Queensland builder-developer MAYD has revealed the first look at its major North Kirra beachfront development, lodging amended plans that reduce the number of apartments and increase the proportion of larger residences.

The project is planned across a substantial 4,742 sqm amalgamated site spanning seven lots at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/2-6-pacific-parade-bilinga-qld-4225">2-6 Pacific Parade</a> and 27-33 Golden Four Drive in Bilin​ga, directly opposite Nor​th Kirra Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/mayd-group">MAYD</a> secured the site for $32.5 million in 2025, in what was one of the Gold Coast's largest property transactions of the year.

The development will be delivered across two stages, with the first stage carrying an estimated gross realisation value of around $360 million.

The latest amendments seek to reduce the overall apartment count and shift the project further toward the owner-occupier market, with larger residences designed for buyers wanting considerably more space than traditionally offered in a beachfront apartment.

The residential mix will include townhomes, oversized two-bedroom apartments, substantial three-bedroom residences and four-bedroom homes.

MAYD has appointed Cera Stribley to lead the architecture and interiors, with the Melbourne-based design practice drawing on the beachfront setting through a series of ocean-facing terraces and heavily landscaped balconies.

Strong horizontal forms and curved balconies will define the exterior, with subtropical landscaping integrated throughout the building to soften the built form and increase the connection between the residences and the beachfront.

The project will also include an extensive collection of resident wellness and lifestyle facilities, continuing the broader shift across the Gold Coast's luxury apartment market toward larger homes supported by resort-style amenity.

<img alt="MAYD" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1bcbb05-e659-4b47-8bd4-1e595315e2ad" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%202.05.03%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=jj0XEud1X1DuLt7_KyElhjMdZGOXmLHP" />

MAYD Founder Todd Mould said North Kirra was increasingly appealing to buyers attracted to the more established, lower-density character of the southern Gold Coast.

"North Kirra presents one of the most compelling luxury residential opportunities currently emerging in Australia, combining absolute beachfront with the character and authenticity that buyers are increasingly seeking, and the same sense of tight-knit community that defined Burleigh and Currumbin perhaps 10 or 15 years ago," Mould said.

"With Gold Coast Airport on its doorstep, it also offers a level of accessibility that broadens its appeal across almost every market demographic."

The project comes as the southern Gold Coast continues to attract an increasing share of high-end apartment development and buyer activity.

Kirra in particular has emerged as one of the region's more tightly held beachfront markets, with its relatively low-density character, established surf and hospitality scene and proximity to Gold Coast Airport differentiating it from the higher-density markets further north.

Mould said those characteristics had informed the approach MAYD and Cera Stribley had taken to the project.

"We've worked closely with Cera Stribley to create a vision that is deeply connected to its surroundings," he said.

"Inspired by the coastline itself, the architecture has been shaped around space, privacy and resort-style living, creating a collection of homes that reflects the next generation of luxury on the southern Gold Coast."

MOTIV Managing Director Carly Cottam, who has been appointed to market the project, said buyer attention had continued to move south along the Gold Coast.

"Purchasers who may once have defaulted to Broadbeach, Main Beach or Surfers Paradise are increasingly recognising the value of a genuine beachfront location that offers lower density, strong amenity and a more established sense of community," Cottam said.

"Kirra has a powerful combination of growing demand and genuine scarcity. Beachfront supply is inherently constrained, the area remains relatively low density, and buyers are increasingly placing a premium on locations that feel established, uncrowded and authentic rather than heavily developed."

Cottam said the proximity to Gold Coast Airport was also proving increasingly important for interstate and second-home buyers.

"Being minutes from Gold Coast Airport makes it particularly compelling for interstate buyers, frequent travellers and second-home purchasers who can access an authentic coastal lifestyle almost immediately after stepping off a flight."

The acquisition takes MAYD's active development portfolio to more than $500 million, with the North Kirra project representing one of its largest undertakings to date.

MAYD is targeting an early 2027 launch.

Joel Robinson

First look at MAYD's North Kirra mixed-use precinct

<main data-perf-region="main">
Castle Hill, the longtime hub of the Hills District, has been one of the major beneficiaries of Sydney's Metro expansion, with improved connectivity helping drive continued population growth, development and buyer demand across the Hills District.

But despite that growth, the suburb has seen relatively few major new apartment projects brought to market over the past 18 months.

Hills District developer Reve Group is looking to fill that gap with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nova-r-ve-castle-hill-2-garthowen-crescent-castle-hill-nsw-2154">Nova Rêve</a>, a major new mixed-use precinct on the corner of Garthowen Crescent and Old Castle Hill Road, a short walk from Castle Hill Metro Station and Castle Towers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377679]

The project will comprise three residential towers alongside a hotel, restaurants, cafes and a skybar, more than 1,600 sqm of ground-floor retail and almost an acre of landscaped gardens.

It represents the largest project undertaken by Reve Group, the development arm of the Kassis family, which has been building across the Hills District for more than 30 years through Kassis Homes.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377675]

Nova Rêve also represents a significant step up from the family's first apartment development, Grand Rêve, which was delivered nearby on Garthowen Crescent.

Grand Rêve introduced larger, house-like apartment layouts and premium inclusions including Wolf and Sub-Zero appliances to the Castle Hill market.

Nova Rêve takes that approach to a precinct scale, combining the residential component with hospitality, retail and substantial public and resident landscaping.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377685]

Reve Group Managing Director Sam Kassis said the project reflected the family's three decades of building in the Hills, which has evolved from trophy homes on quarter-acre blocks to larger-scale apartment development.

"Grand Rêve was our first apartment project here and it showed us what this pocket of Castle Hill could be. Nova Rêve is the refinement of that idea: not just apartments, but a place the whole suburb can use," Kassis said.

A key part of that approach is the hotel, which has been designed to operate as an amenity for the wider Castle Hill community rather than solely hotel guests.

It will include restaurants, cafes, skybars and all-day dining, alongside conference and event facilities catering to business functions, community groups and private events.

At ground level, more than 1,600 sqm of shops and cafes will open onto the surrounding streets and landscaped areas.

Almost an acre of gardens designed by Land and Form Studios will run through the precinct, incorporating pathways, seating, barbecue areas and children's play spaces.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=152737 project_image_fid=377680]

Reve Group's Romio Georges said creating an active ground plane had been central to the planning of Nova Rêve.

"There are gardens with pathways, barbecues, seating and play areas, shops and cafes opening onto the street, and a hotel with restaurants and a skybar that anyone in Castle Hill can walk into," Georges said.

The project's elevated position on one of Sydney's highest ridgelines will also provide apartments with outlooks toward the Sydney skyline, surrounding parkland and the Blue Mountains.

More than 80 per cent of the apartments will occupy corner positions, with Turner responsible for both the architecture and interiors.

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=152737]

<h3 data-end="3697" data-section-id="q3n5ak" data-start="3672">&nbsp;</h3>
</main>

Nova Rêve arrives as Reve Group bets on Castle Hill's next growth phase

A collection of just 25 large-format apartments and penthouses overlooking Goodwin Park is entering the Coolangatta market, with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/marea-residences-coolangatta-27-27a-dixon-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Maréa Residences</a> combining a low-density, residential-only approach with uninterrupted park and Pacific Ocean outlooks.

Located at 27 Dixon Street, Maréa comprises three and four-bedroom residences alongside a limited number of dual-level penthouses, with the project positioned between Goodwin Park and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/coolangatta-qld-4225">Coolangatta</a>’s coastal precinct.

Construction has commenced, with completion currently estimated for late 2027. Three-bedroom residences are priced from $1.8 million.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374005]

The project has been designed around its northern outlook across the park, with the building’s architecture, landscaping and material palette intended to establish a connection with the neighbouring green space. The residences have been configured to maximise natural light and views across Goodwin Park towards the ocean.

Inside, the material palette incorporates timber, stone and brushed brass, complemented by curved detailing and ambient lighting. Kitchens and bathrooms carry the same natural material approach, while residences also include basement parking, storage and lift access.

Maréa’s penthouses are arranged over two levels and include private pools, adding another layer to the project’s focus on larger-format apartment living. Across the development, residences are configured with three or four bedrooms rather than the broader mix of smaller apartment types commonly found in larger projects.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374010]

Resident amenity is concentrated at rooftop level, where landscaped entertaining terraces and pools take advantage of elevated views across Coolangatta and the Pacific Ocean.

The project has so far been particularly well received by local owner-occupiers and downsizers, according to Urban Activation Property Sales and Marketing Director Matt George, with the residential-only format, construction quality and northern park outlook among the features resonating with purchasers.

“The uninterrupted northern aspect overlooking Goodwin Park has been a key point of difference, with buyers attracted to the sense of serenity and open space the park provides, while still enjoying easy access to the ocean and being within walking distance of the lifestyle and amenities Coolangatta has to offer,” George said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150999 project_image_fid=374002]

“The combination of high-quality construction, a residential-only building, park outlook and proximity to the beach has resonated strongly with the local downsizer market.”

The Dixon Street address is within walking distance of Coolangatta Beach and the broader southern Gold Coast coastline, including the surf breaks at Snapper Rocks and Kirra. Coolangatta’s cafés, restaurants and retail are nearby, while Gold Coast Airport is also within close proximity.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150999]

Maréa Residences brings parkside apartments to Coolangatta

Melbourne developer PDG has secured Victorian Government approval for its $1.5 billion Southbank development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-one-1-queens-bridge-street-southbank-vic-3006">The One</a>, clearing the way for the long-dormant riverfront site opposite Crown to finally be developed.

The Minister for Planning has approved the project at 1-29 Queens Bridge Street, with the Department of Transport and Planning issuing the planning permit following its assessment.

The approval will allow PDG to develop the prominent 5,059 sqm site with a major mixed-use tower comprising premium apartments, including branded residences, a luxury hotel and boutique office space.

PDG acquired the site in late 2024, with its position directly opposite Crown's main entrance and near Melbourne's Arts Precinct making it one of Southbank's most significant remaining development opportunities.

<img alt="PDG" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3933013e-6332-4386-b9be-089df05caf17" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%209.29.22%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=sITIgBqDL0N3VNSMwWEmF5UA.uvcsRyu" />

Designed by COX in collaboration with ODO and PDG, the tower's architecture draws on the movement of the Yarra River, with six vertical pleats running the height of the sculpted facade.

The project will also see the heritage-listed Queens Bridge Hotel restored and incorporated into the development&nbsp;with new hospitality and public uses, including a rooftop venue.

A significant component of The One will be its residential amenity.

More than 5,000 sqm of resident facilities will be delivered across a single level, making it one of the largest consolidated residential amenity offerings proposed in an Australian apartment development.

The planning approval also incorporates a major upgrade of Queensbridge Square, which PDG will deliver in partnership with the City of Melbourne.

<img alt="PDG" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="73167fcd-1031-4b6f-a408-a064cfe45ed1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-27%20at%209.29.17%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=Pf1AEWxw6SNmBqR0zQW5lyEze.MtxgFp" />

The existing square will be revitalised as a new civic and pedestrian space along the Yarra River, strengthening the connection between the project, Southbank and the riverfront.

PDG Founder and Managing Director Vince Giuliano said the approval represented a major milestone for a site which has remained largely underutilised for more than 15 years.

“This is the most significant Planning Permit approval Melbourne has seen in recent years,” Giuliano said.

“For more than 15 years, this site has remained underutilised. This approval enables us to deliver a project that will contribute meaningfully to the revitalisation of Southbank, restore and reactivate an important heritage building, and create a new civic and hospitality destination for Melbourne.”

The latest approval follows an earlier planning permit issued by the City of Melbourne covering demolition works across part of the site at 9-29 Queens Bridge Street. Those demolition and early works are already underway.

PDG has also started generating early interest in the residential component from owner-occupiers ahead of a planned public launch in early 2027.

PDG secures approval for $1.5bn Southbank apartment development, The One

Local developer Harridan is seeking to turn its Woolloongabba apartment project into the first stage of a broader transformation of Burke Street, using a new 16-storey mixed-use building to establish a greener pedestrian connection toward the rapidly evolving Boggo Road transport and knowledge precinct.

The South East Queensland developer has filed plans for 154 apartments on the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/4-burke-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">southern side of Burke Street</a>, where its proposal has been designed alongside a wider vision by LatStudios for the street.

That vision positions the southern side of Burke Street for buildings of 15 storeys and above, while envisaging lower-rise development of up to five storeys on the northern side to transition into Woolloongabba's existing character housing. It also proposes wider pedestrian verges, deep planting, new street trees and upgrades to the pedestrian approach to Boggo Road Station.

The Harridan development itself has been designed by Brisbane-based Arqus Design and will comprise 154 apartments across 16 storeys. The mix is weighted heavily toward two-bedroom apartments, with 121 proposed alongside 10 one-bedroom and 23 three-bedroom residences. There will typically be around 14 units per floor.

A lower-ground car park and three podium levels will accommodate 156 resident parking spaces, along with visitor and commercial parking. There will also be 154 resident bicycle spaces and 40 visitor bicycle parks.

&nbsp;

Harridan is a family-owned developer and part of the Holmwood Highgate Group, with more than three decades of development activity across South East Queensland. Its portfolio spans residential, commercial and industrial property, with current residential projects including Riverbank on Byron in Bulimba, Esperance Residences in Carina and The Precinct at Kinross Road in Thornlands.

Wooloongabba has been popular for apartment developers, particularly since the announcement of the 2032 Summer Olympics games in Brisbane.

While there have been a lot of development applications, it has failed to materialize into real supply.&nbsp;

Sarazin has been the major player in the area. They are under construction at Murcia Residences, on the fringe of East Brisbane and Woolloongabba. They have just launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-stanley-residences-woolloongabba-8-trafalgar-street-woolloongabba-qld-4102">The Stanley Residences</a>, in Woolloongabba on Trafalagar Street. They also have Nuage coming soon on the nearby <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/nuage-woolloongabba-14-wellington-road-woolloongabba-qld-4102">Wellington Road</a>.

First look: Harridan plans Burke Street transformation beside Boggo Road transport hub

Demographics

<html><body>
The Australian Bureau of Statistics has recently released demographic data at a capital city level to June 2013. 
We have <a href="/expert-insights/investing/abs-stats-reveal-population-growth-is-escalating-in-nsw-and-victoria">previously covered the population data</a> however, when the data is paired with dwelling approvals data over the same period there are some very interesting findings.
Over the 12 months to June 2013, the population of the combined capital cities increased by a total of 313,387 persons.  At the same time, there were 114,825 capital city dwelling approvals over the period.  Based purely on the ratio of population growth to dwelling approvals, there was one dwelling approved for construction for every 2.73 residents added to the capital cities.
At a national level, the 2011 Census reported that average people per household at that time was 2.6 persons.  Based on that figure you can see that population growth has exceeded dwelling approvals over the past year.  Of course measuring demand for housing is not quite so simple.  Although it is a bit old now, the former Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank (RBA) gave a speech entitled ‘Housing and the Economy’ to the National Housing Conference in November 2009, which is available <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/publications/bulletin/2009/dec/pdf/bu-1209-5.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.  In the speech he posed the question, ‘Are we building enough dwellings?’  Two of the most interesting revelations from the speech were:
<ol>
<li>A higher proportion of the new dwellings built are simply replacing existing homes that have been demolished.  The RBA estimated that between 2001 and 2006, around 15% of new dwellings built replaced those that had been demolished; 10-15 years earlier that figure was less than 10%. 
</li>
<li>A significant proportion of dwelling investment appears to have gone into holiday homes or second homes.  Census data (2006 Census) shows that the number of dwellings built has exceeded the increase in the number of households by a large margin.  As a result, the ratio of the number of dwellings to the number of households has been rising over time; as at 2006, there were 8% more dwellings in Australia than there were households.  Presumably, most of this surplus reflects holiday houses and second houses.</li>
</ol>
So at a national level, the former Deputy Governor’s speech suggested that in order to cater to dwelling replacements and secondary homes we need to construct 23% more dwellings than the previous simplistic analysis of measuring the rate of population growth compared to approvals.  Also keep in mind here that we are looking at approvals, they won’t necessarily all go on to become commencements and ultimately completions.
An assumption we could make here is that, holiday and second homes are generally more likely to be situated outside rather than inside a capital city.  As a result, the second revelation detailed above is probably not going to have as much of an impact at a capital city level.  Nevertheless we still have to allow for the 15% of homes which have been demolished when looking at the approvals data.
<blockquote>
Maybe it is time to look at ways that we can incentivise developers to bring vacant land to the market quicker rather than banking land and drip-feeding it to the market.
</blockquote>
Across individual capital cities, the 2011 Census reported that on average; Sydney, Brisbane and Darwin had 2.7 persons per household, Melbourne, Perth and the Australian Capital Territory had 2.6 persons per household and Adelaide and Hobart had 2.4 persons per household. 
Returning to the original findings, over the year to June 2013, the capital city population increased by 313,387 persons and 114,825 dwellings were approved for construction.  If we adjust for average household sizes as per the 2011 Census, to match population growth there would have ideally been a slightly higher 119,135 approvals over the year.  If we then further adjust for the assumption that we should approve 15% more homes to replace demolitions, there should have been 137,005 dwellings approved for construction last year, a shortfall of 22,180 capital city approvals.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3122" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-11.jpg" alt="Chart 1" width="500" height="181">
As the above chart shows, the supply of new dwelling approvals was generally quite sufficient through the 1990s however, throughout the 2000’s new dwelling approvals have been insufficient in relation to the level of population growth.  We are now seeing rising dwelling approvals on the back of escalating housing demand and rising home values which is encouraging however, it will have to continue for many years to make up for the insufficient supply response over the past decade or so. 
In Sydney and Melbourne, there was one home approved for every 2.72 and 2.48 new residents respectively indicating a level of supply closer to equilibrium with demand over the most recent year.  New supply remains very much insufficient in Brisbane and Perth where one new home was approved for every 3.26 new residents in Brisbane and 3.45 new residents in Perth.
The following charts track the annual population growth and the annual number of dwelling approvals across each capital city.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3114" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Syd-chart.jpg" alt="Syd chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3115" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Mel-chart.jpg" alt="Mel chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3116" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Bne-chart.jpg" alt="Bne chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3117" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Adl-chart.jpg" alt="Adl chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3118" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Per-chart.jpg" alt="Per chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3119" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Hob-chart.jpg" alt="Hob chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3120" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Dar-chart.jpg" alt="Dar chart" width="500" height="179">
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3121" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Can-chart.jpg" alt="Can chart" width="500" height="179">
As the above charts show, the disconnect between the level of population growth and dwelling approvals over the past decade have been greatest within our largest capital cities.  It is no coincidence that these cities are also the regions that have been recording the greatest increase in population over this period.
A further important consideration when looking at the relationship between population growth and dwelling approvals is the type of product that is being developed for the market.  While the city-wide analysis is valuable new housing typically comes in the form of new houses on the outskirts of the city or medium to high density product within the inner city areas. Over time, we are seeing a shift away from greenfield housing development in most capital cities towards infill higher density development.
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3123" src="https://blog.rpdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Chart-21.jpg" alt="Chart 2" width="500" height="182">
Over the year to June 1991, 29.9% of all new dwelling approvals across the combined capital cities were for units as opposed to houses.  In June 2013, 49.7% of all dwelling approvals over the year were for units.  Over the year, there were more units than houses approved for construction in Sydney (66.1%), Melbourne (52.7%), Brisbane (50.1%), Darwin (64.5%) and Canberra (54.9%).  The unit category type includes townhouses and semi-detached homes as well as units. 
The 2011 Census reported that across the separate house category, the most prevalent number of bedrooms is three bedrooms (49.6%) and four bedrooms (32.4%).  When you combine the results for semi-detached and units the most prevalent number of bedrooms is two bedrooms (50.1%) and three bedrooms (28.6%). 
To look at it another way, 88.8% of detached houses have three bedrooms or more compared to 66.9% of units having two bedrooms or fewer.  The point here is that if you are going to deliver more units to the market, they typically have fewer bedrooms and therefore are likely to have a smaller average household size than a detached house would.  As a result, it is likely that as the delivery of units increases there actually needs to be a greater number of units constructed in order to cater for population growth than there would have been if houses were exclusively built.
It is clear for the analysis that particularly within the four largest capital cities there has been a growing deficiency of dwellings approved for construction over recent years when compared to population growth.  Over the past 12 to 18 months there has been a noticeable rise in dwelling approvals however they will have to continue to rise over coming years to make up for the deficiency over recent years.  Particularly in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane we are seeing a push to greater density in the inner city areas. 
So how do we fix the supply side problems? 
There are many solutions but I think in the main we need to approve new developments faster, increase developable land both in the inner city and within greenfield areas and reduce the costs of new development to the developer because these costs are ultimately passed on to consumers.  Remember that developers are commercial entities looking to make the best possible returns for shareholders. 
Maybe it is time to look at ways that we can incentivise developers to bring vacant land to the market quicker rather than banking land and drip-feeding it to the market.  Whether that be an additional tax on undeveloped land or some sort of financial incentive to bring stock to the market, I am not sure, but it is clear that particularly within the major capital cities the current conditions are not working and finding a way to increase the supply of new dwellings is imperative.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

Our capital city population is booming but housing supply failing to keep up

<html><body>
Living in compact housing is becoming more popular across Australia due to our changing demographic makeup and lifestyle expectations.
Demography
Every second household in Australia currently supports either one or two people.  Let me repeat, 51% of households, according to the 2011 Census, held just one or two people.
It is forecast that this proportion of one and two person households will rise.  Some estimates are that two-thirds of Australia’s homes will support singles or couples within a generation.
We are not just talking about the Gen Y rental markets here, but owner-resident households too.  This trend is even more pronounced for aging baby boomers and their first generation parents.
Lifestyle
Our time-short lifestyle is making the increased commuter time from ‘home’ to ‘work’ to ‘play’ (whether by car or public transport) less acceptable.
The increasing cost of long private commutes (petrol, car maintenance and insurance etc.) and the need for several cars is making the idea of a ‘go-card’ and public commutes/walking/cycling more appealing.
<blockquote>
The most important consideration in any new investment property purchase is who is likely to be the next owner after you.
</blockquote>
The lag in infrastructure provision to outlying new suburbs is adding additional strain on a public which increasingly wants more now.  Waiting for things (like neighbourhood services and amenity) is no longer part of our creed.
We, as a nation, by and large, seem happy to trade ‘space’ for ‘place’.
Creating place
I often repeat this simple phrase – “density needs to be offset”.
If we are going to live in a more compact dwelling space, then that space itself, and what surrounds it, needs to better than if our home and private yard was much more voluminous.
I am not staying that detached homes are potential dumps or that living on acreage is akin to being in a pigsty*, it’s just that the room for error is far greater in tight confines.
If I have learnt anything from watching those property shows on Foxtel, it is that space is often working against you when it comes to small builds.
Better buying
Compact housing design, like for apartments, must be clever in its use of space; finishes; building amenities and services.
One of the keys to better housing investment is to match the aspirations of the resident now and into the future.  The most important consideration in any new investment property purchase is who is likely to be the next owner after you.  It’s the next buyer who determines your capital growth potential and in most cases it is best if that next buyer is an owner-resident.
So what are some rules to buying a better compact dwelling?
<ol>
<li>
Space  Now this may sound like an oxymoron, but one should always buy as much space as one can afford.  There are basic human dimensions that can only be compromised so far.  For example, living areas must allow for residents and guests to easily move around.  One needs to be able to walk around a queen sized bed.   You do need to do the three S’s (shower, shave and s… well you get the picture) in a bathroom.  Kitchens aren’t just places for Clooney coffee machines, they need workable bench space, multiple storage options; good lighting and a full suite of appliances. 
</li>
<li>
Natural light and ventilation  Think energy efficiency.  The best way to do that is via natural light and ventilation.  All glass should be full floor to ceiling, designed to ensure privacy. 
</li>
<li>
Ceiling height  Space should not only be judged on floor area, but also by ceiling height.  It’s the perception of space that is important, not just the overall metereage. Buy apartments with a minimum ceiling height of 2.6 metres, over 2.7 metres is better still.  
</li>
<li>
Lighting and ceiling type  Down lights recessed into a plasterboard ceiling.   The plasterboard ceiling creates an air gap between the concrete slab structure and room itself.  This creates an important acoustic barrier that lessens noise from the apartment above.    Make sure there is enough lighting in the kitchen; bathrooms and laundry area. 
</li>
<li>
Hard floor finish  Carpet is out and tiles or timber is in when it comes to living areas.  Carpet in bedrooms is still strongly favored. 
</li>
<li>
Great kitchens  The kitchen is usually the ‘centerpiece’ of one’s home.  But when it comes to compact living, the kitchen’s status has lifted to ‘showpiece’. Let’s get a bit specific here, kitchens should incorporate:  Stone bench tops and high quality splash backs;  Designer cupboards and drawers – in fact the more drawers the better;  High quality appliance package with cooktop, oven, range hood, dishwasher, convection microwave and refrigerator – yes a microwave and fridge;  Good task lighting is vital  
</li>
<li>
Functional bathrooms  When it comes to local moves, one of the most cited reasons why is that the bathrooms weren’t practical.  Bathrooms need to have:  Sizable showers with detachable shower rose;  Mandatory WC;  Vanity with sufficient storage and shelves; Floor to ceiling tiled walls;  Natural light and direct ventilation if possible – i.e. operable windows;  Several towel rails;  Include stand-alone bath if space permits  
</li>
<li>
Separate laundry  A dedicated laundry area that is well ventilated and capable of linen and appliance storage - in fact the more storage the better.  
</li>
<li>
Storage Think about those designer closet advertisements you see in the weekend papers or on TV.  Storage is king when it comes to compact living.  The better the storage space the better your tenant and owner-resident resale appeal.  And this is the one area that most developers – like nearly all of them – don’t do well.  Sadly, most aren’t even interested in addressing this issue.  
</li>
<li>
MPR  One bedroom apartments – for example - can sometimes be a room short.  A small multiple purpose room or study has a variety of uses for a one or two person household.  It should be large enough to have a single bed, study desk and some robe space. 
</li>
<li>
Good sized balconies  A well-proportioned balcony not only allows for outside private entertaining, but allows the ‘outside in’.  The balcony should be able to accommodate a six seat table setting and room for a small BBQ.  A glass up stand is much better than a solid balustrade. 
</li>
<li>
Aspect and view  The most preferred aspect is north, but there are occasions where south, east and west can have a more appealing outlook and view.  An inviting view is a strong lifestyle and resale benefit. 
</li>
<li>
ASC  All living areas and all bedrooms these days should have individual air-conditioning.  Key card or intercom security to building and apartment floor is also mandatory.  Any new compact home should be capable of access to the NBN or broadband wireless. 
</li>
<li>
Car parking  One car per apartment is the minimum required to have future owner-resident appeal.  When it comes to the provision of visitor car spaces, one per four apartments is ideal. 
</li>
<li>
Lifts  Lifts and their operation are vital when it comes to apartment living.  A good lift service with access to basement carpark is one lift per 50 apartments. 
</li>
<li>
Recreational facilities  Residents and guests always appreciate a common area incorporating a swimming pool and deck.  Other meeting areas are also highly regarded.  A great foyer works wonders but gyms are better done offsite these days. These rules apply always.  But become vital when looking at buying in a crowded market.  Our property pick <a href="https://matusik.com.au/files/2013/03/Matusik-Property-Picks-March-2014.pdf" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">rules</a> also apply.
</li>
</ol>
Good investing.
*I live on acreage in Brisbane’s west and let me tell you space allows one to hide a multitude of property sins.
Our thanks go to John Egan, <a href="https://www.eganprop.com.au/" target="_blank">Egan Property Solutions</a>, for his collaborative contribution to this article.
Visit Michael's <a href="https://www.matusik.com.au/" target="_blank">website</a>, read <a href="https://www.matusikmissive.com.au/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">his blog</a>, follow him on <a href="https://www.facebook.com/ThinkMatusik?fref=ts" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://www.twitter.com/michaelmatusik" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a>, or connect via <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaelmatusik" rel="nofollow">LinkedIn</a>.
</body></html>

michaelmatusik-49YzLvdmNv

The rules for buying better compact housing investments 

<html><body>
Recently released data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) shows that as at June 2013, the rate of population growth in Australia’s capital cities was significantly greater than that of regional markets.
Perth topped the charts as the city to consistently record the fastest rate of population growth with 395,000 new persons moving to Perth between 2006 and 2013. However in raw number terms, the increase in population has been much greater in Melbourne and in Sydney.
Between 1991 and 2013 Sydney added an additional 1,084,169 residents, Melbourne 1,153,248, Brisbane 826,621, Adelaide 198,141 and Perth 746,243.
As at June 2013, ABS reported that almost two out of every five Australian’s (39.4%) lived in either Sydney or Melbourne, however, the proportion of Australian’s living in Sydney or Melbourne fell slightly from 1991 (39.7%). This is largely due to a rising prominence of Brisbane and Perth as population centres.
In 1991, 21.3% of Australian’s lived in Sydney, 18.5% in Melbourne, 8.2% in Brisbane and 7.1% in Perth. By 2013, 20.6% of Australian’s lived in Sydney, 18.8% in Melbourne, 9.7% in Brisbane and 8.5% in Perth. Despite the declining prominence of Sydney, the proportion of Australian’s living within our four largest cities has increased from 55.0% in 1991 to 57.6% currently.
<img src="/images/2014/04/10/kusher-april-10-foru.gif" alt="">
The rising prominence of Brisbane and Perth as population centres has really emerged over recent years. Obviously the resources sector boom has driven this to some extent with escalating demand for professionals working and associated with this sector.
Darwin was the only other capital city to record an increase in its overall proportion of the national population over the period, shifting from 0.5% in 1991 to 0.6% in 2013.
Adelaide recorded the largest decline in its proportion of population over the period across the capital cities, falling from 6.3% of the national population in 1991 to 5.6% in 2013.
Sydney and Melbourne continued to be the most significant population centres however; Melbourne is catching Sydney quite quickly. In 1991, 3,672,914 persons lived in Sydney and 3,194,707 in Melbourne, a gap of 478,207 persons. By 2013, the gap had reduced to 409,128 persons.
During the same period, regional Queensland was the only regional market to record a greater increase in population than within the capital city. Over the period, Brisbane's population increased by a total of 826,621 persons compared to an 869,231 increase in Regional Queensland’s population.
The surge in population across Regional Queensland is linked to the growth in those markets directly adjacent to Brisbane, Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast.
Regional Queensland’s population has increased due to the ‘sea change’ phenomenon which has seen significant migration and development along the state’s coastal communities.
Over the year, the ABS reported that Australia's population increased by 1.8% with capital city regions recording population growth of 2.1% over the year compared to a 1.2% annual increase in regional population.
<img src="/images/2014/04/10/kusher-april-10-three.gif" alt="">
From 1995 onwards, capital city populations have consistently increased at a faster rate than those in regional areas. In June 1991, 64.6% of all Australian’s lived within a capital city and by June 2013 the proportion had risen to 66%.
Almost two thirds (66.3%) of all Australian’s live within a capital city, up from 64.6% in 1991.
Based on the ABS results, Australian’s are showing an ongoing preference to live in capital cities rather than regional markets. This is largely due to job security found in the cities.
With home values rising at a much faster rate in Sydney and in Melbourne than in other capital cities it will be interesting to see over the coming years if we see an outflow of population from Sydney and Melbourne to other more affordable capital city housing markets such as Brisbane and Adelaide.
Of course a key driver of any shift away from Sydney and Melbourne will be providing well-paid jobs and a high quality of life while ensuring that housing remains relatively more affordable than it is within Sydney and Melbourne.
</body></html>

Capital cities' job security remains attraction for population growth

<html><body>
Many residential property markets around Australia are currently in a ‘hot’ phase of their cycles. By that, I mean that these markets are in the maximum peak property values of their current market cycles.
It is a great time for sellers but a tough time for buyers.
Buyers in markets like Sydney, Brisbane, Perth and many regional centres are facing tough times right now. There are a number of contributing factors as to why these markets are so hot; not limited to the following:
<ul>
<li>A record low interest rate environment is encouraging some first time buyers in to the market who otherwise would not have been able to afford to.</li>
<li>First time Australian citizen investors, enticed by the low interest rates on offer and an increase in construction upstarts for off the plan investment purchases, are buying up properties at very high rates.</li>
<li>In regard to non-Australian-citizen/foreign investors, the introduction of relaxed government policy as well as incentives offered for certain degrees and levels of foreign investment in Australia has made for a property buying frenzy from foreign investors.</li>
<li>The ever-increasing urbanisation of Australia’s population is resulting in more people moving to capital cities as well as established regional cities also. This in turn adds demand.</li>
<li>The general ‘FOMO’ effect (fear of missing out) as a result of the above factors adds a heightened sense of urgency to another property-seeking group, mainly upgraders and second or third time property buyers.</li>
</ul>
All of this of course adds up to high asking prices in many markets. However, initial high buying prices isn’t the only challenge that occupants and residents of these hot markets will face. Different groups will be affected in these hot markets, and in different ways:
First home owners
Despite low interest rates on offer, first home buyers remain consistently out-bid and out-priced within their desired suburbs. The other worrying factor for these buyers is that even if they stretch to their absolute maximum buy rate to secure a property now, they are doing so in a very low interest rate environment.
If first home owners are stretched to their limits now, how they will cope when interest rates fluctuate back up to higher levels over the next 24 months?
I am not of the view that a massive property bubble is forming, however I don’t deny that in low middle income areas where first home buyer volumes are higher, should a significant volume of them fall under mortgage stress over the next couple of years property values in those areas may stagnate for several more years to come.
Australian-based investors
I use the phrase ‘Australian-based’ for this investor group to encompass both Australian citizens who naturalised in this country for most or all of their lives, as well as those who are newer arrivals to Australia but call Australia home (in other words, they live here full-time).
Investors who have purchased residential property in hot markets are no different to those who seek out properties in emerging or undervalued markets; all interested only in the return they get on their investment. This means that providing that either strong capital growth potential, or high rental return, are evidenced in a property purchase, they will consider a property in any market climate – hot or cold.
The problem is hot property markets mean that capital growth for that market/post code is usually at its maximum. That means that for investors seeking immediate capital growth, this will be unlikely for several more years because the property is at its peak right now.
<blockquote>
The consequences of suburb specific saturation by investors have not yet been truly seen.
</blockquote>
This means that if an investor in a hot market is truly a savvy buyer, versus a poorly-researched, ill-advised wannabe investor, they must be seeking 'hot’ (and immediate) rental return over capital growth.
That  paints an alarming picture for overall housing affordability in these markets. Investor owned properties must be charging very high rents to occupants of their properties right now to ensure their investment isn’t a massive loss-maker for them. That means that not only are property buying rates high in hot areas, but so are rents. Overall affordability to live in these cities  becomes poorer.
Non-Australian and foreign investors
Similar factors exist for foreign investors in comparison to local ones.
However, there is another factor at play. Recent investor profile data research from Australian Property Investor magazine suggests that local investors tend to buy in the same city (if not in a nearby suburb) to where they live. Foreign investors typically purchase, site-unseen, in markets that they have never lived in, nor even (in many instances) have visited.
I guess the missing ingredient here is the ‘sense of community’ that mass-property buying, condensed into a small group of ‘favoured’ suburbs or areas, erodes and the effect this has on an area. Some suburbs can become at risk of being investor ghettos whereby the ratio of owner-occupier to investor-owned property is so high that a genuine sense of community within that area becomes quickly eroded.
<blockquote>
Investors should look to emerging markets where owner-occupier to renter ratios are much more balanced.
</blockquote>
This then changes the dynamic of that entire area; eroding the gentrification developed over decades, in the space of just a decade or so of heavy investor-buying. Of course, it is not the fault of (nor should the blame be pointed at) the foreign investors themselves; but rather local and state councils, policy-makers and governments whose planning departments allow this occur, as well as property developers who exclusively market to foreign investors from the moment the first block foundation concrete is poured, en-mass. 
I draw a parallel here to post-World War Two Melbourne, where ‘outrage’ existed over the Italians buying out entire suburbs within just a couple of years after the war. The difference however, is that these communities owner-occupied the areas, made a great contribution to the ‘sense of community’ those areas had, and in hindsight were one of the major market driving factors that has given these suburbs the wonderful identity (and desirability) they have today. Yes, some areas were almost entirely ‘foreigner-owned’, but these people became locals and celebrated their communities.
Fast forward to 2014 and there is a lot of uncertainty around the concentrated foreign-investor buyouts of entire suburbs. This is because investors are not living in the suburbs themselves. They do not have say a vested interest in ensuring the local park lands are maintained, or that roads don’t become too congested, or that units and houses are not occupied by too many people, and so on.
It is no doubt clear that hot property markets offer rewards and benefits for some property owners. However, the implications of investor buying extend beyond just bumping the rental and purchase prices up. The consequences of suburb specific saturation by investors have not yet been truly seen. Ever the optimist as I am, I remain doubtful that investors buying in hot areas, at a grand scale, will be a positive thing for those areas.
Investors should look to emerging markets where owner-occupier to renter ratios are much more balanced.
</body></html>

cmcevoy-Go82SmsJA9

Investor saturation in suburb hotspots will have consequences for residents and investors

<html><body>
Demand for new housing in Sydney will continue to outstrip supply as development targets have been set too low to accommodate population growth, according to NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure director general Sam Haddad.
“Indicators are that for the next couple of years we are going to achieve our targets of 25,000 to 27,000 dwellings in Sydney and I’m not sure that’s enough,” Haddad said last week at an industry forum organised by the Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
The department last year predicted the NSW population would increase by two million people to reach 9.2 million by 2031. Since then it has been examining updated Australian Bureau of Statistics data and invested in improving its population forecasts.
“Indications are that we are expecting a much higher population than we have predicted before,” Haddad said.
A larger population in Sydney meant demand for new housing would be much higher than previously anticipated and the existing targets for housing development would be too low.
The total number of dwelling units approved in NSW fell 0.2% in February after rising for 24 months, ABS data shows.
Approval times for new dwellings fell in 2012-13 compared with the previous year, according to the Local Development Performance Monitoring Report for 2012-2013. It took 68 days on average to approve a development application in 2012-13, three days less than in the previous year. Fast-tracked approvals took 17 days on average, one day less than the year before.
Haddad said there was a lag between dwellings being approved and work commencing, which the department was trying to understand but its key focus was on driving changes to the NSW planning system.
The department released a white paper outlining a new planning system for NSW and draft planning legislation on April 16 last year. The paper and legislation were on public exhibition until June 28.
The draft legislation has not yet been passed but Haddad said he was hopeful that it would pass soon as existing legislation could not cope with changes to population, community and investor expectations, environmental concerns and how infrastructure was integrated into urban developments.
“NSW is changing and we need to look ahead as to how we are going to manage this change and manage growth ... The current planning legislation cannot cope with the change that I’m talking about. It can no longer deliver to the community,” he said.
</body></html>

zfielding-GvX3Uq9KTa

Housing development supply targets set too low: NSW Department of Planning and Infrastructure

<html><body>
Australia faces medium term challenges of paying for the things it wants to do as a society and finding enough workers as the population ages, Reserve Bank Governor Glenn Stevens says.
Stevens strongly backed Treasury Secretary Martin Parkinson who <a href="/expert-insights/finance/treasury-boss-hints-at-the-need-for-a-broader-gst">this week outlined</a> the huge calls on the budget over the coming years and urged a reweighing of the tax system to rely more on indirect taxes such as the GST.
Speaking in Brisbane, Stevens said it was becoming clear that programs were not fully funded by taxes over the medium term. “Our situation is not dire by the standards of other countries but neither are the issues trivial. A conversation needs to be had about this,” he said.
He described the Parkinson speech as “very important”.
Stevens said it was understandable that with announcements of job losses people focused on where future jobs would come from. But the problem was more likely to be not enough workers, rather than not enough jobs.
At present the number of new entrants to the workforce exceeded those retiring. 10 years from now, those numbers could be roughly equal, without a further rise in labour participation by older people.
“Demographic trends point in the direction of a smaller population working, and a larger proportion needing support in their later years, even as public demands on the finances for the provision of social goods increase.
“That looks like a pretty uncomfortable combination of trends.”
He said the answer to reconciling them was growth. To some extent we would hopefully be able to lessen the problem through higher labour participation, for longer. “But most of all we will need higher productivity of those working. That means making the system as flexible as possible and as encouraging as possible to innovation.”
For Australia one potential source of productivity improvement lay in the fact that across a range of sectors US productivity was much higher than our own. There were possibly substantial “catch up gains” to us by adopting better practices.
To those worried about projected job losses, Stevens pointed out that new jobs “will come from areas that we don’t see yet”.
“In the middle of 1991, at the low point of the last serious recession, people were very pessimistic about future employment prospects. The rate of unemployment was in double digits.
“But today, over 20 years later, there are nearly four million new jobs in the economy as there were then. The rate of unemployment, although it has gone up recently, is just slightly more than half what it was at its peak in the 1990s.
“It’s worth noting that none of those additional net jobs came from manufacturing,” Stevens said.
MICHELLE GRATTAN is professorial fellow at the <a href="https://www.canberra.edu.au/" target="_blank">University of Canberra</a>.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/25216/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="line-height: 1.3em;">
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. 
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

Finding workers and money our main worries: Glenn Stevens

<html><body>
2014 is still motoring along very strongly. The lull we reported of the last few weeks seems to have been nothing more than another stair landing in the continuously rising price-staircase which began in October 2012.
This weekend was another Super Saturday, with over 150 auctions in Melbourne’s inner east and Bayside. It was a very solid test, in that bidders were spread out over a large number of auctions – i.e. there was significant choice. The bidder depth held up, in fact it increased marginally with over two bidders per auction on average – this is strong.
If you look at the roughly 200 $1 million plus auctions that took place across all of Melbourne, an average of two bidders means that not only were there 200 buyers, there were also 200 bidders who missed out. Most of those “wounded” bidders are not discretionary buyers – they have to buy and next time they will be more aggressive on price, even if only a tad.
<blockquote>
For a number of our Chinese clients, one of the reasons we are engaged is that they are concerned what other Chinese buyers may do and they don’t want to miss out.
</blockquote>
However, after next week it gets very tight for new stock going into the school holidays and Easter. So the pool of choice will diminish. That means many of those 200 “wounded underbidders” may well be competing against you over Easter but on lower stock levels. That means we’re likely to see 200 underbidders competing not on 200 homes, but on, say, 100 good homes which would double the bidders. If that number is spread out over 50 good homes, that will be four times the bidder strength we saw this weekend.
So what to do as a buyer? Maybe it’s time to wait until the steam goes out of the market?
For those buyers still waiting on the edge for a downturn – good luck. I’m not sure that is a proven good strategy.
But surely it can’t last forever!
Why has our market been so good for so long and will it last?
The Chinese community – simple demand and supply
The reason our market has been so good for so long is very simple – the overseas Chinese community.
Here are the top 10 reported sales on Saturday.
The Top 10 reported on Saturday
<ul>
<li>14 Selwyn Av, ELWOOD – Above $3,600,000</li>
<li>
21 Monash Av, BALWYN – $3,520,000</li>
<li>17 Rolls Ct, GLEN WAVERLEY – $3,416,000</li>
<li>
65 Metung St, BALWYN Above $3,200,000</li>
<li>30 Wills St, KEW Above $3,000,000</li>
<li>4 Mt Ida Av, HAWTHORN EAST  $3,235,500</li>
<li>69 Alfred Cr, FITZROY NORTH  $3,140,000</li>
<li>
2 Barnsbury Rd, BALWYN Above $3,000,000</li>
<li>9 Fairfield Av, CAMBERWELL  $2,888,000</li>
<li>
65 Yarrbat Av, BALWYN $2,850,000</li>
</ul>
40% of those sales were in <a href="/news">Balwyn</a> for new homes or land blocks to build new homes. Where is <a href="/news">Brighton</a>, where is <a href="/news">Toorak</a>? <a href="/news">North Balwyn</a> and Balwyn reported 13 bought from a reported 15 auctions. Brighton had 9 bought from 16 and Toorak and <a href="/news">South Yarra</a> just 7 from 12.
So how long will it last?
This is my potted history of Chinese involvement in Melbourne’s property market.
1973: I went to Camberwell Grammar in the early 1970s (I’m not sure they want me to advertise that fact – it could be bad for new enrolments). Camberwell Grammar is in Balwyn and a number of my classmates at that time were Chinese.
1983: Chinese start buying into Doncaster and Box Hill, which were then more affordable suburbs. I grew up in Doncaster.
1993: After economic reforms start having an impact in China, wealthy overseas Chinese start buying into premium Melbourne suburbs such as Balwyn and <a href="/news">Canterbury</a>. Why? Private schools. Chinese people want to give their children the best education (see 1973) and now a few could also afford to buy a home near the schools of their choice such as Carey, MLC, Scotch and Camberwell Grammar. But it was still difficult under Australian buying laws for overseas people.
2000: With restrictions on what Chinese people could buy and Chinese wealth increasing, off the plan properties became popular for many Chinese buyers. There were very few restrictions on Chinese people buying new properties and Chinese people were used to buying new apartments. High rises went up left, right and centre in Melbourne, many on the back of Chinese money.
2005: Chinese wealth had increased dramatically over the last two decades and as Chinese buyers became wealthier they also became more sophisticated in their knowledge about Melbourne properties and Toorak became a place where land banking became popular. It still is today.
2009: Australian government changes the laws making buying “second-hand” family homes in Australia a lot easier for Chinese people. This one decision really brought the inner Melbourne property market out of the GFC a lot quicker than other countries.
2013: By this time, every one of the bigger buying or selling real estate agencies, ourselves included, has at least one Mandarin-speaking staff member.
2014 : At this weekend’s Super Saturday, 40% of our Top 10 $3m+ sales were in Balwyn, rather than Toorak or Brighton.
So in my 55 year history I have seen this equation of simple demand (increasing Chinese buyers) versus supply (no new land in inner Melbourne) push prices up and up and up. I cannot see anything changing anytime soon. So waiting for the market to turn in 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010 hasn’t in my mind proven to be a winning strategy. If you see the right home for you (emotionally, physically and financially) then you should buy it now.
You may be interested to know that for a number of our Chinese clients, one of the reasons we are engaged is that they are concerned what other Chinese buyers may do and they don’t want to miss out.
Auctions in Bayside see around half  the number of people attending as in Boroondara. A good auction in Brighton has 40 people while in Kew it would be 80. The Chinese community is nowhere near as well established in Bayside as it is in Boroondara.
Why not? There are some great private schools in Bayside! St Leonards, Haileybury, Caulfield Grammar.
Its a historical thing. But you can see more and more Chinese people considering say other areas such as Brighton when:
<ul>
<li>Chinese people become more comfortable with Bayside as a place to live, and</li>
<li>Demand in Boroondara and then Stonnington forces some Chinese people to consider other options.</li>
</ul>
Over time the Chinese community demand and supply equation will have the same effect in Bayside as it has had in Boroondara, unless China’s wealth begins to diminish.
</body></html>

maljames-vHwm28JUAa

Chinese buyers in Melbourne: A simple case of supply and demand

<html><body>
Someone asked me last week if I am "bullish on property?".
It's a bit of wild concept if you think about it.
At the last count there are around 9,300,700 dwellings in Australia, and the vast majority of them I wouldn't invest in.
There are a huge number of areas that I would consider to be extremely risky, in fact, including a whole range of mining towns and regional centres, and even some larger cities with weak population growth and job markets.
My position always been that if you can demonstrate a certain level of skill and invest in the right suburbs and property types you can make a lot of money, but I wouldn't say that makes me bullish on housing per se.
In Britain, London and its surrounds has been the only area worthy of investing for my money over all the years.
In Australia, I generally stick to certain suburbs in Sydney. 
In 2007, that meant a number of key suburbs in the inner west, and even then only certain types of property. 
Last year we were buying on the lower north shore, but again only in a handful of suburbs and certain types of property. 
At the weekend, the lower north recorded another blistering auction clearance rate of 92%. 
I wouldn't get too bogged down in the weekly conspiracy theories about under-reporting: just look at the actual results <a href="https://domainmastheads.homepriceguide.com.au/saturday_auction_results/Sydney.pdf" target="_blank">reported</a> in suburbs like Kirribilli, Wollstonecraft, Cremorne and Neutral Bay. 
The lower north shore is now absolutely flying!
We expect to see Milsons Point and Waverton outperforming in 2014 too.
We try to avoid buying in heated markets, however, so we may leave the hordes to the auction frenzies at ever-higher prices now, and look elsewhere.
Next on our hit-list will include three suburbs in particular to the west and south-west, a little further out than the traditional capital growth hotspots, in order to catch the ripple effect of capital growth which is repeated in most property market cycles. 
March property prices 
RP Data will released its <a href="/expert-insights/investing/melbourne-tops-the-list-of-best-performing-capital-cities-in-march-quarter-rp-data-rismark">property price results for the month of March</a>, which unsurprisingly will continue to report very strong gains in Australian capital cities (+2.3%) for the 10th month in a row.
Leading the way, of course, were Sydney (+2.8%) and Melbourne (+2.3%), although in fact gains were recorded everywhere in March.
Over the past 12 months, the best performing capital city has continued to be Sydney, and the worst, perhaps not surprisingly given its weak jobs market and low population growth, Adelaide.
<a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-j43vYsDmeWo/Uzjzxz9ceQI/AAAAAAAAMN4/3tun4W9-5oA/s1600/RPD111.jpg"><img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-j43vYsDmeWo/Uzjzxz9ceQI/AAAAAAAAMN4/3tun4W9-5oA/s1600/RPD111.jpg" width="460" height="181"></a>
Philosophy 
Like most people, my investment philosophy has changed a bit over time, but the basic principles remain the same.
About a decade and a half ago, Robert Kiyosaki wrote a book, Rich Dad Poor Dad, which showed a diagram something like the one below which demonstrates the difference between the typical financial profile of a salary earner (lots of expenses, lots of liabilities) and that of an investor (fewer expenses and lots of income-producing assets).
<blockquote>
My basic philosophy is to think of investment as being like a snowball, compounding and growing its income and capital appreciation year after year, for as long as I live.
</blockquote>
Spending less than you earn and investing the difference was a real "aha!" or "light bulb" moment for millions of people around the globe. Kiyosaki sold 26 million copies of that book alone and went on to build a substantial business empire from this one very simple core idea.
<div><img src="https://www.richdad.com/MediaLibrary/RichDad/images/blogs/rdpd-wealthy-vs-middleclass-chart.jpg" width="400" height="303"></div>
Concept: Robert Kiyosaki
Kiyosaki's point was that investors should try to avoid getting into bad debts (credit cards, car loans, school loans etc) and instead load up the asset column with your business, real estate and stocks.
My one simple big idea
Like many people I've experimented with a few different approaches, including trading or buying speculative stocks. These days I have stripped back my investment philosophy to keep it as simple as humanly possible. My one simple ideas as it relates to my investment philosophy is this: 
I want every single dollar I invest to still be going out to work for me if I live to be 110 years old. 
That's my basic philosophy, to think of investment as being like a snowball, compounding and growing its income and capital appreciation year after year, for as long as I live.
What to invest in? 
So what assets to invest in to achieve that goal? 
You can spend a lot of time analysing companies and still get it wrong. The simplest method for most average investors might be to pick out some diversified Listed Investment Companies (LICs) which have a proven track record of increasing their profits and dividends for decade after decade after decade.
I don't recommend individual stocks for others to invest in. You have to pick companies which suit your own risk profile. But this is the kind of chart that I look for:
<div class="separator"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iZUT2PTDq2g/Uznpgh8Z4HI/AAAAAAAAMOI/AX9f8KgSmjc/s1600/MLT.jpg"><img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-iZUT2PTDq2g/Uznpgh8Z4HI/AAAAAAAAMOI/AX9f8KgSmjc/s1600/MLT.jpg" width="400" height="173"></a></div>
<div class="separator"> </div>
<div class="separator">Source: MLT Annual Report 2013</div>
<div class="separator"> </div>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7UCvvjPl6TU/Uzn3J6MCj2I/AAAAAAAAMPA/lWOyNZnEWAY/s1600/WHF.jpg"><img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7UCvvjPl6TU/Uzn3J6MCj2I/AAAAAAAAMPA/lWOyNZnEWAY/s1600/WHF.jpg" width="400" height="236"></a></div>
Source: WHF Annual Report 2013
If a company can achieve this type of result with its bottom line profits with its and franked dividend payments then the share price will likely take care of itself over time.  Through investing in these types of diversified companies your dollars can go to work for you from now until... forever.
You don't even need to know what the wires do, although of course, you can lift the cover plate and see what the inner workings are up to if you so desire.
<div class="separator"><a href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-m6Ug96wmaaE/UznqPMdYIPI/AAAAAAAAMOQ/Yg_SYJCw978/s1600/BKI.jpg"><img src="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-m6Ug96wmaaE/UznqPMdYIPI/AAAAAAAAMOQ/Yg_SYJCw978/s1600/BKI.jpg" width="400" height="317"></a></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Source: BKI Annual Report 2013</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-a8UdJKNChMo/Uzn2XPoACII/AAAAAAAAMO4/eTCnft7XLm0/s1600/ARGO.jpg"><img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-a8UdJKNChMo/Uzn2XPoACII/AAAAAAAAMO4/eTCnft7XLm0/s1600/ARGO.jpg" width="400" height="371"></a></div>
Source: ARG Annual Report 2013
Companies may in theory be perpetual but, surprisingly, many of them come and go. How much more re-assuring it is to be invested in a company which holds 100-120 top companies and trusts? Even if one of the companies held experiences a huge corporate fraud or failure, the investor should not be hurt too much. I covered in more detail why I like LICs <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/5-reasons-to-consider-lic" target="_blank">here</a>.
Real estate 
I apply very similar principles in property investment. I want to invest in cities which will still be thriving if I live to be 110 years old. That means that for the core of my portfolio, I tend to steer away from small regional cities or one-industry towns. 
It's no coincidence that my company has offices in London and Sydney, by the way, for those are two cities with tremendously strong fundamentals for the long-term.
Knight Frank reported yesterday that London prices are up by 68% in the last five years since March 2009. How on earth, and why on earth, is that happening? 
It's partly because of desperately inadequate construction. Parts of the market are desperately undersupplied and the activity in the market resembles a feeding frenzy at the moment.
It's also because in recent times, there has been a tremendous shift of funds towards residential real estate as a store of wealth, but only in certain key global cities. It's fairly obvious why prices have been growing when you consider this chart.
<div><img src="https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/images/user5/imageroot/2014/03/London%20market_0.jpg" width="400" height="322"></div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you know your history, you'll know that London has had something of a rollercoaster ride as a city.</div>
<div> </div>
<div class="separator"><a href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gLopaBB9AhA/UzntvXvbM7I/AAAAAAAAMOc/wCMOLBe16KE/s1600/LONPOP.jpg"><img src="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-gLopaBB9AhA/UzntvXvbM7I/AAAAAAAAMOc/wCMOLBe16KE/s1600/LONPOP.jpg" width="460" height="275"></a></div>
Centuries ago we had wars, plagues and even a Great Fire, and from the Second World War through to 1991 the city population declined for five consecutive decades as the city de-industrialised and went through a process of slum clearance and suburbanisation. 
Since 1991, London has been busy establishing itself as a major financial centre, and international migration combined with an economic boom has seen the population explode from 6.4 million to above 8.1 million. London's population has been increasing at twice the speed of that of the rest of the UK and is expected to surpass 9 million by the end of this decade.
Importantly, the population in inner London has often been expanding at the same percentage rate as that of the Greater City of London, despite the limited availability of land. I don't worry too much what the talking heads in the press consider likely to happen this year or next. I just know that over the decades, London property will continue to represent an absolute no-brainer.
Sydney
As a newer city, Sydney has not been through such a rollercoaster ride: the population trend is simply up, up, up and away.
The below is a dated population projection from the Bureau of Statistics. More recent data suggests that the estimates have been under-cooked and that Sydney's population could rise much more rapidly still than this (click chart) to <a href="https://www.afr.com/f/free/national/why_australia_needs_to_get_real_7hEC3IX0RZWitSkELPcJEI" target="_blank">around 8 million by 2050</a>, instead following the trajectory of the red line (click chart). 
<div class="separator"><a href="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bS0zccQITYI/Uzn49dmzSuI/AAAAAAAAMPM/WMo25KmGhDU/s1600/POPSYD.jpg"><img src="https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-bS0zccQITYI/Uzn49dmzSuI/AAAAAAAAMPM/WMo25KmGhDU/s1600/POPSYD.jpg" width="460" height="245"></a></div>
So much energy is diverted towards what might happen to prices in the next 12 months, but as an investor, inactivity can actually be your greatest friend. 
As for the flow of international funds, well let's be blunt: this will have very little (if any impact) on regional centres. The impact will be felt most keenly in inner Sydney where land is scarce, and inner Melbourne.
Through owning properties in suburbs where the supply is fixed you can be assured that your dollars you invested in investment properties will still be out there working for you for decades and decades to come. And more comforting still, the nature of compound growth means that they gains just get better and better over time. 
You can visit <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) or Pete's <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blog</a>.
His new book '<a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>' is out now.
</body></html>

Demographics

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Demographics

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News