<html><body>
A four bedroom, three bathroom trophy home at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-qld-palm+beach-128773070">241 Jefferson Lane</a>, Palm Beach has quickly gone under contract just days before going under the hammer on July 29.
There's been no revealed sale price.
But the 413 square metre holding was sold for $3.53 million through Ray White last February.
It is again being sold through Ray White.
Marketed by Troy Dowker as a '"magical abode to invest in everlasting memories with family and friends or a home for rejuvenation to create moments worth reminiscing" the home, set over two levels features a fenced beachfront yard and "designer finishes".
The house is close to many amenities including cafes, public transport and several schools.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Jefferson Lane, Palm Beach trophy offering back on the market

<html><body>
The Sydney rental market has recorded the highest vacancy rate in at least 13 years according to SQM Research with 19,500 landlords seeking tenants.
Sydney’s rental vacancy rate rose to 2.8% in June with an estimated 19,572 residential rental dwellings sitting vacant and available for rent.
The vacancy rate rose from 2.5% recorded in May and 2% recorded in June 2017.
The 2.8% is the highest rental vacancy rate since at least 2005 when SQM Research commenced record keeping of rental listings. 
Nationally, the residential rental vacancy rate rose to 2.3% in June (from 2.1% recorded in May) with the number of vacancies Australia-wide now sitting at 75,757 properties.
Most cities recorded a rise with Melbourne rising to 1.6%, Brisbane to 3.0%, Canberra to 0.9% and Adelaide rising to 1.5%. Rental vacancies remained steady in Perth (4.1%), Darwin (3.5%) and Hobart (0.7%)
It should be noted that there tends to be a seasonal rise in rental vacancies for the major capital cities during the month of June. However it is SQM’s view that the rise recorded in Sydney goes beyond seasonal factors.  
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" width="12%">
City
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="13%">
June 2017 Vacancies
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="14%">
Vacancy Rate
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="15%">
May 2018 Vacancies
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="14%">
Vacancy Rate
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="15%">
June 2018 Vacancies
</td>
<td valign="bottom" width="14%">
Vacancy Rate
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Adelaide
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
3,251
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.8%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
2,468
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.3%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
2,726
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.5%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Perth
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
10,638
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
5.4%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
8,235
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
4.1%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
8,426
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
4.1%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Melbourne
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
8,754
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.6%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
7,676
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.4%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
9,035
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.6%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Brisbane
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
11,497
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
3.6%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
9,331
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.9%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
9,886
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
3.0%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Canberra
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
731
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
1.2%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
498
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
0.8%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
565
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
0.9%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Sydney
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
13,215
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.0%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
17,164
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.5%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
19,572
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.8%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Darwin
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
961
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
3.3%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
1,051
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
3.5%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
1,062
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
3.5%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
Hobart
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
190
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
0.7%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
211
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
0.7%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
221
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
0.7%
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="12%">
National
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="13%">
78,314
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.5%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
69,152
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.1%
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="15%">
75,757
</td>
<td valign="bottom" nowrap width="14%">
2.3%
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
 
SQM’s calculations of vacancies are based on online rental listings that have been advertised for three weeks or more compared to the total number of established rental properties.
SQM considers this to be a superior methodology compared to using a potentially incomplete sample of agency surveys or merely relying on raw online listings advertised.  
Capital city asking rents for houses fell over the month to 12 July 2018 by 0.4% to $549 a week. Unit asking rents remain steady at $444 a week. Over the year, asking house rents rose just 0.5%, while unit asking rents rose modestly by 0.9%.
While the asking rent for a three-bedroom house in Sydney remains the highest in the nation at $709 a week, rents fell 0.8% over the month to 12 July, with the upward trend in the vacancy rate easing pricing pressures. Asking unit rents in Sydney now stand at $522 a week, down by 0.2% over the month. Sydney was the only city to record falls in rents for the year with rents for houses down by 2.2% and units down by 0.1%
Canberra also recorded monthly falls in rents for both houses (0.1%) and units (2.5%) however rents are well up by 13% over the past 12 months for houses. Melbourne’s house rents fell by 1.3% for the month but unit rents rose marginally by 0.1%.
Brisbane, Darwin, Adelaide and Perth house rents continue to register small increases in the past 30 days.  However, rents for units in Adelaide fell by 0.2%, making it the cheapest capital city to rent a unit at $299.60 a week.  Adelaide is also the cheapest capital city to rent a house, with the asking rent sitting at $383.10 a week, although there is an increase of 0.9% for June.
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="6" valign="top" width="100%">
SQM Research Weekly Rents Index
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" width="39%">
Week ending - 12 Jul 2018
</td>
<td width="10%">
Rent
</td>
<td width="16%">
Change on previous week
</td>
<td width="16%">
Rolling month % change
</td>
<td width="17%">
12 month % change
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Canberra
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
630.7
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-2.7  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.1%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
13.0%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
439.6
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-1.6  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-2.5%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
6.6%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Sydney
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
709.2
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.2  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.8%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
-2.2%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
521.7
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.7  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.2%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
-0.1%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Darwin
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
540.9
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.1  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.4%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
5.8%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
405.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.0  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.5%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
1.9%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Brisbane
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
451.9
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.1  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.5%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
2.0%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
370.4
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.6  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.3%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
0.8%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Adelaide
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
383.1
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.9  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.9%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
2.1%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
299.6
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.6  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.2%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
3.5%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Hobart
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
398.6
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.6  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.3%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
8.5%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
347.3
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.3  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.9%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
10.4%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Melbourne
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
522.6
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.6  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-1.3%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
2.2%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
411.8
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.2  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.1%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
2.6%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Perth
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
424.5
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.5  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.8%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
0.2%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
326.1
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.9  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.5%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
-0.4%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
National
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
432.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-1.0  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.5%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
1.2%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
355.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
1.0  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-1.1%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
1.7%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top" width="24%">
Cap City Average
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Houses
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
549.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
1.0  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
-0.4%  
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
0.5%  
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="14%">
All Units
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="10%">
444.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.0
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="16%">
0.0%
</td>
<td valign="top" nowrap width="17%">
0.9%  
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
 
 
</body></html>

SQM calculates highest ever number of Sydney landlords without tenants

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Australia’s population is set to reach 25 million in the coming weeks. This is much earlier than expected. Eighteen years ago, projections estimated Australia’s population wouldn’t get to 25 million until 2041.
Western Australian Liberal Senator Dean Smith last week proposed a moratorium on immigration to give Australia some time to “breathe” and take stock. Claiming concerns over planning and infrastructure failing to meet population needs, Smith signalled Australia was unprepared, having relied on inaccurate population projections.
Immigration is often targeted when population levels seem out of control. But will a moratorium give Australia the supposed breathing space it needs?
Migration impacts
Concerns about immigration and a perceived population crisis have crossed over the spectrum of Australian politics. One Nation’s Pauline Hanson has called for a plebiscite on immigration, while Labor leader Bill Shorten has raised concerns about the number of temporary migrants in Australia.
Immigration Minister Peter Dutton has said a cut to immigration numbers would have economic benefits, contradicting Treasurer Scott Morrison. And Smith’s idea to halt immigration to allow the nation’s infrastructure time to catch up with population demand is shared by prominent public figures, including Bob Carr and Dick Smith.
Australia’s population is ageing, which has potential adverse consequences for the future as proportionally more people exit the workforce, increasing reliance on a shrinking income taxpayer base. Immigration has the potential to offset these consequences of population ageing by contributing to the workforce and to government funds for essential services. Migrants also contribute to Australia’s future population by having children.
The latest available research suggests immigration levels at “about 160,000 and 210,000 seem to have the ‘best’ impact by 2050 on ageing of the population and the rate of growth of GDP per capita”.
Current ABS projections provide an opportunity to examine what Australia’s demographic composition could look like if net overseas migration was zero, 200,000 (low), 240,000 (middle) or 280,000 (high) per year.
Based on 2011 census data, and medium-range assumptions for fertility and life expectancy, the 2013 (medium range) projections are tracking well with current estimates. These projections provide an indication of the impact of migration, measured as net overseas migration. Net overseas migration reflects the balance of incoming and outgoing movements and includes both permanent and temporary migration.
The four ABS scenarios show varying population numbers over the medium to long term. The higher the net overseas migration level, the bigger the population over the projected years. Interestingly, though, while zero net overseas migration would result in a reduction in population by the year 2070, the population would still continue to grow in the medium term due to natural increase (births minus deaths).
<iframe style="border: none;" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/ukear/2/" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="400"></iframe>
Population composition is an important indicator to consider, rather than size alone. Age distribution is essential to understanding the fiscal opportunities and challenges a population faces.
Comparing the four net overseas migration scenarios illustrates the important contribution migration makes to Australia. The so-called dependency burden – the ratio of the number of children (0-14 years old) and older people (65 years or over) to the working-age population (15-64 years old) – is higher for zero and low net migration levels.
The current rate of net migration provides the middle ground in balancing population age structure and growth.
<iframe style="border: none;" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/1gVxQ/2/" frameborder="0" width="100%" height="500"></iframe>
Population projections
Planners need to know expected population size and growth to ensure adequate services and provisions. The ABS has produced projections for national and sub-national populations since 1950.
Population inquiries throughout Australia’s history have consistently called on such statistics to enable the country’s responsiveness and preparedness to accommodate numbers. Australia hasn’t set any population targets, mainly to avoid coercive population measures (such as mandating birth rates) and to allow flexibility in government policy, particularly around immigration intake.
Estimating population size and growth into the future is about what might be (projection) and not what will be (forecast). So population projections are not predictions; they’re calculations of potential future populations based on assumptions about possible births, deaths and migration.
The “best-before-date” for population projections is considered to be around 5-10 years from the initial base year of calculation. This is why projections should be regularly updated based on best available population data (the census and vital statistics) to ensure assumptions reflect births, deaths and migration trends.
Australia is one part of the global community. Cutting immigration to Australia will impact the demographic composition of the country, with consequences for the working-age population and income tax base.
Any changes to the migration program should be considered alongside evidence. Available evidence shows Australia’s current migration program intake (190,000) is about right for Australia.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/100030/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Australia doesn’t need a moratorium. What we need is a respectful, open and evidence-based population discussion.
Liz Allen, Demographer, ANU Centre for Social Research and Methods, Australian National University
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/migration-helps-balance-our-ageing-population-we-dont-need-a-moratorium-100030" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

Migration helps balance our ageing population – we don't need a moratorium

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
New housing supply is simply not expanding affordable housing opportunities for the poor in a way that reduces the homelessness count. We <a href="https://cloud.3dissue.com/122325/122578/143598/WhyNewSupplyisnotExpandingHousingOptionsfortheHomeless/index" target="_blank">argue that</a> this is due to certain barriers that prevent new supply from filtering down to low-income groups.
Politicians and economists often claim <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/005-2017/" target="_blank">a housing supply crisis</a> is to blame for the lack of affordable housing in Australia. They say increases in housing stock are failing to keep pace with population growth.
In a 2017 address to the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, Treasurer <a href="http://sjm.ministers.treasury.gov.au/speech/005-2017/" target="_blank">Scott Morrison said</a>:
"… for certain Australian households, housing affordability is an issue regardless of where they live due to economic reasons … However, in Sydney and Melbourne where supply has failed to keep pace with rising demand, the problem is far more acute… The principal cause of declining housing affordability is the failure of housing supply to adjust to increased demand…"
Yet housing approval data from the Australian Bureau of Statics show the growth in housing stock has actually outpaced rates of population increase in all Australian capital cities.
<iframe src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/WGWnh/1/" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="400"></iframe>
Between 2005-06 and 2014-15, housing stock has expanded by over 22% while population growth has lagged behind at 19%. Despite this, <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08111146.2017.1374945" target="_blank">median residential property prices nearly doubled</a> in the same period.
How it should work in theory
Increasing housing stock only works to make housing more affordable if certain <a href="http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674543430" target="_blank">filtering processes occur</a>. This is how it looks if the number of new homes increases while the number of households stays fixed or increases at a slower pace.
Those in higher-income households may wish to upgrade to a newer, more expensive house. The established home they vacate would be more appealing to other households if it falls in price. This would then make it affordable to a middle-income household. And the home this middle-income household will vacate would then also fall in value and become affordable for a lower-income household.
Eventually, affordable housing opportunities would trickle down to the homeless, and the homelessness count would decline. But, in Australia, <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/2049.0" target="_blank">homelessness is on the rise</a>. Back in 2006, fewer than 90,000 people were homeless. Within a decade, that number has climbed by nearly one-third, to more than 116,000 people – a 10% increase.
<a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/227549/original/file-20180713-27018-kl93d8.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/227549/original/file-20180713-27018-kl93d8.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt=""></a>
The number of homeless people in NSW has increased more than any other state. 
New South Wales has fared the worst. The number of homeless people in NSW has soared by 70% between 2006 and 2016. With the exception of the Northern Territory, all other states and territories witnessed an increase in homelessness in this period.
So, despite the rise in housing stock, most states and territories have failed to contain, never mind reverse, the rise in homelessness over the last decade. Why are the filtering processes not working?
Barriers to affordability
Deregulation of Australian financial markets and tax concessions have combined to make residential property an attractive investment, especially for higher-income households. So a higher-income earner would gain an additional property rather than swapping one for the other and leaving the vacated one affordable for the next in line.
And if a substantial share of new housing is being purchased as holiday homes or investments, this can stifle the trickle down of affordable housing opportunities.
The recent growth in net overseas migration is a likely barrier as well. Between 2004 and 2015, net <a href="http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3412.02015-16?OpenDocument" target="_blank">overseas migration climbed</a> by 30%, from 138,800 to 181,050. This has outstripped the 22% housing stock growth rate over roughly the same period.
While migration is included in overall population numbers, in this case, the houses migrants are vacating to move to Australia remain in their home country. So this doesn’t contribute to the filtering process.
Transaction costs (mainly high stamp duties) can deter people from trading up, or downsizing. Transaction costs are a <a href="https://www.taxinstitute.com.au/australian-tax-forum/stamp-duties-land-tax-and-housing-affordability-the-case-for-reform" target="_blank">drag on resident movements and suppress housing stock turnover</a>.
Finally, land and building regulations can play a role. Elderly people who may wish to downsize from a family home to an apartment usually <a href="/news">want to live in the same neighbourhood</a>. Yet planning interventions may prevent the construction of units in the suburbs downsizers would prefer.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/95926/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">Until these barriers are lowered, simply increasing new housing supply cannot be the silver bullet that fixes homelessness and the housing affordability concerns of the Australian population.
Rachel Ong, Professor of Economics, School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University 
Gavin Wood, Emeritus Professor of Housing and Housing Studies, RMIT University
This article was originally published on <a href="https://theconversation.com/au" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. 
</body></html>

What is causing Australia's homelessness problem?

<html><body>
One Tree Agriculture has moved to divest a Goondiwindi aggregation spanning more than 9,000 hectares.
Located 50 kilometres west of Goondiwindi, the 9,129 hectare dryland cropping enterprise was only purchased by One Tree Agriculture in 2016.
A portion of the aggregation, ‘Kinbeachie’ (pictured above and below), was purchased from Australian Pastoral Group.
The aggregation, comprising properties, ‘Kinbeachie’, ‘Morville’ and ‘Birribindibil’, is located nearby the township of Toobeah and benefits from frontage to the Barwon Highway and Weir River.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/7/23/Kinbeachie%202.jpg" alt="">
CBRE Agribusiness’ Danny Thomas and Simon Cudmore have the listing.
“The aggregation features characteristics of a highly productive broadacre cropping platform,” Thomas said.
“The scale, operational efficiency, fertile soils and location highlight the aggregation’s suitability for summer and winter cropping.”
Cudmore said the aggregation would be offered in one line or as separate assets depending on market interest.
“There is a genuine opportunity for corporates, families and individuals to secure part or all of the offering as they see fit,” Cudmore said.
“The significant land development of the aggregation over the past couple of years, coupled with a management focus on soil health means the aggregation is positioned on a rising plane of production.”
One Tree Agriculture is owned by private equity fund manager Proterra Investment Partners, which was launched in 2016 as an investment advisory and private equity fund manager.
</body></html>

Rural One Tree Agriculture lists Goondiwindi aggregation

<html><body>
A north facing Palm Beach weekender house with vistas spanning the oceanfront and Pittwater has been sold for $3.4 million.
It was offered by Jonathan Fletcher from McGrath with $3.3 million price guidance.
Held by the one family for 56 years,<a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-nsw-palm+beach-128543134" target="_blank"> 5 Florida Road</a> offered updated interiors, wide decks and a private position.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/7/23/5%20florida%20rd%201.jpg" alt="">
It came with three queen-sized bedrooms with built-ins, gas equipped kitchen, family bathroom and tropical gardens. 
Other features include lime washed floors, ducted air, gas fireplace.
There was single garage plus driveway parking. 
It's just steps from Rock Bath Road pathway to the beachfront.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/7/23/5%20florida%20rd%203.jpg" alt="">
</body></html>

 Palm Beach trophy home with ocean vistas sold for $3.4 million

<html><body>
A Richmond based architect has paid $2.94 million for a leased investment property with development upside at Hawthorn East. 
According to selling agents, Teska Carson’s Michael Taylor and Richard Munday, the 9 Mayston Street property attracted strong enquiry from a broad range of buyers including investors and developers. 
The property attracted small investors and SMSFs with a secure lease to a national tenant, but also offered long term development upside and as such attracted a strong contingent of prospective purchasers.
"The location within one of Melbourne’s most popular and tightly held retail precincts also offered excellent capital growth prospects,’’ Taylor said.
Located near the intersection of Camberwell Road, the property comprises a 470 square metre single level, warehouse/office/showroom premises in good condition with rear roller door access to Gillman Street.
The 562 square metre site has 11 metres street frontage and is zoned Commercial 1 under the City of Boroondara planning scheme and is situated within a tightly held precinct within close proximity of Burke Road, Camberwell shops, Swinburne University and Burwood Road retail.
The property was sold subject to a lease to long standing tenant, Ultra Tune, at a current rental of $90,000 per annum plus outgoings and GST on a five year term with two, five year options and annual 4% increases.
Munday said the purchaser bought the property with the intention to develop in the long term.
The vendor was a local investor.
</body></html>

Architect pays $2.94m for Ultra Tune Hawthorn investment

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
Markets are now broadly pricing in Westpac’s view on the outlook for the RBA cash rate with only around a 50% chance of a rate hike by the end of 2019. That is in stark contrast to a year ago when our call that rates would remain on hold in 2018 and 2019 was well out of market with markets anticipating around 75 basis points of tightening by the end of 2019.
A weakening housing market; soft inflation and wages growth; an uncertain consumer and pressures on funding have all conspired to cool markets’ expectations. That key dynamic around an uncertain consumer facing constraints on income growth with a falling savings rate always stood out as a key constraint on the ability of the household sector to lift spending in the way anticipated by the markets.
While markets have moved largely to embrace our view, the Reserve Bank still expects to be raising rates over the course of 2018 and 2019. I think that is apparent in their ongoing above trend growth forecasts for 2018 and 2019. But, as we have argued before, the Bank does not have a perfect track record with its forecasts (as none of us in the economics community do) and it will react to any differences between its forecasts and “reality” in a timely fashion.
On the other hand our forecasts for the US Federal Funds rate have been consistently above market expectations. Our analysis of the current market pricing is for around 65 basis points of further tightening through 2018 and 2019. We have expected a total of 75 basis points over that period with one 25 bps hike in September, followed by a pause, and then 25 bps hikes in March and June with the rate peaking at 2.625% in mid–2019.
We have expected that signs of the US economy slowing into the second half of 2019 (partly under the weight of a sharp slowdown in government spending) would see the FED curtailing its tightening cycle in anticipation of eventually cutting rates from 2021.
Under that scenario we had been arguing for a weakening AUD/USD which had subsequently peaked around 0.81 in late January this year.
Under our relative rate profile the AUD/USD cash rate differential would sink to an unprecedented –112.5 basis points by June 2019 (previous mark in the post stagflation history was –50 basis points in the late 1990s).
That was likely to take a heavy toll on the AUD/USD with our target being 0.72 by next June.
That sum of 75 basis points of hikes from the FED was still slightly above market expectations but we now believe we need to be even more bold on the FED forecasts. Trends in core inflation; wages; and employment are increasingly casting doubt on a FED pause between September and March.
On a six month annualised basis, the core PCE is now running at 2.3% (to May) and the Employment Cost Index is rising at 2.9% (to March). This pace is somewhat faster than we had expected providing the FED with ample justification for not pausing. In that regard we note that the FED has emphasised the symmetrical nature of its inflation objective and therefore not indicating any immediate concern that the momentum in the core PCE is running above the 2% target. As such, we are still expecting the gradual (3 month intervals) approach to the tightening cycle.
Bill Evans is economic spokesman for Westpac and is head of economic research
</body></html>

The latest outlook from Westpac's interest rate whisperer: Bill Evans

<html><body>
The Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA) have elected two new board directors including CoreLogic's head of content Kylie Davis as its membership base has been growing.
ASPIRE Advisor Network’s Richard Crabb has also been appointed to the PIPA board recently.
Ms Davis (pictured above) is a 25-year media veteran and has nearly 10 years’ experience in property, as national network editor at News Corp Australia and four years in solutions and real estate marketing roles at CoreLogic.
The PIPA chairman Peter Koulizos said PIPA is delighted with Ms Davis’s appointment given her strong media background and expertise in property "both professionally and personally.”
The Sydney-based Davis said she looked forward to working with the rest of the board to raise awareness of professional standards in property investing.
“I’ve been a property investor for the past 10 years and know how fraught the experience of getting quality advice can be and how very important good research is,” she said.
“With APRA changes making it more difficult to fund property investment and affordability issues, there has never been a more important time for professional standards to be raised and increased transparency in the industry.”
Victoria’s Richard Crabb of the ASPIRE Advisor Network was also elected to the PIPA board of directors.
Crabb brings a wealth of knowledge to the board table given his 20-plus years in senior financial services and leadership roles.
“As well as being a successful property investor himself, the ASPIRE Advisor Network has transacted about $250 million in investment properties across Australia,” he said.
Mr Crabb said he was looking forward to representing the ethical practitioners working within the brand-new property investment space.
“This is a segment of the market that unfortunately, with no regulation, has seen many operators, marketers, spruikers and self-proclaimed property investment advisers ‘sell’ properties by any means to investors,” Mr Crabb said.
PIPA was formed by industry practitioners with the objective of representing and raising the professional standards of all operators involved in property investment
</body></html>

CoreLogic's Kylie Davis appointed to PIPA board

<html><body>
A Coopers Shoot house with views over the hinterland, coastline, Julian Rocks and Cape Byron Lighthouse has been listed for sale.
It is offered by Su Reynolds from First National Byron Bay.
The home was last sold in 2013 for $1,300,000.
<a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-coopers+shoot-128778894" target="_blank">Located at 54 Coopers Shoot Rd</a>, the large open plan living wing of the home comes with solid American Oak wide floorboards and a bespoke stone wall with fireplace.These spacious living dining and kitchen zones open through wide doors to multiple covered outdoor living spaces overlooking the pool and gardens.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/7/9/coopers%20shoot%202.jpg" alt="">
The first floor and bedroom wing of the home feature uninterrupted views over Byron Bay, the lighthouse and along the coastline for miles.
Other features include kitchen with Carrara marble benches, separate media room, large office, pool cabana and lush landscaped gardens. 
Positioned on a north facing 2719sqm block, it is just a few minutes' drive to both Byron Bay and Bangalow.
Coopers Shoot is a suburb in the Byron Shire of the Northern Rivers region in New South Wales.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/7/9/coopers%20shoot%203.jpg" alt="">
 
</body></html>

Coopers Shoot home listed for sale

Buyers considering a residence at boutique Gordon townhouse development <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/lume-gordon-43-47-dumaresq-street-gordon-nsw-2072">Lume</a>&nbsp;now have another reason to bring forward their decision.

For a limited time, purchasers of a residence at Lume will receive a BMW iX3 50 electric SUV, valued at more than $120,000, as part of their purchase. The offer is designed to add value for buyers while complementing the lifestyle envisioned for the architecturally designed Upper North Shore development.

Scott Timmins, Development Manager at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/winim">WINIM</a>, said the partnership was created to provide buyers with a compelling reason to act.

"In today's market, buyers need a compelling reason to act now, and the BMW partnership was designed to create that catalyst. We wanted to add genuine value for our future purchasers. Choosing the all-electric BMW iX3 50 also reflects the values behind LUME, forward-thinking design, innovation and a more sustainable way of living. It's a premium incentive that complements the lifestyle our buyers aspire to and rewards those who commit early."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374893]

Delivered by WINIM in partnership with Burtonwood Investment Partners, Lume comprises 14 architecturally designed two, three and four-bedroom townhomes created for families seeking the space of a freestanding house with the ease of modern, low-maintenance living.

The three-storey residences, designed by award-winning architecture practice <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/rothelowman">Rothelowman</a>, have been tailored for families and multi-generational living, featuring private internal lifts, flexible lower-level spaces, generous open-plan living and entertaining areas, media rooms, and landscaped outdoor spaces with custom outdoor kitchens.&nbsp;

Inside, engineered oak flooring, bespoke dining joinery with integrated wine fridges and backlit bars, sculptural porcelain bathrooms, Parisi freestanding baths and Astra Walker tapware create interiors that balance functionality with refined finishes.

Each townhome has been designed to combine generous internal spaces with sustainability initiatives such as EV charging infrastructure, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/landscape-architect/arcadia-landscape-architecture">Arcadia</a>'s landscaped communal areas, centred around a restored creek line and native planting, encourage residents to connect with nature and spend more time outdoors.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=269527]

Rothelowman's Gary Tsui said the architecture was conceived to respond carefully to its Upper North Shore setting.

"Our vision was to create elegant, uplifting homes that draw on and positively contribute to the local character through meticulously considered design and an interaction with the surroundings."

The communal landscape has been designed as more than an open space between homes. Arcadia's Ben Newell and Kate Phillips said the adjoining reserve provided an opportunity to create a distinctive natural retreat for residents.

"Just as waterways carve their way through Ku-ring-gai's landscape, a raised boardwalk weaves through the reserve, connecting the homes to this tranquil oasis."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7354 project_image_fid=374892]

Located just 300 metres from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/gordon-nsw-2072">Gordon</a> Village and Gordon railway station, Lume offers convenient access to Sydney's CBD while placing residents close to some of the North Shore's leading schools, including Ravenswood, Pymble Ladies' College and Knox Grammar. Lane Cove National Park, Gordon Golf Club and a range of cafés and restaurants further reinforce the family-focused lifestyle on offer, with the BMW iX3 50 complementing everything from local trips around Gordon to weekend drives and city commutes.

Construction is underway with completion expected in mid-2027.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=7354]

Joel Robinson

Boutique Gordon townhomes now come with a BMW iX3 50

Two apartments have sold for more than $10 million at EADE Byron Bay, setting some of the highest apartment prices ever achieved in the coastal town and underlining the growing appetite for luxury beachfront apartments in Australia's most popular coastal locations.

The $210 million project by Vitale Property Group has now secured more than $70 million in sales, led by residences that changed hands for $12.75 million and $11.75 million.

The record-breaking transactions reinforce the shift occurring in Byron Bay's premium property market, where affluent downsizers and lifestyle buyers are increasingly opting for high-end apartments over large beachfront homes.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/eade-byron-bay-29-shirley-street-byron-bay-nsw-2481">EADE Byron Bay</a> occupies a rare 6,000 sqm absolute beachfront site on the corner of Shirley and Milton Streets overlooking Main Beach and The Wreck surf break, just 350 metres from Byron Bay's town centre.

The 25-residence development is the first beachfront apartment project approved in Byron Bay in more than a decade and is currently under construction, with completion expected in May 2027.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359521]

The project has attracted a mix of local Byron Shire residents downsizing from larger homes, alongside interstate buyers from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane seeking a permanent coastal lifestyle without compromising on space.

Designed by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/hayball">Hayball</a> and with interiors by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/alexander-co">Alexander &amp; Co</a>, EADE comprises&nbsp;10 garden apartments ranging from 284 sqm to 622 sqm, nine with private pools, five full-floor apartments and 10 rooftop residences with private plunge pools, expansive outdoor entertaining areas and uninterrupted ocean views.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359527]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/vitale-property-group">Vitale Property Group</a> Managing Partner Chris Vitale said the project's combination of scale, location and limited future supply was driving buyer demand.

"There isn't another beachfront holding in Byron Bay of this size and position that could be developed again," Vitale said.

"Buyers are responding to the scarcity and the irreplaceability of a site of this calibre and to floorplans they can't find elsewhere in the market.

"We are seeing buyers place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of the location. The sales achieved to date demonstrate that discerning purchasers recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay.

"Many are coming from larger homes in the Byron region, or from Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane, and are after the space, security and convenience, without the upkeep of a house."

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=145590 project_image_fid=359523]

The Byron Bay project follows Vitale Property Group's delivery of the Mondrian Hotel and Private Residences at Burleigh Heads, with EADE continuing the developer's focus on luxury coastal developments.

Residents will have access to a resort-style swimming pool, gymnasium, sauna, cold plunge pool, concierge services and dedicated workspaces, while the project is targeting an 8-Star Green Star rating.

EADE Byron Bay is being exclusively marketed by Projx Australia in conjunction with WHITEFOX Projects.

WHITEFOX National Projects Director Phillip Rand said demand had been driven predominantly by owner-occupiers.

"We are seeing buyers at EADE place significant value on quality, space, design, resort-style amenities and the rarity of this location," Rand says.

"The sales achieved to date demonstrate that purchasers at this level recognise the long-term significance of what is being created at EADE Byron Bay."

Residences at EADE Byron Bay are currently priced between $4.75 million and $15.95 million.

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=145590]

Vitale breaks Byron Bay records with EADE sales flurry 

When buying an apartment, most people compare the big-ticket items first. Floorplans. Kitchens. Balcony size. Natural light. The view.

But there's one everyday consideration that often doesn't come up until after moving in: how parcels are delivered.

As online shopping has become part of everyday life, parcel deliveries have shifted from an occasional event to a regular occurrence. Australians spent a record $82.6 billion shopping online in 2025, with almost one in every four retail dollars now spent digitally.

For apartment residents, that can present a challenge.

If nobody is home to accept a delivery, parcels may be redirected to a nearby Post Office, left in a building lobby or common area, or require building management to step in. In higher-density buildings, where dozens or even hundreds of residents may receive deliveries each day, parcel management has become an increasingly important part of everyday living.

That can create a range of frustrations. A missed delivery often means making time to collect a parcel elsewhere, while packages left unattended in foyers or mail areas can create clutter and increase the risk of theft. What seems like a minor inconvenience can quickly become a recurring issue for residents who shop online regularly.

It's one of those details that rarely features in a display suite but can have a noticeable impact once residents move in.

As a result, buyers are beginning to look beyond traditional apartment features and consider how a building supports day-to-day convenience, including whether there are secure options for receiving deliveries.

Australia Post's Parcel Lockers provide one solution.

<iframe allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/CkF2oKmlACg?si=C50sDaoUUn2nuLmq" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>

Rather than having a parcel delivered directly to an apartment, eligible deliveries can be sent to a nominated Parcel Locker. Once the parcel arrives, residents receive a notification through the AusPost app or SMS and can collect it using a QR code or one-time PIN at a time that suits them.

The Parcel Locker network now includes more than 1,500 locations nationwide, with installations at Post Offices, shopping centres, transport hubs and an increasing number of residential developments. By providing a secure collection point, Parcel Lockers help reduce missed deliveries and avoid parcels being left unattended in common areas.

For developers, parcel infrastructure is becoming another way to improve the resident experience. Rather than relying on concierge staff or leaving parcels in communal spaces, secure collection points help streamline deliveries while preserving the presentation and functionality of shared areas.

For buyers, it's a reminder that the best apartment features aren't always the most obvious.

A generous floorplan or quality finishes might help narrow the shortlist, but the conveniences that simplify everyday life, whether that's EV charging, secure bike storage or reliable parcel delivery, often become the features residents appreciate most once they're living there.

The apartment feature many buyers don't think about, until their first missed delivery

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/hg-developments">HG Developments</a> is doubling down on Maud Street in Newstead, filing plans for a new apartment tower just a few doors down from its under-construction Aire Newstead development.

Recently submitted to Brisbane City Council, the proposal is for an 18-storey building designed by bureau^proberts, which has drawn heavily on Brisbane's subtropical design principles while referencing the suburb's industrial heritage.

A total of 64 apartments are planned for the amalgamated 1,518 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/17-21-maud-street-newstead-qld-4006">17–21 Maud Street</a>, a short walk from the Brisbane River and Newstead Riverwalk.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="a400c7fd-bd15-48f8-a63b-10ede92efe00" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20bldg.png?VersionId=.0vPmjpbC7CNP7kqGWa6L7rGIwsNExaw" />

"The building is defined by a series of vaulted motifs that reinterpret the arches, colonnades and layered facades evident throughout Newstead's historic built fabric," the Urban Design Report states.

"Combined with recessed glazing and generous balconies, these elements create a layered building envelope that provides shade, weather protection and opportunities for natural ventilation whilst establishing a distinctive architectural identity."

The proposal comprises 64 two, three and four-bedroom apartments across 18 residential levels, positioning it alongside a growing number of taller residential projects transforming Newstead's northern precinct. The tower incorporates extensive subtropical landscaping, with cascading planter boxes, deep planting at street level and a landscaped rooftop recreation area.

<img alt="First look: HG Developments plans 18-storey subtropical apartment tower for Newstead" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="1d8140f4-8b98-45cd-b1b8-1efe8c8e266b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Maud%20st%20podium.png?VersionId=VAZtbCoD44YCJ57N99fQCAKeSJx7ldZs" />

Bureau Proberts has prioritised passive environmental design throughout the project, with generous balconies, recessed glazing and operable façades helping reduce solar heat gain while maximising natural ventilation. River views become available from the upper levels, while the building has been orientated to capture prevailing breezes from both the Brisbane River and the west.

The architects say landscape is intended to be integral to the building rather than an applied element.

"Vertical greenery, cascading planter boxes and elevated gardens are woven throughout the architecture, softening the built form and strengthening the connection between residents and the subtropical environment."

"Through the integration of landscape, high-quality materials and passive design principles, the development delivers a refined residential address that celebrates Newstead's heritage character while contributing positively to Brisbane's evolving subtropical identity."

Newstead has remained one of Brisbane's most active apartment markets in recent years, with a number of developers continuing to back the inner-city suburb.

HG Developments is currently delivering the 40-apartment Aire Newstead at 25 Maud Street. Fortis recently launched the 65-apartment <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/crest-walker-newstead-12-kyabra-street-newstead-qld-4006">Crest &amp; Walker</a> on Kyabra Street, while builder-developer BPG and Don O'Rorke's Consolidated Properties are both expected to launch their respective Newstead projects before the end of the year.

HG Developments doubles down in Newstead with second Maud Street apartment development

Walk past a new apartment development promoting its sustainability credentials and it's easy to picture rooftop gardens, mature trees, landscaped courtyards and residents surrounded by nature.

But in many cases, that's not actually what those sustainability ratings guarantee.

Australia's leading environmental rating tools have played a significant role in improving the energy efficiency and environmental performance of buildings. Yet despite their focus on reducing emissions, many don't require developers to include trees, biodiversity or meaningful green space.

In other words, a building can achieve one of the country's highest sustainability ratings while containing little more than concrete, glass and hard landscaping.

That disconnect has led to the emergence of a new movement across Australia's property industry: nature-based cities.

The concept goes beyond designing buildings that consume less energy. Instead, it encourages developers to treat nature as essential infrastructure, integrating biodiversity, tree canopy, living landscapes and green spaces into projects from the earliest stages of planning.

Research has consistently linked access to nature with better physical and mental health, cooler neighbourhoods, improved biodiversity, stronger climate resilience and more connected communities. As Australia's cities continue to become denser, advocates say those outcomes should be considered just as important as energy efficiency.

Nature Based Cities (NBC) was established in 2022 to help accelerate that shift.

Founded by Hamton Executive Chairman Paul Hameister OAM, the not-for-profit was created after research highlighted a significant gap in Australia's sustainability framework. While existing environmental rating tools rewarded energy performance and emissions reductions, they placed little emphasis on the inclusion of living landscapes.

"We've always wanted to do more, and we know other developers who want to do more, but the ESD rating tools just aren't there," Hameister says.

"In Australia, you can have a five-green-star rated building that's concrete and glass with not a blade of grass.

"The focus is on reducing emissions, which is laudable, but there hasn't been enough attention paid to protecting and re-establishing nature. We need both for the health of the environment and for communities."

Since its launch, NBC has developed independent design guidelines and accreditation frameworks that encourage developers to prioritise ecology, biodiversity, tree canopy, walkability and living landscapes alongside traditional sustainability measures. The organisation first focused on medium and high-density residential developments before recently expanding into precinct-scale communities and masterplanned neighbourhoods.

Jan Talacko, founder of sustainability consultancy Ark Resources and a member of the Nature Based Cities Advisory Council, says the initiative addresses an area that has largely been overlooked by the property industry.

"Throughout my 25 years of working collaboratively with all stakeholders in the property sector, I've always favoured a pragmatic approach to sustainable design which encourages initiatives that not only meet environmental expectations but also improve amenity," Talacko says.

"Whilst we are making steady progress in relation to energy and carbon emissions from buildings, there has been much less emphasis on encouraging biodiversity and tackling the urban heat island effect.

"The Nature Based Cities initiative responds to a gap in the suite of tools currently used by the property development sector, which don't provide sufficient incentive, or recognition, for the integration of landscaping and greenery."

For apartment buyers, the shift is also changing the questions worth asking.

Rather than assuming a sustainable building will naturally include abundant green space, buyers are increasingly being encouraged to look beyond environmental ratings and ask what nature is actually being delivered. How much tree canopy will the development create? Has biodiversity been considered? Are landscaped spaces designed for people as well as appearance?

As Australia's cities continue to grow upwards and outwards, the next generation of sustainability may not simply be measured by lower emissions, but by how successfully developments bring nature back into everyday urban life.

Staff reporter

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News