<html><body>
A new financial year begins this month and for some lucky people, it may bring a handsome income tax return along with it. If you are expecting a nice return and intend to add this to, or make a start to, a deposit for your first property purchase, well done!
Whether it be that first home purchase that you hope will leapfrog you into an investment career, or making that first property buy an investment, as you save for your deposit over the years leading up, you’ll have plenty of time on your hands to prepare. As you get within a few months of your target property purchase time; the due diligence and research you need to conduct ramps up considerably.
But what if you are still a year, two years, or further, away from purchasing? Other than saving the money in your bank account, there is plenty that can be done, so today I’ll cover off some basics that you should really be doing in this slow build-up. <a imageanchor="1" href="https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-zwd_PXqYuuE/Uc6Nf3c9l2I/AAAAAAAAAf8/ijz839PsA4g/s850/Buying+your+first+property+home+investment+in+Australia+tips+to+help+you+save+more+deposit.jpg"></a> Credit history – Sort out those credit cards and personal loans Though you may be more than twelve months away from applying for a mortgage, it is important you start to build a positive credit rating, and for two reasons:
-          Firstly, if you have several credit cards, a personal loan, and any outstanding unpaid debts or bill, you can imagine how poorly this reflects on your credit history, and restricts your borrowing capacity if you still have all these overheads when you make your application. Against some popular belief though, sometimes having just one or two personal debts (like a single credit card or modest personal loan) that features a diligent (never late; and where possible; beyond making the ‘minimum repayment’) and sterling payment history. This can be good evidence of a committed repayment-maker, and may work favourably for some applicants.
-          More importantly though; if your property goals are very ambitious and you perhaps have not formed good spending and saving habits, now is a good time to reign that in and take stock of your self-discipline and self-restraint. Having entered my thirties recently, I have become a much more disciplined and well-budgeted individual compared to my early twenties. These days though, it is not uncommon for young Australians in their late teens and early twenties to develop property ambitions early on. I purchased my first property when I was twenty-five and I can tell you, in the two years or so leading up to that achievement, I really had to take stock of credit card debts and begin showing an evidenced savings approach. It is important to do this to avoid future disappointment.
 
Mortgage Broker – Get one to do a borrowing capacity check now, even if you do not use them Most mortgage brokers effectively work ‘for free’ to their client. Like some ‘no win, no fee’ solicitors, mortgage brokers typically only get paid for their service as a commission from the lender once you are unconditionally approved for, and take up, a mortgage with a lender.
However, lenders offer so much more than just helping with the process and finding you the best rates/package features in the market.
Lenders have access to software that allows them to do a run across dozens and dozens of lenders, using your personal data, to give a pretty precise ‘maximum lend capacity’ for each of the lenders. Also, they will identify which lenders, after considering your current (or future-predicted) financial situation, will flat-out refuse to lend to you (or lend to you an amount or a product that does not work for you).
So contact a broker now, give them either your current financial situation/current deposit amount, or a future-predicted situation in twelve or more months’ time and have them run their report on who will lend to you, and by how much. Sometimes the results are startling – and this can be positive or negative.
If the amount you had in mind is nowhere near the reality of even the most generous lender’s maximum lend rate, it could be a time to reassess your goals or rethink your first purchase strategy. Conversely, if your aspirations are more conservative, you may be pleasantly surprised by how much various lenders will give you, assuming a certain set of personal circumstance variables.  <a imageanchor="1" href="https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-3JLIr19tu-8/Uc6NfuN6SuI/AAAAAAAAAgA/zmQLdN9t-RU/s500/Saving+for+your+first+house+purchase+Australia+research+how+to+save+for+your+first+property+and+tips+and+tricks+to+do+this.jpg"></a> Develop a ‘property needs assessment and usage over time’ document This does not need to be ‘War and Peace’. Rather it should simply be a bullet-pointed word document that forms the plan for how you intend to you use this property over time and what the ‘must-haves’ for this property are. This is really just to ensure you form a plan and stick to it.
It is no good saving up for a modest apartment to use solely as an investment property; then twelve months down the track when your savings goal is achieved, you throw the plan out the window and decide you want to by a lavish home to live in instead. This will throw back to the drawing board, right at the time when you should be ready to act/execute on all of the planning and due diligence you’d done.
This could see you making hasty or foolish buying decisions in light of an inconsistent or poorly kept-to plan.
This comes back to what I mentioned earlier about developing self-discipline. It is important to have goals and stick to them. The other element of this plan is how the property will be used over time. Though I am a big advocate of purchasing property for a single use (say, home or investment) and not detouring from that usage, I have made exceptions to this for a couple of property purchases over the years too.
So this plan will look very different depending on whether it is bought as a home or as an investment. Here is a shortlist of questions to consider answering, in writing your list:
Home purchase: -          Is it a starter home? I.e. something modest that you’ll have for just a few years, then upgrade when you have the means to move into a bigger/more expensive home. -          Will it always be a home? I.e. will you sell it to move to a bigger home, or keep it as an investment, thereby changing the property usage? If so, have a think about what the ramifications of this will be, before you buy. -          Are you looking for a home that is established, renovated already, with not a thing to do? Or, are you looking at taking something on that requires a bit of work over the first few years, to bring up to scratch?
Investment property: -          What is your risk profile? Identify how much risk you are willing to take on and this will usually dictate the area, type of dwelling, and overall investment you pursue. -          Is this the only one? Do you just want one investment that you can keep over the years and pay off over time, so you have it as a revenue-stream when you retire? Or is this the first of what you want to be many investment properties? Think about the consequences. -          Depending on how you answer the above question; what are you seeking most from this investment – capital growth (the property increasing in overall potential sale value over time), or rent return (where the monthly rent more than pays for all expenses and produces you positive income each month).
In a utopian world, we’d all be buying properties that can do both; but this is often a challenge to find! Particularly for your investment property you may be better off pursuing on type of return initially.
Investors who are content with buying one property only typically focus more on capital growth over time. Portfolio-builder on the other hand will sometimes value rental return more; as it can enable them to have good enough cash-flow to progress to their second purchase and beyond.
 
Educate yourself – You need to do this proactively; wisdom is rarely imparted, rather it is requested You have plenty of time up your sleeve while you are saving, so it is time to school up! Be like an interrogator with information that comes to you. Some would-be buyers take a passive approach to this, casually overhearing conversations with friends, or flipping through a magazine and a story on property happens to come up.
Whilst this can be nice to get a feel for the climate, this is not proactive research. Proactivity means you need to seek out independently, the answers that matter to you, rather than being influenced by other people’s casual conversations or news-grabbing dramatic headlines about the property market/industry.
Even as you read this article; ask yourself – ‘did I casually stumble upon it and read it because I was bored?’ Or were you actively Google-searching something like ‘how to buy your first house’ or something similar? Once you have written your word document above, you’ll have lots of questions you’ve created for yourself.
Pursue these answers proactively and independently; and do not be afraid of being taken on a tangent every time you learn something new (I.e. you open a second browser window to search about something you read in the first browser window!).
As I say above, I believe that wisdom is rarely imparted, rather it is requested. In the end though, the key to planning a successful first property buy – be it home or investment – is to remain active.
Do not become passive and do not push out all of your pre-purchase tasks as ‘things I can do later’. Instead of using your feet to toe-tap and wait for information and opportunities to come to you, use your feet to hit the pavement and start preparing. The key to a successful purchase – and especially to a successful property investment – lies in proactivity and planning, so get started now!
Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://propertyspectator.blogspot.com.au/">Property Correspondent.</a>
</body></html>

cmcevoy-Go82SmsJA9

Taking the first steps towards your first home: Cameron McEvoy

<html><body>
It was reported recently in October 2013, the NSW state government made the largest monthly windfall on stamp duty since it began recording such data trends back in 2005.
With over $350 million collected in the month of October, stamp duty is unquestionably one of the biggest revenue raisers for NSW.
However, we shouldn’t get too carried away with what, at face value, appears as a larger than usual money-grab by the state government. The increase in stamp duty revenue also needs to take into account some other market factors, such as near-record high auction clearance rates for the months of August, September, and October of 2013. It is within these two to three months that the state government’s stamp duty tax windfall reported, would have been derived from.
It is safe to call a spade and spade and realise that in NSW, higher than usual auction and private sales data – and thus higher volumes of stamp duty collection as a result – is an indication of renewed buyer and market interest in residential property.
And hey, why wouldn’t there be?
The current property market climate has been something of a perfect storm for home buyers and investors alike in recent months. This is especially evident in NSW. Though housing affordability challenges continue to persist, there are just too many well-received positive factors at play that are stirring home buyer and investor market activity. These include:
-          Some of the lowest interest rates on offer of all time
-          Not only are rates low, but some of the most competitive and cost-efficient two-year, three-year, and five-year fixed interest rate deals are on offer. These deals are ‘security’ music to a first home buyer’s ears
-          Though affordability remains a challenge, property values throughout most of NSW have not risen in as high a proportion as other states in the past 12-24 months
-          Previously the construction industry was in a slump, however it is starting to heave back into prosperity and with more construction upstarts and projects commencing, buyer confidence levels boost
As an investor, my view on stamp duty is in a constant state of flux. Though it prohibits many first home buyers from entering the market initially, it can be argued that it also prevents first home buyers entering the market foolishly and setting themselves up for failure. Yes, saving that initial first home deposit will take a little longer due to the needed stamp duty capital being raised, however it also means buyers need to learn more diligent saving and spending habits in their quest to home ownership.
This can be a good thing for buyers who have unrealistic expectations or a view that their first home purchase should be the ‘forever dream beach house’ that they want, long term. First home buyers need to view stamp duty as a challenge; a necessary evil that means they may need to compromise on certain elements of their first property purchase.
Stamp duty also encourages would-be first home buyers to consider renting longer, and perhaps buying a more affordable investment property to start with, saving first home ownership for a few more years down the track. I personally think this is one of the smarter and more cost-efficient strategies out there.
Say for example your goal is to buy your first home, a $500,000 property, within the next few months and you have your 15% deposit saved. Here’s what you’d be up for if you bought it as a home and lived in it for three years:
-          15% deposit: $75,000 (leaving a mortgage value of $425,000)
-          LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) because you do not have the needed 20% deposit: around $4,000 (that’s $4,000 of wasted money you can never get back or make any claims on)
-          NSW stamp duty on purchase of $500,000 (payable at time of settlement, remember): $18,010 (yes, that is dead money you can never get back)
-          Other settlement costs (legal, any loan fees, searches): $2,000
-          Total upfront payable: $99,010
Assuming you take out a mostly-fixed loan product (say 30 years), two to three years of chipping away at the mortgage will not make much of a dent, because remember, most 30-year mortgages do not start to make headway until around year #5 or #6. You are also liable to pay hefty interest on your mortgage from day one, because of a substantial $425,000 sized mortgage.
In my view, a better strategy for this home buyer is to rent for a few years, but buy a cheaper investment property up front. Let’s say a modest unit or apartment in middle-outer Sydney suburbs, or a well-located property in a regional centre such as Wagga, Newcastle, or the North Coast. Let’s say you still have that $99,000 upfront budget mentioned above to spend.
-          Buy one $250,000 investment property right away
-          Put down 20% deposit (thus negating the need to pay LMI): $50,000
-          This means you have a loan amount of $200,000. I’d take out a split loan that is 60% fixed for three to five years, and 40% variable (with an offset facility that is redraw-capable). This means 40% ($80,000) of your mortgage is offset-capable
-          NSW stamp duty on $250,000: $7,260
-          Other settlement costs (same as above): $2,000
-          You are ‘all in’ for $59,260 initially
-          As for the remaining $30,000 of savings, don’t spend it, but put it into that $80,000 offset account. This means that for the first few years you are only paying interest on $50,000 of offset plus 120,000 of fixed loan = interest payable only on $170,000
-          Over years one to three you continue to rent and pour savings into that offset account, all the while reducing the interest you pay on the investment property. Then in year three, you pull out your original $30,000, plus three years’ worth of savings revenue. Assuming you save an average $20,000 per year, this will see you back at the $90,000 mark to buy your home with.
-          Oh and let’s not forget some of the tax minimisation benefits that often come with well-purchased investment properties. Even if this saves you only a couple of thousand per year, that’s still an additional $2,000 each tax year that will help to ease the mortgage stress of your big chunky home mortgage, when you are ready to buy your home.
This strategy will not work for everyone or every situation. It is not financial advice and is not to be construed or applied as such. However, it is an example of how renting for a few more years whilst having an investment property up your sleeve, can better your home-buying position later on.
Stamp duty is one of those necessary evils in the property game. It may not always be, but for now, it is. In my view, though stamp duty is an evil, it is not the real problem here – a poor buying strategy mixed with unrealistic buying expectations is. Australian property buyers need to get smarter in their home ownership aspirations and realise that the best course to take isn’t always the direct one.

<hr>
Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/">Property Correspondent.</a>
 
</body></html>

The best course to home ownership is not always the most direct one 

<html><body><div id="post-729" class="post">
<div class="entry">
April 24th, 2015 was a significant date in the Australian property investment landscape. Why? On this date, APRA (the Australian Macro Prudential Authority – an institution who helps regulates the rules of play for banks and other kinds of lenders) implemented some new rules / codes of conducts for lenders to adhere to.
The new rules mean that for some lenders who previously had very liberal lending rules and practices for local Australian property investors; had to tighten them up to comply with APRA’s policies.
Whilst it is still early days; we have seen a number of “Big 4″ lenders, as well as many other tier #2 and tier #3 lenders, begin to implement more restrictive borrowing rules for investor-based loans.
These have come in all shapes and sizes, such as (but not limited to):
- Restricting maximum LVR (loan to value ratio) allowance for ‘investment’ category mortgages from, say, 90/10 to 80/20. Part and parcel with this has been some lenders refusing to allow LMI (Lender’s Mortgage Insurance) as a capitalised cost on to loans at those higher (say, 90/10) LVR ratios.
- Removal of discounted interest rate package deals for their mortgage products; again, for investor-only mortgages (many lenders have retained discounts for owner-occupied, or PPOR – Principal place of residence – loan products)
- In light of further interest rate cuts from the RBA in recent months; some lenders have; whilst passing on rate ‘cuts’ not actually reduced their ‘calculation of repayment capability’ for mortgage applicants. What this means is, let’s say when interest rates were 0.50 basis points higher, several months ago, and lenders were calculating an applicant’s serviceability based on a scenario where interest rates spiraled to say, 7% (they run these calculations as standard for all applicants); typically when RBA rates drop by 0.50 basis points; so too should the lender’s serviceability calculation assumptions (I.e. their calculation should be using a rate of say 6.50%, not 7%). However, lenders in recent months have maintained say that 7% figure in that calculation.
These changes have substantial implications for would-be property investors: 
1) The reduced LVR allowance by lenders means borrowers need to cough up more initial deposit. Say you wanted to borrow to buy a $300K investment property. Some lenders at 90/10 LVR acceptance would only require your $30K (10%) deposit, plus purchase costs. A drop to 80/20 means borrowers need to find another $30K to make up a $60K deposit.
2) Removal of discounted interest rates also is a deterrent to first-time investors entering the market, as their interest repayments will now be slightly higher than what home owners pay. There could thus be a cooling of investors being active in many markets throughout Australia.
3) For investors who remain active or don’t perceive the above two changes to inhibit their ambitions; they’ll continue with their property investment purchases. However, they simply won’t be allowed to borrow as much. If banks are calculating serviceability based on a higher ‘worst case scenario’ forecast; the banks won’t lend as much. To some investors, this could be the difference between being allowed to buy a $500K investment property, to now only perhaps $320K – $350K. If this eventuates, this will be a game-changer in the market as it’ll wipe a lot of the Sydney and Melbourne potential investor buyers out (who can play in the Sydney and Melbourne markets with &gt;$350K, these days) and into lower-median markets such as Brisbane, Adelaide, Hobart, and some regional centers.
The role of foreign investors in amongst APRA rules for local lenders: 
And what of the foreign investors? What will be the effect on foreign investor demand of APRA-inflicted local bank and non-bank lender restrictions on investment-based loans? This is hard to infer with any kind of concrete certainty; due to all data relating to foreign residential property investors (including actual volumes of them; types of financing etc.) not being readily available to the public.
As such, there is already speculation and confusion on just how many foreign investors are using the following kinds of financing for their Australian purchases:
a) Pure cash from overseas sources/local funds, to buy (no loans required). In this instance; APRA regulations on local lenders will have zero consequence on foreign buyers; or;
b) Financing/loans given by their local country’s lenders (in these instances; the lending rules imposed by APRA on local Australian institutions don’t apply – meaning foreigners may continue to have access to great cost-efficient mortgage products, for the purchase of Australian property); or;
c) Foreign buyers who are accessing local Australian lender mortgage products. For this type of foreign buyer; the APRA rules will have the same consequence as for local buyers.
When comparing drivers for foreign investors to local investors, we must be mindful that there are so many more variables beyond purely the loan or finance structure of choice, that affects their overall attraction to buying property in this country. For instance; exchange rates, FIRB levies or taxes they must pay, the type and condition of the housing stock they have access to, to purchase, are just a few of the many other factors related to foreign investor demand in this country’s residential housing stock.
So – and I must stress this is pure speculation based on the resources and news I’ve been reading on this subject – there are two quite likely outcomes I would speculate as a result of the tighter APRA rules on local lenders, in regards to the effect of these on foreign investor interest in the market, and on residential property values as a result:
1) Local buyers (investors, not home owners) get scared off and this takes a substantial amount of ‘heat’ out of 'most' markets. I say ‘most’, because the exception (as in; the markets that will still remain hot despite the APRA rulings) will be the foreign-investor ‘obsessed’ postcodes around Australia. These are the suburbs built in areas where foreign buyers and local buyers alike; both highly desire to purchase in. I say this because though we don’t know what foreign investors are using what finance structures; a more consistent and reliable metric of measurement here, is the actual postcodes they take interest in buying within.
2) Or, more markets will remain hot anyway. Why? Because those wannabe local first home buyers (FHB’s) who were thinking of applying the recently growing strategy of ‘Keep renting and buy an investment property now instead of a home; to kick start some growth so I can have enough money for a home deposit later on’, will throw that strategic approach straight out the window and say ‘nope, forget investment, the APRA rules don’t make it worth the effort; I’m going to go for that home purchase straight off the bat; better rates, discounts, and possibly LVR’s (depending on their chosen lender…) so I might as well go ‘all-in’ and buy my dream home’. 
Unfortunately, for FHB’s who want to buy into suburbs that also happen to double as hotbeds for foreign buyers; the same bubbling of high housing prices will remain, and continue further. However, in this instance, opportunity could present for FHB’s buying in non-foreign-buyer postcodes, as the local investor volumes will dilute, which should deflate the bubble in those other postcodes enough to help FHB’s.
So, if either of these outcomes eventuate, I think it can only be a good thing for FHB’s, and less so for local investors. Foreign investors will likely remain unperturbed in their relentless pursuit of the postcodes that they so desire.
This means that in postcodes where the top 10-20 schools are, per-state (the ones where the Chinese investors specifically, are most active); prices will likely remain as high as ever.
 Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, Property Correspondent. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/contact-us/" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</div>
</div></body></html>

Liberal local lending rules tightened: Cameron McEvoy

<html><body>
In recent years, some Australians have adopted an interesting strategy of being a ‘renter-investor’. I’ve written about this previously, and it is a trend I have kept an eye on ever since.
They will actually not buy a home to begin with,  instead saving their deposit money for a property that will become an investment from day one. They will then rent for the duration of this. There are several situations or reasons why some people may opt for investment ownership instead of home ownership:
- Perhaps home ownership in the desired suburbs or areas where they most enjoy the lifestyle is too cost prohibitive to be a home owner.
- They may be a younger aspiring investor and be in a situation where they can continue to live at home with parents or relatives, rent-free, enabling them to poor their savings entirely and quickly into pure investment.
- Transient lifestyles. Those in military or international business jobs may not value home ownership much at all, as their lifestyle involves lots of travel or placement in other states and countries.
- Some investors may not see the value in home ownership in Australia. For some investors, the ongoing burden of a large mortgage may not seem to be the best use of their savings dollars.
The other option for renter-investors is to begin their investment career as a home owner, which is how I started out. Renter-investors will usually do this to qualify for any government grants, exemptions, or benefits offered to first home buyers, and then live in the property for the minimum time required. This is usually around six months. These investors will then move out of the property and into a rental property. This strategy works works well for people who:
- Cannot save enough of a deposit for the home where they want to live, but wish to invest for several years to help them eventually afford to buy a home in the area they wish to live.
- For those investors looking to maximise the initial cash-flow when first buying, via accessing government grants that are paid at time of settlement. This can enable these investors to move quicker into the purchase of investment property num,ber two.
- Those who are comfortable and flexible enough to live in a temporary home for six-12 months in an area that perhaps is not their dream area, but can view it as a necessary stepping stone to move into their desired area.
In fact, another emerging trend that goes part and parcel with the above strategy is to use home ownership as a temporary springboard into an investor life,all the while retaining a capital gain tax (CGT) exemption on one of the properties you own.
How does it work?
It goes something like this:
-          An aspiring investor will purchase their first home in whatever investment area they can afford, and through their due diligence represents solid rental return and/or capital gain potential.
-          This area probably won’t be in their desired dream suburb or where they see themselves living for a long time.
-          They then live in this property for the first six months or as long as is needed to qualify for any grants or stamp duty concessions/exemptions that are on offer by federal or state governments at the time.
-          Then, the investor will move out of their home into a rental property in the area they actually want and desire to move to, and convert their home into an investment property.
-          The investor can now continue to rent for many years and use any growth achieved in their home property as a springboard to purchase their next investment property.
-          For future CGT minimisation purposes, the investor may move back into the home property in year five or six of ownership, perhaps also doing a mild renovation whilst living there again, before moving back out again and re-renting it out.
The advantage of using this strategy, as opposed to just starting as an investor from the outset, is that the investor gets to maintain a CGT exempt ‘haven’ which will help when selling the property in the future. This is a very simplistic approach, and it gets more complex as you grow a portfolio.
It is best to consult with a professional accountant and the ATO when considering a tax-minimisation strategy across a portfolio of properties. The very general rule of thumb though, is that the ATO will only allow you to claim one residence as your principal place of residence (PPR – otherwise known as your ‘home’) for tax purposes. So as some investors grow a portfolio of multiple, even dozens, of properties, and they continue to rent elsewhere, they will usually find ways to nominate the highest-value property in their portfolio as their PPR for taxation purposes.
Renting where you want to live, whilst investing where you can afford at the time, really is a strategy that can work for young and newly-starting investors. It offers the best of both worlds; enjoying the lifestyle of the area you want to live in, whilst establishing your investment career on the property ladder, at an earlier age and time in your life. This of course is ideal, because the the earlier you can make your start on the investment property ladder, the more chance you’ll have to acquire more properties and see them grow, through to retirement age.
 
<hr>
 Cameron McEvoy is a NSW-based property investor and maintains a blog, <a href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Property Correspondent.</a>
 
</body></html>

Buying where you can afford while renting where you want to live: Cameron McEvoy

<html><body>
As a buy-and-hold investor, I’ve come across tenants of all walks of life.
Bachelors, single mums, share-house friends, retirees, young families; I thought I’d had a taste of every type of tenant possible. But then I realised, this is incredibly naïve. The truth is the diversity of the rental pool at any given time is as limitless as the diversity we find in humanity. So, I recently had my own little ‘witching hour’ of property insight recently with one such tenant.
With over seven billion people living on planet Earth, there is a practically infinite volume of lifestyles that people can live, making for so many different types of tenants that one could attract to their property.
Today I thought I’d share one such ‘out there’ example.
I recently acquired a new investment property that very much added up for me. After much due diligence on the area itself, the property itself, and some crunching of numbers, I made the decision to purchase the property.
This decision was made despite the appearance of the property which was, how do I say it, a little ‘kooky’. Upon looking at the property ad online, the property clearly appeared to be inhabited by, well... a practicing 'witch'.
Some of the interior features included:
<ul>
<li>Gothic statues hung above the kitchen cupboards</li>
<li>Animal skin rugs, an Eastern European throne chair, hanging Native American dreamcatchers, and many, many candlesticks adorned the living area</li>
<li>Dolls, fairies, tepees, more dreamcatchers, a witch’s hat, and mystical elements appeared in the bedrooms</li>
</ul>
To most prospective buyers, the creepy appearance of this property would have been enough to turn them away. Clearly, the price of the property, which was slightly below market rate for such a property in the area, was compensating for this appearance.
But to the trained investor looking a little deeper under the surface of things can sometimes fruit some great surprises. Upon further investigation, I discovered that:
<ul>
<li>The appearance, whilst full of kooky knick-knacks, was pristinely maintained. Not a speck of dust, not a single mark on the tiles, the floors squeaky clean. Clearly this tenant went to a great deal of effort to make the property appear clean – at least for the sale.</li>
<li>Why did the tenant do this? Turns out that she has been living there for 10 plus years, and had no desire to move out anytime soon. She clearly treated the property like it was her own, owned home.</li>
<li>I also learned that the tenant had been OK with incremental rental increases (in line with market rate) over the years, another good sign for the investor.</li>
<li>The body corporate of the property checked out well, as did the building and pest inspection. The townhouse was in a small complex, at the back of the block, avoiding the noise of any nearby roads.</li>
</ul>
Sometimes the quality of a tenancy applicant, or a tenant you may ‘inherit’ when you take ownership of a property, needs to be judged beyond any perceptions you have about that person based on their lifestyle.
I couldn’t care less about what a tenant in my property does in their personal life, so long as they comply within the requirements I maintain when seeking a good tenant.
These things are:
<ul>
<li>On-time payment of rent always; and understanding/respecting the odd occasion when rental rates need to increase in line with the market</li>
<li>Not damaging the property and generally looking after it</li>
<li>Reporting malfunctioning appliances, or maintenance works required; as/when they come up</li>
<li>Respecting common property areas and neighbours nearby</li>
<li>(Ideally) looking to stick around for as long as possible</li>
</ul>
If you have employed a highly skilled and competent managing agent to look after your property then they are the ones to make the best guided ‘judgement call’ on the quality of any particular tenant.
At the end of the day, astute investors need to draw up a list of the things that actually matter when seeking quality tenants and look beyond initial perceptions when weighing up tenancy selection decisions.
</body></html>

My investment property witching hour: Cameron McEvoy

<html><body>
Residential property is virtually a national pastime for many Australians around the country.
In my native city of Sydney, residential property is arguably the number number one topic of conversation at BBQs, dinners out, family gatherings, and office water coolers.
So it is no surprise then that property conversations and public discourse over the past 12 months have focused on the topic of weakened housing affordability as a (possible) result of an increase in foreign investors in the market.
The challenge in discussing it properly, of course, is that up until recently whilst some initial figures have been published by the RBA and a couple of news outlets, there hadn’t been a thorough market analysis of affordability based on foreign influence.
However the federal government has listened to concerns and as a result it has commissioned an inquiry into foreign investment in Australian residential property.
Though the study is ongoing and results are yet to be released, the initial feedback was that foreign investment in Australian residential property has not been a major contributor to any ‘price bubbling’ occurring in capital city markets throughout the country.
Further perspectives outside the governmental inquiry however, have been coming to light in recent weeks and it has been interesting to hear the views put forward.
What is certain right now, however, is that residential property buying is strong in many major capital city markets around the country.
Influential factors such as limited land supply in high demand capital city suburbs (both inner, middle, and outer ring ones), current home owners blocking higher-density construction within city limits areas, and a low interest-rate environment are all stimulating a buying frenzy among locals and foreign investors alike.
These factors have collectively led to a major values growth ‘boom’ period in several markets.
The elephant in the room though is the notion of the foreign investor – in particular the Chinese investor – who are <a href="/news/foreign-buyers-at-record-9-5-of-established-property-demand-nabs-alan-oster">accounting for small but rapidly increasing percentages</a> of all residential property buyers.
However, this is where the research may be coming up short. Like asking the question ‘which came first, the chicken or the egg?’, looking at sales data volumes over time may not account for the buyer's motivations for purchasing the properties they did; for the prices they did; during this time.
As a Sydney native who invests in this city (and is also currently looking for a home to purchase too), I’ve been privy to sentiments expressed “straight from the horses’ mouth” recently from both colleagues in the industry and other buyers ‘on the ground’.
When I am out at open home inspections most weekends, I’ve been speaking to other buyers with interest, hearing what the feedback is. It is certainly true that local buyers are ‘believe’ that foreign investors are having a significant impact, despite concrete official data confirming it.
So, the ‘real’ impact of more foreign buyers in the market could actually be a placebo-like effect. It is likely that the ‘scary thought’ of all the foreigners pushing locals out of the market is the actual catylst for locals pushing themselves out of the market! Or, the ‘FOMO’ (Fear of missing out) effect.
Regardless of your personal position or belief (however well or poorly researched it may be) on foreign investment jacking up prices for locals, the reality is that there are too many contributing factors to any property market’s growth (or indeed, lack of growth) at any one time to be sure.
One area where I do have a concern is in the ‘official’ data. One example here may be that foreign buyers (Significant Investor Visa or otherwise) are not permitted to purchase established dwellings – they are supposed to only be purchasing newly built stock.
However, most in the industry know that this is just not happening and is likely to go unchecked. Foreign buyers, especially from non-western cultures, are using one of the oldest group-buying strategies in the books, consortiums or shared-buying, to crack in to the established property market.
Article continues on the next page. Please click below.
 
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Buying through a consortium means that a distant family member or family friend who is an Australian citizen (and thus not counted as a foreign buyer) may aggregate funds from several other family/friends together who themselves are not Australian residents or citizens.
This enables for the purchase of established houses on land (often without the need for a mortgage as the funds collected between the group/consortium are usually enough to buy the house outright).
As someone who is looking for a house (not a unit), on a decent size block of land in Sydney, I can confirm that I’ve seen this in practice during inspections.
How do you I know? I’ve been engaging in conversations with would-be buyers at inspections who have told me they're using this strategy themselves.
Whilst I do not take personal issue with the notion of foreign investors buying established houses (provided that the scale/extent of this permitted does not substantially prevent local buyers from entering the market), I do take issue with the official inquiry overlooking these purchases.
Consortium-style buying is often unofficial and unstructured, making them very hard to trace and keep a paper trail on. The Australian culture of group-buying (when it actually does happen – which is highly infrequent) is all about drawing up official legal contracts, split loans, and so on (at the point of property purchase – which of course helps to keep more official records on the group buying going on).
Foreign group-buyers tend to have just one person or couple (who have either residency or citizenship status) gather all the funds separately and externally, who then brings these to the solicitor as one lump sum in cash at the point of purchase.
This makes the true nature of the transaction highly difficult to trace locally and will likely not be reflected in any official findings. That said, China’s government has recently put rules in place to make it harder for Chinese nationals to bring funds overseas for investment purposes.
It will be interesting to see the findings of the inquiry as these become available. What will be more interesting though, will be to see if any governmental action is taken thereafter.
</body></html>

How foreign buyers are cracking into the established property market

<html><body>
To the inexperienced buyer, finding a quality property at an affordable price is pretty hard to do.
Whether you are a home buyer or investor, this is very hard to do, especially in Australia’s major capital city markets.
Buyers without experience face difficulty drawing a distinction between a crappy property that is full of potential and a property that should be avoided completely.
I’ve always been intrigued by the phrase ‘buying a lemon’. Perhaps I take the opportunist view a little too much though, because this lemon phrase is very similar to ‘what do you do when life throws you lemons? You make lemonade, of course!’.
In the reality of a property context though, this is rarely true. With property it is more accurate to say that some properties are lemons, sure, but only a few of those lemons are actually ripe and ready for harvesting. Other property lemons, though, have fallen off the tree long ago; turned brown, decayed, and are utterly useless.
So, we have ‘ripe’ property lemons and ‘rotten’ property lemons.
In my experience, I would distinguish between ripe and rotten by asking oneself: ‘What are the property’s problems that I can change (cost-efficiently, of course), versus those problems that either cannot be changed or are too costly to do so?’
By no means is this a definitive list; but here are some ideas of ripe lemon (possibly worth buying) ‘problems’ compared to rotten lemon ones (deal-breakers that translate to ‘walk away now’).
<ul>
<li>Rotten Lemon Problems:</li>
</ul>
Location:
First of all comes the biggest problem one cannot change in a property; its location and the other properties surrounding it. If the property is too far away from fundamental ‘renter must-have’ proximity features (transport, work node access, shops, schools etc) than this is something you cannot change, no matter how beautiful the property itself is.
Aspect/outlook:
We cannot change the way the sun rises and sets every day, for instance (though I would like to meet anyone who could!). To some future tenants and buyers aspect is very important. Ensuring enough sunlight is given to living and communal areas is important.
Serious structural problems:
During your due diligence, building, pest and/or strata reports will identify any serious structural issues. For house buyers this will be the house itself. For unit buyers, the strata report will highlight upcoming major capital works and maintainence scheduled in coming years.
Any serious structural problems identified are almost always hugely expensive to fix. When these are identified, the property is a true rotten lemon. Whether it's an investment or a home, you’ll be up for a lump sum of cash to repair it that you may not have so readily handy once the loan itself finalises.
So what about the things you can change? And cost efficiently, too? 
Click through to the next page to find out.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 
<ul>
<li>Ripe Lemon Problems:</li>
</ul>
Outdated and ugly properties:
Drab, old, and outdated look (internally for units and both internally/externally for houses). Expert property ‘flippers’ Nathan Birch and Cherie Barber have built entire wealth strategies around this very specialty.
Ripped up ugly carpets can expose beautiful floorboards; cheap fresh paint can add exponential value and appeal, and so on. Inexpensive light (cosmetic) renovation can help bring what looks like a ‘dud’ property up to scratch.
The problem is, selling agents are keenly aware that buyers know how to spot these properties and accordingly the discounting offered may not offset that cosmetic renovation outlay required.
Ugly, cluttered yards:
Poorly presented properties frequently feature cluttered rear yards, sometimes overgrown, or with poorly placed/planted trees and overgrown garden beds. Buyers need to look beyond this to realise this property may not be a lemon and could offer scope for future improvement.
Not enough bedrooms:
More of a house opportunity than a unit one; but consider the problem of too few bedrooms. If the property is especially discounted and the major reason is, say, it is a two bedroom house in an area where three bedrooms is the expectation, there may be scope to cost efficiently reset some internal walls to create a third bedroom.
In older houses this is usually done by consolidating large laundry rooms into kitchen cupboard laundries (when a kitchen is also being renovated) and re-purposing that laundry space.
Awkward layouts:
If it is an older house it may feature an awkward layout that impractical to today’s families/inhabitant types. However, this is another example of ‘ugly duckling’ perceptions; particularly if, at first inspection, the rooms are being incorrectly presented.
How many times have property photos showed dining rooms being used as studies/offices, and so on?
If priced accordingly, there may be an opportunity to consider a poorly laid out property if there is scope to easily move some rooms around later on to suit a better layout.
</body></html>

Making lemonade from property lemons: How to pick the properties ripe for renovation

<html><body>
Over the weekend I attended the Sydney Home Buyer and Property Investor Show, at Sydney’s Olympic Park. Having visited the show every year since 2011, I was on the lookout for any new trends and shifts in booth exhibitor types.
Below are some observations I made about the 2014 show in comparison to recent years. Of course, the types of companies that were exhibiting may not be reflective of overall market demands and shifts. However, it does offer an insight into to the changes year on year and this variety of show booths helps as a measuring stick of the trends emerging in the Sydney/NSW markets, from both a home buyer and residential property investor perspective.
 
<ol>
<li>
Lender exhibitors shift focus Every year, the major Tier #1 and Tier #2 lenders exhibit and 2014 was no exception. What I did find interesting this year was the promotional shift towards ‘service’ loan product features over others like rate and inclusions/features. In a low-rate environment this makes sense for lenders as it may become hard to discern and differentiate mortgage products based on rate alone. 
</li>
<li>
Exhibitor stands providing bilingual signage is on the up This has been present for many years; with traditionally a number of developer and ‘off the plan’ sales stalls printing their signage and leaflets/info packs in both English and <a href="https://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/article84.htm" target="_blank">Simplified Chinese</a>. However this year, in my observation (and I wasn’t counting precisely), the uplift of bi-lingual signage stands was substantial. Almost every developer and/or property sales stall was bilingual, with some of them even being Simplified Chinese-only. Also, several of the major and minor lenders featured bilingual signage. 
</li>
<li>
More focus on ‘first timer’ small scale developments Peter Koulizos gave a lecture on small-scale developments 101, and it was easily one of the biggest crowd-drawers during the show. Small developments have been a minor focus of previous shows however there was a clear sustained interest in this topic during this show. Similarly, Cherie Barber’s Renovating For Profit show also drew large crowds, as they often do each year. Several magazines have given extra attention to small developments in the last six months and this could indicate a market shift towards development versus passive investment. 
</li>
<li>
Homes with attached granny flats and second dwellings at the back Detached granny flat companies have been consistently prominent in the last couple of years at the show, however this year there was a clear dominance of developers and builders offering home builds that come complete with an attached granny flat/second dwelling at the back of the property. Think of these as duplexes where the second dwelling is hidden away behind the first. The clear difference was that these properties, unlike duplexes, sit on one title, on one block. From an investor perspective this might be a little unappealing, however for home buyers/builders, this approving could offer a handy value-add. 
</li>
<li>
Off the plan apartments ever prominent Another observation consistent with previous years was the prominence of off-the-plan apartment developers selling their product. Many of these are in high density residential towers being built in most eastern seaboard capital cities around Australia. I did observe a number of international developers too; with offerings in Indonesia, Great Britain, and New Zealand. Interestingly, USA-based property spruikers were lower in volume this year compared to previous years. Below are some photos taken of some of the major speakers who presented during seminars and lectures on the day.
</li>
</ol>
 
<img class=" wp-image-698 aligncenter" src="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Sydney-Home-Show-2014-1.jpg" alt="Sydney Home Show 2014 - 1" width="576" height="346">
<img class="aligncenter wp-image-696" src="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Sydney-Home-Show-2014-4.jpg" alt="Sydney Home Show 2014 - 4" width="576" height="346">
<img class="aligncenter wp-image-695" src="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Sydney-Home-Show-2014-3.jpg" alt="Sydney Home Show 2014 - 3" width="576" height="346">
Photos: Author.
</body></html>

Five observations from the Sydney Home Buyer and Property Investor Show

<html><body>
Foreign residential property investment is arguably the hottest topic in Australian property circles right now.
Whether it is at a BBQ, dinner party, or casual drinks after work, when the topic of ‘house hunting’ or property pops up shortly after the topic of foreign investors gets introduced.
Prime Minister Tony Abbott has declared Australia is ‘open for business’ and this sentiment has certainly extended to foreign investment in our residential property class.
Though foreign national investment in single family homes, apartments, and units has been a common occurrence for years in this country, there has been an undeniable upswell in foreign investor-purchased property in the six months of 2014 thus far.
So is this a good thing or a bad thing?
Though market commentators and economists are divided on whether the influence of large waves of foreign investors are having a positive or negative effect on the residential property market, foreign investor influence is certainly being felt in capital city markets.
However, unlike other commodities and investment classes that foreigners ‘can’ buy into in this country, residential property is a delicate asset class; unlike gold, shares, natural resources, technology, and even commercial/industry property investment, residential property investment has social and societal consequences, not just economic ones.
Positive: Investors bring wealth into Australia
Foreign investors bring new money into Australia, greatly influencing our economy. This investment can return dividends for our wider economy as it stimulates further growth into our cities and potentially a better quality of services.
Negative: Higher foreign investor demand could artificially ramp up prices and drive overall housing unaffordability
Yes, this is cited by most Australians who complain about foreign housing investors. Though many Aussies may form this view based on hearsay and/or a lack of researched opinion, the truth is they may be right. The city of Vancouver in Canada is a perfect case study of this. Canada’s relaxed ‘Immigrant Investor Program’ was introduced back in the 1980s and basically enabled for a wealthy foreign national to ‘buy’ their way into becoming a Canadian national, simply by investing a fairly small ($800,000) loan to the Canadian government. The government would then pay back the investor over a five year period and issue a visa in return.
Many of these people purchased investment property specifically in Vancouver, and then left again. However, the buying frenzy over many years saw Vancouver become one of the least affordable cities to live in in the world; with residential property becoming hugely unaffordable for median-to-above-average Canadian income-earners who lived there. The tap was turned off however, in 2012 when the program was abolished. There are concerns by Australians that a similar approach could happen here. 
Positive: Our construction industry gets a much needed boost
Our construction industry – which collectively and peripherally employs over one million Australians – benefits immensely as new residential estates and apartment buildings are demanded by investors, construction companies are employed to build them, thus creating jobs and stimulating the economy. 
Negative: Money laundering on a global scale?
Though Australia welcomes foreign cash injection into Australia, foreign investor funds into residential property are usually pretty unregulated. With a number of investors simply paying cash outright for developments off the plan, the developer takes the cash on a ‘no questions asked’ basis.
The lack of paper trail means that Australia runs the risk of accepting funds that could be ‘dirty money’. Once word gets out of the ease with which funds can be routed into residential properties, Australia runs a risk of an upswell in corrupt foreign funds entering the country. 
Article continues on the next page. Please click below.
<hr class="system-pagebreak">
Positive: City planning ensures that construction projects get approved in highest-demand areas
Several cities such as Sydney have faced residential property undersupply issues in their highest demand suburbs and working nodes for years, and foreign investment could help resolve this. Local council areas will consider medium and high-density planning applications by developers in much-needed areas that may not have been possible had there not been enough foreign investor interest to get the project off the ground. Foreign investment helps to encourage construction of higher density housing in these areas to meet current demand. 
Negative: Not everyone wants to live in a shoebox
It is a good thing that foreign investors are helping to build high-density housing (apartment towers) where they are needed most. In high-demand suburbs not everyone wants to live this way.
Developers can make higher profit margins on towers of this scale, versus, say, single-family homes with yards. As land increasingly becomes the prize commodity, developers are under pressure to effectively fit as many people on to the smallest parcel of land that they are legally allowed to do. However, not everyone wants to live in high-rise apartment buildings. 
Positive: Foreign investor demand in certain areas may result in much-needed rezoning
This rezoning could be in the interest of all; and could help open the floodgates to encourage greater provisions of services in much needed areas; things like improved road works, more schools and hospitals being built, and greater stimulation for small businesses to enter areas where higher population growth has been earmarked for. 
Negative: A more expensive property market can cause house-crowding
Many factors contribute to house and unit median prices increasing – foreign investors are just one of them. However, any contribution to making high-demand property exponentially more expensive for occupants could result in house crowding; or worse, illegal housing facilities being built.
A recent example is the Alexandria, NSW, <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-07-02/squatters-rescued-from-massive-fire-in-inner-sydney/5564762" target="_blank">fire that revealed an illegal housing ‘shanty’ facility</a>, which endangered the lives of dozens of people illegally living in squalid conditions. This, in an inner suburb area of Australia’s biggest city.
I’ve <a href="https://www.propertycorrespondent.com.au/overcrowding-properties-happens-stop/" target="_blank" title="Overcrowding In Properties – Why It Happens &amp; How to Stop It">written previously</a> about house and apartment crowding and this trend is only on the up. Beyond the immediate safety problems of cramming, say, 10 people into a two bedroom apartment, are the drain on local services and council facilities.
This is where foreign investors could be contributing to making high-demand properties more expensive from the outset, and for a portion of urban Australians such as students, new arrivals/immigrants, and low-income earners, overcrowding; whilst not an attractive option; may be an option they resort to, if they cannot afford the rent on their own. 
Positive/Negative: How much does our economy and society really benefit from foreign national property investors?
A number of news outlets have reported on foreign investors paying cash for their properties and leaving them untenanted/vacant most of the time. I have not been able to find sources that verify this as being a significant occurance/portion of foreign investors; however, there is risk of this occurring more in the future could grow.
If an investor is not using a local (Australian) bank to finance the purchase; and then leaving the property vacant for much of the year, this is a bad thing both economically and societally. Yes, the property investor may pay their dues in the form of council rates and so on, however, with vacant properties in high-demand areas it does little to ease any supply/demand shortfall currently being faced.
Negative: Councils get greedy for revenue, at the expense of citizen quality of life/services
This one is less a finger pointed at the foreign investor more so than it is the greed of some local councils back home.
As mass-scale property developers, themselves fuelled by the lure of foreign investors with very deep pockets quite willing to pay ‘asking price, and above’ for their giant unit blocks; present their plans for submission to councils; the councils themselves are hard-pressed to say no.
This can result in council areas approving higher housing density than perhaps they have the true infrastructure to actually handle. In other words; the lure of developer revenue is too great, at the expense of quality of life and sense of community for the inhabitants of the area.
Councils do this because they believe that the revenue generated by mass development will be used to provide better services to their area. The problem is, most councils under cook the true cost of these services provisions in the first place, or worse, they re-allocate the funds they receive from the developer somewhere else, before the development is complete.
This then sees a suburb increase enormously in population, without the infrastructure and investment in things like community programs, parks, public transport, and local commerce, provided. <a href="/news">Burwood</a>, NSW, is a good example here.
The Sydney suburb has a very relaxed local government, and is hungry for the foreign-investor-driven high-rise developments to be built there, yet the council is plagued with a backlog of infrastrucutre items it cannot possibly afford.
</body></html>

Increased foreign investment in Australian residential property: The pros and cons

Macquarie York has appointed Roberts Co to as the Early Contractor Involvement (ECI) partner for its upcoming new Surfers Paradise apartment development, Sunset Residence.

Located at 50 Sunset Boulevard, Sunset Residences is a riverfront, design-driven tower set to elevate one of Surfers Paradise’s most rapidly transforming enclaves. The refined scheme, designed by Plus Studio, features 72 luxury residences, enhanced amenity, and improved connectivity to the Nerang &nbsp;River.&nbsp;

As ECI partner, Roberts Co is working closely with Macquarie York and the design team to optimise buildability, program, staging and procurement strategies ahead of construction commencement.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Macquarie York Director, Roy Skaf, said Roberts Co’s early engagement will help ensure the landmark development realises its full potential.&nbsp;

“Sunset Residences is a signature project for Macquarie York, a chance to define a new level of riverfront living in Surfers Paradise," Skaf said.&nbsp;

&nbsp;

&nbsp;

<img alt="Roberts Co appointed Early Contractor Involvement partner for Macquarie York’s Sunset Residences on the Gold Coast" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="3dd22a45-168b-4e00-b6d2-4e7310b02084" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/SunsetResidences_Interior.jpg?VersionId=NAWvGq7l6BFB4vvh6u0xXWWISboHTi6q" />

“Partnering with Roberts Co under an ECI arrangement gives us the confidence that design decisions, construction methodology and programming are being rigorously considered from day one. Their collaborative mindset and technical capability are exactly what a project of this quality demands.”&nbsp;

&nbsp;

Construction is expected to commence following completion of the ECI phase and final design resolution.

Sunset Residences is one of three projects Macquarie York has locally. They have Rana Palm Beach, 60 apartments on Twenty Third Avenue, and Azariah, just nine residences on the dress circle Jefferson Lane, also in Palm Beach.

Joel Robinson

Macquarie York appoints Roberts & Co for early works agreement at Sunset Residences

Few developers in South East Queensland have shaped the new development apartment market as profoundly, or as consistently, as Mosaic Property Group. In 2025, the business delivered another very strong year across Brisbane, the Gold Coast, and the Sunshine Coast, building on the foundations of nearly two decades of discipline, long-term thinking, and relentless refinement of its craft.

Their continued success is driven from the top. Founder and Managing Director Brook Monahan, very much credits the success to a workforce of “massive grafters”, and a culture where complacency simply doesn’t exist.

“In every part of our business, we’re constantly pushing to get better” Monahan told <a href="http://apartments.com.au">Apartments.com.au</a>. “We never rest on our laurels.”

The company’s growth continued its upward trajectory, with the developer completing six luxury projects in 2025, representing approximately $850 million in value and delivering 536 new luxury homes. Mosaic also sold over $1.4 billion worth a new luxury apartments at an average price point of $3.41 million in 2025.

Heading into 2026, they have a further five projects under construction and an immediate pipeline across Brisbane and the Gold Coast, representing just shy of $2 billion in value. I spoke with Brook about everything from the evolution of Mosaic’s business to the fundamentals driving the SEQ property market.

<hr />
<h2>A market defined by two forces</h2>

The fundamental drivers of SEQ’s housing dynamics in 2025 are straightforward: a generational transfer of wealth on a scale Australia has never seen, and migration numbers that continue to exceed expectations.

“An enormous amount of wealth will move through the next decade,” Monahan explains. “That wave isn’t going anywhere.” Simultaneously, “you can’t run migration at the numbers we’re seeing, while also having a generational shift of wealth from boomers, and not expect demand to remain strong. People move here, they bring money, they want to buy a home and create a future.”

While top-end product in some pockets has softened from the frenzy of 18 months ago, Monahan believes&nbsp; the wave will remain “pretty strong,” especially for developers with brand trust and a long-term track record.&nbsp;

“The $4 million to $10 million segment remains fairly robust, but buyers are much more educated now than they’ve ever been. They have access to information and they’re smart people. They’re generally not&nbsp; willing to trust a new entrant asking $15 million with no track record.”

This heightened consumer discernment, he notes, is reshaping how premium projects are evaluated by developers.

<hr />
<h2>The problem behind the crisis</h2>

Despite strong demand, SEQ’s housing market remains severely undersupplied. Brisbane needs around 12,000 new homes per year, yet delivered only 4,000 last year. The Gold Coast requires similar levels but delivered 3,000. The backlog is massive.

“We’re probably 50,000 homes short in the next five years in Brisbane alone,” Monahan estimates. “Maybe 100,000 across the whole of Queensland.”

The core issue however isn’t planning.&nbsp;

“The planning environment is actually super supportive right now,” he says. “Approvals aren’t the problem. It’s turning approvals into real supply.”

The gap between development approvals and project starts has widened significantly as construction costs escalate, contractors disappear from the market, and inexperienced developers try, and fail, to bring projects to life.

“A development application (DA) is only part of the equation, it means little without the ability to deliver,” he explains. “Many applicants underestimate the complexity involved. It’s not just about securing a site; you need the right formula and all the right ingredients to make it work. Without that, the end result will fall short of expectations and increase the risk of project failure.

The result is market distortion: sites tied up by entrants who lack experience, capital certainty, construction understanding, or a realistic feasibility model. “It’s not good for the industry,” he says. “You get more and more mooted supply but very little real delivery.”

<hr />
<h2>Construction realities and the coming resource crunch</h2>

Beyond development capability, SEQ faces macroeconomic pressures. Over $7 billion must be delivered by late 2031 just for Olympics-related obligations. Add $18 billion in hospital and health infrastructure, and the region faces a “resource drain” Monahan believes will reshape delivery timelines and construction pricing for years.

“It will ultimately be great for SEQ for the next 20 years,” he says. “But it puts enormous pressure on an already chronically undersupplied housing market.”

This pressure will inevitably influence pricing. Double-digit growth cannot continue indefinitely, but Monahan sees no path to meaningfully lower construction costs. “It’s impossible to meet demand at a cheaper price point given labour capability and resource competition,” he says.

“Those who can afford it will keep paying more and the rest are fighting to get a foothold. That’s why the market keeps creeping upward.”

<hr />
<h2>Mosaic’s disciplined blueprint: Only A-Grade, iconic, irreplicable</h2>

With a long track record of delivery and in-house construction expertise, Mosaic works backwards from the cost of delivery to determine the right price for a site—a disciplined acquisition model they’ve adhered to from day one.

&nbsp;“We’re never out of the market,” Monahan says. “But we’re extremely disciplined. We don’t buy B+ sites. We won’t buy run-of-the-mill locations. Ever. That’s not our brand and it’s also not economically viable for us in most instances.”

Mosaic’s nine current developments illustrate this discipline:

<ul>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/lily-by-mosaic-4-rosewood-avenue-broadbeach-qld-4218">Lily</a> and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/buildings/marella-146-surf-parade-broadbeach-qld-4218">Marella</a>, Broadbeach: Two 30-storey buildings with permanently protected views over parkland, beach and coastline 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/isabel-by-mosaic-96-the-esplanade-burleigh-heads-qld-4220">Isabel</a> and, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/josephine-by-mosaic-166-the-esplanade-burleigh-heads-qld-4220">Jospehine</a>, Burleigh Heads – all “masterpiece” sites on the Esplanade with enduring view corridors of beach, water and coastline in the heart of Burleigh 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/sophia-by-mosaic-1357-gold-coast-highway-palm-beach-qld-4221">Sophia</a>, Palm Beach- directly on the dunes of the most highly sought after stretch of northern Palm Beach beachfront real estate 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/madeline-by-mosaic-22-mary-avenue-broadbeach-qld-4218">Madeline</a>, Broadbeach – “180 degrees beach, water and coastline views, great walk score” 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-bedford-by-mosaic-16-30-prospect-street-kangaroo-point-qld-4169">The Bedford</a>, Kangaroo Point – a site Mosaic first identified in 2016. Amazing walk score, views and inner city connectivity 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1"><a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-carter-by-mosaic-77-linton-street-kangaroo-point-qld-4169">The Carter</a>, Kangaroo Point – in between the Gabba and the Kangaroo Point peninsula with amazing walk score and uninterrupted and expansive northern city and river views 
	&nbsp;</li>
	<li aria-level="1">South Brisbane (launching 2026) – core inner-city Brisbane river waterfront site on the northern end of the peninsula with amazing river connection and permanent river and city views, amazing walk score</li>
</ul>

“Nothing we buy is guesswork,” Monahan says. “It’s always an iconic suburb where people genuinely want to live, with strong connections to water, lifestyle, amenity, or permanent view corridors.”

“Mosaic’s two most recent Brisbane acquisitions were several years in the making. The Bedford, launched on the prestigious Kangaroo Point peninsula and achieving 90 per cent sales within months was a site they identified back in 2016. The second, which is the yet to be released at 91 Montague Road in South Brisbane, has been on Mosaic’s radar since 2017.&nbsp;

Arguably one of Brisbane’s last great inner city riverfront sites, it sits within the city’s most dynamic cultural hub, offering unrivalled connectivity, lifestyle, and amenity, and standing as a landmark opportunity to define the next era of riverfront living.

“We know exactly what is and isn’t a Mosaic project. Strategic site selection is the critical foundation of everything we do. We’re always assessing opportunities, but based on our two most recent Brisbane acquisitions, it’s entirely possible that the sites we’re looking at today won’t transact for several years. That discipline is what ensures every project meets our exacting standards.”

<hr />
<h2>The Mosaic engine: Consistency, capability, and relentless execution</h2>

What separates Mosaic in a crowded field is not the ability to attract capital or buy a site, but the ability to deliver highly complex high end buildings, whether that is 37 storeys or 18 storeys, repeatedly and consistently.

“These buildings are inherently complex to deliver well,” Monahan says. “It takes a long time to know exactly what the market wants, how to deliver it, how to secure the right contractors and consultants, and how to align the product with what the market is actually willing to pay and can afford.”

With so many contractors exiting the market in recent years, genuine delivery capability has become increasingly rare. Monahan welcomes credible new entrants but cautions that underestimating the complexity of luxury development can lead to poor outcomes.&nbsp;

“It’s easy to assume high-end projects equal high returns, but without the right experience, track record, and capability, it’s a tough road. Attracting capital is one thing—delivering on expectations is another, and when that doesn’t happen, it impacts the entire market.’”

<hr />
<h2>Looking to 2026: A pipeline built on patience and precision</h2>

As 2025 draws to a close, Mosaic stands at the strongest point in its history. Since 2012 alone, the company has completed more than $2 billion in projects and is set to deliver another $2 billion worth of developments, hundreds of luxury apartments, all bearing Mosaic’s hallmark of impeccable delivery.&nbsp;

Next to launch are two standout projects: Josephine, an exclusive collection of just 30 half- and full-floor ultra-luxury residences coming soon to the Burleigh Heads beachfront, and a landmark tower on Montague Road in South Brisbane, comprising 204 apartments in the heart of the city’s cultural hub on the banks of the Brisbane river.

“We never arrive. There’s no finish line for us,” said Monahan. “Our focus is on continuing to evolve in the luxury space, creating incredible, design- and lifestyle-led properties that people love living in and that stand the test of time.” 
&nbsp;

What’s ahead for South East Queensland’s next development wave: Five minutes with Mosaic’s Brook Monahan

Developer Third.i has topped out its luxury Potts Point apartment development, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/muse-potts-point-30-34-brougham-street-potts-point-nsw-2011">Muse</a>.

Under construction by Dilcara and expected to complete in mid-2026, Muse comprises just 13 apartments designed by acclaimed architects <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/wmk-architecture">WMK Architecture</a> and Mathieson. The building’s design celebrates Potts Point’s heritage character while introducing refined modern elements like advanced building technology and private balconies and terraces that offer views of the Sydney city skyline.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112613 project_image_fid=231687]

Luke Berry, Director &amp; Co-Founder at Thirdi Group, said Muse is a celebration of Potts Point’s unique character and charm.

"With only 13 residences, we’ve created something truly special for those who appreciate exclusivity and design excellence," Berry says"

"The views, the location, and the lifestyle make Muse a rare opportunity in Sydney’s property market. We’re thrilled to see the project take shape and look forward to welcoming our residents in mid-2026.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=112613 project_image_fid=231686]

Only a limited number of residences remain at Muse.

Third.i recently launched The Rushcutters nearby, also just 13 large-scale apartments. The two-bedroom apartments were all snapped up in double-quick time. The three-bedroom apartments are priced from just under $5 million.

Potts Point has always been popular for apartment living, but given the lack of suitable development sites in the affluent suburb, new apartment developments have been few and far between.

Early next year Ceerose will launch <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/belgravia-potts-point-117-victoria-street-potts-point-nsw-2011">Belgravia</a>, a mix of two- and three-bedroom apartments on Victoria Street.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=112613]

Staff Writer

Third.i tops out Muse, Potts Point apartments

Buyer interest in Capital Corporation’s <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-apartments/the-residences-at-wahroonga-estate-169-fox-valley-road-wahroonga-nsw-2076">The Residences at Wahroonga Estate</a> has been gaining momentum following the recent groundbreaking and the commencement of construction.

Enquiry data has pointed to a clear theme: larger apartments are leading demand, particularly among downsizers who want to remain on Sydney’s Upper North Shore.

Since June, three-bedroom layouts have attracted the highest level of enquiry. The three-bed, two-bath, two-car apartments priced from $1.69 million generated the most enquiries, the highest of any floorplan, followed by the larger three-bed garden residences which are priced at $2.25 million.

It's been a prevailing theme for Capital Corporation, who, in the early stages of marketing, reacted to buyer feedback to create more three-bedroom apartments.

The numbers echo what <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/capital-corporation">Capital Corporation</a> has observed since the project’s early stages. Buyers want generous internal space, established amenity and the ability to age in place without leaving the area.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135247 project_image_fid=284378]

Capital Corporation Managing Director Jim Hunter said this was a major factor in the estate’s momentum, noting that “the combination of premium design, convenience and direct access to Sydney’s leading private hospital has proven to be a major drawcard”.

That connection to health and wellbeing has proven especially influential for older owner-occupiers. Research commissioned by Capital Corporation found that one in three Australians downsizing do so for health-related reasons, with a third specifically seeking proximity to medical facilities.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135247 project_image_fid=262185]

The buyer profile emerging at <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/wahroonga-nsw-2076">Wahroonga</a> Estate reflects this shift. Local residents Peter and Corinne Collins, both in their mid-70s, are among those who chose to downsize within the suburb after decades in their family home. They secured a top-floor three-bedroom apartment after queuing on launch day in March, citing the bushland setting, walkability, and peace of mind of being close to medical services as key reasons for their purchase.

“Being able to walk everywhere, including to the hospital if we need to, really gave us peace of mind,” Corinne told Apartments.com.au.

Read more: <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/nsw/from-family-home-to-bushland-retreat-why-peter-and-corinne-chose-the-residences-at-wahroonga-estate">From family home to bushland retreat: Why Peter and Corinne chose The Residences at Wahroonga Estate</a>

[smartcode_project:default project_id=135247 project_image_fid=3629]

Architecture firm <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/group-gsa">Group GSA</a>&nbsp;are behind the design at The Residences at Wahroonga Estate. There are 128 one-, two-, and three-bedroom apartments, complete with interiors&nbsp;by <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/interior-designers/coco-republic-interior-design">Coco Republic</a>. Floor-to-ceiling glass maximises views of the bushland ridgeline, while on-site amenity includes a residents’ lounge, pet-friendly Green Spine, BBQ pavilion and direct access to Coups Creek bushland and walking tracks.

Gold Star iCIRT-rated builder&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/builders/dasco-australia">DASCO</a>&nbsp;was&nbsp;appointed earlier this year to deliver The Residences at Wahroonga Estate. They are expected to complete the building in late 2027, with residents to move in shortly after.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=135247]

Downsizer demand continues to shape The Residences at Wahroonga Estate

With Brisbane’s housing market soaring and home ownership becoming increasingly out of reach for many buyers, townhouses have emerged as the new urban dream, offering private, low-maintenance retreats complete with pools, parklands, and lifestyle amenities.

As Brisbane faces a growing shortage of quality new residential offerings, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/honeycombes-property-group">Honeycombes Property Group</a> has released to the market Songbird Terraces, a boutique development of just 34 terrace homes in the heart of the leafy residential enclave of Oxley.

Offering a more affordable option to the white picket fence house, buyers can purchase a brand new architecturally designed three bedroom terrace home overlooking park and bushland with a communal heated pool, BBQ terrace, private parklands and an on-site café, while being just minutes from <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/oxley-qld-4075">Oxley</a>’s village centre, train station, and a range of schools and amenities.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149443 project_image_fid=5241]

Each of the spacious three bedroom plus multi purpose room or four bedroom townhomes feature premium finishes, landscaped courtyards, designer kitchens, two-car accommodation, and optional upgrades for tailored living.

Honeycombes Property Group Managing Director Peter Honeycombe said with completion anticipated in early 2027, this was an incredibly rare chance to buy a fixed-price, brand-new, off the plan home in one of Brisbane’s most tightly held and liveable suburbs, without the stress of auctions and chaotic open homes.

“With prices starting from $1.195 million, <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/new-townhouses/songbird-terraces-oxley-10-honeyeater-circuit-oxley-qld-4075">Songbird Terraces</a> are designed for owner occupiers seeking space, style and lifestyle, without the maintenance,” Honeycombe said.

“Surrounded by natural bushland and close to manicured parks, walking trails, boutique shops, cafes, cinemas and golf courses, Oxley continues to stand out as one of Brisbane’s most liveable suburbs.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149443 project_image_fid=355541]

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/project-marketer/colliers">Colliers</a> Residential Director Andrew Scriven said with a limited number of homes available, Songbird Terraces was attracting strong interest from families, upsizers, first home buyers and downsizers looking for quality, location and long-term value.&nbsp;

“Demand is high, supply is low, and the market is crying out for high-quality homes in established well connected areas like Oxley,” Scriven said.

“What was once seen as a compromise between a house and an apartment a townhouse has now become a lifestyle choice, more and more homebuyers are shifting their focus from traditional detached houses to modern, low-maintenance townhouses that offer greater value and convenience.

“As the city’s population grows and urban sprawl becomes less sustainable, Brisbane’s townhouse market is set to expand even further.&nbsp;

“There’s definitely a panic from buyers who’ve been pushed out of the house market but still want to stay in well-connected suburbs with great schools and amenities, they are worried they will miss out as property prices continually rise.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149443 project_image_fid=5238]

After eight years of calling Australia home, Agnes Skoraczewska and Matt Biskupski decided it was finally time to take the next step and purchase a home of their own. With property prices continuing to climb, the couple didn’t want to wait any longer and secured a three-bedroom plus multi purpose room townhouse at Songbird Terraces, locking in a fixed price ahead of their move in 2027.

“The truth is, we didn’t want to wait any longer,” Biskupski said. “Seeing what was happening in the market, we realised now was the right time to buy. It gives us peace of mind knowing we no longer have to worry about renting.”

When they discovered Songbird Terraces, the decision came easily.

“The area is lovely and quiet, yet still so close to the city, it’s the perfect balance for work and life,” Skoraczewska said. “It’s a place where we can recharge our batteries while staying connected to everything we need.”

[smartcode_project:default project_id=149443 project_image_fid=5237]

For Agnes and Matt, buying off the plan offered the ideal solution, the confidence of securing their dream home at today’s prices, and the excitement of planning for the future in a community that perfectly fits their lifestyle.

As the final residential precinct within the Songbird Oxley master plan, Songbird Terraces will continue to breathe new life into the area and help create a suburb destination rich in lifestyle amenity.

Colliers Residential Director Lily O'Connell said Songbird is positioned to take full advantage of elevated north and east-facing parkland views, the homes feature low-maintenance design and high energy efficiency to reduce ongoing costs while enhancing everyday comfort.

“And with an array of layouts, catering to a diverse range of lifestyles this is an offering for all,” O'Connell said.

“This is the final release in a masterplanned community that’s become one of Oxley’s most desirable addresses, offering a last chance to enter this community where opportunities are few and far between.”

The homes will be delivered by Clearcon Builders, specialists in premium townhome construction. They will commence construction before Christmas, and is aiming to complete the development in early 2027.

<h2>Songbird Terraces Snapshot</h2>

<ul>
	<li>34 architecturally designed 3 bedroom + multi-purpose room terrace homes.</li>
	<li>An array of layouts, catering to a diverse range of lifestyles.</li>
	<li>Perfectly positioned to take advantage of north and east views over park and bushland.</li>
	<li>A multi-purpose room, which can serve as a second living area, teen retreat, study or fourth bedroom.</li>
	<li>Designer kitchens featuring high quality engineered stone benchtops and European appliances.</li>
	<li>Spacious outdoor living areas and landscaped courtyards perfect for alfresco dining.</li>
	<li>Generous internal and external spaces, designed to take advantage of views overlooking park and bushland.</li>
	<li>Low maintenance, energy efficient &amp; two car accommodation.</li>
	<li>Access to a heated resort-style pool, outdoor entertaining terrace and beautifully landscaped gardens and park.</li>
</ul>

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=149443]

Songbird Terraces offer 34 architect-designed townhomes in private enclave, surrounded by bushland, parks and resort style amenity

Cameron McEvoy

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Cameron McEvoy

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.