<html><body>
The proposed changes to super rules announced by the federal government last week will hit the back pockets of ordinary pensioners with small super balances not just those with property-laden self-managed super funds.
Federal treasurer Wayne Swan <a target="_blank" href="/news">announced that from July 1 2014</a>, earnings above $100,000 will be taxed at the same concessional rate of 15% that applies to earnings in the accumulation phase.
Swan said this would impact on just 16,000 account holders and result in a fairer superannuation system.
However, the announcement also included the extension of normal deeming rules to superannuation account-based income streams for the purposes of the age pension income test.
“Under the change announced today, standard pension deeming arrangements will apply to new superannuation account-based income streams assessed under the pension income test rules after 1 January 2015,” said Swan.
“All products held by pensioners before 1 January 2015 will be grandfathered indefinitely and continue to be assessed under the existing rules for the life of the product so no current pensioner will be affected, unless they choose to change products.
According to financial planner Phil Clinton the changes to deeming rules will mean that a single person with a modest pension of $150,000 will receive $26 less per week.
Speaking to <a target="_blank" href="https://www.2gb.com/article/pensioners-be-hit-hard-new-superannuation-rules">Ross Greenwood on 2GB</a>, Clinton, from Halcyon Wealth Advisers, explained that in the past if you had your money in an allocated pension – the next phase after accumulating it in a super fund – you would not be deemed to have earned anything from that fund and could claim a full pension.
“That was the benefit of having your money in that pension fund,” he said.
But under the proposed extension of deeming rules, from January 1 2015 the first $45,400 will be deemed to earn income at 2.5% and anything above that at a rate of 4%.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Clinton provided the example of someone with a modest super fund worth a $150,000, who owns their own home (which is exempt from the asset test) and have bank accounts plus some home contents, which add up to less than $192,500 – the assets limit for a single homeowner before the age pension reduces.
“[Under the proposed changes] they are deemed to get 2.5% on the first $45,400, which equals $1,135 and the remaining $104,600 is deemed at 4%, which equals $4,185.
“So a pension would be deemed to earn a total of $5,319 that that they previously would not have earned.
“Currently they receive a full pension if their income does not exceed $152 a fortnight.
“Under this rule they will be deemed to have earned $204.57 per fortnight
“The pension reduces by 50 cents for every dollar over the $152 limit, so they will lose $26.28 per fortnight in pension,” said Clinton.
Clinton acknowledged the federal government's statement that products held by pensioners before January 1 2015 would be grandfathered indefinitely but said the key words were “for the life of the product”.
That he said was “the kicker”.
“What happens if you change from one allocated pension to another, you are now in a separate product?
“We don’t know for sure but they may remove the grandfathering in that case.”
As of March this year, a single person eligible for the full age pension can now expect an annual income of around $21,020.
A couple is eligible for around $31,700.
 
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Pensioners not just property-laden SMSFs to be hit by super changes: financial planner

<html><body>
First-home buyers will not reap any benefits from record low interest rates if developers don’t bring new stock to market, according to Yellow Brick Road’s Mark Bouris.
Bouris told David Koch on Sunrise that he hoped that in the current circumstances property developers would supply more new property to the market.
“If they do more developments there is more choice for people,” says Bouris.
“But if that does not happen, all that will happen is the prices will rise and the saving that new buyers would ordinarily get from an interest rate cut will be cancelled out because prices will adjust for it,” he says.
Overall, he expects little impact on the economy from the rate cut, commenting that since the GFC people “don’t actually go and spend the extra money they have in their pocket” so “we are not getting the stimulus in the economy we would ordinarily get”.
According to Bouris, the rate cut could spark a price boom, but not necessarily a transaction boom.
His advice to borrowers is to ask their banks what is the biggest discount they can offer them against their advertised rate.
“The rule thumb should be at least a 50 basis point discount with some lenders offering up to a full 100 basis point discount.
“But if you don’t ask you won’t get it.”
For those considering a fixed-rate home loan, he suggests they wait until the big banks bring out their next fixed-rate offerings – not to take up what they currently offer.
</body></html>

House prices will rise unless developers bring new stock to the market: Mark Bouris

<html><body>
The peak body for professionals that provide advice on the fast expanding self-managed super fund sector (SMSF) is urging that real estate agents who recommend these investments and mortgage brokers who arrange financing for them be required to hold a licence.
It follows a growing number of cases and complaints against so-called “spruikers” targeted at unwary investors through free introductory lunches as well as ASIC clamping down on unscrupulous operators that don’t disclose the risks of such investments.
SMSF Professionals' Association of Australia (SPAA) chief executive Andrea Slattery, has told the Australian Financial Review it wants Treasury to licence mortgage brokers and real estate agents that provide advice in this area.
SPAA offers its own SMSF adviser and SMSF auditor accreditations.
Mortgage brokers and real estate agents are not a big chunk of the SPAA membership, which counts accountants, auditors, financial planners, lawyers, risk providers, actuaries, administrators and educators among its members.
She says there has been talk of greater regulation of those who provide SMSF advice, but little action to date.
In February ASIC said it was considering increasing its powers to include oversight of property investments schemes recommended to self-managed super funds, but nothing formal has been proposed to date.
In April, it released a report on the quality of advice in the sector and ways to improve it.
ASIC found that while most advice provided was rated as adequate there were pockets of poor advice.
ASIC found issues in the following areas: 
<ul>
<li>advice was not sufficiently tailored to the needs of the investor</li>
<li>replacement product disclosure was absent or inadequate</li>
<li>insurance recommendations were absent or inadequate</li>
<li>an inappropriate single asset class was provided to investors</li>
<li>suitable alternatives to an SMSF were not considered, and</li>
<li>there was inadequate consideration of the investor’s long-term retirement planning objectives.</li>
</ul>
APRA superannuation figures to the end of March show that SMSF assets increased from $473.9 billion to $496.2 billion for a $22.3 billion or 4.7% gain over the quarter with sector accounting for almost a third (31.5%) of the total $1.58 trillion superannuation pool.
According to SPAA research, more than three quarters of SMSF trustees buy assets such as property and shares directly rather than through a managed fund.
In May, ASIC cancelled the credit licence of Money Choice and banned its director, Matthew George, after an investigation found failures to comply with credit laws, responsible lending shortfalls and instances of unlicensed self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) advice.
In April, it was revealed that <a target="_blank" href="/news">four Melbourne businesses running seminars on investing in real estate through SMSF</a>s are being investigated by ASIC over the potentially misleading nature of flyers, advertisements and online ads promoting these seminars.
</body></html>

Real estate agents and mortgage brokers must have SMSF licence: SPAA

<html><body>
The Australian Tax Office (ATO) is warning trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) to be cautious when investing in property.
Its warned arrangements that are “deliberately entered into to get around the law” can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties and even criminal charges.
The ATO has also joined ASIC by warning of those individuals and companies promoting property investments to SMSF trustees.
<a target="_blank" href="/news">Last week ASIC</a> revealed to The Australian that it is undertaking “limited surveillance” of financial advisers and accountants over concerns that property spruikers are encouraging investors to set up self-managed super funds purely as vehicles for "dodgy" property investments.
Acting tax commissioner Bruce Quigley says he is concerned people are using their SMSF to invest in property without fully understanding their obligations under the law or some people are seeking to take advantage of certain types of arrangements.
 "We have observed that some arrangements are deliberately entered into to get around the law, which can result in the fund's trustees being disqualified, facing civil penalties or even facing criminal charges.
“Those marketing properties to SMSF trustees as part of such arrangements could be referred to ASIC,” he says.
Quigley says investing in property can be a confusing area for some people.
"The fine details are important and trustees need to be sure that property is the right investment for their SMSF and that the arrangement is legal,"
"We have also seen instances where holding trusts have not even been established at the time the contracts to acquire are signed.
“In other instances the title of the property is held in the individual's name rather than the trustee of the holding trust. Another common mistake is gearing in a related unit trust, which is not allowed under the law," he says.
"Some of these arrangements, if structured incorrectly, cannot simply be restructured or rectified. The only option may be to unwind the arrangement which could involve forced sale of assets at an inconvenient time. This could be very expensive for the fund with potential stamp duty and tax consequences."
"I urge trustees to get reliable, independent advice when making investment decisions and to obtain advice from us if they are contemplating entering into these sorts of arrangements. The responsibility for ensuring their SMSF complies with the law rests with them," says Quigley.
</body></html>

Australian Tax Office joins ASIC by warning SMSF trustees on illegal property investment arrangements

<html><body>
Housing affordability improved for the seventh straight quarter in September to be at its highest level in three years, according to the latest HIA-CBA Housing Affordability Index.
Over the quarter, the index increased by 5.3% to 65.8% to be up by 15% compared with the same quarter in 2011.
Affordability improved due to the median dwelling price falling from $466,900 to $459,100, and mortgage rates falling from 6.4% to 6% over the quarter.
Affordability improved in all capital city and regional markets with Hobart the most affordable with an index score of 78.3 - up from 73.1, followed by the ACT (67.8 to 71.3) and Adelaide (70 to 71.1).
Sydney’s affordability score improved from 51.9 to 54.2 over the quarter, but remains the least affordable capital city market, followed by Melbourne (63.6), Perth (64.1) and Brisbane (68.5).
In Victoria, South Australia and Queensland, it is more affordable to buy in the capital city market than in the regions.
HIA chief economist Harley Dale says the run of consecutive improvements in some regional indices is even longer, “in some instances showing affordability has reached levels not seen since the early 2000s”.
“Housing affordability has been improving on the back of steadily growing incomes, falling interest rates, and easing dwelling prices,” says Dale.
“At the same time, however, transactions volumes have remained historically low as economic uncertainty has weighed heavily on households’ willingness to engage in the residential property market.”
“Tentative signs of a recovery in transactions volumes should hopefully gather legs – another interest rate cut in early December would enhance the prospects of this occurring.
“An increase in home buyer action can occur without generating undue inflationary pressure and would assist a much-needed recovery in new residential construction activity.”
A full explanation of how the index is calculated can be <a href="https://economics.hia.com.au/media/Affordability%20Index%20Methodology.pdf">downloaded on the HIA website.</a>
</body></html>

Housing affordability improves to highest level since September 2009: HIA/CBA index

<html><body>
DIY super investors should consider acquiring an NRAS property because of the positive cashflow benefits, according to a new report by property investment and financial advisory firm Onyx Wealth.
Investing in a property that qualifies for the government’s national rental affordability scheme (NRAS) is a way for SMSF trustees to avoid being in the position, where they hold a property that is both negatively geared and provides negative cashflow, according to report authors Paul Thewlis and Margaret Hardy.
Such a holding would require the SMSF to have large enough liquid assets and/or cash inflows to allow for these losses.
In an interview with <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/queensland/nras-and-smsf-investors-helping-keep-inner-brisbane-off-the-plan-market-afloat-david-devine/2012112858155">Property Observer last week,</a> Brisbane apartment developer David Devine said SMSF and NRAS investors were among the biggest buyers of off-the-plan projects developed by his Metro Property Development company, which has the two top selling projects in inner Brisbane.
Metro has marketed more than 50% of the 308 apartments in its Madison Heights development as NRAS-approved investments, compared with 20% in its first development, the Chelsea, now completed.
But yesterday, <a target="_blank" href="/news">property investment advisor Margaret Lomas</a> warned investors against investing in NRAS properties, labelling it a tax scheme intended for institutional investors and said investors considering the scheme should seek a private tax ruling "before taking the plunge on any scheme that sounds so good".
SMSFs can purchase an NRAS approved property, which provides an annual tax free incentive estimated at $119,833 over the next 10 years.
In return, the property must be rented out to eligible tenants at a rent at least 20% below market rent as assessed by an independent valuer, with eligible tenants determined by government income thresholds.
“NRAS properties have greater negative gearing than equivalent non-NRAS properties,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
“By giving up 20% of the taxable rental income the SMSF increases its tax loss. Normally a loss is undesirable, but in this case it is usually offset by the value of the NRAS incentive.
“Take for example an NRAS property which has a market rental value of $300 per week. A 20% discount on that rent means the SMSF is giving up $60 per week of taxable income.
“At the same time, the SMSF gains $190 per week of untaxed income in the form of the NRAS incentive."
Due to superannuation act rules SMSFs can only purchase completed or off-the-plan property
The majority of NRAS properties purchased by Onyx Wealth clients are priced between $250,000 and $400,000.
Because they are new properties, they also have the tax benefit of having greater depreciation allowances than older property.
Another benefit is stamp duty savings in some states.
“SMSFs buying property off the plan can benefit from substantial stamp duty savings. For example, in Victoria and Western Australia, purchasers who buy apartments off the plan prior to construction only pay stamp duty on the land value apportioned to each individual apartment,” explain Thewlis and Hardy.
<a target="_blank" href="https://onyx.net.au/">Onyx Wealth</a> provides the following example to show income generated for a SMSF with no property investment, an SMSF with a normal property investment and an SMSF with an NRAS property investment:
Click to enlarge
<a rel="shadowbox" href="/images/stories/2012/12/onyx.gif" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2012/12/onyxthumb.gif"></a>
 
</body></html>

NRAS property investment can provide positive cashflow for SMSF investors: Onyx

<html><body>
The federal government appears happy to allow the state governments of NSW and Queensland to break their commitment to offer “universal” first-home owner grants following the two states' decisions earlier this year to only incentivise new home purchases.
Since September 12 in Queensland and October 1 in NSW, first-home owners qualify for a $15,000 state government handout if they buy or build a new home.
First-home buyers who purchase an existing home receive nothing.
These decisions, aimed at stimulating the residential construction sector, are in clear contravention of state government commitments to provide a “universal” first home owner schemes (FHOS) to all buyers".
This looks set to change with the <a href="https://www.gstdistributionreview.gov.au/content/Content.aspx?doc=reports/finaloctober2012/00executivesummary.htm#P130_11433" target="_blank">GST Distribution Review Final Report </a>released at the end of November recommending that the states be relieved of their obligation to offer a universal FHOS grant.
“It should become a matter for States’ own policy decisions as to what financial assistance should be offered for new home buyers,” says recommendation 11.4.
It is now up to federal treasurer Wayne Swan to make consult with the states before making his final decision.
However, the states have not had any kind of reprimand, despite offering an incentive that has been called nothing more than a “builders incentive” and flying in the face of logic, given that a higher proportion of first-home buyers wish to buy an existing home than a new home.
This iss borne out in the latest Mortgage Choice consumer survey, which found that more than 47% of first-home buyers looking to purchase in the next two years are looking to buy an existing property with less than a quarter (22%) considering building or buying a new – the remainder are undecided.
In response to a number of questions from Property Observer a spokesperson for the Federal Treasurer’s office said that “regrettably” there was not much that could be said.
Property Observer had asked what is the Treasury’s position was on NSW and Queensland breaching their obligations by adopting these new grant arrangements and whether the Treasury accepted the view that these have become “builders grants” not a first-home buyers grant?
Instead, Property Observer was directed to the following paragraph in the media release issued following the release of the GST Distribution Review Final Report.
“I look forward to discussing the Panel's recommendations with State and Territory Treasurers at the Standing Council on Federal Financial Relations meeting on 17 December 2012, prior to announcing the Commonwealth's position once the Government has given thorough consideration to the complex issues addressed by the Report,” said Wayne Swan.
Speaking to Property Observer in November, Ray White chairman Brian White said the new grants were distorting the market “and not in a healthy way".
“It’s no longer a first-home buyer’s grant but a builder’s incentive,” said White who labelled it deceitful to describe it as a first-home buyer’s grant.
His comments follows the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/reia-says-all-first-home-buyers-should-get-the-fhbg-not-just-those-buying-new-homes/2012102557430">Real Estate Institute of Australia (REIA) voicing concern</a> at the decisions by the NSW and Queensland governments as well as plans by South Australian government to end its $7,000 universal first-home owner grant in June 2014.
"Not only is this in breach of the InterGovernmental Agreement (IGA) but it ignores the evidence that 70% of first-home buyers have a clear preference for established houses,” said REIA president Pamela Bennett.
“The IGA clearly states that assistance to first-home buyers will be uniform and that an eligible home will be new or established.
Bennett also claimed that first home buyers of established homes “often embark on a program of home-improvement and renovation, which helps stimulate the building sector”.
WA, Victoria, Tasmania, the ACT and the Northern Territory continue to offer a universal $7,000 first-home owner grant.
</body></html>

Wayne Swan set to assist NSW and Queensland push towards 'builders' first-home owner grants

<html><body>
If Harry Triguboff were governor of the Reserve Bank, the cash rate would fall to 2.25%, a setting that the Meriton boss believes would encourage first-home buyers back into the market in a meaningful way.
In another yarn with Business Spectator’s Robert Gottliebsen, Triguboff said first-home buyers were not as responsive to interest rate cuts as they were in the past primarily because it is still cheaper to rent in places like the outer suburbs of Sydney than buy.
He believes a quarter percentage point shaved from the cash rate, as the RBA is anticipated to announce tomorrow at its December monetary policy meeting, or even a 50 basis point cut, would have little impact on the decisions of first-home buyers.
First-home buyers will only buy a property when they know it will leave them better off financially every month – when mortgage repayments are lower than rental payments.
Triguboff calls this an unprecedented attitude and one which is being felt by all developers and builders especially across the eastern seaboard and one which they did not expect.
Around a third of Melbourne residential land has been returned by building companies over the September, according to the latest report by the <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/land/one-in-three-melbourne-residential-lots-being-returned-to-developers-by-building-firms-report/2012112958179?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=newsplus">National Land Survey Program</a> report carried jointly by Research Four and property consultants Charter Keck Cramer
Last week, <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/queensland/mirvac-refunding-all-off-the-plan-deposits-for-postponed-brisbane-and-townsville-residential-projects/2012112858163">Mirvac cancelled projects</a> and refunded deposits on projects in Brisbane and Townsville after very low off-the-plan sales.
</body></html>

Rates need to fall a further 100 basis points to bring back first-home buyers: Harry Triguboff

<html><body>
Self-managed super funds (SMSF) have increased their weighting to low-risk cash and term deposits as well as listed shares, but commercial property remains a substantial part of their portfolios.
The latest report on the sector from the Australian Tax Office (ATO) for the 2010-11 tax year shows declines in residential, non-residential property and listed property trusts investments as a proportion of assets held in SMSF portfolios.
SMSFs directly invested 78% of their assets, mainly in cash and term deposits and Australian-listed shares (a total of over 60%). While smaller SMSFs tended to favour cash and term deposits, larger SMSFs had a greater tendency to invest in listed shares, notes the ATO in its report.
“This is the first time over the three years (going back to 2008-09)  in which holdings of these two asset types (cash and term deposits and shares) have shifted in the same direction,” says the ATO.
“In turn there were small shifts away from all the other assets represented with a sustained shift away from listed trusts occurring over the three years.
“The data confirms the SMSF sector responds to changing economic circumstances.”
 
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/2012/12/absdec20.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2012/12/absdec20thumb.gif"></a>
Despite the general shift away from property, bricks and mortar remains a substantial part of SMSF investment strategy, with commercial property representing 11% of portfolios and residential property making up 3.5%.
In dollar terms, SMSFs have invested $48 billion in commercial property, $14.7 billion in residential property, $17.8 billion in listed trusts and $37.2 billion in unlisted trusts.
Listed shares account for nearly a third of SMSF assets (32%), followed by cash and term deposits (29%).
Listed trusts make up 4% of portfolios, and unlisted property trusts 8.8%. Many of these are property-related.
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/2012/12/absdec201.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2012/12/absdec201thumb.gif"></a>
The latest report shows that growth in SMSFs numbers continues.
Between the years ended June 2008 to June 2012 SMSF numbers have grown from almost 376,000 to over 478,000, representing growth of over 27%.
There are 913,550 members in the SMSF sector, almost 8% of roughly 11.6 million members in Australian super funds.
Collectively they hold $439 billion in assets.
Over this four-year period, the average assets of SMSFs grew by 12% to $963,000.
</body></html>

SMSFs turn to low-risk deposits and shares but commercial property still big part of portfolios: ATO report

<html><body>
Economist Steve Keen has delivered a damning verdict on the impact of first-home owner grants, saying they only serve to drive up property prices and push first-home owners out of the property market. 


The embattled economics professor and columnist, currently in a legal dispute with his academic institution the University of Western Sydney, says the new doubled $15,000 first-home owner grants being offered by the NSW and Queensland state governments – labelled builders’ grant by Ray White boss Brian White – aren’t as damaging as the previous broader grant to buyers of existing properties.

Keen labelled the recent accusation levelled by acting NSW opposition leader Linda Burney that Premier Barry O’Farrell had abandoned first-home buyers by cutting the grant for existing home and removing stamp duty concessions (unless you buy or build a new home) as “bollocks”.

“First-home buyers weren’t locked out by the ending of the first home vendors’ grant: they were locked out by the impossibly high prices that this grant has helped generate over the 30 years since it was first invented,” says Keen.

Keen says former prime minister Kevin Rudd’s doubling and tripling of the first-home owner grant from 2008 to 2010 caused the last spike in house prices, with the real beneficiaries those vendors who sold their first homes to first-home buyers – hence why Keen calls it the "‘first-home vendors’ grant" – and the banks that took the extra deposit and heaped first-home buyers with “initially three and ultimately over 10 times as much more debt”.

“The grant should be abolished, and governments should keep their hands out of asset markets.

“The O’Farrell government is still in there with its grant to purchasers of new properties, but that isn’t as damaging as the broader grant to buyers of existing properties as well.

“In that sense, I applaud the O’Farrell government for limiting the damage done to first-home buyers – and indeed the economy – by the grant,” he says in a column for Business Spectator.

Keen says the purpose of the first-home owners grant has never been to give first home buyers a helping hand, but has “always been used as a way of giving the economy the economic equivalent of a steroid injection”.

“First-home buyers have instead been the sacrificial lambs of an asset-price-inflation route to apparent national prosperity,” says Keen.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Keen says former prime minister Bob Hawke was the first to use a first-home buyers grant after he beat Malcom Fraser at the 1983 election, not to help first-home buyers but as a way of “reviving the housing market and perhaps the economy”.

He says it worked a treat, and allowed Paul Keating to claim the mantle of greatest treasurer ever.

But, Keen says, the grant also “supercharged house price rises”.

According to Keen, every time the government has introduced a first-home owner grant, the effect has been the same and can be observed by looking at house price before and after its introduction.

He says without government-injected stimulus, house prices have risen more or less in line with inflation, but have diverged noticeably to deliver real growth on the back of first-home owner grants.

“This is when the myth that house prices always rise took hold in the Australian psyche – without the awareness that this was not a natural phenomenon like sunrise, but took not only rising leverage from the banks, but also active intervention in the property market by both state and federal governments.

Keen is currently embroiled in a Fair Work Commission dispute with the University of Western Sydney over delays in processing his voluntary redundancy while at the same time facing a corruption watchdog enquiry after telling his economics students he could not fail any of them because they would not be able to re-sit exams due to the university no longer offering an Economics degree course.

A tribunal hearing involving Keen and UWS began yesterday in Sydney while UWS has already referred the matter to ICAC.

Keen tweeted that it was confidential hearing at the request of the university.

Keen explained what he told his students in an interview with ABC News radio yesterday.

“I told the students that I would not fail anyone given the circumstances that their subject was quite possibly being abolished and they were told about it two weeks before the exam for that subject would take place and of course if they failed, there wouldn't necessarily be a subject there for them to repeat the following year and I certainly wouldn't be teaching it so in that situation I just couldn't see how I could fail anybody.

He says he “probably overstepped the mark”, but claims UWS has “blown the matter out of proportion as part of a battle over the cuts to economics”.

Keen says he has been invited to two universities in London to apply for professorships and has also applied to his alma mater, the University of Sydney, for the professorship of political economy.
</body></html>

State handouts turned first-home owners into “sacrificial lambs”: Steve Keen

Property developer One Living, backed by former Macquarie banker turned investment manager Chris Green’s investment firm, has unveiled plans to bring more institutional capital into housing to help address the national supply crisis.

The New York-based investor has focused his firm, GreenPoint Partners, on addressing the supply shortage hitting middle market housing in Australia.

It is backing the new One Living business to develop more than 1000 units along the eastern seaboard. The new firm is starting with a development on Mona Vale Road, on the border of Mona Vale and Pymble, in Sydney’s Northern Beaches, with around 140 apartments planned. They are eyeing off more sites across the city.

With cost pressures rising in the industry, One Living’s model is to be a vertically integrated developer-builder, so it can respond directly to the housing gap by removing the cost inefficiencies embedded in traditional residential delivery.

“We are building a platform designed to operate at scale and starting in a market where there’s a clear need for quality, attainable housing,” One Living joint managing director Joseph Scuderi said.

“It’s that missing middle – it’s that attainable end of housing… that’s what most Australians invest into and what Australians can actually afford.”

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="798dfa93-4941-4db6-a696-31e9dc18e81c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.31.50%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=mKBqi5C_DmeiXS.AtJkcR8LQIxqCqmFi" />

GreenPoint Partners brings years of experience assembling and scaling real estate operating businesses across major markets. And Green sees a big opportunity in Australia.

“For its size, sophistication and importance to the community, Australia’s living sector has remained largely under-institutionalised, which represents significant opportunity,” Green said. “GreenPoint identified that gap, assembled the right team, and is backing One Living to build a platform that is aligned to market needs.”

Green said being a builder-developer would give the company the capacity and flexibility it required to deliver reasonably-priced homes.

“We want it to be at that attainable level; not super high end luxury but at that attainable level,” he said.

<img alt="Mona Vale" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="74a5344a-4b26-4d4a-ada3-056b1220be77" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%202.32.15%E2%80%AFPM.png?VersionId=vY8hXHO4reBMdO8ZXMWCNtGZJofUPQ3j" />

&nbsp;

One Living will undertake a component of affordable housing in its schemes, which it will own and operate, and it could also run build-to-rent on some sites.

Green praised local policy settings.

“The NSW government is being very supportive, strategic and pragmatic in terms of how do we generate more supply of housing,” he said. “We think it’s actually positive for development and the bit that’s been lacking at that attainable level is that it’s lots of relatively small private developers, whereas we want to create an institutional platform.”

One Living is also&nbsp;looking at high-density projects and could take on more institutional funding in the future.

“The way we will be able to achieve economies of scale is through size,” Green added.

Joel Robinson

One Living enters Sydney's new apartment market with Northern Beaches site acquisition

It's been several years since there's been an opportunity to buy a brand new townhome in Melbourne's coastal suburb of Mordialloc. Even apartment developments in recent times have been few and far between in the area.

Local developer LDS Property identified the gap in new housing, securing a site on White Street, directly opposite&nbsp;Woodlands Golf Club Mordialloc. They've recently launched&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/wm-residences-mordialloc-102-white-street-mordialloc-vic-3195">WM Residences</a>, just 13 townhouses which they have already started building.

Projects by Buxton Director Heath Thompson, who is selling WM Residences, says the townhouses x that perfect middle ground be

"Mordialloc residents have had limited options to downsize within the suburb, often forcing them to look elsewhere despite long-standing ties to the area," Thompson says.

"With very little comparable new supply coming to market, projects like WM Residences are well placed, particularly as buyers look to capitalise on current conditions amid constrained supply."

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6109]

The development, designed by regarded architecture firm&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/ewert-leaf">Ewert Leaf</a>,&nbsp;adopts a deliberately restrained architectural approach, focusing on simplicity, durability and liveability rather than overt design gestures.

The boutique scale is central to the offering. With only 13 three-bedroom residences, each home is configured to prioritise functional layouts and everyday use, supported by private terraces and secure two-car garages.

Ewert Leaf’s design response leans into a calm, neutral material palette. Interiors are defined by oak flooring, white walls and soft finishes, creating a consistent and understated backdrop. The approach avoids trend-driven detailing in favour of longevity, with an emphasis on natural light and spatial clarity.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6110]

Beyond aesthetics, the homes are designed to meet contemporary performance expectations. Each residence targets a minimum 6-star energy rating, incorporating double glazing, comprehensive insulation and all-electric Bosch appliances.

The project’s location supports a walkable coastal lifestyle, sitting within close proximity to Mordialloc’s foreshore, Main Street retail strip and the train station. Local cafés and dining venues, including Suburbia Deli and Hendriks Café, are within a short walk, reinforcing the area’s established neighbourhood character.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=134646 project_image_fid=6116]

While <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/mordialloc-vic-3195">Mordialloc</a> is often defined by its beach and pier, the project taps into other areas of day to day living, offering easy access to local food, casual dining and transport, rather than positioning itself purely as a lifestyle retreat.

WM Residences reflects a continued trend across Melbourne’s coastal suburbs towards smaller-scale, design-led townhouse developments, particularly on infill sites where proximity to amenity is already established.

With construction commenced prior to its market entry, the project aligns with a growing preference among buyers for developments with visible progress and defined delivery timeframes.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=134646]

WM Residences fills gap in Mordialloc townhouse market

&nbsp;

Developer GURNER™ Group has revealed $1.65 billion in residential sales nationally across the 12 months to December 2025, driven largely by the continued momentum of its Docklands wellness-focused precinct, Elysium Fields.

The sales result was generated across seven projects in Victoria and New South Wales, headlined by Elysium Fields, GURNER™’s $2.75 billion mixed-use precinct planned for Harbour Esplanade in Docklands.

The project has recorded more than $500 million in sales across the first three towers, equating to around 580 apartments sold.

The first tower, Helios, has now sold out of its 240 private residences, with GURNER™ preparing to release a premium penthouse collection comprising 15 three-bedroom penthouses in coming weeks.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370975]

Elysium Fields is being developed on the long-held 20,000 sqm Docklands site at 208-226 Harbour Esplanade, which had remained undeveloped for more than two decades prior to GURNER™ taking over the project around four years ago.

Construction has now commenced across four towers ranging between 18 and 30 storeys, with Hamilton Marino and Maxcon appointed as builders.

Once complete, the precinct is expected to comprise around 1,100 residences, alongside retail, hospitality and public realm uses integrated throughout the site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370981]

Designed by Fraser &amp; Partners in collaboration with GURNER™ Design House, the project has been positioned around the developer’s broader focus on wellness-led residential living.

“We don’t sell apartments. We create a true luxury lifestyle that simply doesn’t exist elsewhere in the market today,” Founder and Executive Chairman Tim Gurner said.

“To deliver that requires an extraordinary level of detail, coordination and discipline across multiple verticals, from design and hospitality through to wellness and service.”

“We’ve always believed that living extends far beyond the physical residence. It’s about how you feel the moment you arrive, how you live day-to-day, and the ecosystem that supports that.” 
[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370977]

The project’s design places a heavy focus on landscaping, wellness amenities and biophilic design principles.

Plans include around 3,700 sqm of landscaped gardens and open space throughout the precinct, alongside a retail and dining offering spanning approximately 5,000 sqm.

The broader public realm strategy centres around what GURNER™ describes as the “Path of Life”, an urban forest and landscaped pedestrian environment intended to connect the various buildings and wellness spaces across the precinct.

The apartments themselves will incorporate a range of wellness-focused inclusions, including purified air and water systems, circadian lighting, antimicrobial surfaces, and optional in-home wellness upgrades.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370980]

Gurner said the company’s experience through its Saint Haven wellness clubs had directly informed the residential offering now being incorporated into Elysium Fields.

“We’re seeing a clear global shift toward longevity, performance and proactive health,” Gurner said.

“Our role is to deliver that in a way that feels seamless, highly private and beautifully resolved within the environments we create.”

A large component of the wellness offering is planned through the resident amenity and health facilities proposed within the precinct.

That includes plans for bathing and recovery facilities spread throughout the towers, incorporating mineral pools, saunas, steam rooms, flotation therapy, red light therapy and wellness lounges.

The developer is also seeking approvals for what it describes as a “reverse ageing medical clinic” within the precinct.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370978]

According to project information released by the group, the proposed facility would include cryotherapy, IV infusion therapy, infrared and dry saunas, PEMF beds, MRIs, DEXA scans, brain scans and blood analysis services.

Within the first tower, Helios, residents will also have access to a dedicated amenity offering known as the Sky Private Club.

The upper 15 levels of the building will include private lounges, dining spaces, rooftop amenities and optional private wellness studios integrated within residences.

The Helios tower itself comprises 260 apartments ranging between 60 sqm and 300 sqm, including a collection of penthouses.

That includes a planned two-storey penthouse spanning around 600 sqm with uninterrupted bay views.

The Elysium Fields precinct is being delivered in partnership with Digital Harbour Holdings, a consortium that includes the Liberman family, which controls the development rights across the Docklands site.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=144441 project_image_fid=370979]

The sales result comes as GURNER™ continues expanding its national development pipeline beyond Victoria.

“We have a strong pipeline across Australia and are now focused on scaling into key markets including New South Wales and Queensland, while continuing to build on our Melbourne base,” Gurner said.

“We currently have more than $3 billion in the market, growing to over $5 billion by October, and expect to materially outperform last year in the 2026 calendar year.”

The result also reflects the continued strength of the upper-end apartment market in Melbourne, particularly for owner-occupier-focused product with large-scale amenity and lifestyle offerings.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=144441]

Record result anchored by the Group’s “utopian” Elysium Fields precinct – defying market headwinds in Docklands.

Elysium Fields drive Gurner to $1.65 billion in apartment sales over 2025

National Australia Bank (NAB) will fund <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/palmera-residences-gold-coast-18-garfield-terrace-surfers-paradise-qld-4217">Palmera</a>, a $1 billion, 52-level luxury residential tower being developed by Central Equity in one of the Gold Coast’s most tightly held coastal locations at Northcliffe.

The project, launched recently by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/central-equity">Central Equity</a>, one of Victoria’s largest private residential developers, comes at a time when construction funding for large residential developments has become increasingly competitive as lenders tighten exposure to the sector.

Multiplex has been appointed the builder, and construction is now underway.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365784]

Since its first project, Central Equity has delivered more than 85 residential developments with a combined end value exceeding $8 billion.

Palmera reflects Central Equity’s growing focus on the Gold Coast luxury apartment market and continues a relationship between Central Equity and NAB that dates back to the late 1980s, when the bank funded one of Melbourne’s earliest inner-city residential towers at a time when high-rise apartment living in the CBD was largely unproven.

“NAB’s funding of Central Equity’s $36 million CBD development in the late 1980’s to the financing of the billion-dollar tower today highlights the long-term relationship between the two organisations in delivering major residential projects” said Central Equity Founder and Chairman Eddie Kutner.

He said NAB’s early support was instrumental in helping establish the company’s development model.

“When we commenced our first residential tower in the late 1980s the concept of funding off-the-plan apartments was still largely untested in Australia,” Kutner said.

“NAB recognised the opportunity early and supported the project when others were uncertain. That relationship has now continued for more than 37 years across many developments.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365771]

Central Equity was established in 1987 when Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank precinct were still dominated by warehouses and commercial buildings. Fewer than 100 residents lived in Southbank at the time, and large-scale residential development in the inner city was not widely considered.

Recognising changing demographics and lifestyle preferences, the company began developing high-rise residential projects designed to bring permanent residents into the city centre.

Central Equity has provided accommodation for approximately 40,000 residents across Melbourne’s CBD and Southbank, while also incorporating supporting infrastructure including essential lifestyle facilities like retail spaces, childcare facilities and neighbourhood activity centres.

Central Equity has spent many years assembling the Palmera development site on the corner of Garfield Terrace and Frederick Street in Northcliffe, creating a supersite of around 3,300 sqm.

The developer said the Palmera apartment tower reflects its long-term view of the Gold Coast as a growing and increasingly diversified economy.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=108274 project_image_fid=365768]

Supported by infrastructure including the light rail network, major road upgrades expanded education, hospital and medical facilities and continued expansion at the Gold Coast Airport with more international and domestic flights.

Positioned in the tightly held Northcliffe precinct, the 52-level tower will deliver 347 apartments, targeting buyers seeking a high-end coastal lifestyle, from downsizers to interstate investors.

Designed by Marchese Partners with interiors by DBI, Palmera has been conceived as a next-generation residential offering, featuring a collection of oversized apartments, with premium three-bedroom residences offering sweeping northern views stretching from Surfers Paradise through to Burleigh Heads.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=108274]

NAB funds $1 billion Surfers Paradise apartment development, Palmera

Two years after completing one of the newest developments in North Sydney, developer <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/aqualand-australia">Aqualand</a> is turning its attention to the rapidly evolving St Leonards apartment market.

The developer, which completed AURA by Aqualand on North Sydney's Walker Street, has lodged plans for a 5,918 sqm site at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/33-37-herbert-street-st-leonards-nsw-2065">33-37 Herbert Street, St Leonards,</a> seeking approval for a pair of residential towers rising above a shared podium opposite Royal North Shore Hospital.

The proposal forms part of the broader transformation underway across the St Leonards-Crows Nest precinct, where former industrial and commercial sites are increasingly being redeveloped into high-density mixed-use projects tied to major transport infrastructure.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="2cc428cf-fe70-4cac-9cd5-264ad53af62c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.56%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=otKSnHtbjAvAddOnovyXQMgcAwE6DMe1" />

According to the planning documents, the site sits “within the St Leonards–Crows Nest Strategic Centre, identified by the NSW Government as a key area for accommodating future jobs and housing across Sydney.”

The proposal has been designed by fjcstudio, formerly FJMT Studio, and is being progressed through the State Significant Development pathway due to its scale and affordable housing provision.

The scheme would comprise 413 apartments, including 46 affordable housing units, alongside retail and commercial uses fronting Herbert Street. The project would also include communal open space, landscaping, a swimming pool, gymnasium, children’s play areas and podium-level resident amenities.

Planning documents show the development would consist of a part-13, part-39 storey tower form positioned above a four-storey podium.

“The development comprises a unified podium that activates the street interface, and two setback towers to accommodate new housing supply while maintaining an appropriate human scale at ground level,” fjcstudio noted in its Design Report.

The northern and southern towers have been shaped to respond to the surrounding skyline while also limiting overshadowing impacts to nearby public open space, particularly Talus Reserve.

The design report said the differing tower heights were intended to “contribute to a varied skyline while responding to the surrounding built form context and solar access considerations.”

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="36da62dc-ff9e-41f2-a7e3-7be38373751c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.45%E2%80%AFAM_0.png?VersionId=Mo6Rp2r.XRLTzIfg_PEEpw8NepDH8UBs" />

The site sits directly opposite Royal North Shore Hospital and within walking distance of both St Leonards Station and the new Crows Nest Metro station.

While the site itself sits just outside the formal Crows Nest Transport Oriented Development boundary, the planning documents repeatedly reference its alignment with the broader TOD objectives reshaping the Lower North Shore.

“The site is located adjacent to St Leonards Station and in close proximity to Crows Nest Metro which is within the Crows Nest Transit Orientated Development Accelerated Precinct which has been identified by the NSW Government to support housing delivery,” the Design Verification Statement noted.

According to fjcstudio, the project has been designed to respond to the broader transition occurring across St Leonards, where increasing residential density is being concentrated around transport infrastructure and employment hubs.

“The broader precinct is undergoing significant change, with a mix of existing mid-rise buildings and newer high-density developments,” the report stated.

“Recent and approved projects indicate a consistent shift toward taller built form, typically organised as tower-and-podium typologies with more active ground levels.”

The proposal includes close to 6,000 sqm of retail and commercial space across the ground floor and podium levels, designed to create a more activated street edge along Herbert Street.

Aqualand’s plans would also introduce a landscaped podium shared between the two towers, with communal open space in the form of a podium rooftop designed to support resident interaction and improve urban greening outcomes. The scheme would also introduce pocket parks at the northern and southern ends of the site, including a landscaped area at the corner of Herbert and Ella streets designed to improve pedestrian amenity and soften the streetscape.

&nbsp;

The proposal is being progressed through the NSW Government’s Housing Delivery Authority pathway, which was introduced to accelerate housing supply across the state. The application was declared State Significant Development in April 2025 following an expression of interest process.

<img alt="Aqualand" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="faf6d97d-2671-454f-b85a-fe1c6a7be608" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Screenshot%202026-05-28%20at%209.51.49%E2%80%AFAM.png?VersionId=diVd28OBVr5.YV.7prrOz.uAanwwwm7a" />

St Leonards has been particularly active with new developments in recent weeks. Developer SP Setia’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-sp-setia-targets-st-leonards-skyline-with-40-storey-tod-tower">plans for a new 42-storey tower</a> recently went on exhibition through the same pathway, while <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/first-look-stockland-plans-52-storey-538-apartment-st-leonards-tower">Stockland’s 52-storey tower proposal</a> was also recently unveiled.

Aside from the St Leonards project, which is expected to take around nine months to move through the approvals process ahead of a potential 2027 launch, Aqualand is also preparing to launch Boronia, a new apartment project in Roseville comprising around 111 apartments on Larkin Street.

The developer also has approvals in place for the next stage of the Barangaroo precinct, which will feature new residential, retail, hospitality and community uses, alongside a new metro entry across the five-hectare site.

More than 50 new retail destinations are planned for Central Barangaroo, alongside a 270-metre-long boulevard connecting Hickson Park to Nawi Cove. Together with Harbour Park, more than 50 per cent of the precinct will comprise public open space and parkland.

Larry Schlesinger

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News