Killara is set for one of its densest ever new development with a new project approval set to bring 55 new apartments to the affluent Upper North Shore suburb.

The development,&nbsp;at 23-25 Lorne Avenue, near Killara Golf Club,&nbsp;is being led by by BWSLD Killara Pty Ltd, an entity with ties to Bridgewell Capital, which has an association with Bridgehill Group - the developer behind a series of projects in Roseville, Castle Hill, and Kogarah.

The approved scheme will deliver a mix of one to four-bedroom configurations, with a higher proportion of two- and three-bedroom layouts. Ten of the apartments are allocated to affordable housing under the NSW Government’s Housing SEPP framework.

Located just 300 metres from Killara train station, the proposal takes advantage of new Transport Oriented Development and Infill Affordable Housing controls.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/bka-architecture">BKA Architecture</a>, the design lead on the project, noted that the scheme “offers an increase in high-quality housing for singles, couples and families within a green urban context, while responding to Killara’s shift toward higher-density housing."

The design achieves a minimum 7-star NatHERS rating, with photovoltaic solar panels planned to supplement energy use. More than 70 per cent of apartments achieve both solar access and cross-ventilation, limiting reliance on artificial cooling.

BKA Architecture emphasised the project’s landscape-led approach.

“The proposal has worked to retain mature existing trees, both on the subject site and neighbouring sites, while increasing the amount of native planting. The proposed development sits comfortably within a dense urban tree canopy and 3–6 metre wide deep soil zones."

Aesthetically, the building is articulated with a defined base, body and top, featuring a material palette of brick, aerated concrete, fibre cement panels, and non-combustible timber-look battens. Bronze-toned awnings and operable privacy screens provide additional detailing.

The site sits opposite the Killara Heritage Conservation Area.

The practice also acknowledged the site’s deeper cultural setting. “The site is located on the traditional country of the Dharug and Guringai peoples, who are the traditional custodians of the land. All new canopy trees proposed are native, linking the site with their natural ecology”

&nbsp;

Urban Editorial

Bridgewell secures approval for 55-apartment project in Killara

A new mixed-use development has been proposed for a prominent corner of Anzac Avenue in <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developments/redcliffe-qld-4020">Redcliffe</a>.

There are plans for a new seven-level building across four amalgamated lots totalling 3,423 sqm. Under the scheme, the would be 70 new apartments delivered, above street-level retail between 23-27 Anzac Avenue, opposite Bluewater Square shopping centre and a short walk to Settlement Cove Lagoon.

The proposed development sits within the Redcliffe Seaside Village Precinct of the Moreton Bay Regional Council’s Centre Zone and will be code assessable under the MBRC Planning Scheme 2016.

<img alt="25 and 27 Anzac Avenue Redcliffe" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="ced915e4-1d4a-4100-8405-a0b3ab0da6f9" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Anzac%20Avenue%20Redcliffe.png?VersionId=9gUh6ca8K3PJs.1ZjJexmZt6FYfkIUq6" />

Designed to activate the street and contribute to the local urban fabric, the proposal features a mix of apartment types: 15 three-bedroom, 50 two-bedroom, and five one-bedroom units arranged across five residential levels above a podium.&nbsp;

Ground-level retail tenancies and parking will be complemented by a first-floor parking level, delivering a total of 106 on-site car spaces.

“The proposed building has been designed to activate the street frontage through a built form that provides connectivity with the footpath area at street level,” noted IB Town Planning in their documentation submitted as part of the application. They added that the design "aligns with the desired streetscape outcomes for centre areas under the MBRC Planning Scheme”.

Each floor will have 14 apartments, and all residences will feature private balconies, with areas ranging from seven sqm to over 250 sqm for the terrace-style units on the podium level. A 105 sqm communal recreation area is also proposed on the second level.

Most of the land is cleared, apart from an old office building.

Redcliffe rarely sees new development opportunities. South East Queensland developer Gardner Vaughan Group is over 60 per cent sold of the first stage of its Redcliffe Parade development, One Redcliffe.

Joel Robinson

First look: 70 apartments above retail heads for Redcliffe's Anzac Avenue

The developer behind the three-tower, $1 billion Brisbane Quarter precinct, is looking at its next mega development in the heart of the capital.

<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/shayher-group">Shayher Group</a> has filed plans with the Brisbane City Council for a new two-tower development at 309 North Quay, a 6,436 sqm site almost at the foot of the&nbsp;William Jolly Bridge.

Under the scheme, they would deliver two 56 and 51-level towers with over 1,100 one to four-bedroom apartments, including a mix of build-to-sell and branded short-term accomodation.

<img alt="309 North Quay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="ed38014a-6045-4ac3-b52f-0d0147f4a94b" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Shayher%20pers.png?VersionId=_suNf_vp0xH1CPpftB0m_UxEzSeBbxxN" />

The towers, designed by&nbsp;<a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/blight-rayner">Blight Rayner</a> and <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/plus-studio">Plus Studio</a>,&nbsp;will sit atop a layered podium incorporating publicly accessible retail, a cross-block pedestrian link, and an expansive plaza, with 852 basement car spaces planned across both stages.

According to the Town Planning Report prepared by Urbis, the proposal seeks to “create vibrant and permeable public spaces” and offer “functional public spaces with a richly landscaped plaza and a cross-block pedestrian link that enhances walkability across the precinct."

Design features include a “cliff garden” podium, extensive subtropical landscaping, and sculptural forms that reflect Brisbane’s subtropical identity.&nbsp;

“The development showcases high-quality subtropical architecture that aligns with Brisbane’s identity,” noted the report, adding that the towers incorporate “dynamic faceted glazing” and slender profiles that contribute positively to the city’s skyline.

<img alt="309 North Quay" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="bef7fe88-ca5e-43fb-942d-2291fe058745" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Shayher%20podium.png?VersionId=UXOe2zRQNy8CkMmQRRwyFf69iR1thjfF" />

The project is positioned adjacent to the Roma Street Priority Development Area (PDA), placing it within close proximity to the new Cross River Rail station and the upcoming Brisbane Metro hub.&nbsp;

The proposal has been framed in the context of Brisbane’s Inner City Strategy and the Roma Street Precinct Renewal Strategy, both of which identify the area as primed for high-density, transit-oriented renewal.

The site, currently vacant, formerly housed a commercial building used for office and broadcasting. Its strategic location affords direct access to major transport corridors, including Coronation Drive, the Inner City Bypass, and the William Jolly Bridge, with Roma Street Station just 150 metres away.

Shayher has several projects they are working through, the most notable the <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/news/qld/first-look-exclusive-shayher-group-file-for-first-stage-of-bulimba-barracks">redevelopment of the Bulimba Barracks</a>. They revealed the plans for the first stage last year, for a 6,382 sqm parcel of the 20.73-hectare block.

Having demolished the majority of the buildings that were part of the barracks from World War II to the 1980s, they will work with the fabrication workshop which was a barge building shop in the war, which will form one of three buildings in the stage. Two will be residential, with just under 70 apartments planned.

Shayher Group plots 1,100 apartments in two new Brisbane CBD towers

A bold new infill development has been proposed for a key stretch of Pacific Highway in North Sydney, with <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/developers/legacy-property">Legacy Property</a> lodging plans for a mixed-use project that would integrate affordable housing and retain a locally listed heritage building.

The proposal, prepared in collaboration with architects <a href="https://www.apartments.com.au/architects/nettletontribe">Nettletontribe</a>, seeks to transform a strategic site near the Victoria Cross Metro Station with a part 10, part 13-level building.&nbsp;

A two-level commercial podium will activate the Pacific Highway frontage, while four basement levels will accommodate car parking and servicing.

The residential tower includes a mix of market and affordable apartments, with the latter fulfilling the requirements of the Housing SEPP’s infill affordable housing provisions.&nbsp;These units are to be delivered in collaboration with Cubic Real Estate, a registered community housing provider.

The site includes a locally listed heritage building at 265 Pacific Highway, which will be retained and adaptively reused. The design seeks to respect the heritage significance of the item while integrating it into the broader scheme.&nbsp;

The podium reflects the scale of the adjacent heritage building (The Cloisters Antique Store) and allows for “restoration and meaningful re-purposing” of the structure,&nbsp;Nettletontribe noted in its Design Report.

A defining element of the proposal is the stepped massing from north to south, responding to the site’s topography and the lower-scale residential character of Church Lane. Setbacks increase above the podium to reduce visual bulk and improve privacy and solar access to surrounding properties. Communal open spaces are provided at ground level and the rooftop, supporting amenity for future residents.

Architecturally, the design adopts principles of the NSW Better Placed policy, incorporating sustainable features such as full electrification, EV charging provision, and deep soil landscaping.&nbsp;

Nettletontribe’s report also details the landscape strategy, which incorporates native and culturally significant plants, with a focus on edible bush foods in recognition of the site’s location on Gamaraigal Country.

The proposal builds on an approved plan from 2023 that uplifted controls on height and FSR for the site, reflecting its proximity to major transport infrastructure and alignment with North Sydney’s strategic housing targets.

The new application has been submitted as a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) through the NSW Government.

First look: Legacy Property proposes shop-top housing for key North Sydney site

The Minns Labor Government and the Inner West Council will partner on rezoning along the Parramatta Road corridor that could deliver around 8,000 new homes close to the CBD.

The proposed rezoning would cover the section of Parramatta Road within the Inner West Local Government Area, complementing work already underway with Inner West Council, Burwood and Canada Bay Council.

This transport corridor which is serviced by a significant number of bus, light rail and train routes is close to the Sydney CBD with direct access to major hospitals including Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, a number of local public schools with existing capacity and green space.

Throughout the rezoning process affordable housing, active transport connections, new open space, retail and commercial opportunities, as well as improvements to the public domain will all be examined.

Sydney is the second least affordable city in the world, with house prices having significantly outstripped wage growth over the last two decades and a NSW Productivity Commission report warning that Sydney is at risk of becoming a city without grandchildren as NSW is losing twice as many young people as it gains each year.

Premier of New South Wales Chris Minns says&nbsp;Parramatta Road has been talked about for decades with little result.

"It’s time to stop talking and start building. &nbsp;What will transform this major corridor is more homes for people to revitalise this area. That’s what’s needed to deliver more vibrancy to one of our city’s most important corridors.

“We know Sydney is facing a housing crisis. That’s why my Government is working with councils like the Inner West to get homes built faster, and in places with existing services and infrastructure.

“We’re not just planning for more homes, we’re planning for better communities, with more affordable housing, better streetscapes and public spaces, and access to jobs and transport.”

Minister for Planning and Public Spaces Paul Scully says&nbsp;Parramatta Road needs more homes and jobs in vibrant communities.

"It’s a major transport corridor that connects so many communities to the city but it can be so much than a tired thoroughfare. By working closely with Inner West Council, we’ll make sure planning reflects the needs of local communities while providing the new homes Sydney so desperately needs.”

The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure will work with council and the relevant State government agencies to progress the rezoning. There are no compulsory acquisitions proposed as part of this plan.

The Minns Labor Government has been leading the way with bold plans to deliver more housing for young people and families who have been locked out of desperately needed new homes

This builds on previous work from the Minns Government to increase homes along the Parramatta Road transport corridor including:

<ul>
	<li>8 projects along Parramatta Road that have been declared State Significant through the Housing Delivery Authority and the Infill Affordable Housing Bonus which could deliver 3,968 homes, including affordable housing.</li>
	<li>Three sites from the government land audit, which will deliver around 800 homes, including social and key worker housing.</li>
	<li>A Transport Oriented Development Accelerated Precinct and state-led rezoning at Homebush and North Burwood which combined will deliver up to 33,000 homes.</li>
	<li>And 11 Low and Mid-Rise sites along the length of the corridor.</li>
</ul>

This has been further supported by once in a generation reforms introduced by the Minns Labor Government to build more well-located homes for young people and families including the largest rezoning in NSW history and delivering the largest investment in social and affordable housing in the state’s history at $6.6 billion.

&nbsp;

Up to 8,000 new homes planned for Parramatta Road corridor

Regional Planning

<html><body>
A regional development inquiry has found another reason for a national settlement strategy.
The Planning Institute Australia (PIA) has welcomed a Parliamentary Select Committee’s call for greater investment in Australia’s rural and regional towns, citing their report, “Regions at the Ready: Investing in Australia’s Future”, as further clear evidence of the need for an integrated national settlement strategy.
After the Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation report published its findings last week, Chief Policy Officer Rolf Fenner acknowledged PIA had consistently called for the Commonwealth to acknowledge the wider implications of its policy actions and investment decisions and to better promote regional development.
PIA believes that governments need to adequately fund research into the drivers of population change and settlement patterns in regional areas to understand to a greater degree the effects of it's policy actions.
As well as tp empower local communities to promote sustainable development and a better quality of life through integrated land use policies or spatial planning.
In its submission to the House of Representatives inquiry into the Australian Government’s role in the Development of Cities in 2017, PIA repeated its call for a "clear spatial planning framework" to guide and promote regional development and "guard against growing inequality between city and country Australia".
Mr Fenner said efforts to counter regional inequality needed to go beyond the traditional emphasis on direct tax/transfer redistribution and 'pork-barreling' grant programs.
Instead they should focus more on geographically appropriate and targeted investments.
These include infrastructure provision, training and job creation activities, and strategic urban and regional planning frameworks endorsed by all levels of government.
“It’s pleasing the inquiry grasps what PIA has long understood, namely that our rural and regional communities must be great places to live and work if Australia is to continue to prosper as a nation,” Mr Fenner said.
“The liveability or amenity of a city, town or community is essentially how it feels and looks: the choice, quality and location of buildings, the parks, streetscapes, and the access to shops, schools, and recreational facilities,” Mr Fenner said.
“If we fail to invest in amenity, we will also fail to entice people to live or invest in regional Australia,” he concluded.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

PIA support Parliamentary committee's call for increased rural and regional investment

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
After a full year spent delving into the economic and social challenges facing regional Australia, the Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation this week delivered its report.
It’s a surprising piece of work. Why? Because it avoids the ingrained partisanship that has bedevilled regional policy in Australia.
Put simply, it’s good, rigorous work. It makes recommendations that any smart government, of any political hue, could support.
The report even avoids the landmines surrounding the highly contentious policy of decentralisation – the relocation of city-based public service agencies to the regions. It has sidestepped its most obvious route – a squabble over decentralisation – and instead taken a good, hard look at the big issues confronting regional communities and economies.
Let’s take a moment to recall the politically awkward background to this inquiry. It was launched following Barnaby Joyce’s controversial decision to uproot the Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority from Canberra and relocate it to Tamworth, in his own electorate.
A separate Senate committee had already inquired into that decision. Its report (issued a year ago) demonstrated the highly politicised nature of this policy terrain: the majority report, by non-government senators on the committee, firmly rejected the relocation, while the minority report by government senators slammed the entire inquiry as “a political witch-hunt”.
This new inquiry could have traversed the same terrain, with the same outcomes. Certainly, the terms of reference were heavily focused on the issue of decentralisation. But they also invited comment on the overarching wellbeing of regional Australia, and this provided an opportunity the committee members seized.
The committee’s report covers a sweeping range of issues, which is entirely necessary, given the complex interactions between regions and what the committee terms “megatrends” – things like globalisation, population ageing, urbanisation and technological change.
The committee’s recommendations are similarly comprehensive and unapologetically ambitious. The explicit goal is to move beyond the old “roads and rail” approach to regional investment. Instead, it supports strategic (or “catalytic”) investments that build workforce and leadership capacity, cultural capital and infrastructure to support and attract jobs.
The report even elucidates 12 principles of regional development. It’s a sure sign that the committee made a genuine effort to synthesise information from the 196 submissions it received and the more than 100 witnesses at public hearings around the country.
The 13 recommendations are arranged around a central strategy, with six interrelated themes:
<ul>
<li>
building “enabling infrastructure” that supports development
</li>
<li>
identifying regional development priorities through a national process
</li>
<li>
extending the fledgling City Deals program to regional cities
</li>
<li>
giving Regional Development Australia committees more power and resources
</li>
<li>
developing a proper policy for public sector decentralisation
</li>
<li>
strengthening regional universities.
</li>
</ul>
I’ll own up to being very pleased that my own recommendation made it onto the list: that the government prepare a white paper on regional Australia. This would elevate regional policy to the same hallowed arena as foreign, defence and security policy.
All of this would be monitored by a new Joint Standing Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation, to cement parliamentary oversight of the work program.
And what about shifting all of those public sector jobs out of the capital cities and into the regions? This isn’t a new debate. In fact, decentralisation is a recurring theme in regional development, at both federal and state levels.
The practice of governments luring, or pushing, jobs from the corporate and public sectors into regional Australia stretches back to the 1930s. Since then, governments have periodically promised – and occasionally delivered – highly interventionist policies to move labour and capital from the cities to the country.
This inquiry was charged with examining decentralisation, and its report does exactly that, but in an admirably low-key way. Shedding more light than heat, the report insists that decentralisation should only be pursued where it makes sense – that it “should be part of a broader strategy for regional development”. That simple statement is a marked departure from the previous partisan bickering on this issue.
So where does this report leave us? And, more importantly, what does it do for the nearly 9 million Australians who live in regional and rural areas?
The answer is, the committee has laid out a far-reaching and highly practical work program for regional development. If either side of politics took up its recommendations, regional communities might find themselves in a better position to construct sustainable, enjoyable futures.
In the short term, an election is due in the next 12 months and there’s a good chance this report’s recommendations will be cherry-picked for election policies.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/99136/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">But beyond the current electoral cycle, this report gives federal parliamentarians a comprehensive plan for meaningful work over the next decade or more. Here’s hoping they make the most of it.
Amanda Walsh, Associate Director, Government Relations, Australian Catholic University
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/report-recommends-big-ideas-for-regional-australia-beyond-decentralisation-99136" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

Report recommends big ideas for regional Australia – beyond decentralisation

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/69199/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Special interest groups have had much more influence than the wider community on the new regional plan for Southeast Queensland.
A draft of the plan, ShapingSEQ, was recently released for comment. Prior input from the wider community was limited to submitting “thought bubbles”about the region without having the benefit of any report card on how the previous plan had performed. 
This process did not accurately gauge community concerns and submitters were not a representative sample. Perhaps it gave people the feeling they’d “had a say”. The process just as likely reinforced cynicism about government consultation.
Regional planning in Southeast Queensland began in the early 1990s when councils in the region signed up to the Regional Framework for Growth Management. This was a non-binding set of guidelines promoted by the state government to manage land-use change. 
Subsequently, this framework evolved into a statutory regional plan in 2005. It is noteworthy that consultation in the lead-up to the 2005 plan included the public release of discussion papers with options for the region’s future.
The initial focus was very much on getting southeast Queensland councils to accept the need for regional planning. At that time, the role of the wider community was relatively minor. 
A 1990 meeting of representatives from government, business, trade unions, professional groups and community organisations was an important impetus for starting the regional planning process. This “stakeholder” model of community engagement has been the dominant form of consultation ever since.
Stakeholders or citizens?
Stakeholders have particular vested interests – such as protecting the environment, promoting a business sector, or advancing a government agency’s agenda. 
Preparation of the 2016 draft plan involved several of these stakeholder “reference groups”. Participants in these groups were there to advocate for the organisation they represent, often making it more difficult to find “outside-the-box” solutions.
Consultation by negotiating with stakeholders is consistent with the dominant view that explicitly pursuing the public interest is less important than growing the economy. Consequently, an “issue management” approach has been taken, with stakeholders “competing” for influence over which development regulations are put in place. Within this worldview, trade-offs between stakeholders usually take place in a “growth first” framework.
An alternative is to promote informed deliberation by citizens who don’t represent particular interests. The Perth Dialogue with the City process shows how this “citizen” approach can work. 
This was a process of engagement with a large group of demographically representative Perth citizens. They were provided with relevant in-depth information before their deliberations about the city’s future.
Wide consultation overdue
It has been at least ten years since there was either an open performance review of southeast Queensland regional planning, or consultation with the wider community on options for the region’s future. Engagement with the wider community is particularly important now for a couple of reasons.
First, the 2016 draft plan claims to have a 50-year vision horizon, compared to the previous plan’s 20 years. Because of this change, the wider community should have been engaged in developing this new vision rather than being presented with a fait accompli in the draft plan. 
Second, the draft plan represents a significant change of focus from the previous 2009 plan. That plan aimed to reduce the region’s ecological footprint and mitigate climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In contrast, the 2016 draft seems to be adopting a more “growth first” approach. 
It is noteworthy that virtually all references to climate change in this new draft are about adapting to change rather than reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These significant changes should have been widely debated before the draft plan was prepared.
Independent report card needed
For a debate on future directions to be genuine, the community needs an independent, comprehensive report card on how things are tracking. 
The draft plan has ten indicators, some of which show modest improvement. However, other indicators, such as housing affordability and loss of biodiversity, have gone backwards. And koala numbers continue to decline.
The report card should also acknowledge that Australia (including southeast Queensland) has one of the worst records for resource use and greenhouse gas emissions per unit of economic output of any developed country.
Moving beyond ‘predict and provide’
The draft plan largely takes a basic “provide land for the predicted demand” approach, which assumes that regional planning is a type of technical process best left to the experts.
However, regional planning always involves trade-offs between different economic, social and environmental values. These should be openly discussed through genuine community engagement.
By not providing opportunities for such engagement, the draft plan has failed to give the community a real say in the region’s future.
Brian Feeney is urban planning researcher, The University of Queensland and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/brian-feeney-317083" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Regional Planning

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Regional Planning

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

The latest real estate & off the plan properties & news, delivered to your inbox.