Developers and apartment buyers have a narrowing window of opportunity before Brisbane's Olympic infrastructure pipeline begins competing directly with residential construction, pushing up costs, tightening labour supply and making new projects increasingly difficult to deliver.

While Brisbane's apartment market continues to benefit from strong population growth and limited housing supply, industry research suggests the years leading up to 2027 could prove to be the most important period for developers looking to secure builders and buyers hoping to purchase before the next wave of price increases.

A new Colliers report, Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games: Creating Solutions, highlights the scale of the challenge. While thousands of new homes are planned across South East Queensland, the Brisbane Olympic Athletes Village alone will deliver more than 10,500 beds during the Games before being converted into around 1,750 to 2,000 apartments. Equivalent to almost two years of typical inner-city apartment supply, the project will also absorb a significant share of the construction workforce and building materials.

The broader construction pipeline paints an even clearer picture.

Construction Skills Queensland's Horizon 2032 report forecasts Queensland's annual construction pipeline will average $69 billion over the coming years before peaking at $75 billion in 2027-28. Demand for construction workers is expected to increase by 17 per cent to almost 150,000 people, with the industry facing an annual shortfall of around 19,000 workers that could blow out to as many as 35,000 during the peak construction period.

The Olympic venues, athletes village and supporting infrastructure will account for billions of dollars worth of work across South East Queensland through to 2032, creating intense competition for labour at a time when Australia's residential construction sector is already under pressure.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=373834]

Colliers Queensland Residential Director Andrew Scriven said the convergence of these projects is creating a clear window of opportunity for both developers and buyers.

"From 2027 onwards, the market will shift dramatically," Scriven said.

"Labour will increasingly be locked into government-led infrastructure and Olympic projects, which means private residential developments will face higher costs and tighter margins. The developers who move now are the ones most likely to get projects off the ground."

Scriven said the same dynamic would also affect buyers, with fewer apartment projects expected to launch once construction capacity tightens.

"If you're looking to change your lifestyle over the next five years, now is your window of opportunity to buy."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150713 project_image_fid=373827]

Developers are already positioning themselves ahead of that window.

Following the success of Monarch at Toowong, Consolidated Properties is preparing to launch two new Brisbane apartment projects in the second half of 2026. They include <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/gloriette-30-bedivere-street-yeerongpilly-qld-4105">Gloriette</a> at Yeerongpilly Green, a 25-storey tower within one of Brisbane's key Olympic precincts, and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/castile-47-skyring-terrace-newstead-qld-4006">Castile</a>, a recently approved 25-storey riverfront development at 47 Skyring Terrace in Newstead.

Hutchinson Builders will deliver both projects, with early works already underway at Yeerongpilly and Newstead expected to commence later this year.

The timing comes as Brisbane's fundamentals continue to strengthen, with strong interstate migration, population growth and vacancy rates remaining below 1.5 per cent.

Colliers Queensland researcher Pragya Sharma said Greater Brisbane is forecast to require around 40,000 new apartments between 2021 and 2031.

"There's a real mismatch emerging between when housing is needed and when it will be feasible to build," Sharma said.

"As a result, the period leading up to 2027 presents a key window of opportunity for developers to secure approvals, funding and construction capacity, while buyers will have greater choice before supply constraints intensify."

Colliers research outlines a critical pre-2027 window to start residential projects before labour squeeze: now is the time to buy

Joel Robinson

Developers, buyers on watch in South East Queensland ahead of construction crunch: Colliers

It's taken less than nine months for developer Sherpa Property Group to sell out all 51 apartments in its <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-oasis-palm-beach-7-9-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Oasis</a> development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/palm-beach-qld-4221">Palm Beach</a>, over a year before its anticipated completion.

&nbsp;

Located at 7-9 Sixth Avenue, the $67 million development has resonated strongly with both local owner-occupiers and downsizers seeking high-quality apartments within walking distance of the beach, dining precincts and everyday amenities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357458]

Christie Leet, Founder of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sherpa-property-group">Sherpa Group</a>, said the sell-out reflected both the strength of the Palm Beach market and the success of Sherpa's community-first approach to development.

"The sell-out of Oasis is a fantastic outcome and reinforces the strong demand we're seeing for thoughtfully designed apartments in lifestyle locations," Leet said.

"From the outset, our vision was to create a development that genuinely enhanced the Palm Beach community while providing residents with exceptional homes and wellness-focused amenities.

"We've been incredibly encouraged by the level of local support throughout the campaign, 72.5 per cent of buyers are locals, with a significant proportion of purchasers choosing Oasis as their future home rather than an investment."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357463]

Construction is now progressing following development approval, with trusted builder LPS Group delivering the project and completion anticipated in Q3 2027.

Oasis forms part of Sherpa Group's successful Flourish collection, which has become recognised for its focus on wellness, community and elevated coastal living.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=151449 project_image_fid=357469]

Residents will have private access to a rooftop amenity space featuring a pool, gym, sauna, steam room, hot and cold plunge pools, spa and barbecue facilities.

"The success of Oasis demonstrates that buyers continue to prioritise quality, location and lifestyle," Leet said.

"We are proud to have delivered a project that has resonated so strongly with the market and look forward to bringing Oasis to life for our future residents."

Sherpa recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/flourish-soleira-palm-beach-1150-1160-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Soleira</a>, its third instalment of the Flourish brand in Palm Beach following Flourish Oasis and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/amargo-6-12-sixth-avenue-palm-beach-qld-4221">Flourish Amargo</a>.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=151449]

Sherpa sells out Flourish Oasis in booming Palm Beach

Urban Property Group's <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/la-vera-macquarie-park-94-talavera-road-macquarie-park-nsw-2113">La Vera</a> is leading the next phase of Macquarie Park's residential evolution, with the new apartment development set to become the first of several new apartment projects in the precinct to complete.

The 169-apartment building has now topped out ahead of its scheduled completion in the third quarter of 2026, as new residential investment continues to reshape one of Sydney's largest employment hubs into a true mixed-use precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=368645]

Cox Architecture has designed La Vera to capture the best of its unique positioning on Talavera Road, orienting the building towards Lane Cove National Park.&nbsp;The building features a sculpted northern façade with flowing curves inspired by the surrounding landscape, while its city-facing elevation adopts a more structured architectural expression to maximise skyline views.

"The vision for the project was to conceive a building that adopted an organic and curvilinear form to the northern portion that faces the Lane Cove National Park," <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">Cox Architecture</a> Director Felipe Miranda said.

"The residents that reside in the northern portion of the building benefit by having beautifully crafted curved balconies that speak to the natural context and heighten the relationship of their internal living spaces to the external balconies."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=358802]

La Vera offers a diverse mix of one, two, three, and four-bedroom configurations, with prices currently starting from $740,000. Buyers so far have been a mix of Sydney-based investors,&nbsp;metro commuters, owner-occupiers and downsizers from surrounding North Shore suburbs.

Both investors and owner-occupiers have been drawn to La Vera's proximity to Macquarie University, Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie Centre and the Sydney Metro, infrastructure that supports both strong rental demand and a convenient lifestyle for residents.

The apartments feature full-height glazing, timber flooring throughout living areas, stone kitchen benchtops, SMEG appliances, floor-to-ceiling bathroom tiling and ducted air conditioning.

Residents will have access to a rooftop recreation level featuring a swimming pool, sauna, barbecue facilities and landscaped relaxation areas, complemented by additional communal space at ground level. Many apartments enjoy uninterrupted views across Lane Cove National Park, reinforcing the project's connection to its natural setting.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134951 project_image_fid=364551]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a>, a family-owned developer and builder with nearly four decades of experience, holds a 4.5-star iCIRT rating and was Australia's first developer to introduce 10-Year Latent Defects Insurance (LDI). La Vera is the first apartment development in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/macquarie-park-nsw-2113">Macquarie Park</a> approved to offer the additional insurance protection, alongside a five-year warranty on SMEG appliances.

Urban Property Group CEO Patrick Elias said the additional protection reflects changing buyer expectations in the off the plan market.

"Consumers are a lot more weary and a lot more concerned in buying off the plan than they ever have been. Having LDI is a tool to portray the confidence that we have in our product, and a confidence we want buyers to share," Elias said.

Following completion of the building later this year, buyers will move into their apartments well before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134951]

La Vera closes in on completion as Macquarie Park continues residential transformation

Brisbane developer Red &amp; Co's decision to include dual key apartments in its debut Gold Coast apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/como-varsity-lakes-22-lake-street-varsity-lakes-qld-4227">COMO Varsity Lakes</a>, is proving to be one of the project's biggest drawcards, with buyers quickly snapping up the flexible residences.

More than half of the project's 36 dual key apartments have already sold, helping drive COMO beyond the 50 per cent sold mark within the first month of launch.

The strong response highlights growing demand for apartment designs that can adapt to changing lifestyles, with buyers increasingly looking for homes that accommodate multi-generational living, provide rental income opportunities or simply offer greater flexibility over time.

Located on the shores of Lake Orr, COMO will deliver 156 apartments across 16 levels, with the dual-key residences forming a limited release within the broader development.

Each combines a primary two-bedroom apartment with a fully self-contained studio on a single title, connected by a shared foyer and lockable internal door. The design allows owners to house ageing parents, adult children or guests while maintaining privacy, or lease the secondary residence to generate additional income.

Just 17 of the original 36 dual key apartments remain available.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=367096]

The innovative configuration combines two fully self-contained residences on a single title, typically comprising a primary two-bedroom apartment alongside a separate studio residence, connected via a shared foyer and lockable internal door.&nbsp;

The model is proving particularly attractive to owner occupiers navigating changing family dynamics and the realities of the current housing crisis.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363511]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/npa">NPA</a>&nbsp;CEO Andrew Erwin said dual key living was resonating strongly with modern buyers because it delivered both financial flexibility and practical lifestyle benefits.&nbsp;

“The housing crisis and rising cost of living are fundamentally changing how Australians think about home ownership,” Erwin said.&nbsp;

“Dual key apartments provide a genuine solution for families who want to stay connected while maintaining independence. Parents can help adult children save for a future home, ageing parents can remain nearby without moving into aged care, and owners still retain privacy and flexibility.

“Importantly, buyers are also recognising the financial advantages. It creates the opportunity to generate additional income from part of the home without the holding costs associated with owning a separate investment property.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363509]

Unlike traditional dual occupancy arrangements, the residences operate under a single title, meaning owners only incur one set of body corporate fees, council rates and holding costs.&nbsp;

The secondary residence can also evolve over time - functioning as guest accommodation, a home office, creative studio or private retreat before later becoming an income-producing asset.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/red-co">Red &amp; Co</a>&nbsp;Director and Co-Founder David Laverty said the strong early sales reflected growing buyer urgency and changing priorities within the market.&nbsp;

“Securing more than half of COMO’s residences within such a short timeframe is an outstanding result and a clear endorsement of both the design and location,” Laverty said.&nbsp;

“Buyers are responding to the combination of location, connectivity and amenity, but ultimately it’s value relative to other East Coast markets that is driving enquiry.”&nbsp;

“We’re also seeing strong interest from owner occupiers looking for homes that can adapt with them over time. Flexibility has become one of the most important considerations for buyers in today’s market.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135546 project_image_fid=363515]

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bda-architecture">BDA Architecture</a>, COMO features a mix of one-, two- and three-bedroom residences with 2.7-metre ceilings and larger-format floorplans aimed at owner occupiers, downsizers and lifestyle-focused buyers.&nbsp;

The development will feature an extensive rooftop recreation and wellness offering including a 25-metre lap pool, sundeck, barbecue and dining areas, gym, sauna, plunge baths, landscaped gardens, wellness spaces and rooftop pickleball and paddleball courts.

The remaining dual key apartments range from 137 sqm to 167 sqm and include generous three-bedroom layouts with separate self-contained studio accommodation and dual parking.&nbsp;

Erwin said the dual key concept represented a broader shift in how Australians would live in the future.

“People want homes that can evolve with their lives,” he said.&nbsp;

“A dual key apartment can suit a family today, support an ageing parent tomorrow, and potentially generate income later on. That adaptability is becoming incredibly valuable in the current environment.”

Prices currently range from $2,115,750 to $2,583,000.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135546]

Inter-generational living drives demand for COMO’s dual key apartments as housing pressures reshape buyer priorities 

Builder-developer&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/ceerose">Ceerose</a> has doubled down on its Leichhardt ambitions, lodging its second State Significant Development Application (SSDA) in the suburb in the last six months.

Their newest proposal seeks to transform a former industrial precinct into a new residential community centred around the adaptive reuse of one of the site's heritage warehouse buildings.

The new project, on a 6,930 sqm block at&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/40-76-william-street-leichhardt-nsw-2040">40–76 William Street</a>, will bring more than 200 apartments to a suburb that has seen little to no new supply in recent years. It follows Ceerose's late 2025 SSDA for a mixed-use apartment project on nearby Parramatta Road, signalling the developer's growing investment in Sydney's Inner West.

Ceerose Founder Edward Doueihi told Apartments.com.au the developer’s long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West had given it a strong understanding of how the area has evolved and where its future opportunities lie.

“Ceerose has had a long-standing presence in Leichhardt and the Inner West, giving us a unique understanding of the area’s evolution and future potential,” Doueihi said.

“Having delivered projects throughout the region, we have witnessed the suburb’s transformation first-hand and understand the opportunities for its continued growth.”

Doueihi said that understanding also informed the planning process, with a comprehensive Stakeholder Engagement Outcomes Report prepared before the application was lodged.

The report identified the key issues and concerns raised by neighbouring residents and other stakeholders, allowing those matters to be considered and incorporated into the design where appropriate.

He said the delivery of additional housing would also play an important role in supporting the revitalisation of Norton Street and the Italian Forum.

“By increasing the local residential population, the development is expected to strengthen demand for local businesses, encourage further investment, and help restore the vibrancy that made the precinct a thriving destination in the early 2000s.”

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="7258c54c-8167-479e-8361-2d5fca9915b4" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010B%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%202.jpg?VersionId=S9DQfxu_jpcB5LrAEYFUbyMzg5odW6i5" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a>, the redevelopment would involve the demolition of four existing industrial buildings while retaining and adaptively reusing the site's most significant warehouse. The retained structure would anchor a new residential precinct comprising five interconnected buildings arranged around a large central landscaped courtyard, with heights stepping from five storeys along the surrounding residential streets to 11 storeys at the William Street corner.

According to the Architecture Design Report by Woods Bagot, the proposal "seeks to create a residential village centred around a generous green heart while celebrating the site's industrial heritage through the adaptive reuse of the existing warehouse building."

The development would comprise 203 apartments, with 188 proposed as build-to-sell residences, alongside 15 affordable housing apartments.

Rather than treating the retained warehouse as a standalone heritage object, Woods Bagot has sought to weave the site's industrial history throughout the masterplan. The proposal retains the north and west facades of the landmark corner warehouse, while new buildings reinterpret the site's brick-and-steel industrial language through their material palette and architectural expression.

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9e8c64c2-881b-49e1-8c90-6b6acaaa45b6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010C%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%203.jpg?VersionId=Qm8_8H_Xrg_sc4Mdjc59vlAcKF_5wRTb" />

The design is organised around what Woods Bagot describes as a "green heart", a landscaped communal open space that reinstates the leafy character removed when the site became an industrial storage facility. A new pedestrian laneway running through the site would improve permeability between William, North and Francis streets, linking residents through landscaped public spaces while activating the ground plane.

Residents would have access to communal gardens and shared recreation areas distributed throughout the development. Sustainability has also been prioritised, with the project targeting an average 7.9-star NatHERS rating. Proposed initiatives include rooftop solar generation, rainwater harvesting, passive solar design, naturally ventilated lobbies, extensive cross-ventilation and the reuse of existing building fabric to reduce embodied carbon.

The adaptive reuse strategy became a defining feature of the application after heritage investigations found only one of the site's industrial buildings could feasibly be retained. The Heritage Impact Statement concludes that preserving the key warehouse façades while referencing the site's industrial character throughout the new development provides an appropriate balance between renewal and conservation.

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="efffafdb-594f-4e2b-a067-921fd51c05e1" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010D%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%204.jpg?VersionId=DPmE4.k16YRt0i27hEZVtJAffarpvUfx" />

"Retention and adaptation of the site buildings has been explored but found not to be feasible except for the tallest building, whose street facades will be retained," the heritage report states.

"The proposed building will interpret the brick and steel character of the subject site, including reuse of some components and construction of a large 'sawtooth' structure in the proposed open space."

<img alt="First look: Ceerose returns to Leichhardt with 203-apartment adaptive reuse proposal at former warehouse site" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3bfef2b5-83f5-40cd-9cab-767092f34266" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Appendix%2010E%20-%20CGI%20-%20View%205.jpg?VersionId=7asb3i_ql4ybbuJOUb5UHBEIy0Q9t.DF" />

The William Street site is located around 300 metres from Leichhardt North Light Rail station and a short walk to Norton Street's retail, dining and hospitality precinct. The surrounding area has increasingly become a focus for urban renewal given its proximity to public transport and the Parramatta Road corridor.

Doueihi founded Ceerose in 1998 and has grown the business to become one of Sydney's more active apartment developers in recent years, with completed projects including The Alex Collective in Alexandria, Abbie's Lane in Annandale, and the award-winning Munro House in Elizabeth Bay. They are currently delivering Belgravia, 17 luxury apartments in Potts Point.

First look: Ceerose doubles down in Leichhardt with adaptive reuse of former warehouse site

Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi,
I'm thinking about purchasing a property that has been built in underneath with no council approval. The problem is that it is a high set home on recently flood zoned area of <a href="/news">Logan</a>. My question is, is it still possible to get building certification for lower levels in flood areas or does the council never allow it?
Margaret Lomas' answer is on the next page. Please click below to continue.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
When you own a house or unit in any local government area, it is your duty to ensure that the building codes provided by the state department of planning, and administered locally by the council's own planning departments, are adhered to. 
This also means that, if you make any changes to a property which has previously been approved as compliant, you must first ask council for permission to make such changes.
These rules exist for many reasons - to ensure that an area remains aesthetically pleasing, to provide safe living environments for residents, and to protect the environment itself. If you have ever visited a country where there is no building code, and seen how the residential areas look when people build whatever they like, you will better appreciate these rules! 
You will also know that when a natural disaster strikes, the loss and injury caused is far more catastrophic, often due to the unsafe nature of what has been built and the overbuilding of those areas.
And so to your dilemma. You are thinking of buying  property with an unapproved alteration, and you should know that the council is within their rights to ask you to revert it back if they so desire. If the council feels for any reason that the alteration contravenes the current development rules, or in any way poses a risk to the surrounding community in the event of a flood, then they will ask you to revert it. 
You should check the flood maps available on the Logan City Council website, and see if this property falls within a flood zone. If so, your chances of having this alteration retrospectively approved is next to none, and the chances of being asked to remove the alteration is in play.
You should ask the current owner to either have the alteration approved prior to your purchase, or provide a letter from the council attesting to the fact that the alterations do not contravene any planning rules, and would be otherwise approved if you submit a development application. Then, as soon as you settle, take the steps to have the alterations approved to remove any future doubt.
 
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: What happens if I buy a house with an unapproved alteration?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
My husband and I would like to build granny flat through an SMSF at our own home – is this possible to do?
Lyn
 
Dear Lyn,
This one is a tricky one. I consulted Property Success team member Ian Rodrigues to get his thoughts and talk it through.
I’m not sure what it is that you are hoping to see as an outcome for doing this. Presumably, you are thinking that you can either get rental income from the granny flat into the super and it will be an inexpensive project since you won’t need to pay for the land, or that you can ‘rent’ some of your land to the super fund for the purposes of building the flat.
The issue is, once a building is built on a piece of land, that building becomes the property of the owner of the land.  And so the super rules would prohibit this, as the asset would no longer be owned by that super fund.
In talking this through with Ian, we considered what may happen if the granny flat was one of the mobile varieties, such as those often erected in holiday or mobile home parks. In this case, the super fund would be buying the flat as ‘plant’ and you would be allowing that piece of plant to be housed on your land. Technically speaking, if this piece of plant was fully mobile and could be shifted from place to place, it may be allowed, as the super fund can retain the ownership of this piece of plant, and receive any rent it attracted.   
Keep in mind that this granny flat would not be able to be rented out to any parties related in any way to the super fund, so if you’re thinking it could be a good way to get a place for the kids or a relative, then you won’t be allowed to do this. You may be able to personally receive rent on the land you provide to park the mobile home on. I say this because if you were, say, a plumber by trade, and your super fund rental property needed a plumber, you can carry out the work and be paid for that work.  I can’t see a lot of difference between that and receiving rent for land you provide.
The best way to check if any of this is allowable is to have a lawyer experienced in super fund law to check it out for you, or get a ruling from the tax office. As with all questions of this nature, pass it by your accountant to see what they think.
Regards,
Margaret
Have a property question?   <a href="mailto:admin@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

A granny flat with your SMSF? Ask Margaret Lomas

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I converted my main residence to a rental property and bought a house to live and then sold the old/rented property. The property was my principal home, built in 2009 and I occupied it from 2009 to 2015. I then rented and sold it with settlement in 2017 February. 
When calculating capital gains tax (CGT) for my old property, can I add unclaimed interest and rates  to the market valuation I got from when it first started producing income? 
For rental schedule can I include interest up to settlement date, even though the rental contract ended?
Thanks,
Todd
 
Hi Todd, 
When a former family home is subsequently rented out, there are specific rules around the subsequent capital gains tax treatment which will now apply to you.
If you do not wish to claim your principal place of residence on any other property, you can employ the absence rule which allows you to rent that property out for up to six years and, if you either sell it or move back into it within that time, you still don’t accrue a capital gains tax responsibility.
In your case, you may decide to shift that exemption to the new home you bought from the date you moved in, in which case there will be a small CGT liability for you.  Assuming you have a valuation from the date you moved out, you can reset the cost base to being that market valuation, and CGT will apply to any gain made since that time.  As your contract date is December 2016, it will qualify for the over 12 months hold period for the discount, and so the gain will be halved and then CGT applies according to your marginal rate of tax, on that amount.
You ask if you can add any unclaimed interest and rates which occurred while you lived in the property to the market valuation.  The answer to this question is no – as it was a principal place of residence, and these items have no benefits attached.  The market value is the cost base, and it is only any expense incurred after the property becomes income producing which become allowable deductions.
As for the interest, costs associated with owning a rental property can only be claimed as a yearly deduction when the property in question is ‘available’ for rent, and your property ceased being available when the rental contract ended.  However, you may be able to account for this interest in the calculations for assessing the amount of gain – essentially they may become an addition to that cost base.  It’s important that you chat to your accountant about this, as they are qualified to know all of these little nuances of property tax law, and can guide you to ensure that your tax return is prepared legally.
Kind regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: How do I calculate capital gains on the former family home?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
While Kingston in Logan, Queensland still offers good returns, I have dealt with a number of real estate agents in the area (I have four properties there) and I've noticed they tend to accept the first offer if it is close to the asking price even, if it is the first listing day and the market is hot. I think that potentially they could get more for the vendor by waiting a little longer for multiple offers to come in. 
Each property I own I have bought through a different real estate agent and they all do the same thing. Is my fear founded that this keeps a lid on property price growth in the area?
Cheers,
Helen
Dear Helen.
One of the things that all investors must know is that the process of listing, taking offers and then conveying property from one party to another is very different in every state.  For example, in Victoria, where there is a lot of interest in a property, a vendor may call for multiple written offers from buyers and then decide on one, but this is not necessarily the case in other states.
In QLD, a real estate agent appointed to sell property for a client must keep the client informed of any significant development or issue in relation to the property(and) must immediately communicate to the client each expression of interest, whether written or oral(unless) the client has directed otherwise in writing.
This means that, as soon as an offer comes in, agents are obliged by law to present this offer to the vendor, and the vendor then decides if they will take it.  And so, it is not the agent who is 'taking' the first offer - they are merely presenting all offers to the vendor, and it is the vendor accepting them.
As all agents also have an obligation to achieve the best sales price possible for their vendor, then if you know of agents who are indeed convincing the vendor to take the first offer on the table when there is clearly the potential for further interest (as indicated by a hot market) then they are not satisfying their obligations under the terms of their contract with the vendor.  Where you have evidence that this is indeed happening with a particular agent, I advise you to approach the Department of Fair Trading in that state, with the evidence, so that it can be acted upon.  
On another note, I am a little concerned that you already own four properties in that area and seem to be seeking a fifth.  It can be common for an investor, having successfully invested in an area, to want to repeat that positive experience.  But I caution you to realise that if you own too many properties in a single market, when that market cools, as it will, everything you own will stagnate. You will also face a looming land tax bill, as once your land values in any one state exceed a certain threshold, land tax becomes payable on all other properties acquired in that state, and this can be expensive.  Diversification is a critical component of all investing strategies, and I urge you to look around for areas in other states which have future growth drivers, so that you can add some geographical diversity and also minimise your exposure to land tax as well.
Kind regards,
Margaret
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
Please not that due to the number of requests, Margaret may not be able to answer every question.
Picture: Wikimedia Commons.
</body></html>

Logan, Queensland investment overload is a concern: Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have had an investment property for the past seven years that is negatively geared in the inner Melbourne Inner East. 
The house is very old and has had numerous problems due to its age. We are looking at demolishing this house and rebuilding a new home.
 On completion of construction, our intent is to either rent it out or making this our principle place of residence (PPOR) if we can't rent it out. 
Could you please advise, if we decide to sell it in a few years' time (after we have used it as a PPOR), would we be liable for capital gains tax (CGT) or is there a sunset clause after which CGT does not apply? 
Regards,
David
Hi David
It would seem that CGT, when it applies and whether there are time limits or statutes on it, is one of the most misunderstood areas of our tax law that there is.
In your case, the property you refer to has been your investment property since around 2008, and therefore it is well within the era that CGT is charged on any property which is not your PPOR.
Being rented out is not a criteria which must apply. Whether it is rented or not, if it isn't your own home, CGT applies (unless it started out as being your own home and then you moved out). 
Under these circumstances you may qualify for the six year rule exemption, which allows you to move out for a period of up to six years and not incur any CGT if you subsequently move back in or sell.  This of course depends upon you not claiming this exemption on any other property - you can only have one exempted property at a time.
If you were to move in to this property, and had only this property on which your principal place of residence exemption was placed, it would not matter how long you stayed in it, there would still be some assessable gain for the period of time it was not your PPOR.  This is because it was an investment when you bought it and no amount of living in it can wipe this fact away.
If you go down this pathway you must keep accurate records of your purchase price and everything you spend on the property, so that pro-rated capital gains tax can be established when the time come for you to finally sell the property.
Regards,
Maragret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
Please not that due to the number of requests, Margaret may not be able to answer every question.
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Will CGT still apply if I move into my investment property?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have just purchased a house as a principle place of residence for $295,000 with $235,000 left in the mortgage and $225,000 in an offset account. 
We are using the money in the offset account (approximately $30,000) for renovations, and are looking to spend the rest on the purchase in (hopefully two) investment properties.   Do you think this is a good plan of attack or should I keep the money in the offset account and use the equity in the principle place of residence as a deposit on an investment property? 
With $30,000 on renovations hopefully I can have the house re-evaluated for $350,000. 
Kind regards,
Dave
Hi Dave, 
When investors come to my company Destiny for assistance, around 80% of them have finance structures in place that are not well thought through and which are potentially costing them some good tax deductions.
Around 20% of them are straight out incorrect, some of them using strategies which may contravene the spirit of the tax act or in other ways be a potential issue going forward.
When you buy any kind of property, be it for investment or as a principle place of residence (PPOR), you should be thinking with an holistic view – and considering what you may be wishing to achieve financially over many years, rather than just what you need at that moment in time. 
You should have a forward plan and know what level of financial independence you wish to achieve and over what time, as well as many other things such as your risk profile and current and future cash flow needs.
Then you must consult with a professional who can also assist you from a property investment advice perspective as well as getting you the loans you need – and to do this they must have some kind of qualification such as the Qualified Property Investment Advising qualification offered through <a href="https://www.pipa.asn.au">www.pipa.asn.au</a>.
Before you use the $195,000 which will remain in offset after your renovations to invest, you should first clear away all and any personal debt.  This is because such debt is non- deductible, and to use cash as a deposit for a deductible investment while you still have non- deductible debt can be a mistake. 
Then you need to be very sure that you plan to remain in your current PPOR for the duration – if you think there may be any chance that the future may bring a  desire to upgrade into a larger and more expensive home of your own, you will want to preserve your cash to use for that time. 
If you use up your available cash on an investment or two, while you can draw this back to use to buy a bigger home of your own, doing so would create a non- deductible, or personal debt which carries no deductibility.
If this all sounds confusing, this is because it is!  And so you need good guidance which considers a holistic approach to your entire financial future, not just this current home, or the immediate few properties you are ready to buy.  
Regards,
Maragret
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
Please not that due to the number of requests, Margaret may not be able to answer every question.
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Should I invest or keep in offset account?

<html><body>
Dear Margaret,
I was considering buying a two bedroom, two bathroom apartment off the plan in Newstand, Brisbane for about $650,000.  
However, there are mixed opinions about supply and demand there. Some says it is already oversupply, while others say say there is a shortage.
Do you think this is a worthwhile investment?
Regards, 
Ming
Hi Ming,
It would seem that at the moment most property investors want someone to simply tell them if they should buy a property they have seen, or not, or even just tell them where and what to buy. In asking such a question, it assumes that all investment properties are right for all investors, and nothing could be further from the truth.
Property investing is actually a very personalised thing, and what is right for one investor, may not be right for another.  While some properties simply should not be purchased at all, and some areas will never deliver anything in terms of growth, when it comes to buying property in what is thought to be an area which may have potential, there are a number of things to consider:
<ul>
<li>Risk</li>
</ul>
All property types will carry different levels of risk to each other and each investor should consider whether their own risk profile matches the level of risk each property type presents to them. 
For example, a serviced apartment in a tourist destination would be considered to carry a lot more risk than a three bed house in the Brisbane suburbs. Further, that serviced apartment would present a lower risk to a person with a large portfolio of properties, and plenty of personal cash flow than it would to the one who has a tight personal budget, and a complete reliance on that property delivering weekly income, and growing. 
The investor with the large portfolio can afford for it not to work out, while the other investor might have their entire financial future changed by just this one property if it works out badly.
<ul>
<li>Cash Flow</li>
</ul>
Some properties deliver better cash flow than others, and some investors can withstand higher levels of negative cash flow than others can.
The cash flow of any property you buy must be one which you have established you can manage – and you must build in a margin for lower than expected cash flows to cover times when vacancies may be higher than anticipated.
<ul>
<li>Capital Growth</li>
</ul>
The investor with the large portfolio can afford it if one or two properties stagnate and do not grow, while the newer investor, particularly if they have low equity in their own home, must have a property with more assurance of growth.  While there are no guarantees of growth anywhere, it’s commonly known that some areas have characteristics which assure at least some growth over time (like suburbs of a capital city) while others may experience fabulous growth, or none at all (or even a loss, such as in some mining towns).
And so, in direct answer to your question, while Newstead definitely possesses characteristics which demonstrate that it has what it takes to grow and deliver a decent cash flow, there are concerns over the short term supply factor.
In the event that the developments keep being approved, the supply will grow faster than the demand, and, in the short-term at least, prices may stagnate.  Given the strong fundamentals of the area, this oversupply will eventually work its way out, but no one can tell you with any certainty when this will happen – and so you must determine the level of risk that this presents, to you.
Kind regards,
Margaret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
Please not that due to the number of requests, Margaret may not be able to answer every question.
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Will buying off the plan in Brisbane be a worthwhile investment?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I’m looking to buy my first investment property. I already have my own home which we have a fair bit of equity in. We will use that equity to finance the next deposit. 
Do we have to have access to that equity to put down as a deposit at contract signing? Or can we sign a contract with 100% of the purchase value subject to finance?
Regards,
Samuel
Hi Samuel,
First of all, congratulations on being ready to take this first step!  As it is likely you may be looking for an investment property anywhere in Australia, its important that you understand the differences which exist in every state in terms of how a property is transacted and the procedure for deposits.
First of all, the deposit required in every state, and when it is paid, is different. For example, in NSW, the deposit is either made in the form of a non-refundable 0.25% of the purchase price upon acceptance of the offer (to secure it and protect you from being gazumped), with the balance of 10% of the purchase price being required five days later (at which time the contract becomes unconditional), or as a straight 10% when you are ready make your contract unconditional (but in the meantime someone else can buy it).
In complete contrast, a QLD purchase attracts an initial deposit of whatever you can negotiate (I always suggest $1,000 and this is refundable)  with a ‘balance deposit’ (again I suggest a further $9,000) to be paid upon the contract becoming unconditional.  In between those two extremes falls the other states, and you must become familiar with each state’s individual process before you even begin to find your investment.
In any event, a deposit of some type is usually paid, and in your case, the entire amount of your deposit is tied up as equity in other property.  While you can use your own cash to make a deposit, this is not advised.  This is because if you use your own cash, you cannot subsequently ‘repay’ yourself from the loan you get to buy the property, as this payment to you is considered by the tax office to be a personal payment.  It then loses the ability for the interest incurred on this amount to be claimed as a deduction.  It’s important to preserve the nexus between a payment and the property, and the only way to do that is to ensure loan funds are spent directly on the property or its expenses.
You have two ways that you can get to this deposit and still maintain full deductibility without using your own cash:
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-one.jpg" alt="">You can approach the lender even before you find a property and set up a ‘line of credit’ loan using your current property equity.  This line of credit loan then sits undrawn, and the moment you find a property it is available for you to draw from to make the deposit.  As long as the funds from this debt are only ever used for, and connected to, an investment property, they are fully deductible.  There is a multitude of ways you can do this:
<ul>
<li>you can make it as large as your equity allows, use it for deposits every time you buy a new property, obtaining an 80% loan against any new property when you settle it (and so your 20% and costs comes from the line of credit to add to this 80% loan), 
</li>
<li>you can apply for only enough for the deposit, and then apply for a loan increase to be effected when the property settles and can be taken as security, or, 
</li>
<li>if you have enough equity in your own home, you can just put in place a loan big enough to buy the whole property – drawing the funds up as needed to pay deposits, costs and the final payment.</li>
</ul>
<img src="/images/2014/07/04/yellow-two.jpg" alt="">You can instead get a deposit bond.  This is an insurance policy of sorts, which guarantees to the vendor that, if you renege and do not proceed with the purchase, your forfeited deposit will be paid by them.  A deposit bond has a fee which is often less than the interest on the deposit would be if you were to use loan funds, but be warned – while the insurance company pays the forfeited deposit they still chase you to get it back!  This is only of concern if you withdraw from the purchase after your contract has become unconditional.
Whatever you decide, it’s important to get guidance from a qualified person who can be sure you structure this correctly, as getting it wrong can be a tax nightmare.  It’s also important that, before you even get started, you become educated – do a lot of reading and find a great property investment course to do first!
Have a property question?   <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: How can I use my house's equity to finance my first investment?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I just read your recent reply on <a href="/news">moving out of your home and the capital gain tax that may come with it</a>.
Wonder if you could help me with this.
Just to clarify, if I stayed in my home for three years and if I sell it 10 years after moving out from it, and I have no other home, I would have to pay 4/13 of the net captital gain (method one)?
Can I get a valuation after the six years is up an calculate the gain from that date and pay tax on the difference (method two)?
I think the Australian Tax Office (ATO) website seems to deal with method one. Is method two also possible?  My six years is up in a years time and I am contemplating whether to sell since I live overseas.
Regards,
Shanthi
Hi Shanthi,
This part of the tax rules can be very confusing - and can be really hard to wrap your head around.  Where tax is concerned its really important that you contact an accountant, tell him or her your exact situation and tell him or her just how the rules apply to you, and what you will pay.
I have checked with Ian Rodrigues, my Property Success team member and tax specialist, and we talked your situation through.
You can choose to treat a property as your main residence even after you move out provided you do not choose another property as a main residence during that period and it is not rented.  This means that, if you didn’t own anything else, and you didn’t rent out this property, you can keep the main residence exemption on it indefinitely and pay no capital gains tax.
If it is rented out, however, the maximum period you can treat it as your main residence after you move out is six years.  You can move back in during the six years and the six year period will reset. If you continue to own the property after the six year period has expired,  you only get a partial exemption.
In your example, if you lived in it for three years, and then rented it for 10 years, you would have to pay capital gains tax on 4/13th of the gain.
You can't use a valuation after the six years for the basis of calculating the capital gain , but you are able to use a valuation at the date it ceased to be your main residence.  In your case, this was three years after you purchased it. The capital gain would  then be calculated as 4/10th of any gain over that market value.
You will need to get a qualified valuer to provide you that retrospective valuation if you don't have one from that time - the ATO is unlikely to accept a market opinion from a real estate agent where no valuing qualifications are held.
Again I stress that you should discuss this with an accountant who has a good grasp of capital gains tax and main residence exemptions.
Have a property question?   <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Ask Margaret

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News