<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/s-p-setia">SP Setia</a> has lodged plans for a $750 million, three-tower mixed-use precinct that would complete the long-running redevelopment of Carlton's former Carlton United Breweries site.

The proposal at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/185-195-queensberry-street-carlton-vic-3053">46-78 Bouverie Street and 185-195 Queensberry Street</a> spans a 6,468 sqm site, the last remaining undeveloped parcels within the former brewery's 2007 masterplan.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cox-architecture">COX Architecture</a>, the development will comprise two purpose-built student accommodation towers and a third build-to-sell apartment tower above a shared commercial podium and basement.

Across the three towers, SP Setia is proposing 606 build-to-sell apartments and 1,499 student accommodation units containing 2,009 beds.

The apartments will sit in the tallest tower, which will rise nearly 200m and 55 storeys. It will become&nbsp;one of the more substantial new build-to-sell apartment projects at the northern edge of Melbourne's CBD.

The apartment mix is weighted toward smaller inner-city product, with 188 studios, 206 one-bedroom apartments, 192 two-bedroom apartments and 20 three-bedroom apartments

<img alt="First look: SP Setia plans three-tower finale for Carlton’s former CUB precinct" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="8271bc87-1b0a-41b7-ac73-a425ee375261" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/3_2.png?VersionId=G4lw23o90B1boX4k4dj7rdz2ZEajS9wy" />

Part of the precinct will be a large-scale&nbsp;3,684 sqm supermarket and a further 2,198 sqm of speciality retail, creating close to 5,900 sqm of new commercial space within the precinct.

But one of the biggest components of the proposal is what sits between the buildings.

Around 4,650 sqm, or roughly 72 per cent of the site, will be publicly accessible open space, incorporating plazas, pedestrian connections, landscaped laneways and retail spill-out areas.

The ground plane is intended to finally complete pedestrian connections envisaged when the CUB masterplan was first approved nearly two decades ago, stitching together Victoria Street, Queensberry Street, Bouverie Street and Swanston Street through the former brewery precinct.

Urbis said the development would "complete the CUB precinct", with the public realm providing important north-south and east-west connections through what is currently the final undeveloped portion of the masterplanned site.

SP Setia is also exploring a new linear park within the Bouverie Street road reserve, with the concept to be developed further with the City of Melbourne through the planning process.

The proposal is being pursued through the Victorian Government's Development Facilitation Program under Clause 53.23 for significant residential development with affordable housing.

The planning report acknowledges the proposed heights exceed those contemplated under the original Comprehensive Development Plan and masterplan, but argues the built-form context has changed considerably over the past two decades.

Urbis said the three towers would instead create a stepped transition between Carlton and the Hoddle Grid, rising progressively from the 94.1-metre Tower One along the Queensberry Street edge to the 199.44-metre Tower Three closer to the established CBD-scale buildings to the south.

<img alt="SP Setia" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e885a07a-592c-40fc-bf82-e6dbaf32da54" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.52.24%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=7s_ErUkSKAdY1mAWp3GRZgMNCGtwhk5m" />

SP Setia plans to deliver the development across three stages.

Stage One would deliver the basement, podium and retail areas for the entire precinct alongside the first student tower. Tower Two would follow in Stage Two, before the 606-apartment Tower Three is delivered as the final stage.

If approved and delivered, the project would close out a redevelopment process that has been underway since the former brewery masterplan was approved in 2007, adding more than 2,600 student beds and apartments to a precinct already home to Swanston Central, the Barak Building, RMIT Design Hub and several large student accommodation developments.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Joel Robinson

SP Setia plans three-tower finale for Carlton’s former CUB precinct

Melbourne developer Lowe Living is seeking to add to its growing bayside apartment pipeline, filing plans for a boutique eight-residence development in tightly held Middle Park.

Lowe Living, which has built much of its development portfolio across Melbourne's affluent bayside and south-east suburbs, is behind the plans for the 730 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/123-125-erskine-street-middle-park-vic-3206">123-125 Erskine Street</a>, just off Armstrong Street and within the Armstrong Street Neighbourhood Activity Centre.

The developer is seeking approval for a five-storey residential building above two basement levels, with just eight large-format apartments and 18 car spaces.

“This is a deliberately very different proposition for us,"&nbsp;Tim Lowe, Co-Founder of Lowe Living, said.

"Eight residences is exceptionally boutique, but that's precisely what this site calls for.

“There is a strong community in Middle Park and the surrounding suburbs who have spent decades building a life here. They no longer want the maintenance of a large period home, but they aren't prepared to compromise on space, quality or location. We think there is a real opportunity to capture that hyper local market. A site like this rarely comes to market.”

<img alt="Lowe " data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="875fe572-0f14-4d90-9e11-55b28dd07731" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.42.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=GDNQRv9BfpR9r1zkZ5UDyUM4ZvpIksut" />

The low-density proposal has been designed by Cera Stribley and is being progressed through the Victorian Government's Great Design Fast Track pathway, having already secured eligibility from the Minister for Planning.

The Office of the Victorian Government Architect supported its eligibility after finding the proposal demonstrated consistency with the program's seven design principles, while the project's financial feasibility has also been independently confirmed by Invest Victoria.

The project is targeting the downsizer market, with the planning documents describing the homes as larger-format residences and noting the two penthouses could otherwise have been configured as four separate apartments.

<img alt="Lowe 2" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="60ab0987-2da6-4175-adac-315dcf6053c6" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.43.15%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=bOCPH0B2MFwlmaRW.TTCF9TzyifgVoQI" />

The site has dual frontage to Erskine Street and Canterbury Place and currently comprises a collection of commercial buildings used as offices, including a former heritage bakehouse, a former stable, a later gabled addition and a central courtyard.

It sits within the Commercial 1 Zone and the Armstrong Street Commercial Precinct heritage overlay, with the existing property classified as a contributory heritage place.

Heritage has subsequently played a significant role in Cera Stribley's design.

The front section of the former bakehouse facing Erskine Street will be retained, including its return walls, street-facing hipped roof and chimneys, while the Erskine Street façade and part of the western return wall of the former stable will also be incorporated into the new development.

Levels four and five will be set back five metres from the retained stable façade, while bricks removed through demolition are proposed to be salvaged and reused within the new building where possible.

<img alt="Lowe 3" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e97927a9-a2de-4a0f-83b6-65451238abfa" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-08-21%20at%208.43.06%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=VR44AChLrX9q1XPB9GvVQV.ALXXbe4gC" />

Rather than presenting as a single five-storey building to Erskine Street, Cera Stribley has broken the development into a series of distinct forms.

A three-storey infill element will sit between the retained bakehouse and stable façades, with the upper levels recessed behind the heritage fabric. Canterbury Place will similarly feature two three-storey podium forms, separated by a central pedestrian accessway, before the upper two levels step back from the street.

A pedestrian through-link will run through the centre of the project between Erskine Street and Canterbury Place, creating entrances from both sides of the site and introducing landscaping and communal areas through the ground plane.

Landscape architect Acre has designed planting across the ground level, private terraces and upper levels, including a feature canopy tree at level three and integrated planting and arbours across the level four terraces. Five existing Erskine Street trees are proposed to be retained.

Sustainability is also a significant component of the Great Design Fast Track application. The apartments are targeting an average eight-star NatHERS rating, with no residence below 6.5 stars, while the project has achieved a 75 per cent BESS score. Seven of the eight apartments are designed for cross-ventilation, with the remaining residence using mechanically assisted natural ventilation.

The plans also incorporate an 8kWp rooftop solar system, a 5,000-litre rainwater tank and infrastructure allowing future electric vehicle charging for every residence.

Lowe has a strong portfolio across Melbourne's blue-chip suburbs. They recently launched <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/jardin-house-by-lowe-living-camberwell-335-camberwell-road-camberwell-vic-3124">Jardin House by Lowe Living</a> in Camberwell, their first development in the Stonnington LGA.

Lowe Living unveils Middle Park apartment development

Article summary

<ul data-end="888" data-start="289">
	<li data-end="442" data-section-id="8tsh6o" data-start="289">DVB Projects is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway at 137 Old Burleigh Road, Broadbeach.</li>
	<li data-end="573" data-section-id="1nyxl3e" data-start="443">The 34-level tower will comprise just 49 ultra-luxury residences, including half-floor, full-floor and penthouse apartments.</li>
	<li data-end="717" data-section-id="oiyimj" data-start="574">The launch follows strong demand at DVB's nearby Sea Glass project, which is more than 50 per cent sold and currently under construction.</li>
	<li data-end="888" data-section-id="epk9o9" data-start="718">The development adds to the transformation of Old Burleigh Road, with premium beachfront apartment projects continuing to reshape the tightly held Broadbeach strip.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/dvb-projects">DVB Projects</a> is preparing to launch its second Gold Coast apartment development, with demolition now underway on the Broadbeach site as the Sydney developer moves closer to bringing the ultra-luxury project to market.

The 34-level tower at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/137-old-burleigh-road-broadbeach-qld-4218">137 Old Burleigh Road</a> will comprise just 49 residences, ranging from half-floor apartments through to full-floor homes and a penthouse. The launch follows the strong sales performance of DVB's nearby Sea Glass development. More than half of the apartments at Sea Glass, on the other side of Broadbeach, have been snapped up, well ahead of its late 2027 completion

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2944b4be-c84e-4b54-8dc1-c712e76704c0" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E02_Exterior_Street%20Level%20Entrance.jpg?VersionId=YoNig7pRdrE3HCue7sUj78LzJteeQf3H" />

The start of demolition at 137 Old Burleigh Road signals DVB Projects’ underlying confidence in the Gold Coast’s luxury beachside apartment sector.

“We see the Gold Coast as one of the most compelling lifestyle markets in Australia, particularly at the premium end where demand continues to deepen,” said Dean Brown, Managing Director of DVB.&nbsp;

“This project has been carefully designed to respond to that demand - delivering large-format residences with a level of quality, privacy and amenity that is still relatively rare in the apartment market on the beachside."

Brown says the site itself is "exceptional."

"Old Burleigh Road is one of the most tightly held beachfront strips, and opportunities to deliver a project of this scale and calibre in this location are extremely limited.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="398f377a-c037-455e-9250-0c5e0d84c35b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/I12_FF%20Balcony.jpg?VersionId=NwOiRWGMubR1c8wthuEfggklcja7al9." />

The project will comprise 40 half-floor residences of approximately 260 sqm, alongside eight full-floor residences spanning around 524 sqm.

A single penthouse will crown the building, featuring a private pool, barbecue area, indoor gym and dedicated entertaining spaces.

Residents will have access to a resort-style suite of amenities, including a 20-metre pool with daybeds, a gymnasium, hot and cold plunge pools, a sauna, and private residents’ lounge and dining facilities.

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="d1642bb0-9a66-4427-a022-dfc0988c6287" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/A02_Pool%20to%20View.jpg?VersionId=c0IXPyn_Gp_Kn3XCwzMrqIVkAdCEwVXP" />

Sales agent Todd Matheson, of <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/pezet-matheson">Pezet Matheson</a>, which is marketing both 137 Old Burleigh Road and Sea Glass, said 137 Old Burleigh Road would address a clear gap in the market for genuine luxury products.

“There are very few opportunities on the Gold Coast where buyers can secure a residence of this size and quality in a new building,” Matheson said.

“What we’re seeing is a growing cohort of downsizers and interstate buyers who still want space - they’re not willing to compromise on living area, entertaining or finishes.

“This project has been designed with that buyer in mind. It offers the scale of a home, combined with the convenience and security of apartment living, in one of the coast’s most desirable positions.”

<img alt="DVB Projects to commence demolition on $320m Broadbeach luxury tower" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="59aae0ca-5639-4320-8aca-d0bf60f48e43" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/E01_Exterior%20Hero.jpg?VersionId=DS8Zfy2WtgUEtdfe0TEUuf1W1GfcZq8S" />

Located on a 1,156 sqm site one block from the beachfront, the development will replace an ageing walk-up building and is expected to contribute to the ongoing transformation of the Old Burleigh Road strip into one of the Gold Coast’s most prestigious residential corridors.

With the development moving into the delivery phase, 137 Old Burleigh Road is slated to hit the market later this year.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145141]

DVB Projects to launch second Broadbeach apartment tower as demolition commences

<a data-end="327" data-is-only-node="" data-start="250" href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/norus-projects" rel="noopener" target="_new">Norus Developments</a> has lodged plans for a new apartment development in Clayton that would add further momentum to the suburb's emerging Green Street corridor.

Plans have been lodged for the consolidated site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/1359-1365-centre-road-clayton-vic-3168">1359-1365 Centre Road</a>, where Norus is seeking approval for 218 apartments across a 12-storey apartment building designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/life-architecture-and-urban-design">Life Architecture</a>.

The proposal sits within the Clayton Major Activity Centre at the threshold of the planned Green Street corridor, a landscaped pedestrian connection intended to improve links through the precinct towards Clayton Railway Station.

The development would replace the site's existing collection of low-scale residential and commercial buildings with a single consolidated building, introducing significantly greater housing density to this part of Centre Road.

A retail tenancy is proposed at ground level to activate the Centre Road frontage, accompanied by transparent street interfaces and landscaping intended to create a more pedestrian-focused edge to the development.

<img alt="First look: Norus Developments plans landscape-led apartment project for Clayton’s emerging Green Street" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="0a5a763a-d9e9-4253-af2f-88008de27ebf" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Clayton%20a.png?VersionId=S2WJJbat1XVkZwB9SnYtygirXgWHiklX" />

The building has been designed with stepped massing and upper-level setbacks to manage its transition towards surrounding residential properties. The planning report describes the approach as one that integrates the building into the landscape rather than treating landscaping as a secondary element.

"A strong landscape and public realm strategy underpins the proposal," Urbis states in the planning report.

"Public benefits include an affordable housing contribution, a new pocket park, generous landscaped setbacks, deep soil planting and integrated Water Sensitive Urban Design."

The report adds that these elements are intended to create "a permeable, pedestrian-focused ground plane that enhances walkability, supports urban cooling and reinforces the emerging Green Street character."

Biophilic and passive design principles extend through the residential levels, with planting, daylight, natural ventilation and views towards landscaped areas forming part of the amenity strategy.

Parking would be concentrated away from the public realm, with 145 car spaces proposed from the rear laneway rather than dominating the Centre Road frontage.

The proposal follows an extensive pre-application process with the City of Monash. Three formal meetings were held between the project team and Council from December 2025 to March 2026, with the scheme evolving through several concept iterations before the current design was lodged.

The project arrives as Clayton prepares for substantial change around its established activity centre and the wider Suburban Rail Loop precinct. Its position on Centre Road places the development within an existing concentration of shops, services and public transport, while the Green Street connection is intended to strengthen pedestrian access towards Clayton Railway Station.

First look: Norus plans landscape-led apartment project for Clayton’s emerging Green Street

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/gardner-vaughan-group">Gardner Vaughan Group</a> has officially commenced construction on Bronze on Chevron, celebrating the sod turning of its first-ever Gold Coast development and marking a significant milestone in the company's continued expansion across South East Queensland.&nbsp;

Following the successful delivery of premium residential developments throughout Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/bronze-on-chevron-8-mawarra-street-chevron-island-qld-4217">Bronze on Chevron</a> represents Gardner Vaughan Group's entry into the Gold Coast market. Bronze will deliver 119 one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments above two ground-level retail tenancies.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107520 project_image_fid=367193]

The recent sod turning ceremony was attended by Deputy Mayor Mark Hammel, President of the Surfers Paradise Surf Life Saving Club, Cassandra Sedgman, project consultants, purchasers, project partners and invited guests to celebrate the commencement of construction.&nbsp;

Gardner Vaughan Group Chief Executive Officer Simon Betteridge said Bronze on Chevron represented an exciting new chapter for the business.&nbsp;

"We've spent almost four decades building homes that respond to the way people want to live, and we're excited to bring that experience to <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/chevron-island-qld-4217">Chevron Island</a>," Betteridge said.

"Bronze on Chevron is particularly significant because it marks Gardner Vaughan Group's first development on the Gold Coast following many successful projects across Brisbane and the Sunshine Coast."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=107520 project_image_fid=367183]

Betteridge said the ground breaking is a proud moment for the&nbsp;team and their purchasers, who can now see their future homes beginning to take shape.&nbsp;

"As both developer and builder, we're able to oversee every aspect of the project from design through to construction, ensuring the quality and attention to detail Gardner Vaughan Group has become renowned for."&nbsp;

Designed by acclaimed architectural practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/cottee-parker-architects">Cottee Parker</a>, Bronze on Chevron has been thoughtfully designed to complement Chevron Island's evolving streetscape while embracing its relaxed coastal lifestyle.

The development will offer generous residences with refined interiors, premium finishes and resort-style amenities, with completion anticipated in early 2029.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=107520]

The development will offer generous residences with refined interiors, premium finishes and resort-style amenities, with completion anticipated in early 2029

Gardner Vaughan Group breaks ground on first Gold Coast development, Bronze on Chevron

Asic

<html><body>
BDO never provided "any satisfactory explanation" as to why they did not adopt a "common-sense approach" on the issue of the return of $5 million in art and antiques caught in the Mossgreen administration, the Federal Court of Appeal has noted.
The now published judgement that admonished BDO came after BDO was thrawted in its attempt to impose a hefty fee on clients of the collapsed auction house, as they sought to recoup the $1 million in expenses undertaken without reference to the courts.
The initial judgement by Federal Court judge Nye Perram ruled the BDO administrators were "intermeddling" in other people's goods in circumstances "where they had not been invited to do so, were not performing their statuatory functions and had not been appointed receivers."
The <a href="https://propertyobserver.com.au/forward-planning/investment-strategy/property-news-and-insights/82443-meddling-bdo-appeal-federal-court-mossgreen-loss" target="_blank">BDO appeal indicated</a> that shortly after the appointment of the administrators to Mossgreen, BDO started to receive requests for the return of consigned items.
But instead of seeking directions at that point from the Federal Court about how the employees could be put to work using their specialist knowledge to deal with those requests and return the items to which Mossgreen made no claim, the administrators instead took alternate steps.
These included pursuing a costly stocktake of all consigned items irrespective of their value and whether they had been abandoned. BDO also sought a deed of arrangement or outright sale.
"There seems to be no reason why such requests for returns could not have been dealt with even while those other options were pursued by the administrators," the Federal Court of Appeal noted in today's published judgment.
While not agreeing to the entirety of Justice Perram's ruling, the judgement, signed off by the Honourable Chief Justice Allsop and Justices Banks-Smith and Colvin, reiterated the error in BDO's administration.
"A different course would have been to allow consignors to immediately make claims. 
"Directions could have been sought as to the process to be followed. 
"It may have involved the presentation by owners of statutory declarations, receipts, references to catalogues, descriptions of the items claimed (many of which, due to the nature of Mossgreen’s business, were unique in character and were amenable to ready description by identifying features) and release of items in accordance with usual processes followed by Mossgreen employees.
"Other steps could be taken to deal with items that were identified as having little value or had not been the subject of any claim for an extended period. 
"These steps, if presented to the court, could have been approved by way of directions or as part of a supervised process by which the administrators were appointed as receivers to the goods and many items could have been promptly released at much less cost," the judges ruled.
"No satisfactory explanation was provided as to why such a common-sense approach was not followed, or why it was not possible or not desirable or practicable," the judges noted.
The judges noted detailed affidavits provided by BDO administrator James White provided "no evidence" that he turned his mind to the extent to which the stocktake was needed in order to return most items to their owners (as distinct from providing the administrators with a complete list of all of the items held).
"There is no evidence of any thought process by which he considered the significance of the extent to which the items held were legacy items of little value, the extent to which the stocktake was necessary in order to deal with claims by owners, the extent to which the costs involved were proportional to the value of goods involved, and the likely cost to individual owners if the stocktake was undertaken."
"It is one thing to investigate the inventory management systems. 
"It is a different thing to consider how most efficiently to return the property of third parties to them. 
"The administrators were dealing with property to which the company had no claim," the judges adding the question was not whether Mossgreen had good inventory management systems but whether its existing systems could be used to promptly and cost-effectively return the consigned items to their owners."
The judges noted given that the BDO administrators sought directions after the event, in effect to approve the course that they have already undertaken, so then they must be able to demonstrate that they were justified in what they did.
It was initially estimated that Mossgreen held in excess of 10,000 items on consignment, held across three premises in Victoria, their High Street, Armidale premises, a site in NSW on Queen Street, Woollahra and a third party warehouse in Clayton, Victoria.
The goods were classified into the following categories:
1.    Items sold at auction prior to our appointment and not yet collected by purchasers;
2.    Unsold items of recent auctions held on consignment on behalf of vendors;
3.    Items held on consignment for future auctions;
4.    Items abandoned by purchasers and vendors;
5.    Items stored at the Company’s warehouse awaiting collection by vendors; and
6.    Artwork consigned to the Company to hang in the gallery.
The stocktake identified that Mossgreen retained 6,935 lots (or 4,663 lots excluding stamps and coins) on behalf of in excess of 800 consignors (or in excess 600 consignors excluding stamps and coins).
After including abandoned items, and allowing for the prospect that owners of such items were unlikely to make claims, the judges noted it could be seen that the extent of claims by individual owners to the return of individual items was not as overwhelming a task as BDO advised.
The total cost of the stocktaking exercise was $1,048,072. It comprised the following: wages of $240,747 as of the company’s 36 employees, after 19 were terminated in January 2018, the remainder were kept on.
An amount of $180,075 had been included for rent. An amount of $54,000 was included for insurance and $45,849 was included for security.
There was $122,605 allocated for the costs of engaging the Tiger stocktake company to undertake a complete stocktake of all consigned goods. 
Some $72,500 had been included for legal costs for obtaining advice as to consignor Tasks and seeking directions from the court.
Fes for the administrators were put at $126,551 and disbursements of $11,033 to 31 January 2018.
Actual administrator’s costs from 1 February 2018 to 16 March 2018 have been $200,715.
All of the above were based on estimates to 31 March 2018. 
James White noted that the ongoing cost of following the process that the administrators have adopted is $109,532 per week.
The judges noted that "to put the above estimates in context, Mr White says that he has estimated that Mossgreen held Consignor Property (being all of the property listed after the stocktake) in excess of $5 million in value.
"So, the steps that have been taken by the administrators have resulted in costs, which if charged to consignors, will substantially deplete the value of property to which the administrators lay no claim to at all."
Tye judges considered that there was potentially an entitlement to an equitable lien with respect to work properly done and expenses properly incurred that benefit a consignor by securing and protecting their property that is deposited at the company’s premises until it is returned under an efficient process proportional to the nature of the goods in question. 
"Whether equity would grant such lien and its extent may depend upon the value of the statutory lien and the particular circumstances of the administrators’conduct.
"We do not consider the administrators established a right to a lie as claimed and accordingly the grounds are dismissed
"The administrators have not demonstrated that they are entitled to a lien covering the type of costs and in the amount that they have asserted in their dealings with owners of the consigned items.
"There may be a lien in some amount that might arise in the circumstances of this case.
"However, the Court is now faced with an application for directions blessing conduct of a kind that is not justified on the basis of the nature and extent of the lien advanced to support the judicial directions sought. 
"Further, by reason of the conduct of the administrators in not seeking directions at an early stage when consideration might be given to all options, including issues of proportionality, the extent of any actual difficulties in dealing with the consigned items that might be redressed by the stocktake, the possibility of an appointment as receiver to the goods to implement a plan approved by the Court and an assessment of the likely costs before they are incurred, the Court is not now in a position to make that determination on the evidence presented to support the present application. 
"Owners have been held out of their consigned items for a considerable period and we question whether the administrators would be justified in delaying further the release of consigned items while there is some form of retrospective assessment of the amount of a lien that may be required to be paid as a condition of release of property to the owners."
The appeal should be dismissed, the judges ruled, with further aspects of the administration yet to be decided.
DB Studdy SC with RM Foreman, briefed by King &amp; Wood Mallesons represented BDO. Dr O Bigos, briefed by Piper Alderman, represented the aggrieved Mossgreen clients who have yet to be advised just when they will be able to retrieve what is rightfully theirs.
<div title="Page 5">
The names of the creditors are a who's who from across Australia, ranging from passionate collectors, socialites, low key business tycoons to deceased estates.
Melbourne veteran caterer Peter Rowland was caught amid the clients, with around $166,000 owed to the catering company.
</div>
<div title="Page 5">
Sydney's society Coppleson family were listed as owed $465,000, the third highest-owed creditor. Their Potts Point penthouse sold to Gretel Packer for $8.75 million.
</div>
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

BDO failed the "common sense" approach to Mossgreen inventory administration

<html><body>
ASIC has obtained orders from the Federal Court to wind up an illegal investment scheme known as the VKK Investments Unit Trust (VKK scheme), as well as the trustee and operator of that scheme, Gem Management Group Pty Ltd (Gem).
The principal asset of the VKK scheme is land located at 64 Hutton Road, Keysborough in Victoria (below).
Around 125 investors invested a total of approximately $22 million into the VKK scheme, which Gem operated since May 2010 on the expectation that the land at Hutton Road would be re-zoned, which has not occurred.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/4/23/keysb.jpg" alt="">
ASIC's investigation identified that:
<ul>
<li>the VKK scheme is a managed investment scheme which has not been registered, as required under the Corporations Act; and</li>
<li>Gem, which does not hold an Australian financial services licence, had also breached the Act by operating an unregistered managed investment scheme.</li>
</ul>
A number of investors in the VKK scheme were represented in the proceedings brought by ASIC and made submissions in support of ASIC’s application to wind up the VKK scheme and Gem. 
Robert Woods and Salvatore Algeri of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu have been appointed as joint liquidators of Gem and joint liquidators and trustees of the VKK scheme. The liquidators will have management of the VKK scheme and the land at Hutton Road.
ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said, "Today the Federal Court took action to wind up an unlawful managed investment scheme and its operator. The ruling is a warning to those involved in unlawful schemes, including those that involve land banking, that ASIC will move to protect investors and have these unlawful schemes wound up."
"Land banking schemes have been a particular focus of ASIC. ASIC reminds investors considering investing in  land banking schemes they are often unregulated and that investors have little protection if something goes wrong", Mr Kell said.
</body></html>

jrobinson-rf4aSBido9

Federal Court orders wind up of illegal Keysborough land banking investment

<html><body>
BDO has lost another judgement in the ongoing saga of its Mossgreen voluntary administration.
The Federal Court of Appeal knocked out it case this morning, with the reasons yet to be issued.
The return of art and antiques to their vendors/buyers is no sure thing, as the possibility of any unpaid rent could see the High Street, Armadale and Clayton landlords lock up the premises and hold the goods in the worst case scenario.
Click here <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2018/4/19/courtorder.jpg" target="_blank">to enlarge. </a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/4/19/courtorder.jpg" alt="">
The matter related to BDO's administration of the Mossgreen goods and chattels, especially costs relating to their storage and insurance.
BDO had been seeking to charge clients of the collapsed auction house for the return of their goods.
Clients were furious at BDO's attempts to charge a fee – levied at $353 per lot – to have their own property returned, especially as some lots were going to cost more for their return that their actual value.
The initial judgement savaged the accountancy firm.
Federal Court judge Nye Perram ruled the administrators were "intermeddling" in other people's goods in circumstances "where they had not been invited to do so, were not performing their statuatory functions and had not been appointed receivers."
"Accordingly, they are not justified in requiring the consignors to pay a levy for the return of their goods," he ruled.
"In reaching this conclusion I have not disregarded what is sometimes referred to as the 'salvage' nature of the work done by external administrators or the concomitant need to ensure that persons are not deterred from doing such work in the future.
"But that well-founded policy consideration cannot provide cover for external administrators who decide to deal in assets of other persons for no reason relating to the administration of which they are seized," the judgement said.
"I conclude, therefore, that the alleged equitable lien does not arise.
"On the other hand, they are entitled to a lien for disposing of goods which ultimately turn out to be unclaimed and they should be entitled to realise those goods and, subject to any claim, apply the proceeds for the purposes of the administration."
The judge has noted the issue of the ongoing storage costs at the Armadale (pictured) and Clayton premises had become the centre of the unravelling legal embroglio.
His honour noted the issue was one of "spot fires' that had arisen during the voluntary administration.
BDO's James White urgently sought by way of interlocutory application a series of directions to protect the besieged accountancy firm in terms of storage rental and insurance costs going forward.
<div class="judgment_content">
<div id="content_div_544611">
<div id="judgment_div_544609" class="docx_judgment_content">
"The effect of my decision is that the administrators, to the extent that they have been conducting the process of looking after and attempting to return by means of orderly stocktake the consigned goods to the consignors, have acted outside the functions which are conferred on an administrator and, accordingly, they are not entitled to indemnity or remuneration in respect of that," Federal Court judge Nye Perram noted in another judgement.
"The consequence of that conclusion, so far as rent which has been paid in the past is concerned, is that the rent is the administrators’ cost," he noted.
There was a stocktake that cost more than $1 million which Federal Court judge Nye Perram noted could have been court approved if permission had been sought by BDO prior to its undertaking.
The auction house held 1000s of goods belonging to other people, consisting of:
(a)  goods delivered to it to be auctioned but which had not yet been auctioned at the time the administrators were appointed;
(b)  goods delivered for auction but which had failed to sell and which were awaiting collection by their owners; and
(c)  goods which, although successfully sold at auction, had not yet been collected by the successful bidder.
The initial case judge noted a number of persons whose goods were successfully sold at auction by Mossgreen now claim that the money received by it from their respective purchasers is held on trust for them and is not, therefore, available for general creditors.
The three-cornered contest between the administrators, the trust-asserting consignors and the secured creditor is to be determined by the court later this year.
</div>
</div>
</div>
The besieged administrator of collapsed auction house has yet to advise, today Thursday, when clients and buyers can collect the artwork and collectibles.
<div>
BDO administrator James White had previously said the levy was "not negotiable". 
ASIC has reportedly not yet raised any concerns in relation to the administrators' conduct, but is expected to once the legalities are all done.
The administrators meet quick initial resistance when they told the first meeting of creditors in January that were exploring court judgements on whether a constructive trust arrangement existed.
Minter Ellison lawyer Lindsay Powers, on behalf of art collector Michele Asprey, suggested "this was the clearest case of a trust relationship he has encountered." 
Michelle Asprey was among those who presented their argument regarding the $353 levy in the recent court case over the proposed BDO fee.
The administration came December 21 following failed fundraising attempts.
<div title="Page 5">
Sumner, who did not attend the first meeting, blamed the current circumstance on growing "a little bit fast."
There were 330 creditors initially identified at the meeting who were told no law required trust accounts for the auction proceeds.
There has yet been a second creditors meeting, given a court extension has been granted.
<div title="Page 5">
The names of the creditors are a who's who from across Australia, ranging from passionate collectors, socialites, low key business tycoons to deceased estates.The biggest unsecured creditor stemmed from the auction of a book collection.
Some $1.75 million is owed to the family of the late wealthy insurance underwriter Martin Copley who auctioned off the books in October.
His auction items included John Gould's monumental The Birds of Australia, a large folio in eight volumes with 681 hand-coloured lithographed plates, bound in dark green morocco by Riviere, an original subscriber's set, which sold at $446,400 including premium.
The second biggest client was another deceased estate, that of the late South Australian building industry icon Alan Hickinbotham and his late wife Margaret.
It was billed as the highest value collection ever to be sold in Adelaide when auctioned in May by Mossgreen's chief, Paul Sumner.
Sydney's society Coppleson family were listed as owed $465,000, the third highest-owed creditor.
It followed the sale of the contents of the Macleay Regis penthouse, home (pictured top) of the late esteemed gynaecologist Professor Malcolm Coppleson and his late wife, Patricia, who was Vogue Living’s editor-at-large.
The 172 lots included the sale of a $192,200 Ian Fairweather work which had an $80,000 to $120,000 price guidance. A Tim Maguire fetched $117,800.
Mossgreen's last auction on December 7 last year was the contents of the Sheehy family with just 274 of the 438 lots being sold. The family, who are owed $45,000, inquired at the meeting whether Sumner's passport would be surrendered.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

BDO lose another Mossgreen administration Federal Court judgement

<html><body>
The judge in the ongoing Mossgreen court hearings has made an order that the BDO administrators are justified in not returning the auction goods before the Full Court rules on the appeal of an earlier judgement on the fate of the valuable art and antiques currently caught up in the collapse of the auction house.
"I will make an order to that effect," Justice Perram said yesterday.
But the issue of the ongoing storage costs at the Armadale (pictured) and Clayton premises has become the centre of an unravelling legal embroglio.
His honour noted the issue was one of "spot fires' that had arisen during the voluntary administration.
BDO's James White had urgently sought by way of interlocutory application a series of directions to protect the besieged accountancy firm in terms of storage rental and insurance costs going forward.
<div class="judgment_content">
<div id="content_div_544611">
<div id="judgment_div_544609" class="docx_judgment_content">
"The effect of my decision is that the administrators, to the extent that they have been conducting the process of looking after and attempting to return by means of orderly stocktake the consigned goods to the consignors, have acted outside the functions which are conferred on an administrator and, accordingly, they are not entitled to indemnity or remuneration in respect of that," Federal Court judge Nye Perram noted yesterday.
"The consequence of that conclusion, so far as rent which has been paid in the past is concerned, is that the rent is the administrators’ cost," he noted.
BDO are appealing an earlier judgement that ruled the fee-seeking administrators were "intermeddling" in other people's goods in circumstances "where they had not been invited to do so, were not performing their statuatory functions and had not been appointed receivers" when BDO sought to require the consignors to pay a levy for the return of their goods.
There was a stocktake that cost more than $1 million which Federal Court judge Nye Perram noted could have been court approved if permission had been sought by BDO prior to its undertaking.
"If the Full Court reverses my decision, then the administrators will be entitled to recover that rental and insurance cost by means of the equitable lien which will, by that time, have been reinstated," Federal Court judge Nye Perram noted.
"If they are unsuccessful in the appeal to the Full Court, then they will have no equitable lien and they will have no entitlement to be reimbursed in respect of the rent.
"The difficulty with the proposed interlocutory orders which are being sought is that, although couched, as Mr Foreman of counsel put it, as if it were an interim stay, they are not actually interim in effect.
"If I now make an order, as is sought, that the administrators are justified in causing the company to retain and to continue to pay the rent, then, even if the Full Court upholds my decision, at least for the period covered by that direction, the administrators will have been acting within their statutory remit.
"This is because I will have so held this afternoon, even though, on this hypothesis, I will have held in a final order that the administrators are not entitled and the Full Court will have upheld that.
"That is not a situation which seems to me to be possible.
"I doubt whether I have the power to make the orders which are sought in relation to trying to put the administrators in a position where they can pay the rent and be sure that it has got to their account. 
"Even if I do have the power, I would not, as a matter of discretion, exercise it for the reasons which I have given.
"I therefore refuse that aspect of the interlocutory application.
"On the other hand, the administrators are also concerned that, if consignors begin turning up at the premises in the next day or so before the Full Court appeal and demand their goods and the goods are returned to them, and if thereafter the administrators are successful in their Full Court appeal, they will have lost their lien because the goods will have been gone.
"This seems to me to be an unanswerable submission.
"I therefore accede to the suggestion that I should make an order that the administrators in substance would be justified in not returning the goods before the disposition of the Full Court appeal and I will make an order to that effect."
The auction house held a large quantity of goods belonging to other people, consisting of:
(a)  goods delivered to it to be auctioned but which had not yet been auctioned at the time the administrators were appointed;
(b)  goods delivered for auction but which had failed to sell and which were awaiting collection by their owners; and
(c)  goods which, although successfully sold at auction, had not yet been collected by the successful bidder.
The judge noted a number of persons whose goods were successfully sold at auction by Mossgreen now claim that the money received by it from their respective purchasers is held on trust for them and is not, therefore, available for general creditors.
The three-cornered contest between the administrators, the trust-asserting consignors and the secured creditor is to be determined by the court later this year.
The judge noted the administrators have in the meantime two alternate interests in recovering the cost of the stocktake and related expenses from the consignors.
"On the one hand, if the secured creditor’s claim for $6 million and the trust claims are unsuccessful then the administrators will be entitled to recover the stocktake expense under their indemnity out of the company’s assets conferred by s 443D of the Act.
"However, this will significantly dilute the return to unsecured creditors as Mr White acknowledged.
"On the other hand, if the secured creditor is successful in asserting his security (or the trust claims succeed), then the administrators will bear the costs themselves since there will be no company property available from which their indemnity may be acquitted.
"In either case, the administrators have a motive to seek to have the consignors meet the cost of the stocktake."
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Stored Mossgreen art and antique rental and insurance liability issue flares

<html><body>
ASIC has obtained orders from the Supreme Court of Queensland appointing provisional liquidators to three companies due to concerns about a herd of approximately 261 head of cattle abandoned by Nangus Holdings Pty Ltd (previously Nant Angus Holdings Pty Ltd) management.
Nant Angus offered an investment in cattle to retail investors.
As part of the investment arrangement, Nant Angus was to lease the herds back from the investor for a period of five years from the date of purchase and then buy them back from the investor at an agreed price.
Investors were told that during the lease period they would be paid an annual interest rate of 9.95 per cent on their investment capital.
Investors were introduced to this investment through full page advertisements taken out in the Australian Financial Review newspaper by Nant Angus.
ASIC has obtained orders from the Supreme Court of Queensland appointing Mr Richard Hughes and Mr David Orr of Deloitte as provisional liquidators to three companies:
<ol>
<li>Nangus Holdings Group Pty Ltd</li>
<li>Nangus Holdings Pty Ltd</li>
<li>Nangus Grazing Company Pty Ltd</li>
</ol>
ASIC applied for and obtained these orders as part of an ongoing investigation into the Nangus Group of companies.
The orders were sought by ASIC due to concerns about the solvency and lack of management of the companies.
Keith Batt and Margaret Letizia, the individuals responsible for the creation and management of the companies, are now both personally bankrupt, disqualifying them from managing a corporation.
The orders require the provisional liquidators to provide a detailed report to the Court regarding the financial position and management of each company so the Court can consider whether to make final orders to wind the companies up.
The couple's Hamilton house has recently been listed for sale by the receivers.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

ASIC express concern over fate of Nant Angus cattle 

<html><body>
BDO, the besieged administrators for Mossgreen, are to appeal their recent Federal Court defeat, further delaying the return of art to clients of the collapsed auction house.
The accountancy firm lost their expensive court case last week seeking to charge clients for the return of their goods.
Weekly holding costs are ticking over at $44,000.
Clients, already furious at BDO's attempts to charge a $353 per lot to have their own property returned, are in the dark as to just when they will be able to collect their unsold or purchased lots.
But BDO claims to have incurred about $1,150,000 (including GST) of costs including the stocktaking and storing of auction lots. 
BDO’s application argued a complete stocktake of vendor lots was required by the specialist firm, Tiger Asset Group.
"I am concerned about the risk the administrators will be personally liable for these costs and expenses," James advised the court in a hasty affidavit lodged after the recent court loss.
The court judgement savaged the accountancy firm when Federal Court judge Nye Perram ruled the fee-seeking administrators were "intermeddling" in other people's goods in circumstances "where they had not been invited to do so, were not performing their statuatory functions and had not been appointed receivers."
"Accordingly, they are not justified in requiring the consignors to pay a levy for the return of their goods," he ruled.
As part of the hearing, BDO Australia has asked the Federal Court to rule that all its court costs be paid out of Mossgreen's limited estate which, if agreed, will reduce the available funds for even secured creditors.
There has also been no ruling on allocating costs of the stocktaking.
<div>
BDO administrator James White had previously said the amount of the levy was "not negotiable".
"It is still a nightmare," the art collecting accountant Tom Lowenstein told Ross Greenwood's 2GB last week.
He said it was devastating for some of his art world clients yet to get their own property back.
BDO had not responded to a request for public comments, Ross Greenwood told his listeners. 
There has still not been a second creditors meeting yet held, which is another source of bewilderment by the many auction house vendors.
"There's been deafening silence as to when the second creditors meeting will be held," one aggrieved collector noted.
It has been mooted BDO could potentially face a motion to be replaced at the meeting.
Toorak businessman Jack Gringlas​ remains the biggest secured creditor, being owed $6 million. 
The administration came December 21 with the initially identified 330 creditors told no law required trust accounts for the auction proceeds.
<div title="Page 5">
<div title="Page 5">
The names of the creditors are a who's who from across Australia, ranging from passionate collectors, socialites, low key business tycoons to deceased estates.
The appointment of administrators has revealed that Mossgreen was insolvent to a significant extent.
One of its administrators, James White, gave evidence that as at March his investigations had revealed that it had $2.8 million of assets and $14.8 million of creditors including the secured creditor to the value of $6 million.
There is also the additional issue where a number of persons whose goods were successfully sold at auction by Mossgreen now claim that the money received by it from their respective purchasers is held on trust for them and is not, therefore, available for general creditors.
The three-cornered contest between the administrators, the trust-asserting consignors and the secured creditor is to be determined later this year.
Justice Perram noted if the outcome of that contest is that the secured creditor is entitled to rely upon his security, the return to general creditors will be nil.
Justice Perram noted "even if it is not, the return to them will be no more than 18.9 cents in the dollar (i.e. $2.8 million divided by $14.8 million) and even that is on the assumption that the trust claims fail.
Some of the present difficulty arises because Mossgreen did not conduct its inventory control systems competently despite the holding of other people’s goods being a central part of its business.
When the administrators were appointed there was uncertainty as to the status of some of the stock which was on hand, although Paul Sumner offered to work for free to assist the process.
The inventory system suggested that there were as many as 34,000 lots being held, but the limited staff (who were kept on for this purpose) thought there were between 8,000 and 12,000 lots.
"The Administrators have carefully considered Justice Perram’s judgment, as well as the options available to the Administrators to achieve an orderly resolution of the Company’s affairs," creditors were told today.
<div title="Page 2">
<div>
<div>
"The Administrators have decided to appeal Justice Perram’s decision to the Full Federal Court," White advised.
A notice of appeal was filed by the adminstrators on 12 April 2018, with accompanying submissions regarding the urgency of the appeal.
The Federal Court has confirmed that the appeal is due to be heard on an urgent basis on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 not before 12.00pm before a bench of three Judges.
The Administrators applied separately for orders preserving the status quo pending the urgent appeal.
At a case management hearing held on 13 April 2018, the Federal Court made the order that the administrators are justified in causing the company to retain possession of the consignor property until the determination of the notice of appeal.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Meddling BDO to appeal Federal Court Mossgreen loss

<html><body>
BDO, the besieged administrators for Mossgreen, have lost their expensive court case seeking to charge clients of the collapsed auction house for the return of their goods.
Clients were furious at BDO's attempts to charge a fee – levied at $353 per lot – to have their own property returned.
Some lots were going to cost more for their return that their actual value.
The judgement this morning savaged the accountancy firm.
Federal Court judge Nye Perram ruled the administrators were "intermeddling" in other people's goods in circumstances "where they had not been invited to do so, were not performing their statuatory functions and had not been appointed receivers."
"Accordingly, they are not justified in requiring the consignors to pay a levy for the return of their goods," he ruled.
"In reaching this conclusion I have not disregarded what is sometimes referred to as the 'salvage' nature of the work done by external administrators or the concomitant need to ensure that persons are not deterred from doing such work in the future.
"But that well-founded policy consideration cannot provide cover for external administrators who decide to deal in assets of other persons for no reason relating to the administration of which they are seized," the judgement said.
"I conclude, therefore, that the alleged equitable lien does not arise.
"On the other hand, they are entitled to a lien for disposing of goods which ultimately turn out to be unclaimed and they should be entitled to realise those goods and, subject to any claim, apply the proceeds for the purposes of the administration."
The plantiffs are to present short minutes of order giving effect to these reasons within seven days.
As part of the hearing, BDO Australia has asked the Federal Court to rule that all its court costs be paid out of Mossgreen's limited estate.
BDO's administration has previously been embarrassed in February when incomplete official documents were lodged with ASIC, requiring the lodgement of replacement paperwork after Property Observer pointed out the need for the accountancy firm to lodge the full Report as to Affairs from Administrator document.
ASIC was given a 21 page Report as to Affairs from Administrator to upload for public disclosure, not the full 45 page report.
"We lodge what the director provides us with. It is the director’s RATA, not BDO’s," BDO spokeswoman Rosey McGrath advised.
"A RATA with all attachments was subsequently received and lodged yesterday afternoon," she subsequently advised.
The besieged administrator of collapsed auction house Mossgreen had told clients and buyers it would continue to hold onto the artwork and collectibles until payment of the fee was made subject to court orders.
<div>
BDO administrator James White had previously said the amount of the levy was "not negotiable". ASIC has reportedly not yet raised any concerns in relation to the administrators' conduct.
Clients were also furious that the Sydney administrators took the issue to the Sydney Federal Court, and inconvenienced the mostly Melbourne clients.
The administrators meet quick initial resistance when they told the first meeting of creditors in January that were exploring court judgements on whether a constructive trust arrangement existed.
They indicated BDO would likely approach the courts to rule on the matter.
However this course was challenged by Minter Ellison lawyer Lindsay Powers, on behalf of art collector Michele Asprey, who suggested "this was the clearest case of a trust relationship he has encountered." 
The chairman advised that initial legal advice had been obtained and it was considered necessary to obtain directions from the court "due to the various classes of creditors, the estimated shortfall to creditors and the overall complexity of the matter."
The chairman, James White from BDO, however indicated his personal view was that unsold goods held on consignment remained the property of the vendors. 
Michelle Asprey was among those who presented their argument regarding the $353 levy in the actioned court case over the desired BDO fee.
The Australian Financial Review recently revealed that Paul Sumner's Mossgreen lost money for five years before it went under last December.
At its peak in early 2017, Mossgreen had 55 staff.
Sumner started Mossgreen in 2004 by briefly selling artworks from the walls of his rented Macleay Regis, Potts Point apartment, the same building as the Sydney society family, the Copplesons’ who were among his final auction content vendors. The Coppleson family also made representations to Judge Perram.
Documents obtained by Property Observer indicated Paul Sumner's auction house owes its auction vendors $6.8 million, which is $1 million more than administrators calculated ahead of the first creditors' meeting.
There has not been a second creditors meeting yet held, which is another source of bewilderment by the many auction house vendors.
Toorak businessman Jack Gringlas​ remains the biggest secured creditor, being owed $6 million. 
The administration came December 21 following failed fundraising attempts.
<div title="Page 5">
Sumner, who did not attend the first meeting, blamed the current circumstance on growing "a little bit fast."
There were 330 creditors initially identified at the meeting who were told no law required trust accounts for the auction proceeds.
<div title="Page 5">
The names of the creditors are a who's who from across Australia, ranging from passionate collectors, socialites, low key business tycoons to deceased estates.The biggest unsecured creditor stemmed from the auction of a book collection.
</div>
Some $1.75 million is owed to the family of the late wealthy insurance underwriter Martin Copley who auctioned off the books in October.
His auction items included John Gould's monumental The Birds of Australia, a large folio in eight volumes with 681 hand-coloured lithographed plates, bound in dark green morocco by Riviere, an original subscriber's set, which sold at $446,400 including premium.
The second biggest client was another deceased estate, that of the late South Australian building industry icon Alan Hickinbotham and his late wife Margaret. 
It was billed as the highest value collection ever to be sold in Adelaide when auctioned in May by Mossgreen's chief, Paul Sumner.
Sydney's society Coppleson family were listed as owed $465,000, the third highest-owed creditor.
It followed the sale of the contents of the Macleay Regis penthouse, home of the late esteemed gynaecologist Professor Malcolm Coppleson and his late wife, Patricia, who was Vogue Living’s editor-at-large.
The 172 lots included the sale of a $192,200 Ian Fairweather work which had an $80,000 to $120,000 price guidance. A Tim Maguire fetched $117,800.
Mossgreen's last auction on December 7 last year was the contents of the Sheehy family with just 274 of the 438 lots being sold. The family, who are owed $45,000, inquired at the meeting whether Sumner's passport would be surrendered.
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

BDO told to stop intermeddling in Mossgreen client goods

<html><body>
The Federal Court has imposed civil penalties of $70,000 each on the directors of Storm Financial, Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis, who were previously found by the court to have breached their duties as directors.
They were also disqualified from managing corporations for 7 years.
This draws to a close ASIC's Storm-related litigation, which has included investors receiving compensation in relation to losses suffered on investments made through Storm. 
Storm Financial operated a system of advice, created by the Cassimatises, in which 'Stormified' clients were advised to invest substantial amounts in index funds, using 'double gearing' (Storm Model).  Clients would usually take out a home loan and a margin loan in order to purchase units in index funds, create a 'cash dam' and pay Storm's fees.  Clients were then encouraged to take 'step' investments over time.  In late 2008 and early 2009, many of Storm's clients were in negative equity positions, sustaining significant losses. 
The Townsville based Storm collapsed in early 2009. 
In the original judgment, Justice Edelman had found that a sample of investors who were advised to invest in accordance with the Storm Model, received advice that was inappropriate to their personal circumstances. Each of those investors were over 50 years old, were retired or approaching and planning for retirement, had little or limited income, few assets and had little or no prospect of rebuilding their financial position in the event of suffering significant loss.
Justice Edelman found that the Cassimatises had each engaged in a course of conduct which amounted to one breach of the requirement that they exercise their powers as directors with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would have exercised in that situation.  The maximum penalty for a breach of directors' duties (s180) is $200,000.
ASIC commenced this civil penalty proceeding against the Cassimatises in late 2010. The trial took place between 30 May and 30 June 2016.  In August 2016, Edelman J handed down judgment in relation to liability against the Cassimatises, finding that they had each breached their duties as directors.
In September 2012, ASIC entered into a settlement agreement with the Commonwealth Bank of Australia to make available up to $136 million as compensation for losses suffered on investments made through Storm. The $136 million was in addition to payments of approximately $132 million, and other benefits that CBA had already provided to Storm investors under its Resolution Scheme.
In May 2013 ASIC secured $1.1 million in compensation on behalf of two former Storm investors, Barry and Deanna Doyle.
In May 2013, ASIC intervened in the application for Court approval of the settlement of the related class action brought against Macquarie Bank in respect of Storm as it had concerns about the fairness of the settlement arrangements.  On 12 August 2013, the Full Federal Court agreed that the distribution of the settlement sum was not fair and reasonable to all group members.  Under a revised settlement, Macquarie Bank agreed to pay $82.5 million by way of compensation and costs.
In September 2014, ASIC entered into a settlement agreement with the Bank of Queensland Limited to pay approximately $17 million as compensation for losses suffered on investments made through Storm.
</body></html>

Storm Financial's Emmanuel and Julie Cassimatis cop $70,000 civil penalties

<html><body>
ASIC has released a report setting out the details of the changes made by the big four banks to remove unfair terms from their small business loan contracts of up to $1 million.
The report, Unfair contract terms and small business loans  provides more detailed guidance to bank and non-bank lenders about compliance with the unfair contract terms laws as they relate to small business.
The report follows the announcement in August 2017 that the big four banks had committed to improving terms of their small business loans following work with ASIC and the Australian Small Business and Family Enterprise Ombudsman.
ASIC Deputy Chair Peter Kell said the UCT report provides further guidance to help banks and other lenders ensure that their small business loans are fair, and do not breach the rules prohibiting unfair contract terms.
The report:
<ul>
<li>Identifies the types of terms in loan contracts that raise concerns under the law</li>
<li>Provides details about the specific changes that have been made by the banks to ensure compliance with the law</li>
<li>Provides general guidance to lenders with small business borrowers to help them assess whether loan contracts meet the requirements under the unfair contract terms law</li>
</ul>
"ASIC will review small business lending contracts across the market.
"There are no excuses for failure to comply with the UCT laws, and we will consider all regulatory options available to us if we identify lenders whose unfair contracts break the law."
ASIC will monitor the four banks' use of the clauses to ensure they are not applied or relied on in an unfair way.
ASIC and ASBFEO will continue work together to ensure small business loan contracts comply with the unfair contract terms law.
Unfair contract terms protections were extended to small business from 12 November 2016.
Small business loans are defined as loans of up to $1 million that are provided in standard form contracts to small businesses employing fewer than 20 staff are covered by the legal protections.
In August 2017, ASIC and the ASBFEO welcomed the changes to small business loan contracts by the big four banks that have:
<ul>
<li>Ensured that the contract does not contain ‘entire agreement clauses’ which prevent a small business borrower from relying on statements by bank officers (e.g. about how bank discretions will be exercised)</li>
<li>Limited the operation of broad indemnification clauses</li>
<li>Addressed concerns about event of default clauses, including ‘material adverse change’ events of default and specific events of non-monetary default (e.g. misrepresentations by the borrower)</li>
<li>Limited the circumstances in which financial indicator covenants will be used in small business loans and when breach of a covenant will be considered an event of default</li>
<li>Limited their ability to unilaterally vary contracts to specific circumstances with appropriate advance notice.</li>
</ul>
 
 
</body></html>

ASIC reports on changes to small business loan contracts by big four banks 

<html><body>
<div>
The besieged administrator of collapsed auction house Mossgreen is seeking court orders to justify its controversial $353 collection levy.
Mossgreen clients and buyers were advised it would continue to hold onto the artwork and collectibles subject to court orders.
BDO has also extended the time for payment of the levy and collection of items from March 10 to March 29.  
</div>
<div>
The Australian Financial Review reported ASIC made initial inquiries to BDO about the imposition of the levy after complaints from clients.
<h2>A BDO spokeswoman confirmed BDO was "in dialogue with ASIC".</h2>
<h2>"ASIC has not raised any concerns in relation to the administrators' conduct," she said.</h2>
</div>
<div>
"The court will be asked to make directions and orders in relation to the rights and entitlements of creditors and other stakeholders in goods and funds held by Mossgreen.
"Directions will also be sought in respect of the levy that the administrators have charged," she said.
There were 4322 lots remaining, with the levy set to raise a total of $1.5 million.
</div>
<div>If the court decides the levy is excessive, BDO will refund any difference between the levy and the administrators' reasonable costs, the spokeswoman said.</div>
<div>
BDO administrator James White said the amount of the levy was "not negotiable" as "shortfalls risk further losses to the company and its creditors".
He said the costs include wages, rent, security, insurance, legal fees and administrators' time costs and disbursements.
Clients are frustrated about the levy as it is often more than the value of the item.
Creditors have been concerned at the likely costs in seeking various legal judgements too.
</div>
<div>The Victorian Minister for Consumer Affairs Marlene Kairouz said would be consulting with the Commonwealth about whether regulations need tightening.</div>
<div>Clients who consigned multiple items are being billed thousands of dollars.</div>
<div>
<div>
"I think it's highway robbery," Tom Lowenstein, the high-profile accountant who helps manage the affairs of artist Charles Blackman told the AFR.
Blackman handed 25 drawings to Mossgreen last year for an auction that was due to occur this month.
</div>
<div>Some 4000 Mossgreen clients whose goods were auctioned are owed $6.8 million.</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Asic

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Asic

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News