An entity directed by HSN's Rafi Assouline and Rebel Property's Allen Linz has filed plans for an impressive new precinct in Woolloomooloo.

The major mixed-use development would transform a prominent William Street site into a new residential village anchored by affordable housing and a large public park.

The proposal, submitted as a State Significant Development Application, covers 164-172 and 174-194 William Street, a 6,398 sqm site between Forbes Street and Dowling Street on the southern edge of Woolloomooloo.

Designed by fjcstudio in collaboration with Bangawarra, Studio Bright and Tribe Studio Architects, the scheme would deliver 227 apartments across four residential buildings ranging in height up to 18 storeys, alongside retail space, public domain improvements and a new publicly accessible park.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0eb59b7c-914a-4a5c-b849-3a56749f5e93" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.18.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=mxM6EEqeoLjrCiTlCzTKTvzpKuh6kSkH" />

It's another design scheme for Rebel, who took <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-rebel-property-group-takes-woolloomooloo-precinct-to-nsw-government">concept plans to the NSW Gov late last year</a>.

The latest plans will be a mix of 167 build-to-sell apartments and 60 affordable apartments, with the affordable housing component representing 15 per cent of the project's gross floor area. The apartment mix includes 12 one-bedroom, 53 two-bedroom, 89 three-bedroom apartments and 13 penthouses, while the affordable housing component would comprise 42 one-bedroom and 18 two-bedroom apartments.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3b3d4553-8a8c-4af5-aa8c-519ffb1e28c6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.12%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=_Yb6ibN7eDnOtQjCNDK2eviORa4qzgv." />

Rebel Property is seeking to take advantage of the NSW Government's infill affordable housing bonus provisions under the Housing SEPP, which provide additional floor space and height in exchange for the delivery of affordable housing for a minimum of 15 years. The planning pathway allows a 30 per cent increase in floor space ratio and building height where 15 per cent of the development is dedicated to affordable housing.

&nbsp;

At the centre of the development is a 1,356 sqm sunlit public park designed to become a new community gathering space at the gateway to Woolloomooloo. The park would be complemented by a network of pedestrian laneways connecting William Street with the surrounding streets, improving permeability through what is currently a largely impermeable block.

<img alt="Rebel" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="257af931-a393-4007-8c6d-7219796df58d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-12%20at%2011.20.51%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=KAHy94GrhaReFsWTGDKfy39EDJ8gEEv4" />

The design team says the public domain has been heavily influenced by the site's topography and Aboriginal cultural heritage, drawing on the escarpments, gullies and landscape characteristics that historically defined the area before urbanisation. The landscape design has been developed in partnership with First Nations consultancy Bangawarra.

The project would be delivered across four separate buildings. The William Street East and William Street West buildings, designed by fjcstudio, would contain the majority of the apartments. Melbourne-based Studio Bright has designed the Forbes Street building, while Tribe Studio Architects is responsible for the Dowling Street building.

Rebel had secured approval for the concept plans late last year.

Joel Robinson

First look: HSN, Rebel, advances Woolloomooloo precinct plans

A locally heritage-listed furniture showroom on Water Street is set to become the centrepiece of a new mixed-use residential development as local developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/keylin-group">Keylin</a> seeks approval for <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lotus-on-water-street-290-water-street-fortitude-valley-qld-4006">Lotus on Water Street</a>, a 15-storey project on the Fortitude Valley side of Spring Hill.

The proposal spans 290 Water Street and 137-141 Warry Street, combining several properties into a 2,869 sqm site that sits between Fortitude Valley, Spring Hill and the rapidly evolving Victoria Park precinct. Keylin's plans would deliver 132 apartments alongside new retail, hospitality and commercial space, while retaining and repurposing the historic Brunswick Home Furnishers Showroom that fronts Water Street.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/jackson-teece">Jackson Teece</a>, Lotus on Water Street comprises a 12-storey residential tower rising above a three-storey podium and communal rooftop terrace. The development includes 76 apartments classified as multiple dwellings and a further 56 units proposed as short-term accommodation, designed to be flexibly used as either accommodation or permanent residences. The apartment mix comprises six one-bedroom, 54 two-bedroom and 16 three-bedroom homes.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9822bb79-6c49-49c9-95ba-319e8c8d81c3" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20front.png?VersionId=ioW8zbN4UVebbLetTFuv92t.HkdgfR5e" />

Residents would have access to an extensive rooftop recreation level spanning more than 1,200 sqm of communal open space. Plans include a pool, gym, sauna, infrared sauna, yoga area, library, private dining room, barbecue facilities and landscaped entertainment spaces, making the rooftop the project's largest shared amenity offering.

At street level, the proposal focuses on the adaptive reuse of the heritage buildings along Water Street, where 518 sqm of retail and commercial space is planned across shop, office and food and drink outlet uses. A permeable residential lobby would be positioned between the retained heritage buildings, creating a pedestrian connection between the historic streetscape and the new tower behind.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="269cf3e0-7d13-48bf-a318-05a00deb5c10" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20podium.png?VersionId=DLXmTCLsp6GOcLpQ0h.0z7wKCw59EhN_" />

The heritage retention strategy is central to the scheme. The development application notes that the Brunswick Home Furnishers Showroom and adjoining heritage buildings will remain, with only non-significant structures on the site earmarked for removal under a previously issued Heritage Exemption Certificate. Levels one and two of the new podium are recessed behind the heritage façades to maintain their prominence within the streetscape.

Jackson Teece has drawn inspiration from the site's manufacturing history when designing the podium. The planning documents state that the façade incorporates perforated metal screening that references the woven and rattan furniture historically produced on the site. Cascading and climbing plants are integrated throughout the podium to soften the building's presentation and screen parking levels behind. The landscape strategy also informs the project's name, Lotus on Water Street, drawing on the historic Spring Hollow waterholes that once ran through Spring Hill and the blue water lilies associated with Meeanjin, Brisbane's traditional name.

The proposal also incorporates the neighbouring property at 141 Warry Street, currently occupied by a healthcare service. The existing building would remain, with nine dedicated parking spaces allocated within the new development to support its ongoing operation. In total, Lotus on Water Street proposes 117 car spaces, including 110 resident spaces and seven visitor bays, alongside 100 bicycle spaces.

<img alt="First look: Keylin unveils heritage-led Lotus on Water Street tower in Fortitude Valley" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="70cf07bc-4fd8-4e70-92dd-be8b21c4e4f0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/fortitude%20valley%20site.png?VersionId=txlxrJImM0Sm_vTzHVKh5DDUkyL_CiiA" />

The site sits within the Spring Hill East Precinct of the Spring Hill Neighbourhood Plan and is positioned around 650 metres from both Fortitude Valley Station and Exhibition Station. It is also within walking distance of the King Street precinct, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston Quarter and Victoria Park, which is earmarked to become a major venue precinct ahead of the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games.

Planning documents describe the location as a key gateway between Spring Hill and Fortitude Valley and highlight the area's increasing importance as new transport infrastructure and Olympic-related investment reshape Brisbane's inner north. The development team argues the project will contribute additional housing supply while activating a section of Water Street that has historically received less investment than other parts of the Valley.

Keylin has become increasingly active across Brisbane and southeast Queensland, assembling sites in strategic inner-city locations. They are currently selling and delivering <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/oria-spring-hill-447-gregory-terrace-spring-hill-qld-4000">Oria Spring Hill</a>, just over 140 apartments due for completion in 2027.

Keylin plans heritage-led Lotus on Water Street apartment development in Fortitude Valley

Roseville is poised for a wave of new apartment development following the NSW Government's rezoning of land around Roseville Station under its Transport Oriented Development program.

The new planning controls have unlocked significant development potential within walking distance of the station, with a number of sites expected to be amalgamated and redeveloped in the coming years as developers seek to take advantage of the increased density allowances.

One of the more restrained developments in the precinct, and set among the first to be delivered having commenced well before the recent changes, is Hyecorp's Juliet. The boutique apartment project is already well under construction and remains on track to welcome residents by the end of the year, offering a markedly different proposition to many of the larger-scale developments now likely to emerge across the suburb.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278194]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/juliet-roseville-64-pacific-highway-roseville-nsw-2069">Juliet</a> will comprise just&nbsp;34 one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments opposite Roseville Station. For Hyecorp, which has delivered projects across Sydney's Lower North Shore for more than three decades, Roseville presented a rare opportunity to address a growing gap in the market.

"<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/roseville-nsw-2069">Roseville</a> has long been one of the North Shore's most tightly held and desirable suburbs, offering a unique combination of village charm, established greenery, excellent transport connections, and proximity to some of Sydney's best schools and lifestyle amenities," Hyecorp said.

"We recognised a growing demand from local homeowners seeking to downsize without leaving the community they have built their lives around. The location presented a rare opportunity to create homes that cater specifically to that buyer profile."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278196]

The six-level development has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/pbd-architects">PBD Architects</a> as a collection of residences that feel more like homes than apartments. The brief centred generous floorplans, abundant natural light, quality finishes, and strong connections to outdoor space.

PBD Architects drew inspiration from Roseville's established garden suburb character, creating a building that sits comfortably within its surroundings rather than dominating them. The architecture incorporates natural materials, soft forms, layered landscaping, expansive balconies, and generous setbacks to strengthen the connection between residents and the suburb's leafy environment.

"The focus was on designing spacious, house-like residences for discerning owner-occupiers and downsizers who wanted to remain on the North Shore without compromising on comfort, privacy, or design," PBD said.&nbsp;

"Every apartment was to feel considered, timeless, and highly functional."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278195]

Inside, residences feature engineered timber flooring, stone kitchen benchtops and splashbacks, integrated Fisher &amp; Paykel appliances, ducted air conditioning, and large outdoor entertaining areas designed to take advantage of district and treetop views.

Residents will also have access to a rooftop barbecue and lounge area, alongside practical amenities including parcel lockers, EV charging capability, bicycle storage, a dog wash bay, and a basement car wash facility.

The majority of purchasers so far have been local owner-occupiers from Roseville, Lindfield, Chatswood, Killara, and the broader Upper North Shore, many of whom are transitioning from larger family homes.

"Buyers are looking for spacious, house-like apartments that allow them to downsize without feeling like they are sacrificing comfort or functionality," Hyecorp noted.

"They value large kitchens, generous living areas, ample storage, quality finishes, secure parking, lift access, and low-maintenance living."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7395 project_image_fid=278204]

Juliet sits directly opposite Roseville Train Station and within walking distance of Roseville Village, while Chatswood's retail and dining precinct is only minutes away. The development is also surrounded by some of Sydney's most established schools, including Roseville College, Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College, and Knox Grammar, as well as nearby parklands and golf courses.

Juliet is currently more than 75 per cent sold ahead of its anticipated completion in late 2026.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7395]

Juliet to sit quietly amid Roseville apartment boom

Sherpa Property Group has unveiled the third instalment of its Flourish series, securing full approval for the two-tower, $500 million Flourish Soleira development in Palm Beach.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-1150-1154-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a> will rise from a prominent site in the commercial heart of Palm Beach, the long-time home of Cash Converters and a range of local retailers.

The project will introduce a new retail and dining precinct at ground level, beneath 286 apartments.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370959]

“We’re very committed to not only providing affordable residential offerings that are much needed in Palm Beach, but also delivering a vibrant new commercial heart that complements the extraordinary growth of the southern Gold Coast,” Sherpa Property Group founder Christie Leet said.

The development will sit under Sherpa's Flourish brand, which is aimed at providing a pathway into the beachside suburb for locals, first-home buyers and downsizers. In a move designed to assist first-home buyers entering the market, Sherpa has reserved all one and two-bedroom, one-bathroom apartments exclusively for eligible first-home buyers.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=370964]

“Our vision through Flourish is to create a vibrant retail and lifestyle focal point within the Palm Beach centre zone, delivering thriving communities underpinned by lifestyle-rich locations,” Leet said.

“So far, Flourish has been an incredible success, and we hope to carry this momentum as we progress the next two Flourish projects in Palm Beach.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150017 project_image_fid=371430]

Located across 1150-1164 Gold Coast Highway and 3 Sixth Avenue, the development will comprise two towers. The northern tower will deliver 154 apartments, while the southern tower will add a further 132 residences, helping address ongoing demand for new apartments in the tightly held coastal suburb.

Flourish Soleira will also feature the most extensive rooftop amenity offering ever delivered in Palm Beach.

The two towers will be connected by a skybridge, with residents gaining access to a rooftop recreation deck featuring a full-width swimming pool, hot and cold plunge pools, wellness spaces, a gymnasium, private dining facilities, massage treatment rooms, barbecue areas, a basketball court, golf simulator, indoor and outdoor dining spaces, sun lounges and extensive landscaping.

LPS Group is expected to start construction later this year.

Sherpa is already well advanced on construction of its debut Flourish project, Flourish Amargo, located just around the corner from Soleira. Meanwhile, Flourish Oasis, positioned opposite Amargo, recently commenced construction and has nearly sold out its collection of 47 apartments.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150017]

Sherpa unveils $500m mixed-use Palm Beach precinct, Flourish Soleira

Are mortgage holders set to get a reprieve from the RBA in 2026?

Big Four bank NAB believes so. They are now expecting the next move from the RBA to be a cut, rather than a hike, which they had pencilled in for August. They are unsure of the timing of the cut however, they note in their latest&nbsp;NAB Economics RBA Watch.

NAB Chief Economist, Dr Sally Auld, said recent data suggests the economy has lost momentum and the outlook for rates has shifted, noting that the broader economic backdrop has changed since earlier in the year.

“The next move in the cash rate is likely to be down, but the timing is uncertain," Dr Auld said.

"In February, growth was above trend, the economy was operating above capacity and there was uncertainty over the restrictiveness of rates. None of these conditions exist today,” she outlined.

Dr Auld said recent data pointed to softer momentum across the economy while acknowledging that at the same time, uncertainty remains a key feature of the outlook.

“Both Q1 GDP data and the NAB business survey suggest momentum in the economy has slowed, meaning that growth has likely peaked for the cycle. That said, we are cognisant there is still considerable uncertainty around the outlook, both with respect to activity and inflation.”

Dr Auld said inflation risks and labour market outcomes would be important to watch.

“On the prices side, we are still forecasting above target core inflation through to mid-2027. Margins will compress and weaker labour market outcomes are a risk.”

She said tighter financial conditions are expected to weigh on housing and activity.

“Tighter financial conditions will be reflected in a slowing in house price growth and housing credit growth. In summary, we have greater conviction that the next move in rates is down, but less conviction on the timing.”

Mortgage relief? NAB forecasts RBA rate cut, not hike, after softer economic conditions

Budget

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The Abbott government is preparing to give Sydney’s WestConnex road project a <a href="https://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/westconnex-to-get-2bn-in-budget-20140508-37wzp" target="_blank">A$2 billion boost</a> in this week’s federal budget, part of a broader $10 billion <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-05-08/government-to-detail-road-funding-and-detention-centre-closures/5437748" target="_blank">infrastructure package</a> aimed at boosting productivity and private sector investment.
Congestion in Sydney continues to escalate with gridlock on roads impacting passenger and freight logistics. The persistence of this situation reflects poorly on project selection and asset management processes, along with distortions that have arisen from poor interactions between the Commonwealth and the states.
Reform is urgently needed where there is less focus on ribbon cutting and more use of well-targeted “pinch point” interventions.
For example, removing congestion and bottlenecks from existing infrastructure along with shifting a small amount of demand from the peak to the shoulder period can often have superior productivity impacts compared with building expensive greenfield assets.
The school holiday effect on roads is an example of this point, when there are better traffic flows when less than 5% of traffic is absent in the peak. Surely there must be a way to win the community’s confidence that we can make the peak hour work better by shaping demand through means other than just pricing. Changing school opening times and retail operating hours could be a starting point.
Thinking beyond roads
While NSW has a strong case to build more new infrastructure like WestConnex and North Connex; it must use these once in a lifetime opportunities to do much more than build a new road.
The reality is the Sydney of today and yesterday is simply too “land hungry” to be sustainable into the 22nd century.
The appetite for land, unchecked with proper pricing signals for the provision of infrastructure has seen an un-virtuous cycle demanding ever more capital and diminishing return.
Many Sydney-siders have sought relief from escalating land prices on the city fringes, and have done so without the benefit of any genuine choice on where else they could live. Spacious residences on the fringe compare poorly in their mind to the expensive “compact” living of the inner areas.
Important projects like WestConnex can be a catalyst for triggering a new wave of innovative investment, that is, if we consider WestConnex the road project and WestConnex the urban revitalisation project.
A critical question that needs to be answered is how much extra housing and urban revitalising can and should we expect from WestConnex?
Despite the best intentions of those tasked with delivering WestConnex the public documentation suggests that the A$11.5 billion price tag will only deliver 25,000 new strategically located residences for Sydney over 20 years.
Sydney requires at least 800,000 new residences by 2050.
Given that WestConnex is developing such a valuable artery for the city, can it do more?
The first step will require governance model that breaks down traditional administrative silos and enables integrated land use and transport planning to occur.
Productivity matters
The objective of lifting state productivity has been missing from project planning in the past, making it difficult for governments to be purposeful and consistent in their infrastructure decisions in recent decades.
To accommodate the extra three million people by mid-century in NSW, the stock of transport infrastructure will need to either expand by 60% or its productivity must lift by a similar magnitude.
Obviously, it will be some combination of the two.
But anyone flying into Sydney can see that there is not a lot of room for new roads and rail systems. So productivity is going to matter a great deal.
To that end the regulatory system requires reform, as it must provide the right price signals and incentives to make the best use of existing infrastructure. This means a willingness to allow prices to reflect full cost recovery for the infrastructure provided.
Tolls are an option, but a toll should always be a fee for a defined level of service, and the community has the right to expect choice in the services available. The problem is that infrastructure often fails this test to the detriment of business and community confidence.
Tolls need to be justified
It is notable that the M1, M2, M4 and M5 toll roads in Sydney all originally demonstrated great benefit to commuters with faster travel time. But the reality is that now each of these toll roads has a peak hour exceeding 10 hours per day; slow speed and uncertain travel time is the norm.
To address this situation, state and federal infrastructure agencies need to enshrine customer service benchmarks that govern lifetime performance of major assets and networks. Government and the private sector concession holders will then require a framework to sustain them together.
Citizens living in our global cities expect globally competitive transit times during the peak hour. But the reality is Sydney has an average commute speed in peak hour that is 17% lower than London, at just 50km/h, and Melbourne is only marginally better.
Given Sydney and Melbourne are small cities by comparison to London, this is a concerning signal about the health of the road transport system.
Using tolls to help fund transport infrastructure is reasonable but without service benchmarks such as minimum speed guarantees in the peak then commuters are not assured of value for money; a toll becomes just another tax.
Tolls and user charges are not a panacea without fundamental institutional reform. Infrastructure must perform a service to the community that is relevant and compelling in order to justify a user charge in the first place. This is one of the missing ingredients to a successful infrastructure future.
Garry Bowditch is CEO, SMART Infrastructure Facility at University of Wollongong.
Garry Bowditch does not work for, consult to, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has no relevant affiliations.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

gbowditch-XhQ427ncp8

The budget will be big on infrastructure, but we need more than just roads

<html><body>
The National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS) has been debated heavily in recent weeks and the federal budget will be heavily scrutinised to see what changes, if any, will be made.
However, Property Asset Planning’s managing director Brian Chant said that he was in support of the Property Council of Australia’s executive director of the residential development council, Nick Proud, for the federal government to continue their support of the scheme.
Chant, it is noted, has sold hundreds of NRAS properties in South Australia under the name NRAS4SA.
“In South Australia we have seen little evidence of problems with NRAS which have been recently reported in The Australian newspaper and other national media,” said Chant.
YOU MIGHT ALSO WANT TO READ: <a href="/expert-insights/scrapping-nras-should-the-affordability-scheme-continue">Scrapping NRAS: Should the affordability scheme continue?</a>
Chant noted that the criticisms, which suggested that international students were benefiting from NRAS, was not an issue in South Australia.
“To suggest that the program should be wound up is short sighted and misguided. Australians consistently nominate housing affordability and supply as a top five issue and this is the one Federal Government program that aims to address Australia’s housing shortage,” he said.
“Given the success I have seen from the point of view of both investors and a tenant I see no reason to scrap NRAS now. Yes there are a few areas that need to be tightened up but lets not start from scratch with a new program to address an urgent problem.”
“Combining changes to negative gearing with a reinvigorated NRAS program will, based on our experience in South Australia, make a huge difference and very quickly,” Chant said.
Green Building Council of Australia chief operating officer Robin Mellon also agreed with the Proud’s comments.
He pointed to recent comments from Proud that claimed ditching NRAS would be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
“Increasing housing affordability in Australia requires a range of complementary measures, together with commitment from industry and all levels of government. NRAS is a vital piece of the jigsaw – one that we can't afford to lose,” Mellon said.
An academic from a research hub has <a href="/expert-insights/investing/nras-fears-are-misplaced">also said that NRAS fears are misplaced</a>.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Property Asset Planning supports call for federal government to continue NRAS

<html><body>
Well it’s that time of the year when Australian taxpayers prepare themselves to get their annual slap across the face with a couple of moist lettuce leaves.
Yes – the 2014/15 federal budget is now less than one day away and just like the budgets before this one the warnings, threats and pugnacious leaks usually amount to next to nothing. The reason why? Politicians have an addiction to being re-elected which is contingent on strong polling performances despite our economy growing slightly below trend.
Historically real estate has been a minor player come budget time with the government of the day preferring to address the industry from more of a macro positioning given that is by far an easier option when compared to a micro-economic analysis. For all intents and purposes if the real estate/housing demographic were that essential, then it would be fair to say there would actually be a designated Housing Minister which is not the case with the Abbott led government.
Although it should be noted that <a href="/expert-insights/finance/governments-take-out-a-lot-more-through-property-tax-than-is-given-back">governments take out a lot more through property tax than is given back </a>– real estate is a cash cow of choice for all three levels of government – including through stamp duty, land tax, capital gains tax, rates and infrastructure charges. It would be reasonable to suggest that one of the compelling reasons as to why the GST has been left out until the next election is because the state governments reneged on their 2000 tax obligations when the GST was introduced. If and when the GST is discussed the states and territories will have to make some significant tax adjustments given the decision will be made by referendum.
Negative gearing will escape greater scrutiny in this year’s budget despite the government having to fund $5 billion each year and growing tax concessions.
Given the ongoing debates attributed to housing affordability it will only be a matter of time before we see a tapering in the annual tax concessions which would also lend significant weight to investors contemplating a move away from traditional bricks and mortar – any such decision would be staggered over a 15 to 20 year period.
<a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/8-05-2014-1-19-04-PM.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8531" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/8-05-2014-1-19-04-PM.jpg" alt="8-05-2014 1-19-04 PM" width="646" height="395"></a>
Source: OECD
 
As with every budget the Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA) had their say into negative gearing and pointed out that Australian Taxation Office (ATO) data shows fewer than 80% of total individual taxpayers that are claiming a tax deduction from property earn less than $80,000 per annum.
The OECD eloquently summed up Australia’s economic position this week when it released their economic outlook for May:
“Output is projected to increase by 2 ½% in 2014 and by nearly 3% in 2015, with a general pick – up in demand offsetting declining investment in the resources sector.
"Some economic slack will remain and the unemployment rate will not begin to edge down until the second half of 2015. As a result there will be little inflation pressure, although rapid growth in house prices and mortgage lending requires continued attention.
"Given near – term uncertainties in the re – balancing of the economy away from investment in the natural resources sector, heavy front loading of fiscal consolidation should be avoided.
"Against the backdrop of the projected recovery, monetary stimulus should start to be withdrawn in the first half of 2015.”
It will be fascinating to see how much of this the federal government adopts with next week’s budget.
<a href="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/26-04-2014-10-07-22-AM.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8533" src="https://www.rwm.com.au/files/2014/05/26-04-2014-10-07-22-AM.jpg" alt="26-04-2014 10-07-22 AM" width="660" height="364"></a>
Source: Australian Property Monitors
With regard to the OECD’s concerns regarding house prices and mortgage lending it should be noted that the house prices showing the greatest gains are in the lower price ranges and not the top-end markets.
From the above graph I would suggest that the vast majority of Sydney suburbs would be showing their yearly price increases of between 5.00 and 10.00% – which is not a concern. We will only see property stress once the RBA starts moving up the cash rate.
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Budget week is all about huff and puff

<html><body>
As we approach the federal budget, once again we have to endure another round of economic nonsense as the Treasurer tries to convince ordinary Australians that the country is running out of money – facing a ‘budget crisis’.
So ingrained is this message, that few question it.
Instead, <a href="https://www.3aw.com.au/blogs/3aw-drive-blog-with-tom-elliott/my-fivepoint-plan-to-fix-australias-budget/20131211-2z5mw" target="_blank">talk radio</a> is flooded with callers outraged at the ‘debt burden’ they imagine will be passed onto their children. A lifetime of work and servitude lay ahead – not only charged with the responsibility of paying down their own debt – but the government’s debt as well!
For an administration that wants to retain leadership through blaming the last government for the ‘mess’ they’ve reputedly left us in, it’s a convenient message to sell.
‘Fiscal responsibility’ is the catch term of the day, cuts to health services, education, welfare, job seekers allowance, wages, and proposed back to work assistance for those laid off  from the car industry - you name it, it’s on the table. 
Everything that is, except the golden egg of speculative windfall gains that can be gleaned from the increasing value of land.
In countries such as <a href="https://catherinecashmore.com.au/wp/?p=400" target="_blank">Germany</a>, they have historically managed to divert speculation away from residential real estate, with the focus being on productivity instead. Here we’re all subject to an economy built on the retirement ‘wealth egg’ of land – our personal economic leverage for all lifestyle and business needs.
It used to be called Monopoly. Today its termed - 'Getting onto the property ladder'. 
The rules of the game are simple.  The player uses as much debt as they can borrow - to buy and hold as much as they can – and those who got in at the beginning of the lending boom, securing the best plots available, win the game.
In relative terms, the ordinary home owner doesn't advantage much, but what else can they do? Retire still renting? Or become a contestant and hope their house yields enough appreciation to support them when they retire.  (But not so much that their children can't get a foot onto the first rung of course, and leave home before the age of 40.)  Our lives are therefore spent working to pay off a mortgage - or two. (That is, unless you're an unlucky tenant who doesn’t have the funds to buy, in which case you play a game called The Rental Trap.) 
The question we ask however is: at what expense? – Or perhaps at whose expense?
As demonstrated by a recent <a href="https://hia.com.au/~/media/HIA%20Website/Files/Media%20Centre/Media%20Releases/2014/national/Residential%20Land%20Market%20Pressures%20Continue%20to%20Mount.ashx" target="_blank">HIA report</a> – land values continue to skyrocket – with the weighted median across all capitals during the final quarter of December 2013, rising to the:
“Highest level on record… a 22.3% increase on the final quarter of 2012.”
 <img src="/images/2014/05/12/cashmore%20may%2012%20one.png" alt="">
Or perhaps it can be better illustrated on a graph <a href="https://www.newgeography.com/content/004261-urban-containment-land-price-up-5-times-income-smaller" target="_blank">Wendell Cox</a> (author of the <a href="https://www.demographia.com/dhi.pdf" target="_blank">Annual Demographica Housing Affordability Survey</a>) constructed which cuts through the usual measures used to convince readers that “housing has never been more affordable”, with overwhelming focus on mortgage serviceability rates alone.
Instead, it demonstrates the speculative nature shaping the property cycle, which affects not only established house prices, but building activity as lot sizes reduce, whilst land price per square meter, outpaces income growth considerably.
  <img src="/images/2014/05/12/cashmore-may-12-two.jpg" alt="">
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/who-is-really-benefiting-from-the-property-cycle-and-at-what-cost">The smoke screen debates on affordability and scrapping negative gearing</a>, are just that, smoke screens.  Something that was subsequently confirmed upon release of the government's Commission of Audit, which ruled out any consideration of a change to housing policy – better to tax income instead – easier for the top 10% to avoid it, whilst low to middle income earners suffer the shortfall.
Importantly, the Commission of Audit’s terms of reference was to concentrate on direct government expenditure - such as grants and transfer payments rather than tax expenditure - rebates, exemptions and so forth (such as negative gearing, capital gains).
We all have to shoulder the burden, tighten belts, work harder – pensioners included!
‘All’ that is, except those imposing the rules – whose entitlements are immune from any fiscal responsibility.  
Yes – the members of our federal government - the issuers of our monetary supply, offset through taxing those who do have to earn dollars before they can spend it – whilst our government earns nothing – but is rather elected, and charged, to manage the budget in the best interests of its working population to promote economic growth – for which education, health, back to work initiatives and so forth, are vital pillars.
There is no evidence and no economic wisdom that indicates running a surplus under current conditions is good for the economy, especially if that surplus is to be achieved through the measures suggested. 
Article continues on next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
The Henry Tax review set out a framework that would move us to good model of economic management - a well managed deficit in order to achieve this is better than a running for a surplus at any cost - harming productivity in the process - as well as exacerbating private debt - which is high by any measure.
Something, <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D0iFiUfDqSw" target="_blank">Steve Keen</a> does an excellent job of demonstrating in a recent lecture given in Sydney, in which he shows the inevitable consequence to GDP should our government attempt to presently do so.
Economic orthodoxy, which stubbornly insists austerity measures to pay down government debt, should take precedence whilst imposing onerous taxes on its working population, are lessons that should have been learnt following the Great Depression in the 1930s.
There is nothing new about this – indeed, Australia’s oldest PhD at 93  - Dr Elisabeth Kirkby - has just written a 100,000 word thesis on it. And whilst valuable lessons reaped from the grains of history are ignored, the patterns that led to our greatest economic disasters are repeated.
What all demonstrate is, when the government tightens its belt, for no other reason than a vain attempt to spruik a surplus, it has the unwonted effect of withdrawing money from the economy – leaving the private sector (the working class population) to pick up the slack.
Therefore “repairing the [government] budget” with the claim it’s putting Australia “on the right track” – is not putting the fate of Australians on the right track.
It is the government’s responsibility to manage the monetary system for the needs of its population (whether surplus or deficit) - spending enough money into the economy to keep employment and productivity boosted, which by design, reduces pressure on the welfare state.  
Yet it chooses instead to penalise productivity and ignore tax expenditures such as the capital gains exemption on owner occupied housing or scaling back negative gearing.
In this respect, it is economically irresponsible to have a growing deficit offset by tax receipts that reward speculation and by consequence, widen the wealth gap between rich and poor.  Ironically, the very gap the tax and transfer system is supposed to narrow.
In other words, we are not burdening our children with debt – we are burdening them poor economic management.
As austerity measures bite and the retirement age increases, the majority of Australian’s will be working longer and harder – and whilst the government pays down its reputed debt burden – private debt levels will continue to increase as families borrow to afford the basic necessities they need, most likely leveraged against their own homes.
Notwithstanding, most of our debt, is bank created debt – arguably, a far greater concern than government debt.
For those that need a reminder – as demonstrated in the latest <a href="https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0main+features202014" target="_blank">ABS social trends report</a> – total household debt was $1.8 trillion as at the end of 2013 - higher than it has been at any other time over the past 25 years.
<img src="/images/2014/05/12/cashmore-may-12-three.jpg" alt=""> 
Real Household Debt Per Person, Source: ABS
Low interest rates aside - $1.8 trillion is a hefty figure.
To put it in some kind of context – a trillion, is a thousand billion. 
The sun is set to burn out in approximately 5 billion years. A trillion is so large; it’s almost meaningless in real terms.
Total government debt is around $542 billion (as at March 2014 - <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/" target="_blank">RBA</a>) – that’s about 35% of GDP.
In contrast, our household debt to GDP ratio is estimated to be around 97% (as at December 2013 - <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/" style="line-height: 1.3em;">RBA</a>) - assisted by low interest rates and an array of financial products to ‘woo’ new borrowers into the property market (such as shared equity schemes, interest only loans, redraw facilities, offset accounts and so forth). 
Notwithstanding – the increase in bank created debt is a far greater issue than \government debt.
Therefore instead of our current leaders asking Australian’s what they can do to assist government debt. We should be asking the government what it will do to assist private debt. Particularly as we move forward over the next 12 months or so, and the lending cycle turns.
Capitalism?
Of course, this problem is not unique to Australia.  Thomas Piketty’s book <a href="https://www.amazon.com/Capital-Twenty-First-Century-Thomas-Piketty/dp/067443000X">Capital in the 21st Century</a> has just come out to great acclaim, choc full of statistics to demonstrate how income earners – the vast body of productive workers, who prop up the local economy through the taxes they pay and products they produce - are the losers, compared to those who hold stores of unproductive wealth. 
The book focuses on the ‘1%-ers’– advanced through gifts of inheritance – those who hold the vast majority of assets; controllers of the stock and bond markets - collecting their economic rent by way of hording property, and effectively, buying protection through lobbying seats of power.
It’s an age old game and in a world where gaining political leadership is only possible with vast sums of advertising dollars, lobbying is crystallised into the system.
We’re currently seeing this with the <a href="https://www.3cr.org.au/economists/podcast/renegade-economists-07052014" target="_blank">ICAC investigation</a> as it uncovers a web of alleged political corruption, with illegal donations from property developers and other sources, funnelled into a Liberal Party <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/nsw/icac-to-be-suspended-as-mike-gallacher-investigated-for-serious-electoral-funding-irregularities-20140506-zr59n#ixzz30xGqICRV">slush fund</a>.
Meanwhile, Clive Palmer has been accused of “<a href="https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/palmer-spending-like-a-drunken-sailor-on-poll/story-fn59niix-1226871364428" target="_blank">spending money like a drunken sailor</a>” to secure a third seat in Senate for his PUP party.
Palmer reportedly entered the leadership battle due to “poor policy decisions” by the Gillard government – the carbon tax in particular being highlighted, which promised to negatively impact his core business.
However, his other policy evaluations leave much to be desired.
For example, Palmer’s <a href="https://palmerunited.com/national-policy/" target="_blank">housing affordability</a> plan, is to make home loans tax deductable for the first $10,000 – a move which will unquestionably push land prices higher, as future buyers factor the savings into their budget and adjust price expectations accordingly.
But then, considering Mr Palmer’s significant land holdings, which are said to <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Palmer" target="_blank">include</a>;
<ul>
<li>“A six bedroom, 11 bathroom, 22 car garage property in Queensland - along with;</li>
<li>An array of golf courses. As well as;</li>
<li>“Family and associates” owning a total of “11 homes in the Sovereign Islands” on the banks of the Southport Broadwater - as well as;</li>
<li>“Other known properties at Broadbeach Waters on the Gold Coast, Fig Tree Pocket in Brisbane, Jandowae on the Darling Downs, Queensland, and Port Douglas” and notwithstanding;</li>
<li>“An undisclosed number of properties held in trust for their daughter.”</li>
</ul>
I suspect lowering land values, may not be top of mind.
The wealth tax solutions Piketty proposes to stop the gap widening fail not only by the confused definition of what one would consider wealth (a Rembrandt painting, or luxury yacht for example?), but also that of capital.
In modern terminology, capital is used for anything that yields a profit – which under our current system includes land. However, in classical terms, capital is a factor of production - a depreciating asset and one, which can be reproduced.
In a society built on the foundation of free markets, factors of production flourish under competition. If one widget costs too much, an entrepreneur will find an innovative way to produce the same widget at a cheaper price. 
It’s called capitalism.
Land however is not a factor of production. It can’t be moved or reproduced and it’s limited in supply. Therefore the revenue stream generated from the unimproved portion alone is due to its locational advantage, and little else.
The free market activities in a capitalist society, cause land values to increase – and considering this is through no act of individual exertion on the vendor’s side, but rather the collective efforts of the community, it makes sense that most consider owning a well located plot of land, better than both money in the bank and the wages they have to earn.
This is why increasing charges on the revenue stream ensuing from the locational value of land, and recycling it back into the community - (which is where it came from, and where it belongs) – by way of a tax shift offproductivity (wages) and onto our valuable and limited natural resources - was termed the ‘least bad tax’ by the capitalists <a href="https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/11/land-tax-must-kill-negative-gearing-stamp-duty/" target="_blank">Milton Friedman and Winston Churchill</a> – to name but a few. 
Rising land values harm capitalism, they increase the rent for small business owners, always benefitting the landlord but never benefitting the wage earner. Furthermore, rising land values force young people out of the market, whilst making those in the market wealthy – and widening the gap between rich and poor.
When land prices inflate, jobs are lost as more revenue is taken away from productivity and soaked into the ground.  
It’s not called capitalism; it’s called capitalising - taking advantage of community created revenue - the total of which is pocketed by the land owner.
This is why land prices are so high and vested interests of policy makers <a href="https://catherinecashmore.com.au/wp/?p=503" target="_blank">always act</a> to push them higher.
The great man Buckminster Fuller – architect, systems theorist, author, designer, inventor, and futurist – once said:
“You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.” (H/T author of soon to be published book Land by <a href="https://medium.com/p/18066c10ac50" target="_blank">Martin Adams</a>)
We live in a democracy, therefore any change to the status quo needs to come from the ground up – we will never get it from the top down.
The Henry tax review set out recommendations for transitioning our economy based on the ideas penned above. 
 How we get there is worthy of debate – however thankfully, due to the internet and a new age of enlightened priced out folk, we can start that debate in 2016/17 by using our own preference and economic wisdom to vote a government which acts to widen the rich/poor divide out.  By which time there may be better options to vote in.   
</body></html>

catherinecashmore-6LXia3pPQj

Economic nonsense and the consequences for future generations

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The Victorian government has decided to reduce payroll tax by 0.05%, from 4.9% to 4.85%. The decision comes as the Commonwealth government contemplates an increase in income tax via a deficit levy.
But if the objective is to increase national productivity to meet growing expectations for government services, as well as private consumption, logic would shift the tax burden away from income tax and increase payroll tax. This approach might even provide the basis for more effective and transparent commonwealth-state financial arrangements.
Stand-alone taxes are not the answer
A comprehensive income tax system would include tax on wages, but also on capital income, where capital income is the return on accumulated savings, such as superannuation earnings.
Commonwealth taxation is reasonably comprehensive for wages, with fringe benefits concessions and tax breaks for superannuation for those on middle and high incomes.
In the case of capital income, there are many concessions, including the exemption of income earned on savings invested in owner-occupied homes, the half rate on capital gains and the low flat rate on superannuation fund earnings; interest and dividends face no concessions. A progressive rate schedule is applied to taxable income.
By contrast, a comprehensive payroll tax would fall on all labour remuneration, but not on capital income.
In Australia, the states impose payroll tax on a base that covers about half of all salaries. The largest concession is the exemption of small businesses, with the definition of small business varying across the states (and territories). There are exemptions also for other governments and charities. Above the threshold, a flat marginal tax rate is applied, again with different rates in different states.
Measuring the real impacts of tax
The ultimate outcome of income tax, and especially of payroll tax, is often misunderstood. It is generally accepted that most of the effect, if not all, of the income tax is borne by households as lower disposable income to buy things; with the tax revenue used to fund government goods and services. But in reality, most of the income tax on labour income is first paid by employers as a PAYG deduction from salaries.
And the economic impact of payroll tax should also be on households as lower take-home pay. Initially, businesses pay the payroll tax bill to government, and with a jump in labour costs some are forced to reduce the number of people they employ, boosting unemployment.
The increase in unemployment induces a slower rate of increase in market wages in order for the labour market to return to a new near full employment equilibrium. That is, in the longer run, households bear payroll tax as a lower market wage and take-home pay.
Further, consider the current payroll tax with its exemption on the half of employees working in small businesses. While large businesses write the payroll tax cheque, ultimately the tax is passed on as lower market wages and take-home pay for employees of both small businesses and large businesses.
At the same time, the selective payroll tax on large businesses distorts the employment mix away from large to small businesses with a loss of national productivity.
Replacing the current payroll tax, with its small business exemption, with a comprehensive base and lower flat rate payroll tax would also result in lower market wages for all employees. But, the distortions of the current system to the mix of big and small businesses would be removed, resulting in a net increase in national productivity.
The case for a shift from income tax to payroll tax
Shifting the tax burden away from income tax and onto a comprehensive payroll or consumption tax would reduce the effective tax burden on capital income, leading to an increase in aggregate investment and a more productive mix of different investment and saving options with a final economic impact on higher real wages and household income.
Since the arrival of Governor Phillip, Australia has been a net importer of foreign capital to meet its investment needs. Foreign investors, with options to place their savings in many other countries, require at least an alternative world return on the Australian investment after Australian tax.
A lower Australian tax on capital income, for example a lower income or corporate tax rate, means some marginal Australian investments with a lower pre-tax return become worthwhile. In time, the increased investment means a larger stock of capital and technology per Australian worker, feeding into higher labour productivity and market wages.
Finally, a broader base payroll tax, and possibly also a higher payroll tax rate, along with a reformed land tax, offers a desirable tax reform package to increase the tax revenue of the states.
John Freebairn is a professor at the Department of Economics at University of Melbourne.
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

jake-cSmGT7VXVf

Australia’s tax system is half-baked and a deficit levy won’t help

<html><body>
The Barnett government has increased land tax by 10% across the board amidst slowing revenue growth.
As the state’s property market softens along with its labour market, the government has turned to land tax to offset the state’s declining revenues. The increase in land taxes is forecast to raise an additional $72 million in 2014-15 and $334 million over the four years to 2017-18. Land tax is expected to bring in a total of $752 million for the state this year, and is estimated to bring $1.01 billion in revenue in 2017-18.
In West Australia, land tax is payable on properties with unimproved land values over $300,000. According to the government, the majority of West Australian property owners will be unaffected by the land tax changes due to a range of exemptions. Approximately 80% of those affected, who hold land with an unimproved value of up to $1 million, will experience a tax increase of up to $70 per year.
After the tax increase, West Australian property owners who are ineligible for exemptions will pay annual land tax ranging from $110 for properties with an unimproved land value of $400,000 to $263,000 for unimproved land value of $15 million. Land tax increased by 12.5% in the 2013 budget.
The 2014 budget saw a big infrastructure spend in Perth's north, with $3 billion to go towards the area. Treasurer Mike Nahan, who said the region was one of Perth's fastest growing areas, committed $641.3 million in public transport and road infrastructure spending to the region.
Over four years, $320 million will be spent on extending the Mitchell Freeway from Burns Beach Road to Hester Avenue. The extension is intended to relieve traffic from Clarkson, Butler and Jindalee, which are cited by the government as growth areas. With residential developments planned for the northern region, a further $32.9 million over the next two years will go towards extending the northern suburbs rail line to Butler. A section of the Reid Highway will be turned into dual carriageways, costing $43 million.
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Western Australia’s 2014 budget: 10% land tax hike

<html><body>
The property market is displaying all the typical signs of a slowdown, according to Propell National Valuers.
Citing increasing unemployment levels and federal budget expectations, national research manager Linda Phillips says that housing demand is likely to drop.
“Forget the past. It is now May and the market faces headwinds in the form of the traditionally slower winter months, the painful federal government budget and rising unemployment”, said Phillips.
“Any impetus from the declining interest rates of last year has now worked through the market. The federal budget is likely to impact badly on consumer confidence and strip demand from the market which may need a further lowering of interest rates to restore spending.”
This is contrary to the expectations of many high profile economists and commentators, many of <a href="/expert-insights/finance/interest-rate-stays-on-hold-did-our-experts-get-it-right">whom predict that interest rates</a> are <a href="/expert-insights/finance/rba-expected-to-keep-rates-on-hold-for-now-hsbc">likely to rise</a> before the end of the year. 
According to Propell, increasing property listings this month will be “trading in the face of negative headlines about what the federal budget might include,” and, after May 13, adjusting to the announced budget.
Propell National Valuers itself notes that it was “first to highlight the risk of the abolition of negative gearing in the budget”, but that it appears now that “the housing market itself will not be the subject of direct attacks in the budget.”
However, the company’s researchers do not rule out the possibility of other housing related adjustments in the federal budget. But the greatest budgetary impact on the housing sector will come from the expected reduction in government spending, tax increases and employment levels, according to Propell. The property research firm expects that tightening measures will increase unemployment through the reduction of the public sector and soften consumption, leading to a decrease in real estate demand. It predicts that some states will see median price reductions through the winter months. 
</body></html>

Housing boom coming to an end: Propell

<html><body>
In 2007, as the WA's extraordinary property boom reached its peak, then Treasurer Eric Ripper lifted the stamp duty threshold for first home buyers to $500,000.
As the median house price jumped, housing affordability became more difficult and the entry costs to first home buyers in particular became a real impediment. Chief among those costs was several thousand dollars in stamp duty, given that first time buyers were then typically purchasing dwellings at around $300,000.
That policy move by the Carpenter government to effectively abolish stamp duty for the majority of first home buyers has proved over intervening years to be a tremendous success. They have flourished in WA, helped along by low interest rates, the first home buyers grant, plenty of jobs and a robust state economy. In recent years first time buyers often reached more than 30% of the overall market, dwarfing the experience on the east coast.
First home buyer activity in particular has been very strong but is now trending downwards at a worrying rate. Changing policy settings at this time would be very unhelpful and a false economy.
Governments tend to underestimate the importance of first home buyers to the property market and economy in general. Not only do first home buyers take stock out of the market, they facilitate the property seller to trade-up, generating additional revenue from stamp duty as well as other business activity.
The new-home building markets also benefit as economic activity is increased through growth in supply chain business. WA ought not make the same mistake as NSW, which axed the first home buyer duty concession, or Victoria where first home buyer grants were greatly reduced. The clear evidence from these states is that first home buyer activity subsequently collapsed and has not recovered.
While REIWA understands the need for government to fund services and supply infrastructure, my concern is for the overall health and sustainability of the WA housing market at a precarious time. Current REIWA data supported by Landgate figures indicates a market downturn is likely for the second half of 2014.
Evidence from the March quarter shows a drop in sales numbers of around 6% compared to the same quarter in 2013. Listings for sale have risen to the highest level since December 2012 and rental listings are at a seven year high, with the vacancy rate now over 4% for the first time since 2010. Investors are scarce and first home buyers are dropping away. It’s time to recognise that stamp duty on property as a means to raise revenue is clumsy, inefficient and outdated.
Typical stamp duty on a median priced home in Perth is now $20,000. Bracket creep alone has pushed this up by $4,280 over the last five years.
REIWA calls on the government to have a serious look at broadening the land tax base to all property owners with the view to abolishing stamp duty altogether.
The benefit to government is steady, predictable revenue income based on land ownership, rather than unpredictable and volatile revenue income based on sales activity. The benefit to property owners is the simplicity of a modest, annual land tax as opposed to ‘bill shock’, when hit with a huge stamp duty tax in the tens of thousands when they transact.
In some cases stamp duty is so prohibitive to potential buyers that they stay put, jamming the market and not allowing established homes to flow into the first home buyer pool. A broad-based land tax was proposed by the Henry Tax Review and has merit. It has since been adopted by the ACT, which will phase it in over 20 years so it does not disrupt the market and will effectively be revenue neutral.
It’s time for a mature discussion around this proposal with the aim of creating a long-term plan for a better system of property taxes. One that’s not at the mercy of an anxious treasurer every financial year.
</body></html>

dairey-MVZf5ZguQC

Land tax for all should replace stamp duty for some

<html><body>
Property Observer <a href="/news/reia-urges-government-to-allow-fhbs-to-dip-into-superannuation-for-a-home">previously reported about the REIA's proposals for the 2014/2015 federal budget</a>.
Here are the 10 wishes they look to see fulfilled next week.
The REIA’s 10-item pre-budget submission wishlist:
<ol>
<li>Ensure the availability of reliable data on housing demand and supply to formulate appropriate policies and to monitor their effectiveness. 
</li>
<li>All states and territories uphold the initial intent of the Intergovernmental Agreement in Federal Financial Relations Schedule A, that assistance to first home buyers will be “uniform” and that “an eligible home will be new or established”. 
</li>
<li>Review the amount of the First Home Owner Grant annually to maintain relativity with house price movements. 
</li>
<li>Allow first home buyers access to their superannuation for the purchase of a home. 
</li>
<li>Retention of current arrangements for negative gearing of property investments. 
</li>
<li>No increase in capital gains tax on property investments. 
</li>
<li>Abolish stamp duty on property transactions in favour of an efficient source of revenue for states and territories. 
</li>
<li>Improve the supply of housing for social housing tenants transitioning to private rental by utilising private investment. 
</li>
<li>Monitor Housing Affordability Fund (HAF) and National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS) to observe its effects on housing supply and to conduct a review which  considers additional measures to bridge the demand-supply imbalance. 
</li>
<li>Ensure the Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) funding is adequate to ensure nationally approved quality standards are met for vocational education and training. It is also imperative that outcomes be assessed by government around how well the Authority has ensured the integrity of the VET sector.</li>
</ol>
Source: REIA Budget submission. You can <a href="https://reia.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/REIA-Pre-Budget-Submission-2014-15.pdf" target="_blank">read it in its entirety here</a>.
</body></html>

The REIA's 10 point wishlist for the federal budget

<html><body>
The factor overlooked in the “debate” about tax benefits for property buyers is that the amount taken from real estate by government is considerably more than the amount given back.
Real estate is the cash cow of choice for all three levels of government – including through stamp duty, land tax, capital gains tax, rates and infrastructure charges.
The appeal for governments of taxing real estate transactions and ownership is so great that we’ve just seen a government with a multi-billion dollar budget surplus (thanks to revenue from a rising real estate market) introduce a new tax on real estate construction to help fund its attempt to buy the upcoming state election.
The Victoria state government is able to spend big in an election year thanks to real estate and the increased tax take via stamp duty on increased sales levels and land tax helped by rising property values.
<blockquote>
Abolishing negative gearing would ultimately cost government more than it saves, while resulting in a dramatic escalation in residential rents, especially in the major cities.
</blockquote>
The amount of stamp duty ripped out of each real estate transaction by state governments is so obscene ($27,000 on the average purchase in Sydney) that it’s a wonder citizens aren’t marching in the street – particularly as we were told the introduction of a GST would result in the elimination of stamp duty.
But governments never eliminate existing taxes. They only introduce new ones – even governments like that of Tony Abbott who promised repeatedly before the federal election he would never do so.
Land tax is an example of an impost that was introduced for a specific purpose and then became entrenched as a convenient revenue source. It was introduced in the nineteenth century specifically to break up large land holdings, which were considered a problem at the time, and remains a blight on the property landscape 130 years later.
So we can be sure that the new tax in Victoria – which has started life as a tax on the construction of buildings costing more than $1 million to fund a new bureaucracy, the Metropolitan Planning Authority – will still be around a century from now, but with much broader application that in 2014.
The Property Council of Australia’s executive director in Victoria, Jennifer Cunich, says: “A government projecting multi-billion dollar surpluses shouldn’t be introducing new property taxes.”
Well of course they shouldn’t, but they can’t help themselves. It’s like telling a rodent that’s been raiding your kitchen every night that it can’t eat the chocolate mud cake you left sitting on the bench.
The total tax take from real estate is around $33 billion per year. The cost to the federal budget from negative gearing is around $4 billion a year.
Abolishing negative gearing would ultimately cost government more than it saves, while resulting in a dramatic escalation in residential rents, especially in the major cities. There would only be losers from such a move.
You can contact Terry via  <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email</a> or on <a href="https://www.twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.
</body></html>

Budget

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Budget

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News