<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> has revealed plans for a new mixed-use tower at 10 Dangar Street, Wickham, advancing a proposal that would reshape the southern gateway to Newcastle’s city centre with one of the city’s tallest residential buildings.

The State Significant Development proposal, now on exhibition, seeks approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bowline-10-dangar-street-wickham-nsw-2293">43-storey tower</a> immediately adjacent to the Newcastle Interchange. The project would deliver around 200 apartments, including 42 affordable housing dwellings, alongside 99 co-living units, a 171-room hotel, retail space, and new public domain integrated through the site.

The scheme marks a significant escalation of plans previously approved for the site. Urban Property Group took over the prominent 2,904 sqm parcel, where excavation and demolition had already commenced under an earlier consent for a 14-storey mixed-use development.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="58a96dd9-407f-4d20-86b4-94e4bfeef74b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20podium.png?VersionId=LGlf08pdFGAZDzvx_CXC4XakHNZRuEE0" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/sjb-architects">SJB</a>, the tower has been conceived as a landmark transit-oriented development anchored to the Newcastle Interchange precinct. The proposal includes 245 build-to-sell apartments across a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom residences, as well as two penthouses. Fifteen apartments and one operational unit are earmarked for NDIS housing. The co-living component would add a further 99 units, while the podium would accommodate retail uses and hotel facilities.

SJB said the site presents “a valuable opportunity to anchor the precinct by setting the standard for design, active ground planes and character at the key southern gateway.”

The architecture responds directly to the site’s position beside major transport infrastructure and within one of Newcastle’s fastest-evolving urban renewal precincts. The tower form sits above a sculpted podium designed to frame new public spaces, including a through-site pedestrian link connecting Station Street to Hannell Street, landscaped plazas, and activated retail edges.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a7bd6ff0-f7db-4ce8-a6dc-ea56e72c6149" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20lanne.png?VersionId=xzf39VADyhj7zBQY2I9fx9vI62u2tuSb" />

The design report describes the project as part of the broader transition of Wickham into “a vibrant, high-quality mixed-use urban precinct” that leverages proximity to the station, open space, and regional connectivity.

A detailed public art strategy has also been prepared for the development. The strategy positions the project as “a transit-oriented development of state significance at the gateway to Newcastle’s city centre” and outlines a series of integrated artworks responding to Newcastle’s industrial and transport heritage.

Creative Road’s curatorial framework for the project, titled Unveil, draws on “stratified surfaces, carved volumes, and light-filled apertures” while referencing Newcastle’s transformation from an industrial city into a contemporary education and technology hub.

<img alt="First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s next supertower at Wickham interchange" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="77a882bb-14b1-4d28-99ff-9438e39508c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/wickham%20site.png?VersionId=cevgo_vN0eKPK78P8YcEu3mKPLkpFqE7" />

The proposal is being advanced through the NSW Housing Delivery Authority pathway after being declared State Significant Development in June 2025. The accompanying scoping report states the development aims to “maximise the site’s proximity to the Newcastle Interchange by delivering transit-oriented development” while increasing housing supply and affordable housing provision within the Newcastle LGA.

Urban Property Group’s plans align with the long-term strategic vision established under the Wickham Master Plan, which identified the interchange precinct as suitable for substantial uplift in height and density. The current proposal would significantly intensify that vision, positioning the tower among the tallest developments proposed for Newcastle.

The site sits immediately north of the Newcastle Interchange, bounded by Dangar Street, Hannell Street, and Charles Street. It is surrounded by a rapidly growing cluster of residential towers and mixed-use projects that have emerged following the completion of the light rail and transport interchange.

Joel Robinson

First look: Urban Property Group unveils Newcastle’s latest tower at Wickham interchange

Bottega House has completed settlement of a landmark riverfront site in Macquarie Street, St Lucia, representing its first major Brisbane development.&nbsp;

Positioned on the banks of the Brisbane River, the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/180-macquarie-street-st-lucia-qld-4067">premium site at 180 Macquarie Street</a> features uninterrupted river frontage in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held residential precincts.&nbsp;

The proposed development, currently under assessment with Brisbane City Council, has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a> with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/mim-design">Mim Design</a> and will deliver a boutique collection of premium residences positioned specifically for owner occupiers and downsizers.&nbsp;

The residences are set to redefine luxury apartment living in the area, with a focus on architectural quality, refined finishes, landscape integration and elevated amenities including curated wellness facilities, resort-style pools and recreation spaces rarely seen in the local market.&nbsp;

Exclusive sales for the project will be led by Keenan &amp; Byrne, ahead of an anticipated launch later this year.&nbsp;

Bottega House Managing Director Nick Malloch said the project reflects the group’s ambition to deliver a highly curated residential offering within one of Brisbane’s most tightly held precincts.&nbsp;

“This is an incredibly rare riverfront opportunity and one we have approached with a long-term perspective,” Malloch said.&nbsp;

“Our vision from the outset was to create a boutique collection of residences that feel more like private homes than traditional apartments, with generous proportions, refined finishes and exceptional amenity throughout."

Malloch says there is a&nbsp;lack of premium owner-occupier stock of this quality in the market, particularly for downsizers wanting space, privacy and a true lifestyle offering without compromise.&nbsp;

"Demand is expected to be strong given the scarcity of premium riverfront opportunities of this nature within Brisbane’s inner-west."&nbsp;

Bottega House secures landmark riverfront site in St Lucia 

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-6" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-2" dir="auto">
<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-2" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:5a5ab36c-8dd3-454c-b456-c501f22f0eb4-0" dir="auto">
The arrival of the first piling rig officially marks the commencement of construction at SIERA’s new beachside apartment development, Exhale, in Northcliffe.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/exhale-surfers-paradise-8-enderley-avenue-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Exhale</a>, a glass-encased tower featuring 54 large-scale apartments at 8 Enderley Avenue, is SIERA’s third Gold Coast development. It follows the recently completed PIPIS Bilinga beachfront project, which achieved suburb-record prices, and the soon-to-be-completed Chevron Island development, Tapestry.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359603]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/siera">SIERA</a> Founder and Managing Director Brent Thompson said the arrival of the piling rig represented a significant milestone for the development, which is scheduled for completion in late 2028.

Over the next month, around 260 piles are expected to be installed as work progresses on the basement structure. The building is anticipated to rise above ground level early next year, before unveiling its sculptural glass curtain wall, developed in collaboration with specialist façade engineers.

“The façade was designed to maximise panoramic coastal views while creating a distinctive architectural identity,” Thompson said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=355935]

Designed by BDA Architecture, Exhale will comprise just 54 two- and three-bedroom residences across 26 levels, a level of low-density living rarely delivered in this beachside pocket between Surfers Paradise and Broadbeach.

The project has been conceived as a resident-only building, with no short-stay accommodation permitted. SIERA says the model is intended to appeal to long-term owner-occupiers rather than transient holiday demand.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=361052]

Residences have been designed with large-format layouts and expansive glazing, with most apartments featuring more than 30 metres of glass frontage to maximise natural light and ocean views.

The amenity offering spans two levels and centres on wellness and lifestyle, including a heated magnesium pool, sauna, yoga and Pilates studio, gymnasium, private dining facilities, cinema lounge, and dedicated surfcraft storage.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112661 project_image_fid=359607]

More than half of the apartments have already sold. SIERA has also opened a sales gallery for Exhale at its Chevron Island commercial premises, near its Tapestry tower and the site of its second Chevron Island apartment development, which is slated to launch in early 2027.
</section>
</section>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112661]

SIERA kicks off construction at Northcliffe tower Exhale

Local Little Bay residents, along with buyers from premium postcodes across Sydney’s affluent Eastern Suburbs, have dominated purchases in developer-builder Urban Property Group’s first Eastern Suburbs apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a>.

The $250 million coastal project, one of the first new developments in the area in several years, has proven particularly popular with downsizers, especially those from Coogee and Bondi. One Double Bay downsizer paid $4.7 million for a four-bedroom penthouse, setting a new local apartment price record in the process.

Buyers have been attracted to the combination of coastal tranquillity, premium design and amenity-rich neighbourhood living. The walkable village setting, along with proximity to three of Sydney’s leading golf courses, New South Wales Golf Club, St Michael’s Golf Club and The Coast Golf Club, has also been a key drawcard.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352689]

Built across two low-rise buildings designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hill-thalis-architecture-urban-projects-pty-ltd">Hill Thalis</a> and set along a lush, landscaped green spine, designed by leading landscape architect <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>, ESTE Little Bay offers a collection of one, two, three and four-bedroom residences with interiors by Richards Stanisich.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/urban-property-group">Urban Property Group</a> Sales Director, Tom McIvor said the response to ESTE has been "nothing short of extraordinary."

“Buyers have been quick to recognise ESTE as a rare opportunity to invest in a coastal sanctuary that offers both seclusion and connectivity to the heart of Sydney,” McIvor said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352687]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">SRM Residential</a> Senior Director, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/srm-residential">Clayton Ross</a> said the local market has responded incredibly well, driven by ESTE’s exceptional location and the rarity it offers.

“We’ve seen strong interest from a variety of buyer groups, all of whom are drawn to the exclusivity and quality of the build and construction by the 4.5-star iCIRT-rated builder / developer, Urban Property Group. There’s truly nothing else like it along Sydney’s coastline.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112343 project_image_fid=352690]

The project also includes robust buyer protections, including Resilience Insurance’s Latent Defects Insurance, providing 10 years of structural cover, and an independent iCIRT-rating of the developer.

“The iCIRT-rating adds another layer of confidence,” Ross added. “Buyers see it as a safeguard for their investment and their lifestyle.” A highlight of ESTE’s offering is its exclusive wellness amenities, including a heated rooftop infinity pool and outdoor heated spa, a state-of-the-art Technogym fitness centre, and a sauna.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/este-little-bay-jennifer-street-little-bay-nsw-2036">ESTE Little Bay</a> is topped out and is on track to complete towards the end of 2026, with residents moving in before Christmas.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112343]

Eastern Suburbs buyers snap up ESTE Little Bay apartments

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sunland-group">Sunland Group</a> has officially lodged plans for its first Gold Coast apartment project since the departure of the Abedian family from the company three years ago, unveiling a new high-rise proposal for a prominent Broadbeach corner site on Old Burleigh Road.

The application was submitted by an entity directed by Tom Jamieson, stepson of longtime Sunland leader Soheil Abedian, and Riaz Rezvanipour, brother-in-law of Sahba Abedian, Soheil’s son.

Sunland acquired the 1,283 sqm site on the corner of Old Burleigh Road and Armrick Avenue for $9.5 million late last year and is now seeking approval for a <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/99-101-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">42-storey tower with 81 apartments</a>.

<img alt="First look: Sunland Group returns to Broadbeach with new Old Burleigh Road tower plans" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="fea2946d-90ee-4cfc-babe-2a8ad5db2cb6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/pers.png?VersionId=BV0fihJw31nDIQ8ozY_h3GbS8mxDyhnm" />

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/contreras-earl-architecture">Contreras Earl Architecture</a>, the proposed tower at 99-101 Old Burleigh Road would deliver a predominantly larger-format apartment mix aimed at the owner-occupier market. Plans include 17 two-bedroom apartments, 55 three-bedroom apartments, and nine four-bedroom residences across 35 residential levels.

The development also incorporates three basement levels, four podium parking levels, two levels of communal recreation facilities, and rooftop plant and equipment. A total of 189 car spaces are proposed, significantly exceeding the 90 spaces required under the planning scheme.

The architecture adopts a sculpted, curvilinear form, with deep wraparound balconies and integrated landscaping intended to soften the tower’s vertical expression. The planning report states the building’s “slender footprint/form provides a complimentary yet varied built form within the local streetscape” and contributes to “a varied, yet ordered skyline.”

Contreras Earl noted in its Architectural Statement that from the early stages, the project addressed a fundamental challenge: how to accommodate the required residential yield while avoiding the conventional model of a tower sitting on a rigid, fully resolved parking podium.

“The most direct response would have been to consolidate parking into a singular, flat podium and extrude a repetitive tower above,” the statement said. “While efficient, this approach would result in a consolidated built form with limited engagement with the surrounding landscape and public realm.”

Instead, the conventional podium model was “deliberately rejected”. The architects described the base of the building as “a landscaped architectural condition where structure, planting and circulation are integrated”.

“Rather than presenting a continuous built mass, the base of the building is articulated through a series of concrete planter elements that organise the podium into a fragmented system,” the statement said. “This approach reduces the perceived bulk of the lower levels while establishing a more permeable interface with the streetscape and adjacent open space.”

<img alt="Sunland" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="923fad8d-c960-4527-8fbe-975cf1ddf88d" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-25%20at%2010.32.03%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=pngwb0hYOIUpq9vDw6F2EsOiVuHF3DiX" />

&nbsp;

The site sits within the High Density Residential Zone and inside the City of Gold Coast’s unrestricted “HX” building height area, where the planning framework anticipates intensified residential development tied to the expanding light rail corridor. The planning report notes the area is undergoing “transition toward more intense development forms” given its proximity to Broadbeach, Surfers Paradise, and high-frequency public transport infrastructure.

Positioned directly opposite Broadbeach Park and within walking distance of Florida Gardens light rail station, the development would sit among a rapidly evolving stretch of Old Burleigh Road that has become one of the Gold Coast’s most active apartment development corridors.

The application joins a growing pipeline of luxury residential projects reshaping Broadbeach, including nearby developments by 5Point Projects, Polycell, and Graya.

The planning report argues the project contributes toward the Gold Coast’s long-term housing targets under the South East Queensland Regional Plan, which forecasts the need for more than 100,000 additional high-rise dwellings across the city by 2046.

<section data-scroll-anchor="false" data-testid="conversation-turn-4" data-turn="assistant" data-turn-id="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-1" data-turn-id-container="request-WEB:84a2af5e-d7cf-4ddf-922a-f4d44d6c6caa-1" dir="auto">
The Abedian family departed Sunland Group in late 2023, ending a four-decade association with the company, and subsequently established the private development firm Abedian &amp; Co. The group is currently delivering <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/greenmount-residences-cnr-hill-street-and-marine-parade-coolangatta-qld-4225">Greenmount Residences</a> at Rainbow Bay and recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/18-mary-avenue-14-18-mary-avenue-broadbeach-qld-4218">18 Mary Avenue</a> in Broadbeach.
</section>

First look: Sunland Group returns to Broadbeach new apartment market with new Old Burleigh Road tower plans

Asic

<html><body>
A broken mortgage broker remuneration model and loose lending could trigger a subprime mortgage crisis, according to the the outgoing chief of the Australia’s corporate regulator.
Australian Securities and Investments Commission chairman Greg Medcraft said the situation in Australia was not comparable to the US subprime mortgage crisis, but said Australia should learn lessons from what happened in the United States.
Earlier this week, a UBS report said the amount of home loans extended based on "factually inaccurate" information is estimated to have reached $500 billion.
Medcraft said observations in the UBS report were consistent with ASIC's findings on responsible lending.
"It is amazing how people keep saying, 'It couldn't happen here'," Medcraft was cited as saying at a Reuters Newsmaker event by The Australian Financial Review.
"Thinking about the subprime crisis, [the] big issues were basically the issue of overstatement of income, understatement of expenses and overstatement of property values."
Factually incorrect mortgages on the banks' books were known as "liar loans" during the global financial crisis.
The UBS report suggested more borrowers were lying by under-representing their expenses and living costs. Borrowers were also over-stating income and assets and understating loans.
It said the level of liar loans meant the impact on the broader economy from a housing downturn was likely to be more severe than anticipated by the banks.
However, Finance Brokers Association of Australia labelled the UBS analysis "reckless" because the analysis was not based on UBS data or data from a bank or a lender.
In 2015, ASIC reviewed interest-only home loans and found 11 lenders, including the big four banks, had to change their home lending practices because they fell short of their responsible lending obligations.
The ASIC found that a majority of the lenders relied on indices to estimate the living expenses of borrowers rather than assess borrowers' actual living expenses.
In March, the regulator took Westpac to court, alleging the mortgage lender failed to properly assess whether potential borrowers could repay their home loans.
Medcraft said there could be more court cases of a similar nature in future.
He said irresponsible lending is facilitated because of the mortgage broker remuneration model which rewards brokers for securing larger loans for their clients.
"The mortgage commission is based on [the model] the larger their loans, the more you get. So logically what would you do?
"It's human behaviour. I'd do it," he said.
He said problematic aspects of the mortgage broker remuneration model included volume rebates, which are bonuses paid to brokers based on the overall volume of home loan sales.
 “Soft dollar" benefits, such as brokers' membership to loyalty programmes run by lenders which gives brokers improved service, were also a problem. 
The increased regulatory scrutiny has forced banks to tighten their lending practices in the past few months. 
In July, National Australia Bank has introduced tougher credit controls on new loans and reassessed its appetite for risk as household debt blows out to record highs.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

'Liar loans' could spark mortgage crisis, says ASIC chief Greg Medcraft 

<html><body>
Westpac’s dispute with the markets regulator over lending practices has brought into focus the limitations of indexes for assessing mortgage applications.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission had launched civil proceedings earlier this year against the second largest mortgage lender alleging that between December 2011 and March 2015 Westpac failed to properly assess whether borrowers could meet their repayment obligations before entering into home loan contracts.
The bank has denied the claims.
ASIC alleges that Westpac relied on an index, University of Melbourne's Household Expenditure Measure (HEM), to help determine how much to lend to would-be borrowers.
In court filings, ASIC said the HEM benchmark was based on "conservative" estimates of household expenditure”, according to The Australian Financial Review.
The benchmark "represents only an estimate of what Australian families consume" and "was not compiled by reference to expenditure data collected during the relevant period", it said. 
Westpac relied on HEM benchmarks based on data from 2009-10 to assess borrowers for loans that were issued between December 2011 and March 2015, it said adding that the bank only "scaled" the benchmark to account for the location of applicants, number of dependents and marital status. It should have taken into account the total household income, net wealth decile, savings pattern and number of credit cards per household, according to the ASIC.
The National Credit Act provides consumer protections to ensure that credit providers make reasonable inquiries about a borrower's financial situation and assess whether a loan contract will be unsuitable for the borrowers.
Westpac said the court action did not concern any current lending policies or practices.
The bank has defended the HEM benchmark as an "objective measure that does not depend on the quality of a consumer's estimation of their expenses ... [and] excludes discretionary non-basic expenses that a consumer could reduce to meet their commitments without substantial hardship".
Westpac head of consumer banking, George Frazis, has said earlier its assessment processes are comprehensive and take into account a customer’s specific circumstances, including income and expenditure, previous repayments' history and the overall customer relationship.
The bank did not rely solely on the HEM benchmark, Frazis said in a statement in March after the case went to court in March.
"In our experience this survey is a useful input into our loan assessment process, in combination with our understanding of customers' circumstances."
ASIC's statement of claim describes the circumstances of seven loans.
Westpac has previously said all borrowers are up to date with their repayments.
Regulators, include APRA, have been clamping down on banks’ lending practices in recent months to cool the property markets on the East Coast.
Of the major banks, Westpac has the largest proportion of loans made on interest-only terms, reflecting a book weighted towards property investors.
It also asked mortgage brokers to grill clients on why they want an interest-only loan.
Bright Corporate Law principal David Jacobson told the AFR benchmarks like HEM were widely used.
"But they have moved in the last few years to be a cross-check against declared individual expenses rather than a standard default amount to be used as a substitute for getting that information," he said. "In other words, if the information obtained shows declared expenses are lower than the benchmark then the lender needs to get more information.
"But if the declared expenses are higher than the benchmark, lenders calculate affordability on the declared expenses, subject to any other queries or inconsistencies." 
</body></html>

Westpac, ASIC court battle over responsible lending heats up

<html><body>
The former Principal of Sherwin Financial Planners Pty Ltd and Chairman of Wickham Securities Ltd has today pleaded guilty to 25 charges brought by ASIC, arising out of the collapse of his financial planning business.
Bradley Thomas Sherwin, 62, of Everton Hills, Queensland, appeared in the Brisbane District Court, and pleaded guilty to:
<ul>
<li>twenty four counts of dishonestly causing a detriment between May 2009 and December 2012 to the value of nearly $10 million to a number of clients of Sherwin Financial Planners; and</li>
<li>one count of dishonestly breaching his duties as a director of Wickham Securities Limited between June 2010 and October 2010.</li>
</ul>
Mr Sherwin will be sentenced on 14 November 2017.  Mr Sherwin did not apply for bail and was remanded in custody.
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter.
Wickham Securities collapsed in December 2012, owing more than $27 million to approximately 300 debenture holders. 
Sherwin Financial Planners and other companies of which Mr Sherwin was a director collapsed in January 2013, owing more than $30 million to clients of Sherwin Financial Planners.
In May 2016, ASIC permanently banned Mr Sherwin from providing financial services.
In September 2016, the former Chief Executive Officer of Wickham Securities, Garth Peter Robertson, was sentenced to 5 years imprisonment after pleading guilty to various charged brought by ASIC, including fraud.
In June 2013, ASIC cancelled the registration of the auditor of Wickham Securities, Brian Kingston, after forming the view he failed to carry out or perform adequately and properly the duties of an auditor.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Principal of Sherwin Financial Planners pleads guilty to fraud

<html><body>
Television personality Shelley Craft has appeared in a video series from ASIC to help consumers make better decisions when buying a home.
The five videos feature tips on the key decisions involved with a buying a home including:
<ul>
<li>How to get a home loan;  </li>
<li>Working out how much you can afford with a mortgage;</li>
<li>Saving to buy a home;  </li>
<li>Understanding the hidden costs of buying a home and;</li>
<li>Being a guarantor for a home loan.</li>
</ul>
Peter Kell, ASIC's Deputy Chairman said for many people, buying a home is likely to be their biggest investment.
"We encourage home buyers to take the time to understand their individual financial position and be aware of what they are committing to with a home loan. And it is always a good idea to shop around for the best deal', he said.
"It can be challenging to build a home deposit, a good place to start is to create a budget to understand how much you can comfortably afford to save, borrow and repay.
"ASIC's MoneySmart offers a range of useful calculators and resources, including the savings goals and mortgage calculators, to help Australians take control of their money and reach their savings goals.
Shelley Craft said buying a home is full of excitement but it can also be stressful, especially the financial aspects.
"it's important to take your time, consider all your options and be sure to ask lots of questions, so you understand what you're signing up for," she said.
Don't rely on just one source when you're shopping around for a home loan because saving even half a percent on the interest rate can save you thousands of dollars over tim"', added Ms Craft.
To see ASIC's financial tips for home buyers visit <a href="https://goo.gl/pWsabK" target="_blank">ASIC's MoneySmart website</a>.
</body></html>

Television's Shelley Craft hosts MoneySmart tips for home buyers

<html><body>
ASIC has disqualified Ross Russo of New South Wales from being an approved self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) auditor.
ASIC determined that Mr Russo had breached fundamental independence and audit requirements.
Given the nature of these breaches, it was considered appropriate to disqualify Mr Russo.
ASIC found that Mr Russo had breached:
<ul>
<li>auditor independence requirements of APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, where he audited the fund of a close family member;</li>
<li>audit evidence requirements of Australian auditing standards.　</li>
</ul>
ASIC Commissioner John Price said, “SMSF auditors play a fundamental role in promoting confidence in the SMSF sector so it is crucial that they adhere to ethical and professional standards. ASIC will continue to take action where the conduct of SMSF auditors is inadequate.”
SMSF trustees and members can check whether their auditor is registered, or whether a person has been disqualified, by searching ASIC's SMSF auditor register at <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/connectonline.asic.gov.au" target="_blank">connectonline.asic.gov.au</a>
Information about Mr Russo was referred to ASIC by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) under section 128P of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (the SIS Act).
From 1 July 2013, the SIS Act required all auditors of SMSFs to be registered with ASIC.
This was to ensure that all SMSF auditors meet the base standards of competency and expertise.
ASIC and the ATO work closely together as co-regulators of SMSF auditors.
The ATO monitors SMSF auditor conduct and may refer matters to ASIC for possible action such as disqualification or suspension of their registration.
</body></html>

SMSF auditor disqualified by ASIC

<html><body>
ASIC has permanently banned former financial adviser Neil Bruce Trower from providing any financial services.
Mr Trower is a former representative of Millennium 3 Financial Services Pty Ltd (M3), and a former employee of Lifestyle Financial Services (Qld) Pty Ltd a corporate representative of M3, who provided risk advice from the outer Brisbane suburb of Cashmere.
M3 is the holder of an Australian financial services licence and is ultimately owned by Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ).
ASIC found that between August 2015 and December 2015, Mr Trower had:
<ul>
<li>not complied with a financial services law by failing to give a number of his clients a Statement of Advice, as required, at the time he provided them with oral financial advice; and</li>
<li>applied the signatures of a number of clients to both internal and external documents for the purpose of passing an internal compliance audit.</li>
</ul>
Further, ASIC found Mr Trower's conduct to be dishonest, as he did not tell the affected clients that he had applied their signatures to documents.
He submitted these documents to the internal audit team knowing that the team would rely on the documents as being genuine during the conduct of the audit.
The M3 audit team identified the signature irregularities during an internal audit of Mr Trower's files and reported them to ASIC.
ASIC Deputy Chairman Peter Kell said, "Certain compliance requirements are in place for advisers to ensure they are meeting their obligations to clients, and to ensure they act honestly and with integrity.
"Anyone whose conduct falls short of these standards will be removed from the financial services industry."
Mr Trower has the right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of ASIC's decision.
The banning of Mr Trower is part of ASIC's Wealth Management Project. The Wealth Management Project was established in October 2014 to lift the standards of major financial advice providers.
The Wealth Management Project focuses on the conduct of the largest financial advice firms (NAB, Westpac, CBA, ANZ, Macquarie and AMP).
ASIC's work in the Wealth Management Project covers a number of areas including:
<ul>
<li>working with the largest financial advice firms to address the identification and remediation of non-compliant advice; and</li>
<li>seeking regulatory outcomes, where appropriate, against licensees and advisers.</li>
</ul>
As part of its Wealth Management Project, ASIC has banned 38 advisers from the financial services industry.
Two adviser bannings are the subject of appeals.
</body></html>

ASIC bans former Cashmere, Brisbane financial adviser over fake signatures

<html><body>
Jana Jaros and Jackson Laurence Malcolm Capper have appeared in the Southport Magistrates Court on charges of operating an unlicensed financial services business following an ASIC investigation.
ASIC documents state Ms Jaros and Mr Capper have been charged under section 911A of the Corporations Act for allegedly aiding and abetting Astra Group Pty Ltd and Old Cambridge Pty Ltd to carry on a financial services business without holding an Australian Financial Services licence.
They also face two charges each under section 1308(2) of the Corporations Act for lodging with ASIC documents containing false or misleading material.
Providing assistance to operate an unlicensed financial services business carries a potential maximum penalty of $36,000 or two years' imprisonment or both, while providing false or misleading documents carries a maximum penalty of $36,000 or five years' imprisonment or both.
This matter is being prosecuted by the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.
Ms Jaros and Mr Capper appeared on 7 August 2017. The matter was adjourned until 4 September 2017.
Background
ASIC alleges that Ms Jaros and Mr Caper set up the websites www.investradirect.com and later www.investradirect.co to attract and service clients of Astra Group Pty Ltd and Old Cambridge Pty Ltd.
</body></html>

Operators of unlicensed Gold Coast financial services business charged

<html><body>
Nicholas Ellis, an accountant and former financial adviser from Valentine, New South Wales, has pleaded guilty in the Downing Centre District Court in Sydney to two charges of making false or misleading statements to obtain money from clients and fraudulent misappropriation of client funds, respectively.
Following an ASIC investigation, Mr Ellis admitted that between about 23 March 2009 and about 18 July 2009 he:
- sent 10 letters and one email to a number of his clients for the purpose of raising investment funds from them to purchase a hotel in Tura, New South Wales through his company, Tura Pty Limited. The letters and email contained false and misleading statements in relation to the purchase of the hotel
- he fraudulently misappropriated over $500,000 of client funds received by Tura Pty Limited for his own purposes.
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions is prosecuting the matter.
Mr Ellis pleaded guilty to the charges on 4 August 2017. The matter has been set down for a sentence hearing at the NSW District Court on 26 April 2018.
ASIC banned Mr Ellis in 2013 from providing financial services for a period of 6 years for other conduct
Background
The maximum term of imprisonment for each charge is:
<ul>
<li>S178BB  of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (obtaining money etc by false and misleading statements): 5 years;</li>
<li>S178A  of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) - (fraudulent misappropriation), 7 years.</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

jrobinson-rf4aSBido9

Valentine accountant pleads guilty to fraudulent misappropriation in client Tura hotel deal 

<html><body>
ASIC has brought two charges against Mr Shane Thompson, of New Gisborne, Victoria, has appeared in the Bendigo Magistrates' Court on two charges brought by ASIC that he forged financial planning documents.
ASIC alleges that between 27 December 2012 and 1 March 2013, Mr Thompson completed 22 false client change of adviser forms and submitted them to MLC Ltd to transfer National Australia Bank (NAB) clients to his personal financial planning client list.
ASIC alleges that Mr Thompson forged client signatures on each form and undertook this process without clients' knowledge or authorisation so that he could receive additional financial planning remuneration from his employer, the NAB.
At a hearing on 31 July 2017, the matter was adjourned for a plea hearing in the Melbourne Magistrates Court on 26 October 2017.
The Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) is prosecuting the matter.
<h2>Background</h2>
Mr Thompson was employed by the NAB as a financial planner during the time the alleged misconduct took place.
Mr Thompson has been charged under sections 83A(1) and 83A(2) of the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic). The maximum penalty for each offence is ten years imprisonment.
ASIC has previously banned Mr Thompson from providing financial services and credit activities for seven years.
Wealth Management Project
This outcome is a result of ASIC's Wealth Management Project. The Wealth Management Project was established in October 2014 with the objective of lifting standards by major financial advice providers. The Wealth Management Project focuses on the conduct of the largest financial advice firms (NAB, Westpac, CBA, ANZ, AMP and Macquarie).
ASIC's work in the Wealth Management Project covers a number of areas including:
<ul>
<li>working with the largest financial advice firms to address the identification and remediation of non-compliant advice; and</li>
<li>seeking regulatory outcomes when appropriate against licensees and advisers.</li>
</ul>
As part of its Wealth Management Project, ASIC has banned 35 advisers from the financial services industry (two advisers have current appeals before the Administrative Appeals Tribunal).
</body></html>

Former NAB adviser charged with forging documents 

<html><body>
ASIC has started legal action in the Federal Court in Melbourne to wind up a land banking scheme known as the Realestate Equity Investment Trust (REIT) and an associated company, Timeline Project Management Pty Ltd (Timeline).
The REIT scheme owns land located at Flinders Avenue in Lara, Victoria.
ASIC understands that at least 82 investors have invested a total of at least $800,000 into the REIT scheme and that, since 2013, investors have been making payments in respect of their investment to Timeline.
Lotus Pty Ltd (in liquidation) was the responsible entity which managed the REIT scheme until 21 September 2016 at which time its Australian financial services licence was cancelled by ASIC for various compliance breaches.
It was placed into liquidation on 14 December 2016, on the application of a creditor.
ASIC alleges that REIT is operating as a managed investment scheme in circumstances where it has no responsible entity and no reasonable prospects of obtaining one.
The matter is listed for hearing at the Federal Court in Melbourne on 4 August, 2017 at 9.30am.
These proceedings are part of ASIC's wider and ongoing investigation into land banking schemes.
1. What steps has ASIC taken?
Following an investigation, ASIC started proceedings on 25 July, 2017 in the Federal Court of Australia to wind up:
<ul>
<li>Realestate Equity Investment Trust (ARSN 094 623 515) (REIT), and</li>
<li>Timeline Project Management Pty Ltd (ACN 145 830 851) (Timeline).</li>
</ul>
If ASIC's application is successful then liquidators will be appointed to REIT and Timeline.
2. Why did ASIC issue the proceedings?
REIT is a land banking scheme which owns land at 490 Flinders Avenue, Lara, Victoria, which was intended to be rezoned and developed.
ASIC understands that at least 82 investors have invested at least $800,000 in the REIT scheme.
Lotus Securities Pty Ltd (Lotus) was the former responsible entity of REIT.
On 21 September 2016, ASIC cancelled the Australian financial services license (AFSL) of Lotus due to a number of compliance concerns including failure to lodge financial statements for Lotus (for the years 2014 onwards) and REIT (for the years 2012 onwards). 
Lotus was not permitted to act as a responsible entity following the cancellation of its AFSL and no new responsible entity has been appointed.
Lotus is now in liquidation, having been wound up by the Court on 14 December 2016, on application by a creditor. 
ASIC understands that, since June 2013, investors have been making payments in respect of their investment to a bank account in the name of Timeline.
Timeline is not (and has never been) the responsible entity of REIT.
ASIC commenced these current proceedings to protect the interests of investors in the REIT scheme given ASIC’s allegations in the proceedings that, amongst other matters:
<ul>
<li>REIT has been operating despite it not having a validly appointed responsible entity as required under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (the Act)</li>
<li>the REIT scheme appears to be unviable given that there has been no progress in developing the real estate investments of the fund since the initial fundraising</li>
<li>financial statements for REIT have not been prepared or lodged with ASIC since 2012, and</li>
<li>the interests of investors appear to be prejudiced due to the fact that they are still paying monies apparently into the scheme via a bank account held by Timeline.</li>
</ul>
3. What orders does ASIC want the Court to make?
ASIC is seeking orders from the Court to wind up, and to appoint liquidators to, each of REIT and Timeline.
The application is listed before the Court on 4 August, 2017.
4. Will investors get a refund?
ASIC is not seeking compensation or refunds for investors in these proceedings. 
However, if the Court orders the winding up of REIT and Timeline there may be a return to creditors as part of the liquidation process.
The realisation of assets and any distribution to investors will be undertaken by the liquidators appointed by the Court.
5. What rights do investors have?
ASIC is unable to advise investors as to any rights that they may have in relation to ASIC's application.
If investors wish to be represented at the hearing of ASIC's application, then they should seek legal advice.
Investors may also wish to seek independent legal and/or financial advice in relation to their investment in the REIT scheme.
</body></html>

Asic

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Asic

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News