<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/consolidated-properties">Consolidated Properties Group</a> (CPG) is approaching the launch of its latest Brisbane riverfront development, Castile, on the dress circle Skyring Terrace in Newstead.

VIP buyers are now being engaged, with a full public sales launch coming later this year.

Positioned as the final opportunity to secure a new absolute riverfront residence on the East bank of Newstead, Teneriffe or New Farm, Castile at 47 Skyring Terrace has been designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/woods-bagot">Woods Bagot</a> as a timeless addition to the Brisbane skyline.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=371113]

The name Castile draws on themes of permanence, sophistication and legacy, reflecting a broader vision centred on enduring architecture and timelessness in the rarest of riverfront positions.&nbsp;

CPG Chairman and CEO Don O’Rorke said the project had been envisioned as a future Brisbane icon.&nbsp;

“With 47 metres of direct river frontage and never to be built out views, 47 Skyring Terrace is the definitive address on the Brisbane River,” O’Rorke said.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=150489 project_image_fid=371114]

“Rather than following trend-based apartment design, Castile draws inspiration from Brisbane’s great heritage buildings, reinterpreting classical architecture into a contemporary riverfront landmark designed to stand proudly for the next 100 years,” he said.&nbsp;

The approved development will comprise 227 apartments across a 25-storey tower alongside a boutique six-storey riverfront building of just 12 residences.&nbsp;

Construction is scheduled to commence in September 2026.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=150489]

Joel Robinson

CPG unveils Castile Newstead ahead of upcoming sales launch

Australia’s online shopping habits have shifted dramatically over the last decade. As eCommerce volumes surged, so too did the frustrations that came with traditional parcel delivery: missed deliveries, long Post Office queues, parcel theft and the challenge of being home during business hours.

Australia Post’s Parcel Lockers emerged as one of the more practical responses to that changing consumer behaviour.

What started as a relatively niche delivery option has evolved into a nationwide network of more than 1,400 self-service Parcel Lockers positioned at train stations, shopping centres, supermarkets and Post Offices across the country. The system allows Australians to send, collect and return parcels 24 hours a day, fundamentally changing how many people interact with deliveries.

The appeal is relatively straightforward: flexibility.

Instead of waiting at home for a delivery driver or rushing to a Post Office before closing time, users can direct eligible parcels to a Parcel Locker location of their choice. Once the parcel arrives, Australia Post sends a notification with a collection code or QR access through the AusPost app, allowing customers to retrieve their package at any time within the collection window.

For apartment residents in particular, the system has become increasingly valuable.

Higher-density living has created logistical challenges around deliveries, especially in buildings without concierge services or secure parcel rooms. Missed deliveries are common, while parcel theft has become an increasing concern as online shopping volumes continue to rise.

Australia Post itself has repeatedly highlighted the growing issue of “porch pirates” during peak shopping periods, encouraging customers to use Parcel Lockers as a safer alternative to unattended home deliveries.

That security aspect is one of the key reasons the Australia Post Parcel Locker network has grown so rapidly.

Parcel Lockers are positioned as secure, monitored collection points that reduce the risk of theft while also improving delivery efficiency for Australia Post. Instead of multiple redelivery attempts, parcels can be consolidated into a single secure destination.

The Parcel Lockers themselves are free to use through a MyPost account and support a range of parcel sizes up to 16 kilograms and dimensions of approximately 35 x 44 x 61 centimetres.

Beyond receiving parcels, the system has increasingly become integrated into the broader eCommerce ecosystem.

Customers can now use Parcel Lockers to return online purchases, while retailers have embraced the model as a way to improve delivery success rates and reduce friction in the shopping process. Australia Post has actively expanded partnerships with major retailers and promoted Parcel Lockers as part of a broader out-of-home strategy.

The timing of that expansion aligns with broader changes in Australian shopping behaviour.

The acceleration of online retail during and after the pandemic placed enormous pressure on delivery infrastructure. Parcel volumes reached record highs, particularly during Black Friday and Christmas periods, with Australia Post delivering more than 100 million parcels during peak festive seasons.

That growth forced logistics providers to rethink the “last mile” of delivery, widely regarded as the most expensive and operationally difficult stage of the process.

Parcel Locker systems have increasingly been viewed as part of the long-term solution.

The concept itself is not unique to Australia. Parcel Locker networks have become common globally, particularly across Europe and Asia, where dense urban environments and apartment living create similar logistical challenges. But Australia’s geography and suburban sprawl made adoption slower initially.

Now, however, the convenience factor is driving mainstream usage.

For commuters, Parcel Lockers near train stations allow parcels to be collected on the way home from work. For apartment dwellers, they remove the uncertainty around access and missed deliveries.

The rise of the AusPost app has also streamlined the experience, centralising notifications, tracking and Parcel Locker access into a single platform. Australia Post has increasingly pushed customers toward app-based delivery management, partly as a way to combat phishing scams and fake delivery notifications, which have become more sophisticated in recent years.

The Parcel Locker model is also beginning to influence property development itself.

Parcel management has become a growing consideration in apartment building design, particularly as online shopping becomes embedded in everyday life. Many new residential developments are now incorporating dedicated parcel rooms or Parcel Locker systems into foyers and communal spaces.

For developers, parcel management is increasingly viewed as part of the broader resident amenity offering, alongside gyms, wellness spaces and communal work areas.

That reflects a wider evolution in how residential buildings are designed.

Apartment buyers are placing greater emphasis on convenience, security and operational functionality, particularly in higher-density urban environments. Parcel delivery, once considered a minor operational detail, has become an increasingly important part of that equation.

Australia Post’s Parcel Locker network sits at the centre of that behavioural shift.

What began as a simple alternative delivery option has evolved into a key piece of infrastructure supporting Australia’s growing eCommerce economy and changing urban lifestyles.

And as online shopping continues to expand, the role of Parcel Lockers is likely to become even more embedded in how Australians live, shop and receive goods.

How Australia Post Parcel Lockers changed parcel delivery convenience in Australia

Perth’s new apartment market recorded its strongest quarter of sales since Q4 2021, with 412 apartments sold in Q1 2026 and a record quarterly sold value of $537 million, according to Urbis’ latest Apartment Essentials results.

Urbis said the March quarter result reflects strong, highly product‑specific demand across both ends of the market, from more attainable projects delivering at scale, through to premium stock being absorbed by equity‑rich downsizers.&nbsp;

David Cresp, Partner at Urbis, said the key story in Perth is not demand, it is the market’s ability to convert demand into delivered housing.&nbsp;

“This is the strongest sales quarter since Q4 2021, and it reinforces that demand in Perth is real and it’s local,” David Cresp said. “But the task now is delivery, turning that demand into projects that can actually be built and completed.”&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=110291 project_image_fid=302785]

<h2>Affordable product leads, premium demand remains resilient</h2>

Sales in Q1 were led by more affordable projects, with The Boulevard (SKS Group) recording 115 sales in the quarter, the presentation noting this is only the second time a single project has surpassed 100 quarterly sales. The project was able to offer more affordable housing product right next to a train station.&nbsp;

Palmyra West (Finbar) also delivered strong results with 28 sales in Q1, following 84 sales in Q4, with an average price of under $800,000, underscoring depth of demand for well‑located, attainable new stock.&nbsp;

At the premium end, Urbis said downsizer demand is continuing, with the results highlighting Romeo (Applecross, Finbar) recording 75 sales and reaching almost 50% sold in one quarter.

Jual (Shenton Park, Celsius Property) also posted a strong quarter with 28 sales, reaching 39% sold in one quarter.

Urbis noted that Perth apartment demand is not speculative, not investor‑led, and not uniform, describing it as localised, often equity‑driven and highly product‑specific, a pattern reflected in the polarisation between strong “attainable” performers and premium downsizer product.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=148957 project_image_fid=364102]

<h2>Prices underpinned by costs, and the delivery risk is growing</h2>

Urbis said pricing pressure is cost not demand‑driven: construction costs and delivery risk are now a central constraint, with the results noting build costs remain elevated and volatile, and that energy, fuel and labour uncertainty weigh on feasibility.

David Cresp said a growing challenge for private Build‑to‑Sell developers is simply securing a builder in the current environment.

“Developers are really feeling the pressure from a building market that was operating at capacity and securing a builder is challenging,” David Cresp said, adding that even where a builder can be secured, “trying to get to the price that makes the development financially viable is incredibly challenging in the current market.”&nbsp;

Urbis’ broader WA commentary also notes that industry remains at or above capacity with lot and housing creation, and that many builders are limiting new sales to manage stretched workforces and fixed‑price contract pressures, conditions that flow directly into apartment feasibility and delivery timing.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108869 project_image_fid=317905]

<h2>Supply: improving later, but still constrained, and Perth lags eastern benchmarks</h2>

While near‑term supply remains constrained, Urbis’ forecast shows completions lifting “Supply is forecast to be back above 1,500 apartments per annum for the first time since 2019”, with 1,775 completions forecast for 2026, and volumes remaining above that level over the following years.&nbsp;

Looking further ahead, completions are forecast to reach 2,500 in 2028, with the report noting 32% of that total is social/affordable, reflecting the role of government‑supported delivery in rebuilding the pipeline.&nbsp;

However, Urbis said Perth remains behind comparable markets on pipeline scale. In a national comparison of projects under construction, the report shows under construction Perth Build‑to‑Sell (BTS) at 3,446 apartments versus the Gold Coast at 7,922. Mr Cresp said “The challenge for Perth is how to we grow the delivery pipeline”.

Urbis’ conclusion is that Perth’s market is increasingly defined by product discipline and delivery certainty, with the research identifying “delivery certainty is key” and calling out builder risk and procurement models as core success factors, alongside “timing and staging”.&nbsp;

Perth apartment sales hit strongest pace since late 2021 as builder capacity tightens

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/sammut-developments">Sammut Group</a> has secured development approval for its latest Brisbane apartment project, marking the Sydney developer’s next step in expanding its Queensland pipeline following the success of its debut Gold Coast development, Coast.

The approved project at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/44-glen-road-toowong-qld-4066">44 Glen Road, </a><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/toowong-qld-4066">Toowong</a> will deliver a 15-storey riverfront apartment building with 42 residences, significantly increasing the scale of the site’s previous approval for a smaller luxury scheme. Designed by Bureau^proberts, the development will comprise a mix of predominantly four-bedroom and two-bedroom apartments positioned to maximise Brisbane River and city views.

Sammut Director Julian Sammut said the group had been actively searching Brisbane for several years before identifying Toowong as the right fit.

“Brisbane was the right step for Sammut,” Sammut said.

“With the success of Coast we thought we should definitely look to do more in Queensland alone. We then pushed up to look at Brisbane. We've been looking for I'd say two to three years actually and it was hard to find the right location.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/f_auto,c_limit,w_1440,q_75/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/field/image/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.14%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=dYAVIL7qdcGA8ojvkslSrLjczXFejSSx" />

Sammut said suburbs including New Farm and Teneriffe were considered before the group ultimately focused on Toowong due to its strong downsizer demographic and limited supply of developable riverfront land.

The site was acquired off-market after what Sammut described as a lengthy negotiation and planning process, with the developer pursuing an uplift to the original approval.

“We are DA approved now which is very exciting,” Sammut said.

“We've had our change approval come through and we've obviously doubled the height, 15 storeys plus rooftop. We've got 42 amazing apartments that are going to be coming to market soon.”

<img alt="Sammut makes Brisbane apartment play" data-entity-type="" data-entity-uuid="" src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,dpr_2.0,q_auto:good/https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202025-12-23%20at%203.27.26%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=ohkRkY0dIZlqdfME2EZePsCQavRiBadE" />

Bureau^proberts said the design responds to Toowong’s evolving urban character, balancing contemporary apartment living with the area’s established residential identity.

“A place where traditional Queensland living has taken place for centuries; Toowong is seeing a shift of contemporary influence, commercial and retail hubs mixed with well-considered residential offerings – all the while maintaining its character and charm,” the architect noted in planning documents submitted to Brisbane City Council.

The architecture practice said the project’s form was shaped by its riverfront setting, flood considerations, neighbouring building scales, and view corridors.

“They said the mix of four and two-bedroom apartments capture the ‘fundamental qualities of Queenslander living,’ translated into the context of a contemporary subtropical building.”

The development sits just off Coronation Drive within walking distance of Toowong’s retail precinct and the upgraded Regatta ferry terminal, while also benefiting from proximity to the incoming green bridge connection to West End. Sammut said the accessibility and amenity offering were central to the site’s appeal.

The approval adds to growing residential activity along the Toowong riverfront, joining nearby projects including Consolidated Properties’ Monarch Residences and Spyre Group’s ARC Residences.

Sammut secures approval for debut Brisbane apartment development in Toowong

Developer Lanevick is heading back into Sydney’s apartment market after focusing more heavily on the luxury townhouse and terrace sector in recent years.

Lanevick, founded and directed by Steve Maroun, is expecting to receive approval in the coming months for a new apartment development in Gladesville, with the aim to launch it to the market later this year.

The 51-apartment project, designed by Studio Johnston, will comprise a mix of one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments positioned toward the Hunters Hill downsizer market.

“Traditionally it’s been difficult for people in that market to downsize because there just hasn’t been the right product available,” Maroun said.

“We’re targeting buyers who might have 30 to 40 per cent of their house value sitting in the bank after downsizing.

“They still want good spacious entertaining areas, they still want quality design, but they also want flexibility and the ability to enjoy life a bit more after working hard for a long time.”

The project sits near Boronia Park and within close proximity to the Parramatta River foreshore, an area Maroun says offers more of a Hunters Hill lifestyle than a traditional apartment precinct.

“From a lifestyle perspective, it’s really more Hunters Hill than Gladesville,” Maroun said. “You’re close to the foreshore, close to parklands, and still connected back into the village precinct.”

From level four and above, apartments will capture water views&nbsp;toward Sydney Harbour. Communal amenity will include rooftop entertaining areas, wellness spaces, and a gym tailored toward owner-occupier buyers.

“We’ve really designed these apartments around that buyer coming from the Hunters Hill LGA and what they’re actually looking for in their next chapter.”

The proposed development has also been designed to respond to the changing character of the broader Gladesville town centre, where a growing number of mixed-use and residential proposals are expected to emerge over the coming years.

“Gladesville presented a rare opportunity to deliver a genuinely design-led residential project within an evolving lifestyle precinct, just moments from the growing Gladesville town centre, and we’ve approached the project with a strong focus on architecture, liveability and long-term community value,” Maroun said.

Maroun said Lanevick saw a first-mover advantage within the precinct as planning controls continue to evolve to accommodate greater housing density.

“We think there’s a real opportunity there that hasn’t really been serviced properly yet,” he said.

“There’s going to be a broader evolution of the whole Gladesville village precinct over time, particularly with more activation and mixed-use outcomes.”

The Venus Street proposal will include a commercial and retail component at ground level designed to contribute to that evolving streetscape activation.

“A big part of the thinking was how do you activate that area properly and create more vibrancy and amenity, which is what Hunters Hill has been looking for,” Maroun said.

Lanevick’s focus since 2020 has largely been on smaller-scale luxury townhouse and terrace developments. The developer recently completed Royale Randwick, also designed by Studio Johnston, where prices reached $3.65 million. The project was featured in the UDIA NSW 2026 Professional Development Prospectus and was also named a finalist for Development of the Year.

&nbsp;

Lanevick to cater for Hunters Hill downsizers with new Gladesville apartment development

Capital Gains Tax

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The issue of negative gearing has roared to the centre of our national political debate.
Last weekend Labor leader Bill Shorten announced major changes to negative gearing and to capital gains tax. The Parliamentary Budget Office estimates that Labor’s policy could raise $32 billion over 10 years.
These are risky changes for our industry and for the economy given they come at a time when growth is so delicately poised.
Major changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax would have far-reaching effects throughout the economy. If enacted, Labor’s policy will distort the market, hit rents, hurt jobs and make it so much harder for families to plan their economic futures – all this without any modelling of its impact on rents, construction levels, jobs or state budgets.
However, it is not only the Opposition that is being tempted by the possibility of big new tax licks.
As yet, we do not have clarity over the Turnbull Government’s position on property taxes. While some frontbenchers and backbenchers have expressed support for the existing system of negative gearing, the Government’s position appears to be fluid.
That’s why the Property Council is putting the case to politicians of all political backgrounds not to damage an industry that supports 1.1 million jobs throughout the economy and generates one ninth of our national income.
Two million Australians own an investment property. Property has always been part of the ‘Australian dream’ and it has been a proven means for Australians on middle incomes to build their wealth.
Playing around with negative gearing policy doesn’t make sense and it’s sure not worth the economic risk.
 
Ken Morrison is the Chief Executive of the Property Council of Australia and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertycouncil.com.au" target="_blank">here.</a>
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Negative gearing changes not worth the risk: PCA's Ken Morrison

<html><body>
In their submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, the Australia Institute state not only is current tax treatment putting upward pressure on house prices but are also encouraging speculative behaviour and increasing the chances of property bubbles and financial instability. 
"Negative gearing has been a part of the Australian tax system from early last century. In the context of residential housing investment it allows property investors to write off any losses against their taxable income from other sources. This effectively means that the tax payer is paying for some of the loss. 
"The CGT discount was introduced in 1999 and means that for assets held for more than a year only 50% of the capital gain is taxed. This decreased the amount of CGT paid, and means capital gains become increasingly important to property investment."
The effect of the GCT discount can be seen in the Net rental income table 1995-2013.
<a href="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%202.26.13%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%202.26.13%20PM.png" alt="">
"After the introduction of the CGT discount net rental income collapsed. Investors were willing to take on significantly larger losses at a time when they could keep a larger slice of the capital gain. 
"In a normal investment market if the return on the asset was going down because the price of the asset was rising then this would be a signal to investors that it could be overvalued and would decrease the interest in investing. 
"But an interest in capital gain means that a rising price is a signal to enter the market because future capital gain is likely. Such a situation makes speculative bubbles more likely. 
"While middle and lower income households are being increasingly shut out of home ownership, most of the benefits of negative gearing and the CGT discount flow to high income households. 
"Modelling done by NATSEM for the Australia Institute shows that 55 per cent of the benefits of negative gearing and the CGT discount flow to high income households, while 50% of families only get 13% of the benefit. Figure 3 shows the income distribution of the negative gearing and CGT discount benefits. 
<a href="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%202.28.03%20PM.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2015/08/26/Screen%20Shot%202015-08-26%20at%202.28.03%20PM.png" alt="">
The Australia Institute does not believe that changes made to negative gearing would decrease investment and increase house prices. AI claims that there is already little investment into property with just six per cent of investment finance going to new housing.
"The other 94% is spent on existing stock. If the objective of negative gearing is to encourage new housing then this could be achieved by restricting negative gearing to apply only to new housing. 
"The Australia Institute proposes that negative gearing is restricted to new housing stock and only for a period of 10 years.
"The CGT discount replaced a system where capital gains were discounted by the inflation rate. The argument for the CGT discount is that it is a simpler method for calculating and taxing the real capital gain. 
"The broader question that should be considered is why we tax real capital gains but level all other taxes on the nominal gain. For example, interest earned on money is taxed at the nominal interest rate rather than the real interest rate. 
"Given that all other taxes are levelled on the nominal gain and not the real gain there is little justification that capital gains should be taxed differently. The Australia Institute proposes that the CGT discount should be abolished. 
"These changes will have a number of effects. It will decrease demand for housing and hence put downward pressure on house prices as potential investors pick other investment opportunities. 
"It creates a bigger incentive for new housing. It reduces the speculation in the residential housing market, making property bubbles and financial instability less likely. Finally it will raise $7.4 billion a year in revenue at a time when the government is trying to decrease the budget deficit."
 
The Australia Institute report outlined the case for abolishing the capital gains tax discount – not capital gains tax as previously headlined.
</body></html>

Abolish capital gains tax discount: Australia Institute

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I have had an investment property for the past seven years that is negatively geared in the inner Melbourne Inner East. 
The house is very old and has had numerous problems due to its age. We are looking at demolishing this house and rebuilding a new home.
 On completion of construction, our intent is to either rent it out or making this our principle place of residence (PPOR) if we can't rent it out. 
Could you please advise, if we decide to sell it in a few years' time (after we have used it as a PPOR), would we be liable for capital gains tax (CGT) or is there a sunset clause after which CGT does not apply? 
Regards,
David
Hi David
It would seem that CGT, when it applies and whether there are time limits or statutes on it, is one of the most misunderstood areas of our tax law that there is.
In your case, the property you refer to has been your investment property since around 2008, and therefore it is well within the era that CGT is charged on any property which is not your PPOR.
Being rented out is not a criteria which must apply. Whether it is rented or not, if it isn't your own home, CGT applies (unless it started out as being your own home and then you moved out). 
Under these circumstances you may qualify for the six year rule exemption, which allows you to move out for a period of up to six years and not incur any CGT if you subsequently move back in or sell.  This of course depends upon you not claiming this exemption on any other property - you can only have one exempted property at a time.
If you were to move in to this property, and had only this property on which your principal place of residence exemption was placed, it would not matter how long you stayed in it, there would still be some assessable gain for the period of time it was not your PPOR.  This is because it was an investment when you bought it and no amount of living in it can wipe this fact away.
If you go down this pathway you must keep accurate records of your purchase price and everything you spend on the property, so that pro-rated capital gains tax can be established when the time come for you to finally sell the property.
Regards,
Maragret
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
Please not that due to the number of requests, Margaret may not be able to answer every question.
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: Will CGT still apply if I move into my investment property?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I just read your recent reply on <a href="/news">moving out of your home and the capital gain tax that may come with it</a>.
Wonder if you could help me with this.
Just to clarify, if I stayed in my home for three years and if I sell it 10 years after moving out from it, and I have no other home, I would have to pay 4/13 of the net captital gain (method one)?
Can I get a valuation after the six years is up an calculate the gain from that date and pay tax on the difference (method two)?
I think the Australian Tax Office (ATO) website seems to deal with method one. Is method two also possible?  My six years is up in a years time and I am contemplating whether to sell since I live overseas.
Regards,
Shanthi
Hi Shanthi,
This part of the tax rules can be very confusing - and can be really hard to wrap your head around.  Where tax is concerned its really important that you contact an accountant, tell him or her your exact situation and tell him or her just how the rules apply to you, and what you will pay.
I have checked with Ian Rodrigues, my Property Success team member and tax specialist, and we talked your situation through.
You can choose to treat a property as your main residence even after you move out provided you do not choose another property as a main residence during that period and it is not rented.  This means that, if you didn’t own anything else, and you didn’t rent out this property, you can keep the main residence exemption on it indefinitely and pay no capital gains tax.
If it is rented out, however, the maximum period you can treat it as your main residence after you move out is six years.  You can move back in during the six years and the six year period will reset. If you continue to own the property after the six year period has expired,  you only get a partial exemption.
In your example, if you lived in it for three years, and then rented it for 10 years, you would have to pay capital gains tax on 4/13th of the gain.
You can't use a valuation after the six years for the basis of calculating the capital gain , but you are able to use a valuation at the date it ceased to be your main residence.  In your case, this was three years after you purchased it. The capital gain would  then be calculated as 4/10th of any gain over that market value.
You will need to get a qualified valuer to provide you that retrospective valuation if you don't have one from that time - the ATO is unlikely to accept a market opinion from a real estate agent where no valuing qualifications are held.
Again I stress that you should discuss this with an accountant who has a good grasp of capital gains tax and main residence exemptions.
Have a property question?   <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: How do I work out how much CGT I will pay on renting out my old home?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
My partner brought a block of land in 2011. 
We were wondering whether we have a limited time to build a home before capital gains tax (CGT) is applicable to us?
Thanks in advance,
Ryan
Hi Ryan,
I am assuming that you purchased this block of land with the intent to build a property in which you will personally live, rather than build a property as an investment.  If it is to build as an investment, then of course CGT is going to apply immediately from the date of your contract to buy.
If you bought to build a house of your own on, the tax office <a href="https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Capital-gains-tax/In-detail/Real-estate/Treating-land-as-your-main-residence/" target="_blank">has this to say</a>:
"Generally, if you build a dwelling on land you already own, the land does not qualify for exemption until the dwelling becomes your main residence for capital gains tax (CGT) purposes.
"Vacant land may also be treated as your main residence if it is vacant because your home has been destroyed.
"However, you can choose to treat land as your main residence for up to four years before the dwelling becomes your main residence in certain circumstances. You can choose to have this exemption apply if you acquire an ownership interest (other than a life interest) in land and you:
<ul>
<li>
"Build a dwelling on the land
</li>
<li>"Repair or renovate an existing dwelling on the land, or </li>
<li>"Finish a partly constructed dwelling on the land.</li>
</ul>
"There are a number of conditions that you must satisfy before you can claim the exemption. You must first finish building, repairing or renovating the dwelling and then:
<ul>
<li>"Move into the dwelling as soon as practicable after it is finished, and continue to use the dwelling as your main residence for at least three months after it becomes your main residence."</li>
</ul>
Reading this it would appear that, as long as you do not own another property on which you are also claiming the principal place of residence exemption, you have four years to have the house ready to move into.  
Make sure you check with your accountant to see how this might apply to you though, as your personal circumstances may be very different.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Is there a time limit to build on land before CGT applies?

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
The capital gains tax laws are voluminous and complicated. But they also contain benefits for taxpayers.
Legislation introduced in federal Parliament last week – the Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2014 Measures No 7) Bill 2014 – will amend the tax law to ensure that CGT exemption is available in respect of compensation or damages received by:
<ul>
<li>a trustee (other than a trustee of a complying super fund) for a wrong or injury a beneficiary suffers in their occupation, or a wrong, injury or illness a beneficiary or their relative suffers personally - and a beneficiary that subsequently receives a distribution that is attributable to such compensation or damages from the trustee; 
</li>
<li>a taxpayer for a policy of insurance on the life of an individual or an annuity instrument if the taxpayer is the original owner of the policy or instrument; and 
</li>
<li>a trustee of a complying super fund for a policy of insurance for an individual's illness or injury.</li>
</ul>
The government said it was intended that trustees or beneficiaries who receive compensation or damages in respect of certain events (such as an injury an individual suffers at work) or in respect of certain policies of insurance (such as illness, injury or death) not be subject to CGT.
However, the express wording of the relevant provisions in the tax law had created uncertainty about this treatment. It was also intended that insurance policies held by complying superannuation funds for injuries and illnesses suffered by an individual not be subject to CGT. So the legislation now introduced seeks to implement those original intentions.
Under the proposed changes, a capital gain or loss made by a trustee in relation to compensation or damages for any wrong or injury a beneficiary of the trust suffers in their occupation, or any wrong, injury or illness a beneficiary of the trust or their relative suffers personally, will be disregarded. Further, a capital gain or loss made by a beneficiary will also be disregarded if the trustee of a trust then distributes money, property or other CGT assets to the beneficiary attributable to the compensation or damages received by the trustee.
Take the following example.
Robert is the beneficiary of ABC trust, which was established after Robert fell off a roof whilst working for Roofing Inc and suffered serious injuries. Patrick, as trustee of ABC trust, seeks compensation on behalf of Robert from Roofing Inc's insurance company, and receives compensation for the accident.
Under the proposed law, the capital gain made by Patrick in relation to the compensation received will be disregarded.
Assume Robert recovers from his injuries, but requires substantial further medical and other support. Patrick, as trustee of ABC trust, distributes the compensation to Robert to assist in paying his hospital bills. Any capital gain made by Robert in relation to the compensation received will be disregarded.
The bill also proposes that a capital gain or capital loss made from a CGT event happening to an interest in a policy of insurance on the life of an individual or an annuity instrument is disregarded by the original owner of the policy or instrument.
Another example will help explain this.
Fred holds a life insurance policy from an insurance company. Fred passes away and his wife Jane, as executor of his estate, receives $200,000 from the insurance company in respect of the policy. Jane, as executor of Fred's estate pays $50,000 to Alice, a beneficiary of Fred's estate. The payment to Alice is attributable to the amount received by Fred's estate in respect of the life insurance policy.
Any capital gain made by Alice, as a beneficiary of Fred's estate, will be disregarded.
The amendments will apply retrospectively in relation to CGT events happening in the 2005-06 and later income years i.e. generally from 1 July 2005. Accordingly, the tax law has also been amended to ensure that taxpayers are given sufficient time to seek an amendment to previous assessments (as the amendment period will otherwise have expired in some cases), if required in these circumstances.
The government says the amendments are consistent with the administrative practice of the Commissioner of Taxation and ensure that taxpayers that could have benefited by relying on the Commissioner’s administrative practice are not disadvantaged by the changes.
The bill will not be debated until after Parliament resumes in February 2015, but the changes are welcome.
Terry Hayes is the editor-in-chief of tax news reporting at <a href="https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/" target="_blank">Thomson Reuters</a>, a leading Australian provider of tax, accounting and legal information solutions.
Thomson Reuters <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/the-australian-tax-handbook-tax-return-edition-2014/productdetail/121906" target="_blank">Australian Tax Handbook 2014 – Tax Return Edition</a> provides information on claiming all kinds of tax deductions, including the rules relating to claiming rental properties and work-related expenses.
This article first appeared on <a href="https://www.smartcompany.com.au/" target="_blank">SmartCompany</a>.
</body></html>

thayes-XhNcNKLNWa

How CGT changes to exemptions on compensation or damages could benefit taxpayers 

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I was reading about Capital Gains Tax (CGT) on principal residences and I was wondering if CGT is applicable on an elderly parent’s home after they have moved to a nursing home. If the home is rented out to pay for the ongoing expenses of nursing care, is CGT applicable after she has passed and the home is sold? Alternatively, if a family member lives in the home until such time as she passes, is capital gains also applicable?
Presently there is family division (as usual) about the way her assets and home should be managed.
Regards,
Katherine
Margaret Lomas' answer is on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Capital gains tax is a complicated issue, and I wanted to be sure I got this right for you, so I called my Property Success resident tax expert, Ian Rodrigues, and checked that my understanding around this was correct.
If you own a Principal Place of Residence (PPOR) from which you are absent and you rent it out, you have a six year period where you can have an exemption from CGT, as long as you don’t claim another PPOR exemption. 
If you don’t rent it out, the amount of time that you can claim that exemption is unlimited. This would mean that, as long as the period did not exceed 6 years, renting it out in order to help pay those expenses would be OK. 
Once she passes, the status of the person’s CGT position shifts to those who inherit – if it is still considered her PPOR (so in that six year period) then the CGT status transfers, and the beneficiaries have two years to sell before they incur CGT.
If a family member lived there, and it was to simply take care of the place for your mother, and not a market based arrangement on the same terms as a third party tenant, then this would likely be considered to be the same as if no one lived there.
Of course, if your mother bought the property prior to 19 September, 1985, then all of the above is moot – it’s a pre CGT asset anyway and no CGT applies in any circumstance.
Always check with a good accountant or even the tax office itself though, to ensure that your own situation is covered by these rules.  It’s quite easy to get a private ruling in the event that no one seems sure and that way, you have it all in writing!
Have a property question?  <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

Ask Margaret: Is CGT applicable if an elderly resident moves to a nursing home?

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I am going to sell my family home and move into a new home.
But it's taking time to sell, so I wanted to take my first home off the market for a while and move into the new one, then sell at a later date. 
I won’t rent out my former home, so will I avoid CGT? 
Kind regards,
Andrea
Hi Andrea,
Capital gains tax (CGT) is one of the most misunderstood concepts in property investing, but in reality it’s quite simple.
CGT is not about whether you rent out a property or not, and many assets attract CGT even though they don’t produce income for you. When it comes to CGT on your family home, it is all about which property you intend to claim as your principal place of residence (PPOR), and you can only claim one. Any other property you own, regardless of if it is rented out or not, will accrue CGT. The value that becomes the cost base upon which the gain is calculated will depend on a host of things, from when it was purchased through to when it ceased being your principal place of residence exemption.
You can move out of your  PPOR for up to six years and still maintain an exemption on it, as long as you don’t have another property for which you claim that exemption. This allows home owners to be relocated for work, or move out and rent for a time, without CGT accruing. Remember that if you buy another property in that time, you must nominate one as your PPOR, and your intention for the nominated property is that it must be genuinely a home you have intention to reside in.
You are allowed a six-month overlap, however, so that you have time to move and set up a new principal place of residence.  Be very careful on this one, though – if you go over the six months  by even one day you may end up paying some CGT on the family home, calculated in most cases on the change in value form the day you moved out until the day it sells. This might be OK if the value has not increased since you moved out, but if there has been any type of value increase since you left it, you could be up for some tax.
Try not to be too alarmed – remember  CGT is incurred on only half the gain (as long as it has been held as an asset over 12 months) and although it is tacked on to the top of your other income and calculated at your highest marginal rate of tax, this may be a fairly small amount after all.
Have a property question? <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au">Ask Margaret!</a>
This article was first published on Property Observer in February 2013.
</body></html>

Can I avoid CGT when I sell my home? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
Intention is the magic ingredient that dictates how a gain from subdivision is taxed, explains Property Tax Specialists’ Shukri Barbara.
If your intention is to realize the capital gain in a property then you will be taxed differently to if your intention is to make a profit in some fashion.
Barbara provides an example of a situation where the property is used as a main residence only. In 2013, the value has increased to $490,000 – when it was purchased in 2005 it cost $250,000.
They subdivide the block, and then sell the vacant land.
Barbara explains that for this specific situation, the gain is capital – with a 50% discount available as it is a “mere realization” of capital. In this case, the cost base of the vacant block would be based on the valuation from a valuer, the Development Application (DA) costs and any improvement required by council.
He suggests to only subdivide when ready to sell, as it allows the owner to maintain the capital gain exempt status for longest, as subdividing demonstrates intention as it is solely to realize capital gains.
Subdividing early and “waiting” is an indication of intention to a profit making undertaking, he warns.
It’s also worth noting that knocking down the main residence before selling significant changes the character of the asset, and may see capital gain tax (CGT) payable. Similarly, registering for GST can also be an indication of an intention to make profit.
Here’s another example:
A couple acquire a house in 2012 and lodge a DA in 2013 to knock down the existing houe, subdivide land and construct two townhouses.
The intention – that key word again – is to occupy one as the main residence, and sell the other one to help fund the main residence.
The owners have no background in building or associated industries and no history of development.
Barbara explains that in this situation it is likely the new main residence is exempt from CGT if it is established as main residence on purchase and is occupied for a period of, say, three months.
It must also be re-occupied within four years and the dwelling must be used for at least three months after completion.
If it is not treated in this way, CGT will be apportioned over time owned.
On the second part of the property, it will be taxed as business income.
GST implications include registration, GST on a portion of the sale price, credits on materials and services on purchase.
Barbara explains that if you sell the vacant block without development it is likely to be a capital 50% discount.
However, constructing and renting out the second block shows intention of investment, which on a later sale may access 50% discount but includes issues such as cash flow.
In fact, planning is critical. In some situations, Barbara notes that the numbers may actually find the after tax position preferably with the sale of the second block vacant rather than developed.
Barbara also warns that subdivisions cannot take place in a self-managed super fund for a number of reasons, mainly because it is high risk.
He notes that the intention is not required to be formally recorded anywhere, and the tax office bases intention on the way that the actions are taken out.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Why CGT and subdivision is all about intention: Property Tax Specialists

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
I was reading one of your articles. 
I'm wondering: Say I purchase my first property but don't live there. Instead, I rent it out for income. Say 10 years later, when I sell this property, how do I avoid paying Capital Gains Tax (CGT) - assuming this is my only property in the next 10 years?
What would happen if I make deduction on the interest of the loan, or do not making any deduction at all? Is the latter legal, from the ATO's point of view?
Thanks. Wesley
To read Margaret's answer, click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
When you own, and occupy, a home of your own, you may claim a 'principal place of residence' exemption on that property.
This means that, when you sell the property, you will not pay any capital gains tax on any gain you have made.
Further, if you move out of your principal place of residence (PPOR), you may rent it out, and claim any related tax deductions, for a period of up to six years and, as long as you either move back in, or sell it, before those six years are up you also will not pay any CGT. The only catch is that, during this 6 years you cannot own another property on which you would like to claim the exemption – you can only claim one exemption at a time.
The operative word here is 'own and occupy'. If you buy a property and you do not move into it as soon as it settles, then the property is not considered to be your principal place of residence until such times as you do move in, regardless of whether it is the only property you own, or not.
While you can move in at any stage and make it your PPOR, thus invoking a potential six year rule exemption at a future date when you move out, the fact that you did not live there from the moment you owned it changes a few things. You have to keep all of your records accurately on everything you spend, and then when the time comes to sell, your CGT liability must be worked out proportionately for days rented/days not rented.
Your cost base would be the cost base as at the date you bought it and then the gain is apportioned after the six year period is accounted for.
This can easily be overcome, as long as, when you buy the property, your intention is to live there and you move in when you settle, thus establishing the property as your PPOR. 
If, at a later date, your plans change and you move out, the six year period can commence, and your cost base for CGT would be the value as at the date the 6 years expire, if you don't move back in.  You can reset a new 6 year period at the end of the first by moving back in for a time.
Note that the tax office does not prescribe how long you have to stay there on either occasion – it just has to be your intention to live there and you must move in.
 
 
</body></html>

Capital Gains Tax

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Capital Gains Tax

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News