unlawful under the Act, explains Foster in the latest TUTas advisory email.
“Some owners will insert clauses into leases that seem like a fair compromise. For example, that each household pays half of the power bill. But is going halves just when only two tenants live in the flat while the owner, her husband and three children reside in the adjacent house? It would be reasonable to assume the owner and her family will be consuming more electricity,” writes Foster.
He suggests that there may also be some arrangements where there’s a “per head pay share” where each tenant pays for a divided portion of the bill per person. However, lifestyle imbalances can affect the bills and still have some paying more than they should.
When assessing ‘fairness’, clearly there are many difficulties. The Act is even clearer. Foster explains that the landlord is only able to charge for rent, damage and usage costs of a water bill under the agreement, but that all other charges cannot be collected by the landlord or agent. This would include electricity bills.
The solution may be to have a meter installed at the granny flat. While ne notes that owners have no legal obligation to install the meter it certainly seems the most recommended option.
How have you tackled this issue with your tenants?
</body></html>

Legal

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Legal

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News