The Victorian Government has secured the passage of the Building Legislation and Treasury Legislation (Tax Relief) Amendment Bill 2026, introducing a suite of reforms aimed at improving consumer protection and confidence in the apartment market.

Resilience Insurance, Australia’s leading Latent Defects Insurance (LDI) provider, has welcomed the move.

The LDI elements of the Bill passed with bipartisan support and now moves to the Legislative Council where debate and passage are expected later this month. It represents a significant milestone in the national shift toward stronger, longer-term protection for apartment buyers.&nbsp;

The reform would deliver practical benefits across the housing system. Apartment owners will have stronger protection if major defects emerge, developers and builders will have a clearer quality framework to work within, and the State will reduce the risk of serious building failures becoming a long-term financial and social burden for households, communities and government.&nbsp;

LDI helps support apartment delivery while providing stronger protection for buyers and encouraging better construction outcomes.&nbsp;

Resilience LDI provides apartment owners with 10 years of insurance-backed cover for major structural defects from completion, with direct claim access to the insurer. This means owners are not required to first pursue developers or builders through costly legal action before accessing protection.&nbsp;

Resilience Insurance has been operating in Australia since 2022 and has already insured hundreds of development projects covering many thousands of apartments across Australia.&nbsp;

At approximately 1.8 per cent of build cost, it is a cost-competitive alternative to the traditional two per cent Strata Bond, bond while delivering significantly broader and longer protection.&nbsp;

“The Victorian Lower House vote shows that reforms like this succeed when they are practical, evidence-based and supported by industry," says Corey Nugent, CEO of Resilience Insurance.

"Victoria is moving quickly on a reform that will make a real difference for apartment buyers, while supporting better building outcomes and greater confidence in apartment delivery.

“This is step one. We look forward to the Bill completing its passage through the Legislative Council and to working with government and industry to implement the framework effectively.”&nbsp;

Fast Facts: What is Resilience LDI?&nbsp;

<ul>
	<li>Resilience Latent Defects Insurance (LDI): Covers major structural defects for 10 years from completion.&nbsp;</li>
	<li>Consumer-first: Direct claim access, no need for lengthy legal action.&nbsp;</li>
	<li>Cost advantage: At approximately 1.8% of build cost, LDI is typically priced below the traditional 2% Strata Bond while offering broader protection.&nbsp;</li>
	<li>Market leader: Resilience Insurance is the first approved LDI provider in NSW.</li>
</ul>

The Building Legislation and Treasury Legislation (Tax Relief) Amendment Bill 2026 has passed the Victorian Lower House, putting Victoria on track to become the first state to legislate an industry workable LDI framework as a formal alternative to the Strata Building bond. 

Joel Robinson

10-year Latent Defects Insurance for new apartment buyers set to land in Victoria

Just a few months after acquiring a prime Broadbeach site on the corner of First Avenue and Surf Parade, family-run developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/raptis">Raptis</a> has filed fresh plans for a new apartment development.

Raptis is seeking to deliver a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/17-19-first-avenue-broadbeach-qld-4217">29-storey tower with 73 apartments</a> on the 818 sqm site. It will be the developer's seventh project in the suburb, as they are approaching completion of The Sterling on George Avenue.

There will be a pool, barbecue and outdoor dining area, residents lounge and dining, sauna and steam room, gym, and a Yoga and Pilates studio.

<img alt="Raptis" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="b554da3f-7344-49aa-b1c9-44cf459af0d7" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-05%20at%2010.41.45%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=zzjWu1iO1wnuYv4EV4fyOyf5nSXjGYut" />

Raptis Joint Managing Director, Evan Raptis, says they remain&nbsp;committed to developing quality infill sites across the Gold Coast in the lead-up to the 2032 Brisbane Olympics.

"This project continues our long track record of delivery in Broadbeach, and we look forward to bringing another premium development to this thriving precinct."

The announcement follows strong delivery momentum for Raptis, with The Sterling Broadbeach nearing completion and construction well underway on the final stage of the Waterpoint community adjacent to Harbour Town. The developer's continued investment in the Gold Coast reflects confidence in the region's apartment market fundamentals, underpinned by sustained Southeast Queensland population growth.&nbsp;

The outlook for the region is further bolstered by infrastructure investment tied to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic Games, which is expected to drive continued economic and population growth across the SEQ corridor.&nbsp;

Subject to a favourable response from Gold Coast City Council, construction on the new First Avenue tower is targeted to commence before the end of 2026.&nbsp;

Read more:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/it-s-all-in-the-family-four-decades-later-raptis-continues-to-shape-the-gold-coast-skyline">It’s all in the family: Four decades later, Raptis continues to shape the Gold Coast skyline</a>

Read more: <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/raptis-secures-prime-surf-parade-site-for-next-broadbeach-apartment-development">Raptis secures prime Surf Parade site for next Broadbeach apartment development</a> 
&nbsp;

Gold Coast developer brings seventh Broadbeach project to market, targeting construction commencement before year end

First look: Raptis lodges plans for new 29-storey Broadbeach tower 

Brisbane development veteran Kevin Seymour's Seymour Group is set to deepen its presence on one of Brisbane's most tightly held riverfront addresses, lodging revised plans for a luxury apartment development on Oxlade, just a few doors down from The Oxlade, which it completed in 2024.

The <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/70-72-oxlade-drive-new-farm-qld-4005">new project at 70-72 Oxlade Drive</a>, directly north of The Oxlade, will have 27 apartments across a seven-storey building&nbsp;overlooking the Brisbane River and Merthyr Park. It's a revision from a 2021-approved design.

Designed by bureau^proberts, the project has evolved from the previously approved 26-apartment scheme, introducing an additional penthouse level while maintaining a low-density, boutique character. The development will comprise 26 three-bedroom apartments and a single four-bedroom penthouse, supported by two basement levels with 86 car spaces and 34 bicycle spaces.

The architectural response is centred around two distinct building forms separated by a landscaped open-air atrium.&nbsp;"This dual composition captures and embraces Brisbane’s subtropical environment whilst breaking down built form and scale," the submission to the Brisbane City Council noted.

<img alt="First look: Seymour Group returns to Oxlade Drive with revised riverfront apartment plans in New Farm" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="c12d84d0-bc11-4067-b46f-5bd2d786a34d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/new%20farm%20landscape.png?VersionId=YEPc2k5CAdh6aAPlu4uVpgZadh4MEfRd" />

A defining feature of the design is a deep landscaped void running through the centre of the building, creating what bureau^proberts describes as a "natural ravine" that enhances airflow, daylight penetration and resident amenity. The design report notes that the separation of the two building volumes is intended to maximise natural light, cross-ventilation and outlook while strengthening connections to the surrounding riverfront setting.

Curved balcony edges, integrated planting and extensive landscaping throughout the façade reinforce the subtropical design approach. The building's façade is softened by elevated gardens and planter beds, creating a green edge that complements the established landscape character of Oxlade Drive and neighbouring Merthyr Park.

New Farm has become one of Brisbane's most sought-after suburbs for developers delivering premium downsizer-focused apartments.

GRAYA has been particularly active in the precinct, completing both Chalk and York in recent years, while construction of Moray House, being delivered for Spyre, is now nearing completion. Architect-turned-developer Joe Adsett recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/arcilla-new-farm-by-joe-adsett-28-maxwell-street-new-farm-qld-4005">Arcilla on Maxwell Street</a>, an exclusive collection of just nine apartments.

First look: Seymour Group returns to New Farm's Oxlade Drive with riverfront apartment plans

A new residential tower will be the first piece of a broader mixed-use precinct set to reshape a prominent Newcastle West site, with local developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gwh">GWH</a> bringing its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/cambridge-quarter-newcastle-west-12-denison-street-newcastle-west-nsw-2302">Cambridge Quarter</a> vision to market.

The first release, Tempo, will introduce 87 apartments across a 24-storey tower, marking Stage 1 of the residential component of a larger urban regeneration project planned for the western end of Newcastle's city centre, encompassing the former Cambridge Hotel site.

Positioned on Denison Street, Tempo has been designed as the inaugural building within Cambridge Quarter, a precinct that will ultimately combine apartments, retail activation and revitalised public spaces including the revamping of the Cambridge Hotel.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135876 project_image_fid=368853]

The tower will comprise a mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments, including layouts with multipurpose rooms, catering to a broad cross-section of owner-occupiers. Apartment sizes range from around 60 sqm to 192 sqm, with a number of residences oriented to capture views across Newcastle Harbour, the city skyline and coastline.

GWH has emphasised liveability in the design, with open-plan layouts extending to generous balconies and terraces. Residents will have a choice of two interior palettes, while specifications include engineered stone benchtops, SMEG appliances, full-height bathroom tiling and secure building access. Premium upgrade packages will also be available.

Multiple rooftop resident retreats will provide communal outdoor space overlooking the harbour and city, offering an elevated amenity layer above the activity of the precinct below.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135876 project_image_fid=368851]

The broader Cambridge Quarter vision extends beyond the residential tower itself. Ground-level retail activation and landscaped public areas are planned throughout the precinct, creating a walkable neighbourhood environment connected to the surrounding renewal of Newcastle West. The Cambridge Hotel is also earmarked for future redevelopment into a family-friendly hospitality venue integrated with the new precinct.

The project is strategically positioned within walking distance of Newcastle Interchange, providing access to light rail, regional rail services and direct connections to Sydney. Residents will also be close to Honeysuckle, Newcastle Harbour and the city's beaches and coastal walkways.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135876 project_image_fid=368852]

For GWH, Cambridge Quarter represents one of its most significant Newcastle developments to date. The locally based developer, which has operated in the Hunter region since 1995, describes the project as a new chapter in the ongoing transformation of Newcastle West.

GWH Executive Director Jonathan Craig said the project had been shaped by a focus on creating lasting community connections.

"We take pride in creating places that last. Spaces where people feel connected, comfortable and a genuine sense of belonging," Craig said.

"Cambridge Quarter is something we are truly proud of, a place shaped by local knowledge, built with care and designed to be part of Newcastle's next chapter."

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135876]

GWH unveils first release at landmark Cambridge Quarter precinct in Newcastle West

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/ss-projects">S&amp;S Projects</a>,&nbsp;Rainbow Bay's busiest developer,&nbsp;has officially lodged plans for the largest development in its booming local portfolio, seeking approval for a further 88 apartments on Boundary Street.

The proposal&nbsp;at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/209-213-boundary-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">209–213 Boundary Street, Coolangatta</a>,&nbsp;marks the next chapter in the developer's transformation of the southern Gold Coast beachside precinct. It will be its fifth in the area, having already delivered Flow, Awaken and Esprit, while construction continues on the 38-apartment Radia. The new project would rise 57 metres above a consolidated 1,518 sqm site, on the same street as Radia and Esprit.

&nbsp;

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cottee-parker-architects">Cottee Parker</a>, the proposed development comprises 88 two and three-bedroom apartments across a contemporary podium-and-tower form that integrates extensive landscaping from street level through to the rooftop.

The tower would be delivered above a basement and multi-level podium accommodating resident and visitor parking, with the residential component commencing from level three. The design incorporates cascading planting throughout the façade, landscaped podium edges, and deep planting zones along the Boundary Street frontage.

<img alt="First look: S&amp;S Projects lodges plans for 88-apartment wellness tower at Coolangatta's Boundary Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="677e6615-b5c0-4b6c-b4f9-efb14fcde1a6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/ss%20da%20pers.png?VersionId=YOnPKQm7IFXv0M5H326djEpxk80500Hi" />

A key feature of the development is its expansive rooftop wellness and recreation precinct. Plans reveal a resort-style pool deck, gymnasium, sauna, steam room, hot and cold plunge pools, rooftop terraces, barbecue areas and landscaped relaxation spaces positioned to capture views across the southern Gold Coast coastline.

The rooftop wellness focus builds on the vision S&amp;S Projects first outlined when it acquired the site for $20.25 million last year.

"We are taking every advantage to create a truly unique rooftop wellness experience with a natural feel for residents, offering stone features throughout and an underlying theme that emulates a botanical garden," S&amp;S Projects founder and director Paul Gedoun said at the time.

The proposal seeks a 57-metre building height, representing a 50 per cent uplift on the site's mapped 38-metre height limit. Planning documents argue the additional height is consistent with recently approved and emerging towers in the immediate Boundary Street and Rainbow Bay precinct.

Urbis, acting as planning consultant, said the development would provide "88 dwellings, comprising a mix of two and three-bedroom apartments, contributing to housing choice and supply within an established medium to high-rise coastal urban neighbourhood."

The scheme has undergone extensive pre-lodgement consultation with the City of Gold Coast, with the design refined following feedback relating to architectural expression, landscaping, traffic access and podium treatment.

<img alt="S&amp;S" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0a2d70fd-62ac-4b83-97c6-b798fc1243dd" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-06-05%20at%209.16.31%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=yHmghUwKM3IVGpBktQU1mE.0Lpf3WimG" />

The architectural team is led by Brisbane-based Cottee Parker, one of Australia's most active residential design studios, with landscape architecture by Dunn + Moran. The consultant team also includes ADG Engineers, Windtech and Acoustic Works.

S&amp;S Projects has become one of the most influential private developers operating on the southern Gold Coast. Since entering Rainbow Bay in 2022, the company has assembled a portfolio exceeding $1 billion in end value, establishing itself as a key player in the area's evolution into a premium apartment destination. Pezet Matheson will again handle the sales for S&amp;S.

Coolangatta is entering another wave of apartment development, following the delivery of several prominent residential projects in recent years.

John Kearney's Immerse Projects will launch&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/kaiya-kirra-beach-5-haig-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Kaiya on Haig Street</a>&nbsp;soon, meanwhile, Palm Beach-based Sherpa Property Group is preparing to bring its debut Coolangatta development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-viver-87-griffith-street-coolangatta-qld-4225">Flourish Viveré</a>, to market later this year, subject to approvals.

First look: S&S Projects proposes 88-apartment wellness tower at Coolangatta's Boundary Street

Budget

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The Westpac Melbourne Institute Index of Consumer Sentiment rose by 3.9% in November from 97.8 in October to 101.7 in November. 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
This is a cracking result. Apart from the brief surge we saw following last May’s Budget this is the highest print for the Index since January 2014. The Index is now 8.3% higher than in September, immediately preceding the change of leadership in the government. 
It marks only the third month out of the last twenty one that optimists have outnumbered pessimists. 
The increase also comes despite the banks’ decisions to raise mortgage rates for both owner occupiers and investors. It is surprising that such events did not have a negative impact on confidence. It appears that such is the boost to confidence from the recent political events that the impact of the interest rate increases was comfortably contained Most remarkably, the confidence of respondents who hold a mortgage increased by 4.1% – a slightly larger increase than the rise in the overall Index. 
There is evidence to support this observation that the result is the net effect of two strong opposing forces. The components of the index that measure respondents’ assessments of their own finances were down, on average, by 5.7% whereas the components of the index that measure respondents’ expectations for the overall economy increased by an average of 15.0%. 
The assessments of personal finances were presumably linked to the interest rate increases whereas the outlook for the economy was most likely boosted by confidence in the new leadership. 
Following a spectacular 13.7% fall in October the Westpac Melbourne Institute Index of Unemployment Expectations rose by 3.3% in November. Recall that lower readings indicate fewer consumers expect unemployment to rise in the year ahead. The Index remains 10.9% below its September level and continues to signal a much less pessimistic attitude towards the labour market than we have seen for a number of years. 
As discussed there were some significant conflicting movements amongst the components of the Index. The sub-index tracking assessments of ‘family finances compared to a year ago’ fell 2.2% and the sub-index tracking expectations for ‘family finances over the next 12 months’ slumped 9.1%. Those falls were probably in direct response to the increase in mortgage rates. 
On the other hand the sub-index tracking expectations for ‘economic conditions over the next 12 months’ increased 5.8% while that tracking expectations for ‘economic conditions over the next five years’ soared 24.2% to its highest level since September 2013. It is likely that a boost in confidence towards the economic credentials of the new leadership team played an important hand here. 
<a href="/images/2015/12/Screen%20Shot%202015-11-11%20at%2010.40.07%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/12/Screen%20Shot%202015-11-11%20at%2010.40.07%20AM.png" alt="" width="548" height="354">
 
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
In an encouraging sign for retailers, the sub-index tracking views on ‘time to buy a major household item’ lifted 4.8% although it is still 2.2% below its level this time last year. 
Another encouraging sign for the Christmas spending outlook comes with our special question: “Do you expect to spend more; less; or about the same on Christmas gifts compared to last year”. Since we started this question, seven years ago, the average proportion proclaiming ‘more’ has been 12.5%. Today’s survey scored 16.9% whereas ‘less’ registered 29.6% compared to the average of 34.7%. Consumers in NSW were particularly upbeat with more planning to increase than cut Christmas spending compared to a year ago. 
In fact, this survey shows the most positive mix of Christmas spending plans since we began running this special question in 2009 – a very encouraging signal in the lead in to the holiday period. 
Prospects for the housing market remained soft in this survey. The ‘time to buy a dwelling’ index rose slightly in November but the 1.4% gain still leaves the index down 12.5% over the last year and 29% below its most recent peak in 2013. Weakness persists in NSW; Queensland softened markedly; while Victoria held up well. Possibly in response to recent price falls there was a marked boost in confidence in Western Australia. 
There was another sharp fall in house price expectations. The Westpac-Melbourne Institute House Price Expectations Index fell 7.9% to be down 18.7% over the year. The biggest falls this month were in NSW and Queensland with price expectations in Victoria remaining remarkably robust. 
The Reserve Bank board next meets on December 1. Following its November meeting the Bank has adopted a ‘medium’ easing bias with the low inflation environment affording scope to ease if that is deemed necessary. 
However, the Bank currently expects growth in 2016 of 3.0% (above trend) building to 3.5% in 2017. The positive results from this survey will only bolster these confident growth expectations. There is little chance of a rate cut in December.
<div class="page" title="Page 2">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The real issue is whether the Bank will eventually act to cut rates next year – as confidently expected by the market. It is our current view that the growth dynamics of the Australian economy will remain sufficiently supportive through 2016 to ensure steady rates. The lift in spending expectations and confidence around the employment outlook from the survey point in that direction 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<a href="/images/2015/12/Screen%20Shot%202015-11-11%20at%2010.41.46%20AM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/12/Screen%20Shot%202015-11-11%20at%2010.41.46%20AM.png" alt="" width="680" height="218">
 
Bill Evans is chief economist of <a href="https://www.westpac.com.au/" target="_blank">Westpac</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

bevans-rYk9SxEa4r

Political change further boosts consumer sentiment: Bill Evans

<html><body>
No change to NSW first home buyer grants in the state budget could intensify activity before the grant's 1 January 2016 reduction.
The grant for buyers of new homes is scheduled to be reduced from $15,000 to $10,000. 
While recipient numbers are up, first home buyers have been largely absent from the booming Sydney market, hesitant at purchasing new homes. 
Grants for established home purchases for first time ceased three years ago.
But the $5000 reduction could spark a Home World flurry over the next six months. 
The Government budget papers said it was continuing to target its first home owner assistance (grants and transfer duty concessions) to support the purchase or construction of new homes, which is helping increase the supply of new housing in NSW. 
In 2014, the Government provided 7,955 First Home Owner Grants for new homes, a 25% increase on the previous year.
A $15,000 grant is available to first home buyers where the value of the new home purchased does not exceed the First Home Owner Grant Cap of $750,000 for contracts dated on or after 1 July 2014.
The amount of the grant will reduce to $10,000 from 1 January 2016.
There is also a wider duty exemption on new homes valued up to $550,000 and vacant land valued up to $350,000.
A duty concession on new homes valued between $550,000 and $650,000, and vacant land valued between $350,000 and $450,000.
The recent strength in the Sydney property boom was being especially driven by properties <a href="/expert-insights/less-revenue-growth-ahead-but-nsw-state-budget-benefits-from-7-29-billion-stamp-duty-bonanza">valued over $1.2 million, the NSW State Budget revealed</a>, but the housing boom longevity is not being assumed by the NSW Treasury.
NSW land tax revenues are forecast to rise at a faster rate than stamp duty revenues, <a href="/expert-insights/nsw-land-tax-revenue-increases-to-outdo-stamp-duty-revenue-growth">according to the NSW state budget papers</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

No NSW state budget first home grant changes so $5000 January 2016 reduction deadline looms

<html><body>
The NSW government - sitting on stamp duties that have almost doubled since taking office - will continue to reap the revenues until any correction.
The state budget didn't raise or lower property taxes, with spending on infrastructure the priority.
It noted the recent strength in the Sydney property boom was being especially driven by properties valued over $1.2 million, the NSW State Budget revealed, though the housing boom longevity is not being assumed by the NSW Treasury.
"The $1.2 million plus market accounted for only a relatively small proportion of properties, but made a large contribution to the growth in revenue," the budget papers advised.
The New South Wales budget was released at midday on Tuesday, with much information pre-released. 
The State Government revealed it is on track to deliver a record $2.1 billion surplus this financial year, instead of the deficit predicted in last year's budget.
The Government's improved financial bottom line is largely due to the stamp duty windfall in stamp duty, due to the Sydney housing boom.
The booming Sydney property market secured a record $7.29 billion revenue in stamp duty, up from $6 billion in 2013-14.
Revenue is tipped to rise to $7.8 billion in 2015-16, and to $8.6 billion by 2018-19.
Turbocharging Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian's first state budget, the tally, which includes residential and commercial property transactions, is $1.29 billion higher than forecast.
But the budget papers indicated residential stamp duty growth was expected to moderate to 11.8% in 2015-16 following growth rates of 21% in 2012-13; 39% in 2013-14 and an estimated 20% spurt in 2014-15.
"Transfer duty is a large and highly cyclical revenue source which is inherently volatile and can be subject to sharp corrections.
"Growth in transfer duty is now more narrowly based than at the beginning of the cycle."
It noted a number of atypical factors had extended the current cycle including  low interest rates, population growth and investor demand.
"Recent moves by APRA may also see a slowdown in activity," the budget papers advised.  
Figures from the Office of State Revenue showed that, by May, the Government had secured its budgeted figure of $6 billion in land transfer duties, two months ahead of the end of the financial year.
NSW has not adjusted its stamp duty rates for 31 years.
Transfer duty represents 28% of state government revenue. Land tax represents 10% 
Premier Mike Baird said increasing housing supply was the most effective action state governments could take on housing affordability, with plans that some of the extra revenue from stamp duty injected into the Housing Acceleration Fund to speed up the delivery of more housing and put downward pressure on home prices.
It will also establish a Greater Sydney Commission, tasked with ensuring targets for the construction of new homes are met.
No change to NSW first home buyer grants in the state budget <a href="/expert-insights/no-nsw-state-budget-first-home-grant-changes-so-5000-january-2016-reduction-deadline-looms">could intensify activity before the grant's 1 January 2016 reduction</a>. 
NSW land tax revenues are forecast to rise at a faster rate than stamp duty revenues, <a href="/expert-insights/nsw-land-tax-revenue-increases-to-outdo-stamp-duty-revenue-growth">according to the NSW state budget papers</a>.
</body></html>

Less revenue growth ahead but NSW State Budget benefits from $7.29 billion stamp duty bonanza

<html><body>
WA residential and commercial property investors are budgeted to pay an extra $826 million in property taxes over the next four years.
It follows State Treasurer Mike Nahan introducing the state's second consecutive land tax increases in last week’s State Budget.
This year’s move follows a 10% increase in land tax rates in last year's budget.
Commercial property and residential investors face a $300 flat tax for land with an unimproved value of between $300,000 and $420,000, and the raising of land tax rates on most properties valued above those levels.
Currently investment property is taxed at a rate of 0.11% of its value above $300,000, at 0.58% above $1 million and at 1.51% above $2.2 million.
Property with an unimproved value of less than $300,000 will remain free from land tax.
Only the top rate of the current land tax scale, the 2.67% levied on the value of land above $11 million remains unchanged in the State Budget.
The State Government now expects to collect $939 million in land tax with next financial year, it is expected to be 26% higher.
Mr Nahan says WA’s land tax regime remained “competitive” with other states citing a landholding with an unimproved value of $1 million being levied $1750 in land tax next year, up from $770 currently.
That compares to $9188 in NSW, $2975 in Victoria and $4500 in Queensland, he said.
</body></html>

Land tax hike for WA property investors

<html><body>
When the Budget was released this week I kept reading with great interest that the government had failed to address ‘housing affordability’. Truth be known the only thing that the Abbott government actually controls is foreign buyers and taxation such as negative gearing and capital gains tax. With regard to foreign buyers it has been well documented that with regard to this portfolio they have Failed it with a capital ‘F’.
In fairness the Federal government would respond by saying that to the contrary they have already unleashed the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) to forensically investigate all property transactions that they believe have contravened the laws. Well if it wasn’t for some bloggers and journalists who pointed this out to the Abbott government foreign buyers would be still running amok. I believe the findings will leave most property observers gobsmacked because I believe we are talking about thousands and thousands of sales.
It’s interesting to note that last week a Senate committee made 40 something recommendations pertaining to housing affordability which included calls to review negative gearing and the appointment of a federal minister for housing, to name just two. Well I have been vocal on not having a housing minister since the Abbott government came to office. More interesting was that Coalition senators immediately rejected the findings – well no surprises there.
If you look closely at the housing affordability debate it can be quickly summed up that data shows we are not building enough high density developments. I wrote about this recently – Lots of positives from discussing negative policies where the NSW government has recognised the problem stemming from municipal councils who are rejecting developments despite the Sydney population expanding at unprecedented levels. The NSW government wants to merge councils to free up more development to meet Sydney’s population explosion.
Should the NSW government be successful with its charter then the price of apartments will obviously come down as too rents. So I’m somewhat mystified why property investors are driving up apartment prices when such a major announcement is pending.
The Abbott government needs to take a very serious look at the legislation that allows foreign buyers to purchase off the plan. I believe that it would be sage for the Abbott government to place foreign buyers on – hold until the ATO has released its preliminary findings. What we are seeing today is Chinese developers out bidding the local developers simply because the off – the – plan legislation allows them to sell directly overseas to foreign buyers so these properties never even hit the Australian market. A vast number of these properties are land banked so they remain vacant which again is self-defeating and ludicrous that this can happen in this day and age.
This week we also read that there are foreign criminals trying to buy Australian real estate to wash their money by investing in real estate. Well this is nothing new as I have heard a few examples of agents who questioned some foreign buyers who expressed interest in landmark Sydney residences.
Thailand has had serious problems with the Russian mafia who have bought up significant parts of that country where the government announced a few years ago that it was cracking down hard on these transactions. This is a global problem where Australia immediately needs to take decisive action which also means tightening the many legal loopholes.
Take the recent divestment order on Villa del Mare where it was found that the Chinese purchaser did not have Australian residence. When I wrote about this <a href="/expert-insights/treasurer-joe-s-villa-del-nightmare-robert-simeon">Treasurer Joe’s Villa del Nightmare</a> on March 5 I said that the purchaser would find an Australian resident to buy the property. Well <a href="/news/australian-buyer-lola-wang-li-emerges-with-villa-del-mare-the-39-million-point-piper-firb-home">Australian buyer Lola Li emerges with Villa del Mare, the $39 million Point Piper FIRB home.</a>
The good news to come from this debate is that for the first time “the dogs are barking” and the Abbott government has to act – and act fast. Finding a viable solution to foreign buyers will prove a much harder assignment than towing back boats.
With regard to new developments, for starters there should be a selling ratio of foreign buyers to Australian residents established.
The Australian property industry has never before encountered such a debate and much of this stems from record low global cash rates. Investors are chasing returns and Sydney is one of the hottest property markets on the globe.
The Abbott government needs to send a very clear message to foreign buyers which is either buy or bye?
Mosman Market
When you look closely at the actual numbers of properties on the market you will struggle to say that the market is booming or bubbling as some prefer to say. Historically when markets are booming this coincides with record volumes being on the market which is otherwise known as a feeding frenzy. The confusing parts about our local markets are that stock levels are down 50 per cent on this time last year or thereabouts.
MOSMAN – 2088
• Number of houses on the market this time last year – 102
• Number of houses on the market last week – 57
• Number of houses on the market this week – 57
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year – 72
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 50
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 49
CREMORNE – 2090
• Number of houses on the market this time last year – 7
• Number of houses on the market last week – 3
• Number of houses on the market this week – 4
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year – 27
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 13
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 10
NEUTRAL BAY – 2089
• Number of houses on the market this time last year – 7
• Number of houses on the market last week – 3
•Number of houses on the market this week – 3
• Number of apartments on the market this time last year– 48
• Number of apartments on the market last week – 31
• Number of apartments on the market this week – 27
 Source: APM Price Finder
</body></html>

robertsimeon-hRNTwJyXkQ

Do we tell foreign buyers to buy or bye? Robert Simeon

<html><body>
Small businesses with a turnover of less than $2m can now claim an immediate tax deduction when purchasing plant equipment valued under $20,000.
This new tax break will deliver an early Xmas present to fit-out contractors who specialise in restaurant and small office refurbishments.
I was surprised by the quantum of the tax break.
I think $20,000 as an immediate tax deduction for individual items is a huge amount and an incredible incentive to bring that fit-out forward.
Fit-out contractors now believe in Santa Claus and he’s taken the form of Joe Hockey.
We recently refurbished our office for a cost of $202,000 and were able to claim $35,000 in depreciation in the first year. If we’d carried out the same fit-out today our first year depreciation would’ve been over $123,000.
That’s a huge difference.
Quantity Surveyors are experts in breaking down the overall construction cost into individual items and now has never been a more appropriate time to do this.
There are four main points to consider:
<ol>
<li>Small businesses should ensure a detailed report of any fit-out costs be carried out.</li>
<li>When acquiring any new asset, small businesses should try to keep the costs below $20,000.</li>
<li>This generous bonus has an expiry date of June 30, 2017.</li>
<li>Assets costing over $20,000 can still be depreciated but not claimed as an outright deduction.</li>
</ol>
Some examples of what may qualify for an immediate tax deduction include carpet, desks, blinds, work stations and a lighting upgrade.
Now has never been a better time to upgrade that office or refurbish your restaurant.
TYRON HYDE is director of <a href="https://www.washingtonbrown.com.au/" target="_blank">Washington Brown Quantity Surveyors</a>.
His book <a href="https://www.claim-it.com.au/?utm_source=wbsite&amp;utm_medium=image&amp;utm_campaign=homepagebanner" target="_blank">CLAIM IT!</a> helps property investors maximise their tax benefits through smart deprecation.
</body></html>

tyronhyde-GVUTYT8ZT3

Christmas for contractors as Hockey delivers: Tyron Hyde

<html><body>
The Queensland government has ruled out introducing new taxes on foreign buyers of residential real estate.
They are the only state that actually monitors foreign investment, so were in the box seat to implement such a tax regime.
The rejection comes after the populist Victoria Labor government's recent budget unveiled a new tax regime that will seek to tax foreign buyers and foreign owners.
Queensland has vowed not to ­follow Victoria’s lead and introduce any new taxes on foreign property investors.
Treasurer Curtis Pitt said Queensland welcomed foreign property investment.
“We’re ruling out any stamp duty surcharges for foreign investors who purchase a house in Queensland," said Pitt.
"We’re also ruling out any land tax surcharge for foreign investors in this state.”
The Victorian state budget, revealed on Tuesday, included a 3%t stamp duty surcharge for homes from July and land tax increases of 0.5% from 2016 for offshore-based investors. 
News Ltd reported Queensland executive director of the Property Council, Chris Mountford saying the action will strengthen Queensland’s position on the global investment map.
“In particular it creates a compelling case to invest in Queensland over Victoria.”
Nothing new for Queensland as that was how former premier Joh Bjelke Petersen saw the state into an upswing when Queensland didn't have death duties like other states.
It was in 1977 when the Premier of Queensland Joh Bjelke Petersen abolished death duties and a wave of Australia's elderly headed towards the Gold Coast with the high rise following as dying in Queensland became a tax avoidance scheme and Surfers Paradise became a retirement haven.
</body></html>

Queensland says no new taxes on foreign property buyers in Bjelke Petersen-like strategy

<html><body>
Forget about the folks - asset wealthy part pensioners - passing down the holiday home. 
Treasurer Joe Hockey's 2015 proposed pension change will ensure that elderly parents will have to liquidate the longtime family holiday home to afford to live under any new asset test regime targeted at existing pensioners facing the end of their entitlement.
However couples approaching retirement - and aware of the rules in advance - will possibly compromise on their superannuation voluntary contributions - or sell one of the two $400,000 investment properties - and instead push the funds towards buying an untaxed, un-counted bigger, better home that can be beneficially sold later in retirement.
Without the pension, the immediate likelihood after any January 2017 implementation is that it will be no longer feasible for the grandparents to hold onto the beach house - perhaps initially at least putting it in the 2017 Christmas holiday rental pool to raise some funds to pay the rates and put food on the table.
Social Services Minister Scott Morrison has flagged proposed changes to the pension assets test saying that 91,000 current part pensioners will no longer qualify for the pension and a further 235,000 will have their part pension reduced.
If the legislation is passed, the government will reduce the maximum value of assets to qualify for a part pension, which for couples is currently up to $1.15 million plus the family home.
For couples who own their own home, the asset threshold will be reduced to $823,000.
For single home-owners, the assets test cut-out will be $547,000, down from $775,500.
It is currently suggested people who lose their pension are set to keep the Commonwealth Seniors Health Card which provides access to concessional medicines, but lose their Pensioner Concession Card which secures discounts at the state level on rates, transport and utilities.
Over-55s hold 58% per cent of Australia’s wealth. But the majority is locked up in the family home.
News Ltd papers reported Scott Morrison had only kind words for those retirees who will lose access to the pension.
"My first word to the 91,000 is to thank them for providing for their own retirement," he told reporters in Sydney on Thursday.
"Those affected by these changes have assets, and by drawing down on those assets to those modest amounts they will be in a position to maintain their incomes."
The proposal presents anxiety for the over-50s population, currently 7 million and expected to double by 2050.
Through paid employment, volunteering and care-giving roles, older Australians are estimated to contribute $90 billion a year to the economy and community, the National Seniors Australia recently reported.
The family home, often the most valuable asset Australians own, both materially and emotionally, will remain outside the age pension means test under the proposal.
But the 2015 budget has yet to emerge as providing any solution for older Australians who require age-appropriate housing, which can be secured by rightsizing.
Infact quite the reverse is now the logical prospect in the lead up to the 2017 implementation given the principle place of residence remains sacrosanct in government policy.
"An innovative approach is required to enable seniors to access their equity wealth and downsize without the additional risks and disincentives of reverse mortgages, and without the fear of a negative impact on their Age Pension," National Seniors Australia seek.
The former Labor government’s Housing Help for Seniors pilot scheme, announced in the 2013-14 budget, was deemed a step in the right direction, however, the restrictions on the use of the excess sale funds and requirement to have lived in the home for 25 years, restricted its usefulness to older Australians. 
“A significant number of older Australians will be adversely impacted, so it is critical that clear information and access to advice are a priority so they can consider their position and the adjustments they may need to undertake,” the National Seniors Australia chief executive Michael O’Neill said.=
“These changes will cause anxiety, particularly for those older Australians who have been in receipt of a part pension.”
</body></html>

Upsizing homes before retirement - and forget passing down the holiday shack: Joe Hockey's 2015 budget pension implications

<html><body>
Victorian Treasurer budget papers warned that the most likely risk to predicted Victorian tax revenue was posed by ­reduced stamp duty income if ­investor sentiment wanes.
Treasury figures show stamp duty revenue from Victoria's property market rose by 27% in 2013-14.
Property taxes are forecast to contribute $7.7 billion to the state's total $18.2 billion tax revenue in the current financial year.
The higher income from property offsets recent weaker revenue from gambling taxes.
"As the upward momentum of the current cycle builds, so does the likelihood of a correction, as has been the case in past property cycles," Treasury warned.
The strong property has also boosted land taxes forecast to be around $1.8 billion next financial year.
The new 3% land transfer duty surcharge for non-resident Australians is tipped to add a $39.5 million in 2015-16.
Treasurer Tim Pallas said the government was still working through how its new taxes for foreign buyers would be applied. 
A 0.5% land tax surcharge for absentee owners of Victorian property will also be imposed next year, expected to raise $53 million over four years.
“Let’s be frank — the state of Victoria has a very high dependence on the performance of the property market through both land tax and stamp duty,” Pallas said.
“That that is a risk to the budget is, I think, an undeniable fact.”
</body></html>

Victorian Treasury fears Melbourne property price correction

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
It is budget time again and, like on many previous occasions, the voices seeking easy publicity are calling louder and louder for the abolition of negative gearing. Housing affordability is a hot topic in an environment where property prices are rising, in some places quite significantly, so the media is happily running with this agenda without questioning the basis of various claims.
But how can you have an honest debate on the issues involved if none of those commenting against negative gearing demonstrate enough knowledge on the topic they are talking about?
Dispelling myths about negative gearing is like trying to convince a 3 year old that "spinach is good for you"… It requires some maturity to comprehend the topic of the discussion before one is able to participate without any prejudice.
It may appear as a harsh and provocative assessment of those criticising negative gearing and Australia’s current tax arrangements - especially since the anti-negative gearing voices include prominent economists, managers of investment funds, various social think-tank organisation and media personalities. But if you scrutinise what they are saying it is very obvious they are just repeating overheard phrases without any understanding of the meaning of what these words really mean. Just like the aforementioned 3 year olds…
Just to illustrate, the prevailing theme is that negative gearing is a "cost to taxpayers"… Really? How about taking a class in basic accounting to understand the principles of cash flow before making any such statements publicly? Then the commentator would understand the negative gearing is all about cash flow and not about profit and therefore, that it is neutral from an overall tax perspective. (I explained the mechanics in my earlier article if you care to read - <a href="/news/negative-gearing-the-three-facts-that-will-challenge-your-assumptions">Negative gearing: The three facts that will challenge your assumptions</a>).
Then there are ideas about changing the provisions to allow negative gearing on new properties only, to increase new build. Yeah, right, great idea. Let’s keep all those people unable to buy isolated in renter ghettos, or relegate them to city fringes, and keep the suburbs pristine and free from temporary drifters. Let’s repeat those social housing experiments from 1960’s and 1970’s (this time round with private money) which legacy is still haunting parts of our capital cities half a century later.
Of course I am exaggerating the possible consequences but only to highlight that those who call for such arrangements did not think through the full consequence of what may happen. Ask yourself, where is the greatest demand for rental accommodation? Of course, in city centres and along major transport routes. This is where investors are providing the bulk of rental stock - because this is where the demand is. And of course this is, in the great majority of instances, second-hand and not brand new stock for a very obvious reason.
“But” they say, “if properties were cheaper in those convenient locations, more people could afford to buy there and would not need to rent”. Great logic. Sure, let’s implement policies that will allow converting everything in such locations to cheap owner-occupier housing – and then we will end up with a real housing affordability problem for those who prefer or are forced to rent. But sure enough, taxpayers will be very happy to spend billions of dollars to address it, no worries.
The premise that renters will buy “cheap houses” rather than continue renting would be amusing if it was not promoted so seriously by those prominent commentators. The naivety of such thinking, on such a large scale (mind you, without any evidence and/or testing the assumptions), is staggering.
One only needs to look to late 1990 to understand why such thinking has no merit whatsoever. In particular, towards the end of 1990’s, the cost of owning a property was at a historically low level and in many locations renting was costing more than paying off a property and still, not everybody was prepared to buy, even if they could afford it easily.
All those commentators are forgetting the basic logic that drives people’s decisions – if prices are cheap, they are so for a reason. That is, owning is perceived by the majority as unattractive and without a merit, and cheap prices in relation to rental expenses only reinforce this perception. People need to perceive a positive outlook for the property market to want to own the place of their residence - this outlook can only be reinforced by a history of rising prices. It’s as simple as that, yet so difficult to comprehend for many.
Then we have such pearls of wisdom like grandfathering negative gearing on existing purchases but, at the same time, allowing for the writing-off of operational loses against capital gains. Great, let’s make tax affairs so complicated that nobody will be able to figure out whether they are making money or losing it. Accountants will love it and growth of employment at the Tax Office will propel Australia’s economic growth for the next few decades.
Or how about proclaiming that before 1986 there were no property investors in Australia (because this is what housing finance statistics “show”) and that the “current property investment boom crisis” is the fault of Keating and Hawke re-introducing negative gearing and Howard and Costello halving the capital gains tax on investment properties? This position conveniently disregards the fact that the proportions of rental stock remained relatively static for many, many decades. So what is really going on?
<img src="/images/2015/05/04/Occupied_private_dwellings.png" alt="">
Those commentators simply don’t comprehend that there was a shift in the investor profile from, a situation where a single person owned entire blocks of flats, to that where now many individual investors only own one flat each. Those aforementioned policies were just a catalyst enabling this transition to happen.
And because of these policies, people now have a choice to either live where they are and invest their extra money in the long term rental accommodation business (yes, it is a business after all) or upgrade their primary residence - and the financial outcome is the same at the end. Unbelievable but true, once you do the math.
But the biggest fable of all is that negative gearing is the reason prices are “so high” today. So, by removing negative gearing, we will restore “housing affordability” - whatever that means. Pity not many can understand what is really driving property prices in Australia.
It doesn’t fit in these people’s agendas that the cost of buying and renting in Australia is close to its historically best level, and that housing is more affordable now than at many points in time in the last three decades. Even in Sydney – the apparent “epicentre of housing speculation”.
<img src="/images/2015/05/04/Long_term_purchase_affordability_Sydney.png" alt="">
Interestingly enough, NSW’s share of net rental income losses was only 5.7% in the 2012-13 financial year (or $312 million out of $5.5B claimed by investors – as per Table 15 of recently published statistics that show all income and expense items from rental property schedules, by the state/territory location of the property). This means that just two years ago, in aggregate, profits from long term rental accommodation business in NSW almost matched losses.
In other words, negative gearing was not as widespread in NSW as everybody is led to believe. No surprise here at all since purchases with gross rental yields of 6-7% were not that uncommon in Sydney in 2012. But why bother with facts that spoil a “good story” for media attention.
By the way, where were these commentators in 1997-99, 2005/6, 2009 or 2012-13 when there were ample opportunities to buy property cheaply? Why they were not heralding those opportunities then as loudly as they now voice their opposition to negative gearing? (As a side note, did you notice how regularly these opportunities come about?) There is a simple answer - because back then they were chasing media headlines with another favourite crowd pleaser - the upcoming Armageddon.
My, in many ways, aggressive and ironic commentary serves the purpose of mobilising you - the reader - to start confronting these commentators and questioning their understanding of a concept they are so outspoken about. And secondly, treating what you read and hear on the news about negative gearing with a fair dose of scepticism.
After all, in the whole scheme of things, negative gearing is inconsequential for individual property investors – sure, it helps with cash flow but it does not impact profitability and certainly, it does not make houses more expensive. So, its abolition would not change a thing – but that point of view is missing from the public debate.
Journalists are failing in their duty to present information objectively by not offering contrasting opinions and, most importantly, by not questioning individual commentators on merits of their points of view.
I have a tip for anybody who wants to know whether a particular commentator has any idea about the topic of negative gearing - check if they consider negative gearing to be a cost to taxpayers, or offering extra profit for investors, or none of the above. If they do consider it a cost or extra profit opportunity, then you know you cannot take seriously anything they say, no matter what other credentials they present.
Arek Drozda is an independent property market analyst. Follow on Twitter @arekdrozda.
 
 
 
</body></html>

Budget

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Budget

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News